You would need a scanning electron microscope to see traces on the foil for that ultrasonic cleaner experiment. There's currently a used broken desktop model (for parts) on ebay for $22,000 😬 That was an overwhelmingly intense fire hose of information and my mental bandwidth is limited to individual droplets, but it's worthwhile to look at Bob Greenyer's research. He has an impressive scanning electron microscope and finds traces of these bizarre objects, and shares his discoveries on RUclips. It's worth watching just to see that microscope in action.
I think I'm going to need to watch this one twice, and with notes! Highly dense, but highly interesting. Tim, You keep bringing us interesting people with interesting ideas. I'm sure this takes more effort than we realize, so thanks for this.
Pausing here Tim Venture. This Bob Greenyer guy is good. Nice terms, gravity propulsion and Sphere Making. Yes, Blackhole, event horizon to up-lifting space by compression, like the water molecule expanding upon freezing. I like his comments, you can accelerate particle mass in a simple water column compared to CERN. He is very close to dropping the circle below the electromagnetic force to unifying energy transfer to power control of mass. Gravity propulsion to content frame at evaporation. A real Hawking of an equation g = G Me/r^2(1e-/+Ef/Eo) Applied Relativity.
Yes, I really like Bob also! He speaks very well, nothing comes across to me as uncredible. High information density so it takes time to work through his material but it's definitely well researched.
I saw a strange phenomenon. A fresnel lens about the size of standard printer paper, lined up with the sun focused to a burning point, upon the surface of a glass of water. Some charcoal, or even coffee helps as it absorbs the rays. At any rate, the hearing of the water causes not a slow release of steam, but an explosion, bursting with enough force to throw droplets out of the glass. My expectation was that the water would heat uniformly throughout, or at the very most simmer and boil. But the light of the focused fresnel lens seemed to both turn the water into hydrogen and oxygen, and a moment afterward, ignite it. The pressure was too great for a steam release with no combustion. It's a very difficult thing to video with the brightness of the light.
What kind of mental techno cult did i stumble upon? Wondering what Heinz von Förster would say about this. I tried to avoid this field for the last 15 years, but a lot of this makes a lot of sense after what i have read and seen so far. Thank you for the upload, greetings from Vienna.
I would be curious to know what happens if you fire a laser into the black spot. So the creation of the black spot produces more energy than is used to produce it, but it transmutes into something which perhaps absorbs all energy, perhaps extinguishing the initial reaction. If you knew enough about the process then if you could exclude the creation of the black spot and and in doing that sustain the energy release. But of course that is just wild speculation. Fun thought: If you could create a powerful beam of those solitons you could aim it at stored weapons like tanks and ships guns bombs, missiles, over time the metal of the weapons would disintegrate. The first true weapon of peace.
I did the original interview that he referenced with the "black spot". I don't recall them mentioning a laser, but they claimed that it completely absorbed the ion beam they fired into it. At the time, they were completely mystified about the effect...
This is Observable Physics in Actuality, "perfectly obvious" quantization logic in e-Pi-i sync-duration resonance shell-horizons of phase-locked prime-cofactor frequency alignment of log-antilog Conformal Field Condensation, (not bs theory). "Vibration in a Steam Room" of vertices in vortices, superposition phase-locked harmonic quantization reciprocation-recirculation bubble-modes.
Black holes, pseudo-monopoles, relic-neutrino-powered bio-transmutation.. veritable cornucopia isn't it? I usually don't have time to sit through a two-hour BG presentation that could be summarised in a short list of bullet points, most of which i'd instinctively challenge with alternative, usually more-prosaic interpretations; disassembling almost any one of his predicates or conclusions would be a separate discussion in itself; as ever, he needs a hard-nosed physicist collaborator to bounce ideas off and help whittle things down to less sweeping, often contentious assumptions.. In particular, what's missing is a treatment of the inevitable inter-reactions between condensing-matter systems and their surrounding environments, which in these types of experimental rigs are rarely if ever truly isolated; formation of quasi-bosons consolidates Fermi numbers, allowing ie. electrically-interacting free charged particles in the surrounding environment to drop down into vacated lower-energy states, potentially setting off a wider chain reaction that exchanges energy with the environment. This is one of the prospective mechanisms for opening the system to anomalous energy exchange that team Rossi have implicated; subsequent decoherence of large charge clusters back into discrete fermions thus creates a 'musical chairs' squeeze in which the formerly lower-energy states they vacated have now been reoccupied, forcing the vacuum to assign them higher quantum-energy states than they began with, and thus potentially opening the system to an effective 2LoT violation with the ZPE. Similarly, such precipitous drops in entropy may also constrain thermal degrees of freedom of a gas for embodying and expressing its heat, potentially opening the system to environmental energy exchange via adiabatic / isothermal cycling. Are strange-radiation tracks ever seen to terminate, as if having dissipated all their energy, or are their estimated mass-energies only constrained by the detector thickness? Again, i'm challenging the assumption that their effective mass-energy is necessarily conserved, with all that entails - ie. ditto charge-clustering phenomena per se; active processes of environmental inter-reaction incorporating vacuum-polarising effects and ZPE exchange, the LENR perhaps facilitated through long-range p-p interactions between relatively-cool ions via the low-entropy electron condensate matrix. But enough hand-waving; good to see more attention being paid to the field - the only CMP that usually gets airtime are your typical academic headlines re. 'spin-polaritons in edge-defect topological insulators' etc. and what's lost in the general perception is that we're in the nascent era of exciting new branches of physics..
