The law clearly states "for the use of pursuit and harvesting game" so there is clarity there for the people trying their best to throw shade at the DNR or relate it to something else to make a point
Its sad that some folks feel they need that much of an electronic advantage over a wild animal... The hunting world has became so yuppied up and watered down with electronics and batteries to the point its no wounder some folks look at hunting in a negative way... How much of an advantage do we really need over these animals ?
I'm on the wild games side of this one... How much of an electronic advantage do we need over these animals ? It's getting pretty sad in my opinion with the real time cell phone pics... I feel it's totally unfair when we already have a huge natural advantage already...
Geez oh my now what! Say it ain't so Lucy! How are you gonna scout? Guess you will have to actually scout instead of sitting in the couch waiting for signal. Yeeesh
clear as mud. By definition I'm using my camera's to help me harvest a deer. They need to define that better, something like if you get a picture on your cell you can't shoot that animal that day? how are they going to police this?
So, if I have a set, stand and mock scrape etc, and I have a camera watching the mock scrape...all if this in very close proximity, it shouldn't be a violation....if I am understanding this correctly
From my understanding of what I was told of the rule . If you use Deer urine and can shoot the scrape from your stand it would not be illegal. Remember You can’t put mineral in Iowa that would influence the travel the deer to hunt over. I would talk with the DNR officer in your area and ask their interpretation of the rule. That way you know for sure, in case they would ever check your area.
With modern treestands and saddles no reason to leave stand up. Wish they would do this in ohio. Everywhere you look on public there is a camera or treestand
there is way to much crying by the state about how you harvest the deer you paid for by buying a tag cause the state owns the wild life in said state. now that being said if a deer jumps out in front of your car and you can't avoid it hitting the side of your car who pays for the repair well you do now that being said if the kid next door throws a ball and bust's the windshield his parents pays for the damage so if the state owns the wildlife in said state then the state needs to pay for damage done to your car caused by the moveable property of the state now prove me wrong 😉
@@kennethharding9118 The deer have no moral compass and intelligence to comprehend their actions, that kid that thru the ball likely has parents who are allowing Tictok to raise them and it is the parents responsibility for their off springs' actions
that what they want the state owns the wildlife so if they own then they should pay for damage to your car when a deer runs into the side of your car. it was damaged by state owned property pay up
@@kennethharding9118 Might want to rethink that ideology, who funds the state? Taxpayers, or better than that they would likely raise licenses to pay for this mindset hope you are for paying 3to 4 times higher price for tags
They will rely on tips from other hunters just as how most of their investigations are started currently, they are not hiding in the bushes enforcing laws, they are waiting on phone calls and following up on tips
Are the DNR still using cameras??? No video should be allowed in court if you can’t do what the DNR or government do!
The law clearly states "for the use of pursuit and harvesting game" so there is clarity there for the people trying their best to throw shade at the DNR or relate it to something else to make a point
Its sad that some folks feel they need that much of an electronic advantage over a wild animal...
The hunting world has became so yuppied up and watered down with electronics and batteries to the point its no wounder some folks look at hunting in a negative way...
How much of an advantage do we really need over these animals ?
DNR are going to be giving out a lot of tickets this year and years to come. This is a way for them to make more money.
I'm on the wild games side of this one...
How much of an electronic advantage do we need over these animals ?
It's getting pretty sad in my opinion with the real time cell phone pics... I feel it's totally unfair when we already have a huge natural advantage already...
I use cell cams and bait @@BBD-350L
Geez oh my now what! Say it ain't so Lucy! How are you gonna scout? Guess you will have to actually scout instead of sitting in the couch waiting for signal. Yeeesh
clear as mud. By definition I'm using my camera's to help me harvest a deer. They need to define that better, something like if you get a picture on your cell you can't shoot that animal that day? how are they going to police this?
So you cant call Bobby Ray on the walkie talkie and tell him the big buck is coming down the tree line but you cant text Bobby Ray and tell him🙄🙄
So, if I have a set, stand and mock scrape etc, and I have a camera watching the mock scrape...all if this in very close proximity, it shouldn't be a violation....if I am understanding this correctly
From my understanding of what I was told of the rule . If you use Deer urine and can shoot the scrape from your stand it would not be illegal. Remember You can’t put mineral in Iowa that would influence the travel the deer to hunt over. I would talk with the DNR officer in your area and ask their interpretation of the rule. That way you know for sure, in case they would ever check your area.
As long as the camera is removed within 24 hrs on public land , if not it is deemed as abandoned and maybe removed by anyone
With modern treestands and saddles no reason to leave stand up. Wish they would do this in ohio. Everywhere you look on public there is a camera or treestand
there is way to much crying by the state about how you harvest the deer you paid for by buying a tag cause the state owns the wild life in said state. now that being said if a deer jumps out in front of your car and you can't avoid it hitting the side of your car who pays for the repair well you do now that being said if the kid next door throws a ball and bust's the windshield his parents pays for the damage so if the state owns the wildlife in said state then the state needs to pay for damage done to your car caused by the moveable property of the state now prove me wrong 😉
@@kennethharding9118 The deer have no moral compass and intelligence to comprehend their actions, that kid that thru the ball likely has parents who are allowing Tictok to raise them and it is the parents responsibility for their off springs' actions
Why would a person leave their boots on state land overnight?
Ive never heard of this
I was kidding
Just make them illegal during the season.
Off season scouting data shouldn't be an issue
This is what happens when you allow a right to gather food be turned into the privilege of "hunting". Enjoy your slippery slope 👍
that what they want the state owns the wildlife so if they own then they should pay for damage to your car when a deer runs into the side of your car. it was damaged by state owned property pay up
@@kennethharding9118 Might want to rethink that ideology, who funds the state? Taxpayers, or better than that they would likely raise licenses to pay for this mindset hope you are for paying 3to 4 times higher price for tags
How in the hell are they going to in force that on private property
They aren't...
They will rely on tips from other hunters just as how most of their investigations are started currently, they are not hiding in the bushes enforcing laws, they are waiting on phone calls and following up on tips
Thank you.
your welcome!
Hunting over food, plots, and bait should be banned also