Was "Molech" a God?
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 13 авг 2020
- We often hear about the child sacrifices that were made to the god "Molech/Moloch" in the Old Testament... but was this really a divine being? Should we interpret the Hebrew phrase LMLK differently? Dr. Heath Dewrell gives us his take on the issue.
For the full interview, click here: • Child Sacrifice in Anc...
𒀭Support Digital Hammurabi!𒀭
Books by Digital Hammurabi Press:
NEW!
The Atheist Handbook to the Old Testament
Joshua Bowen (2021)
(tinyurl.com/4jj2tcny)
Learn to Read Ancient Sumerian for the Absolute Beginner
Joshua Bowen & Megan Lewis (2020)
(tinyurl.com/yatg8ty3)
Did the Old Testament Endorse Slavery?
Joshua Bowen (2020)
(tinyurl.com/y6uytbkv)
Learning to Pray in a Dead Language: Education and Invocation in Ancient Sumerian
Joshua Bowen (2020)
(tinyurl.com/2f5rd7tc)
Patreon - bit.ly/2EJVEdj
PayPal - bit.ly/2PUp49A
Shirts and Chandise - bit.ly/2QKAuSH
Amazon Wishlist - amzn.to/2CsDhak
Website - bit.ly/2V0ZaVw
Twitter - bit.ly/2T6uJLV
Contact - digitalhammurabi@gmail.com
----------
For general information and sources relating to the Ancient Near East, we recommend these websites:
ABZU - bit.ly/2Cr1A8u (collection of free and open-access data)
University of Chicago Oriental Institute - bit.ly/2RcIiMl (great collection of free books and articles)
Livius.org - bit.ly/2Gzj5rx (general encyclopedia on the ancient world)
ETCSL - bit.ly/2QJsAZS (Sumerian literature)
ORACC - bit.ly/2QJsL7u (collection of projects relating to Mesopotamia)
EPSD - bit.ly/2PY99aw (Online Sumerian dictionary)
CDLI - cdli.ucla.edu (Cuneiform Digital Library Initiative)
----------
Music: Brak Bnei Original Composition 
Развлечения
Very good selection for a highlight. Thank you.
Allen Ginsberg used Moloch in his 1956 poem Howl, as a symbol of everything that was wrong with American capitalism, war, uncontrolled technology, prisons, injustice, etc. When I first read Ginsberg's poems, I didn't realize how much scholarship went into them. I recommend one of the recordings of Ginsberg reading it himself, which are easily found on the internet.
I really appreciate the level of scholarship these guys present in bite size pieces so everyone can assimilate and understand
so much information in such a short space of time. Great as always.
Thank you for this informative piece, I have been finding myself very interested in the anthropological/linguistic aspect of religious development. Extremely interesting and answers a ton of questions by providing context!
Oh man so glad you posted this. I was just reading leviticus and trying to understand the scholar view on Molech as a process of sacrifice vs Molech as a God
It is a demon. It hasn't changed, they still do it in sects of satanic religions all over the world by all types of evil persons.
@@roseychicka2298 Try a little more rationality and less alarmism. Jeez, everything indicates that there was no 'god' named Moloch
Yeah same here, I have to say I read it as Molech being a god that others had worshipped prior when reading Leviticus. Also how bad is Leviticus, the bible has really gone down hill since the story of Joseph lol.
@@MelancoliaI correct. There is "No God Named Molech". That was a statue named Molech. There's only ONE GOD, the Creator.
Except when you realize quite of a few stories in the Bible are actual Sumerian story retellings, meaning there indeed were multiple "Gods" and "The Lord", as he liked to call himself, was simply one of these beings. He even demands that people worship no other Gods than him and mentions other Gods directly out of his own mouth.
Sacrificing children must have been what fallen angels or demons wanted men to do for them,cause when God suggested Abraham do for him, but while God was testing Abraham, the fallen angels demanded sacrifice in order to mock God, while glorifying themselves.either way,something had to deceive people for them to willingly sacrifice their children.
Molek/Molok/Melech means King. During summer (sun in northern hemisphere) he is the good sun (God). During winter (sun in southern hemisphere) he is the evil sun (Satan).
"I (the Sun) form the light and create darkness; I make peace (summer), and create evil (winter). I, the Lord (Sun) do all these things" (Isaiah 45.7).
Even King Solomon (King Sun) did evil during winter when the sun was below the equator. He will soon begin construction of the Temple of God (sacred seven) which is your body.
The "destruction" of the biblical temple is nothing more than the end of the seven months beginning at the spring equinox and transition to the remaining five months of the sacred year (spring equinox - spring equinox).
The basic astronomical chart is displayed in Genesis one. The six nights are the six months/signs that begins, in the sign of the scales, at the fall equinox and ends at the spring equinox in the sign of the fishes.
The six days are the six months/signs that begins in the sign of the Ram at the spring equnox and ends with the sign of the Virgin at the fall equinox.
The devouring of the children is nothing more than the consumption of the crops that are saved from the harvest (sign of the genitals aka Scorpio). This is symboled by the Virgin holding a bundle of wheat/barley in her left hand (symbols winter). The Virgin hold a Palm frond/branch in her right hand (symbols summer). See Isaiah 9.14-15, where Israel (summer) has a noble/royal head aka Leo and a lying tail aka Scorpio.
The story of Sodom (Scorpio) and Gomorrah (Sagittarius) is about the punishment for not sharing the crops. The two daughters of Lot (hidden one) represents these crops. The mother (Virgo constellation) has a slight turn to her face and she cannot avoid "looking back." The daughters and mother is the same Virgo constellation..
What about Jepthahs daughter?
@Heavy Metal Pulp
You will find many excellent references in "Science of the Bible," by Milton Woolley.
@Heavy Metal Pulp
Try Science of the Bible or Hebrew Mythology.
@@Soohable
The Ram, in this myth, was the Lord.
Appreciate this channel so much. ❤
The Moleck God was a God that foreigners worshipped. In 1st kings they speak about Solomon having alot of wives that worshipped other God's and Moleck was one of them.
Very very good work.
In I Kings 11:5 and 7, the text places Ashtoreth, Milcom, Chemosh, and Molech in parallel, which would seem to imply that that author regarded Molech as a deity of some sort as opposed to a type of sacrifice.
