What is Organizational Communication? 2.0

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 10 окт 2021
  • This is an updated version of the original What is Organizational Communication? video (2012), which you can still access here: • What is Organizational...
    ---------------
    Download the transcript for this video here:
    ddc08459-231f-4ff4-a268-87d32...
  • КиноКино

Комментарии • 30

  • @mystvandle
    @mystvandle 2 года назад +3

    Great video! I used your old one to help frame the importance of communication in the workplace. Senior leaders I've worked with often think of the transmission model of communications. This is a new concept for many of them.

  • @sudhi6790
    @sudhi6790 2 года назад +1

    Congratulations for 2.0 version. I have used this video in every introductory session.

  • @kitmedjesky9325
    @kitmedjesky9325 2 года назад +1

    I just added the old video to my module on org comm on Friday. I'm so glad to see an updated one!

  • @debbiestover5169
    @debbiestover5169 Год назад +6

    Love this revised video. Much easier for students to grasp.

    • @CommProfProductions
      @CommProfProductions  Год назад

      Thanks Debbie! We certainly tried to make several improvements, so glad to hear you're students grasp this better~

  • @ryanbisel9298
    @ryanbisel9298 2 года назад +1

    Thoughtful and thought-provoking video! I'll be showing this to my org comm students today.

  • @sweet.violets
    @sweet.violets 2 года назад +2

    I'm an incoming college student and this happens to be the course I'll be taking up. Thanks a lot for this video. It was helpful somehow.

  • @alexanderlyon
    @alexanderlyon 2 года назад +1

    Great stuff, Matt. Well done. I was made aware of this from Ryan Bisel's Linkedin post about it. Great stuff.

  • @natalienelson-marsh308
    @natalienelson-marsh308 2 года назад +2

    This is great! Thanks, Matt!

  • @nguyenvanuong3618
    @nguyenvanuong3618 2 года назад +3

    What a clear, concise, easy to understand lecture!
    Thank you for the video, Prof!

  • @ahmedezalden8192
    @ahmedezalden8192 2 года назад +2

    ...... " WOW! " ...........
    ...... Thanks for your efforts ....

  • @cartergomez5390
    @cartergomez5390 3 месяца назад +1

    This is great for my human services administrative course.

  • @xinyuewang9449
    @xinyuewang9449 9 месяцев назад +1

    It really helps! Thx!

  • @madsenincmadseninc1654
    @madsenincmadseninc1654 9 месяцев назад

    Does somebody know wether Koschmann agrees with Feldner & Fykes (2018) approach of the conventional approach? And I would argue that Koschmann agrees with Ryan Bisel (2010), in terms of materialism and objects centered around communication. Where does this put Nicotera (2020)? is Koschmann placing himself in the middle of Feldner & Fyke and Nicotera? I would argue that Nicotera agrees with Feldner & Fyke in terms of process and structure? Does anybody know of this?

  • @user-sg9lc8vh9e
    @user-sg9lc8vh9e 2 месяца назад

    Am i correct to rewrite much ideas on my eesay
    Regardinh effective communication lead to competitive advantage in Logstics industry

  • @laurenciojhonkevinc.8863
    @laurenciojhonkevinc.8863 2 года назад +3

    Correct me if I am wrong, from what I have understood, organizational communication is inherently a constitutional framework of an organization defined through the use of concepts of communication.

  • @gopalsharmab
    @gopalsharmab 2 года назад +1

    Good one

  • @aluay
    @aluay Год назад

    it would be great to have a practical example. For the conventional, there are a lot of examples

  • @gladyssteffanyorbino6466
    @gladyssteffanyorbino6466 2 года назад

    What are the two approaches? I can't merely hear it clearly.

    • @CommProfProductions
      @CommProfProductions  2 года назад +1

      Hi Gladys...the two approaches are (1) communication IN organizations and (2) organizations AS communication
      Hope that helps!

  • @Ranchhouseroad
    @Ranchhouseroad 2 года назад +3

    Let me challenge the idea that tables and chairs have "no inherent meaning ,apart for our interactions with each other". Cheap shitty chairs communicate that you ( or your role) are not valued.

    • @CommProfProductions
      @CommProfProductions  2 года назад +4

      Good point Brandon. But consider: how exactly do cheap chairs do that without human intention and interpretation? The point is that chairs can only communicate value within a communication process that coveys values, beliefs, and norms about status--there's nothing in the materiality of the chair itself that does this apart from human interaction and involvement. This relates to the fascinating concepts of sociomaterialtiy and hybrid agency. Lots of nuanced perspectives within these concepts, but a great place to start if you want to dig deeper~

    • @angelabrasil3900
      @angelabrasil3900 2 года назад +1

      Interesting point Brandon. I feel that judging the furniture may say more about the person doing the judging than the actual value of the personnel in the company. Additionally, there is the concept that, culturally, the expectation for a meeting may not include sitting. There are so many caveats to consider. IE: What if the person coming in was blind? Would the state of the chairs count then?

  • @23media2
    @23media2 2 года назад +5

    you will need to start using real life examples in your videos otherwise it gets more confusing as it gets longer.

    • @aluay
      @aluay Год назад

      true, unless there is a measurable framework, the conventional approach remains the better way

  • @One_of_us_
    @One_of_us_ Год назад +1

    Viscom students 🙋🏻‍♂️