Thank you sir i was struggling to differentiate between 을and를 for almost 3 years. Today i watched your video and got it well. Great job your way of teaching is very much 편해. 감사합니다
Thank you so much! This is a great video, clear and informative (and with an engaging teacher and no annoying background music...). I have subscribed :D You deserve more views.
Just stumbled on your lectures and they are great. But I have a question and I still can’t get a hang of it. Why use a object marking for the word Hiking? Isn’t hiking a verb cause you said eul is used with the noun Hike. I get the concept of topic and subject particles a bit but subject particles still gets confuses me a lot.
Glad you like our videos :) So the word 등산 is a noun, so we can say 등산을. The verb is 등산하다. However, many Korean verbs are made up of noun+하다, and these verbs can be used as a verb, or the noun can be used like the object of the verb 하다. 1. to hike 등산하다 / 등산을 하다 2. to cook 요리하다 / 요리를 하다 3. to study 공부하다 / 공부를 하다 So we can use the verbs as they are, or separate the noun and 하다, and use the noun as the object of the verb. The meaning is exactly the same. Hope that helps!
This is my third video trying to figure out WHYYYYY I should use 을/를 and not 이/가. Because if I said “저는 점심이 먹었어요” wouldn’t that also be okay? I’m going crazy
The key thing to note is that 을/를 marks the object of the verb, so in the sentence 'I ate lunch', lunch (점심) is the object of the verb 'ate' so it HAS TO be used with 을. So the correct sentence for 'I ate lunch' is. 저는 점심을 먹었어요 or 제가 점심을 먹었어요. Similarly, to say 'I watched TV', you would use the object particle 을/를 with TV(티비) because TV is the object of the verb watched, meaning that 'I watched TV' in Korean is. 저는 티비를 봤어요 or 제가 티비를 봤어요. There are certain structural differences depending on whether the verb is a passive verb and whether you're using descriptive verbs (adjectives), but that's the basic overview. Hope that helps to clarify things.
Ahhhhh. So the thing the receives the action gets 을/를. Okay that clears up so much and I really appreciate you taking the time out to tell me all that!
Ur acc is sooo underrated! This deserves more love
Holly hell. I finally found someone who actually explains, how 을 & 를 work. Thank you brother.
Thank you sir i was struggling to differentiate between 을and를 for almost 3 years. Today i watched your video and got it well. Great job your way of teaching is very much 편해. 감사합니다
Thank you so much! This is a great video, clear and informative (and with an engaging teacher and no annoying background music...). I have subscribed :D You deserve more views.
Thanks for another great lesson. As I have said before you have beautiful pronunciation in English.
Thank you! Glad you liked the lesson :)
Please give more lessons on object particles. It is so difficult to understand but you are Great as I am catching up slowly.
안녕하세요 선생님!! 당신은 이 수업을 매우 좋게 가르쳤습니다. 인도에서, 너무 고마워요!!
😊😊
This gave me a lot of clarity, 감사합니다 🙏
Thank you for clarifying further ☺️
Very impormative
Thanks kim! Very helpful .
Hi! Can you help me? Is double particles allowed? Like this one.
저는 한국어"를" 공부거나 드라마"를" 볼 거예요.
Sir first of all thanks for this lesson and also can you help me to know how to say .(used to) in korean
*I used to visit this place
can anyone help me understand this sentence ? thanks :) 그리고 그 길로 한양에 가서 과거를 보아 급제를 했어요
Just stumbled on your lectures and they are great. But I have a question and I still can’t get a hang of it.
Why use a object marking for the word Hiking? Isn’t hiking a verb cause you said eul is used with the noun Hike.
I get the concept of topic and subject particles a bit but subject particles still gets confuses me a lot.
Glad you like our videos :)
So the word 등산 is a noun, so we can say 등산을. The verb is 등산하다. However, many Korean verbs are made up of noun+하다, and these verbs can be used as a verb, or the noun can be used like the object of the verb 하다.
1. to hike 등산하다 / 등산을 하다
2. to cook 요리하다 / 요리를 하다
3. to study 공부하다 / 공부를 하다
So we can use the verbs as they are, or separate the noun and 하다, and use the noun as the object of the verb. The meaning is exactly the same.
Hope that helps!
@@hangulhouse1 thanks much it is helpful
This is my third video trying to figure out WHYYYYY I should use 을/를 and not 이/가. Because if I said “저는 점심이 먹었어요” wouldn’t that also be okay? I’m going crazy
The key thing to note is that 을/를 marks the object of the verb, so in the sentence 'I ate lunch', lunch (점심) is the object of the verb 'ate' so it HAS TO be used with 을. So the correct sentence for 'I ate lunch' is.
저는 점심을 먹었어요 or 제가 점심을 먹었어요.
Similarly, to say 'I watched TV', you would use the object particle 을/를 with TV(티비) because TV is the object of the verb watched, meaning that 'I watched TV' in Korean is.
저는 티비를 봤어요 or 제가 티비를 봤어요.
There are certain structural differences depending on whether the verb is a passive verb and whether you're using descriptive verbs (adjectives), but that's the basic overview. Hope that helps to clarify things.
Ahhhhh. So the thing the receives the action gets 을/를. Okay that clears up so much and I really appreciate you taking the time out to tell me all that!