Это видео недоступно.
Сожалеем об этом.
A Serious Problem Has Arisen! The JWST Proves That There Are Objects Older than the Universe!
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 6 авг 2024
- A serious problem has emerged: The James Webb Space Telescope is showing us that there are objects in the observable universe that are older than the universe itself - and that can't be! In the telescope's images, we see rows and rows of galaxies that - if we follow the old standard models of physics and cosmology - must have formed long before the Big Bang. One thing is now certain, we have a flaw in the system and possibly everything we thought about the universe and everything we calculated is wrong!
![Everything Discovered from Year 2 of JWST. From Closest to Farthest [4K]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/wh4G1Wh79Ck/mqdefault.jpg)
![Everything Discovered from Year 2 of JWST. From Closest to Farthest [4K]](/img/tr.png)
I don’t think we know even a smidgeon of what is ‘real’.
I agree one hundred percent 💯 No one can possibly know ALL OF GOD'S WORKS 😁!
Can we ever know Biden's brain?
We don’t even know what real means.
All of the times and distances are wrong.
Red shift is not the be all end all metric
@@zadestrujillo1804 God?
“We don’t know even half the mysteries in the🌍. We are Strangers…wandering in the Dark.”
*Alles ist Verbundun.☦️ Johann 1:1 THiS iS The Origin. Jesus/The LOGOS Head of The Triune Lord said, “Let there be Light.” & Yes, it was 13 & a half Billion years ago.
The Big Bang theory is WRONG, and you just NOW realize THIS???🎉😢
The BB theory is still perfectly reasonable. There may be some discussion whether it describes the whole universe or just that part visible to us, though.
Nope it’s been obvious for years that the standard model is fiction
Normalization, wtf. If you fudge the numbers in a mathematical model it means nothing.
@@WideCuriosity Reasonable except that in order to conform with observations, the theorists claimed that at some stage the expansion of the universe accelerated faster than light, which seems both inconsistent with Einstein and frankly implying intervention from someone or something to speed up the process (although they never acknowledged a deity). Hoyle's steady state model seemed more sensible and maybe we will have to go back to that.
Einstein said words to the effect that nothing with mass can move at light speed, there was no mention of barring faster than light speed (think tachyons). The stretching or creation of space is also not related to Einstein's equations or theory.
@@WideCuriosity
BB isn't reasonable for a lot of different reasons.
If it was true you would be able to pinpoint where it happened. But we cant. And scientist wont even consider a deity cause that's against some dumb rule ..... but yet ..... all their discoveries point to some form of intelligence.
Even evolution points to some form of consciousness, because your eye cant evolve into an eye........ unless SOMETHING already knows about photons to be able to construct an eye to be able to use photons. In other words, you don't build a gas powered car ........ unless you already know about gasoline. Otherwise how would you even KNOW to make a gas tank?
Next you have things in space (galaxies) that aren't even supposed to be there.
You can't exist before youre born. Just as a galaxy can't exist before the birth of the universe. So Big Bang is just WRONG.
Either that or we are looking at optical illusions in space of things that aren't really there.
Lets put it this way , our known Universe is one street block in a Universe much biger then you can Imagine.
That's kinda what I've been saying. That cone they use for our visible universe is only one cone. Imagine it as one piece of pizza. I say there are another 11 pieces of the pizza going all the way around. So another 11 cones from our big bang. Everything didn't expand in one direction. It would have expanded in all directions
Mankind knows nothing of the void.
Many NDE experiences talk about traveling through the universe and entering into a long darkness until seeing a light.
The Void is often found between one ear and another.
The Universe is too orderly t be formed from a large explosion.
ya think? it seems anything but orderly.
It wasn't an explosion, it was an expansion. Think blowing up a ballon with air....
It would inevitably sort itself out in one form or another according to the forces acting upon & influencing it. Whether it is "orderly" or in "chaos" is in the eye of the beholder.
There is no order really. May be the order of the universe but not order in any way from what we perceive as order. There's chaos everywhere. Nova, supernova, black holes swallowing stars. What order are you claiming?
The Big Bang may just have been a localised event (relatively) with such events occurring in other sectors and time
It’s obvious that there are other universes, our arrogance prevents us from seeing this mankind must rise above their vainglorious self
And religious limitations. Look at facts, not folklore! We are a minuscule piece of the wonder all around us.
You have hard evidence of this obvious thing ? I suspect it is supposition & conjecture at this point.
The way this video breaks down the significance of discovering galaxies like JADES-GS-z13 is truly engaging. It's incredible to think that our understanding of the universe might be fundamentally flawed, and this video captures that excitement perfectly.
Theory---
What if our universe ISN'T the only one?
What if our universe is just one of many expanding universes and we're beginning to see overlap between universes? Like, if you can see far enough you're actually looking into another universe.
Or perhaps we're just an unimaginably tiny speck of matter in an unbelievably huge universe?
Maybe we're a mote in an explosion of matter, living unimaginably fast compared to the rest of the universe?
on the other side of our 2 dimension vision of the universe, which should be 4 dimensial
@@d.m.westdorp8741 WE DO live in a 4 dimensional creation currently
Science hasn't reached a dead end. It's a continuing process of discovery.
It is so interesting to see the modern development of astronomy.
This video is a classic.
The commentary is very objective and a good source of deep space information.
But before the big bang,there was the dark matter bang.
The universe had a beginning.
This universe you see an marvel at will pass away but HIS WORDS WILL STILL REMAIN.
In the beginning was the WORD,,,,,,...
