I’m 41, I grew up being told women were equals. In many things, we are equals. In the world of work, women compete with me for jobs and within this environment I treat them as competitors. I see them as I would see any other worker, at times a collaborator at times a competitor. It’s not a good idea to expend my energies to help a competitor, that’s counter to my own goals.
Not even commitment. We have to realize that marriage is just a legal status. A contract. You can be fully committed in a relationship without involving the state into it.
Corporations also promote LGBTQ awareness, not because they truly care about those groups, but because they favor employees who they deem to be less likely to reproduce. Less parental leave and fewer childcare benefits mean higher corporate profits.
Is that what happened in Rome, or in the churches where the priest touched little boys..nothing to see there. Who someone is hunching on is no one's business...move alone
sir, forget help in some simple mundane office works. Women are getting PhD degrees without any work, their supervisor and rest of the male students are doing work for her. She is marrying or living in with some co-student to get day-to-day benefits like picking up and dropping service, doing the mundane tasks, companionship, etc. and later filing domestic violence complaint on her partner when she is done. In the eyes of society, she is a strong independent and innovative woman. In reality she is just managing things and getting things done by playing the women card. This is the situation in India.
@@rahulterwade big 4 is after all some private organisation. The real knowledge gets produced and published in universities which is taken up by industries. The technical paper published in international journal represents the collective intellect of human knowledge and shall be preserved for next 2000 years at least. If people are compromising with that due to women centric agenda then humanity is doomed.
upper managements expects you to help her or you're not being a "team" player. basically, they just hired her to get the DEI tax credits, but they don't expect her to really do anything and now they can't fire her, or they'll get a lawsuit, so the easiest solution is for you to just do her job.
Hi mate. Your content is simply refreshing. I've been watching your videos for a while. You say what we're all thinking; pure and simple. Keep it up. I wish you all the best.
Still friends with an ex and I sent her an email to say hello. She replied 8 months later (which I don't care) and was saying her house is in need of repair. I said that I feel her pain and after a few other exchanges with no offer to help, crickets......
I've been in the workforce 33 years. I've met no more than 10 men who do actual work. the rest of them sit around and talk about "Well, we should do x, y, z..." and the majority charm lower level women into doing the actual work. the rest of them spend their time sabotaging, creating false crises, and self-promoting.
YES this More than 20 years working in technlogy and I can confirm this. I had for example, cases of managers taking my papers and making my male colleagues sign them with their names. Less experiences,and better paid, btw.
It not them working that is the issue, its them in leadership positions that is the problem. Thats a very important distinction that is rarely mentioned.
@@tubesismIts isnt a problem in and of itself that women have leadership positions. Its that women want equality only when it comes to benefits, not risks.
I'm so glad that i don't have to find men like you or a lot from the comments who are this bitter and misoginistic. No women asked help because we are women, woking in technlogy for 20 years because it's what's I'm good at and what i like, all i found was obstacles. Men at work make their boys clubs, you men promote each other all the time. It's blowing my mind that someone says to stop helping women for being women. when did that happen?
Many women have no idea how much men help them. They are completely clueless and think they are awesome. When confronted with the facts and a fair assessment they become angry. I’ve seen it countless times. Maybe you’re the exception. Everyone loves a competent person. 👍
Please do not confuse Europe with the US. Work culture is very different in Europe, and each European country has a different work culture. 0% of what is said here applies in France for example. Plus companies are teams, and everyone is supposed to collaborate and help others.
100% agree with what you're saying here. To correct the BS that goes on in corporate, we firstly need to have equal no. Of men (not SIMPS) & Women in HR / People & Culture ...... The root of the problem is what is being set as an expectation in the workplace which id derived from this toxic department.
@denzel1877 agree with you 10000% bro! I'd also say, even if dads start paying attention to what is being taught in schools by these teachers, we'll achieve 20% attitude change!
My question is will you help a man at work if he asks you? If you do, then does that mean the man asks for help is incompetent, you are propping him up to hurt your employer and the work ethics? If you don't help him and treat men and women equally, then you are not following your second recommendation to help men and form coalition.
Lots of us corporate gals married men who majority drank the punch too. Treated us badly if we stayed home. Compared us unfavorably with wives, moms they work with. Try and convince a husband it’s best to stay home when he sees $$$ and ‘happy’ wives, mothers at work.
I want to know where are these men helping women just because they're women. I never got help from anyone. I've always done things by myself. I get criticized frequently for that as well. Oh well...
It's an imaginary tale. Been in the workforce 34 years since I was 14. From front line fast food worker thru now senior management in public works. I, as I suspect most other women, have always lifted more than my fair share of job tasks while also balancing family. There are slackers of every gender in every level of the company including c suite. Women are just more likely to be blamed for everything, just like in everyday life, and more commonly harrassed without recourse. Clearly none of the men commenting here "help" women. And yes, many women say no to a man offering to help because we want no participation in him having the notion that he is "owed something" (not work related).
@@cls2670reading the men's comments, it's like if women were all bad workers, slow learners, leazy workers, unimaginative, limited, mean, manipulative, etc. That's strange, I have a different experience of the workplace. Women are strong assets.
