Why phone SAR ratings are silly

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 1 окт 2024

Комментарии • 55

  • @emilybh6255
    @emilybh6255 Год назад +9

    The more ratings like this they have the more people might begin to think of the health impact of all of this dirty electricity caused by the phones, cell towers, wi-fi and geo-engineering/ weather engineering that works in concert with everything due to the metallic content of the aeresol sprayed during the stratospheric atmospheric spraying they admit to. It takes very little chaotic radiation caused by radiation from technology to upset our immune system. The United States, Canada and the U.K. have the LEAST SAFE allowable emission standards. The last time I checked emissions from cell towers it was 500 microwatts per sq. centimeter. (Microwave ovens evidently run at 1000 watts per square centimeter for comparison purposes.) In Europe and Asia the maximums are only 10 microwatts per square centimeter down to only one or less than one in India for example. In France they have converted all their Wi-fi internet in public libraries to wired/ethernet. People in the U.S., Canada and the U.K. are literally being cooked.

  • @andrew41980
    @andrew41980 Год назад +4

    Good morning Cletus and Scottie!!!! grabbing my coffee and sitting down to watch!🖖🏻

  • @iamfingazonelove7937
    @iamfingazonelove7937 Год назад +5

    The Invisible Rainbow by Arthur Firstenberg - I found this helpful, especially the references.

  • @lyngruen8607
    @lyngruen8607 Год назад +3

    Thank you!! Stay well and be safe 🙏 ❤️
    Texas Nana 🤠
    Psalm 91

  • @rayclay2
    @rayclay2 Год назад +5

    excellent work scotty thank you sir~!

  • @emilybh6255
    @emilybh6255 Год назад +7

    You do NOT have to have a cell phone to access your bank account. In the U.S. People can go to the bank and withdraw cash, write a check OR use a debit card and more. I use cash mostly and more people should. You'll save the merchant you buy from a transaction fee if you pay with cash. You'll also maintain your privacy if you pay with cash. There is a danger your transaction could be turned down if you use your cell phone or a credit card or debit card and allow your bank to determine whether to facilitate the transaction or turn it down. What do you do if they turn it down? With cash you never have that problem. If people knew what was good for their personal freedom and access to their own bank account they would STOP using their cell phones for shopping or purchasing anything. Use it strictly for making phone calls. Use a PC at home for the internet.

    • @elid3906
      @elid3906 Год назад +2

      💯🎯

    • @ScottiesTech
      @ScottiesTech  Год назад +3

      I agree. Unfortunately, cash is being replaced (we're allowing it to be replaced) with card transactions for everything... And then many banks require their own app to approve the transaction - like "3D Secure" and all that. It really all went into overdrive with Amazon and online purchasing of everything.

  • @StarNumbers
    @StarNumbers Год назад +5

    SAR rating is important. The process is trying to be scientific but the human body is not cooperating as it has various and beautiful shapes. The starting point of fact is that radio frequency (RF) damage to a human is not reversible. I do not care to argue and I never hold my phone to my ear. I use a headset or tilt the phone away from my ear (with speakerphone on) and listen thru the bottom speaker that's 2 in. or so away from my ear. Yes, others can hear me and I keep it short. Yes again, the radiating antennas are at the top of the phone and then the antennas are about 7 in. away. My kid must use a (wired) headset and she needs no reminding. Finally, I use a double-pocket phone cover. It is made such that one pocket covers the phone completely with conductive (RF reflecting) layer while the other covers but one side (that is between the phone and my leg) and in this position I receive calls no problem. I love this ugly cover, dry zip and all.

  • @pfunk360
    @pfunk360 Год назад +2

    Can you recommend any phone EMF pouches that might have some faraday fabric surrounding the phone and EMF stickers, if they actually work. I am in the process of researching this myself. I can never say this too much, about how your videos have helped me so much. Keep up the good work. Check your Facebook inbox.

  • @ethimself5064
    @ethimself5064 Год назад +2

    I do my Banking by Telephone/landline. Who really needs more? Needs is the key word👍

  • @clammy21
    @clammy21 Год назад +3

    Greetings Scottie

  • @runs_through_the_forest
    @runs_through_the_forest Год назад +2

    cletus looks better than ever.. lol thanks for the info Scottie!

