Commander Ban Results in HUGE Losses on Dockside, Lotus and Mana Crypt

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 19 окт 2024

Комментарии • 755

  • @zappadali8696
    @zappadali8696 25 дней назад +239

    Any idiot who paid the prices for jeweled and crypt deserves to be pointed and laughed at.

    • @JakeandJoelareMagic
      @JakeandJoelareMagic  25 дней назад +179

      Don’t cut yourself on all that edge, champ.

    • @metalthrashingnerdpodcast9864
      @metalthrashingnerdpodcast9864 25 дней назад +102

      @@JakeandJoelareMagic while harsh in his take, he has a point. Investing in magic is a terrible idea unless you are buying reserved list cards. It's a very unstable market and these bans have just shown a whole group of players that it can happen at any given time. After collecting, buying, selling and trading for over 25 years I've seen it happen with power creep, modern and legacy bannings, and wizards random urge to reprint cards into oblivion.
      Also I'm baffled how no one thought "hmm should I spend this much money for a card that's most viable use is in a variant competitive version of a casual format that's ban list is based on a philosophy of a non competitive experience?"

    • @darkperihellion
      @darkperihellion 25 дней назад +17

      Why's that? cuz you can't keep up with actual good decks? I am laughing at you right now with your poor vision.

    • @Janbo.C137
      @Janbo.C137 25 дней назад +20

      @@metalthrashingnerdpodcast9864 Yeah. They already mentioned that this will probably teach some people not to invest in MTG products. Outstanding move.

    • @ThePompell
      @ThePompell 25 дней назад +27

      @@JakeandJoelareMagic He is a jerk but this should serve as lesson to those who treated magic as an investment. Buy the cards you like at a price you're ok with if it hits zero. That being said the way they banned is pretty unhinge and i understand the frustration especially since the RC knows how WOTC has been fostering investing in card mentality.

  • @iekie
    @iekie 25 дней назад +77

    I hope that it will send a message to people that only see investments in those cards. this is a collecting and playable card game, not a speculation market. We shouldn't pay that much to play the game.

    • @pr0fess0rbadass
      @pr0fess0rbadass 24 дня назад +8

      Yep, people think they're mad at the RC. But deep inside, they're actually mad at themselves for making dumb decisions and only just realizing it. 😂

    • @mastershake42019
      @mastershake42019 23 дня назад +1

      @@pr0fess0rbadass so everyone who plays Cedh is stupid?

    • @dilonharms5409
      @dilonharms5409 23 дня назад

      ​@@mastershake42019 yup. They sure are.

    • @jamesfilyawDigginGabe
      @jamesfilyawDigginGabe 22 дня назад

      ​@mastershake42019 people who play cEDH are playing the game, not treating it like an investment. Magic is a game, not stocks.

    • @wisconsincheez2307
      @wisconsincheez2307 19 дней назад +1

      @@iekie people generally like to collect things that have value.

  • @dreadedevil4055
    @dreadedevil4055 25 дней назад +138

    My main thought is that I'm never going to buy an expensive card again, and if I want to use them I'm switching to proxies only. I pulled a Jeweled Lotus from a pack around a year ago and my brother got me a Dockside as a birthday gift, so both of those memories are a little bit soured by this experience. I also pulled a List Ancient Tomb a couple years ago and with this ban, I have to assume that it's on the chopping block soon too, since it matches the profile of their explanation for why the other fast mana cards were banned, and unlike Sol Ring, it's a rare and expensive card.

    • @nonameimpotantlive9233
      @nonameimpotantlive9233 25 дней назад +2

      Yeah I pulled Fury nice it got banned I'm really against ban unless card are hyper annoying but then first Restrict to 1 and Commander I honestly dont care if cards is op or not there

    • @thatmtgnerd
      @thatmtgnerd 25 дней назад +7

      At least with tomb its price is held up by legacy. So many decks run it.

    • @vitorgomes6762
      @vitorgomes6762 25 дней назад

      Lost me at proxies.
      Cheater

    • @delailama736
      @delailama736 25 дней назад +9

      Why not just not buy insanely OP cards that completely ruin formats?

    • @MNKRTRBUTN
      @MNKRTRBUTN 25 дней назад

      @@delailama736 If you want to compete against the other decks using the OP expensive cards then you need to run them as well if you don’t care about winning then it doesn’t matter but pretty much everyone who plays Cedh wants to win. Also there is always the argument just to proxy but if you are someone who just can’t stand the thought up putting fake cards in your deck then you have to get the expensive cards.

  • @CallsignShowtime
    @CallsignShowtime 25 дней назад +20

    As a budget player and a financial analyst, its been interesting to watch the meltdown across the community when their artificially inflated investments have their bubble "pop." I don't blame people at all for going to proxying or other means of protecting their value. Hopefully some people learned lessons about smart and healthy investing practices.

    • @toedrag-release
      @toedrag-release 25 дней назад +3

      The thing is the players upset weren't buying them as an "investment" they were playing the cards in their deck they're mad because the cards cost alot of money to play. Imagine buying a 100$ game on xbox only for the game to suddenly lose support and not work anymore. You'd be pretty mad about it. The other thing is things like crypt and fast mana people are pretty intelligent with when to pull "that" deck out. The game is good at policing itself to match everybody's deck levels. If a player is using a precon typically people aren't whipping out their deck that runs fast mana and they match the other players power level at the table the best they can. The bans (except for Nadu) were unnecessary. Mana crypt has been in the format since its inception it's never been a problem really, I've never seen anybody crying for it to be banned.

    • @sablesalt
      @sablesalt 25 дней назад +6

      ​@@toedrag-release you still own the card, it's not that deep

    • @toedrag-release
      @toedrag-release 25 дней назад +1

      @@sablesalt you'd still own that game

    • @sablesalt
      @sablesalt 25 дней назад +4

      @@toedrag-release yeah, thankfully cardboard doesn't need a server connection like it does.

    • @toedrag-release
      @toedrag-release 25 дней назад +1

      @@sablesalt sure the 100$ peice of cardboard is now a bookmark and the $100 disk is now a coaster
      Toe may toe Toe Mat toe

  • @xerothedarkstar
    @xerothedarkstar 25 дней назад +141

    Mana Crypt and Jeweled Lotus were too expensive for me to play anyway, so I didn't lose out on those, Dockside didn't fit my play style and everyone knew Nadu was a mistake as soon as it was spoiled. Ain't no thing for me.

    • @Lorry_Draws
      @Lorry_Draws 25 дней назад +7

      Just print them, why give wizards money. Chess isn't pay to win

    • @Janbo.C137
      @Janbo.C137 25 дней назад +6

      ​@@Lorry_DrawsWhy not just play chess then? If you dont like the fact that limited availability is a part of the game.

    • @Transformers4444
      @Transformers4444 25 дней назад +7

      ​​@@Janbo.C137Proxying (like they said) skips the limited availability problem so I don't think they care lol why would they play chess? It was a comparison to another game with varying game pieces and how that game doesn't have ridiculously expensive pieces
      Limited availability is one of the worst parts of the game. We fool ourselves into thinking that 10 cent pieces of cardboard are worth hundreds of dollars, and wotc loves this because people buy their overpriced crap and let them keep making money off of artificial scarcity. Proxying is the way to go, it makes the game accessible. I'd rather play against someone and see their deckbuilding choices and playstyle, not how deep their pockets are.

    • @bewbunyon1
      @bewbunyon1 25 дней назад +1

      ​@@Janbo.C137These people just don't understand the "Big picture".

    • @Janbo.C137
      @Janbo.C137 25 дней назад

      @@Transformers4444 Ok. Try again when you have learned what a TCG is and how value is created. The concept of money would be a good starting point. Best of luck.

