😇यहां IPC की सारी वीडियोस मिलेंगी👇👇👇👇 INDIAN PENAL CODE 1860 LECTURES FOR LLB LLM PCSJ: ruclips.net/p/PLIj2toeLd48AqP1lF-js7ptuRGVTkA6Ok 💰📒For purchasing Evidence video lecture notes S17 to 167, mail me here : znt70600@gmail.com Price : 100 Rs / only यहां Evidence की सारी वीडियोस मिलेंगी👇👇👇👇 😇playlist Watch "INDIAN EVIDENCE ACT by Zeenat ruclips.net/p/PLIj2toeLd48CBDhlI4_N5UliHLxKEGba5 😇Share the videos and keep supporting me. 😇 STUDY GO with Zeenat 😊Join me on telegrams. ..👉 t.me/studygowithzeenat 😊If you wanna follow me on instagram then click here 👉 instagram.com/zeenat_siddique70600/
no person can ever be convicted for the abetment if the person allegedly responsible for the offence committed has been acquitted because the measure of guilt of abettors depends upon the nature of the act committed and the manner in which it was executed.
And 1st ka answer h Nai A ko convict nai kiya jayega uski wjh sy he crime hua h Agr wo Abet nai krta to nai hota crime Usnay kiya abet esliye hua A ko Abet nai kiya jayega ✨ By the way thnk u so much ma'am
In the illustration of abetment by conspiracy(thieves) if the servant neither open the door nor did the robbers come. Will the servant be liable under 120B? As in case of criminal conspiracy commission of act is not necessary
General advice is not abetment ( there must be active suggestion ) . 2. here the intention of A is to cause death of ' C ' it may be done with B or c or anyone. So ,here the act was done , in furtherance of abetment by A .so , A is liable for that act.
Ans....When we abet a person of unsound mind and a child below age 7, he may get acquitted but we get the punishment for that offence. If this is the case then A may subjected to punishment.
Last ans. Y & A both of them is liable bez A have guilty intention to abet B & bit letter revived by Y but y did according to that letter so both of these r liable
Ma'am 2nd m liable nai h kyu ki y indirect h abetment h usnay kisi pre state of mind sy ok nai bola .... 3rd m wo liable h abetment k liye bhale he usnay kisi or k liye letter rkha tha wo Usko kisi or ny pda or murder kr diya Bt yha abet krny ki h Kiya kisi ko b ho Us k letter pd k abet hua esliye wo liable hoga ...
In the example of abetment by conspiracy (the servant one) If the thieves not come, the servant will not be liable under this section But Explanation 2 of Section 108 says that to constitute an offence of abetment it is not necessary that the act abtted should be committed, So how the servant is not liable?? The servant will be liable na?? Even if the offence of theft is not committed
Mam, a notice came against me from the court under CRPC 107 and I have also made a mistake in going to the court and recently my police verification is going to take place under the government job, will my government job have any effect?
1- A is lible , क्युकी वास्तविक अपराध कर्ता को किसी कारण दोष मुक्त किए जाने पर भी, दुस्प्रेरक को दंडित किया जाता है । 2 or 3rd - A is not lible क्योंकि दुष्प्रेरण, अभिव्यक्त एवं स्पष्ट होना आवश्यक है।
1 ques ka ans....... .. b bhi liable hoga coz B ko A ye inform kar ke gaya hai ki B murder karne ka Raha hai B ki knowledge me hai murder karne ki baat
😇यहां IPC की सारी वीडियोस मिलेंगी👇👇👇👇
INDIAN PENAL CODE 1860 LECTURES FOR LLB LLM PCSJ: ruclips.net/p/PLIj2toeLd48AqP1lF-js7ptuRGVTkA6Ok
💰📒For purchasing Evidence video lecture notes S17 to 167, mail me here : znt70600@gmail.com
Price : 100 Rs / only
यहां Evidence की सारी वीडियोस मिलेंगी👇👇👇👇
😇playlist Watch "INDIAN EVIDENCE ACT by Zeenat
ruclips.net/p/PLIj2toeLd48CBDhlI4_N5UliHLxKEGba5
😇Share the videos and keep supporting me.
😇 STUDY GO with Zeenat
😊Join me on telegrams. ..👉
t.me/studygowithzeenat
😊If you wanna follow me on instagram then click here 👉 instagram.com/zeenat_siddique70600/
Tq mam 😍
Mam apki fb I'd dijiye plz... Baat karni hai....
I don't use Facebook. 😂😅
Mam what's up
Mujhe evidence notes chahiye....
Honestly I want to say, for you mem
You are amazing and you teach us in very easy or systematic way
From Pakistan I salute you ma'am ❤❤❤❤ my favorite teacher ❣️❣️❣️
Thankyou man your lctr..... is wndful........
Respected Madam, Very nice video of Abetment. Thanks.
Thank you ma'am aapne bhut achha explain kiya hai .
