If you buy today's gear through my affiliate links, Canon will drive the cripple hammer out to the woods and leave it there. But will it find it's way back?! Canon R7 bhpho.to/3MMkjwX Canon R10 bhpho.to/3MNStQY Instagram instagram.com/vegetablepolice/ All my gear and recommended products can be found in my affiliate shop, thanks for shopping around! www.amazon.com/shop/vegetablepolice
I always thought of the cripple hammer in your videos as sort of Thor's hammer. Will it not just fly back to the hands of Canon after it's done it crippling or when it's left in the woods (and think of all the animals it will cripple after it has been left in the woods).
I still rock a Canon 7D with Magic lantern: shooting RAW video + timelapses. I was looking forward to this R7 coming out, but I agree with you... not as impressive as I think it should be for video. And those RF-S lenses so far are crazy unappealing (at least spec wise).
You DO realize you can use any of the stellar RF lenses on this camera right? You also realize you can use any EF lens too right? lol. Only amateurs shoot crop lenses on crop cameras. Ive been shooting 18 years and Ive never used a crop lens on any crop sensor Canon.
@@michaelbell75 a compact good rf lens with constant aperture will be nice for traveling. I am very happy about the quality and portability of my m43 system. But will probably get a R7 for the autofocus and better stills capabilities. But would something small like my 12-40 mm F2.8 for the M43.
The R7 has great rolling shutter to recreate famous old-timey warpy pics! The R7 also has a loud mechanical shutter that mimics a woodpecker - great for attracting wildlife photographers in your area! The R7 also has crippled video specs so that it can't overheat! Ingenious! For real though, 32.5mp and Canon autofocus are nice. Might be a good wildlife camera if the mechanical shutter doesn't scare everything away.
‘A loud mechanical shutter that mimics a woodpecker’. Perhaps using the silent electronic shutter might be in order? Here’s another thought. Don’t buy it. Problem of your hating it, solved.
I started out with a Canon T6s. When I went full frame I switched to Nikon and bought a ditto for its low light performance. I now use a z6 ii. One of the reasons why I switched was because Canon cripples their cameras. I do like how Fuji puts everything into their next model without worrying about hiring the sells of a different model. I think Nikon may go that route this time. Imagine if Nikon makes a d750 I too replace the d500 with the same tech that's in the z9. Stacked bsi sensor, no mechanical shutter, 4k video with every option, at least 20 fps. That camera would be a beast. I'm glad Canon came out with the R7 before noon comes out with their version with similar specs. Nikon probably has the best ergonomics followed by Fuji. I haven't looked at a Panasonic yet but I'm sure theirs is good. I think Canon is getting designed by aliens with weird fingers or something.
I'm a former D750/D500 owner shooting Z's and they have lost the ergonomics award. Mostly due to firmware limitations and not saving every function to a user mode. I had the D750 first, and I felt like the D500 was an upgrade to the D750. My Z7II still doesn't have the responsiveness of my D500. I'm constantly switching an Fn button for metering or subject tracking or whatever. A menu, MyMenu, touchscreen, and buttons that just don't work as well as the physical "pro" layout (D2xx/D3xx/D5xx/D6xx/D7xx/D8xx. 85% of the photos from my Z50/Z7II combo are better than f-mount bodies. AF-C and the firmware just isn't there yet. Neither even have a 1/3 crop grid! I want a Z6II sensor with IBIS in a D750 body with D500 performance, a fully articulating screen (no FX Nikon has one,) and a pop-up warm LED flash. Had they made this f-mount 3-4 years ago they'd have owned the market IMO.
@@skyrunr you have to remember that Nikon is on their 2nd gen cameras with the z6 II and z7 II. The z9 is probably considered 3rd gen. They recently stated that the next models coming out will have some of the same technology that's in the z9. Will that be stacked sensors? Electronic shutter only? Better tracking? We don't know yet. I think all of the bodies will be back to normal size so they can dissipate heat from using them in video mode. I also believe there will be a mirrorless d500 come out with similar specs as the z9. It'll be cheaper and probably won't do 8k.
@@carlmcneill1139 Yes, I'd be happy with a few decent firmware updates. The glaZZ is unmatched, but super sharp is no good if AF-C isn't there. I want to buy them all, but the beauty of them as I only need 3-4. I don't even shoot video, but I still want an articulating screen. Mostly to flip it over and protect it, or shoot in a crowd over people's heads without disrupting someone's video behind me. A full 90 degrees down would be enough.
@@skyrunr I want a fully articulating screen for when I take landscape pictures down low in portrait orientation. I have a Canon T6s with the flip out screen like that and it works great in those situations. I really think Nikon will be putting them in soon.
I think for video the appeal of the canon r7 is the ability to use cheap ef lenses. sigma 18-35mm f1.8 on the canon r7 with the ef to rf nd adapter means you get.....10bit, IBIS, vari-ND, auto-focus and f1.8 contant aperture for a very low price. I've also seen used ef mount sigma 50-150mm f2.8 lenses for $300
@@Yupthereitism a7iii is 8bit colour, and fly by wire focus lenses (screw on nd filters). A7iii screen blacks out when using a monitor in 4k (and loses reliable autofocus). A7iii has a lot of issues for video (and expensive fly by wire lenses). Either spend more and get a sony a7siii, or go cheaper and get a used fuji xt3 (and upgrade to the fuji xh2s down the line). Edit: or use a canon r7 with the option of moving to blackmagic or canon cinema cameras (canon c200, c300 mkiii). Ef lenses are cheap and great for using manual focus when needed (while also having “ok” autofocus)
Christopher Frost always left the Canon 32.5mp APS-C sensor from the M6 mkii as the last in his lens tests. That sensor is so brutal even Pro grade EF lenses struggled to deliver. That's the biggest cripple blow.
@@PrimalShutter I know about pixel pitch. However, it isn't as easy as just saying the bigger the photo site the better the sensor. There is a lot going on between the sensor and the image you see after capture. For instance, the R5c and the R5 uses the same sensor, however the R5c gets better dynamic range. Now there is a rumor that the Digic X in the R5c is modified. But it could also be the codecs. Whatever the case, they should get the same exact DR, but they don't. There are cameras with more megapixels with smaller sensors that outshoot cameras with larger sensors and less megapixels. Now their pixel pitches are pretty close... the c70 is 6.40um while the R3 is 6.00um. The C70 with a Super35 outshoots my R3 for instance... now the R3 might be sharper, but the highlight rolloff, the dynamic range, the color depth.. ya know the stuff that matters with video, it does way better on. Despite the fact the C70 is a super35 sensor and the R3 is a Full-frame. However, lets walk back a moment and really think about this camera... it's a $1499 camera. First and foremost. That's cheaper than a gh5 mark II, that's cheaper than a Sony a7c. Its made for wildlife, a photography first camera. So for wildlife you would want something that can capture relatively fast, 15fps, that is very sharp, has IBIS, with lots of AF -- this $1499 camera has that,.
@@AndrewKuttor his point was that there are no lenses that can perform well enough in the center to justify an increase in megapixels. Its a demanding sensor since the mpx are centered in the center. You will have to pay thousands on glass to take advantage of this sensor or you'll just be magnifying lens and shooting errors. It's essentially a cripple.
@@burritobrosvideos8060 you are correct about the sensor being more demanding. But the corners would be the most demanding of all (If somehow the sensor was aligned to the extreme corner of the full frame).
I completely agree with the power switch on the R7 being a mistake having taken the place of the rear top command dial. They should have taken the command dial/power lever from the R10 and put it on the R7. The ergonomics of the R5 and R6 were heading in the right direction from the stupid R’s touchbar and lack of rear aperture wheel, and now this. Hopefully Canon opens up the RF mount or puts out affordable, brighter RF-s glass
On the R7 I can control all of my settings with just the front dial and the rear wheel while looking through the viewfindder in FV mode. Just my finger and thumb. Very simple!
Yeah im also super happy with the controls. Especially as someone who never had a control wheel at the back at all (only entry level APS-C DSLR and the EOS RP yet) Sometimes i really miss a control wheel but its still doable since the R7 allow pretty much any mapping on the buttons. I really tried to not like the R7, especially the R10. But the more i realized how bad the EOS RP is for wildlife and video (wasnt considered at all at purchase!) the more i began to think about getting the R7 and soon i liked it. Still the price is too high considering the flaws and missing features like 240fps video.
That isn't coming, I'm afraid. Canon have already said their R&D is focused on the RF system. They'll keep making EF-M mount gear because it sells; but they won't develop anything new for that system.
@@ericb8985 what is not pro about the R7? I used the 7Dmk2, some 5D bodies, 6D, R5, 70D, 80D, and I can not spot a huge difference beside the 7D being chunky as 5Dmk3 with the awful dynamic range of the 70D
@@dtibor5903 "Pro" usually includes top-end features. The 7D bodies were all at the top of the game when they were released and therefore offered unique advantages. The R7 has a worse viewfinder and IBIS than the other RF bodies and its sensor doesn't add any low-light performance for wildlife photography. Canon didn't try to create an ASP-C camera with their best technology and that's what doesn't make this a pro camera. Existing bodies can fully replace the R7 which wasn't quite the case for the 7D and 7D II.
About time you gave a shoutout to my Blackmagic bois. $1499 for a 90D with two lenses. Literally buy anything else. EOS R is $1499 refurbished right now.
What other APS-C camera has 4K 60p, IBIS, dual card slots, the best AF system on the market and can shoot 15fps mechanical/30 electronic? and all of it for $1,500. I'll wait....
I've been on the 90D since 2019. Basically waited for 3 years for Canon to release something like the R7. But they waited a bit too long. Switched to a GH5 Mark II a couple weeks ago and have seen the light. I could still return it and go back to Canon but I'm staying with Pany. This camera is more fun and more customizable than Canon has ever been. Also autofocus is not as bad as many say. Good bye Canon cripple hammer. Hello Gh5!
@@burritobrosvideos8060 Panasonic "We're Not As Bad As You Think!" Come see our exhibition in the rusty shack by the gator swamp, the location is not as bad as you think!
Cripple hammer? LOL! What other APS-C camera has 4K 60p, IBIS, dual card slots, the best AF system on the market and can shoot 15fps mechanical/30 electronic? and all of it for $1,500. I'll wait....
