Humic Acid and Biochar Does It Work?

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 26 июн 2024
  • Have you ever wondered how humic acid, biochar, or a blend of both humic acid and biochar works in your lawn or garden? In our latest episode of SoiLab, we test these variations to see what produces the best results in a controlled environment.
    Grab a MySoil test! www.mysoiltesting.com/
    Song Copyright: BW8YOHHHTWIP55KL

Комментарии • 56

  • @Blingem14
    @Blingem14 Год назад +9

    From what I understand about biochar is it is meant to change the soil over time. Creating a living soil that can change virtually any soil into that beautiful dark soil we love to see. With humic it can be a faster “fix” but it still is not about an immediate miraculous change. It’s about creating an environment that will keep getting better over time as long as there are roots in the ground

  • @Chimonya
    @Chimonya Год назад +39

    I'd like to see an untreated vs. fertilizer vs. biochar vs. humic vs. fertilizer humic vs. fertilizer biochar vs fertilizer humic biochar. Basically is all this just the nutrients or does humic or biochar do something special even beyond what fertilizing does. Organic material clearly helps plants, but do plants with adequate nutrition benefit from humic or biochar. That's what I want to see. Humic and biochar are very expensive. It makes no sense to pay that premium if fertilizer alone can do about as much as those products in conjunction with fertilizer.

    • @joe1071
      @joe1071 10 месяцев назад

      Just bought 40lb humichar for $90, delivered to my door. It ain’t that expensive

    • @Elias-xu7uw
      @Elias-xu7uw 7 месяцев назад

      Compost contains humic acid and carbon make your own from waste. Dont waste money

    • @AmericanNuke54
      @AmericanNuke54 17 дней назад

      The best way I've heard it explained, humic and biochar add no nutrients to the soil. All they do is make it to where over time, you need to add less and less nutrients to get the same effect. Plus the biochar stays in the soil for thousands of years. Native Americans used biochar in Central America for their agriculture and if i remember correctly, they dug 20 ft deep with rich black soil.

    • @laurenperry519
      @laurenperry519 7 дней назад

      I second this-from this experiment, you could easily conclude that the biggest difference was from just adding the fertilizers after testing and not from the biochar or humic acid. Would be good to know if that is the case.

    • @miltkarr5109
      @miltkarr5109 3 дня назад

      ​@@AmericanNuke54Terra pretta is definitely not biochar. Those central American Indians were putting down crude oil substances in their gardens. Only possible explanation.

  • @mclee5081
    @mclee5081 Год назад

    Thanks for your test.

  • @thomasmiller9398
    @thomasmiller9398 11 месяцев назад

    Thanks for sharing this. There are a lot of conflicting opinions on humic acid and biochar and it's great to see this scientific approach. I watched part II already and it supports the findings of these visual observations.

  • @lawnrebel
    @lawnrebel Год назад +4

    This is a great video

    • @SoiLab
      @SoiLab  Год назад +1

      Thanks @lawnrebel! We have quite a few additional studies in the works as well!

  • @LawnNOrder
    @LawnNOrder Год назад +1

    Great Study Matt.

    • @SoiLab
      @SoiLab  Год назад +1

      Thanks @SoCalLawnNOrder! I hope you found the information helpful!

  • @TheLawnMentor
    @TheLawnMentor Год назад +11

    Very cool study, guys! I would be curious to see root mass comparisons amongst these tests

    • @SoiLab
      @SoiLab  Год назад +5

      Thanks @TheLawnMentor. This is a great idea, you may see this in a future video.

    • @TheLawnMentor
      @TheLawnMentor Год назад

      @@SoiLab let me know!

  • @dillardnorg
    @dillardnorg Месяц назад

    Thank You! Thank You! Thank You!

  • @jenniferfisher1743
    @jenniferfisher1743 Год назад +1

    I love the addition of living plants in the soil tests! Is their a test you can do to take in to account the microbial activity?

  • @richardsmith1161
    @richardsmith1161 Год назад +3

    I'd like to see worm castings added to the test, I've seen great results in my lawn/ garden.

  • @azander1958
    @azander1958 Год назад

    Very thanks guys now I'm finally decided on buying some humic acid now

  • @JetIgniter2k2
    @JetIgniter2k2 Год назад +2

    Very interesting, I might look into using biochar and humic acid in the sections of my lawn that are very poor performing. After running some soil tests first, of coarse, And that's what I love about this channel, you really dive into the science and chemistry of what's actually going on. I'm sure these tests take a long time to set up, I can't wait to see what's coming.