We have a student loan debt crisis because our leaders in Congress quit providing sufficient funds to public universities and allowed financial institutions to exploit the situation by filling the gap with student loans. Our brains aren't fully developed until we are in our mid-twenties, and once student loans got rolling, it created a vicious cycle where colleges quit viewing them as students and instead treat them like customers. This has had the effect of dramatically increasing the cost of attending college as well. The fact that more women started going to college has nothing to do with how we have ended up in the mess we are today.
Sir, you are ignoring another factor influencing women's career pursuits. They have less tolerance for wasting their lives in long-term abusive relationships than in the past. My parents married when my mom was a senior in High School because she got pregnant. Although he provided well, my father was not a good husband, and after the last child was born, she went to nursing school, got a job, and left him. The idea that women would be better off relying on a man for financial support and staying out of the workforce is laughably archaic.
@@TshepoKotelo Career women can be abrasive, but the most angry and contentious woman I know is a fundamentalist Christian who doesn't think she should have to do any kind of work, so mileage varies with traditional women too.😅
While women are graduating college and taking gifted positions of power, men are carrying bricks building stuff and risking their lives on maintenance such as high voltage jobs or climbing the highest places. Let's equal that and then I go back to being a feminist like I used to in the 90s.
Those men are keeping society and abused by the system, mainly when working for a company paying shit (those working by themselves can get good pay), while dead weight in other departments like hr makes same or more... but you know what? They're men, they will laugh about it and go on their day because in real men fields lik construction, metalworks and similars, complaining like a little bitch does not work.
Many women are now wanting to be house wives but will keep working due to not yet having had the opportunity. Meaning they'll choose to be a house wife if they could
I also have a side hustle where my friend from college who married another friend from college who is a woman is the only child and they have a custom crop spraying in agronomy supplies company I help and I drive all the big equipment make the deliveries, repair equipment and stuff like that because she doesn't like to do that and doesn't have her pesticide license and she does all the other office work, sales and consulting and it works great as long as both have respect for the other amd be honest and appreciate But the other person is simply better at the other job then we would be I would be awful at doing billing and giving out quotes and calling back people and she can't back up a trailer or drive a semi and doesn't want to. I'm so sick of for being this adversarial relationship between men and women Yes there are women that can do the stuff I do but it's literally about one or 2%. For example we are harvesting corn out of all the truck drivers and tractor operators there's about 40 of us only one is a girl and she is a calf feeder and then does the easy job in the automatic AC tractor, that we also have a 12 year old boy doing. Lol
I've been working in corporate land in the UK for over 20 years. I'm currently working for a US company that has an office in the UK. In the particular industry that I work in I have never helped a woman just because she's a woman nor have I helped a man just because he's a man. I have never personally encountered a culture of women using their gender to seek help from men and gain unfair advantage. Nor have I ever heard of such a thing from my network of friends and colleagues. I'm not saying that there has not ever been a single case of this happening but it's certainly not systemic, and certainly not worth making a video about as if it is!
100% agree with this I don't think Rich Gilbert's got the greatest views on minorities or women...he keeps talking as if including women in the work force is not a "good or bad thing" but it's progressive as a whole for society. It should just be a good thing in general but he doesn't seem to see it that way.
I disagree with the statement from the beginning. Regardless of what narrative is pushed right now (the career is the most important thing, also for women), or what is laughed at (having kids at 22, and being a stay at home mother), it does not change what actually makes women (and men) happier. Just "going with the flow" when it is obvious that the current situation makes everyone more unhappy ultimately is NOT the way to go. Helping people (women) realize this through conversation and discussion instead of not telling them because "they will not be convinced anyway" is the last thing anyone, especially men, should do. When the facts are on your side, it is not so difficult to steer people into the right direction actually. And the backlash is really not so big if you don't just shout the facts at them (like some people do unfortunately, especially on the internet) but actually explain it like a fellow human being that wants the best for the person sitting in front of them (and themselves).
Middle way during the video I wanted to disagree, but into the second half - I am with you. „Helping women just because they are women” is the best definition of simping.
The problem with companies that disproportionately hire women is that work will NOT get done. The fact is that most female managers like to delegate the tasks they've been assigned to other people. If they hire female employees, those same female employees will try to pass that workload onto someone else. At some point, companies that excessively hire women will eventually have to hire men otherwise NOTHING will get done. They'll never admit this openly, but they all know that's what will eventually happen. Not saying all women pass off their responsibilities, I've known and worked for a handful of fantastic female bosses and coworkers, but they were the minority. The majority of women skirt responsibility whenever possible.
The housewife role is an interesting one to analyze in some detail, especially if you factor in the different historical periods, rural vs urban settings, wealth levels, and technological innovations. It's true that the "housewife" role in the middle and lower income classes is a recent, mid 20th century, thing. Labor saving machinery made the "Betty Draper" lifestyle possible even for middle, and to some degree lower, income classes in urban and to a lesser degree rural settings. For most of history, rural families engaged in farming. Through the 19th century most of the American population was engaged in farming. All members of the family, male, female and kids to some degree, worked, and a lot. But for the upper classes, throughout all history, the aspiration was for women to live in a family which could afford servants, or in modern terms have cooks, housekeepers, and nannies for employees. This is STILL the case for upper class Americans. Now, even though domestic labor burdens have been reduced by technology, the modern notion is NOT that women in the middle and lower classes should now live as the wives of the wealthy have, but that they are now under the expectation to labor in the cash earning workplace. The economic benefits of this are sometimes not as great as hoped, if you deduct the additional costs to a family of hiring child care workers, additional transportation costs, school debt, and other miscellaneous costs. The greatest blow to the financial benefits of this situation though, is the increased cost of housing. The price of housing adequate for a family is a much larger multiple relative to a typical single income than in the past. Most mortgage loans are qualified with two incomes now, even for upper middle class earners. Now there is a struggle for parents to be the ones to care for their children from birth to school age. The drive now is for government to subsidize parents who give their children to others to raise, but no help if the parents want to do that crucial work themselves. And the second working parent's income is taxed...so is the income of the child care worker. Again, not the financial benefit, or lifestyle arrangement you might wish for, but it is the one that government policy, and financial pressures in concert with societal expectations pushes families toward. What was once an option is now an obligation.