@@michaelbell75 who the fuck buys apsc anymore? The low light performance will be TRASH. Especially when the only affordable rf lenses are so SLOW. Good luck getting any non grainy pictures 🤣😂🤣
It will. This is all a bitter rant about what I don't know. All those options are stellar. You're not gonna get the same quality in a R7 that you would an R3 or R5. That's like getting an A7RIII and being upset it doesn't stack up to an A9
Here I was looking at all the early reviews of the R7 (we know, who those guys are). I was feeling the temptation to ditch my X-T4 and getting the same or better specs and that autofocus (X-T4 woes). The board meeting was absolutely fantastic. Canon mindset explained. Thanks for setting things straight for me. Lesson: Don't watch those early reviews.
2:31 - Omg YES! Finally ... Footage you found of the Cripple Hammer invading the board room to intimidate an ambitious, new Canon engineer. I knew you had this footage somewhere lol :)
One of the strengths of Canon cameras has been ergonomics. All of the prosumer and professional cameras have a predictable layout of controls, menu, and user interface that allow the photographer who uses more than one camera in the field to quickly and easily switch between cameras without missing a beat. The Canon R7 completely changed the predictable layout found on the Canon 7D Mark II, all the 5 series bodies, the 1DX series, and the new layout on the R5 and R6. While the specifications and feature set are really exciting Canon stopped short of true excellence. For example, 30 fps is great but the buffer and comparatively slow memory cards results in a frustratingly short 2-2.5 sec of continuous shooting before the camera starts buffering. For a camera that is aimed at sports and wildlife enthusiast photographers a larger buffer and/or faster storage would better meet the needs of that target market. Oversampled 4K at 24 p but not at 60 p is another example of stopping short of excellence. I wonder whether Canon has plans to produce a more professional level APS camera? That would be greatly welcomed.
Someone quickly handed me a 60D many years ago and I couldn't find the power button. I tried an EOS-R and couldn't stand a dial only being used for power. LOL I found all the little buttons difficult to reach by feel compared to Nikon as well.
Not a BSI sensor - that's a deal beaker... for what I was hoping to be a pro APSc setup, the smaller sensor should have been BSI to extract the best possible image quality. That and 240 FPS in 1080p - then I'd jump on it... but as it is, I'll pass... Long live the cripple hammer...
Please. This thing is going to easily be the best crop sensor camera on the market for the price. No one wants to pay an extra $500+ for a BSI sensor lol. Wait for the top of the line APS-C R camera which Im sure will have it. Go ahead and stupidly pay $3K for it too.
The Fuji X-S10, but you don’t always need BSI to produce great images. The Canon 7D don’t have BSI, neither does the Z5 or D500, and all 3 produce excellent image quality. With Canon’s trademarked dual pixel technology, you don’t need BSI. The R7 also gets AF II technology directly from the R3, which should get you some great shots.
You make my day, as usual. I hope to god i never weaken and buy another Canon. Not just because of this video but because i think Canon take amateur photographers for fools. It started with the EOS 650. And has gone on ever since. Now they offer not much for the enthusiast, if you want better then go for the high end stuff with stupidly priced lenses.
I have a 5d iv im thinking switching to R7 to get ibis and autofocus and some other good stuff meh i mean u could put a speed booster on it's close enough to full frame use a tamron g2 24-70 f2.8 maybe it will be 27-80 mill f2.0 equivalent with speedbooster probably its a little noisyer then full frame yeah well what do u think ? should i do it am i crazy or i don't know what im taking about here ?!
I tested the R6. Mainly photography. Perfect body. The autofocus oh my gosh. So awesome. I cried. But their lenses to dang big and heavy. That ruined it.
I am bitterly disappointed with this release . I am looking to upgrade my 7D mkii. When it was released it was a pro grade camera and pretty much the pinnacle of aps-c format. It shared the same form factor as the 5D Canon full frame pro body of the day , but had superior burst rate and flagship level auto focus . I was expecting something along the same lines for the R7 , an aps-c R5 if you like . I lost the bulk of my kit recently in a natural disaster. I am down to a 100-400 zoom and an18-55 kit lens that I never got around to selling . I no longer have the massive investment in canon glass and bodies that once kept me glued to the brand . I guess I just need to manage my expectations , but canon may have lost me .
I agree wholeheartedly with your assessment. The Canon 7D Mark II was a far more professional level camera in its day and in the overall Canon product line up than is the current Canon R7. While the new sensor is offers higher resolution, much better auto focus, and all of the benefits of a modern mirrorless camera, I feel that Canon stopped short of developing a true successor to the Canon 7D Mark II. I can only hope that there are plans to release a more professionally oriented APS camera. I, too, have a massive investment in Canon lenses and multiple bodies. So, it would be prohibitively expensive to switch to Sony or to Nikon.
@@VABrowneMDPhD I suggest you guys watch previews of guys who have actually used the camera. It's 33 meglixels, has IBIS, solid body with the R3's autofocus on tracking! For $1500, what's not to like? 4K60 is plenty. Definitely need more affordable RF lenses but it sounds good to me.
@@gregorybeale old sensor, removed dials, not weather sealed, no native lenses, poor video specs, coats as much as full frame. What’s not disappointing?
@@zegzbrutal it has great performance but I don't know how it will fare in a tropical downpour or banging against rocks while scambling across a mountainside. I am not a fan of its unique form factor . Before I lost my 6D in flooding , I would shoot with both it and my 7dmkii it was a pain in the arse switching between the two due to the different control layouts .
You forget that this is a photography camera. To Canon, video is optional x.x and if you want better video features, then you have to pay the premium for it or pay even more and go to their cinema lineup 😉
What other APS-C camera has 4K 60p, IBIS, dual card slots, the best AF system on the market and can shoot 15fps mechanical/30 electronic? and all of it for $1,500. I'll wait....
I think R7 is a good camera though it won't shoot all-I in 4k 60p, it also has no recording limit. Its autofocus is better than any Fuji camera right now. Fuji XH-2 has a really tough competition.
@@Yupthereitism I don't know man. XH 2S looks like a very good lighter BMPCC6K camera without B Raw but with still unreliable autofocus. I mean I wanted to like that camera so much but that just one thing destroys my prospects.
Canon's is trying to make up for the lackluster ef-m line. Stick with full frame Canon. If you want APS-C go Fuji or Sony. Excellent lenses from Fufjifilm and great video options from Sony.
Aerial photographer here. I currently run a 90D. I think I’m gonna try the R7. I like the sensor stab and 15/30 fps rates. The joystick/wheel thing is really strange but I’m willing to forego judgement until I use it. I’d prefer if it were physically larger. I like having some hunk to hold on to when shooting through the removed door of a fast moving copter or plane When I buy in a few weeks I’ll be sure to use your link!
I don’t think that joystick wheel is a dumb idea , my 5ds have a wheel lower down and I love it , with this I don’t have to move my thumb from the joystick to the wheel so it’s one less step . Although have to try it first to see if I like it . Sure it’s really ugly but it’s not like it’s a sexy camera to begin with
Don't buy half-arsed cameras. They are just there to rake in money for the R&D. Go for the next iteration. The R10 is over £1000 with a lens for a pretty basic camera. That's a £500 camera.
I hear rumours of new Sony apsc lenses meaning Sony have yet to abandon the APSC line. Hopefully they bring out a camera with a stacked sensor to reduce the horrible rolling shutter.
Bang on. It will be a 24MP stacked sensor video focused camera with no rolling shutter for the 'tube. It's not looking good for the Sony APS-C flagship at 32 or 40MP that I am waiting for, as Sony is probably selling those sensors to Fuj for the XH2.
yeah, I'm so disappointed with far away objects even though my lens reaches to them, they are all foggy, blurry and uninspiring. Landscape shots at max zoom are the worst, often the camera can't even focus on distant foggy mountains at all and manually it's impossible to tell whether you're in focus or it's just heat waves and fatamorgana
The one thing I thought looked good was the bird in flight tracking. Shamefully, I watched froknows preview, and he tracked Canadian geese I think through trees in a 360 degree arc, and it performed incredibly well. That is the only real selling point for these cameras, and all it is, is that digic processor. That’s it. If the X-H2/s has autofocus that is even nearly on that level then Canon is floating in the water like a stale turd when it comes to aps-c.
Watching fro is acceptable as long as you mute the audio. Then you don't have to listen to his attempts to have a "signature attitude" or whatever his excuse is.
LOL. Panasonic AF is straight garbage. You've clearly never even touched a Canon R3 much less used one. It has the best AF on the market and the same AF system is in the $1500 R7. Try again.
I use Canon M50 and I like canon colours and ease of use but I am blown away with Sony cameras specs. R7 interesting but what lens to use? F4 costs over£1500 and f2 over £3000. Who can justify that? What lenses for RUclipsrs or social media content creators?
I think it looks like a really good camera for wildlife for that price , you get ibis , some weathersealing, good ergonomics , autofocus that will blow Fuji etc out of the water , 15fps with descent buffer (slow sensor so you don’t want shoot with electronic shutter etc for 1500 dollar . How is that a hard sell ?
How is the back wheel a cripple ? Canon have had a wheel in the back for a long time this is just a new version where you domt have to move your thumb down from the joystick .No idea I’f I will prefer this from my 5ds have to try it first but I would not call it a cripple. For being crippled it has to be a option they have dumbed down .. the kit lens is stupid tough 18-45 there is barely any zoom
I have both a 90d and a M6II. For nature walks, i have a 24-105L version I with a speedbooster on the M6II and a 100-400L version I for the 90D. I have used the 100-400 on both. Either way, adapting older EF glass on both, the autofocus is way better than i would ever be able to do manually. The R7 should be a terrific autofocuser with the digic X chip and would be an awesome upgrade for the 90D to get the EVF, as the optical hit rate is only so-so. The optical view finder is a pleasure to use, but not as confident as the DPAF. I hear that the 100-400 version II works way better on the 32mp sensors than the version I i have. EF glass is cheap and plentiful and performs way better than adaptations on other systems. My 2 cents from a longtime canon fanboy.
OHH! Jarod did not say anything. I’ll stick with my Nikon Z50. Thank you!! I need my dials and I set the manual focus to ISO. Give all controls at me fingers.
I made expensive looking videos with my old XT3 that ran around other directors even using RED cameras. No one believed me lol Fuji IQ is crazy for the value. Hard to beat.
Last year I could’ve bought the entry level RED. I opted for the Fuji XT4. Best decision I ever made. Not only do I have an incredible 4K movie camera, an incredible still camera, as well.