  • @rodrigodaux7439
    @rodrigodaux7439 23 дня назад +6

    Completely agree with Josh when he said: Bans shouldnt be made when people arent split up like this one. Bans should be when a major problem with the format is located and the vast majority agreed with that ban. Nothing like this out of nowhere ban of staples. Cmon…

    • @lifebfdeath6294
      @lifebfdeath6294 15 дней назад

      These cards were very much problems, especially dockside extortionist which is the card I’m the most happiest about being banned 😂

  • @MikeTheElderMillennial
    @MikeTheElderMillennial 22 дня назад +2

    They could have preserved the value of these cards and preserved the casual gameplay experience by simply announcing CEDH will now be a separate format.

  • @DGlattiator
    @DGlattiator 24 дня назад +3

    I think this hits harder than it should because the community is so against proxies. The rules committee sets such strict standards for play and can choose whatever they want. They are not regulated by WotC and lost Sheldon last year.
    cEDH proxy everything and even allow it to be tournament legal.
    Another hot take is that they should have a "banned as commander" list separately from outright banned.

  • @jeanpierrepolnareff2356
    @jeanpierrepolnareff2356 25 дней назад +32

    Anyone who is mad at the rules committee is entirely missing the point this is 100% on wizard's shoulders for designing cards specifically to break formats to sell sets

    • @charredhusk
      @charredhusk 25 дней назад +8

      Ah yes, Mana Crypt. A card famously made 29 years ago to sell to the Commander players that didn’t exist yet.
      Look, I agree with you on the other 3, but banning a card that is older than the format doesn’t quite line up there. Mana Crypt wasn’t a problem for 99.99% of players, and that’s pretty obvious from it existing since day 1…

    • @cowman22ish
      @cowman22ish 25 дней назад +4

      ​@@charredhuskto be fair, the special guest mana crypts were one of the main selling points of LCI because of commander

    • @charredhusk
      @charredhusk 25 дней назад +1

      @@cowman22ish that is true, but the card is also collectible because of its age and lack of overall reprints. It’s not unreasonable to think it could have been appealing even without commander.
      It would have been MUCH less appealing, but I doubt anyone will argue that Mana Crypt is the only one of these 4 cards that is still going to have some worth after this. Both momentarily and just for collections.

    • @pr0fess0rbadass
      @pr0fess0rbadass 24 дня назад +1

      Yeah. The problem isn't that they were banned. The problem is how they got so expensive in the first place

    • @prestonbeaulieu4379
      @prestonbeaulieu4379 24 дня назад

      ​@@charredhusk"how could they kill mana crypt! I only had 29 years to play with it!" -🤡

  • @kennybell4501
    @kennybell4501 22 дня назад +2

    We need to sue the rules committee. It’s the only way. There are so many less competitive cedh decks now it’s not right! This band was purely to send a message to anybody who plays cedh or is just a collector. You can basically say that the rules committee stole well over $20 million from the community.

  • @thetruthisoutthere8714
    @thetruthisoutthere8714 25 дней назад +11

    I learned after dropping 2 bills on Borderless Ugin, just months before a very similar printing was released, that spending that much on a card is dumb.
    I'm glad I only got Dockside ages ago, and a pretty good deal on Lotus. Having all these reprints and special versions less than a year ago too... Ouch.
    I'm torn, but could've seen it coming. Only really changes if your playgroup agrees, though...

  • @Mississippi_Jack
    @Mississippi_Jack 23 дня назад +1

    Ask yourself this: If they released Commander Masters 2 in the near future, containing reprints of Thassa's Oracle, Mana Vault, Rhystic Study, Chrome Mox, and Mox Opal, would you consider buying it? If the answer is no, then Wizards has a serious problem on their hands. People aren't stupid, and if you spit in their face and take them for a fool, they aren't gonna be keen on buying your product in the future. This decision will ripple through game stores and go down as a true business blunder if Wizards doesn't do something to restore consumer confidence. The banlist is a marketing tool, after all, and if it hurts the most passionate players of your game, things aren't gonna end well.

  • @chestnutmouse6823
    @chestnutmouse6823 24 дня назад +2

    When I stopped playing Yugioh in person I sold my collection and used some of it to buy a Mana Crypt, feels bad now…

  • @liberty2087
    @liberty2087 24 дня назад +3

    The cope from the people who are mad about this is hilarious. Sucks to be a store, but even as someone who lost about $500 from the bans, how is it not clear that this is better for the format? All the whales FINALLY wanting to proxy is hilarious though. Funny that it took their playthings getting banned to realize they can simply draw on basics and no one will gaf.

  • @elementalfl1ght
    @elementalfl1ght 25 дней назад +13

    I bought a few collector boxes for a hunt of the mana crypt and jeweled lotus in the last 4 months. I was lucky to pull one of each, but now I will just proxy cards that are worth more than $20. I can support my LGS. Especially for pre-release, but I won't go crazy with collector boxes anymore...

    • @vitorgomes6762
      @vitorgomes6762 25 дней назад +3

      Lost me at proxies
      Cheater

    • @elementalfl1ght
      @elementalfl1ght 25 дней назад +8

      @vitorgomes6762 I don't stack my deck or fake shuffle. I have been playing since 1997 without buying any proxies. I finally decide to not spend for over priced cards that would just drop in value in a couple of months. Aren't all cards just cardboard. The token cards we used are technically proxy cards anyway. At my LGS some kids around 12 use proxies (dry erase), and we all cheer them on because we want new players to feel welcome. Sorry you feel this way.

    • @vitorgomes6762
      @vitorgomes6762 25 дней назад +2

      @elementalfl1ght sorry mate but you keep losing me every time you mentions proxies.
      Proxies are for bitter players, fake players and assholes

    • @ozzysmith2571
      @ozzysmith2571 25 дней назад

      ​@@vitorgomes6762then you must play them cuz you're a real fucking loser here.

    • @joshuaweifenbach815
      @joshuaweifenbach815 25 дней назад

      ​@vitorgomes6762 I proxy as well as my friends do. Sometimes, we don't want to spend 40+ bux on cards that will potentially get banned now. But you calling us that, your the type that don't have the courage or convictions to say it to people's face. Rather easy to hide behind the keyboard/phone.

  • @Maxor369
    @Maxor369 25 дней назад +65

    Simple solution. Ban everything. Go full scorched Earth. Just go to your locals and just stare down at each for a riveting game of EDH until the last one blinks.

    • @jessevandez
      @jessevandez 25 дней назад +4

      Thank you for giving me the laugh I needed today

    • @Financialcoachchris
      @Financialcoachchris 25 дней назад +1

      I mean this is the most logical. There is no reason to start banning more cards

    • @nicholaslangrock475
      @nicholaslangrock475 25 дней назад +6

      Yes, banning fast mana is the same as banning everything, what a reasonable and rational response

    • @origaminosferatu3357
      @origaminosferatu3357 25 дней назад +2

      Ban everything except barren glory. First one to play it and survive until upkeep wins.

    • @ShadowspawnVII
      @ShadowspawnVII 25 дней назад +1

      ​@nicholaslangrock475 banning everything is silly but he's clearly joking but by the RC logic they should ban ancient tomb, sol ring and all mox

  • @linguaphile9415
    @linguaphile9415 23 дня назад +1

    I own a Jeweled Lotus and a Dockside Extortionist. I got them for my last birthday and wanted to use them primarily to make slower decks work in a casual kind of game, e. g. in high cmc decks like dragon typal. The loss of value is a bit annoying, but I think I'm okay with the bans. I mean I don't play in sanctioned tournaments (are there any for commander?) and you can still play the cards privately.
    Edit: I think it might be a good middle way to set a rule 0 that Dockside may not be used to combo off with cards like Deadeye Navigator or Chthonian Nightmare and that cards like Mana Crypt and Jeweled Lotus may only be used in decks with above average cmcs. That way a one-sided gameplay could be rendered less likely. I mean whenever I played Miirym, I would be killed before I could even bring my first dragon into play. I don't want to play unfairly, I just want to participate and develop my game.