You mentioned the words, "strong" and "independent", in reference to women. There's often confusion in interpreting strength as domineering and independent as inflexibly demanding especially for those who may feel at a disadvantage simply because they are women. There's a great deal of overcompensation that I've experienced inside and outside of workplace.
How about the need for both sides to take personal responsibility, work on self-improvement, and engage with society's complexities rather than demonizing and approaching the topic of women in the workplace from a pessimistic generalist position. But there really isnt enough rage to promote that.
You can do what i dod and become a farmer and marry a Filipina lol She helps on the farm, garden and has little shop, cares for my mom part time as PCA and takes care pf a few airbnb rentals and most of the kids raising but as they get older they often go with me on the farm. And there isnt a reason why an American woman cant be a stay-at-home mom anymore My best friend from high school supports his four kids and his stay-at-home wife in a very expensive state of Massachusetts on 75 grand a year and he is a heavy equipment operator at a small company where he often brings his son to work. His wife does have a degree in nursing and she will go back working part-time when the kids get old enough They sacrificed quite a bit of lifestyle but it was actually not that hard he said very doable They own a house two vehicles going vacation for 3 weeks a year etc. he does have to live in a poorer part of the state and drive 30 minutes to work in a more affluent area where the homes cost 6x as much.
Being barefoot and pregnant in your own kitchen is like the best thing you can possible hope for. You're in YOUR house, in relative comfort, creating a family. Whenever anyone recites this tired trope, they are telling you they are deeply unhappy and resentful.
Not when you have a husband that will become domineering that will abuse their financial power over you….and the majority of males do this. There’s a reason women fought to work outside the home, males had power and they abused it. Plain and simple.
It’s not really possible to revert to earlier modes of social arrangements. And that would be largely owing to society no longer supporting so called traditionalist arrangements. But borrowing money to finance unmarketable degrees is not the way forward for either gender. And I’m old fashioned because I think that there are only two genders.
Only passant women don’t have a choice but to work. The queens and wives of rich men certainly have a choice. Here is the argument to challenge women’s values encoded by the corporations that want cheap labor. There is a town with 100 families and 100 jobs, there is no possibility of more job due to geography of the town location. Which is more stable culture for the town, 100 men taking the 100 jobs or if it is 50/50 where some men have no women and can cause violence?
I'M TIRED OF SPENDING A QUARTER OF MY TIME TO HELP THEM DOING THEIR WORK I'M TIRED OF THE STUPID GOSSIPS I'M TIRED OF THE SOME THAT SLEEP AROUND THE COMPANY Culturally, we have a shitty culture and too much humans got a shitty character that create more chaos. It was already hard with only men, now it's twice as hard AND tiresome.
Biology dictates that men and women (working together) will have an affinity for each other, and it will sooner or later have a negative effect on relationships outside of work.
Money and freedom is what you have when you are single. There's no reason to be mad at women just because they're being true to their nature. I just prefer to not "sponsor" one. I've got my own life. How weak would I have to be to need someone to overturn the applecart whenever she's feeling less than wonderful?
I don't know any men that are angry at women. Smart men can exploit working woman with less effort than they did with "traditional housewives." There at a lot of "traditional" women out there. They are quite happy and they have happy families.
Merit based hiring needs to return and men in the workplace need to grow their balls back and stop tolerating nonsense diversity meetings and poor performers regardless of gender. Standards need raising: many companies are operating poorly because of this DEI hiring. If I brought a company the first area of focus would be the HR department and the cost centers.
"Go with the flow" means you have no standards. The last 50 years of male weakness pushing female independence has resulted in problem-low birth rates, mass female depression therapy/drug use, and mass female mid-life childlessness/loneliness. The past century of feminism is but one of many that has happened throughout history until society returns to normal. Male dominance with female support is the natural order of life that has enabled us to survive for thousands of years. Other ways are novel for a while but do not work in the long run. There is a reason history books are filled with the names of men.
I thought the reason why women always supported men, was because women got pregnant putting them in extremely vulnerable positions allowing men to take advantage of them. not to mention the large chunk of men who were unsuccessful and didn't reproduce leaving only the best men behind.
You said it your self at the beginning... Women don't want to and are not gonna have kids. End of the line... there is no next generation to worry about. Let the ones that don't consider that normal nor positive deal with it... by having kids and getting the women just helping the man period... No need for all this blah blah blah
The reason you're stressing that there is "NO CHOICE" for women to work is because you're looking at a pixel and not a picture. Have a broader view of society. If men amd women were able to hold stable marriages and families, ofc women would not need to work... But how do you have strong stable families? Eliminate sexual promiscuity from and "self worship" from society. And that requires some regulations and discipline from the individual.