Pre-ordered the R7. Never thought I would but i shoot with the 90D and this is at least for my need a good release. Need the AF, the Color’s and get already great results for my stuff. Do macro and regular product vids (watches..) and mainly studio with once and a while going to an exhibition. so in the end Stabe is great, image quality is good enough and better what I am getting currently out of my 90D so I will give it a try. Still a lil bit scared of the files but lets see. thanks for your thoughts, helped me to get a bit more realistic in regards of expectations but look forward to this one. Hope for new lenses end of this year, will adapt right now my ef and Efs Glas, which is OK. Cheers mate.
@@burritobrosvideos8060 It does overheat in 4K and I do macro shots in my vids. I need to be closer. Plus the Color of the R6 is not my cup of tea its a bit too orange for my taste. So nope, not for me
@@mb-watches you won't like the colors of the r7 if you don't like the r6. If you need 4k go with gh5, fuji, blackmahic which will all be better than cannon. If you need stills or lowlight performance go with fill frame.
@@burritobrosvideos8060 Fuji Panasonic and Blackmagic all have garbage AF compared to the R3s AF system. But you wouldn't know that because you are a clown who's never even seen an R3 in person much less used one.
@@burritobrosvideos8060 what I did see is that the Color’s If the R7 look close to my 90D which I like. Will give it a try, I do as well talking head and autofocus must work.
I when the crippling feature of the R7 is the low Res EVF ! Low Res back screen is ok, but tye EVF for sports and wildlife zooming at distance,..really Canon !
I am an owner of a R7 who is about to sell it with all the RF, RF-S, EF and EF-S I got to switch to Sony just because of the lack of decent RF-S lenses and superpricey RF L lenses that btw this R7 wouldn't take all the advantage from. It's a pitty, I like the R7 so much, but is all about the lenses and canon has also banned third party manufacturers. Damn, I am so mad at Canon...but you made me laugh so hard with this. God bless you.
@@TheGentooGamer ibis performs perfectly fine with the EF adaptar in my experience, not worry for that. The problem is the size, the weight, and of course that you won't take all the advantage of the RF bayonet of the R7 sensor. For me Sony + sigma lenses is the perfect choice right now.
@@ipbsoft ok, good to know. i been getting very mixed reports of ibis not working with ef lenses which is a bit worrying, not sure. id like to get a good hybrid camera (although mainly for youtube video), and yah at the price-point ($1,364.95 on walmart) the r7 has seemed pretty compelling, aside from maybe lens selection. as for weight, lighter would be nice but i already been using full frame EF lenses on my old rebel t3 so cant be that bad. every video i have seen who has given an r7 alternative has been something more expensive or something that isnt water resistant or has a 30 min record limit or smth of that nature (id like to hike with whatever i get)
I've been on the Canon APSC platform for a good while since APSC makes more sense if you're in situations where longer focal ranges are what's needed. I love my T6s but I need better video capabilities. Looking at the R7, I really fail to see why I'm supposed to invest into it over the 90D. I can find 90Ds for sale going for 900 bucks while the R7 is like 1500 bucks for the opportunity to use the same sensor and to either buy an adapter for my lenses or wait for new versions of the lenses I already own. But then even for casuals I don't know who this camera appeals to since even a mid range phone is going to have better video capabilities. Of course the larger pixels on the sensor will make the images more detailed than a cellphone but even so does the average person care outside of professionals? Not really. I dunno. If anything, I think this really solidifies my move to Fujifilm assuming the X-H2 rumors are correct. But this thing right here? This just feels like a slap to the face as a long time customer.
90D will have poor AF through the viewfinder compared to pretty much every modern mirrorless camera. And for video, IBIS is great and if this R7 is indeed shooting oversampled 7k video for the 24, 25 and 30 fps 4k, it will look much, much better than the line-skipped 4k of the 90D. Plus, you can use the EVF on the R7 for video and not on 90D. Ofc there is the ability to use both RF and EF glass too. Long story short - there are at least several obvious advantages with the new camera. Whether they are 600 dollars worth you have to answer for yourself. And your answer will not be valid for everyone...
@@momchilyordanov8190 It's already said to be a line skipped crop. 90D, or rather any DLSRs' viewfinder has dedicated phase detect hardware that only DPAFII competes with. The slightly better video specs worth the extra 600 bucks? At that point it'd be better to go to the R5.
@@williamphillips2239 I wasn't planning on buying it, not with these specs. There is better value for the dollar out there by other vendors as it stands already.
I discovered your channel today, kind of liked your intelligent humour on other videos and was about to subscribe then I saw this. It could even be true that the R7 will be shitty, we have to really wait for the good reviews to know for sure, but the way you presented it was completely biased against Canon (I just hope it's not for being a sony fanboy), you could have made the criticism all you wanted but at least referring that it actually has very good qualities would be more indicating that you know what you were talking about / doing an impartial review. Canon finally removed the 30 min video limit (that is present on the R5), the XT4 has a 20 min limit on 4k24p, the canon autofocus absolutely devastates the fuji one (which in the era of gymbals is more important than most other features), better color science, way better lens access (therefore price), okay it doesn't do HD240p, but who cares about HD in 2022?! Now competing with the sony e-10 (i won't even bother to go against cameras without the popping out screen), IBIS, better screen, 10 bit c-log3 (vs 8 bit), 4k60p no crop (ofc we still have to check the quality, but having that base slomo is a must) - even the fucking holy grail A7iv only does 4k60p on aps-c crop, the sony only wins on the lens range (specially because of sigma and tamron). Extras: you can use a speedbooster, thus getting closer to the full frame or an EF adapter with nd filter built-in for the cinema camera experience.
My good sir first let me say you are entertaining. Now let's continue...this video proves that old age is hitting. You hate change (button layout) and you can't understand why new cameras come out but aren't just loaded with nothing but the finest top end features....even when all along the company was not even trying to keep it a secret that these new cameras are going to be closer to entry level and lower cost. And they even put in autofocus that is on par with the R5 and R6
I wish a camera company would team up with a smartphone maker. Imagine a camera that you could download apps on. Post photos directly to social media and add new functions and programs to the camera. Basically, an open-source camera combined with a smartphone.
Why? Sounds like great features for an amateur camera. Someone posting pics of their kids playing softball directly to social media. Basically, smartphone stuff. But no pro or serious photographer is going to want to pay for those features. Most photographers I shoot with don't even know how to shoot video on their cameras. Nor do they care. They are photographers, not videographers, and if they were they would buy a serious video camera.
Love your video as always. Still, interesting how opinions can differ. For me, the R7 is the camera that finally pulls me into mirrorless. Precisely what I’ve been waiting for. Sure, it might suck in practice, but it’s the first camera in ages I’m actually excited about.
Pre-order is a mistake regardless, R7 we know nothing of its rolling shutter, no one has properly tested the RAW photo output, the video mode is a miss and hit, good 4k 25fps, but really mediocre everything else. No one has properly tested the IBIS on this camera, nor battery life or ISO performance, Canon claims the 32,5MP sensor is "new" but is it really? Again, no one has tested that, so you are buying by feelings, not by logic. I suggest reconsider, if you are mianly into photography, you should stop looking for new cameras because cameras from 2014 already shoot just as good pictures as cameras of 2022. Its mainly IBIS and video thats been the biggest upgrades past 8 years.
@@SMGJohn Yeah you're not wrong. I never really preorder anything. I'd have to see raw performance, particularly high iso. I'm not expecting it to be on par with current FF cameras (nor do I need it to be) but Canon is weird and I need it to be at least as good as the 90D. And yes, video...I'm honestly not bothered at all by the apsc-crop but I need the oversampled 4K @30fps to look great. We'll see. But I'm kind of hopeful for some reason I don't understand :)
@@legendp2011 Yes but Canon could have underclocked the processor to save battery, sensor is also not backlit illuminated so that already means its not as fast readout as R5 is but of a slower type, 90D had pretty bad rolling shutter compared to Sony or Fuji APS-C
12:12 - Skip to 19 seconds into this clip from BBC's The Hunt: ruclips.net/video/gGludGaPKag/видео.html - Of course you can see the heat distortion on that crop in but ... getting the shot matters more. The audience doesn't necessarily care about the extra heat distortion. It can sometimes be too much, and yes, crops magnify the heat distortion. In lower elevations and warmer weather it's worse but ... don't tell people not to use it. David Attenborough does not approve of your advice.
It's not gonna blow you away because consumer cameras are more than enough now. Just focus on improving your abilities and skills. If you're gonna vlog only on your neighborhood, then your ceiling of improvement will be very low.
Hey Kasey. I really need your help here please 🙏. I've been stuck between these 2 cameras for at least 2 months. Get the A7IV with 28-70mm kit lens for USD2880, or the A7C body alone for USD1630, leaving me with USD1200 for a lens to go with the A7C... Please help! These are both good deals. I need it mainly for video and it will be my first full frame, but my concern is also if my laptop will handle the 10 bit A7IV files. Should I just wait a bit for the next release? If you know of something coming, just say "wait" 😆. Thanks for all the guidance and interesting vids.
If you increase the distance for the object you will have more disturbance in the light you receive in the sensor. Is like looking at the star and planets in the sky. The light of the star in the sky is sparkling compared to the planets and this happens because of the distance of the object to the subject. And the amount of the gases the light needs to pass makes the focal point not precise, so the image will look bad. And the gases become more agitated with the heat, it's like looking on the highway and seeing the heatwave.
The autofocus alone is enough reason to upgrade from the 90d. However you have to wonder why they crippled the 90d in the first place and didn’t give it the autofocus system of the 7d MK 2?
Duh!! Because it's a cheaper camera!! You don't get leather seats and a moonroof in a base model car. No one questions that. What is it about cameras that make people think they should get all the features in the cheaper models? As it is, Canon is really good at letting some features slip down the line, like the AF from the R3 in this camera, and most of the features of the R5 in the R6.
I would have liked a APS-C camera to add to my R6 however I would have liked to see the R7 with the same layout as the R6. Someone needs to destroy that cripple hammer.
Why? Does the Sony APS-C cameras have the same layout as the full frame? Does the Nikon Z50 have the same layout as the Z7/9? Every manufacturer does this...
You get what you pay for. If you can get the same camera for 1500.00 as you can for 2500.00 or 3800.00, why by those? No one says a base model car is "crippled" because it doesn't have the features of a top of the line car. That's silly. This looks like a great wildlife camera.