I don't think the neutrino flux argument checks out, but the cymatic charge cluster explanation seems feasible, it's like a phonon extension to coupled clusters in QED en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coupled_cluster If the process just eats up neutrino flux and the flux is basically constant how would the process ever end? There would only be a maximum cap on the nuclear process and you wouldn't reduce it to zero Unless it's a relative solar position thing, like the flux changes throughout the day because of the earth's relative position to the sun (flux_theta) & internal solar processes, which is feasible
Sounds like you caught yourself a right-handed neutrino clump to me. A member of the time reversed cyclic universe, which we are in parallel with. (Parallel? Merged, common, maybe better. Not a separate entity.) Extremely heavy slow moving righr-handed neutrinos could be in the ball park of 433, if they clump in groups. So may be "dark matter", or a contributor to it. There are probably several types of DM, i would guess. The black is interesting, and could possibly be analogous to the green oxidation on copper, allowing you to see the otherwise unseen. A shift in the interface, or boundary layer interaction. These things could act as (as much as i dislike the word applied to science...) a portal into the mirror cyclic side, another state of time or space.
Neutrinos are really interesting - I want to do more on them in the future. So ubiquitous, but it seems like science tends to generally ignore them (and I understand why, because they aren't reactive...)
@@TimVenturaInterviews I completely agree with that. It's a classic case of "Out of sight, out of mind." They're just treated as something to ballance the equation for momentum... But like all things- the more you look, the more you see..
Is there any known biological processes that could be impacted by this if observed in our biological natural world? Could our super-complicated biological photon detectors (our eyes) see something like this in say a bigger (say 2-3cm size) pattern? I've seen some weird things in darkrooms but, for me, OG photograph development is closer to biological than a CMOS sensor (as an example of newer tech). We were told it was the quality of the film/whatever back in the day but running the same negatives through negative digital scanners the quality of an output from negative to digital doesn't have the artifacts in the digital image - compared to enlarging photos in the closet darkroom circa 2003ish when we were proto-hipsters for having a darkroom in a rental flat. Thanks Tim for another great interview! (RIP apartment closet darkrooms) Edit: Thank you Bob as well - this is fascinating/so true stuff (in Canada, it's about a $100 in parts experiment 57:05) Side note - "I had to move it to a different part of the lab" is the rabbit hole any science nerd needs to go down. It's a trip.
Call me a skeptic. With all the resources we put into C.E.R.N. and the Standard Model; someone comes along with rotating metals that form a strange radiation that no one has seen before? Doubtful. Also, if you found a way to turn copper into gold, you'd be filthy rich and you could fund this research and live a fantastic lifestyle as well. Cheers.
The question you should be asking is why they build c ERn when Science has admitted That a Collider the size of the Milky Way galaxy Would still not have enough power To predict anything it's all bull politics and money grabs at this point
Awesome ❤ great interview ! You both would be great on coasttocoast iam still in contact with lisa Lyon her office us in Medford Oregon great interview
@@klingonbaronessprincesskar5519 Thanks John - I know that you were a friend and colleague of Ken Shoulders for decades, and I am glad that Bob Greenyer is doing so much to honor and extend his work.
You would need a scanning electron microscope to see traces on the foil for that ultrasonic cleaner experiment. There's currently a used broken desktop model (for parts) on ebay for $22,000 😬 That was an overwhelmingly intense fire hose of information and my mental bandwidth is limited to individual droplets, but it's worthwhile to look at Bob Greenyer's research. He has an impressive scanning electron microscope and finds traces of these bizarre objects, and shares his discoveries on RUclips. It's worth watching just to see that microscope in action.
I think I'm going to need to watch this one twice, and with notes! Highly dense, but highly interesting.
Tim, You keep bringing us interesting people with interesting ideas.
I'm sure this takes more effort than we realize, so thanks for this.