אַחֲרֵ֣י עַשְׁתֹּ֔רֶת אֱלֹהֵ֖י צִדֹנִ֑ים
וְאַחֲרֵ֣י מִלְכֹּ֔ם שִׁקֻּ֖ץ עַמֹּנִֽים׃
לִכְמוֹשׁ֙ שִׁקֻּ֣ץ מוֹאָ֔ב
וּלְמֹ֕לֶךְ שִׁקֻּ֖ץ בְּנֵ֥י עַמּֽוֹן׃
the video is trying to miss lead people. god did not want child sacrifices. its when the jews started worshiping other gods that they started to do this.
Actually the only god or goddess mentioned is Ashtoreth. The rest are refered to as Shikutz which means abominations. They could easily be rites, idols, or foreign traditions. I actually speak Hebrew so know what I'm talking about.
@@yishaymontgomery
Mordechai Cogan (Anchor Bible) also speaks Hebrew. He sees a substitution here of shiqutz for elohim (elohai…)
1 Kings 11:5
"and Milcom, the abomination of the Ammonites"
A purposeful alteration of “god of the Ammonites”; so also of Chemosh and Milcom in v. 7. But cf. v. 33 for the unaltered text. Hebrew šiqqūṣ denotes a detestable, loathsome object, mostly said of idols, and is often used in Deuteronomy, Dtr, and late prophecy, e.g., Deut 7:26 (*šqṣ // *tꜥb, “abhor”); 29:16; Isa 66:3; Ezek 5:11.
"Milcom."
Besides the current context, the name of this Ammonite deity is known from extrabiblical inscriptions; see DDD cols. 1076-80. In a number of instances in MT, it is misvocalized as malkām, “their king,” as in 2 Sam 12:30; Jer 49:3; Zeph 1:5.
1 Kings 11:7
"Then Solomon built a high place for Chemosh, the abomination of Moab."
The chief god of the Moabites; cf. Num 21:29; Jer 48:46; known from the Mesha Inscription (Cogan and Tadmor 1988, Appendix 1, no. 1) and the names of Moabite kings and private persons; see DDD cols. 356-62.
Reference:
Cogan, Mordechai. I KINGS. The Anchor Yale Bible. 1.4. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1974.
@@carloswhitefalcon I'm just bringing it up. Shikutz is a vague term for any rite or material object that is in opposition to YHWH. Mordecai Cogan is suggesting a use for the word that is different to the one that is commonly known.
@@yishaymontgomery
Indeed. Shikutz is a general term that can encapsulate many things. From what I understand, it's not uncommon for substitutions like this to occur in the Bible in order to cast dispersions on foreign deities, worship, activities, etc. For example that is probably happening with bosh for ba'al, in Ish-bosheth rather than Eshbaal. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ish-bosheth#Problem_of_naming
Great segment.
Could it work if the foreign God was Ba'al Hadad? Assuming the Kenite Hypothesis is correct, Hadad would have been the "old god" of the Caananites, whereas Yahweh replaced him. As an extension of this, could we assume that there were some late Hadad loyalists in the Yahweh Era? After all, Jeremiah refers to the Hinnom alters as alters to Ba'al
God hates Ba'al for polluting the Israelites with the baby sacrifice, so it might have been Ba'al Hadad (but was probably Ba'al Hamon), and since foreign influence tended to end in religious syncretization, the Ba'als telling people to sacrifice babies to God as "Ba'al Molech" was probably the last straw for a Good and Loving God.
@@autobotstarscream765 The god of the OT is anything but good and loving. He is a nasty piece of narcissistic sh*t. Good thing he doesn’t actually exist.
Moloch is the god of Amonnites, or children of Ammon.
Baal-Hammon was the chief god who was claimed to be "king of God", asking people for children sacrifices.
In Leviticus 18:21 and 20 says that Yahweh was extremely furious about people and gods who were doing sacrifices.
Yahweh is not Moloch. Yahweh is a draconian angel who fought for humanity's morality and common sense. He's a natural warrior.
Obviously, these ideas of comparing Moloch and Yahweh is a distraction to lose faith.
Baal-Hadad is twin brother of Enki and is not Moloch (baal-Hammon).
The word "Baal" is a title like "president". I would recommend you to research how many baal existed in those times.
Not all baals were evil. Hammurabi wasn't evil for example.
@@autobotstarscream765 God killed millions of children in floods, he sent a bear to kill two kids who mocked a bald man. He is just as evil as Moloch.
They are in the bohemian grove in front of a great owl statue still doing it today, so I imagine it was a god..
Yes they are. How can people be this blind?
Barack Obama and Jimmy Buffett aren’t Jewish.... OR CANAANITES, so it’s not the Dane thing. Owls have nothing to do with tyranny either. Owls are wise .
@@MrDizzyvonclutch Obama is Jewish tho
@@jmello1168 you can’t be a Muslim and a Jew at the same time, sorry bub, he’s a MUSLIM!
@@MrDizzyvonclutch you can because all of these religions are of the same universe so why can’t you be one I don’t think Obama is a Muslim but a Zionist and that’s from Jewish decent
molech was also in new york, in wall street, isn't it?
What’s a great book to learn more about this I am Fascinated to learn way more
False Gods or The Idol Worship of The World. I learned about Molech through this book.
It covers all types of false worship of many cultures with black and white pics of the deities.
Thank you so much!!!
Very interesting. I never knew!
I see a lot of owl iconography in logos lately . I heard that the owl is associated with witchcraft and Molech.
The owl statue is in the bohemian Grove
The owl has in the west represented minerva; the roman goddess of wisdom. Or the greek Athenia. No doubt its had many representations though the millenia as they are very compelling creatures.
I heard it was a bird.