    • @noahjohnson08_
      @noahjohnson08_ 2 месяца назад

      Humichar is a product made for lawns

  • @johnroydelacruz1433
    @johnroydelacruz1433 Год назад

    Informative video. I hope that you can make a video about fish amino acid.

  • @jimmyriggin
    @jimmyriggin 2 месяца назад

    I just came across your channel and this video. I had to stop it at 2:38. I’m a permaculture design instructor. These soil amendments that you’re using will only show you 100% results positive or negative in living soil in a full garden environment with biological process is happening. Such as the mycelium growth and soil, moisture retention and pH balancing. If you had a full outdoor garden of a variety of plants that are all beneficial to each other using those soil amendments, you will see these things increase in size in a way that you will not imagine being such, a size. for example, if you had six fruit trees and two 4 x 8 beds and a handful of potted plants, this would give you a better test result for each of the types of plants you could grow with the soil amendments. If you only add the acid in biochar to, a soil that has no nutrients and no chance to grow any mycelium. You’re not gonna see much of a result from your bio chart. It needs food and microorganisms to complete the entire ecosystem underground. This is why your results are hitting & miss. if you take some soil samples and take them to the local so testing lab in the city, they could tell you exactly what you have going on in your test buckets. I know I have no videos to prove my point, but there’s plenty of Permaculture design videos on RUclips that discuss the full food chain of the microorganisms underground along with the entire growth cycle in process. I hope this is helpful. I meant no disrespect just an observation that I seen in this video that was not fully explained nor was it fully tested in a full capacity. Lab testing certain things is fine to see if they’re sustainable for certain plants, but you still have to have the rest of the soil biology in order to see if it actually will do as it is said to do.

  • @benjaminrodier6902
    @benjaminrodier6902 6 месяцев назад

    Hello, thanks for this video,
    what kind of light do you use ?

  • @whitepoststudio3947
    @whitepoststudio3947 2 месяца назад +1

    Good video, however I was left wondering what was it that you used to charge the bio-char in the third tray from the left ?

  • @CarlyD.
    @CarlyD. Год назад +1

    I appreciate the results. I have also added the mycorrhizal fungi to the soil for better roots. Can this influence the results when the test goes longer to show the root development? I notice that the plants are healthier with the fungi added when some of my neighbors garden is starting to suffer in the heat my keep going.

  • @Utopicfarmer
    @Utopicfarmer 4 месяца назад +1

    Make video on Biochar + Mycorrhiza.
    It is being said that Mycorrhiza houses itself in biochar instead of plant roots and it turns parasitic (instead of being symbiotic) and starts sucking nutrients from plants, leading to undesirable effects.

  • @MrHiggs89
    @MrHiggs89 Год назад

    Howdy!
    I live in the DFW North Texas area and our St. Augustine Grass has developed Take All Patch/ Take All Root Rot. this fungal disease is very hard/ almost impossible to control. Fungicides have very little affect to no affect at all. Talking with Texas A&M, they have suggested to use Sphagnum Peat Moss to lower the pH level in the soil. Because our soil is made up with mostly clay, our soil tends to be or on the alkaline side. With these soil amendments you have used, do you think it can help recover the St. Augustine quicker with less usage of Sphagnum Peat Moss?

  • @whatisthissss
    @whatisthissss Год назад +5

    What products were used :)

  • @eugenieandrews8874
    @eugenieandrews8874 Год назад +3

    Loved the idea and the information the experiment provided but shocked that the control wasn't treated with fertilizer as well. By not treating the control with fertilizer, it negated the purpose of the control. It is widely known applying fertilizer will generate a growth response. Basically, the controls became the humic acid with fertilizer and the biochar with fertilizer and the experiment changed to what affect does combining the two amendments HA and biochar have on growth and performance. It would be beneficial to repeat the experiment using fertilizer in the control.

    • @kenberian4863
      @kenberian4863 10 месяцев назад +1

      Hey SoiLab, you definitely should respond to the issue in Eugenie's comment. I re-watched the video to hear if you said you also added the fertilizer to the control. If you didn't, she is totally correct. If you did, then it's an excellent, valid experiment. Well, either I missed it or you didn't mention it either way -- very frustrating. I hope you're still reading these comments 3 mo after you posted this video, bc I sure as hell want to know that I didn't just waste my time watching an invalid experiment.