@@alansach8437 what a load of shite. Canon in their professional line up have always kept a very similar layout from the 1D to the 7D. Canon know they have multi-disciplin shooters and being able to switch between bodies with ease is essential. As for your analogy of car models you do not expect different trim of the same model to have controls in different places. You sound like a Canon fan boy trying to defend them rather than looking at it objectively. I would like to be shooting portraits or landscapes with my R6 and then be able to pick up a R7 for wildlife and without thinking know where all the controls are. Is that really that difficult to grasp. Surely it would keep production costs down too if they shared the body. If they were looking to dumb down the camera why give it 30fps?
Not sure why the Canon R7 vs R10 switching back-and-forth in the thumbnail appears to have varying sensor sizes. They are both APS-C. 22.2 x 14.8mm. (Canon's APS-C is 1.62x crop vs. Nikon's 1.52x)
bhp website spec says r7 pixel actual count 34.5 mp but effective is 32 mp i think that's why or simply cause ibis system is lay back abit and makes senor depth look bigger than it really is
The RF kit lenses are crap. The R10 is a newbie body only. The R7, though, looks like the goods even with its imperfections. "Where's the 10 mil? Not anywhere", you say? Not so fast, my friend. You forget the EF-S 10-18mm F/4.5-5.6. Adapt that, and boom: vlogging camera. A little slow, but stabilized and wide at 16-29mm equivalent. With the RF 100-500? Boom, a FF equivalent of 800mm with 32 full MP, instead of losing a bunch of MP with an R5 or R6 in crop mode. Think of the wildlife glory in 4K oversampled from 7K. And that's before adding a 1.4x extender (1120mm!!). Fuji's biggest edge is the lens lineup. Canon need a fuller line of RF-S lenses like they have in the EF-S mount, from 10mm up to 200mm. Anything longer, you want at least the RF 100-400 budget zoom anyway. Atmospheric interference is a problem with shooting from long distance with any camera and lens. It's physics. Regardless of the system and the longest available lens, you still have to get reasonably close to get acceptable image quality. You're getting very nice B-roll when you get close enough to the birds. The R7's 4K/60 is disappointing. But you recorded this video in 4K/24, like I do. So the question is: is the 4K/60 a dealbreaker? Not for me, because I never shoot 4K/60. HD/240 would have been nice; but I use my R5 for 4K/120 so I still have that. In conclusion: I pre-ordered the R7, mainly for birding and vlogging (buying the EF-S 10-18 too). There is no perfect camera, so you'll always have a channel. ;-D (P.S. - swans are jerks.)
@@burritobrosvideos8060 not "no one". You. You're entitled to your opinion. You're not entitled to be rude about it. If you have a better idea for shooting much wider than 18mm on the R7 with kit that actually exists, feel free to share it.
I’m coming from Nikon D70 and I wanted the xt4 but just didn’t pull the trigger. I will buy the canon r7 which is still cheaper for the body by 200 dollars.
I've got the 7d and one eosR. The USB on the eos 7d allow me to conect my camera to my phone, do a little raw edit on any phone app and then printed on a instax printer. **Skate contest to give a photo to all skaters that come. Really cheap but everyone loves it. *Real use case I've done. When you realize the new R cameras not have Magic Lantern and they could use the USB with a phone. Why? The USB conected to a Windows, Mac OS or Linux without problems. So the camera could do It but Canon prefer to sell you their cloud system, that's to make a full video on It cause the cloud app they sell on the eosR it's already discontinued. So the new ecosistem or religion allow to move files from camera to phone by WiFi, first It kill the battery on both diveces. But then your only allowed to move raw photos into Apple phone, Android are forced to JPG. Just remind that the eosR just have a single SD slot and iPhones don't have SD card reader. So Canon preffers you buy a expensive iPhone with large storage, pay the most expensive 4g data conection and a cloud to be able to save your data and then buy and carry external battery to charge your phone and camera. What kind of deal are they making with Apple? Cause I call Canon several times, you can do It. They say the iPhone CPU have special tech that allow the camera send raw photos by WiFi and Android doesn't. That's lies to your own costumers the ones suporting your business. I can move and eddit raw files in my phone no problem and I don't want to buy and carry a laptop to do photo work, cause I need a powerful Desktop for video and that's my tool. Canon wants more tools a laptop, iPhone and atomos ninja cause they look the usb to conect to SSD and the sd card they use is not fast enough to save the files on time...... I'm done with Canon. They use same policy on printers.
I was thinking the R7 seemed like it was barely matching the X-T3 from the rumors but was surprised I didnt see anyone mentioning it. I didnt want to mention it as Id get roasted in vicious comments... The edge I was speculating was the higher mp and better af. The mp difference isnt a game changer and its on older sensor tech than the X-T3... AF is always going to be the argument against fuji but I almost exclusively shoot on adapted vintage glass (poor not hippie) so it doesnt bother me.
What other APS-C camera has 4K 60p, IBIS, dual card slots, the best AF system on the market and can shoot 15fps mechanical/30 electronic? and all of it for $1,500. I'll wait....
@@michaelbell75 The Fuji X-T4... Released over two years ago and has a complete lens lineup (: Also note reviews of the 4k60 and 1080p120 looking soft as shit on the R7....
@@ivanchao8872 XT-4 has garbage AF and can't shoot 30 fps electronic without a 1.2x cripple hammer crop. It only does 20fps. Oh and Canon has a more complete lineup. You can use RF and EF glass on the R7...Oh and I said for $1500 too. The X-T4 is an overpriced $1700 lol
@@michaelbell75 If ya wanna talk cripple hammer... R7's 4k60 is either subsampled (soft n shitty) or needs a 1.81x crop on top of the 1.6x canon apsc crop. Not to mention the rolling shutter again... Meanwhile the XT4 is oversampled and again, over two years older. Regarding lenses... You want to count old chunky adapted DSLR glass as part of the lens mount? Alongside expensive ass full frame glass? Id happily pay fuji X prices over Canon FF RF prices...
@@ivanchao8872 Wrong, go watch Dan Watson;s review on the R7 video specs. EF lenses may not be brand new, but at least a dozen of them kill any lens Fuji has ever released.
What other APS-C camera has 4K 60p, IBIS, dual card slots, the best AF system on the market and can shoot 15fps mechanical/30 electronic? and all of it for $1,500. I'll wait....
@@michaelbell75 No idea, don't care. I am sure there is market for this, but how many customers are there for such new limited cumbersome system? AU, UK and Europe is ripped off price wise. This is going to be $2000 camera here. Add medium set of lenses, and you are near $5000 system quick. And so it is not that tempting, despite the specsheet.
Biggest cripple hammer 🔨 is they weather sealed the R7 , because they know it’s going outdoors! And then the sensor specific RF-s lenses aren’t weather sealed? WTF 🤬
The problem is that the R7 is good for photography, but not great for video. When it comes to video, if you want decent, problem-free 4K video, Canon want you to buy into their expensive Cinema EOS line cameras and the expensive RF-mount lenses that are available for the newest Cinema EOS cameras. I'm trying to find a hybrid camera that does video as well as it does stills, and such a beast really doesn't exist - yet.
If you buy today's gear through my affiliate links, Canon will drive the cripple hammer out to the woods and leave it there. But will it find it's way back?!
Canon R7 bhpho.to/3MMkjwX
Canon R10 bhpho.to/3MNStQY
Instagram instagram.com/vegetablepolice/
All my gear and recommended products can be found in my affiliate shop, thanks for shopping around! www.amazon.com/shop/vegetablepolice
Yep...more of an ass man
Canons biggest problem is their lens selections for RF, too expensive, too big. They need an f2 of 24mm , 10-20mm f4.
I always thought of the cripple hammer in your videos as sort of Thor's hammer. Will it not just fly back to the hands of Canon after it's done it crippling or when it's left in the woods (and think of all the animals it will cripple after it has been left in the woods).
Hey how come these vegan doesn't reply to anyone on his videos. Damn vegans🥑🍆
You look like Booger from the Revenge of the Nerd movies. Same actor in the movie Risky Business.
I'm here just for the board room meeting 🤣
I still rock a Canon 7D with Magic lantern: shooting RAW video + timelapses. I was looking forward to this R7 coming out, but I agree with you... not as impressive as I think it should be for video. And those RF-S lenses so far are crazy unappealing (at least spec wise).
You DO realize you can use any of the stellar RF lenses on this camera right? You also realize you can use any EF lens too right? lol. Only amateurs shoot crop lenses on crop cameras. Ive been shooting 18 years and Ive never used a crop lens on any crop sensor Canon.
@@michaelbell75 a compact good rf lens with constant aperture will be nice for traveling. I am very happy about the quality and portability of my m43 system. But will probably get a R7 for the autofocus and better stills capabilities. But would something small like my 12-40 mm F2.8 for the M43.
imagine the reach with the RF extendible 800mm prime, you'd be able to see the lizard mens bases on the moon which we never went to.
The moon is too close to focus on for that lens
Oh let me do the math for the Toneh... 11* 3 in the enhanced mode. Toneh 33! All the universe will be in focus nice!
800mm is not that long focal lenght guys, not sure why Casey think otherwise 😄
The R7 has great rolling shutter to recreate famous old-timey warpy pics!
The R7 also has a loud mechanical shutter that mimics a woodpecker - great for attracting wildlife photographers in your area!
The R7 also has crippled video specs so that it can't overheat! Ingenious!
For real though, 32.5mp and Canon autofocus are nice. Might be a good wildlife camera if the mechanical shutter doesn't scare everything away.
‘A loud mechanical shutter that mimics a woodpecker’. Perhaps using the silent electronic shutter might be in order? Here’s another thought. Don’t buy it. Problem of your hating it, solved.
@@frankanderson5012 No need to get salty, I was only praising the Cripple Hammer's work. 😜
@@frankanderson5012 shoot a fast action with the shitty rolling shutter and bam you’re done, warpy birds or people everywhere
Also cheap build quality.
R7 sucks ass
I started out with a Canon T6s. When I went full frame I switched to Nikon and bought a ditto for its low light performance. I now use a z6 ii. One of the reasons why I switched was because Canon cripples their cameras. I do like how Fuji puts everything into their next model without worrying about hiring the sells of a different model. I think Nikon may go that route this time. Imagine if Nikon makes a d750 I too replace the d500 with the same tech that's in the z9. Stacked bsi sensor, no mechanical shutter, 4k video with every option, at least 20 fps. That camera would be a beast. I'm glad Canon came out with the R7 before noon comes out with their version with similar specs. Nikon probably has the best ergonomics followed by Fuji. I haven't looked at a Panasonic yet but I'm sure theirs is good. I think Canon is getting designed by aliens with weird fingers or something.
