F-35, Top Gun and Finland - Colonel (retd) Scott Davis Part 1
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 8 сен 2024
- Let's talk fighter jets, in two parts! Scott Davis, callsign "Lurch", is a fighter pilot with over 3600 flight hours in the F-15, F-16, F-18 and F-22 fighters. He's also attended and instructed at the TOPGUN courses in both US Navy and US Air Force. He now works for Lockheed Martin in the Nordics and he came on our show to talk to us about his career and the F-35, which is the new fighter jet for the Finnish Air Force.
In this first part of the series we talk about Scott's career through TOPGUN schools and what it was like to write the playbook for the first 5th generation fighters. We also discuss the differences between generations and especially how the 4th and 5th generation airframes differ. What's dog fighting like in a 4th generation versut 5th generation airplane?
SECOND PART HERE: • Part 2: F-35, Top Gun,...
You can get our patch from Varusteleka: www.varustelek...
Check out our amazing partners! We trust their gear, and so should you!
Savox Communications - the best solutions for critical communications worldwide.
savox.com/ @SavoxCommunications
Savotta Load bearing equipment made for extreme conditions. Made deep inside of Finland's forests!
www.savotta.fi/ @Savotta
Ever heard of Varusteleka? You should have! Check them out to shop the best tactical equipment with a Nordic twist. They ship worldwide, AND they're the good guys! www.varusteleka.com/en @varusteleka
Follow us where ever you get your daily dose of social media! We suggest you head to our Instagram @mighty_finland_
Original thumbnail photo: @LockheedMartin
![Megan Thee Stallion - Neva Play (feat. RM) [Official Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/TpYTyAaTRts/mqdefault.jpg)
Great interview and guest. Peace to our Finish brothers from an ex British soldier.
Hattu nousee taistelijaparille kielitaidosta. Lisää vaan mielenkiintoisia ulkkis vieraita ja mielenkiintoisia aiheita.👍
Cool guy! He also spoke very decent Finnish!
Todella sujuvaa ja mielenkiintoista ilmasotahenkistä tarinaa. Kiitoksia.
Kiitoksia! Pian tulee kakkososa!
What a guest! Massive respect for this great and humble gentleman. This guy has some real life experience regarding multiple jet fighter types.
Excellent interview Villes! Keep up the good work guys.
He indeed spoke (and pronounced) near fluent Finnish! Respect 🤜🤛
Timanttista settiä täälläkin kertaa! Ja lontoo taittuu Ville&Villeltä erinomaisen sujuvasti!
Kiiiiitos!
Great podcast. A man who knows his stuff and has lived in Finland. Nice.
@@apuuvah and u decide who knows and who doesnt and are above these guy$?
Top Gun gets all the love. But Red Flag is another hallmark program of US air combat.
The guest is so cool! This has to be one of my favourite episodes (like the one with Theo Boyrie / Combat Arms Channel)
WOW, what a career he had!!!
Tää oli yksi parhaista lentoaiheisista videoista joita olen nähnyt. Mielenkiintoisia yksityiskohtia esim. 5gen vs 4gen hävittäjien kohtaamisesta.
Loistavaa kuulla!
Without having listened longer than a few mins into the episode; the F-35 is the only contender in the HX-program that could fill the requirement for support until 2060. That alone weighs a lot in the final choice.
I remember that both F35 and the Gripen filled the requirements and thus got tested further.
Gripen did aswell. But the most definiting factor was that a fight would be done in a vacuum Finland all alone. The chosen fighter was deemed the most survivable in that scenario. Sadly it also totally negated the strongest argument for gripen as sweden could never not be involved in a conclict in the nordic territory. Eather way it was not bad choice in the end. It the price stays. But with norway as an example that does not speak in favour of it.
With the trend of 6gen fifhters bow and the NGAD being questioned one can ask if the very long service life with be the preferred one. As of now its fine but it a very limited platform that can not easily take changes.