DO evo's explode?
Pausing here Tim Venture. This Bob Greenyer guy is good. Nice terms, gravity propulsion and Sphere Making. Yes, Blackhole, event horizon to up-lifting space by compression, like the water molecule expanding upon freezing. I like his comments, you can accelerate particle mass in a simple water column compared to CERN. He is very close to dropping the circle below the electromagnetic force to unifying energy transfer to power control of mass. Gravity propulsion to content frame at evaporation. A real Hawking of an equation g = G Me/r^2(1e-/+Ef/Eo) Applied Relativity.
Yes, I really like Bob also! He speaks very well, nothing comes across to me as uncredible. High information density so it takes time to work through his material but it's definitely well researched.
I saw a strange phenomenon. A fresnel lens about the size of standard printer paper, lined up with the sun focused to a burning point, upon the surface of a glass of water. Some charcoal, or even coffee helps as it absorbs the rays.
At any rate, the hearing of the water causes not a slow release of steam, but an explosion, bursting with enough force to throw droplets out of the glass.
My expectation was that the water would heat uniformly throughout, or at the very most simmer and boil.
But the light of the focused fresnel lens seemed to both turn the water into hydrogen and oxygen, and a moment afterward, ignite it.
The pressure was too great for a steam release with no combustion. It's a very difficult thing to video with the brightness of the light.
What you are seeing is the exact opposite of The skin affect of a droplet of water on a hot skillet. It is the same phenomenon
@@funnycatvideos5490 I'll check into that
Yeah baby, bring on the room temperature superconductors!
What kind of mental techno cult did i stumble upon? Wondering what Heinz von Förster would say about this. I tried to avoid this field for the last 15 years, but a lot of this makes a lot of sense after what i have read and seen so far. Thank you for the upload, greetings from Vienna.
I didn’t understand some of this but have the feeling however that radical applications are possible with these ideas. I want/need to learn more.
look up Malcolm Bendall's open source info... don't believe the people calling it a hoax
interesting stuff.
This is “mad science” RUclips at its finest.
my two favourite Evo's in one place
I'm glad you let this guy talk. I found it interesting, but I'm seriously doubtful about some of his notions ("bound neutrinos?")
I would be curious to know what happens if you fire a laser into the black spot. So the creation of the black spot produces more energy than is used to produce it, but it transmutes into something which perhaps absorbs all energy, perhaps extinguishing the initial reaction. If you knew enough about the process then if you could exclude the creation of the black spot and and in doing that sustain the energy release. But of course that is just wild speculation.
Fun thought: If you could create a powerful beam of those solitons you could aim it at stored weapons like tanks and ships guns bombs, missiles, over time the metal of the weapons would disintegrate. The first true weapon of peace.
I did the original interview that he referenced with the "black spot". I don't recall them mentioning a laser, but they claimed that it completely absorbed the ion beam they fired into it. At the time, they were completely mystified about the effect...
Omgeee!! Hyped for this one lol🙌🙌🤙
This is Observable Physics in Actuality, "perfectly obvious" quantization logic in e-Pi-i sync-duration resonance shell-horizons of phase-locked prime-cofactor frequency alignment of log-antilog Conformal Field Condensation, (not bs theory).
"Vibration in a Steam Room" of vertices in vortices, superposition phase-locked harmonic quantization reciprocation-recirculation bubble-modes.
Black holes, pseudo-monopoles, relic-neutrino-powered bio-transmutation.. veritable cornucopia isn't it? I usually don't have time to sit through a two-hour BG presentation that could be summarised in a short list of bullet points, most of which i'd instinctively challenge with alternative, usually more-prosaic interpretations; disassembling almost any one of his predicates or conclusions would be a separate discussion in itself; as ever, he needs a hard-nosed physicist collaborator to bounce ideas off and help whittle things down to less sweeping, often contentious assumptions..
In particular, what's missing is a treatment of the inevitable inter-reactions between condensing-matter systems and their surrounding environments, which in these types of experimental rigs are rarely if ever truly isolated; formation of quasi-bosons consolidates Fermi numbers, allowing ie. electrically-interacting free charged particles in the surrounding environment to drop down into vacated lower-energy states, potentially setting off a wider chain reaction that exchanges energy with the environment. This is one of the prospective mechanisms for opening the system to anomalous energy exchange that team Rossi have implicated; subsequent decoherence of large charge clusters back into discrete fermions thus creates a 'musical chairs' squeeze in which the formerly lower-energy states they vacated have now been reoccupied, forcing the vacuum to assign them higher quantum-energy states than they began with, and thus potentially opening the system to an effective 2LoT violation with the ZPE. Similarly, such precipitous drops in entropy may also constrain thermal degrees of freedom of a gas for embodying and expressing its heat, potentially opening the system to environmental energy exchange via adiabatic / isothermal cycling.