  • @alamedavigilante
    @alamedavigilante Год назад +2

    There's a huge difference between ionizing and non-ionizing radiation. In general, ionizing radiation is dangerous (damages DNA, may cause tumors) but non-ionizing radiation just provides visible light and/or heat; not so dangerous b/c you can see and/or feel light and heat and remove yourself from the situation if it becomes too intense. These days, too many people lump all radiation into the same risk basket.

    • @ScottiesTech
      @ScottiesTech  Год назад +2

      Start here: ruclips.net/video/h-qzqOhDc_0/видео.html
      It seems it's nowhere near that simple...

    • @DanaAshlie
      @DanaAshlie 3 месяца назад

      you need way more education before you make broad statements of which you have zero proof or actual knowledge...once you become a magnetobiologist...let us know. or Check in with some military guys who test RF and what repercussions they can have...and you'll be slightly closer to the truth. Ignorance isn't always bliss.

  • @Ronzo777
    @Ronzo777 Год назад +2

    Such a helpful video, thank you!!!

  • @Novacasa88
    @Novacasa88 Год назад +1

    It's still useful information but not even remotely useful for determining effects on human safety conclusively. Thanks for digging into this. Really just another illustration of how corrupt the regulatory groups in the US can be. The corps took over the body.

  • @ethimself5064
    @ethimself5064 Год назад +2

    🤣 Sounds like more Batshittery. I guess the more Batshittery the better for them. Stay tuned to Scottie for some more Anti - Batshittery Protection👍👍

    • @elid3906
      @elid3906 Год назад

      BATSHITTERSY🎯 HOW FITTING‼️

    • @veeseir
      @veeseir Год назад

      how is batshittery, sir?

  • @bypinkerton892
    @bypinkerton892 Год назад +1

    As I've stated before - I have a head injury that hurt much worse & enlarged the size of Pain when using T-Mobile 5g - that only took a day to return to my Injury normal - after I turned the 5g off in the phone......
    What I didn't say was that I never put any phone to my head - I use speaker & text messages - at least 1 foot away from my head - Bluetooth is always off - wifi off - Assistant off ( but they keep popping in anyway) - no banking - As Basic as Possible.....
    The increased Pain with T-Mobile 5g was a lot - but not very bad with Verizon Wave 5g....
    Using the Same Phone - unlocked - with different sim cards in it....
    So in real use - how would the phone be rated & not the network.....

    • @bypinkerton892
      @bypinkerton892 Год назад +1

      PS.... Science is only 20% True.....
      That's according to the Scientists themselves - as they were given a Survey Rating how probable Scientists Results can be Replicated - it was about 80%
      of the Scientists that couldn't even Replicate their own much less Other's work..... So.... Don't Follow The Science.....

  • @trishfish9113
    @trishfish9113 3 месяца назад

    For me it's not complicated at all. I can't use a phone with SARS over 0.50kw, if the SARS rating is over that amount, my hands start to tingle as does my face and I get a really bad pain in my chest.
    That's why, I am still using my phone from 2018.
    New phones have dangerously high SARS levels.
    I have no understanding of why SARS levels have to be so high when you are putting the device next to your head.

  • @CJWarlock
    @CJWarlock Год назад +6

    Hi. Good work! Congrats. I think this might interest you. Have you read the paper on VGCC (Voltage Gated Calcium channels) and pulse-modulated microwaves? Turns out that a part of the band that 5G is gonna use, interferes with body cell's electric signals that control ingestion of nutrients. Long story short and simplified, exposure to 5G might cause one to starve at the cellular level, despite optimal food consumption. A mass deficiency of micronutrients is rather a gloomy vision... In the long term (few weeks - few months) it's a recipe for weak immune system and in a longer run (half a year - ca. 2 years) cancer growth. If you'd like I could send you links to certain papers and educational materials like pictures, photos etc. I can't promise speed though. :) Cheers.