Huh, not really what I thought it would be but okay. I would rather hear about domestic and biological stuff like theory of that screaming attracts males to fix a problem. Thats tropic for another time I guess, I had to be more specific.
I am a woman and I applaud you for this topic that no none ever wants to talk about. I'm in my 50s and I was always baffled as to why women would want to do the things that men NATURALLY do which is lead. Ironically, I am in Management but that's do to that fact that the work culture frowns upon you when you're not in this leading roles or climbing your way up the ladder and frankly its exhausting! So i do appreciate the content and passing the knowledge to the younger generation who has no idea what has transpired in these last 40 to 50 years. Awesome content
Can I correct you on something sir! as a man I am not angry women are working and making money and debts, I am actually happy I do not have to work like our forefathers used to. Women are actually the biggest consumers in this world and I am glad that they are earning it while spending it. If you think feminism has elevated women and enslaved men, then I think you got it all wrong coz I see the opposite. All we have to do is keep supporting the rhetoric that "women are strong & independent" so they can work even harder while we are busy with video games and getting allowances and free sex in the evenings. Men have built EVERYTHING and there's nothing to build right now, so men are taking the back seat while women are being "empowered" to work/slave/maintain. If you believe making women create debts and work hard is empowerment then big corporate did not fool only women, they fooled a lot of men too. Men don't have to work like they used to, pu$$y has plummeted in value and we chow it for free, etc... Personally I am happy with the results of feminism and the current state of affairs.
I think the key thing that is important is to make sure women makes an informed choice that is not based on a false narrative. The main thing for women to be aware of is that their biology makes it so that it's a clear choice between career or children. This is because most people build a career between 20-40, but this is also the fertile time for women. On the other hand, it's quite possible to have a job that is not a major career or even a part time job and still have children. The main fake narrative is that many women thinks that having a career makes them more attractive to men meaning that they can have a career and then in their 30s or 40s so will that land them the man of their dreams.
Women get a lot of preferences in traditional male fields. They get awarded promotions and status just because of their gender. And women form women only support networks and groups for the advancement of women. Men are not allowed to form a group for the advancement of men exclusively.
Women at work rely on men taking the heavy side for them. Most of them are completely ineffective. The result is that a man working next to a woman forgets the taste of sleep. Their email will return after 16:30 "out of office" and you will work until midnight. Night after night. Forget about it. When I work with a team with women I mark off the women's contribution from the outstart. I make sure there are enough men to get it done. Rarely one of the women will be competent, and motivated, but not generally.
The Taliban made it possible for women not to go back. Hence, is possible to do it. And as to female "friends" -- sorry this is not a sustainable friendship. Unless "friend" is merely an acquaintance. Will it happen or not in the West? Don't know. But neither do you.
It's a hard pill to swallow, I know. But it's good for you . Accept it. Your "superior Western values" are what got you in this mess. More of that won't help.
"Not putting the genie back in the bottle", that's been said for a lot of things yet it turned out to be possible. Otherwise women worked throughout all of history but not to outcompete men. This will continue until women become disillusioned with full time work and men stop giving consent to their own disenfranchisement as heads of families.
I’m 41, I grew up being told women were equals. In many things, we are equals. In the world of work, women compete with me for jobs and within this environment I treat them as competitors. I see them as I would see any other worker, at times a collaborator at times a competitor. It’s not a good idea to expend my energies to help a competitor, that’s counter to my own goals.
Yeah
i stopped helping women a long time ago, when they were being hired BECAUSE of their gender and
then the boss expected me to do my job and hers!!!!
😂
I don't think men are angry at women. I think men are losing interest in marriage/commitment. Costs outweigh the benefits.
exactly this. juice isnt worth the squeeze. the goal is now to work hard and retire early in a country where gender relations are much better
Good women are tired of raising grown boys..That sounds good.
Not even commitment. We have to realize that marriage is just a legal status. A contract. You can be fully committed in a relationship without involving the state into it.
@@carmeld45 Good women makes me a sandwich 🥪
As a Gen Z, I don't know I've ever been interested in marriage. If you ever get red pulled you find out
Corporations also promote LGBTQ awareness, not because they truly care about those groups, but because they favor employees who they deem to be less likely to reproduce. Less parental leave and fewer childcare benefits mean higher corporate profits.
Is that what happened in Rome, or in the churches where the priest touched little boys..nothing to see there. Who someone is hunching on is no one's business...move alone
I know women that "Dump" their work on other people and then they get a promotion for "getting the work done."
Oh yeah!!! 💯
That's not gender specific. Our department has a whole class of aristocratic employees like this.
@@stevecarter8810 yes, we should be very careful not to do other's people work.
Man you’re becoming one of my favourite RUclipsrs!
Thanks! You literally made my day!
At work today, I told a woman who needed help to go into the woods and find a BEAR. Cause at least they can do the BEAR minimum.
😂
sir, forget help in some simple mundane office works. Women are getting PhD degrees without any work, their supervisor and rest of the male students are doing work for her. She is marrying or living in with some co-student to get day-to-day benefits like picking up and dropping service, doing the mundane tasks, companionship, etc. and later filing domestic violence complaint on her partner when she is done. In the eyes of society, she is a strong independent and innovative woman. In reality she is just managing things and getting things done by playing the women card. This is the situation in India.