Are strange-radiation tracks ever seen to terminate, as if having dissipated all their energy, or are their estimated mass-energies only constrained by the detector thickness? Again, i'm challenging the assumption that their effective mass-energy is necessarily conserved, with all that entails - ie. ditto charge-clustering phenomena per se; active processes of environmental inter-reaction incorporating vacuum-polarising effects and ZPE exchange, the LENR perhaps facilitated through long-range p-p interactions between relatively-cool ions via the low-entropy electron condensate matrix. But enough hand-waving; good to see more attention being paid to the field - the only CMP that usually gets airtime are your typical academic headlines re. 'spin-polaritons in edge-defect topological insulators' etc. and what's lost in the general perception is that we're in the nascent era of exciting new branches of physics..
Yes, Bob has a super-high information density in his presentations!
I don't think the neutrino flux argument checks out, but the cymatic charge cluster explanation seems feasible, it's like a phonon extension to coupled clusters in QED
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coupled_cluster
If the process just eats up neutrino flux and the flux is basically constant how would the process ever end?
There would only be a maximum cap on the nuclear process and you wouldn't reduce it to zero
Unless it's a relative solar position thing, like the flux changes throughout the day because of the earth's relative position to the sun (flux_theta) & internal solar processes, which is feasible
Yeah, there are interesting experimental observations here - but the theory/explanation is going to need work.
Sounds like you caught yourself a right-handed neutrino clump to me. A member of the time reversed cyclic universe, which we are in parallel with. (Parallel? Merged, common, maybe better. Not a separate entity.)
Extremely heavy slow moving righr-handed neutrinos could be in the ball park of 433, if they clump in groups. So may be "dark matter", or a contributor to it. There are probably several types of DM, i would guess.
The black is interesting, and could possibly be analogous to the green oxidation on copper, allowing you to see the otherwise unseen. A shift in the interface, or boundary layer interaction.
These things could act as (as much as i dislike the word applied to science...) a portal into the mirror cyclic side, another state of time or space.
Neutrinos are really interesting - I want to do more on them in the future. So ubiquitous, but it seems like science tends to generally ignore them (and I understand why, because they aren't reactive...)
@@TimVenturaInterviews I completely agree with that. It's a classic case of "Out of sight, out of mind." They're just treated as something to ballance the equation for momentum... But like all things- the more you look, the more you see..
Conceptually, the, ion-eating black spot sounds like an analog to RAM that traps matter rather than EM energy.
Is there any known biological processes that could be impacted by this if observed in our biological natural world? Could our super-complicated biological photon detectors (our eyes) see something like this in say a bigger (say 2-3cm size) pattern? I've seen some weird things in darkrooms but, for me, OG photograph development is closer to biological than a CMOS sensor (as an example of newer tech). We were told it was the quality of the film/whatever back in the day but running the same negatives through negative digital scanners the quality of an output from negative to digital doesn't have the artifacts in the digital image - compared to enlarging photos in the closet darkroom circa 2003ish when we were proto-hipsters for having a darkroom in a rental flat. Thanks Tim for another great interview! (RIP apartment closet darkrooms) Edit: Thank you Bob as well - this is fascinating/so true stuff (in Canada, it's about a $100 in parts experiment 57:05)
Side note - "I had to move it to a different part of the lab" is the rabbit hole any science nerd needs to go down. It's a trip.
🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
Call me a skeptic. With all the resources we put into C.E.R.N. and the Standard Model; someone comes along with rotating metals that form a strange radiation that no one has seen before? Doubtful. Also, if you found a way to turn copper into gold, you'd be filthy rich and you could fund this research and live a fantastic lifestyle as well. Cheers.
agree.
So much talk and he often mentions:"oh and this guy did that too in 1968....""
The question you should be asking is why they build c ERn when Science has admitted That a Collider the size of the Milky Way galaxy Would still not have enough power To predict anything it's all bull politics and money grabs at this point
Scientists already make gold out of various objects is just so expensive it's not worth it
Is this fusion
Hang onto your hats!
Weird to see my name
Awesome ❤ great interview ! You both would be great on coasttocoast iam still in contact with lisa Lyon her office us in Medford Oregon great interview
Thanks John!
@@TimVenturaInterviews your welcome what. Your doing tim is epic keep up the great work !
@@klingonbaronessprincesskar5519 Thanks John - I know that you were a friend and colleague of Ken Shoulders for decades, and I am glad that Bob Greenyer is doing so much to honor and extend his work.