@@henafoo The Gripen placed the lowest of all contenders in H-X, with scores so low they were not published by Finland. It did not even approach the threshold requirements in any of the 5 evaluation areas. The only contender that came close was the Super Hornet, but it did not meet the overall threshold of 4/5, registering 3.81/ 4. F-35A total scoring was 4.47/5. Swedish media revealed that the Gripen score in H-X was 2.8/5. Finland was very smart in leveraging the prospects of the Gripen being awarded to put pressure on Lockheed to sweeten the deal even more for Finland, even though Finnish Air Force had really pretty much decided it was going with F-35A back in 2014.
@@LRRPFco52 Of the 5 offers to the HX, 3 offers got to final evaluation phase. F-35, Gripen and F-18 super hornet. So no it was not the lowest as two didn't even get to the final phase. Also the document put out by finnish defence ministery, the scoring was not included. So I'm going to consider with a block of salt any scoring given out by other sources.
@@henafoo I followed H-X throughout the entire process from 2014-2021, with an acute eye to details. The Rafale F4 and Typhoon were eliminated early due to refusal to do any industrial sharing, plus the unit costs for each of those is in the 150-168 million Euro unit flyaway, over 200 million unit program costs. F-35A is $77.9m in Lot 14, while Finnish Block 4 F-35As will be $83m Unit Flyaway.
It was an extremely detailed and well-run evaluation that placed the performance requirements into 5 major categories. Those results were in fact recorded with overall scores, the top 2 of which were published.
Thank you for sharing that.
It was one of the most engaging interviews I have seen in a very long time. I'm pretty sure you only scratched the surface of the stories that retired Colonel has to tell.
What an interesting Gentleman.
Talking about call signs: one of the coolest must be Obi2 (or Obi-Two) in UK. Those who know they know...
Part 2, when? Really good guest can't wait for more!
Tomorrow! Thanks!
Drinking game: You drink everytime when someone says Top Gun 😎😁
Tier 1 guest! Good catch.
Thanks!
Tilattu kanava. Tää oli ihan helvetin mielenkiintoinen.
Nättii, kiitti! Lisää tulee!
Cool guy with good stories.
I’m dying over here after that Lurch story. A 36” inseam is really long, so imagining him in USAF dress As with 26” high waters is absolutely hilarious, especially having to show up for the Hughes award.
Scott Davis, it sounds like we might have been in KEF at the same time. I hung out at the FIS bar quite frequently
AI stealth drone wingmen will start flying with 5th generation, but that was the first thing that came to mind about 6th generation.
I forget who, but it was on former F14 RIO Ward Carroll's channel when he interviewed a TOPGUN guy: one word, don't ask.
Olisipa mukava jos tekstityksiin tulisi Suomessa suomeksi automaatti käännös.Englannin kieltä ei ole aivan militaristisanoilla tullut täydennettynä viime aikoina.Muutaman kerran kun testailisi niin ehkä korva harjaantuisi puhekieleen.Kiitos.
No pain no gain!
i also watch those naval aviation guys, like Growler jams, and others...so 'Top Gun' is quite low on my list of "authoritative sources"!
And, growing up in a military family (even my Mother worked in "8 Bombing & Gunnery" in WW II!), i learned very early that "Hollywood" and "military experiences" were not very similar...
How does air combat take place at the stage when Russia has stealth fighters? When everyone has stealth fighters, the stealth advantage disappears. Will we then return to air battles that occur within visual range? Dogfights, etc.
I would give a like, but then I would mess up the interesting count it stands rn...
I'm interested in what a 5th gen vs 5th gen fighter looks like, I would imagine radar missiles are pretty much useless, and it comes down to the merge, maneuverability, heatseekers and guns.
I think it goes down to loitering missiles and trying to use other radar systems to find the foe to guide those loitering missiles to the assumed direction where the enemy could be.
Where was the discussion about the F-35?
More in the next part, coming out tomorrow!
Wow whatta man.
Can it be expressed as every next generation is designed to beat the former one? Every generation has of course its own lifespan.
Good point!
Se o hauskaa kattoa kun suomalaisessa videossa puhutaan enkkua niin suomalaiset kommentoi enkuksi
Why are you wearing headphones, you are in the same room!
It's fun! (And its good for sound quality!)
Milloin toinen jakso!? :)
Huomenna!