Infinite Universe seems to be the most logical answer at least for me. And infinite evolution sometimes good sometimes bad we don't have to look to far
People forget that time is a concept, not a thing. To say that it took light to travel 13.8 billion years at the speed of light it's like saying it took almost a second at 13.8 billion times faster than light speed doesn't mean the universe is a second old. Also, to assume that things have to come from a point and then expand to a void with everything else empty is wrong. What if the universe was not empty to begin with and popped things into place simultaneously and began interacting or moving relative to each other? Don't be trapped by your assumptions of what you don't know or see.
I believe our distance formulas are not accurate due curvature of the cosmos.
no matter how much we want to know about the universe we will always go back to square one, the universe is full of surprises
no, they just moved away from our point of view
James Web can find all this, yet can't find planet x, go figure
Donate space in your computer, toward counting the different shapes of galaxy s in the universe. Make a statement.
I really wonder why it's so hard to understand... redshift = time dilation. So what seems to have happened within 300 million years at that distance actually happened in 4 billion years from their perspective.
It seems simple to you because you are simple.
Red shift has many known and more unknown affiliations. There is an interstellar medium, nothing does not exist, the void is not empty, and therefore not a void.
Neil Tyson doesn't know the difference between an x and y. I wouldn't recommend including him in science anymore.
Neil Degrasshole
He’s a fucking asset of the big science pharm military complex.
I agree. He's a hack
Truth
Maybe it is just a reflection, that why it seems older then it is?
No , it just proves the universe been around waaay longer than our shifty estimate
Theories that don't explain everything are not necessarily wrong. It's more likely that they are merely incomplete. It's how science tends to progress.
Edit: also it's more likely that folk were surprised and the results surprising than they were shocked and it was shocking. Your sensationalist style of data presentation could do with a brush-up.
I wonder if whoever put this headline up has considered that the statement can't be accurate? The objects aren't as old as thought to be?, the universe is older than it's though to be?, and telescopes don't prove or disprove anything....they just gather light?. It also isn't a serious problem, only theories may need adjusting again when more is learned which happens all the time. Clickbait headlines indicate desperation for views.
The narrator needs to fix it it’s not Jades 13
The only misleading thing this guy is saying is it’s Jades 13 but its really Jades-GS-z14-0
Alpha et Omega: always has been always will be ! Silly humans ! and their guesses! Are they still looking for the Aether? All the Big Bang/ Dark Matter theory s just ... poor hoo/man ants ! Can t figure it out-- with our limited capacitys...
Why won't we accept this truth; if we can't make it, we don't understand it. All science is just a guess. If we understand nature, then someone should make a blade of grass; from nothing.
Your asumptions are wrong, the Univrrse has always bin, you guys are the one's who want to put your bigining time.
Trillions of Galaxies originated from a Tiny Speck . Total BS
Jewish space lasers - fact or fiction?
Ah; it's found the lips of God, I see.
As Michio Kaku so aptly said, we now need to rewrite the textbooks...
We have known for at least a year that there is a lot wrong with our standard model of the cosmos and in particular the Big Bang theory. So let's try something different!
How about a cyclical universe that is constantly renewing and reshaping itself, from one universe generation to the next, so to speak? We can observe this process everywhere in nature here on Earth, which is also just a reflection of our "big home", the universe!
The cosmos created itself in a logical, wonderfully natural way, but we humans need complicated answers to things that aren´t actually that difficult to understand, but which we make really complicated with our higher physics and experiments (like the the Large Hadron Collider | CERN)... 🔭
The cobwebs of your mother's secret place are older than the universe. Musty
The Big Bang theory was similar to religion in that it gave us an answer to what we didn't understand. However just like religion, as new scientific discoveries that were made in the past and recently it became obvious that these theories are all wrong. Cosmologists I would think, would rejoice that they are living during a time that we are able to realize we really don't know anything for sure.
If there are galaxies "older than the universe" then the Bible's so called gap "theory" is the gap fact.
Genesis 1:1-4.
Also, this pretty much kills the literal six days creation idea. Then the six days narrative really is a beautiful God inspired poem about the Creation. This would especially be true in that the JWST has proven what Einstein said over a century ago that "time does not exist. We invented it".
Once again, we see God is way way way way way way more intelligent and complex than is puny man.
Wrong starting point, wrong conclusion!
Try Genesis 2:5, start there!
If the new galaxies don't fir the age of the universe, just change the age of the universe! Typical science. If the existing theory doesn't fit the existing narrative, just change the narrative! I'll stick with Genesis 1:1.
That is the basis of science. If the observations don't match the theory then the theory needs to be modified or maybe abandoned. That does not make science wrong. Just the opposite.
Neil Tyson is trying to be dramatic like his idol, Carl Sagan. Good grief!
These cosmologist try out guessing each other. Their crazy theories are comedy.
The universe didn’t create itself. God created the universe and everything in it 🙏🏻✝️
I believe God created earth, not sure about the universe. But where did God come from a different dimension?
@@jefferynaffziger7857 God has always been. He is the Almighty forever and ever. Do you not believe in God the Almighty? And in Jesus Christ His only Son and your Savior if you accept it
One day scientists will acknowledge The Creator YHWH
MOST DEFINITELY 💯👍😁!
Yepp
Heisenberg said “the first gulp from the glass of natural sciences will make you an atheist but at the bottom of the glass God is waiting for you.”
YHWH? Not everyone knows trendy interwebs abbreviations. I wish people would stop using them.
@@Guvament_bs YHWH is not an abbreviation at all