Are you saying that making a certain type of sacrifice was wrong? To prove something shouldn't you take us through some verses that give us context to show how this was not a sacrifice to something? It says in Lev 18:21 that the Israelite's should not let their seed pass through the fire and that God says not to worship as the Caananites did. He says that's why he drove them out of that land. Smith's Bible Dictionary says that Molech was described by Jewish Scholars as being a idol that looked like at bulls head and man's body and that the idol was heated up and babies were placed on the alter and quote "gave up the ghost" so why would Jewish scholars who obviously spoke Hebrew and obviously knew who the Phenicians were have a different description from you? Plus the message here, was that in Leviticus God was asking the Israelites to dedicate their firstborn children to him. You should give a better explaination that to say you interpret it as "with" Molech rather than "to" Molech. You really skirt around answering this question so I feel if you can't answer it fully with support from the Bible and perhaps some other references then don't speak about it. Today people are also said to sacrifice to Molech because of all the abortions that are happening. I think this subject requires a deeper explanation than what you gave.
Have you had a chance to watch the longer interview this clip is a part of? It explains his argument in more detail.
it's funny how this idea got spread and distorted that there were these baby sacrifices made inside the statues. I clearly remember my grandmother telling to me about them when I wad a child, but she said these were sacrifices made to Buddha. 😂😂
That's really interesting, actually. I wonder how Buddha entered the picture 🤔
@@tompaine4044 To a christian mind Buddha = satan. XD
@@tompaine4044 its a different religion
pass the blame off
@TheCoolCarlWheezer broad-brush much? and is your second sentence intended to be hilariously ironic?
I think your grandma might’ve confused the moloch ritual with a Buddhist “living Buddha” but afaik there’s only one statue with an actual monk inside, most are just monks who meditated until they died.
I’m no expert but I wouldn’t use anecdotes told by family as a citable source of information, unless of course they’re an expert in the field of which they’re speaking, otherwise it’s just opinion, informed or otherwise
Hahaha. I like your channel's name.
As a graduated student of Archaeology (M.A) living in Jerusalem, I had issues with it till i went to a lecture of Dr. Ziony in the Albright Institute. And as far I can remember, he said it was a matter of translating the test, he didn't believe there were physical child sacrifice, passing isn't passing as we understand passing through. Not to mention no evidence in the ground of such practices in the field.
I remember writing a paper of the Tophet and I concluded till you find one in Jerusalem you can make up of it anything you want , i too concluded no child sacrifice were made (although I am not a linguistic expert), that Josiah and Hezekiah's "reform" were local and not national, and I got an "A".
With this piece of information i am more convinced.
Another urban legend i debunked is that during the 2nd Temple period garbage was burned in the Hinnon valley, that is a medieval legend which people still repeating till today. I recently made a walking video in the valley clarifying this myth. I am a tour guide too😉
Wow
"I got an A on this paper" automatically a historical scholar hahaha
You getting an A on a paper means absolute shite
@@WillyWonka235 You are right! Since you mentioned and to clarify, my M.A was in Archaeology not history, 2- I didn't get just an "A" but straight A, graduating with honors (summa cum laude).
Instead of trying to insult people or disqualified them, look inwardly and check what you have done in life.
You have a good day!
@@IsraelSuperguide Ive actually accomplished quite a bit myself but Im not here toting about it. Long story short...you just make yourself sound pompus and foolish, but as you said Have a great day!
How would social dynamics work within that group if the majority didn’t accept that child sacrifice “it’s just part of it” at the very least. If only some within a group would approve and perform child sacrifice, wouldn’t it be reasonable to assume that at one time or another, the sacrificers would be disposed of?
I am not an expert on this subject.
There is a biblical basis for this type of sacrifice which muddied the waters (discussed further in the interview this segment was drawn from-- in short: sacrificing first fruits and firstborns). Add to that the understanding that children are pretty much their parents' property and perhaps the understanding that sacrificing one's children was efficacious in certain circumstances and it seems like it could definitely be a subject to be debated as a matter of interpretation within the group versus seeing it as a completely foreign practice.
Based on the biblical account we can at least assume that some people spoke out against child sacrifice publicly, but in every religion there will always be people who are not "doing it" correctly: differences only become heresies ("disposable" offenses?) when it offends the deity in question. It seems like this was eventually the consensus (or we just have writings from the anti-human sacrifice group) of Israelites.
I'm curious about social interactions between these groups, too, but I don't think we have enough evidence for how these groups interacted on an everyday level as part of a cohesive society.
If someone asks if your are a god... you say YES!
@Joakim von Anka The original comment is from Ghostbusters 😉
Ghostbusters
Does anyone know WHY they sacrificed to moloch? Like, what was the point of sacrificing the children?
Take heed do not be deceived the devil is like a roaring lion seeking whom he may devour of course these offerings are not to Yahweh just another trick of the devil sleeve God clearly says do not worship idols this is what the Canaanites brought into society
Fascinating
I'm onboard with the idea that 'MLK' was a type of sacrifice instead of the name of a deity, likely of Canaanite/Phoenician origins. The 'topheth' in Carthage were of Phoenician origins and there's still debate as to whether these were the burials of child sacrifice victims or just burials of children who died of natural causes since childhood mortality rates were high.
My questions then are:
1. What's the origins of the MLK/Molech type of sacrifice? It had to have had some liturgy and ceremony to it.
2. Since Leviticus 18:21-22 mentions the 'molech' sacrifice and relates it to passing kids through the fire, and the next verse (22) is the prohibition of a 'man laying with a man like how a man lays with a woman', could it be that male temple prostitution was practiced during the MLK sacrificial event? Seems out of place for the author in Leviticus 18 to think to mention not sacrificing children during an MLK/Molech sacrifice and then immediately prohibit men sleeping with men. From a literary standpoint, it makes more sense that the author(s) would equate homosexual sex (cultic ritual sex for fertility) with Molech ceremonies since the prohibition against male to male sex is mentioned in the very next verse.
Digital Hammurabi, doesn’t Molech mean King? Mlk/ mlCh
melech or melkart ?
Willem Pasterkamp Melkart may derive from King, I don’t know.
Molech or moloch. Lord of the gods.
Leviticus- stop worshiping molech stop eating the children.
But obviously they never stopped.
Good rule of thumb, any Semitic language word with the consonant root of mlk or ml[ch] means king or ruler. Names like melchizedek or moloch have these roots. I've always found an easy way to remember this: mlk: king. Also, MLK jr's last name was King. Just to clarify, I'm not trying to start some new conspiracy, just using a memory trick.
