Post Office Horizon Inquiry LIVE: Former Chief Financial Officer Neil McCausland gives evidence
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 14 май 2024
- The inquiry will hear evidence from Mark Callister-Davies, former group communications and corporate affairs director at Post Office Ltd
The Mirror Homepage: www.mirror.co.uk
The Mirror Facebook: / dailymirror
The Mirror IG: / dailymirror
The Mirror TikTok: / dailymirror
The Mirror Twitter: / dailymirror
Sign up for our newsletters: www.mirror.co.uk/email
#TheMirror #News #PostOffice
So many managers - so little management.
yet endless resource on their side compared to the sub-postmasters
Excellent...brilliantly put😅
Given the large number of odious high level employees at the PO, we must assume that they actively filtered promotion and recruitment to seek this type of individual.
It just gets more grimy as more evidence appears , Vennels on the 22nd is going to be interesting .....
Dependant on whether she has done same course as the rest..How to lie like a flatfish
That said it will take a lot to beat Angela for completely unruffled granite faced bare faced lying.
Thanks, I’ve put it in me diary
When this man is feeling under pressure he starts pouting
No remorse, just arrogant obfuscation.
Berk by name, Berk by nature! Absolute Joke!
Erm the description of this video is wrong? its not the CFO Neil McCausland but Patrick Bourke.
There's a very different understanding and interpretation of an 'audit trail' in a Database Management System to an Accountant than there is to a Database Administrator. The inquiry needs to flesh out what each person understands as to the nature of the audit trail that they're talking about. The 40/60 day visibility of the ledger was an open goal yet no question was asked as to 1. what a sub-post master was supposed to do after the time period. And 2. could transactions dated earlier than the 40/60 days be inserted (the answer is yes and so not visible).
Sam Stevens often asks questions that are double negatives by inadvertently including a 'not' or similar word in the question, and so when reviewing answers to such questions then interpretation can go either way.
all these arrogant men played a part in the corrupt prosecutions and went away thinking how macho and successful they had been never ever believing thast one day theu too would be facing questions that reveal pinned their banal evil to the wall.
thgese guyxs should take up a political career as they have shown brilliance in avoiding answering questions, dissembleing , diverting and lying
Aaand... another POL employee with serious memory problems - this time larded with crocodile tears. The clue is in the job title: _Chief Information_ Officer, yet she seems to have no information to hand! She's supposed to be a technical management guru but was incurious and indifferent to Horizon problems crossing her desk _for years._ What an appalling lot at POL.