Bhai mere 😢. These people have ruined and Rotten the big4 to core. We are CA, still they do this.
@@rahulterwade big 4 is after all some private organisation. The real knowledge gets produced and published in universities which is taken up by industries.
The technical paper published in international journal represents the collective intellect of human knowledge and shall be preserved for next 2000 years at least. If people are compromising with that due to women centric agenda then humanity is doomed.
@@saikatghosh90 Are there any financial firms where politics isn't present in india? I am doing Ca articleship in big4 EY, and I hate it.
upper managements expects you to help her or you're not being a "team" player.
basically, they just hired her to get the DEI tax credits, but they don't expect her to really do anything and now they can't fire her, or they'll get a lawsuit, so the easiest solution is for you to just do her job.
As long as company's are sucking up to the " DEI tax breaks" i don't see this problem ever going away.
Hi mate. Your content is simply refreshing. I've been watching your videos for a while. You say what we're all thinking; pure and simple. Keep it up. I wish you all the best.
Still friends with an ex and I sent her an email to say hello. She replied 8 months later (which I don't care) and was saying her house is in need of repair. I said that I feel her pain and after a few other exchanges with no offer to help, crickets......
I've been in the workforce 33 years. I've met no more than 10 men who do actual work. the rest of them sit around and talk about "Well, we should do x, y, z..." and the majority charm lower level women into doing the actual work. the rest of them spend their time sabotaging, creating false crises, and self-promoting.
YES
this
More than 20 years working in technlogy and I can confirm this.
I had for example, cases of managers taking my papers and making my male colleagues sign them with their names. Less experiences,and better paid, btw.
I’m a woman and I’d prefer to be at home but we need the money. I can’t believe women fought for this shit….Screw the corporate bullshit!
It not them working that is the issue, its them in leadership positions that is the problem. Thats a very important distinction that is rarely mentioned.
Why is it a problem?
I think working together has its own set of issues too
@@tubesismIts isnt a problem in and of itself that women have leadership positions. Its that women want equality only when it comes to benefits, not risks.
I'm so glad that i don't have to find men like you or a lot from the comments who are this bitter and misoginistic.
No women asked help because we are women, woking in technlogy for 20 years because it's what's I'm good at and what i like, all i found was obstacles. Men at work make their boys clubs, you men promote each other all the time. It's blowing my mind that someone says to stop helping women for being women. when did that happen?
Many women have no idea how much men help them. They are completely clueless and think they are awesome. When confronted with the facts and a fair assessment they become angry. I’ve seen it countless times.
Maybe you’re the exception. Everyone loves a competent person. 👍
Please do not confuse Europe with the US. Work culture is very different in Europe, and each European country has a different work culture.
0% of what is said here applies in France for example.
Plus companies are teams, and everyone is supposed to collaborate and help others.
100% agree with what you're saying here. To correct the BS that goes on in corporate, we firstly need to have equal no. Of men (not SIMPS) & Women in HR / People & Culture ...... The root of the problem is what is being set as an expectation in the workplace which id derived from this toxic department.
It started at school, they are too many female teachers to male.
@denzel1877 agree with you 10000% bro! I'd also say, even if dads start paying attention to what is being taught in schools by these teachers, we'll achieve 20% attitude change!
Men are simps?
My question is will you help a man at work if he asks you? If you do, then does that mean the man asks for help is incompetent, you are propping him up to hurt your employer and the work ethics? If you don't help him and treat men and women equally, then you are not following your second recommendation to help men and form coalition.
Lots of us corporate gals married men who majority drank the punch too. Treated us badly if we stayed home. Compared us unfavorably with wives, moms they work with. Try and convince a husband it’s best to stay home when he sees $$$ and ‘happy’ wives, mothers at work.
I want to know where are these men helping women just because they're women. I never got help from anyone. I've always done things by myself. I get criticized frequently for that as well. Oh well...
It's an imaginary tale. Been in the workforce 34 years since I was 14. From front line fast food worker thru now senior management in public works. I, as I suspect most other women, have always lifted more than my fair share of job tasks while also balancing family. There are slackers of every gender in every level of the company including c suite. Women are just more likely to be blamed for everything, just like in everyday life, and more commonly harrassed without recourse. Clearly none of the men commenting here "help" women. And yes, many women say no to a man offering to help because we want no participation in him having the notion that he is "owed something" (not work related).
@@cls2670reading the men's comments, it's like if women were all
bad workers, slow learners, leazy workers, unimaginative, limited, mean, manipulative, etc. That's strange, I have a different experience of the workplace. Women are strong assets.
I think no man is going to risk giving you an honest answer to your question, it wouldn't be safe.
We have a student loan debt crisis because our leaders in Congress quit providing sufficient funds to public universities and allowed financial institutions to exploit the situation by filling the gap with student loans. Our brains aren't fully developed until we are in our mid-twenties, and once student loans got rolling, it created a vicious cycle where colleges quit viewing them as students and instead treat them like customers. This has had the effect of dramatically increasing the cost of attending college as well. The fact that more women started going to college has nothing to do with how we have ended up in the mess we are today.
