Mediation models: direct, indirect and total effects (part 6 of 6)
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 21 авг 2024
- Professor Patrick Sturgis in the sixth (of six) part of the ‘Structural Equation Modelling (SEM): What it is and what it isn't’ online course.
This video is part of the online learning resources from the National Centre for Research Methods (NCRM). To access all videos and the supporting materials (presentation slides, datasets, recommended reading, links to related publications and resources) visit www.ncrm.ac.uk...
For those who are confused about how to test the significance of the indirect effect, please have a look at Baron and Kenny (1986), Mallinckrodt et al. (2006) and Diciccio and Romano (1988).
How do you calculate an indirect effect of a model when the dependent variable has an non-recursive relation with the indirect latent variable?
Great video! Very helpful and informative.
Hi Professor, In my model, D, E,F (independent), mediating (B, C) and A (dependent). Total indirect effect from D to A is significant (p-0.018), but individual indirect effect from D>B>A is insignificant(p-0.069), and C>B>A is insignificant (p-0.154). How can I explain it?
Total and Individual indirect effects of E,F are significant
I am using SmartPLS
S Ra . So what is your explanation for such problem
hi, I have the same question, do you know the answer now? many thanks
09:28 The professor said reject the null. If we reject the null, shouldn't we conclude that there IS an indirect effect? He said there isn't.
a spectacular lecturing
in mediation analysis, panel data have heteroscadicity issue. how to solve it???
how do you test for the significance of the indriect effect??
Great mediation video, I feel so relaxed that I'm going to sell all my weed, thank you, so much, let's be RUclips pals?