    • @ScottiesTech
      @ScottiesTech  Год назад +4

      Yup! It's pretty interesting (and a bit scary)!

    • @imperialdoggo5826
      @imperialdoggo5826 Год назад +3

      Then what will visible light do to you? Because it’s about 3x more powerful than 5G.

    • @reizinhodojogo3956
      @reizinhodojogo3956 Год назад +2

      @@imperialdoggo5826 it doesnt get inside you

    • @imperialdoggo5826
      @imperialdoggo5826 Год назад

      @@reizinhodojogo3956 really? Hold a flashlight up to your fingers and look though.

    • @veeseir
      @veeseir Год назад

      @@imperialdoggo5826 its not the energy, its the target that counts.

  • @joannasuccess
    @joannasuccess Год назад +1

    I’m no engineer but I am concerned about emf influence on our biology. I saw your Shungite review thank you, it doesn’t absorb..but does gold? Gold is used in phones and is supposed to be anti radiation… could you do a video on this please?

    • @truesight91
      @truesight91 Год назад +2

      Shungite harmonizes EMF does not block or shield so adding it with shielding technology works best. Elite Noble Shungite is what you need. Copper helps too.

  • @anna_cat763
    @anna_cat763 Год назад

    Best suggestion for living in the country where you only have Wi-Fi?

  • @elid3906
    @elid3906 Год назад +3

    😱BAD ENOUGH BUT THINK WHAT IT DOES TOO THE CHILDERN😱⏰

    • @imperialdoggo5826
      @imperialdoggo5826 Год назад +2

      Absolutely nothing!

    • @elid3906
      @elid3906 Год назад

      Imperial Doggo Obviously your an IDIOT‼️

    • @imperialdoggo5826
      @imperialdoggo5826 Год назад +1

      @@elid3906 really. Well would a idiot know that visible fucking light is between 3x and 70x more powerful than this. Or that it has no noticeable damage when used properly. 3m away from a 5G transceiver and you only get around 1.3x the safe exposure to EMF. How about no trustworthy health organization able to find any danger.

    • @trishfish9113
      @trishfish9113 3 месяца назад

      Exactly! It's frightening

  • @Kathleen67.
    @Kathleen67. Год назад +3

    I don't believe it's safe. I disappointed in 2015 when I found out I couldn't switch back to an old fashioned phone line. I hate that we're stuck with cell phones, and that they are moving toward WiFi only access next.

    • @imperialdoggo5826
      @imperialdoggo5826 Год назад +1

      Well it is. There’s more proof that it is safe than there will ever be claiming it’s unsafe.

  • @xenochaosxc
    @xenochaosxc Год назад +2

    hotel rooms are awful sleeping environments. considering the cost for a night it's outrageously overpriced.

  • @TheNinjaMarmot
    @TheNinjaMarmot Год назад +5

    9:00 You're missing the point. Or course everyone is different. But you need a constant. You are not going to move the bar up and down for each individual person because each person is different. You keep the bar constant in the same position regardless. That's what the FCC admits to. It isn't them saying the SAR rating is useless.
    They give the public the reports too. They recognise that most people probably don't care about the SAR rating or what it is. So it's there to keep the manufacturers in check. So they don't go crazy.
    I think there was a study done. Though the radiation isn't ionizing, they did find that the emf radiation emitted heats up tissue. And in test animals they found it would cause lesions in the brain of some of them.
    Just bear in mind. Wifi radiation is multitudes less than cellular radiation. I think there was a recommendation not to use a phone close to your head for more than 5mins regularly. Ideally use handsfree, ear/headphones or something.

    • @imperialdoggo5826
      @imperialdoggo5826 Год назад

      Cellular networks have stronger frequencies because it’s a LR-PtMP system. But still, light is more dangerous than any cellular network.

  • @reizinhodojogo3956
    @reizinhodojogo3956 Год назад

    i got to watch this video cause i was curious about what is SAR

  • @AnonZero0
    @AnonZero0 Год назад

    *Good one--thank you!*

  • @joemachine4714
    @joemachine4714 Год назад

    SAR rating is thilly...
    Like a thilly duck 🦆