ANOTHER Boeing 737-800 Skids off Runway Hours Before Jeju Air Plane Crash
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 1 янв 2025
- A KLM-operated Boeing 737-800 narrowly avoided disaster after skidding off the runway during an emergency landing in Oslo, Norway. The Amsterdam-bound flight experienced hydraulic failure, forcing an urgent diversion. Thankfully, all 182 passengers and crew escaped unharmed.
This near miss comes just days after a tragic aviation disaster in South Korea, where a Jeju Air Boeing 737-800 skidded off the runway and burst into flames, killing 179 people. Investigators are working to determine the cause of South Korea’s deadliest air crash, as families mourn their loss and call for government support.
Subscribe here: bit.ly/ODNsubs
TikTok: / ondemandnews
Twitter: / odn
Facebook: / odn
If you wish to purchase any of our clips for commercial use, please visit: www.itnproducti...
![Blox Fruits Dragon Rework Update [Full Stream]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/EqDAp8udhm0/mqdefault.jpg)
That is the third 737 accident in a few days,something wrong with the 800 series?
Which three ones? I only know Oslo and jeyu
What is wrong with it ? Well, for starters...it's a Boeing?😂
Srilankan airlines from its inception in 1979, uses Airbus aircrafts. For 45 years it has Zero fatal accidents associated with Airbus aircrafts.
Srilankan's only accident is a landing gear failure in 1992 and it is a Boeing 737. The Airline retired all its Boeing fleet in 1995 and since then it has used only Airbus aircrafts.
@merithika_2.2M exactly I watched the Boeing ceo in front of congress and was appalled. Since moving from the usa to Germany I'm sticking with airbus from now on. They have an impeccable record compared to Boeing.
There are 3 Boeing 737-800 incidents in this week.
1. Air Canada Flight 2259 - Hydraulic Failure, tires did not deploy properly
2. KLM Flight 1204 - Hydraulic system failure
3. Yeju Flight 7C2216 - Hydraulic system failure
All Boeing 737-800 models.
Air Canada Flight 2259 is a Dash 8 not Boeing
Yes ✅@@koharaisevo3666
Now mossad is self destructing Boeing aircraft!?
The recent Jeju Air crash involving a 15-year-old Boeing 737-800 (Next Generation) should not automatically be attributed to Boeing or its design. Preliminary reports suggest a combination of pilot error during a high-stress situation and external factors, such as a poorly placed wall, played a significant role. Evidence indicates that the pilots may have inadvertently shut down the wrong engine following a bird strike, leading to the use of reverse thrust only on the impacted engine. Furthermore, the aircraft touched down at approximately 230+ knots which was excessively high for a standard landing configuration and even a clean configuration.
It is essential to distinguish this incident from issues related to the Boeing 737 MAX, as the aircraft involved belongs to a different series with an established safety record. Blaming Boeing without understanding the nuances of the situation is not only unfair but also disrespectful to the investigation process and the aviation community. Just as we don't blame Airbus every time an A320 crashes, we should avoid letting media narratives mislead public perception. In aviation, informed and factual discussions are critical if you're not familiar with the facts, it's better to avoid making assumptions.
That South Korean flight is so sad. Im sure the passengers thought that since they were on the ground, it would end good. Rip.
The 3 sisters
Azerbaijan jeju and klm
Rip
First of all. DO NOT make any conclusions before the proper investigations have been concluded.
Of course not. No conclusion but the facts are
- Within 3 days- 737-800 planes skidded off the runway. Once in Korea - the other in Oslo and the third in Halifax.
Nothing seen here - look over there
Other facts - all these 737 800 were assembled in the Boeing factory in Renton WA>
Boeing shut down all of its Military plane productions in the State of Washington, driven by disputes with the Unions.
Boeing moved the 737 Max production to their production site in Everette WA. What happened there? Do your own research and don't blame the UNIONS - they fight for more money - losing jobs of the workers is not their problem - Union Fees imposed is.
The recent Jeju Air crash involving a 15-year-old Boeing 737-800 (Next Generation) should not automatically be attributed to Boeing or its design. Preliminary reports suggest a combination of pilot error during a high-stress situation and external factors, such as a poorly placed wall, played a significant role. Evidence indicates that the pilots may have inadvertently shut down the wrong engine following a bird strike, leading to the use of reverse thrust only on the impacted engine. Furthermore, the aircraft touched down at approximately 230+ knots which was excessively high for a standard landing configuration and even a clean configuration.
It is essential to distinguish this incident from issues related to the Boeing 737 MAX, as the aircraft involved belongs to a different series with an established safety record. Blaming Boeing without understanding the nuances of the situation is not only unfair but also disrespectful to the investigation process and the aviation community. Just as we don't blame Airbus every time an A320 crashes, we should avoid letting media narratives mislead public perception. In aviation, informed and factual discussions are critical if you're not familiar with the facts, it's better to avoid making assumptions.
"Preliminary reports suggest a combination of pilot error during a high-stress situation and external factors, such as a poorly placed wall, played a significant role."
Source please?
Asking because the preliminary findings of the Official investigation that I read points to problem with the landing gears.
The firefighters, when deployed was also informed that the plane is experiencing problem with the landing gears.
Korean people are pi5sed! If the plane was the main cause, they can't divert the blame away from b0eing.
Make America great again
Don't fly with #Boeing 🤔🤔😉
The KLM plane was 24 years old. This is most likely a maintenance issue on an old plane
Not boeings fault
The recent Jeju Air crash involving a 15-year-old Boeing 737-800 (Next Generation) should not automatically be attributed to Boeing or its design. Preliminary reports suggest a combination of pilot error during a high-stress situation and external factors, such as a poorly placed wall, played a significant role. Evidence indicates that the pilots may have inadvertently shut down the wrong engine following a bird strike, leading to the use of reverse thrust only on the impacted engine. Furthermore, the aircraft touched down at approximately 230+ knots which was excessively high for a standard landing configuration and even a clean configuration.
It is essential to distinguish this incident from issues related to the Boeing 737 MAX, as the aircraft involved belongs to a different series with an established safety record. Blaming Boeing without understanding the nuances of the situation is not only unfair but also disrespectful to the investigation process and the aviation community. Just as we don't blame Airbus every time an A320 crashes, we should avoid letting media narratives mislead public perception. In aviation, informed and factual discussions are critical if you're not familiar with the facts, it's better to avoid making assumptions.
i GUESS Mechanics arent doing there job right.
ruclips.net/video/Z76YpCz9N2Y/видео.html
Well the difference between western pilot and Asians pilot, you can see, that why i never fly with asian flight aircraft,
Pilot error?
Great work Sherlock Holmes
@@thegoodguy44the guy we all needed is here
Sure. The pilots error was flying a Boeing aircraft.
KLM was due to pieces falling off the plane at takeoff.
@@sidneylittle5399 not Boeing's fault sidney