  • @RukiHyena
    @RukiHyena 25 дней назад +4

    I said it before and i'll say it again, after these bans I'm not buying staples that are higher than $20 anymore, seems nothing is safe after seeing all of these fast manna bans.

    • @nothingbutstatic
      @nothingbutstatic 23 дня назад

      Pretty much nothing should cost significantly more than that if it's in sets currently in print. If it does, that should be your clue the card is busted.

  • @Einherjar1349
    @Einherjar1349 25 дней назад +17

    That’s the reason I play budget/semi-budget decks, I spare a headache and don’t loose a huge investment if something gets banned

    • @bewbunyon1
      @bewbunyon1 25 дней назад

      Understandable. But, that's seems similar to those who avoid relationships to avoid the possibility of being hurt. Those people still can have a level of contentment. But not really experiencing life. Magic is just a game. Many love it. It's a big part of their lives. I've met many friends through the game. It's sad to see the game that we love [seemingly] trying to hurt us and make us not be able to trust it.

    • @jonjonhholt
      @jonjonhholt 25 дней назад +4

      Ok lmao lets not be overly dramatic XD there is an absurd amount of fun to be had in commander without dropping a thousand dollars on a deck. My favorite commander deck costs less than a single mana crypt. I get people are butthurt over their cards losing value but the bans are all ritual-like effects which are feelsbad in casual(that said i do think there should be a separate cedh banlist tho wouldnt be mad if these were banned there too)

    • @Implicit_Truth
      @Implicit_Truth 25 дней назад +2

      @@Einherjar1349 Totally agree. I own 15+ decks and not a single one has a budget over $100, and my friends and I use this as a house rule. It leads to much better gameplay in my opinion.

    • @darkperihellion
      @darkperihellion 25 дней назад

      The problem with their vision is they even think about banning cards like Sol Ring. They might as well cancel the commander project and stick to competitive vintage and standard at this point ffs. -_-

    • @jonjonhholt
      @jonjonhholt 24 дня назад

      @@darkperihellion ok but the format would benefit from a sol ring ban… it represents such insane mana acceleration that can go in any deck. The issue is that with 100 cards and only a single sol ring the odds of drawing it are relatively low but when drawn it has a disproportionate impact on the game and its pacing. And since the odds are so low to draw it in a given game you basically never end up in a game where everyone draws it so there are always players who don’t draw sol ring and feel helplessly behind the player(s) who did draw sol ring.

  • @Schmanton
    @Schmanton 25 дней назад +18

    At this point we should bann thassas oracle too. So cedh gets a complete new shell.

    • @sablesalt
      @sablesalt 25 дней назад +2

      Thoracle honestly does have it coming, I much prefer the era of lab man as he is much more intractable, while I don't mind thoracle or even flash hulk when it was around I do get they aren't really inductive of a competitive format by being around.
      I would say a good benchmark to decide what is too good in terms of win con potency is doomsday as it is very threatening but not overbearing as there are plenty of things that don't win the game as concisely but are better most of the time.

  • @hillsreptiles769
    @hillsreptiles769 25 дней назад +4

    I will no longer buy collector boxes

    • @rimmythejobber1251
      @rimmythejobber1251 24 дня назад

      ^^^ This. Personally I’ve never agreed with the collectors series and the egregious pricing they’ve allowed the secondary market to curate around it. Always felt a little sleazy once WOTC started putting chase cards that weren’t even from the set in them just to drive player interest. I thought the point of a collectors set was the limited aspect of getting highly stylized version of the cards from THAT set!

  • @kendallschroeder3670
    @kendallschroeder3670 25 дней назад +2

    I think the bans were handed poorly and personally I don't think they should have been banned. The community's poor communication with itself should have been corrected not removing cards that provide insensitive to stay in the game of magic, right now it has shaken the foundations of what this game is because it brings into question what cards are safe or not, and any experience or remotely powerful cards could be banned because they are too fast or too good, and with the constant creep in power that cards are getting doing this isn't going to solve the problem only make it worse to the point that years down the line, we look at the very real possiblity of being forced to play with only vanilla creatures, and the weakest legendary creatures around. That is how one stops power creep, remove all powerful cards. If I'm not mistaken this ban removed $128 million from the magic economy, that is a big hit to the players and local stores, it doesn't feel good.

  • @MilkshakeSkunkette
    @MilkshakeSkunkette 25 дней назад +11

    this is a terrible precedent to set.
    I'm not spending a cent on magic cards unless this decision gets reneged.
    why spend a dime on cards when cards can be struck from our format for being "to generically good".
    i can accept cards that break the format.
    i can accept cards that create an unfun experience (stasis and Armageddon still here laughin' at that logic)
    but hitting fast mana? no thanks.
    Why ever try and optimize and improve our decks performance when the rules committee could just have a bad day and decide "you know what, ban that card. its too 'GeNeRiCaLlY gOoD'

    • @pr0fess0rbadass
      @pr0fess0rbadass 24 дня назад

      This is a good precedent. Cards should not cost that much in the first place. PERIOD. Y'all are just mad you're only realizing it now.

    • @MilkshakeSkunkette
      @MilkshakeSkunkette 23 дня назад

      @@pr0fess0rbadass i agree cards shouldnt cost that much- WOTC controls that though- not the RC

  • @phillipspeers9140
    @phillipspeers9140 25 дней назад +3

    Financially I saw a dip in my collections overall value and today it has recovered mostly due to the rise of mana vault. Probably temp gains. Playability wise I find casual commander to be rather boring. I don’t play much but cEDH is what kept me interested and what content I engaged most with on RUclips. I feel Jeweled lotus and Mana crypt bans should have been discussed openly before they happen.

  • @IamJoshEast
    @IamJoshEast 25 дней назад +3

    Who is paying $50 for a card you literally cannot use anywhere

  • @ozzysmith2571
    @ozzysmith2571 25 дней назад +4

    My future is, as a commander only player, I see no reason to not go proxy only going forward.

  • @minashelley9740
    @minashelley9740 25 дней назад +10

    I feel bad for the effect it will have on owners of special treatments and editions. These cards were way to expensive for me to play. I hope this has the effect of splitting cedh and edh. I think that would be healthy for both formats.

  • @mick1665
    @mick1665 25 дней назад +2

    This was clearly Targeting the CEDH part and it is clear to me that they should stop messing with EDH and make a separate RC. EDH has always been a place where almost every card can be played. I play in a pod with high power decks and these cards are staples in most decks ( except nadu ) i am not a fan of EDH becoming another mordern or legacy with ban after ban......

  • @garypfannes5630
    @garypfannes5630 23 дня назад +1

    Was on the fence about proxying now firmly in the proxy side after this ban

  • @ernie.zer0
    @ernie.zer0 25 дней назад +9

    Yes, I can still rule zero them, and Yes, I can still put them in my cube.
    I only have 1 copy of each of the Lotus, Crypt and Dockside; I wasn't planning on selling them anyway. But what it has done is make me far more reluctant to pick up any other cEDH stables that are high value, such as Ancient Tomb and Fetchlands (as I have none of those), even Mana Drain and other top tier counterspells, tutors and removal are making me nervous to pick up.
    All you hear are people saying "just proxy" or "just rule zero them", but that was easily done before the ban, but you didn't have as much upset.