IMHO, Panasonic has perhaps the best ergos and features. I'd buy nothing but Panasonic if it weren't for the crappy continuous AF.
I'm a former D750/D500 owner shooting Z's and they have lost the ergonomics award. Mostly due to firmware limitations and not saving every function to a user mode. I had the D750 first, and I felt like the D500 was an upgrade to the D750.
My Z7II still doesn't have the responsiveness of my D500. I'm constantly switching an Fn button for metering or subject tracking or whatever. A menu, MyMenu, touchscreen, and buttons that just don't work as well as the physical "pro" layout (D2xx/D3xx/D5xx/D6xx/D7xx/D8xx. 85% of the photos from my Z50/Z7II combo are better than f-mount bodies. AF-C and the firmware just isn't there yet. Neither even have a 1/3 crop grid!
I want a Z6II sensor with IBIS in a D750 body with D500 performance, a fully articulating screen (no FX Nikon has one,) and a pop-up warm LED flash. Had they made this f-mount 3-4 years ago they'd have owned the market IMO.
@@skyrunr you have to remember that Nikon is on their 2nd gen cameras with the z6 II and z7 II. The z9 is probably considered 3rd gen. They recently stated that the next models coming out will have some of the same technology that's in the z9. Will that be stacked sensors? Electronic shutter only? Better tracking? We don't know yet. I think all of the bodies will be back to normal size so they can dissipate heat from using them in video mode. I also believe there will be a mirrorless d500 come out with similar specs as the z9. It'll be cheaper and probably won't do 8k.
@@carlmcneill1139 Yes, I'd be happy with a few decent firmware updates. The glaZZ is unmatched, but super sharp is no good if AF-C isn't there. I want to buy them all, but the beauty of them as I only need 3-4. I don't even shoot video, but I still want an articulating screen. Mostly to flip it over and protect it, or shoot in a crowd over people's heads without disrupting someone's video behind me. A full 90 degrees down would be enough.
@@skyrunr I want a fully articulating screen for when I take landscape pictures down low in portrait orientation. I have a Canon T6s with the flip out screen like that and it works great in those situations. I really think Nikon will be putting them in soon.
The Canon board meetings are always some of the funniest shit I've ever seen 🤣🤣🤣
The silent stare at the beginning always kills me 😂😂
I think for video the appeal of the canon r7 is the ability to use cheap ef lenses. sigma 18-35mm f1.8 on the canon r7 with the ef to rf nd adapter means you get.....10bit, IBIS, vari-ND, auto-focus and f1.8 contant aperture for a very low price. I've also seen used ef mount sigma 50-150mm f2.8 lenses for $300
For a very low price? You could buy an a7iii and get all of the features WITH a Full frame sensor for less. What a joke
@@Yupthereitism a7iii is 8bit colour, and fly by wire focus lenses (screw on nd filters). A7iii screen blacks out when using a monitor in 4k (and loses reliable autofocus).
A7iii has a lot of issues for video (and expensive fly by wire lenses). Either spend more and get a sony a7siii, or go cheaper and get a used fuji xt3 (and upgrade to the fuji xh2s down the line).
Edit: or use a canon r7 with the option of moving to blackmagic or canon cinema cameras (canon c200, c300 mkiii). Ef lenses are cheap and great for using manual focus when needed (while also having “ok” autofocus)
Christopher Frost always left the Canon 32.5mp APS-C sensor from the M6 mkii as the last in his lens tests. That sensor is so brutal even Pro grade EF lenses struggled to deliver. That's the biggest cripple blow.
But this isn’t the same sensor as that. Canon has said dozens of times its a new sensor
@@AndrewKuttor it's about pixel size at that crop and resolution, not the sensor technology, it's much more demanding on lenses
@@PrimalShutter I know about pixel pitch. However, it isn't as easy as just saying the bigger the photo site the better the sensor. There is a lot going on between the sensor and the image you see after capture.
For instance, the R5c and the R5 uses the same sensor, however the R5c gets better dynamic range. Now there is a rumor that the Digic X in the R5c is modified. But it could also be the codecs. Whatever the case, they should get the same exact DR, but they don't.
There are cameras with more megapixels with smaller sensors that outshoot cameras with larger sensors and less megapixels.
Now their pixel pitches are pretty close... the c70 is 6.40um while the R3 is 6.00um.
The C70 with a Super35 outshoots my R3 for instance... now the R3 might be sharper, but the highlight rolloff, the dynamic range, the color depth.. ya know the stuff that matters with video, it does way better on.
Despite the fact the C70 is a super35 sensor and the R3 is a Full-frame.
However, lets walk back a moment and really think about this camera... it's a $1499 camera. First and foremost. That's cheaper than a gh5 mark II, that's cheaper than a Sony a7c. Its made for wildlife, a photography first camera. So for wildlife you would want something that can capture relatively fast, 15fps, that is very sharp, has IBIS, with lots of AF -- this $1499 camera has that,.
@@AndrewKuttor his point was that there are no lenses that can perform well enough in the center to justify an increase in megapixels. Its a demanding sensor since the mpx are centered in the center. You will have to pay thousands on glass to take advantage of this sensor or you'll just be magnifying lens and shooting errors. It's essentially a cripple.
@@burritobrosvideos8060 you are correct about the sensor being more demanding. But the corners would be the most demanding of all (If somehow the sensor was aligned to the extreme corner of the full frame).
THe HAMMER!!!! You keep getting better at this small stories !!!! Keep them coming they are fantastic!!!!!
I completely agree with the power switch on the R7 being a mistake having taken the place of the rear top command dial. They should have taken the command dial/power lever from the R10 and put it on the R7. The ergonomics of the R5 and R6 were heading in the right direction from the stupid R’s touchbar and lack of rear aperture wheel, and now this. Hopefully Canon opens up the RF mount or puts out affordable, brighter RF-s glass
On the R7 I can control all of my settings with just the front dial and the rear wheel while looking through the viewfindder in FV mode. Just my finger and thumb. Very simple!
Yeah im also super happy with the controls. Especially as someone who never had a control wheel at the back at all (only entry level APS-C DSLR and the EOS RP yet)
Sometimes i really miss a control wheel but its still doable since the R7 allow pretty much any mapping on the buttons.
I really tried to not like the R7, especially the R10. But the more i realized how bad the EOS RP is for wildlife and video (wasnt considered at all at purchase!) the more i began to think about getting the R7 and soon i liked it. Still the price is too high considering the flaws and missing features like 240fps video.
R7 and R10 is fine for most 7D and 90D users. But I have EF-M lenses. 8 tiny lenses. I want at least R10 but smaller and with M mount.
That isn't coming, I'm afraid. Canon have already said their R&D is focused on the RF system. They'll keep making EF-M mount gear because it sells; but they won't develop anything new for that system.
As a 7D user, I can tell you that this is not fine. I was expecting a pro-body, not an updated 90D.
@@ericb8985 what is not pro about the R7? I used the 7Dmk2, some 5D bodies, 6D, R5, 70D, 80D, and I can not spot a huge difference beside the 7D being chunky as 5Dmk3 with the awful dynamic range of the 70D
@@dtibor5903 "Pro" usually includes top-end features. The 7D bodies were all at the top of the game when they were released and therefore offered unique advantages. The R7 has a worse viewfinder and IBIS than the other RF bodies and its sensor doesn't add any low-light performance for wildlife photography. Canon didn't try to create an ASP-C camera with their best technology and that's what doesn't make this a pro camera. Existing bodies can fully replace the R7 which wasn't quite the case for the 7D and 7D II.
He started this video off hilariously pissed with canon😂😆😂😆😂😆
Funniest boardroom meeting in ages!
WHOA! Camera Conspiracies with a day one recap! Introducing: The Canon "Cripple Nipple!" 😂
About time you gave a shoutout to my Blackmagic bois. $1499 for a 90D with two lenses. Literally buy anything else. EOS R is $1499 refurbished right now.
What other APS-C camera has 4K 60p, IBIS, dual card slots, the best AF system on the market and can shoot 15fps mechanical/30 electronic? and all of it for $1,500. I'll wait....
I've been on the 90D since 2019. Basically waited for 3 years for Canon to release something like the R7. But they waited a bit too long. Switched to a GH5 Mark II a couple weeks ago and have seen the light. I could still return it and go back to Canon but I'm staying with Pany. This camera is more fun and more customizable than Canon has ever been. Also autofocus is not as bad as many say. Good bye Canon cripple hammer. Hello Gh5!
The panasonics are not as bad in low light as people make them out to be
@@burritobrosvideos8060 Panasonic "We're Not As Bad As You Think!" Come see our exhibition in the rusty shack by the gator swamp, the location is not as bad as you think!
@@filmstudiojapan ok
Cripple hammer? LOL! What other APS-C camera has 4K 60p, IBIS, dual card slots, the best AF system on the market and can shoot 15fps mechanical/30 electronic? and all of it for $1,500. I'll wait....
@@michaelbell75 who the fuck buys apsc anymore? The low light performance will be TRASH. Especially when the only affordable rf lenses are so SLOW. Good luck getting any non grainy pictures 🤣😂🤣
The AF is great. Plus there's the light and affordable 100-400 here. R7 supports sync stabilization. I think it will sell well.
R7 price is great, from Canon I was expecting a 2k$ camera, pleasant surprise.
Crummy evf, crummy screen, crummy weather sealing, removed rear wheel, no native apsc lenses, and old sensor with poor high iso performance.
It will. This is all a bitter rant about what I don't know. All those options are stellar. You're not gonna get the same quality in a R7 that you would an R3 or R5. That's like getting an A7RIII and being upset it doesn't stack up to an A9
Here I was looking at all the early reviews of the R7 (we know, who those guys are). I was feeling the temptation to ditch my X-T4 and getting the same or better specs and that autofocus (X-T4 woes). The board meeting was absolutely fantastic. Canon mindset explained. Thanks for setting things straight for me. Lesson: Don't watch those early reviews.
I've tried to justify the R7, and cannot. I'm kinda old school and still very content with DSLR.