In the same way that words with the root slm means peace: Solomon, Suleiman, Jerusalem, Salome, etc
what does the Molech god give them for doing this crazy stuff? If this stuff is true as well and they are getting advantages of some sort granted what is the side of good and what is given to them to combat these type of things? I mean there is video evidence of this stuff happening, and also high level people interviewed getting angry about people talking about while not denying that it exist, for most people they will say it's just made up but in a interview the guy literally said " you shouldn't be violating the agreement of showing what happens in here"
look at the second definition of "holocaust", it'll get a little bit weirder
I don't really understand your comment. Are you asking why Israelites would give a molech sacrifice to Yahweh? They would do so because they would think they were following Yahweh's directives and by following his commands they would be blessed.
Imagine a world before the victory of Abraham where life meant only as much as human whim dictated
Riches n fame
@@ssddkar3577 Dark and Light mean nothing as far as entities go. There are plenty of good dark entities and bad ''light'' entities. Dark and Light =/= Evil and Good. See it more like Night vs Day. Nyx is a dark goddess but she's not evil.
It has seemed highly coincidental that the child sacrifices to Ba'al Hammon among the Phoenicians including the Carthaginians were so similar to what was attributed to "Molech/Moloch".
So in the end, it's Hamon who's the evil baby-eating god that God hates?
I imagine this was a global cult at one point united in theory divided by sect
The Carthaginians were Phoenicians or Canaanites. In the Septuagint the word “Canaanite” is translated to “Phoenician”.
Sacrificing children to Molech....
Baptizing by fire..... sacrificing their children to war...
They are connected
Sounds like a lot of speculation to me. As can be seen he never once gave any evidence that the record found in Tanakh is wrong. Even his linguistic argument is unconvincing because of his lack of knowledge of the Hebrew language as he admitted when he didn't know how to pronounce the name of king Ahaz.
Well, I’m sorry to tell you that you are making statements that could not be further from the truth.
@@DigitalHammurabi That is entirely possible, I freely admit, but that is what I got out of watching the video.
Sophie 3,000 Ms.
Sophie 3,000 ‘Ms’ indicates that Direction’s marital status is completely irrelevant and frankly none of our business.
So God tested Abraham whether he was sacrificing Issac to moloch?
watch the video
My bible just remembered these sins against them to this day in Acts 7 verse 42-43.
I have a question: what led human beings to believe that whoever they believed the creator to be, wanted babies sacrificed to him in the first place?
A corrupt priesthood
@@henripentant1120 I think it was demons and fallen elohim.
@@henripentant1120 corrupted by what? fallen elohim, IMHO
I think maybe at one time, they were trying to appease cannibalistic giants by feeding them before they could be eaten. The ritual just continued in the the memory of that practice.
One theory is that the country was suffering from TOO much rain. The priests assumed it was because of their god (moloch). In order to appease their god, they tried to sacrife many things in the brazen bull that represented it. They tried grain, but the rain kept falling. They tried animals, but the rain kept falling. They started to sacrifice their kids, and the rain stopped.
From then on out they just assumed that kids made the best sacrifice to appease the moloch.
I remember this being preached so many times, along with pictures drawn from imagination about the flaming bronze idol with fire blazing inside. I always wondered why no one had ever found such an idol, and how the pastors knew all this without it being in the Bible or anywhere else in known history. The imaginary images were used to stoke the emotions of the believers, and then a false correlation was drawn to abortion being a sacrifice to Satan. Now that I'm out of that imaginary world, I can still see how it powerfully motivates believers to shape the laws of our country.
Or maybe JUST maybe…because killing your children because they are a “clump of cells” (just like how the n@zi’s view the jews as parasite’s) is evil it just so happens that “believers” can see that evil and point it out 🤔
Maybe the fact that “believers” can recognize such evil (literally the genocide of unwanted children) and YOU can’t (or don’t want to) tells me a lot about your morality and why usually ““believers”” will usually insist atheist have no morals because that bull$hit 😒👶
I fully appreciate this take on these sacrifices, BUT: Then WHY the Bull-headed Statue image? Who/what is THAT? Those DID exist. They aren't just an imaginative creation. I have some possible answers, but I'd rather the question be explored by more than my mind. (Those that would agree with either side of the "to Molech/AS Molech" argument.)
This unmixingitup-destrangulationing of the Josiah-istic biblical denouement certainly irons it all out nicely. Makes sense now. With a little more work, though.
"I hope I've convinced you" - yep. Because as a Christian, he HAS to find a way to make it fit his narrative instead of looking at things objectively.
The interviewer spoke with a funny and ironic tone when he was talking about children sacrifice to moloch. Yo can see at the beginning of the video. Disgusting
Isn't the Canaanite god that demanded child sacrifice Yawehs brother Baal? I feel like that's the main distinction between Iraelites and Canaanites the god the worshiped. Israelites worshiped Yaweh Canaanites worshiped Baal
The Bible describes Molech as an entity. God does not want us to give our seed or perform any other lude acts. Leviticus 20:6-1.
Molek is a modification word for Melek made by scribes. And Melek is usely identified in the Bible as Yahweh.
It’s not “was” as in past tense. He just learned to hide very well and is very much alive and being sacrificed to as well as being worshipped. Just search for the numbers of missing children/people every year who stay missing (even per country for he has worshippers everywhere). The MSM never report these staggering numbers for a good reason…. You are ruled by spirit worshippers no matter where you are. You might not believe it but they sure as hell do.
Why don't you just read the Torah? Moloch is first mentioned in the writings of Moses (Leviticus 18) BEFORE the Hebrew people inhabited Canaan where the Ammonites worshipped Moloch. YHWH, through Moses, warned the people NOT TO DO as the CANAANITES DID, but 500 years after they entered the land Israel did just that - they worshipped Moloch by sacrificing their own children as live burnt offerings.
Moloch as a "God" is a mistranslation of the original Hebrew text.
The OT portion of the Bible clearly refers to Moloch as a god yet Christians call him a demon so, either they haven't read the Bible properly or do they think the Bible is wrong and they know better than the Bible's writers?
Don't hate on me "I'm just asking questions".
"Dispensational christianity" twists Peoples' Understanding of the Bible, so that the masses are greatly deceived about reality.