    • @BDCMatt
      @BDCMatt 25 дней назад

      100% done with chase variants or whatever. Time to almost never get excited for new cards ever again...

    • @thejunecooperative
      @thejunecooperative 24 дня назад +2

      It's worth noting that the fetch lands are staples in legacy and modern so a ban there wouldn't matter

  • @raydelmartinez2905
    @raydelmartinez2905 25 дней назад +5

    I have a feeling they will be playable again in the future, so I would like to pick up a copy of each ( except for Nadu, which was a mistake ).
    But even at their current price they are way out of my budget.

  • @rodrigodaux7439
    @rodrigodaux7439 23 дня назад +2

    From the game aspect, theese bans probably make sense. But magic always has been about the gathering. And they completely forgot about it. Collecting Magic The Gathering expensive cards now is a pretty bad decision.

  • @davemancini8385
    @davemancini8385 24 дня назад +1

    Retroactively deflating worth is a huge problem. I've been holding a gaea's cradle since it got pulled in '99... Just waiting for that to plummit now

  • @Mississippi_Jack
    @Mississippi_Jack 23 дня назад +5

    It's kind of insane how much hate people are getting for being upset that their expensive staples became near worthless overnight. You know most of the people who got burned by this aren't mtg investors but people who owned a couple copies of expensive staples they enjoyed playing with. You are allowed to be upset that a committee of unaccountable people tanked the price of three of the biggest chase cards in the format with no prior warning after sitting on their hands for a decade.

  • @crashdnc1585
    @crashdnc1585 25 дней назад +1

    This scares me not only as a player but to see buissness owner be out thousands of dollars, it makes me worry if the mox diamond, lions eye or even the dual lands could be next? Am i just gunna light my money on fire at this point. Personal opinion is to revert this next month for mana crypt and jeweled lotus. I feel This decision was made under the assumption that no one was having the conversation of what kind of game are we playing. I think its fine to shift the format but this decision has killed alot of high cmc commanders.

    • @nothingbutstatic
      @nothingbutstatic 23 дня назад

      This is one format with its own rules committee that you don't even have to listen to if you're playing casually with friends, which is how the format was designed anyway. Dual lands are staples in legacy, and not going anywhere.

  • @HupfDole87
    @HupfDole87 24 дня назад +1

    I pulled a mana crypt and was happy. Now they just canceled the value it had. So why should I bother buying other sets? They might just ban the most expensive cards in these as well. Keep in mind that they PUSHED mana crypt in lost caverns of ixalan. That was not even a year ago. Right after advertising the shit out of it they banned it. Greedy and shady shit right there.

  • @someguy4661
    @someguy4661 24 дня назад +1

    while my collection is worth less money now, Magic should always be about accessibility and the joy of playing the game. This source of intrinsic enjoyment that we all share is corrupted by its treatment as a financial investment. $50 is still too much for any game piece

  • @catholicguy3605
    @catholicguy3605 25 дней назад +15

    Not a big deal. It's the first commander ban in forever

  • @AlphaCitizen
    @AlphaCitizen 25 дней назад +1

    cEDH is looking to splinter off. Over 1100 people in a day joined the cEDH Advisory Group discord. Discussions have already begun about how to properly choose what qualifies someone to be nominated, eligible to be voted into the RC

  • @iamkyle123able
    @iamkyle123able 25 дней назад +1

    Dockside was just a matter of time imo. The other bans I definitely don’t agree with.

  • @Nex41354
    @Nex41354 20 дней назад +1

    After much though. Much talk amongst friends, players alike, it seems with all the financial ruin and collapse and quiltings on Magic, that through it all it seems the only real, good, or logical outcome IS that this was done for the health of the format. Bc it seems to have ruined everything but. So, maybe the RC is honest and did it for the best. It certainly makes newer commanders and cards that have a high power level harder to access early on, thus creating the return to balance--removal. Removal is the checks and balances of Magic the Gathering. Oh got a Grislebrand? Swords to Plowshares. Got a Golos, Resculpt that bisshh.

  • @reginaldjackson5288
    @reginaldjackson5288 25 дней назад +23

    I’m selling all my cards and proxing my decks after this

    • @vitorgomes6762
      @vitorgomes6762 25 дней назад +3

      Speaking like a cheater

    • @asmodean7239
      @asmodean7239 25 дней назад

      @@vitorgomes6762 Sounds like brainrot? What’s the cheat here exactly? Not giving WOTC more money? This guys must be a monster!

    • @CokaShimoda
      @CokaShimoda 25 дней назад

      ​@@vitorgomes6762 What does that mean? Playing with proxies is not cheating my guy.

    • @asmodean7239
      @asmodean7239 25 дней назад +1

      @@vitorgomes6762Speaking like a person with IQ of 60.

    • @bewbunyon1
      @bewbunyon1 25 дней назад

      Everyone does this and magic dies. Good plan. Great way to support your community. Gonna be playing with a few friends at home in the future until y'all get bored with the game. But you'll only be out money for printing supplies.

  • @TheShiningGyarados93
    @TheShiningGyarados93 25 дней назад +1

    The game is imploding on bad decision after bad decision. Improper play testing will lead to the destruction of every format.

  • @BattleAxeRX
    @BattleAxeRX 24 дня назад +1

    They'll go up again when cedh becomes its own format.

  • @victor2884
    @victor2884 25 дней назад +7

    Just imagine all the remaining collector boxes whose chase card was supposed to be jeweled lotus.. huge loss for stores and people holding sealed product:)

    • @jeremysmith4620
      @jeremysmith4620 25 дней назад +4

      This has been far too small a part of the conversation. The one segment of Magic hurt the most by this isn't players with 1 copy of these cards, it is Local Game Stores left holding the bag. LGS locations already survive on ridiculously small margins on new Magic product. Singles are the solitary decent markup item when it comes to Magic for LGS locations. Now many of them are taking massive losses when simply trying to keep their single selection as expansive as possible for the benefit of their player base and to keep the lights on. That doesn't even speak to any sealed product these locations are now loosing money on, like you brought up.

    • @Implicit_Truth
      @Implicit_Truth 25 дней назад

      @@jeremysmith4620 Historically speaking, bans of high valued cards very rarely hurt vendors outside of the short term because cards for the next most viable strategies in the format increase in price as a result of bans. e.g mana vault seeing a 30+% spike in price yesterday. If vendors are diversified enough in their singles, they should experience no hit whatsoever.
      With one exception... if this banning leads to a reduction in the average price of cards due to reduced consumer confidence, vendors will experience some medium-term losses that will eventually be mostly alleviated by their own expenses in purchasing cards being reduced as well. But this would be a good thing in my opinion, consumer confidence is too high, and the prices of singles do not properly reflect the risk of future devaluation.

    • @nothingbutstatic
      @nothingbutstatic 23 дня назад

      ​​@@jeremysmith4620is the sealed pricing built around jeweled lotus selling for like $100 though? Or was that a function of WoTC not realizing how much demand there would be? Because historically, the best cards currently in print never sold for more than $25. This was even true of black lotus way back in 1993.

  • @zackyounger603
    @zackyounger603 25 дней назад +1

    If you saved and bought the cards or pulled them, we lost the most! Fuck any one who thinks different. They must play pauper or budget or just hate!!

  • @seanallwang3290
    @seanallwang3290 25 дней назад +1

    I will proxy. I will probably not buy sealed. If it's for commander, I will proxy.

  • @casperionx
    @casperionx 25 дней назад +3

    The game isn’t about commander. It should be all about standard and everything else fits around it.