This is the best place to come when you're hyped about a camera. You get slapped back into reality. 😂
2:31 - Omg YES! Finally ... Footage you found of the Cripple Hammer invading the board room to intimidate an ambitious, new Canon engineer. I knew you had this footage somewhere lol :)
I'm so blessed not to have money to buy this stuff, so cant get angry at it, but always fun to watch you complain about it :)
One of the strengths of Canon cameras has been ergonomics. All of the prosumer and professional cameras have a predictable layout of controls, menu, and user interface that allow the photographer who uses more than one camera in the field to quickly and easily switch between cameras without missing a beat. The Canon R7 completely changed the predictable layout found on the Canon 7D Mark II, all the 5 series bodies, the 1DX series, and the new layout on the R5 and R6. While the specifications and feature set are really exciting Canon stopped short of true excellence. For example, 30 fps is great but the buffer and comparatively slow memory cards results in a frustratingly short 2-2.5 sec of continuous shooting before the camera starts buffering. For a camera that is aimed at sports and wildlife enthusiast photographers a larger buffer and/or faster storage would better meet the needs of that target market. Oversampled 4K at 24 p but not at 60 p is another example of stopping short of excellence. I wonder whether Canon has plans to produce a more professional level APS camera? That would be greatly welcomed.
The sensor is still pretty slow so you don’t want to shoot with the electronic shutter for moving stuff
Someone quickly handed me a 60D many years ago and I couldn't find the power button. I tried an EOS-R and couldn't stand a dial only being used for power. LOL I found all the little buttons difficult to reach by feel compared to Nikon as well.
Not a BSI sensor - that's a deal beaker... for what I was hoping to be a pro APSc setup, the smaller sensor should have been BSI to extract the best possible image quality. That and 240 FPS in 1080p - then I'd jump on it... but as it is, I'll pass... Long live the cripple hammer...
Please. This thing is going to easily be the best crop sensor camera on the market for the price. No one wants to pay an extra $500+ for a BSI sensor lol. Wait for the top of the line APS-C R camera which Im sure will have it. Go ahead and stupidly pay $3K for it too.
The Fuji X-S10, but you don’t always need BSI to produce great images. The Canon 7D don’t have BSI, neither does the Z5 or D500, and all 3 produce excellent image quality. With Canon’s trademarked dual pixel technology, you don’t need BSI. The R7 also gets AF II technology directly from the R3, which should get you some great shots.
hahahah ok that skit was hilarious, love it.
You make my day, as usual. I hope to god i never weaken and buy another Canon. Not just because of this video but because i think Canon take amateur photographers for fools. It started with the EOS 650. And has gone on ever since. Now they offer not much for the enthusiast, if you want better then go for the high end stuff with stupidly priced lenses.
The no BS video I've been waiting for thank you
@@ThomasGTV are u from Canon
I have a 5d iv im thinking switching to R7 to get ibis and autofocus and some other good stuff meh i mean u could put a speed booster on it's close enough to full frame use a tamron g2 24-70 f2.8 maybe it will be 27-80 mill f2.0 equivalent with speedbooster probably its a little noisyer then full frame yeah well what do u think ? should i do it am i crazy or i don't know what im taking about here ?!
I tested the R6. Mainly photography. Perfect body. The autofocus oh my gosh. So awesome. I cried. But their lenses to dang big and heavy. That ruined it.
do you even lift
@@Ivan-xg1zo no uber
Casey that pan down was art, you could see what happened in the water reflection👏
I try to tell myself that every night lol.
Before watching: I really like r7.
After watching: Screw canon.
I swear Canon is watching this right now and they're like, "Man what a roast! I hate this guy!" 😂🤣
I found your channel by chance. Great humor, too much coffee. 🤣🤣 got a new sub here.
I am bitterly disappointed with this release . I am looking to upgrade my 7D mkii. When it was released it was a pro grade camera and pretty much the pinnacle of aps-c format. It shared the same form factor as the 5D Canon full frame pro body of the day , but had superior burst rate and flagship level auto focus . I was expecting something along the same lines for the R7 , an aps-c R5 if you like .
I lost the bulk of my kit recently in a natural disaster. I am down to a 100-400 zoom and an18-55 kit lens that I never got around to selling . I no longer have the massive investment in canon glass and bodies that once kept me glued to the brand .
I guess I just need to manage my expectations , but canon may have lost me .
If you are stills only... Isn't R7 perfect? No need to get new lens anyway... Grab the adapter/speedbooster and it's all good to go
I agree wholeheartedly with your assessment. The Canon 7D Mark II was a far more professional level camera in its day and in the overall Canon product line up than is the current Canon R7. While the new sensor is offers higher resolution, much better auto focus, and all of the benefits of a modern mirrorless camera, I feel that Canon stopped short of developing a true successor to the Canon 7D Mark II. I can only hope that there are plans to release a more professionally oriented APS camera. I, too, have a massive investment in Canon lenses and multiple bodies. So, it would be prohibitively expensive to switch to Sony or to Nikon.
@@VABrowneMDPhD I suggest you guys watch previews of guys who have actually used the camera. It's 33 meglixels, has IBIS, solid body with the R3's autofocus on tracking! For $1500, what's not to like? 4K60 is plenty. Definitely need more affordable RF lenses but it sounds good to me.
@@gregorybeale old sensor, removed dials, not weather sealed, no native lenses, poor video specs, coats as much as full frame. What’s not disappointing?
@@zegzbrutal it has great performance but I don't know how it will fare in a tropical downpour or banging against rocks while scambling across a mountainside.
I am not a fan of its unique form factor . Before I lost my 6D in flooding , I would shoot with both it and my 7dmkii it was a pain in the arse switching between the two due to the different control layouts .
They could’nt even give us good 1080P 240 fps. By the time 240 fps is in a Canon R series cam, Sony and Nikon will already have 1080P 960 fps. Lol
You forget that this is a photography camera. To Canon, video is optional x.x and if you want better video features, then you have to pay the premium for it or pay even more and go to their cinema lineup 😉
@@Samiam-mu5ln maybe R1C will have it. 😉
What other APS-C camera has 4K 60p, IBIS, dual card slots, the best AF system on the market and can shoot 15fps mechanical/30 electronic? and all of it for $1,500. I'll wait....
I think R7 is a good camera though it won't shoot all-I in 4k 60p, it also has no recording limit. Its autofocus is better than any Fuji camera right now. Fuji XH-2 has a really tough competition.
Fuji is better now
@@Yupthereitism I don't know man. XH 2S looks like a very good lighter BMPCC6K camera without B Raw but with still unreliable autofocus. I mean I wanted to like that camera so much but that just one thing destroys my prospects.
32.5 MP on apsc seems pretty demanding for the lenses, I think you'll need some high-quality lenses to maximise the resolution.
How about a.. f/4.5-6.3 18-45mm? Yeah we knew you'd like that!
I think a lot of R7s will be sold as backup cameras to people who already have RF glass. I wouldn't mind trying the 24-105 f/4 L on an R7.
@@RhettAnderson you understand that's a 40-150 5,6 equivalent lens on an ASP-C?
@@ChaplainDMK 38-168 on a Canon 1.6x crop, but yeah. Would make it feel like a short tele. Sounds fun.
Who will be the first to strap a $3K RF 100-500 on a $1,500 body?
Canon's is trying to make up for the lackluster ef-m line. Stick with full frame Canon. If you want APS-C go Fuji or Sony. Excellent lenses from Fufjifilm and great video options from Sony.
Sony APS-C is pretty ass. Some decent lenses but the actual cameras are not very good. Terrible IBIS and bad noise handling above 1600 ISO.
Within like one second of the intro I was dying lol
Aerial photographer here. I currently run a 90D. I think I’m gonna try the R7. I like the sensor stab and 15/30 fps rates. The joystick/wheel thing is really strange but I’m willing to forego judgement until I use it. I’d prefer if it were physically larger. I like having some hunk to hold on to when shooting through the removed door of a fast moving copter or plane
When I buy in a few weeks I’ll be sure to use your link!
If this is a true 7D replacement, they may yet offer a proper battery grip for it.
I don’t think that joystick wheel is a dumb idea , my 5ds have a wheel lower down and I love it , with this I don’t have to move my thumb from the joystick to the wheel so it’s one less step . Although have to try it first to see if I like it . Sure it’s really ugly but it’s not like it’s a sexy camera to begin with
Don't buy half-arsed cameras. They are just there to rake in money for the R&D. Go for the next iteration. The R10 is over £1000 with a lens for a pretty basic camera. That's a £500 camera.
I hear rumours of new Sony apsc lenses meaning Sony have yet to abandon the APSC line. Hopefully they bring out a camera with a stacked sensor to reduce the horrible rolling shutter.
Y would sony abandon its apsc? Its one of their best seller line up. Its just sony doesnt focus on apsc. Most of their resource is spent on ff
Bang on. It will be a 24MP stacked sensor video focused camera with no rolling shutter for the 'tube. It's not looking good for the Sony APS-C flagship at 32 or 40MP that I am waiting for, as Sony is probably selling those sensors to Fuj for the XH2.
yeah, I'm so disappointed with far away objects even though my lens reaches to them, they are all foggy, blurry and uninspiring. Landscape shots at max zoom are the worst, often the camera can't even focus on distant foggy mountains at all and manually it's impossible to tell whether you're in focus or it's just heat waves and fatamorgana
What camera are you talking about? You left out pertinent information.
@@AllThingsFilm1 it doesn't matter. Fuji, Canon, Sony - it works the same
The one thing I thought looked good was the bird in flight tracking. Shamefully, I watched froknows preview, and he tracked Canadian geese I think through trees in a 360 degree arc, and it performed incredibly well. That is the only real selling point for these cameras, and all it is, is that digic processor. That’s it. If the X-H2/s has autofocus that is even nearly on that level then Canon is floating in the water like a stale turd when it comes to aps-c.
Watching fro is acceptable as long as you mute the audio. Then you don't have to listen to his attempts to have a "signature attitude" or whatever his excuse is.
LOL. Panasonic AF is straight garbage. You've clearly never even touched a Canon R3 much less used one. It has the best AF on the market and the same AF system is in the $1500 R7. Try again.
I want to see an X-H2 Vs R7 comparison before I put my order in .
@@michaelbell75 what does Panasonic or the R3 have to do with anything?
@@michaelbell75 have you had a chance to compare R3 to Sony A1 hands on? It seems those are considered the top 2 these days.
I use Canon M50 and I like canon colours and ease of use but I am blown away with Sony cameras specs. R7 interesting but what lens to use? F4 costs over£1500 and f2 over £3000. Who can justify that? What lenses for RUclipsrs or social media content creators?