Molloch = Melech (king), Abi-Melek (son of king), melchi, Michael (noble prince), Eli-melech
( sun-kimg ), melchi-sedek (king-priest), Eli-ezer (shining sun) are similar to Isaac, Jesse, Isaiah (Helios, sun-son), Samson, Shamash, Elias, Samuel (the noble Sem), Samael (priest).
The one is a name for king, warrior-prince a desrtoyer (what gives him a bad name).
The other is a priest, vigilant-servant a revivor or spirit. Resuming a Twin, the 2 witnesses (earth, heavens or voice, lightning), walkures, boanerges, Gemini, dioskuroi and Demiurg (twin urges), the standing and falling angel (fallen angel is also indicating bad or evil demon) the upholder (lawyer) and the demander (prosecutor), opposer (satan), the workers of evil, the non-trust-worthy princes, the
wicked and the pious, Israel and Jacob, gog and magog, Mars and Venus, juggler and magician.
Part of the divine council (the elohim, the noble ones, a plural) ;
EL-oh Gabriel Messenger Mercury treasure-bearer Gold Belsassar Balthasar Hermes
king Michael Warrior Mars sword - bearer Myrh Mesach Gerardus Appollo
priest Samael Servant Venus light - bearer Incense Abednego Kaspar Pan
Immanuel Sadrach
In some stories a 4th person is added, somewhat of a messianic figure .
I don't know why people say God says if it's plural... There's only one God The other ones are demigods... Fallen ones.
Sacrifice to and a type of can both be true...
The vocalization Molek occurs eight times in the Masoretic Text, predominantly (five times) in Leviticus:
Leviticus 18:21 "And thou shalt not let any of thy seed pass through the fire to Molech, neither shalt thou profane the name of thy God: I am the LORD."
* I am the Yahweh
* "thy" seed (🤨)
Leviticus 20:2: "Again, thou shalt say to the children of Israel, Whosoever he be of the children of Israel, or of the strangers that sojourn in Israel, that giveth any of his seed unto Molech; he shall surely be put to death: the people of the land shall stone him with stones."
* "his" seed (🤔)
Leviticus 20:3: "And I will set my face against that man, and will cut him off from among his people; because he hath given of his seed unto Molech, to defile my sanctuary, and to profane my holy name."
* "his" seed (😕)
Leviticus 20:4: "And if the people of the land do any ways hide their eyes from the man, when he giveth of his seed unto Molech, and kill him not"
* "his" seed (😬)
Leviticus 20:5: "Then I will set my face against that man, and against his family, and will cut him off, and all that go a whoring after him, to commit whoredom with Molech, from among their people."
Two further occurrences connect the practice with Tophet, a place of sacrifice in the Valley of Hinnom (Gehenna, which later acquired the connotation of "Hell"):
2 Kings 23:10: "And he (King Josiah of Judah) defiled Topheth, which is in the valley of the children of Hinnom, that no man might make his son or his daughter to pass through the fire to Molech."
* "his" son or "his" daughter (🤢)
Jeremiah 32:35: "And they built the high places of Baal, which are in the valley of the son of Hinnom, to cause their sons and their daughters to pass through the fire unto Molech which I commanded them not, neither came it into my mind, that they should do this abomination, to cause Judah to sin."
* "their" sons/"their" daughters (🤮)
* neither came it into my mind (🥸)
The practice of "passing through fire" (`abar ba-'esh עָבַר בָּאֵשׁ) associated with the name Moloch in the citations above also occurs without reference to Moloch in Deuteronomy 18:10-13, 2 Kings 16:3 and 21:6 and Ezekiel 20:26,31 and 23:37.
Isaiah 30:33 has the vocalization melek ("king"), but this is widely accepted as an omission of the Masoretic correctors: "For Tophet is ordained of old; yea, for the king it is prepared; he hath made it deep and large: the pile thereof is fire and much wood; the breath of the LORD, like a stream of brimstone, doth kindle it."
*(LORD = YHWH = Yahweh, not God, see Yahwism)
On the other hand, while 1 Kings 11:7 has the vocalization Molek, in "Molech, the abomination of the children of Ammon", this is widely accepted as an error for Malkam (Milcom), the specifically Ammonite idol.
Wow
Christianity is based on the Jewish god requiring child sacrifice so why would anyone shy away from the idea that Yahweh is the deity?
The people of Israel were Canaanites so no surprise they worshipped as other Canaanites did.
Heard rogan mention this when talking about epsteins Island home. Yikes
3:53
Moloch is Scottish. Just Christian rewriting more evidence of Roman's writing parts of the bible these guys are hilariously wrong.
So cause he’s Scottish and not whatever makes it okay for child sacrifice?
Anyone catch the name of that author? Auto... Icecalp? That can't be right
I think it's this person: en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Otto_Eissfeldt
We gypsys say Moloh. And we dont know why we believe in him he is the Death Seeler that was it meinst in Sinte language Gypsy
😢😢
Another thing to consider is pornography its a indirect way of Baal worship. Everytime your idolizeing it and squeeze out potential children to the cannanite harlots your in a way commiting baal worship. So quit being a slave to the sin.
Ignoring the Masoretic vowel points, the name Molekh and the Hebrew word for 'king' are the same thing: M-L-K. Thus, the 'name' of this supposed Ammonite god means 'King'. The phrase L-M-L-K would then mean "to Molekh" and/or "to [the] King." I've heard that some cultures would ritualistically kill their own king after a certain period, as a sacred offering, and that one way for a king who doesn't want to die to get around this requirement is to have a substitutionary sacrifice, one that takes the place of the King. The difference between this practice and that of the sacrifice of a paschal lamb -- the blood of which was smeared onto the doorposts and lintel, to assuage the bloodthirstiness of the Angel of Death -- is, thus, only a matter of degree and not of kind. According to EXODUS, all the Egyptian homes suffered the deaths of the Firstborn children in them, while the homes of the Israelites were spared because of the substitutionary Lamb sacrifice. Assuming the Bible stories are true, the Molekh sacrifices are no worse than what the Israelites themselves were party to on a massive scale in the Exodus story.
Moses is Molech....
CheMosh... he sacrificed his
son...the Golden Calf.... the
Brazen Serpent.... The rock Massah that he struck.