    • @aunthemod
      @aunthemod 23 дня назад

      Standard is no longer the most popular format in Magic: The Gathering (MTG), and interest in it is mostly limited to Magic Arena. The popularity of Standard has been overshadowed by Modern and Commander.
      Standard was once the most widely-played format in MTG. However, there is little interest in Standard outside of Magic Arena.

    • @casperionx
      @casperionx 23 дня назад

      @@aunthemod thats fair, but the reason we are in this mess is because they're printing cards JUST for commander, that are highly sought after. Honestly, if they made just standard sets (yes still can have cards referencing multiple players), and then other cards filter through to other formats it would be good. It would also drive people to play standard more as well. Hell standard is better than ever, its better than Pioneer, better than modern (cheaper) and better than commander. Commander was always meant to be about janky combos and random fun stuff, never ultra efficient sources of advantage - leave that to modern/vintage. I know from experience, you buy a pack of cards for a standard set, and more often than not, there is a commander card or a reprint not valid in standard, and it turns people off playing standard. Everything you get in a standard pack should be standard legal. If we went back to that style, it would change the game up.
      And to be fair, the only reason why everyone is upset about these bans, is because unlike every other single ban and restricted announcement, there was 0 heads up this was gonna happen

    • @nothingbutstatic
      @nothingbutstatic 23 дня назад

      ​@@casperionxnot a problem if they make cards just for commander, but if they somehow make it into standard packs, they need to be commons. The problem is no single card currently in print should command $100 price tag on the secondary market. It's understandable competitive commander players are salty they laid out that kind of cash, but the more important issue is still gameplay. And if the cards provide too significant of an advantage/make the game less fun for everyone, then it makes sense to ban them.

  • @asmodean7239
    @asmodean7239 25 дней назад +5

    To be honest I am kind of fed up with any EDH bans (if it isn’t competitive EDH). I just lose money and have to change my favourite decks again and again. I had to dismantle my favourite Golos 200 card deck (I have mana and utility base and then shuffle bomb deck and randomly add it to lands and ramp/utility - that way you get new fun, bomb-heavy deck every time and when you spin Golos you always get unexpected new stuff). These bans serve no purpose - they are completely arbitrary and aren’t based on any objective reasonable data, just on what ban committee “feels like”, like - “this card is to prevalent”, this card is too annoying to play against, this is too easy to win with or smh. In EDH we have so many annoying cards, so many super-strong cards, so many prevalent cards, this is social format we can decide stuff in our playgroup. And let’s be real - pretty much no one is coming to new pot of players tying to win as fast and as dominant as possible - we all just try our ideas and certain archetypes. Was Dockside fine before, was mana crypt fine before? Why ban them now in particular??? It just looks like - they got fed up with them now and finally decided to ban them. Why do we have to listen to them??!!

    • @nothingbutstatic
      @nothingbutstatic 23 дня назад

      You don't. Not unless you're playing in a tournament where they're banned.

  • @guyyoung4388
    @guyyoung4388 25 дней назад +58

    I want to see the sales records of everyone who banned them

    • @groundswelllegitcoffeeandb3810
      @groundswelllegitcoffeeandb3810 25 дней назад +4

      Oooh! Spicy!!!! Yikes 😮

    • @D00ML0RD1
      @D00ML0RD1 25 дней назад +3

      purches records to

    • @jproductions7469
      @jproductions7469 25 дней назад +7

      They definitely were moving their stock. All 3 of these were on the game knights episode a month back of cards they were taking out of all their decks. I wonder why. Who’s to say this hasn’t been months in the works as the CRC and their friends quietly sold their stocks in these cards before the ban

    • @thecolonel1457
      @thecolonel1457 25 дней назад +5

      ​@jproductions7469 So were they quietly selling them off or putting it on RUclips for all to see? Kinda gotta pick one there

    • @D00ML0RD1
      @D00ML0RD1 25 дней назад +5

      @@thecolonel1457 command zone arnt on the rc. but are freinds with them in there talk about removing them they talked more about they wanted to slow there decks down but nothing about power level or the cards be at risk given the sheer cost of some cmd staples they should be put onba watch list first not out right ban. this is gonna fo to way 1 players are gonna outright complain about the rc to wizards untill wizards dose something or wizards themselves are going to do something cuase the new RC hitting cards for power level meaning all the chase cards wizards like to put in packs to sell them are at risk of becomeing basically worthless. and wotc has stated multi times commanders there cash cow format and alot of cards are being made for cmd even in sets not cmd related. rember the rc might not be run by eizards but it exists becuase they let it

  • @hilal5718
    @hilal5718 25 дней назад +4

    I can understand the ban of mana crypt, it’s probably the best mana rock and fast mana
    But for me jeweled lotus makes no sense, it’s only playable in commander and they banned it… so this card is literally just a piece of paper now… also these 2 cards are extremely popular and expensive, people are trying to get them all the time. So it means that players spent money on a useless card and on a card that is not as playable as before… I don’t feel like it’s fair
    Specially that usually cards that are banned in commander are not banned because they are strong but because they are annoying or game breakers
    Commander is a game where people want to do huge plays and play powerful cards if they start to ban cards just because they are strong it means the format is gonna die
    I really hope they go back on their decision, at least on jeweled lotus

  • @Francisluther-p3x
    @Francisluther-p3x 25 дней назад +1

    I lost $400 because of this ban. I understand people hated these cards but that's still rough

    • @nothingbutstatic
      @nothingbutstatic 23 дня назад

      No, you spent $400 on 3 cards that never should have cost that much in the first place.

    • @Francisluther-p3x
      @Francisluther-p3x 23 дня назад +1

      @@nothingbutstatic you're not wrong. Still feels bad.

  • @JayCalkins-lj6it
    @JayCalkins-lj6it 25 дней назад +2

    My biggest concern with the ban is that it may be an attempt to get more people into the format. Which is cool, more power to those who join the format because they can suddenly afford to play. But this concerns me is the fact that they may end up turning a lot of CEDH players away from the format because the suddenly can't play the game. Commander is a long game format. If you get rid of fast mana, you make the game longer and not everyone has that kind of time.

    • @nothingbutstatic
      @nothingbutstatic 23 дня назад

      It's not likely to have a ton of impact on the median length of a game though, as there are still plenty of ways to ramp mana once the game gets going. The point of the bans was more to prevent the really short games where one player gets off to such a fast start the game is over before the other players really have a chance to do anything. And, if you don't have time for a longer game, you can always play a shorter format. It's not like you always have to stick to the same format.

  • @thatmtgnerd
    @thatmtgnerd 25 дней назад +2

    Great for casusl, bad for cedh. Split the format. Cedh is the last place for high octane games without dropping a cool 1,000-1,300 bucks. Since its unsantioned proxies are okay. Cedh is the only way for some people to play the game how they want.

  • @bayareafitness8436
    @bayareafitness8436 25 дней назад +2

    I don't own any of those cards but the principle irks my soul that they re release lotus and mana crypt jack up the collector booster packs hype the sets up people crazy buy to pull those cards just to get banned a year later Makes sense

  • @MattCorrales
    @MattCorrales 25 дней назад +7

    I have zero confidence in wotc right now. Especially if the rumors that they were warned as much as a year ago that it was in the pipeline and they made the three it their chase rares multiple times. Shady af. Real people are getting hosed here, and some assholes online seem to forget that too. Why would I spend a single cent right now?

  • @kapiatgatas
    @kapiatgatas 25 дней назад +3

    WOTC and the committee are probably conniving. Jewel Lotus was a chase card in expensive Collector box. So was Mana Crypt. After every lucky few who got one, flash it in their EDH and fun playing it. Or just excited it's in the 99. Then what! Why do we even follow em.

