3:26 Would it have been better strategy to ditch the 4s and go for 4 of a kind with 9x multiplier instead of the full house without multiplier? Also what’s the house advantage?
agree the 9x multiplier in that game would have made it worth the risk to get the 4 of a kind if not u still get paid for 3 of a kinds. ultimate x has different rules to follow. just like the 4 to a flush should have been played as well
Ok on the dealt boat. 10 hands drawing 2 cards each hand to make quad 3s which would’ve payed 1800 if you hit just once. Boat paid 350 even if you miss quads and get no boats you would’ve made 150 on the trips. Why not risk 230 to potentially win 1800+! I think you misplayed it.
roughly 4% each hand to get four of a kind. so 40% total. 1800*.4=720. Plus 15 for each 3 of a kind that didn't hit. So roughly it would have paid 860 going for the four of a kind. To play this game correctly you have to always be doing a lot of math. It is Ultimate X on steroids.
Two things I have noticed on this game: 1. You don't always get the best score for a hand. I had a 7x multiplier on a flush (playing 2s) and no multiplier on a SF. The machine gave me the 50 for the SF instead of 105 for the flush. 2. I think the strategy is FAR more complicated than just analyzing the game state as is. Say you have a very large multiplier on a flush. A 'basic' strategy using that multiplier will lead you to making plays that are likely to produce at most one flush. For example, it might suggest ATs is a better hold than AQo. But, getting just one flush clears that multiplier, and leaves you in a worse state for the next hand. You might easily flop a 4 flush, where 2 or more is common, or better yet flop a made flush.
Interesting game. I do like that the multipliers stay until you hit one!
3:26 Would it have been better strategy to ditch the 4s and go for 4 of a kind with 9x multiplier instead of the full house without multiplier?
Also what’s the house advantage?
Yes, I agree, I should have done that.
Breaking up the full house seemed to have better odds.
agree the 9x multiplier in that game would have made it worth the risk to get the 4 of a kind if not u still get paid for 3 of a kinds. ultimate x has different rules to follow. just like the 4 to a flush should have been played as well
I agree. My mistake.
I’ve never seen this game before in a casino I’ve seen bonus streak
Ok on the dealt boat. 10 hands drawing 2 cards each hand to make quad 3s which would’ve payed 1800 if you hit just once.
Boat paid 350 even if you miss quads and get no boats you would’ve made 150 on the trips.
Why not risk 230 to potentially win 1800+!
I think you misplayed it.
roughly 4% each hand to get four of a kind. so 40% total. 1800*.4=720. Plus 15 for each 3 of a kind that didn't hit. So roughly it would have paid 860 going for the four of a kind.
To play this game correctly you have to always be doing a lot of math. It is Ultimate X on steroids.
Two things I have noticed on this game: 1. You don't always get the best score for a hand. I had a 7x multiplier on a flush (playing 2s) and no multiplier on a SF. The machine gave me the 50 for the SF instead of 105 for the flush. 2. I think the strategy is FAR more complicated than just analyzing the game state as is. Say you have a very large multiplier on a flush. A 'basic' strategy using that multiplier will lead you to making plays that are likely to produce at most one flush. For example, it might suggest ATs is a better hold than AQo. But, getting just one flush clears that multiplier, and leaves you in a worse state for the next hand. You might easily flop a 4 flush, where 2 or more is common, or better yet flop a made flush.
Am I the only one who noticed tht the RF is doubled?
I did but there is no chance of a multiplier on a RF - this game looks like a loser
Seems way too confusing or too much strategy for me.