About 15 years ago, the live sitcom The Goldbergs TV series was restored and depending on the quality of the kinnie, it had a "live" or at least a "videotape" look to it. This still looks like a film
In the 1956-'57 season, Dinah Shore appeared twice a week, 15 minutes- Tuesdays and Thursdays at 7:30pm(et)- for Chevrolet on NBC. Once a month, she also did an hour-long "CHEVY SHOW". In the fall of '57, the quarter-hour series ended, as she continued the hour shows on a weekly basis (on Sundays), through 1961.
+ReflexFilmScanner; the output is beautiful. My question - and I'm NOT asking 'how', WHAT shows the (2:16) 'proprietary software application' do? Thanks.
Does your company offer a restoration of the "video look", restoring an interlaced 60 fields a second option? Some UK programs have done this, though it's probably easier given the different systems (they ran their telerecording cameras at 25 frames a second so they don't get all that horizontal noise for example).
@@tsuwaque It's more like REinterlacing. Taking one frame of film and changing it from looking like a kinescope into looking like videotape. I read that it could be done with off the shelf software and that was a decade or more ago, so I'm sure it could be done at home with a bit of skill.
@joquendoTV Say what???? How did you figure that? 35mm has more than twice the physical area with which to capture an image. I suppose by your logic then 8mm must be the best format and 70mm the worst??? I'm afraid you've got it bass ackwards.
Objectively, 35MM offers the best picture quality (unless you start looking at 70MM and 15/70 IMAX), not to mention room for two digital soundtracks, but I personally prefer 16MM because it might not be quite as good as 35MM, but it still looks pretty decent, and the cameras aren't quite as big.
Кино
![Sean Rii, Karyon, Sharzkii - Taungule [My Love] (Official Music Video)](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/eJoMuypbSzQ/mqdefault.jpg)
So nice to see Dinah Shore again...
About 15 years ago, the live sitcom The Goldbergs TV series was restored and depending on the quality of the kinnie, it had a "live" or at least a "videotape" look to it. This still looks like a film
I recently found a 16-millimeter kinnie of an episode not on the DVD set.
looks good, nice work
In the 1956-'57 season, Dinah Shore appeared twice a week, 15 minutes- Tuesdays and Thursdays at 7:30pm(et)- for Chevrolet on NBC. Once a month, she also did an hour-long "CHEVY SHOW". In the fall of '57, the quarter-hour series ended, as she continued the hour shows on a weekly basis (on Sundays), through 1961.
Very nice
+ReflexFilmScanner; the output is beautiful. My question - and I'm NOT asking 'how', WHAT shows the (2:16) 'proprietary software application' do? Thanks.
Does your company offer a restoration of the "video look", restoring an interlaced 60 fields a second option? Some UK programs have done this, though it's probably easier given the different systems (they ran their telerecording cameras at 25 frames a second so they don't get all that horizontal noise for example).
Deinterlacing can be easily done at home
@@tsuwaque It's more like REinterlacing. Taking one frame of film and changing it from looking like a kinescope into looking like videotape.
I read that it could be done with off the shelf software and that was a decade or more ago, so I'm sure it could be done at home with a bit of skill.
@@empinball4638 It CAN be done if you know how to use AVISynth, but it depends on the quality of the source material.
A similar technique has been used to make Jackie Gleason's 1950s "Honeymooners" TV series look like it was taped today.
Which is better, 16mm or 35mm film?
35 mm is better cos it has grater quality
16 mm is smaller and I think cheaper
@joquendoTV Say what???? How did you figure that? 35mm has more than twice the physical area with which to capture an image. I suppose by your logic then 8mm must be the best format and 70mm the worst??? I'm afraid you've got it bass ackwards.
@@niknikktm bass ackwards. Can I keep that?
Objectively, 35MM offers the best picture quality (unless you start looking at 70MM and 15/70 IMAX), not to mention room for two digital soundtracks, but I personally prefer 16MM because it might not be quite as good as 35MM, but it still looks pretty decent, and the cameras aren't quite as big.