    • @asmodean7239
      @asmodean7239 25 дней назад +1

      I stopped doing that.

    • @kapiatgatas
      @kapiatgatas 25 дней назад

      @@asmodean7239 It's been nearly 2 years since I stop buying collector boxes. But I buy bundles boxes. I can use the box and dice. Sometimes I get lucky. The new Mana Crypt from Ixalan? I got it from the bundle. Jeweled Lotus, I got it from the first printing Commander Legends. Which I spent more than $5K and to have Hullbreacher banned.

    • @Mississippi_Jack
      @Mississippi_Jack 23 дня назад

      I doubt they are conniving. The committee just made Wizards look like a bunch of chumps by tanking consumer confidence and destroying the ability to reprint three huge chase cash cows.

  • @ekolimitsLIVE
    @ekolimitsLIVE 25 дней назад +11

    I’m getting rid of my cEDH decks. What’s the point of putting together the top most synergies if a ban is around the corner.

    • @MattCorrales
      @MattCorrales 25 дней назад +3

      That’s the rub. Like why would I trust Cradle and my reserve list cards aren’t coming for a ban next?

    • @MattCorrales
      @MattCorrales 25 дней назад +2

      And I love Cedh or high level casual. But the larger symbol of a “fuck you” from the RC stings unless wotc steps in shortly.

    • @thetruthisoutthere8714
      @thetruthisoutthere8714 25 дней назад

      ​@@MattCorrales WotC won't, unless they want to admit they have actual control of the format.

    • @kainslance
      @kainslance 25 дней назад +3

      Because Cedh was never meant to be a thing. Edh was a casual format for judges to do in down time at grand prixs. Go play legacy or modern if you want to spike out

    • @thatmtgnerd
      @thatmtgnerd 25 дней назад

      ​@@kainslanceas a modern and legacy player those formats are nothing like cedh. They are 60 card, 1v1, massive ban list, no commanders, and PROXIES ARE NOT ALLOWED unlike cedh tourneys. Cause their not sanctioned. A cedh deck can be built for whatever paper costs and be run. The average modern deck is 1,000 dollars.

  • @cringusmoss9937
    @cringusmoss9937 24 дня назад +1

    Hot take: No magic card should be worth more than 15 bucks. People with deep pockets are butt hurt they can't buy their way to unfun magic games. Seethe

  • @deelight6022
    @deelight6022 25 дней назад +1

    I've been told time and time again not to treat high value cards as investments but losing crypt was rough while their logic would ban basically every other good mana source. Either way I'm doing proxies full time now.

  • @Celadil
    @Celadil 25 дней назад +2

    It feels scummy for sure given they were reprinted lately. I started proxying everything expensive a while ago and still never put crypt or lotus in any of my decks so it doesnt effect me, but I think they were fine for high power pods

  • @theonlyenicfanever5346
    @theonlyenicfanever5346 25 дней назад +2

    On CardMarket, someone sold 20 mana crypts at 1 euro a piece

  • @subpump2823
    @subpump2823 25 дней назад +3

    I'm out. Im done playing for a while bc of this and 100% not going to collect bc why would you. Next is the one ring bc it makes the game go fast 🤣

  • @bewbunyon1
    @bewbunyon1 25 дней назад +1

    I could see playgroups and shops decide on how to handle the bans. But ultimately it wont save anyone who lost money [including the shops stuck with inventory]. How will THIS effect how shops order new product? If they order less, they sell less. They still have to pay the bills. The next 3-6 months could be the worst we have ever seen for our LGS's.

  • @X_Woods
    @X_Woods 25 дней назад +8

    Idc. I play EDH, not commander. The entire ethos of the format was to play cool cards in a unique way. I'mma do just that.

  • @e6staffsargeify
    @e6staffsargeify 24 дня назад +1

    And now mana vault is up a lot now

  • @Eldritch_Panda31
    @Eldritch_Panda31 25 дней назад +15

    My group is ignoring this ban announcement. We agreed nadu should only be in the 99. They also had cypts and dockside so we just agreed to keep playing them. The mana crypt announcement really angered me. Im also angry with thoracle dodging a ban.

    • @TrixyTrixter
      @TrixyTrixter 25 дней назад +2

      Thoracle Dodges the ban because one of the RC people loves playing it.

    • @gn0s1s
      @gn0s1s 24 дня назад +1

      @@TrixyTrixter right, demonic consultation thoracle super fun 2 win for edh, because vault, petal, LED, etc are all still legal. Good thing jeweled lotus banned, it totally enabled thoracle combo :/

    • @TrixyTrixter
      @TrixyTrixter 24 дня назад +2

      @@gn0s1s Totally enabled the most toxic stuff. Totally

  • @kurentas
    @kurentas 25 дней назад +16

    I don't own any of these cards but feel for anyone who does.
    They have destroyed the base of this tcg, the trust in a card's value. Why should I spent 300+ bucks for a display if I can't be sure of the lasting worth? Then it's all cardboard in the end.

    • @sablesalt
      @sablesalt 25 дней назад

      I bought a crypt for what would be 400 in todays money and don't care tbh, cards are simply game pieces and whether it gets banned or played it's money burnt effectively until sold.
      I own a couple hundred worth of reserve list cards and wouldn't be upset if they literally got reprinted or functional reprints even, frankly I would prefer if the reserve list cards were banned in commander by the RC and WotC then mass printed replacements that had an extra rules text line to mmak them only functional in commander.
      Economics aside I think the bans were perfectly reasonable as it's not ideal to have vintage strength fast mana in a format without vintage strength interaction.
      I do however feel bad for the folk that like to disassemble or sell cards to get new cards etc. as they are the group most affected by the financial loss.

    • @darkperihellion
      @darkperihellion 25 дней назад

      Yup and Jeweled Lotus is ONLY usable in commander since it gives 3 mana to cast your commander ONLY. What a freaking joke the committee is. They should be banned from future decisions, they are a shame to the community that support this format.

    • @willik257
      @willik257 24 дня назад +2

      dont expect any vallue then if its a hobby

    • @Skylos
      @Skylos 24 дня назад +2

      Bruh it was always just cardboard lol

    • @pr0fess0rbadass
      @pr0fess0rbadass 24 дня назад

      Your last sentence says it all. It's YOUR fault. If you spend hundreds of dollars on a card game made for ages 13+ and then cry when they lose value, I have no sympathy for you 😂

  • @CosmicDreamOfficial
    @CosmicDreamOfficial 25 дней назад +2

    Banning jeweled lotus but keeping sol ring is smooth brain energy.

  • @darthdab57
    @darthdab57 24 дня назад +1

    probably a hot take but if you are into magic just for the money you are aprt of the problem these are cards guys they should never cost that much.

  • @natestrasburg
    @natestrasburg 25 дней назад +3

    You should show what they cost before the ban. 😂

  • @oggrayzee5140
    @oggrayzee5140 25 дней назад +12

    Proxying every single card from now on. The way WOTC and the RC handled this was egregious. Especially considering how they dumped the rest of their dead stock (Commander Masters and Lost Caverns of Ixalan Collector packs) on the people who bought Festival In a Box 2 (I was one of them). Extremely dissatisfied with this overall and will no longer buy any official product from WOTC.