Ek request hai , aise hi puri IPC kra deti to achha hota
no person can ever be convicted for the abetment if the person allegedly responsible for the offence committed has been acquitted because the measure of guilt of abettors depends upon the nature of the act committed and the manner in which it was executed.
Thank u so much mam🥰💞🥰
Very good teaching
Thank u mam❣️
And 1st ka answer h
Nai A ko convict nai kiya jayega uski wjh sy he crime hua h
Agr wo Abet nai krta to nai hota crime
Usnay kiya abet esliye hua
A ko Abet nai kiya jayega ✨
By the way thnk u so much ma'am
helpful...
In the illustration of abetment by conspiracy(thieves) if the servant neither open the door nor did the robbers come. Will the servant be liable under 120B? As in case of criminal conspiracy commission of act is not necessary
Mam today my exam and this video so helpful for me
A. also will be acquited ...
or it depends upon circumstances
Mem plzz aap ne jo three quedtion kiye h unke answer btaye 🙏🙏
May may praying for you help you .bless you.
Thank you
Nice mam thankyou mam
General advice is not abetment ( there must be active suggestion ) .
2. here the intention of A is to cause death of ' C ' it may be done with B or c or anyone. So ,here the act was done , in furtherance of abetment by A .so , A is liable for that act.
Bhut achcha pdate ho mem🙏
I think, In situation 1, B is not liable for abetment.
In situation 2, A is liable for abetment.
1. B is liable for abetment.
2. A is not liable for abetment.
Thanks mam 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
Your Video is very good I want to crpc important video
Ans....When we abet a person of unsound mind and a child below age 7, he may get acquitted but we get the punishment for that offence. If this is the case then A may subjected to punishment.
Mam mjhe ye smjh nhi aara hai ke theft to khd mai hi ek crime hai to uska agreement krne pr wo liable q ni hai??
Last ans. Y & A both of them is liable bez A have guilty intention to abet B & bit letter revived by Y but y did according to that letter so both of these r liable
Ma'am 2nd m liable nai h kyu ki y indirect h abetment h usnay kisi pre state of mind sy ok nai bola ....
3rd m wo liable h abetment k liye bhale he usnay kisi or k liye letter rkha tha wo
Usko kisi or ny pda or murder kr diya
Bt yha abet krny ki h
Kiya kisi ko b ho
Us k letter pd k abet hua esliye wo liable hoga ...
2) A Liable to attempt abetment
ebook k payment kis Tarah karonga ...
I belong from Pakistan 🙏
Abetment by conspiracy or criminal conspiracy smjh main nhi aaya...
In the example of abetment by conspiracy (the servant one) If the thieves not come, the servant will not be liable under this section But Explanation 2 of Section 108 says that to constitute an offence of abetment it is not necessary that the act abtted should be committed, So how the servant is not liable?? The servant will be liable na?? Even if the offence of theft is not committed
Pls anyone knows the answer of my doubt?
mam pls historical background par ek vedio or bnna de
अभी series पूरी होते ही पुरानी वीडियो को फिर से बनाया जाएगा।
Ok thanku mam
A will also acquitted because b who is committing offence has been acquitted case law is jamuna singh vs state of bihar
2 ka ans ....A liable nahi hoga coz ushne to C ko letter likha tha na ki Y ko .by mistake letter Y ko mil gaya or Y ne ja kar murder kar diya
Mam, a notice came against me from the court under CRPC 107 and I have also made a mistake in going to the court and recently my police verification is going to take place under the government job, will my government job have any effect?
1- A is lible ,
क्युकी वास्तविक अपराध कर्ता को किसी कारण दोष मुक्त किए जाने पर भी, दुस्प्रेरक को दंडित किया जाता है ।
2 or 3rd - A is not lible
क्योंकि दुष्प्रेरण, अभिव्यक्त एवं स्पष्ट होना आवश्यक है।
I think in 1st situation b is not liable but in situation 2nd liable for 511
First ka ans no hoga bcz usne abet nhi kya R second me liable hoga murder ke abet ke ly
TPA Notes or videos?
Abetment is substaintive law yes he ll liable
Yes liable hai .
Thanks zeenat..but where the answers is?...
I need an e-book
Mail me here znt70600@gmail.com or text me on my telegram I'd @ZeenatSiddique
Am i right or wrong tell me plz
1st ka kya hoga answer? Plz mam btaye
1;B not liable abutment
This video screen is not clear
A not liable bcz it is not fall in instigation
First question b is not liable
Second question A is liable attempt to abetment
@@vinodrajak7609 can u explain how b is not liable
2nd ans. B is watching TV & she know the guilty intention of A &still do nothing even say ok. She is also liable I think
Yes she is but not u/s 107
@@prashantjain3423 not in 107?? Then under which section?
How r u?
Good.. Thanks
1 ques ka ans....... .. b bhi liable hoga coz B ko A ye inform kar ke gaya hai ki B murder karne ka Raha hai B ki knowledge me hai murder karne ki baat
Salam hr u yar let me clear
What is your email id
Thanks Madam