Regenerating Warfighting Credibility for European NATO Air Forces | Professor Justin Bronk

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 16 окт 2024

Комментарии • 24

  • @danielcanov3032
    @danielcanov3032 Год назад +16

    Prof. Justin Bronk always provides excelent analysis on these topics. Really enjoyed the last episode with Ward Carroll. Keep up the good work!

    • @Aeronaut1975
      @Aeronaut1975 Год назад +1

      He's a Professor, not just a Doctor.

    • @danielcanov3032
      @danielcanov3032 Год назад +1

      @@Aeronaut1975 My apologies, thanks for pointing it out. I will correct my post.

  • @elwoodzo
    @elwoodzo Год назад +6

    Cant wait to hear Mooch call you Prof! Well done 😁

  • @964cuplove
    @964cuplove Год назад +3

    Tip from a VFX person, get a Rusi blue foto background, that would get you a much better looking video
    Appreciate your work and the professional comments both here and on Ward Carrol’ls channel 👍👍

  • @rickrick196
    @rickrick196 Год назад

    Love your informed presentation skills

  • @UTubeGuyJK
    @UTubeGuyJK Год назад +1

    Justin!

  • @griffith500tvr
    @griffith500tvr Год назад +1

    Hi Justin, thank you for being such a competent expert. Only critic in this case is the blue screen setup, there must be better options, look at the white graphic errors around your head.

  • @albertgerard4639
    @albertgerard4639 Год назад

    Our lord and savior, justin bronk

  • @FranksMSFlightSimulator
    @FranksMSFlightSimulator Год назад +1

    Excellent from JB, as usual. Putin/Russia has stuffed-up. Hope people listen. Must now go and read the report. Love JB! Cheers.

  • @vtheman1850
    @vtheman1850 Год назад +1

    Fun Fact, the RUSI acronym translates to "Russians" :D just thought it was a funny coincidence.

  • @Lost-In-Blank
    @Lost-In-Blank Год назад +3

    @justinbronk Given that the Russo-Ukrainian War may go on for another year, even two, and given that both the F-16 and the Typhoon require too much highly trained ground support for Ukraine, do you think it makes sense for the US and other NATO countries to sponsor SAAB to urgent enhancement the Grippen production line?

  • @aon10003
    @aon10003 Год назад +1

    You cant have endless supply of money.

  • @madzen112
    @madzen112 Год назад

    Not a job I'd pick

  • @MaryJones-d7e
    @MaryJones-d7e 22 дня назад

    Martin Jose Robinson Ronald Robinson Robert

  • @มดแดง-ฃ3ข
    @มดแดง-ฃ3ข 10 месяцев назад

    ปูตินออกเงินเราเคยตกลงกันไว้ที่ 60%

  • @liberty-matrix
    @liberty-matrix Год назад +4

    "It is abundantly clear now that Russia could march all the way to Berlin, all the way to Paris. And NATO could do nothing about it except for nuclear weapons, which would be repaid in kind and then the end of the world." ~George Galloway

  • @magnaviator
    @magnaviator Год назад

    A less costly solution is to stop provoking Russia, and recognize that Russia has legitimate security interests in not having NATO aggressively push up to Russia's very borders. Likewise with respect to China and China's borders. Likewise with respect to the US and the US's borders. This is basic common sense. The only reason NATO did so was because of US and NATO's contempt for Russia's military capability and the fallacious belief that Russia was incapable of preventing NATO expansion, a belief that has been disproved on the wreckage of Ukraine.