"Zimri"..
@@Soohable That's your opinion, and I understand why you would call BS, but it's true.
Most people don't understand the Bible except some of the global elite, and highest order initiates of secret societies.
The Rockefellers know.
The European royal families know.
Whoever wrote William Shakespeare's plays knew..(probably Edward DeVere, 17th Earl of Oxford... mentored by John Dee)
Almost all of
Shakespeare's plays were adapted from the esoteric narrative of the Bible. It would have been obvious to people in the know.
Abraham was the father of the Canaanite tribes... read the end of Genesis 15.
Also in Genesis 15... God tells Abraham to bring 3yo heifer, goat, ram.... then a turtledove and a young pigeon.
HGR .... Hagar...
Abraham's Egyptian concubine.
Hagar is most widely interpreted as meaning "a flight" as in an immigration to a new homeland...
Turtledove
Dwd El dvr
Yng and pgn ... you look them up.
______________
In Genesis, Joseph interprets the dreams of the
Cupbearer and the Baker..
Ab cupere or
Æb-r cupere
Related to the desire of father.
(Eber/Abra/Bera)
and BKR
means first fruits or firstborn.
There's MUCH MUCH more I've learned.
Esau sold his birthright for a mess of pottage...
PD Pallas Athena
DG
Dag
Fish, or even The Great Fish.
Joseph was given to wife the daughter of the priest of On,
Asenath....
Ś Athena
At the heart of Judeo-Hellenic scripture is the Egyptian Ennead... Samael caused 1/3rd of the host of heaven to fall ... 3 6 (666)
Protestant canon of The Bible is 66 books... (6×6=36)
[The symbolic appearances of 7, 77s ,777, and 7-4 in the Bible are profuse... it's because of the moon cycle... 28 days... 14 is half, the number of days it takes to go from new moon to full...
The genealogy of Jesus... shaping up to be 3 sets of 14 ancestors between milestone historical events... for a total of the significant number 42...
But the last set only has 13.... which people thought must be a mistake, but no... they wanted it to be 41 to reinforce the 14.... ]
39 OT 27 NT.
(^Two 7s)
3×9=27....
27+27= 54 with 12 remaining...
54×12 = 648
6+4+8= 18
648+18= 666
648÷18= 36....
I think I have the whole scope by now...
I'm just filling in little pieces of detail...
I'll gladly point out more to you if you're interested...
I'll show you where the Garden of Eden was...
Or would you rather know about Sodom and Gomorrah? That's your opinion, and I understand why you would call BS, but it's true.
Most people don't understand the Bible except some of the global elite, and highest order initiates of secret societies.
The Rockefellers know.
The European royal families know.
Whoever wrote William Shakespeare's plays knew..(probably Edward DeVere, 17th Earl of Oxford... mentored by John Dee)
Almost all of
Shakespeare's plays were adapted from the esoteric narrative of the Bible. It would have been obvious to people in the know.
Abraham was the father of the Canaanite tribes... read the end of Genesis 15.
Also in Genesis 15... God tells Abraham to bring 3yo heifer, goat, ram.... then a turtledove and a young pigeon.
HGR .... Hagar...
Abraham's Egyptian concubine.
Hagar is most widely interpreted as meaning "a flight" as in an immigration to a new homeland...
Turtledove
Dwd El dvr
Yng and pgn ... you look them up.
______________
In Genesis, Joseph interprets the dreams of the
Cupbearer and the Baker..
Ab cupere or
Æb-r cupere
Related to the desire of father.
(Eber/Abra/Bera)
and BKR
means first fruits or firstborn.
There's MUCH MUCH more I've learned.
Esau sold his birthright for a mess of pottage...
PD Pallas Athena
DG
Dag
Fish, or even The Great Fish.
Joseph was given to wife the daughter of the priest of On,
Asenath....
Ś Athena
At the heart of Judeo-Hellenic scripture is the Egyptian Ennead... Samael caused 1/3rd of the host of heaven to fall ... 3 6 (666)
Protestant canon of The Bible is 66 books... (6×6=36)
[The symbolic appearances of 7, 77s ,777, and 7-4 in the Bible are profuse... it's because of the moon cycle... 28 days... 14 is half, the number of days it takes to go from new moon to full...
The genealogy of Jesus... shaping up to be 3 sets of 14 ancestors between milestone historical events... for a total of the significant number 42...
But the last set only has 13.... which people thought must be a mistake, but no... they wanted it to be 41 to reinforce the 14.... ]
39 OT 27 NT.
(^Two 7s)
3×9=27....
27+27= 54 with 12 remaining...
54×12 = 648
6+4+8= 18
648+18= 666
648÷18= 36....
I think I have the whole scope by now...
I'm just filling in little pieces of detail...
I'll gladly point out more to you if you're interested...
I'll show you where the Garden of Eden was...
Or would you rather know about Sodom and Gomorrah?
______________________________________
Here, check this out... the Tanakh is
heavily syncretic with The Myth of the Celestial Cow.
The Torah... Hathor
imgflip.com/i/7u67yj
I think that's a christianized version. The Rabbis have a better explanation.
I am replying to the substitution of the lamb story.
@@Soohable it would depend on where you are and what bible version you are looking at. I am looking at the King James Protestant bible in USA and I am seeing the Edomites , Syrians, Canaanites and hellenized Religion because it supports the WASP origins.. white anglo Saxon protestants. The origins are mixed as protestants are only 500 years old. The country has always been divided religiously.
Malak Baal sacrificed children for Anu for a reason I know 🧪
Isaiah 30:33 For Topheth has long been prepared; it has been made ready for the king. Its funeral pyre is deep and wide, with plenty of fire and wood. The breath of the LORD, (YHWH ore Yahweh), like a torrent of burning sulfur, sets it ablaze. Yahweh is so good that he himself lights the barbecue to burn children good video thanks
lol watch the human try to wiggle away from old test. primal savagery!
Molech.Baal.
nope.he is baal satans child with ishthar and orchon from orion
So I guess this whole idea of Moloch/Molech being a kind of brazen bull is just very recent and very convenient syncretic association
i have a moloch i dug up in my yard and a all seeing eye
Now they have epstein island. Did they ever stop?