It's kinda funny? I have done my mandatory military service 1 year + 3 times a peace keeping mission 1 year each. Seen alot, done some and still... I feel I'm just a regular civilian.
SECOND PART OUT NOW: ruclips.net/video/wRi3pErELao/видео.html
Keskellä ei mitään:
Huitsin Nevadassa
Mistähän syystä tossa 11 minuutin kohdalla on leikattu klippi pois kun olis juuri puhunu 6 gen hävittäjistä?
🤫 hys hys. Naapuri kuuntelee nämä podit hyvin tarkalla korvalla.
Näitä valitettavasti jokunen jaksoihin tuli, mutta kuuluu hommaan, kun tehdään jaksoa näinkin ison ja merkittävän firman edustajan kanssa. Kuitenkin paljon pieniä OpSec juttuja, jotka vähän siinä rajamailla, niin kaikkien tahojen etu, että hieman punakynää joudutaan käyttämään 👍
@@ZeAngrySnowmongol Tätä itsekin arvelin syyksi👍🏼
Coolio
Gangsta paradise
was there even a tender that looked at other nations than the usa? i mean you do know they exist right?
typhoon, gripen etc - both cheaper - both more multi-task-mission capable with no requirement to hide weapons inside the bay (larger weapon carrying capacity) etc....
or was lokheed there lobbying the competition out of the field asap?
as a finn, i appreciate the fancy but super expensive hardware which isthe f35 - very sexy, but we are less than 5 mio taxpayers.
Do we really need the stealth fighters when we are right next to the bad guy who can see our airfields and planes if he opens the window and owns a binocular?
So what planes have been considered, and how was the decision process and reasoning from finnish perspective to go for f35? instead of a gripen or typhoon?
can i get a unbiased answer to that? This is basically the taxpayer asking for transparency on the procurement process.
cheers
Tuntuu kuin tää podcast katkeaisi kesken :/
Hiukan se tekikin, huomenna tulee lisää!
Finland shouldve supported jas. Its a failure!
Little Fascist Speed Bumps......
Even Top Gun taught as that air defense picks these aeroplanes up so they're pretty much useless as a combat. U know there's no canyons everywhere where you can fly below SAM's radar ehh...
The distance from which target acquisition radars can track the aircraft is significantly reduced in stealth aircraft. It doesn't matter so much in an air superiority fight over our own territory wether the enemy AD battery knows someone is there somewhere while not being able to guide weapons at them.
If we really are going for the throat, so to speak, and take on the enemy AD installations head on there are specialized long range anti-radiation weapons for that spesific task as well as other ground attack capable stand-off munitions that can fit the interior weapons bay.
Not everything has to be done in the hard way when easier ways exist.
Wow you're so smart. You should work at Lockheed Martin.
@@herptek f35 isnt stealth aircraft
Wrong. Only high flying radars (AWACS, fighter, UAV...) can see what's happening below. Radars need line of sight.
P-troll.
It's a plane that is too expensive for Finland and will cause reduction in the size of the defence forces in about 20 years time, just like the FA-18 did.
lol, F-18 had nothing to do with reduction in the size. It was the whole Euro crisis and collapse of Nokia that caused the reforms, which in some sense were overdue. Before that the size and tactics were already somewhat old fashioned. Now, of course in the best case scenario, more mobile and better equipped and trained troops can do the same as the more unflexible larger force.
Another bot I see
Taitaa sulla unohtua pikku asioita mitä tapahtuu 90-2000 luvulla jotka saattoi vaikuttaa asioihin...
@@teemup9247 Kun meikä on 20 vuoden päästä oikeassa, olette te kaikki jankkaajat jo varoitukset unohtaneet ja tilalle on kehitetty uusia tekosyitä. Sitten tilalle ostetaan jälleen uusi käyttötarkoitukseen sopimaton ja liian kallis pökäle ja homma toistuu.
@@td6460 Katsotaan sitten 20 vuoden päästä, tosin uskon että olet aika väärässä.
Stupid.
Finland Jooning NATO: mOST STUPID MOVE.
Nope
Yeah, because makins sure you have working defense is stupid. Said no one ever.
From a russian perspective, yes.