    • @SirForcEdge
      @SirForcEdge 23 дня назад

      They also knew about the banning a year ago but made the RC hold off to sell boxes of ixilan and commander masters

  • @Stormy2021x
    @Stormy2021x 25 дней назад +1

    This ban is so dumb

  • @CenJohan
    @CenJohan 25 дней назад

    Jeweled Lotus will be an interesting case study over the next few months. A card that was over $90 that suddenly has no official utility outside of individual play groups. Assuming there isn’t a major move to have Cedh get major community recognition as its own format, the Lotus can help us better understand the power of price memory and speculation on cards. Its utility is less than that of a random bulk bin card but it’s still $50 right now. Who knows how it will play out in the long run.

  • @ashekunz3100
    @ashekunz3100 25 дней назад +1

    I'm really sad to see Mana Crypt go, i loved that card. So many good memories with the 3 damage filp over the year. The other idc really all that much about. R.I.P. the Crypt 😔

  • @CokaShimoda
    @CokaShimoda 25 дней назад +19

    Complete betrayal of consumer confidence. PROXY YOUR CARDS!

    • @darkperihellion
      @darkperihellion 25 дней назад +1

      That's what I'm doing with both pods I'm playing with. We proxy every cards that cost more than 30$ for that particular reason. We don't wanna spend mortgage kind of money on a GAME meant to play with friends.

    • @117JuanM
      @117JuanM 25 дней назад

      betrayal for resellers :v

    • @Implicit_Truth
      @Implicit_Truth 24 дня назад

      What would lead consumers to be confident prior to the ban? The card market is incredibly volatile.

    • @dawubber6676
      @dawubber6676 24 дня назад +4

      It's my personal opinion that the primary function of the Rules Committee isn't to protect the value of a financial investment, but to set a baseline for strangers playing outside of a dedicated playgroup.

    • @Implicit_Truth
      @Implicit_Truth 24 дня назад +1

      @@dawubber6676 Absolutely right. Rule 0 covers everything with friends, but bans ensure that gameplay with strangers is more enjoyable. Bans target good cards, and good cards are often expensive. If they start thinking about the "market" and other irrelevant factors, they'll never take action even when it's right.

  • @brodymorales3520
    @brodymorales3520 25 дней назад +1

    As someone who spends thousands a year in will be buying maybe a few hundred and proxy anything over 20

  • @madamthulhu7856
    @madamthulhu7856 25 дней назад +1

    these bans don't matter because commander is a social format that inherently doesn't have an actual ban list the ban list serves as guidelines or suggestions for how to do a ban list amongst your playgroup. rule 0 people

    • @shoople46
      @shoople46 25 дней назад

      The same can be said for not banning them. It does matter to the people to actually own the cards or play CEDH.

    • @sablesalt
      @sablesalt 25 дней назад

      ​@@shoople46 as a cedh player this is a entirely fine ban and far from a problem, it's frankly like any other format banning unhealthy fast enablers.

  • @scottvisscher5104
    @scottvisscher5104 25 дней назад +2

    Magic will be fine, however I think collecting is dead. Why would you chase ultra rare chase cards and goofy variants when they will just get banned anyway?

    • @genericnameinc
      @genericnameinc 24 дня назад +1

      which is good. the collecting aspect was always stupid and let to an immensely overpriced secondary market for something that should just be a game.
      edit: I mean collecting itself will also be fine. if you like a card for e.g. it's art and just want to be able to look at it, you can also still always do that. just the treating of magic cards like speculation items on an unofficial stock market has been hit a bit, but even that is fine (as much as I hate people that trade cards for that reason, it's simply one volatile price fluctuation. something that can always happen and will have been part of initial risk/reward calculations for any good trader anyway).

    • @nothingbutstatic
      @nothingbutstatic 23 дня назад

      Was anyone really "collecting" jeweled lotus? If you were speculating on it as an investment and got caught in a losing position, that was just greedy and dumb.

  • @necrosisofphilosophy5247
    @necrosisofphilosophy5247 25 дней назад +1

    Mana vault shooting way up in price now, two days ago it was about 50 bucks i just checked tcg player its at 149 now

  • @1979timdog
    @1979timdog 25 дней назад +4

    Wizard has to be pissed. The rules committee literally just destroyed 3 of their biggest chase cards for future sets.

    • @darkperihellion
      @darkperihellion 25 дней назад +1

      The rules committee are a bunch of clowns. They don't even play competitive and they decide what to ban? wtf is that joke? Plus they've banned a cards that was ONLY usable in Commander and now it's a piece of cardboard only good to make filters for joints, loll

  • @barryb.benson3370
    @barryb.benson3370 25 дней назад +1

    Coming from someone that owns and ran copies of Dockside, JL and Crypt, people have to remember its a cardboard board game. Start treating it like one. The wannabe finance bros that hyperfixate on prices and treat this like a speculative market ruin the hobby. They've done this to other hobbies like retro gaming and the Pokemon TCG too. Its absurd.

    • @RegisJim
      @RegisJim 22 дня назад

      dude, why everybody pretends it hit the finance bros? in fact those guys just shrug their shoulders, cut the losses and continue making money from selling fetchlands and thoughtseizes. the ban hit Timmy who saved allowance money to purchase his own JLo that's unplayable in any format now.

  • @paizleyramsey1776
    @paizleyramsey1776 25 дней назад +4

    We will not comply. Rule zero > RC
    The RC is arbitrary. Rule Zero gang.
    The RC has no authority. Stop complying
    RC= Recommendation Committee

    • @sablesalt
      @sablesalt 25 дней назад

      While the RC's rules are actually optional be official rules since those are just the rules pdf document and oracle, that still means the banlist exists. Hey though you can legally use wish effects however which is something interesting and there is even a unique ruling for how they work that normally goes unused.
      903.11. If a player is allowed to bring a card from outside the game into a Commander game, that
      player can’t bring a card into the game this way if it has the same name as a card that player had in
      their starting deck, if it has the same name as a card that the player owns in the current game, or if
      any color in its color identity isn’t in the color identity of the player’s commander.
      Pretty interesting ain't it?

    • @shutupandlisten1075
      @shutupandlisten1075 24 дня назад +1

      Rule Zero- I didn’t want to play with people playing these cards anyways

  • @doorhouse495
    @doorhouse495 25 дней назад +2

    Im glad about the dockside and mana crypt but jeweled lotus makes no sense when the card was made for commander

    • @Matt-qp1ek
      @Matt-qp1ek 25 дней назад +4

      Wasn’t Dockside’s original printing in a Commander precon? The True-Name Nemesis argument can be made or that treasure wasn’t as supported at the time but it’s just embarrassing that cards in Commander products keep getting banned to join Hullbreacher

    • @metalthrashingnerdpodcast9864
      @metalthrashingnerdpodcast9864 25 дней назад +4

      ​@@Matt-qp1ekcommander/edh was built on playing cards and creating decks from what was made for standard. It's no surprise a rules committee for a casual format would ban cards that emulates the effect of an already banned card.

    • @Muchomexicano1
      @Muchomexicano1 25 дней назад +3

      Hullbreacher was also banned from the commander set, Nadu was designed with commander in mind, WOTC sucks at designing cards for commander, and these cards should have never been printed in the first place

    • @Matt-qp1ek
      @Matt-qp1ek 24 дня назад

      @@metalthrashingnerdpodcast9864 Dockside doesn't shut off the draw like Hullbreacher does, I think Leovold is a much more accurate comparison for Hullbreacher... Considering Hullbreacher was printed 3.5 years after Leovold was banned and then banned 7 months after it came out for the exact same reason Leovold was is just more proof of them pushing cards for profits and letting the rules committee take the fall for their bad card design choices.

  • @Mr_Emoticon
    @Mr_Emoticon 25 дней назад +7

    I was saving my mana crypt to maybe pay a bit for a new graphics card to play Space Marine 2 or a collector box of Duskmourn but instead I think I'm gonna be done with playing and buying magic for a bit. And after Hasbro being scummy with D&D I've lost even more faith they actually give a shit about the customer.