Won't work, will always be some simp, "picking up the slack"
Sir, you are ignoring another factor influencing women's career pursuits. They have less tolerance for wasting their lives in long-term abusive relationships than in the past. My parents married when my mom was a senior in High School because she got pregnant. Although he provided well, my father was not a good husband, and after the last child was born, she went to nursing school, got a job, and left him. The idea that women would be better off relying on a man for financial support and staying out of the workforce is laughably archaic.
I've never seen a man cry during or after a performance review. I have seen many women cry at the slightest critique of their work.
I known a women jumped from 5th floor for low rating
I don't have a problem with women getting educated and getting jobs, I just don't want to have anything to do with such women.
why?
@@MarioMario-vy4bi The bible says it's better for a man to dwell in a house alone than dwell in a house with an angry and contentious woman
@@TshepoKotelo Career women can be abrasive, but the most angry and contentious woman I know is a fundamentalist Christian who doesn't think she should have to do any kind of work, so mileage varies with traditional women too.😅
@@candybracelets As long as she does housework I can deal with that
Sounds reasonable to me. We all need to do the work... all kinds of work that society needs. Hopefully it'll get sorted out sooner rather than later.
While women are graduating college and taking gifted positions of power, men are carrying bricks building stuff and risking their lives on maintenance such as high voltage jobs or climbing the highest places. Let's equal that and then I go back to being a feminist like I used to in the 90s.
Those men are keeping society and abused by the system, mainly when working for a company paying shit (those working by themselves can get good pay), while dead weight in other departments like hr makes same or more... but you know what? They're men, they will laugh about it and go on their day because in real men fields lik construction, metalworks and similars, complaining like a little bitch does not work.
Many women are now wanting to be house wives but will keep working due to not yet having had the opportunity. Meaning they'll choose to be a house wife if they could
True they are not going back, they are going away.
away for bitter sexist men, yes.
I think you provide an excellent perspective and advice.
I also have a side hustle where my friend from college who married another friend from college who is a woman is the only child and they have a custom crop spraying in agronomy supplies company I help and I drive all the big equipment make the deliveries, repair equipment and stuff like that because she doesn't like to do that and doesn't have her pesticide license and she does all the other office work, sales and consulting and it works great as long as both have respect for the other amd be honest and appreciate But the other person is simply better at the other job then we would be I would be awful at doing billing and giving out quotes and calling back people and she can't back up a trailer or drive a semi and doesn't want to. I'm so sick of for being this adversarial relationship between men and women Yes there are women that can do the stuff I do but it's literally about one or 2%. For example we are harvesting corn out of all the truck drivers and tractor operators there's about 40 of us only one is a girl and she is a calf feeder and then does the easy job in the automatic AC tractor, that we also have a 12 year old boy doing. Lol
I've been working in corporate land in the UK for over 20 years. I'm currently working for a US company that has an office in the UK.
In the particular industry that I work in I have never helped a woman just because she's a woman nor have I helped a man just because he's a man.
I have never personally encountered a culture of women using their gender to seek help from men and gain unfair advantage.
Nor have I ever heard of such a thing from my network of friends and colleagues. I'm not saying that there has not ever been a single case of this happening but it's certainly not systemic, and certainly not worth making a video about as if it is!
100% agree with this I don't think Rich Gilbert's got the greatest views on minorities or women...he keeps talking as if including women in the work force is not a "good or bad thing" but it's progressive as a whole for society. It should just be a good thing in general but he doesn't seem to see it that way.
New subscriber. Love the content!
We need more of your wisdom ❤
I disagree with the statement from the beginning. Regardless of what narrative is pushed right now (the career is the most important thing, also for women), or what is laughed at (having kids at 22, and being a stay at home mother), it does not change what actually makes women (and men) happier.
Just "going with the flow" when it is obvious that the current situation makes everyone more unhappy ultimately is NOT the way to go. Helping people (women) realize this through conversation and discussion instead of not telling them because "they will not be convinced anyway" is the last thing anyone, especially men, should do. When the facts are on your side, it is not so difficult to steer people into the right direction actually. And the backlash is really not so big if you don't just shout the facts at them (like some people do unfortunately, especially on the internet) but actually explain it like a fellow human being that wants the best for the person sitting in front of them (and themselves).
Middle way during the video I wanted to disagree, but into the second half - I am with you. „Helping women just because they are women” is the best definition of simping.
The problem with companies that disproportionately hire women is that work will NOT get done. The fact is that most female managers like to delegate the tasks they've been assigned to other people. If they hire female employees, those same female employees will try to pass that workload onto someone else. At some point, companies that excessively hire women will eventually have to hire men otherwise NOTHING will get done. They'll never admit this openly, but they all know that's what will eventually happen. Not saying all women pass off their responsibilities, I've known and worked for a handful of fantastic female bosses and coworkers, but they were the minority. The majority of women skirt responsibility whenever possible.
Women rarely hold themselves accountable for anything. They point to men or the government to be accountable.
The housewife role is an interesting one to analyze in some detail, especially if you factor in the different historical periods, rural vs urban settings, wealth levels, and technological innovations.
It's true that the "housewife" role in the middle and lower income classes is a recent, mid 20th century, thing. Labor saving machinery made the "Betty Draper" lifestyle possible even for middle, and to some degree lower, income classes in urban and to a lesser degree rural settings.
