L' Internationale Anti-révisionniste - The Anti-Revisionist Internationale

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 17 май 2022
  • This is the “anti-revisionist version” of the Internationale prepared by the PCMLF (Parti Communiste Marxiste-Leniniste de France) on January 2, 1968. It is made of three couplets from Pottier's original version (1, 2 and 6) plus the “anti-revisionist verse” specially added and sung in the 4th position.
    Ouvre bien les yeux, camarade,
    Et vois où sont les renégats.
    Sors du brouillard de cette rade
    Rejoints tes frères de combat.
    Crie : À bas le révisionnisme !
    À bas les mystificateurs !
    Vive le marxisme-léninisme,
    Notre idéal libérateur !
    Open your eyes wide, comrade,
    And look, where the renegades are.
    Get out of the mist of this bay
    And join your brothers in struggle.
    Shout: Down with revisionism!
    Down with all mystifiers!
    Long live Marxism-Leninism,
    Our ideal of liberation!
  • ВидеоклипыВидеоклипы

Комментарии • 34

  • @XenGame
    @XenGame Год назад +75

    > claims to be anti-revisionist
    > revises the Internationale

  • @raresman6196
    @raresman6196 12 дней назад +1

    3:20

  • @comrade3537
    @comrade3537 Год назад +3

    How can you revise wiping the slate clean of capitalistic tyranny?

    • @roedagardet
      @roedagardet Год назад +18

      "Revisionism is one form of bourgeois ideology. The revisionists deny the differences between socialism and capitalism, between the dictatorship of the proletariat and the dictatorship of the bourgeoisie. What they advocate is in fact not the socialist line but the capitalist line. In present circumstances, revisionism is more pernicious than dogmatism. One of our current important tasks on the ideological front is to unfold criticism of revisionism."
      -Mao, Speech at the CPC National Conference on Propaganda Work
      "Revisionism, or Right opportunism, is a bourgeois trend of thought that is even more dangerous than dogmatism. The revisionists, the Right opportunists, pay lip service to Marxism; they too attack "dogmatism". However, what they are really attacking is the quintessence of Marxism. They oppose or distort materialism and dialectics, oppose or try to weaken the people's democratic dictatorship and the leading role of the Communist Party, and oppose or try to weaken socialist transformation and socialist construction. After the basic victory of the socialist revolution in our country, there are still a number of people who vainly hope to restore the capitalist system and fight the working class on every front, including the ideological one. Moreover, their right-hand men in this struggle are the revisionists."
      -Mao, On the Correct Handling of Contradictions among the People

    • @doom23997
      @doom23997 Год назад +4

      @@roedagardet Mao was a wise man.

  • @doom23997
    @doom23997 Год назад +14

    Good, you could include Mao there too

    • @smtandearthboundsuck8400
      @smtandearthboundsuck8400 4 месяца назад +2

      Lol the bozo who wanted class collaboration ?

    • @MegaVega2007
      @MegaVega2007 3 месяца назад

      "Socialist states exist, but the communist and workers' parties which lead them do not all stand in genuine Marxist-Leninist positions. There are very markedly anti-Marxist elements among them. China is in this situation. That country is guided by «Mao Tsetung thought» which is not a consistent application of Marxism-Leninism. Fundamental ideas in it are wrong, opportunist, and indeed disguised revisionist. «Mao Tsetung thought», which guides China, does not fight for the revolution, for the unity of the proletariat and, without calling China a «great state» and itself a «universal idea» which replaces Marxism-Leninism, in fact it does such a thing. To the Chinese, he who does not follow «Mao Tsetung thought» and does not identify it with Marxism-Leninism is not a Marxist-Leninist, or is not considered as such. «Mao Tsetung thought» has created great confusion in the ranks of the Chinese and world proletariat. Within China there is anarchy, there are two or a score of lines in the party and among the people. No one knows who has power and who is going to seize it. The Communist Party of China is not constructed according to and based on the Marxist-Leninist principles and norms. The dictatorship of the proletariat does not operate there. This unclarity in China has spread and is spreading to part of the world proletariat and Marxist-Leninist communist parties. Many of these parties are not in agreement either with «Mao Tsetung thought» or with the actions of China, but are not saying so openly. The cult of the great state, which is reputed to be «proletarian» but is not so, is operating, as is the cult of Mao, who is Mao Tsetung and nothing else and, in particular, is neither Marx, Engels, Lenin, nor Stalin. The pseudo-Marxist lackeys who have infiltrated into the ranks of some Marxist-Leninist communist parties are exalting the cult of Mao and giving him pride of place. The bourgeoisie also recognizes the value of China, of Mao and «Mao Tsetung thought», and propagates them. Every revolutionary group, every Marxist-Leninist communist party, indeed, every anarchist group like that of Sartre, etc., is labelled «Maoist» by the bourgeoisie. This is to the liking of China and Mao. China maintains links and assists them all simply because they praise Mao and follow his confused and unclear policy. Anti-Sovietism has become the sole leitmotif of the Chinese leadership, and this not on correct ideological basis, but under the banner of «Mao Tsetung thought» for the domination of the proletariat and the «communist» world. In these conditions and with these ideas the Communist Party of China has stopped inviting Marxist-Leninist communist parties to its congresses, has adopted only bilateral meetings with any Marxist-Leninist communist party to which it propagates «Mao Tsetung thought» and which it advises to attack the Soviet Union, but not the United States of America; it preaches to these parties collaboration with the local reactionary bourgeoisie, even with Franco and Pinochet. Mao and «Maoism» have become one of the most serious obstacles to the unity of the world proletariat and the new Marxist-Leninist communist and workers' parties. Therefore, in everything we must counter this new disguised evil with our unerring Marxist-Leninist theory."
      (Enver Hoxha, Reflections on China, Vol.2, p. 248-250, Eng. Ed.)