Use a speedbooster (ef to rf) and check sigma lenses. That's what I'm doing 🔥
@@jordanmiranda8038 where did you preorder your R7?
"while Derek walks off his headache..." 😂
Hi my name is Derek and I was drinking coffee while watching this
Man that toneh is incredible!
Love your work, CC!
That ending was perfect! 😄😄
I think it looks like a really good camera for wildlife for that price , you get ibis , some weathersealing, good ergonomics , autofocus that will blow Fuji etc out of the water , 15fps with descent buffer (slow sensor so you don’t want shoot with electronic shutter etc for 1500 dollar . How is that a hard sell ?
This comment did not age well. Looks like fujis new autofocus crushes the canons
@@Yupthereitism no I seen several test with fujis new camera and all say it’s still behind in tracking
@@Yupthereitism 10 days is not an aging comment ... If so yours didn't age well . Canons digic x is way 2 fast
How is the back wheel a cripple ? Canon have had a wheel in the back for a long time this is just a new version where you domt have to move your thumb down from the joystick .No idea I’f I will prefer this from my 5ds have to try it first but I would not call it a cripple. For being crippled it has to be a option they have dumbed down .. the kit lens is stupid tough 18-45 there is barely any zoom
They love old technology peddling haha and sometimes, like at 8:05 about the m/s/c button I wonder if you even know how photography works 🤣
I have both a 90d and a M6II. For nature walks, i have a 24-105L version I with a speedbooster on the M6II and a 100-400L version I for the 90D. I have used the 100-400 on both. Either way, adapting older EF glass on both, the autofocus is way better than i would ever be able to do manually. The R7 should be a terrific autofocuser with the digic X chip and would be an awesome upgrade for the 90D to get the EVF, as the optical hit rate is only so-so. The optical view finder is a pleasure to use, but not as confident as the DPAF. I hear that the 100-400 version II works way better on the 32mp sensors than the version I i have. EF glass is cheap and plentiful and performs way better than adaptations on other systems. My 2 cents from a longtime canon fanboy.
OHH! Jarod did not say anything. I’ll stick with my Nikon Z50. Thank you!! I need my dials and I set the manual focus to ISO. Give all controls at me fingers.
May the Cripple Hammer be your constant companion!
I made expensive looking videos with my old XT3 that ran around other directors even using RED cameras. No one believed me lol Fuji IQ is crazy for the value. Hard to beat.
Last year I could’ve bought the entry level RED. I opted for the Fuji XT4. Best decision I ever made. Not only do I have an incredible 4K movie camera, an incredible still camera, as well.
Pre-ordered the R7. Never thought I would but i shoot with the 90D and this is at least for my need a good release. Need the AF, the Color’s and get already great results for my stuff. Do macro and regular product vids (watches..) and mainly studio with once and a while going to an exhibition. so in the end Stabe is great, image quality is good enough and better what I am getting currently out of my 90D so I will give it a try. Still a lil bit scared of the files but lets see. thanks for your thoughts, helped me to get a bit more realistic in regards of expectations but look forward to this one. Hope for new lenses end of this year, will adapt right now my ef and Efs Glas, which is OK. Cheers mate.
Buy the r6, its better
@@burritobrosvideos8060 It does overheat in 4K and I do macro shots in my vids. I need to be closer. Plus the Color of the R6 is not my cup of tea its a bit too orange for my taste. So nope, not for me
@@mb-watches you won't like the colors of the r7 if you don't like the r6. If you need 4k go with gh5, fuji, blackmahic which will all be better than cannon. If you need stills or lowlight performance go with fill frame.
@@burritobrosvideos8060 Fuji Panasonic and Blackmagic all have garbage AF compared to the R3s AF system. But you wouldn't know that because you are a clown who's never even seen an R3 in person much less used one.
@@burritobrosvideos8060 what I did see is that the Color’s
If the R7 look close to my 90D which I like. Will give it a try, I do as well talking head and autofocus must work.
The hammer is sooo funny 😆
I when the crippling feature of the R7 is the low Res EVF !
Low Res back screen is ok, but tye EVF for sports and wildlife zooming at distance,..really Canon !
Finally, an honest review ... Of reviews.
I am an owner of a R7 who is about to sell it with all the RF, RF-S, EF and EF-S I got to switch to Sony just because of the lack of decent RF-S lenses and superpricey RF L lenses that btw this R7 wouldn't take all the advantage from. It's a pitty, I like the R7 so much, but is all about the lenses and canon has also banned third party manufacturers. Damn, I am so mad at Canon...but you made me laugh so hard with this. God bless you.
why cant you use an rf mount to ef adapter and use ef lenses? i mean i heard ibis performs badly when you do that but. (im thinking of getting a r7)
@@TheGentooGamer ibis performs perfectly fine with the EF adaptar in my experience, not worry for that. The problem is the size, the weight, and of course that you won't take all the advantage of the RF bayonet of the R7 sensor. For me Sony + sigma lenses is the perfect choice right now.
@@ipbsoft ok, good to know. i been getting very mixed reports of ibis not working with ef lenses which is a bit worrying, not sure. id like to get a good hybrid camera (although mainly for youtube video), and yah at the price-point ($1,364.95 on walmart) the r7 has seemed pretty compelling, aside from maybe lens selection. as for weight, lighter would be nice but i already been using full frame EF lenses on my old rebel t3 so cant be that bad. every video i have seen who has given an r7 alternative has been something more expensive or something that isnt water resistant or has a 30 min record limit or smth of that nature (id like to hike with whatever i get)
I've been on the Canon APSC platform for a good while since APSC makes more sense if you're in situations where longer focal ranges are what's needed. I love my T6s but I need better video capabilities. Looking at the R7, I really fail to see why I'm supposed to invest into it over the 90D. I can find 90Ds for sale going for 900 bucks while the R7 is like 1500 bucks for the opportunity to use the same sensor and to either buy an adapter for my lenses or wait for new versions of the lenses I already own. But then even for casuals I don't know who this camera appeals to since even a mid range phone is going to have better video capabilities. Of course the larger pixels on the sensor will make the images more detailed than a cellphone but even so does the average person care outside of professionals? Not really. I dunno. If anything, I think this really solidifies my move to Fujifilm assuming the X-H2 rumors are correct. But this thing right here? This just feels like a slap to the face as a long time customer.
90D will have poor AF through the viewfinder compared to pretty much every modern mirrorless camera. And for video, IBIS is great and if this R7 is indeed shooting oversampled 7k video for the 24, 25 and 30 fps 4k, it will look much, much better than the line-skipped 4k of the 90D. Plus, you can use the EVF on the R7 for video and not on 90D. Ofc there is the ability to use both RF and EF glass too. Long story short - there are at least several obvious advantages with the new camera. Whether they are 600 dollars worth you have to answer for yourself. And your answer will not be valid for everyone...
@@momchilyordanov8190 It's already said to be a line skipped crop. 90D, or rather any DLSRs' viewfinder has dedicated phase detect hardware that only DPAFII competes with. The slightly better video specs worth the extra 600 bucks? At that point it'd be better to go to the R5.
So don't buy it ...nobody is forcing you! That increases my chance of being one of the first pre-orders to get theirs in the first batch release!
@@williamphillips2239 I wasn't planning on buying it, not with these specs. There is better value for the dollar out there by other vendors as it stands already.
@@williamphillips2239 where did you preorder yours?
Any word if the 1080p 24/30fps video is downsampled as well?
I discovered your channel today, kind of liked your intelligent humour on other videos and was about to subscribe then I saw this. It could even be true that the R7 will be shitty, we have to really wait for the good reviews to know for sure, but the way you presented it was completely biased against Canon (I just hope it's not for being a sony fanboy), you could have made the criticism all you wanted but at least referring that it actually has very good qualities would be more indicating that you know what you were talking about / doing an impartial review.
Canon finally removed the 30 min video limit (that is present on the R5), the XT4 has a 20 min limit on 4k24p, the canon autofocus absolutely devastates the fuji one (which in the era of gymbals is more important than most other features), better color science, way better lens access (therefore price), okay it doesn't do HD240p, but who cares about HD in 2022?!
Now competing with the sony e-10 (i won't even bother to go against cameras without the popping out screen), IBIS, better screen, 10 bit c-log3 (vs 8 bit), 4k60p no crop (ofc we still have to check the quality, but having that base slomo is a must) - even the fucking holy grail A7iv only does 4k60p on aps-c crop, the sony only wins on the lens range (specially because of sigma and tamron). Extras: you can use a speedbooster, thus getting closer to the full frame or an EF adapter with nd filter built-in for the cinema camera experience.
My good sir first let me say you are entertaining. Now let's continue...this video proves that old age is hitting. You hate change (button layout) and you can't understand why new cameras come out but aren't just loaded with nothing but the finest top end features....even when all along the company was not even trying to keep it a secret that these new cameras are going to be closer to entry level and lower cost. And they even put in autofocus that is on par with the R5 and R6
You sound like a bitter old man.
Yeah and it overheats just like the R5 & R6!
you know it is going to be fun video even before watching when it has +5 seconds of silence with not moving soul less face intro.
I wish a camera company would team up with a smartphone maker. Imagine a camera that you could download apps on. Post photos directly to social media and add new functions and programs to the camera. Basically, an open-source camera combined with a smartphone.
The Samsung Galaxy NX was pretty cool
Why? Sounds like great features for an amateur camera. Someone posting pics of their kids playing softball directly to social media. Basically, smartphone stuff. But no pro or serious photographer is going to want to pay for those features. Most photographers I shoot with don't even know how to shoot video on their cameras. Nor do they care. They are photographers, not videographers, and if they were they would buy a serious video camera.
@@alansach8437 have You ever heard of the Magic Lantern hack for Canon cameras?
It a satellite phone you could do live broadcasts with, send b-roll directly to editor, footage dailies to a director.
Very refreshing insights 😀. Hilarious. Thanks
Love your video as always. Still, interesting how opinions can differ. For me, the R7 is the camera that finally pulls me into mirrorless. Precisely what I’ve been waiting for. Sure, it might suck in practice, but it’s the first camera in ages I’m actually excited about.
Pre-order is a mistake regardless, R7 we know nothing of its rolling shutter, no one has properly tested the RAW photo output, the video mode is a miss and hit, good 4k 25fps, but really mediocre everything else.