For most of history, rural families engaged in farming. Through the 19th century most of the American population was engaged in farming. All members of the family, male, female and kids to some degree, worked, and a lot.
But for the upper classes, throughout all history, the aspiration was for women to live in a family which could afford servants, or in modern terms have cooks, housekeepers, and nannies for employees. This is STILL the case for upper class Americans.
Now, even though domestic labor burdens have been reduced by technology, the modern notion is NOT that women in the middle and lower classes should now live as the wives of the wealthy have, but that they are now under the expectation to labor in the cash earning workplace.
The economic benefits of this are sometimes not as great as hoped, if you deduct the additional costs to a family of hiring child care workers, additional transportation costs, school debt, and other miscellaneous costs.
The greatest blow to the financial benefits of this situation though, is the increased cost of housing.
The price of housing adequate for a family is a much larger multiple relative to a typical single income than in the past.
Most mortgage loans are qualified with two incomes now, even for upper middle class earners.
Now there is a struggle for parents to be the ones to care for their children from birth to school age.
The drive now is for government to subsidize parents who give their children to others to raise, but no help if the parents want to do that crucial work themselves.
And the second working parent's income is taxed...so is the income of the child care worker. Again, not the financial benefit, or lifestyle arrangement you might wish for, but it is the one that government policy, and financial pressures in concert with societal expectations pushes families toward.
What was once an option is now an obligation.
You mentioned the words, "strong" and "independent", in reference to women. There's often confusion in interpreting strength as domineering and independent as inflexibly demanding especially for those who may feel at a disadvantage simply because they are women. There's a great deal of overcompensation that I've experienced inside and outside of workplace.
Are you going to discuss incompetent men?
Happy to discuss anything that’s relevant and interesting
How about the need for both sides to take personal responsibility, work on self-improvement, and engage with society's complexities rather than demonizing and approaching the topic of women in the workplace from a pessimistic generalist position. But there really isnt enough rage to promote that.
Nah, he will never do that, just blame women for everything.
You can do what i dod and become a farmer and marry a Filipina lol She helps on the farm, garden and has little shop, cares for my mom part time as PCA and takes care pf a few airbnb rentals and most of the kids raising but as they get older they often go with me on the farm.
And there isnt a reason why an American woman cant be a stay-at-home mom anymore My best friend from high school supports his four kids and his stay-at-home wife in a very expensive state of Massachusetts on 75 grand a year and he is a heavy equipment operator at a small company where he often brings his son to work. His wife does have a degree in nursing and she will go back working part-time when the kids get old enough They sacrificed quite a bit of lifestyle but it was actually not that hard he said very doable They own a house two vehicles going vacation for 3 weeks a year etc. he does have to live in a poorer part of the state and drive 30 minutes to work in a more affluent area where the homes cost 6x as much.
Insightful 👍
Being barefoot and pregnant in your own kitchen is like the best thing you can possible hope for. You're in YOUR house, in relative comfort, creating a family. Whenever anyone recites this tired trope, they are telling you they are deeply unhappy and resentful.
i can make you pregnant
Not when you have a husband that will become domineering that will abuse their financial power over you….and the majority of males do this. There’s a reason women fought to work outside the home, males had power and they abused it. Plain and simple.
It’s not really possible to revert to earlier modes of social arrangements. And that would be largely owing to society no longer supporting so called traditionalist arrangements. But borrowing money to finance unmarketable degrees is not the way forward for either gender. And I’m old fashioned because I think that there are only two genders.
We need to make companies democratic, where workers own the company or eventually own the company.
Only passant women don’t have a choice but to work. The queens and wives of rich men certainly have a choice.
Here is the argument to challenge women’s values encoded by the corporations that want cheap labor. There is a town with 100 families and 100 jobs, there is no possibility of more job due to geography of the town location. Which is more stable culture for the town, 100 men taking the 100 jobs or if it is 50/50 where some men have no women and can cause violence?
I'M TIRED OF SPENDING A QUARTER OF MY TIME TO HELP THEM DOING THEIR WORK
I'M TIRED OF THE STUPID GOSSIPS
I'M TIRED OF THE SOME THAT SLEEP AROUND THE COMPANY
Culturally, we have a shitty culture and too much humans got a shitty character that create more chaos. It was already hard with only men, now it's twice as hard AND tiresome.
Biology dictates that men and women (working together) will have an affinity for each other, and it will sooner or later have a negative effect on relationships outside of work.
No, Male Biology dictates that. Males have the issue not wormen
@@carmeld45 my wife likes me a lot.
@@papaix4387 She like me a lot too
@@isambo400 I like you alot
Money and freedom is what you have when you are single. There's no reason to be mad at women just because they're being true to their nature. I just prefer to not "sponsor" one. I've got my own life. How weak would I have to be to need someone to overturn the applecart whenever she's feeling less than wonderful?
Great incite. Great advice.
I don't know any men that are angry at women. Smart men can exploit working woman with less effort than they did with "traditional housewives." There at a lot of "traditional" women out there. They are quite happy and they have happy families.
Merit based hiring needs to return and men in the workplace need to grow their balls back and stop tolerating nonsense diversity meetings and poor performers regardless of gender. Standards need raising: many companies are operating poorly because of this DEI hiring. If I brought a company the first area of focus would be the HR department and the cost centers.
But they shouldn't be in the workplace...