    • @e-klav3214
      @e-klav3214 3 месяца назад +1

      @@smtandearthboundsuck8400 Peasant-Proletarian unity is an important part of the Marxist-Leninist struggle in the east, not that I would expect western leftists in their dogmatic bubbles to think otherwise. Mao was wrong in loads of things but accusing Mao of class collaboration is insanity.

    • @smtandearthboundsuck8400
      @smtandearthboundsuck8400 3 месяца назад

      @@e-klav3214 Mussolini was a great and authentic Marxist Leninist i guess

    • @e-klav3214
      @e-klav3214 3 месяца назад

      @@smtandearthboundsuck8400 Mussolini falsely tried to toe the non-existent line of proletarian-bourgeois unity, which isn't a thing, the peasantry has toiling masses within it, the toiling masses within the peasantry are led by the party of the proletariat. Hoxhaists can waffle on, however worldwide and in fact in my own nation, proletarian-middle peasant unity are seen as extremally important by all communists, and really I don't expect better from armchair westerners trying to teach what revolution is to actual Marxist-Leninists from the east. In India, peasant-proletarian unity has been the centre of the proletarian struggle ever since 1925.
      It's amazing how Hoxhaists quite literally tow a line which Stalin himself opposed with the right and left deviationists in Bukharin and Trotsky. You can keep deluding yourself that the average peasant here in India or China back then are landowning kulaks haha

  • @Scifiguy11th
    @Scifiguy11th Год назад +19

    A pro-schism version of an explicitly anti schismatic song? How very leftist.

    • @kosmasnick7417
      @kosmasnick7417 6 месяцев назад +2

      Are you a pro-Cruchev my friend??

    • @Scifiguy11th
      @Scifiguy11th 6 месяцев назад

      @@kosmasnick7417 I'm a Left SR stan.

  • @max-louisvier595
    @max-louisvier595 4 месяца назад +5

    " Il n'est pas de sauveurs suprêmes
    Ni dieu, ni Staline, ni tribun "
    🏴🏴🏴🏴🏴🏴🏴🏴🏴🏴
    Makhnovchtchina, Kronstadt, C.N.T, P.O.U.M !!!

    • @kaiserwilhelmii575
      @kaiserwilhelmii575 3 месяца назад +4

      🤣

    • @pazenearth
      @pazenearth 3 месяца назад +5

      makhnovtchina committed pogroms, kronstadt was anti semitic and supported by white guards, POUM weren't anarchists, and the CNT-FAI had labor camps.

    • @max-louisvier595
      @max-louisvier595 3 месяца назад

      @@pazenearth Une très belle propagande nourrie au sein des adversaires de la liberté, les capitalistes les fascistes et les bolchevik !
      Le POUM, n'était pas anarchiste, mais communiste antistalinien, et durant la guerre d'Espagne le POUM et La CNT/FAI agissaient ensemble !

  • @azerty_42
    @azerty_42 Год назад +22

    > claims to be anti revisionist
    > upholds stalin

    • @roedagardet
      @roedagardet Год назад +50

      Stalin wasn't a revisionist, he was a hardline Marxist who carried the anti-revisionist and socialist trends of Marx, Engels, and Lenin

    • @Ashley-1917
      @Ashley-1917 Год назад +8

      Claims to be anti-revisionist>Upholds Stalin's Menshevik class collaborationism, socialism in one country, revolution by stages, etc

    • @doom23997
      @doom23997 Год назад +2

      Shut up trotskyist

    • @basedcomrade1595
      @basedcomrade1595 9 месяцев назад +15

      ​@@Ashley-1917Trotsky was the semi-Menshevik, not Stalin lol

    • @sifangwuhai
      @sifangwuhai 7 месяцев назад +2

      That is the point