Fast 10: Neuroradiology high speed case review part 5 - Cases 41-50

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 15 сен 2024

Комментарии • 14

  • @caiyu538
    @caiyu538 Год назад +1

    That is the greatness of the lectures from social media. Some lectures present very textbook-standard cases while some lectures showed us the atypical cases. With the diversity of these great lectures, knowledge horizon becomes wider. Of course, it also makes us think deeper.

  • @suomynonaanonymous
    @suomynonaanonymous Год назад +3

    Thank you so much for taking the time to make these! They are excellent.

  • @semilunares
    @semilunares 2 месяца назад

    Thanks for the video! Very informative!

  • @salihbagouddinov5619
    @salihbagouddinov5619 Год назад +1

    Thank you so much

  • @hameedaklan
    @hameedaklan Год назад +1

    Great , thanks so much

  • @yusufa.1357
    @yusufa.1357 Год назад

    Great cases, thank you 😊

  • @wholewheatcrcka
    @wholewheatcrcka Год назад

    These are great, thank you!

  • @suomynonaanonymous
    @suomynonaanonymous Год назад +1

    Why does the subependymoma look like it has heterogenous central enhancement if non enhancing? Other examples I've seen showed absolutely no enhancement.

    • @LearnNeuroradiology
      @LearnNeuroradiology  Год назад +2

      That one does, and it's common to have a little bit of enhancement. However, it's much less enhancing than other tumors like ependymoma, central neurocytoma, and choroid plexus tumors

  • @mazukza
    @mazukza Год назад +1

    Great cases ❤