It takes work to raise children so I disagree.
@isambo400 Yes they should be at hold raising the children
"Go with the flow" means you have no standards. The last 50 years of male weakness pushing female independence has resulted in problem-low birth rates, mass female depression therapy/drug use, and mass female mid-life childlessness/loneliness. The past century of feminism is but one of many that has happened throughout history until society returns to normal. Male dominance with female support is the natural order of life that has enabled us to survive for thousands of years. Other ways are novel for a while but do not work in the long run. There is a reason history books are filled with the names of men.
No. male nature is a HUGE reason why women are opting out.
I thought the reason why women always supported men, was because women got pregnant putting them in extremely vulnerable positions allowing men to take advantage of them. not to mention the large chunk of men who were unsuccessful and didn't reproduce leaving only the best men behind.
You said it your self at the beginning...
Women don't want to and are not gonna have kids.
End of the line... there is no next generation to worry about.
Let the ones that don't consider that normal nor positive deal with it... by having kids and getting the women just helping the man period...
No need for all this blah blah blah
Women manipulate into promotions instead of earning them, clique up and make sabotaging and smear campaigning there main goals.
The reason you're stressing that there is "NO CHOICE" for women to work is because you're looking at a pixel and not a picture.
Have a broader view of society.
If men amd women were able to hold stable marriages and families, ofc women would not need to work...
But how do you have strong stable families?
Eliminate sexual promiscuity from and "self worship" from society. And that requires some regulations and discipline from the individual.
but what if women would rather work and not have stable families?
They didn't ask for this, they didn't fight for it? Are you blind dude? Seriously?
Huh, not really what I thought it would be but okay. I would rather hear about domestic and biological stuff like theory of that screaming attracts males to fix a problem. Thats tropic for another time I guess, I had to be more specific.
I see. I’m not much of an expert in those kinds of things - more on the effects on society and culture
I am a woman and I applaud you for this topic that no none ever wants to talk about. I'm in my 50s and I was always baffled as to why women would want to do the things that men NATURALLY do which is lead. Ironically, I am in Management but that's do to that fact that the work culture frowns upon you when you're not in this leading roles or climbing your way up the ladder and frankly its exhausting! So i do appreciate the content and passing the knowledge to the younger generation who has no idea what has transpired in these last 40 to 50 years. Awesome content
I don't apply for jobs higher up on my company because I don't want to work with a building full of women. Life is too short. I'll stay a grunt.
Can I correct you on something sir! as a man I am not angry women are working and making money and debts, I am actually happy I do not have to work like our forefathers used to. Women are actually the biggest consumers in this world and I am glad that they are earning it while spending it.
If you think feminism has elevated women and enslaved men, then I think you got it all wrong coz I see the opposite. All we have to do is keep supporting the rhetoric that "women are strong & independent" so they can work even harder while we are busy with video games and getting allowances and free sex in the evenings.
Men have built EVERYTHING and there's nothing to build right now, so men are taking the back seat while women are being "empowered" to work/slave/maintain. If you believe making women create debts and work hard is empowerment then big corporate did not fool only women, they fooled a lot of men too.
Men don't have to work like they used to, pu$$y has plummeted in value and we chow it for free, etc... Personally I am happy with the results of feminism and the current state of affairs.
I think the key thing that is important is to make sure women makes an informed choice that is not based on a false narrative.
The main thing for women to be aware of is that their biology makes it so that it's a clear choice between career or children.
This is because most people build a career between 20-40, but this is also the fertile time for women.
On the other hand, it's quite possible to have a job that is not a major career or even a part time job and still have children.
The main fake narrative is that many women thinks that having a career makes them more attractive to men meaning that they can have a career and then in their 30s or 40s so will that land them the man of their dreams.
Oy vey! look how far below your eyes your ears are.
You are of the friendly kind.
You gave a well balanced view. Thank you
Women get a lot of preferences in traditional male fields. They get awarded promotions and status just because of their gender. And women form women only support networks and groups for the advancement of women. Men are not allowed to form a group for the advancement of men exclusively.
Women at work rely on men taking the heavy side for them. Most of them are completely ineffective. The result is that a man working next to a woman forgets the taste of sleep. Their email will return after 16:30 "out of office" and you will work until midnight. Night after night. Forget about it. When I work with a team with women I mark off the women's contribution from the outstart. I make sure there are enough men to get it done. Rarely one of the women will be competent, and motivated, but not generally.
So wrong...
The Taliban made it possible for women not to go back. Hence, is possible to do it. And as to female "friends" -- sorry this is not a sustainable friendship. Unless "friend" is merely an acquaintance. Will it happen or not in the West? Don't know. But neither do you.
Same when he says the dollar will never crash... Who knows but it doesn't look great.
Islam is the solution mate.... 😉
Stop deleting comments
Muslim guidance on gender interactions avoids all problems you describe.
It's a hard pill to swallow, I know. But it's good for you .
Accept it. Your "superior Western values" are what got you in this mess. More of that won't help.
Yes let's fix one problem but bring in 1000 worse ones lol
"Not putting the genie back in the bottle", that's been said for a lot of things yet it turned out to be possible. Otherwise women worked throughout all of history but not to outcompete men. This will continue until women become disillusioned with full time work and men stop giving consent to their own disenfranchisement as heads of families.