Interesting how he compares his argument to the abolition of slavery, not apparently caring that the Bible condones the keeping of slaves, and even advises slavemasters on how to beat them properly. That, not to mention the rape of young women, taking of human trophies as spoils of war, and the miriad baby killing that God not only allows, but in some cases officially sanctions. So really this man's argument is flawed from the start. Not that this will have any effect of course. The Bible is best described as Mark Twain once did : "a book of some good philosophy, nice poetry and upward of a thousand lies.".
Great ti hear this.
Interesting how he compares his argument to the abolition of slavery, not apparently caring that the Bible condones the keeping of slaves, and even advises slavemasters on how to beat them properly.
That, not to mention the rape of young women, taking of human trophies as spoils of war, and the miriad baby killing that God not only allows, but in some cases officially sanctions.
So really this man's argument is flawed from the start. Not that this will have any effect of course. The Bible is best described as Mark Twain once did : "a book of some good philosophy, nice poetry and upward of a thousand lies.".