I am disgusted by my Mother, Moloch.
A LOT of nodding lmao
NO, only Yeshua has the power to save, as it is written.
Using the Bible to prove the Bible.
''It's written in my book so it's true''
Child sacrifice continues today.
Sounds like simple old school abortions to me.
you can not name the creator as the name is a creation not the the name of the unnamable. Stop trying to F the ineffable. Man wants to do "God's work", if it is their work would they not be better suited for it?
Great stuff except the "Israelites" never "came into" the land of Canaan. Because theyd always been there. The archaeology prove they were Canaanites themselves this entire time.
Theres only one living God not those status!!
Moloch is either Hell's greatest warrior, or one of the seven rulers of Hell or a Pagan Diety! He is very real! He reached out to me! I couldn't have a beginner friendly demon, I was reached out to by one of the most powerful! Good times!
Moloch: "Yes Jennifer. Now open a BTC account and give me all your money and I shall give you powers to make you richd & powerful." lol im joking. Or maybe not.
Mind I ask how you got in contact?
@@JoJo-cs5gp He was contacting me first. I had to use my Occult Tarot to find out which one it was!
I agree. The abominations of the Ammonites are idols but the Moabites worship something evil.
Did the exceedingly verbose individual imagine that his much speaking csused him to appear impressively learned? Anything but. No, to the contrary, he came across as very lukewarm and ignorant.
Moloch is the reason Jews got cast out.
Read Kings 4: 4-9 Moloch worship is why your temple fell and you got cast out of Israel.
These topics do bring out the crazies in the comments.
Evasive pilpul from a Canaanite
BAAL???
Amos 5:25,26 says the Israelites sacrificed to Molech the 40 years in the wilderness not Yah·weh. It's interesting that the last plague before the exile from Egypt was child sacrifice. It could be argued that Yah·weh is Molech.
@@Soohable the Israelites started out polytheistic and gradually changed to monotheism. Molech was their chief God and eventually his name was changed to Yah·weh so this verse was written after their change to monotheism.
@@Soohable lol this is hilarious 🤣 😆 😂
@@Soohable either you believe in the anunnaki or Christianity bro. You can't have it both, well you can but it's just another invented story like all religions. You're so confused bro lol
@@Soohable and no I'm not lying about the Israelites starting out as polytheistic
@@Soohable the anunnaki story of Creation is one I accept but that's as far as I'm willing to go. Everything else you said about human history is more of a fairy tale than anything else and hasn't been proven at all. It's just a story as far as I'm concerned and even the anunnaki may very well be just a story but I like the idea of humans being genetically engineered by aliens. It's entertaining.
molech is a god, he has a brother bagul off sinster movie, i found it interesting that molech was jealous of him and stuffed baguls eyes and mouth with ash , he has a symbol well both do but they are demons , don't fool with them, meaning don't sacrifice to molech or if you find snuff films don't play them, because it is real they are not God they are gods little g
The deity "Baghuul" from Sinister was constructed by the screenwriters of the film, based on the accounts of deities like Molech. So it's still up for debate if Molech was deity that ancient people believed and worshiped.
@@rockerdax oh bagul and molech are very real, and they offer prosperity to the blind and naked, Jesus is King, i know because abortions give molech power to all the elite of the world, they feed off it and its disgusting, i wish i could show you there symbols with image they are similar but different my friend but do not conjure them through symbols or ouija board or spirit box, i summoned a king of hell asmodeus the demon a long while back and it bit me, he wanted everything from me, woe to them they play with the prince of the power of the air-Holy Bible depending version but yes the air, airwaves if you will lucifer or satan, see he works through people and technology 5-g will be his tool if you will, after i suffered to family deaths after i dealt with asmodeus as he said to call him that it was proper, i lost everything my sister my dad 3 months later the love of my life, temptations , i had no where to run i had to come to Jesus yes, and yes there is salvation, very powerful experience , while i'm at it i'll share the message" if thou shall confess with mouth Lord Jesus and believe with your HEART that he was raised from the dead, the same shall be saved you can also use ABCs of salvation A. Admit that your a sinner in need of the Savior B. Believe Jesus is Lord, in your heart. C. Call upon the Lord with your mouth, for it is Heart as your justified and made righteous in the eyes of Lord God and its with your mouth confession is made and you are saved. Seek and you will find First seek the kingdom of Heaven and Righteousness and all these things will be added unto thee, most are blind, since i got saved its lonely, i'm definately not perfect not my works , but i'm happy, i got parkinsons disease, which isn't great but i know the times almost up, we are in the last days, for those that have eyes to see think about this year 2020 covid, famines , crazy weather, forest fires earthquakes in divers place this is it, and for the last 7 years after Jesus takes the believers it will be like none other says the bible and the only way to get saved then is beheading by refusing the luciferase enzyme rna vaccine which will control you adrenocrome look that up mind control, then hell
@@johnhudnell7926 no you are living a fantasy.
@@johnhudnell7926 So i should stick to 4g then
Came here after Travis Scott concert
We're you there?
Makes perfect sense. Yahweh = Satan. Yahweh DID want these sacrifices, he just didn't want them to be given to OTHER gods.
jeremiah 7:31
🤡
What are your thoughts on some christians, and Jehovah witnesses that believe the name of the most high being Yahweh or YHWH
@@espaciolatente It's more of a divine title than a name. Just like "the President" is the title of the most high political officer but Trump and Biden can both say "I am the President," different spirits can tell us "I am the I am" (YHVH) but we have to use our discernment. Jesus is the image of the Holy Father so the Holy Father has the same personality as Jesus. An easy way to divide the spirits is what Jesus taught in John 10:10; "The thief comes only to steal, kill and destroy," so if a spirit is claiming to be YHVH but is preaching that people should steal, kill or destroy then that is not Our Father speaking.
This subject is very Spiritual.
When reading the first few chapters of Ezekiel, you will find He saw within the Spirit, a Face of an OX.
In Revelation, John saw a CALF Face, around the Throne of God.
Since the OX is older, than the Calf, I'm with the belief, this is Father and Son. Separated.
One in Heaven, One on Earth.
The Calf being young such as a child, in Heaven.
Jesus exclaimed we need to go before God such as a child.