  • @TakeMeToHonkerBurger
    @TakeMeToHonkerBurger 24 дня назад

    I’m fine with it, we had a huge problem at the lgs with new players proxying all these cards in every deck. The store even got reported to wizards for allowing proxies.
    I think this is healthy, people are just upset that they have to be creative again.

  • @fishinfrenzy3503
    @fishinfrenzy3503 23 дня назад

    I just checked my store here in Canada. Mana Crypt is at $350 - $480 depending on the Art??? Other than Kaladesh at $800. 🤒

  • @darkbreaker9767
    @darkbreaker9767 25 дней назад +16

    People complaining about these bans need to grow up. These are cards that should've been banned a *long* time ago, especially Dockside and Mana Crypt. Not to mention, Commander is meant to be a format where you're supposed to be creative. Stop putting the same cards in *every* deck you build, people. That goes against the entire point of Commander.

    • @noxvenari5002
      @noxvenari5002 25 дней назад +1

      I agree with making different decks. More of a people problem.

    • @kainslance
      @kainslance 25 дней назад +1

      These people don't think for themselves and just download the most spikiest decks to go to there lgs to win a few packs.
      I highly doubt that the vast majority of people crying in comments don't own the cards

    • @jediabaja6602
      @jediabaja6602 25 дней назад

      I think the “creativity” of this game has left with the advent of the internet. I would play a different game if you’re looking to be creative.

    • @sablesalt
      @sablesalt 25 дней назад

      ​@@jediabaja6602 there is plenty of creativity in the game to appreciate mate, you are just jaded

  • @nathanieldewalt1707
    @nathanieldewalt1707 24 дня назад

    From a play perspective, these bans make sense. Being that the RC is not to acknowledge the secondary market, these bans make sense.

  • @grandmasterdrew63
    @grandmasterdrew63 24 дня назад

    I respect and appreciate what the rules committee has done to keep up the format. That being said everyone I know is ignoring the ban. All this means is that you can pick up some quality cards on the cheap. Thanks again CRC :)

  • @jamesfilyawDigginGabe
    @jamesfilyawDigginGabe 22 дня назад

    Price should not inform bans. The prices of these should not be something we observe going forward. If a card is a problem in a format, I don't care how much you're losing out on. This is a game first. It is not an investment portfolio. Its a game, not stocks, and any game piece is subject to bannings at any time.

  • @caddchambers950
    @caddchambers950 25 дней назад +5

    Commander was supposed to be ALL the cards . And should have remained that way.

    • @asmodean7239
      @asmodean7239 25 дней назад +1

      Exactly. It is our format and every pot decides for themselves!

    • @haltone3249
      @haltone3249 25 дней назад

      They either needed to ban 20 cards or unban 20 cards. They chose the path of the former but ita not enough. As long as thoricle is in the game CRC is unforgivable. (I like the fast mana bans and wish solring was banned too)

    • @haltone3249
      @haltone3249 25 дней назад +1

      I also would have been happy if most of the banlist was unbanned

  • @Npocommander
    @Npocommander 25 дней назад +2

    Commander isn't about how fast you can win it's about playing big janky spells and spending time with friends

    • @shoople46
      @shoople46 25 дней назад +1

      What if a person does want to play an optimized game of edh? Maybe that's what your friend group plays, but personally I like the actual format, but the waiting kills me. There also is a lot less interaction in edh. In a casual edh game, it sorta feels like 4 players are playing their own games, and the winner is decided by whoever gets the best card out first.

    • @Npocommander
      @Npocommander 25 дней назад

      @@shoople46 you mean cedh

    • @Npocommander
      @Npocommander 25 дней назад

      @@shoople46 if you playing to always win and not just play you are cedh

    • @TrixyTrixter
      @TrixyTrixter 25 дней назад

      @@Npocommander If you don't play to win why are you even playing? Its a game where the point is to still win.

    • @Npocommander
      @Npocommander 25 дней назад

      @@TrixyTrixter no it's so your deck does something cool like make ten blightsteels and then die

  • @otakurooney
    @otakurooney 23 дня назад

    There will be color-specific ramp, other mana rocks, and mana dorks that absorbs the demand of these cards

  • @Mando03
    @Mando03 23 дня назад

    Unfortunately it seems like this will slowly dhut out CEDH players because no one in the RC or Casual community can rule 0 properly to avoid seeing these cards in play. There needs to be a seperate ban list and RC for CEDH players and TEDH players

  • @colinmcnamee6612
    @colinmcnamee6612 24 дня назад

    I opened an ixalan mana crypt and it was one of my favorite pulls of all time and I’m excited to see how formats like cedh adapt but personally it sucks for me losing 400$ across dockside mana crypt and jeweled lotus

  • @eatit8262
    @eatit8262 25 дней назад +17

    So many tears lmao. These bans, particularly of Dockside, needed to happen a long time ago. In the case of Jeweled Lotus, it never should have been printed in the first place. Bans are a fact of card games and if you can't handle it, then stop treating the hobby I love as an investment scheme. Don't let that door slap your ass as you leave, but please stay gone.

    • @nicholasredfearn1274
      @nicholasredfearn1274 25 дней назад

      Tell me you proxie (aka pirate) without telling me you proxie lol. Was never about it being an investment scheme, it's about the big kick in the nuts it was to spend hard earned money on game peices that some random fucks in a room said I couldn't play anymore and now all that money and effort feels wasted at best, ripped from my arms like my first born child at worst. The investment was my time/energy/emotions.....money being the least important. I can make more money, I can't get my give a fucks back....who were these assholes to take that from me....fuck the CRC, rot in hell

    • @replacement6386
      @replacement6386 25 дней назад

      The issue isn't just people treating it like an investment. It's that WoTC knew this was coming and used 2 of them as chase cards in sets for collector boosters. Even if you believe that the only knew recently, they just sold a secret lair bundle using these 2 cards as chases in the collector boosters used to push the product. They literally dumped their stock.

    • @eatit8262
      @eatit8262 25 дней назад

      @@replacement6386 Sets are planned out far in advance. There have been times in the past where a ban happens to card that gets printed afterward, but it was extremely rare. With the ridiculous printing schedule WotC is on now, I expect the frequency to go up if they are also doing thier job and banning stuff that needs to be banned. What happened instead of necessary bans not happening for the exact reason you said here. It's clear bans needed to happen wand where the real problem lies.

    • @sablesalt
      @sablesalt 25 дней назад

      ​@@replacement6386WotC and the RC are different entities altogether and neither really knows what the other is doing beforehand, WotC does just reprint certain cards as generic chase cards in sets however and it's been that way for a long time such as amonket or kaladesh

  • @alejandroaldape8369
    @alejandroaldape8369 24 дня назад +1

    I didn't ask for a commander advisory group to be formed so they can ban cards when they get tired of playing with them. Or come up with stupid rules when i started playing magic you could only block one creature attacking you with only two blockers now you can use 200 token creatures to block said attacking creature now.

  • @Strawb_milk5
    @Strawb_milk5 24 дня назад

    I think on point 7 you got it backwards. I think people push a bit more towards the more expensive cards being ban when they start to approach staples.

  • @augustobs24
    @augustobs24 25 дней назад

    Limiting the amount of fast mana players can slot in their decks, and leaving the ones that are more restricted/conditional pieces of fast mana encourages build variety more than hinders commander play.
    Also, dockside was always just a dumb, exploitable treasure dispenser. People outside of cEDH saying their decks got “nuked” because the goblin was banned are abysmal deckbuilders.