So close to perfect - Ultimate Guard Return to Earth Boulder 133+ Review

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 3 ноя 2024

Комментарии • 16

  • @DrJambonius
    @DrJambonius Год назад +3

    I 100% like the concept. The country its made in, the material used and the environment concept in general make it a very good start for that kind of product.
    Now I hope they expand this series and make small adjustments to it in the future, I will be a future buyer if they can overcome the small inconvenient details (Height of box and safety of oppening).
    As usal, good video!

    • @DoubleSleeved
      @DoubleSleeved  Год назад +1

      You and us both! It is so close to greatness. A few tweaks would change everything! Hopefully they do change things 🤞🤞
      Thank you for your support ☺️

  • @Scrimshaw_DuBois42
    @Scrimshaw_DuBois42 Год назад +4

    Given only the options of exactly 100 double-sleeved or or 133 double-sleeved, I will almost always choose 133+, because I can't think of any Commander deck I have or plan to build at some point that doesn't use tokens, and you can even fit "sideboard" cards for when you want to try different cards or think you need to adjust the power level for the group you're playing with. The extra space also means it's much easier to get the cards in and out of the box.

    • @DoubleSleeved
      @DoubleSleeved  Год назад +2

      All very good points. I think many people will be in the same boat!

  • @KennyNiii
    @KennyNiii 6 месяцев назад

    Thanks for showing the shake test. Exactly the information that I was looking for. It would be great to know alternatives to consider (133+).

  • @nathan135
    @nathan135 Год назад +2

    I wish Boulders were a mm taller as well. Dragonshield art matte sleeves are slightly too tall for a conventional boulder - the Ultimate Guard logo is proud of the inner surface and presses down on the ends of the sleeves. Normal Dargonshield mattes fit perfectly though. I wish the Boulder 100s were a mm wider as well so they could actually accommodate 100 double-sleeved cards.

    • @DoubleSleeved
      @DoubleSleeved  Год назад

      All very valid and frustrating. I understand why UG wouldn't want to accommodate DS sleeves but it feels like a marginal change makes a huge difference.

    • @mistermastermind528
      @mistermastermind528 Год назад +1

      Yeah. Something like the dimensions of the UG Monolith without the dice compartment.

  • @ViXoZuDo
    @ViXoZuDo Год назад +1

    I would like to see in the reviews if the new deckboxes fit inside the arkhive, onmihive, dungeon, etc... Please, take that into consideration for future reviews.

    • @DoubleSleeved
      @DoubleSleeved  Год назад

      This is a good point. Something we do answer questions on from time to time. We need to make sure we have access to all of these as currently we only have a few but it's a great point, thank you! 😊

  • @DanielJones-hz3gj
    @DanielJones-hz3gj Год назад +1

    I almost love it but that security needs to be alittle bit better for me. Great review though.

    • @DoubleSleeved
      @DoubleSleeved  Год назад +1

      We have the same opinion! Just wish they copied the same nub size 😩

  • @ericlucas6828
    @ericlucas6828 8 месяцев назад +1

    If they combined their “solid” and 133+, it would be about perfect

    • @DoubleSleeved
      @DoubleSleeved  8 месяцев назад

      I think you're about right! ,😅👍

  • @vgpatman9728
    @vgpatman9728 Год назад +4

    I’m not a fan of the return to earth cuz they cost more and are worse quality. Like each one I have bought has had a weird inner curl which makes opening and closing the box a pain

    • @DoubleSleeved
      @DoubleSleeved  Год назад

      I've heard about the curvy sides but didn't notice it with the ones we looked at. Possibly they have remedied that or it is an inconsistent issue. But increased cost is worth mentioning. Not sure 133+ comes in non-return to earth either 🫤