Also, Jesus stated "Treat others how you want to be treated".
The OX, being part of Gods Spirit, came to earth, seeing calves sacrificed all over the place.
Thus reminding him, of his own calf in Heaven.
This is a comparison of God sacrificing His Son.
We as people, hear the Story of the Spirit.
However we don't realize we are hearing "Hisstory" and we repeat it, here in the flesh.
When reading Revelation, chapter 12, you will find who the Kings of Heaven were.
The Kings were the Heads of the Great RED Dragon.
In Genesis, Adam's name means RED man.
RED Dragon.
RED man.
The Spirit moved through the bloodline of Adam and was re-born with the name of Jesus.
According to Revelation, His Seven Spirits are on Fire Around the Throne.
Jesus Christ walks Through these Spirits.
And is the King OF Kings, the Lord OF Lords (lowerd's- lowerd to earth and judged by the word of God himself)
Thus they are Fires Around the Throne.
Also, the Spirit lives within Each of us.
And "The Spirit returns to the Spirit from which it came."
We have been given control OVER the Spirit in Genesis.
However, even in these days, we read in the news, of mother's puting their own babies in the oven.
This is not right.
I can assure you, the Spirit that does these things, is on Fire Around the Throne of God.
And the Spirit within these mothers RETURNS to the Spirit from which it came.
Remember: there are SEVEN Spirits OF God.
Thus far I have learned the names of 3 of the Seven Spirits:
1. The Destroyer. (God called himself by this name in Exodus, when speaking to Moses)
2. Death
3. Hell
(Death and Hell WERE given Power by God to kill man.)
Remember: Just because you are "given power" to hurt people, Does NOT mean you should use that power.......
God Commanded: Thou sall NOT kill.
The Spirit whom does WILL return to the Spirit from which it came.
God knows his own Spirit and the "Word" (Jesus- King of Kings) Separates the Soul from the Spirit.
Jesus-
The First AND the Last.
He was a diety..A cannanite diety..and the amorites
Molech is a demon.
The bible was so poorly translated.
From this Abraham probably left Canaan for this reason, and it never went away, so Israel had to deal with it when they came back.
You people have lost your mind.
Thank you so much for an insightful and thoughtful critique! Always a pleasure to hear from our fans :)
Jews ...
Poor research
Looking forward to your peer-reviewed work on the subject.
@@DigitalHammurabi dry your eyes
And leave your pride behind.
I was being truthful
Guess you don't like the truth
@@richardlilley6274 Guess you don’t back up your assertions.
@@DigitalHammurabi you shame yourself with immaturity and the inability to accept criticism which means you'll never grow up
... Bye
@@richardlilley6274 ROFL Yes, that’s definitely what we’re known for. Not accepting criticism. Of course, your criticism wasn’t terribly precise, was it? It reminded me of Andy from The Office: “That art is bad.” Good work.
Says the Jew ?
Youre idol worship.
*you're
🦉🦉🦉🦉HAIL SOROS!!! 🐂🐂🐂🐂
The 12 tribes and the sons of David and king Solomon. King Solomon is a famous demonologist who created religion creating the bible with elements from the original words of wisdom, such as the dead sea scrolls. The spell books include the key of king Solomon and the grand grimoire, which includes necromancey and child sacrifices.
This video does not include the texts which include warnings not to worship molech. Zionist/Jesuit vatican emperors of Rome/kings of Jerusalem/the ashkenatzi Germania talmud of babylonia.
Palestine was known as a land of Syria, the entite levant spoke aramaic. The people were known as pelesets.
The Roman empire was never dissolved merely re-organised. With the bloodline of the royals and the knights, starting 1096AD.
King John and the plantagenents.
So.....putin, trump, Netanyahu, Rothschild, Rockefeller, Hitler, churchill, soros, gates, Kissinger all the bloodline. Not to be confused with Jews who actually fought alongside one another in the massacre of Jerusalem (jews&muslim), of the frankish empire.
Why were the dead scrolls hidden? And other ancient texts like the book of creation? And why do people still speak aramaic in Israel, Syria and lebannon?
Do you have any ACTUAL facts to back up ANY of this, or are you another person only interested in conspiracy theories and/or believe that Dan Brown's books are actual fact/based on fact?
@@tramseyer
Facts are history. Don't you know of the grimoires he wrote, such as the key of king Solomon, the lesser key of king Solomon and the grand grimoire on necromancey.
I love facts.
@@tramseyer you do know that the 10 commandments are from the code of hammurabi and the genesis story and the flood, the epic of gilgamesh.
I don't know who Dan Brown is, but i heard he spoke of the holy grail.
Of course, that alleged mystery was solved many moons ago.
@@nataliee5501 Thanks Natalie. I'll look at some of those. I often deal with someone who follows every conspiracy theorist in the book. He gets angry when I ask him for facts, to try and pull him back to reality.
I had been looking for some DH videos I want him to see when I saw your reply. I faintly recall something of what you mentioned about Solomon, but I'll have to dig more to fully remember, if that makes sense.
@@nataliee5501 Dan Brown is the author of the DaVinci Code and related novels, by the way. Very popular from about 2000 on. The DaVinci Code was published in 2003 and took off like lightening.
This channel seems to praise and bow down to those who are 'scholars'. I put forth two words that prove this one intellect, in particular, to be wrong. The two words are 'whoring after'. Read a passage in Leviticus and another in Judges. Leviticus 20:4 "then I shall set My face against that man and against his clan, and shall cut him off - and all who go whoring after him, even go **whoring after Moleḵ** - from the midst of their people." the two words 'whoring after' is before a noun and not an adjective or verb. Read on in Judges: Judges 2:17 "However, they did not listen to their rulers either, but went **whoring after** other mighty ones, and bowed down to them. They soon turned aside from the way in which their fathers walked, in obeying the commands of יהוה - they did not do so." The operative phrase is 'whoring after ... mighty ones' which means that the act of whoring refers to a false god. In Leviticus, the whoring was after Moleḵ, a false god.
Kevin Kall Perhaps you should actually read his book before presumptuously jumping to conclusions.
I would rather believe the Bible than him
why he studied the Bible
There are still a lot of Jews today that worship Moloch