    • @timturk1899
      @timturk1899 6 месяцев назад

      After watching a few of these videos, it doesn't seem like they ever have a "Control w/fertilizer only", ever..?!🤔👍✌️

    • @ML-un1gr
      @ML-un1gr 3 месяца назад +1

      This is very true. If you are trying to ascertain if Humic and or Biochar have an effect then they should be the only things that change in each experiment. So all other things should be equal, including fertiliser. So the control must have the fertiliser that the other 3 tubs had, otherwise the experiment is invalidated, because the increased growing effects might have nothing whatsoever to do with the Humic or the Biochar and may come 100% from the fertiliser.

  • @user-kd8db8wi3t
    @user-kd8db8wi3t Год назад +3

    What product was used for charged biochar and humic acid?

  • @greengrowcer2419
    @greengrowcer2419 Год назад +3

    How did you charge the biochar?

  • @Capricorn7271
    @Capricorn7271 10 месяцев назад +1

    What is the propotion of humic acid and biochar in the mixture of these two materials you used in the experiments?

  • @kcomby78
    @kcomby78 7 месяцев назад

    When you mentioned charged biochar. How did you charge it?

  • @joseguadarrama255
    @joseguadarrama255 Год назад

    I might have missed it but is there a specific brand that you guys Used?

  • @jon_tool91
    @jon_tool91 Год назад

    How does bio char and or humic acid work in sandy soil? Will it just drain our or actually amend the soil. Thank you

  • @richardportelli1983
    @richardportelli1983 8 месяцев назад

    makes sense as humic is not a fertilizer. humic is similar to biochar as it makes nutrients available and also holds onto water and nutrients to be used as the plants need them.

  • @goodtogrow7774
    @goodtogrow7774 11 месяцев назад

    I'm using something called BioHydro but can't find any videos on it.

  • @jparks6544
    @jparks6544 6 месяцев назад

    What kind of soil did you use? It doesn't look like it has much compost in it. Should have used a control with compost as well.

  • @goldslinger
    @goldslinger 11 месяцев назад

    Humic acid and bio char is just a carbon source that work over a period of time, creating microbiological processes that make nutrients in available form to plants. Your ‘charged bio char means fertilizer added so it doesn’t retain it, so…

  • @the26local96
    @the26local96 Год назад

    Liquid Dirt video plz

  • @Lukas-ep2ow
    @Lukas-ep2ow Год назад

    Hallo

  • @OrganicGreens
    @OrganicGreens Год назад +1

    I bet most your benefit is coming from aration from the biochar here. does not look like proper potting soil so drainage is probably your weak point here. is there drainage holes?

  • @johnslugger
    @johnslugger 11 месяцев назад +1

    *The more Oxygen used to make Bio-Char the more POT-ASH is made. Potash is HIGHLY alkaline as Pot-Ash and Animal Fat is how the pioneers made Soap 150 years ago!! The Humic acid may simply be Neutralizing the Pot-Ash within the Poorly made Bio-Char. The Bio-Char machine I built uses 5800 Watts of electric power at 240VAC for 2 hours and it's totally air tight so the pH of my Bio-Char is right at Ph 7.2 (More like activated Carbon) - When I made Bio-Char the old way buy burning wood in an open flame and then smothering the glowing amber's the pH was 10.9 when mixed with water which burns the roots of most plants. I'd try mixing your bio-Char with sulfur or sulfuric acid or just make the Bio-char in a 99% anaerobic atmosphere (no air!!!) to keep the pH of the Char as neutral as posible.*

  • @CCCC-tq8yo
    @CCCC-tq8yo Год назад

    Looks like it did not work

  • @jonrottenny
    @jonrottenny 2 месяца назад

    A better test would have been adding ferts to the control. Obviously the plants/grass are going to fall short without ferts. That way you would know exactly how much the amendments are really working. This test is flawed for that reason

    • @cosmicrealm1567
      @cosmicrealm1567 2 дня назад

      That was intentional he stated it toward the very end

  • @demsandlibsareswinecancer4667
    @demsandlibsareswinecancer4667 Год назад

    How does the addition of those items affect the aeration and drainage of the soil? That may be part of your benefit.

  • @demsandlibsareswinecancer4667
    @demsandlibsareswinecancer4667 Год назад

    Worm castings?