No one has properly tested the IBIS on this camera, nor battery life or ISO performance, Canon claims the 32,5MP sensor is "new" but is it really? Again, no one has tested that, so you are buying by feelings, not by logic.
I suggest reconsider, if you are mianly into photography, you should stop looking for new cameras because cameras from 2014 already shoot just as good pictures as cameras of 2022. Its mainly IBIS and video thats been the biggest upgrades past 8 years.
@@SMGJohn Yeah you're not wrong. I never really preorder anything. I'd have to see raw performance, particularly high iso. I'm not expecting it to be on par with current FF cameras (nor do I need it to be) but Canon is weird and I need it to be at least as good as the 90D. And yes, video...I'm honestly not bothered at all by the apsc-crop but I need the oversampled 4K @30fps to look great. We'll see. But I'm kind of hopeful for some reason I don't understand :)
And autofocus
@@SMGJohn r7 is using the ssame proccessor as the r5 and r5c. so the rolling shutter will not be any worse than those cameras
@@legendp2011
Yes but Canon could have underclocked the processor to save battery, sensor is also not backlit illuminated so that already means its not as fast readout as R5 is but of a slower type, 90D had pretty bad rolling shutter compared to Sony or Fuji APS-C
12:12 - Skip to 19 seconds into this clip from BBC's The Hunt: ruclips.net/video/gGludGaPKag/видео.html - Of course you can see the heat distortion on that crop in but ... getting the shot matters more. The audience doesn't necessarily care about the extra heat distortion. It can sometimes be too much, and yes, crops magnify the heat distortion. In lower elevations and warmer weather it's worse but ... don't tell people not to use it. David Attenborough does not approve of your advice.
It's not gonna blow you away because consumer cameras are more than enough now. Just focus on improving your abilities and skills. If you're gonna vlog only on your neighborhood, then your ceiling of improvement will be very low.
I will get the R7 for my beautiful 100-400 II, I also hope Viltrox will release their 13mm 1.4 to R mount.
Hey Kasey.
I really need your help here please 🙏. I've been stuck between these 2 cameras for at least 2 months. Get the A7IV with 28-70mm kit lens for USD2880, or the A7C body alone for USD1630, leaving me with USD1200 for a lens to go with the A7C... Please help! These are both good deals. I need it mainly for video and it will be my first full frame, but my concern is also if my laptop will handle the 10 bit A7IV files. Should I just wait a bit for the next release? If you know of something coming, just say "wait" 😆. Thanks for all the guidance and interesting vids.
Trust me I still use a Canon 6D and it rocks!
Where is that 10mm lens at for an APS-C camera? On the front of my Nikon D7500.
If you increase the distance for the object you will have more disturbance in the light you receive in the sensor.
Is like looking at the star and planets in the sky. The light of the star in the sky is sparkling compared to the planets and this happens because of the distance of the object to the subject.
And the amount of the gases the light needs to pass makes the focal point not precise, so the image will look bad.
And the gases become more agitated with the heat, it's like looking on the highway and seeing the heatwave.
So... are you ever gonna challenge Jared P's realm of awkward tight t-shirts and semi bulging guns?
The autofocus alone is enough reason to upgrade from the 90d. However you have to wonder why they crippled the 90d in the first place and didn’t give it the autofocus system of the 7d MK 2?
Duh!! Because it's a cheaper camera!! You don't get leather seats and a moonroof in a base model car. No one questions that. What is it about cameras that make people think they should get all the features in the cheaper models? As it is, Canon is really good at letting some features slip down the line, like the AF from the R3 in this camera, and most of the features of the R5 in the R6.
@@alansach8437 I can’t believe you think this will have the same autofocus as the r3. Pretty funny
i am here for you scandalous seriousness and all the Toneh jabs and i was not disappointed 😂😂😂😂
I would have liked a APS-C camera to add to my R6 however I would have liked to see the R7 with the same layout as the R6. Someone needs to destroy that cripple hammer.
Why? Does the Sony APS-C cameras have the same layout as the full frame? Does the Nikon Z50 have the same layout as the Z7/9? Every manufacturer does this...
You get what you pay for. If you can get the same camera for 1500.00 as you can for 2500.00 or 3800.00, why by those? No one says a base model car is "crippled" because it doesn't have the features of a top of the line car. That's silly. This looks like a great wildlife camera.
@@alansach8437 what $2500 or $3800 camera does this compete with? It’s not on the same level as the R6 or anywhere close to the R5
@@alansach8437 what a load of shite.
Canon in their professional line up have always kept a very similar layout from the 1D to the 7D.
Canon know they have multi-disciplin shooters and being able to switch between bodies with ease is essential.
As for your analogy of car models you do not expect different trim of the same model to have controls in different places. You sound like a Canon fan boy trying to defend them rather than looking at it objectively.
I would like to be shooting portraits or landscapes with my R6 and then be able to pick up a R7 for wildlife and without thinking know where all the controls are. Is that really that difficult to grasp. Surely it would keep production costs down too if they shared the body.
If they were looking to dumb down the camera why give it 30fps?
@@michaelbell75 Canon have historically kept the controls very similar across their XD range why should the R range be any different?
“Side rant / right hand” is a great base for an Eminem bar.
Not sure why the Canon R7 vs R10 switching back-and-forth in the thumbnail appears to have varying sensor sizes. They are both APS-C. 22.2 x 14.8mm. (Canon's APS-C is 1.62x crop vs. Nikon's 1.52x)
bhp website spec says r7 pixel actual count 34.5 mp but effective is 32 mp i think that's why or simply cause ibis system is lay back abit and makes senor depth look bigger than it really is
IBIS mechanism.
It's same sensor size in the pictures, just that R7 has an IBIS frame for the sensor to have space to move.
Idk which one buy, the r7 or the xt4 (for video), bc the AF, and most of the Fuji lenses are kinda crap for video and the new ones are expensive
I’m excited to see your review on the secret lightweight Sony camera you already have. 😂😂😂
The RF kit lenses are crap. The R10 is a newbie body only. The R7, though, looks like the goods even with its imperfections.
"Where's the 10 mil? Not anywhere", you say? Not so fast, my friend. You forget the EF-S 10-18mm F/4.5-5.6. Adapt that, and boom: vlogging camera. A little slow, but stabilized and wide at 16-29mm equivalent. With the RF 100-500? Boom, a FF equivalent of 800mm with 32 full MP, instead of losing a bunch of MP with an R5 or R6 in crop mode. Think of the wildlife glory in 4K oversampled from 7K. And that's before adding a 1.4x extender (1120mm!!).
Fuji's biggest edge is the lens lineup. Canon need a fuller line of RF-S lenses like they have in the EF-S mount, from 10mm up to 200mm. Anything longer, you want at least the RF 100-400 budget zoom anyway.
Atmospheric interference is a problem with shooting from long distance with any camera and lens. It's physics. Regardless of the system and the longest available lens, you still have to get reasonably close to get acceptable image quality. You're getting very nice B-roll when you get close enough to the birds.
The R7's 4K/60 is disappointing. But you recorded this video in 4K/24, like I do. So the question is: is the 4K/60 a dealbreaker? Not for me, because I never shoot 4K/60. HD/240 would have been nice; but I use my R5 for 4K/120 so I still have that.
In conclusion: I pre-ordered the R7, mainly for birding and vlogging (buying the EF-S 10-18 too). There is no perfect camera, so you'll always have a channel. ;-D (P.S. - swans are jerks.)
No one wants to buy old lenses and adapt them. Thats a stupid idea
@@burritobrosvideos8060 not "no one". You. You're entitled to your opinion. You're not entitled to be rude about it. If you have a better idea for shooting much wider than 18mm on the R7 with kit that actually exists, feel free to share it.
I’m coming from Nikon D70 and I wanted the xt4 but just didn’t pull the trigger. I will buy the canon r7 which is still cheaper for the body by 200 dollars.
You can peer into someone's soul with that crop. I like it.
2 vids in one day 🎉🎉🎉
I've got the 7d and one eosR. The USB on the eos 7d allow me to conect my camera to my phone, do a little raw edit on any phone app and then printed on a instax printer. **Skate contest to give a photo to all skaters that come. Really cheap but everyone loves it. *Real use case I've done.
When you realize the new R cameras not have Magic Lantern and they could use the USB with a phone. Why? The USB conected to a Windows, Mac OS or Linux without problems. So the camera could do It but Canon prefer to sell you their cloud system, that's to make a full video on It cause the cloud app they sell on the eosR it's already discontinued.
So the new ecosistem or religion allow to move files from camera to phone by WiFi, first It kill the battery on both diveces. But then your only allowed to move raw photos into Apple phone, Android are forced to JPG.
Just remind that the eosR just have a single SD slot and iPhones don't have SD card reader. So Canon preffers you buy a expensive iPhone with large storage, pay the most expensive 4g data conection and a cloud to be able to save your data and then buy and carry external battery to charge your phone and camera.
What kind of deal are they making with Apple? Cause I call Canon several times, you can do It. They say the iPhone CPU have special tech that allow the camera send raw photos by WiFi and Android doesn't. That's lies to your own costumers the ones suporting your business. I can move and eddit raw files in my phone no problem and I don't want to buy and carry a laptop to do photo work, cause I need a powerful Desktop for video and that's my tool. Canon wants more tools a laptop, iPhone and atomos ninja cause they look the usb to conect to SSD and the sd card they use is not fast enough to save the files on time...... I'm done with Canon. They use same policy on printers.
I was thinking the R7 seemed like it was barely matching the X-T3 from the rumors but was surprised I didnt see anyone mentioning it. I didnt want to mention it as Id get roasted in vicious comments...
The edge I was speculating was the higher mp and better af. The mp difference isnt a game changer and its on older sensor tech than the X-T3... AF is always going to be the argument against fuji but I almost exclusively shoot on adapted vintage glass (poor not hippie) so it doesnt bother me.
What other APS-C camera has 4K 60p, IBIS, dual card slots, the best AF system on the market and can shoot 15fps mechanical/30 electronic? and all of it for $1,500. I'll wait....
@@michaelbell75 The Fuji X-T4... Released over two years ago and has a complete lens lineup (:
Also note reviews of the 4k60 and 1080p120 looking soft as shit on the R7....
@@ivanchao8872 XT-4 has garbage AF and can't shoot 30 fps electronic without a 1.2x cripple hammer crop. It only does 20fps. Oh and Canon has a more complete lineup. You can use RF and EF glass on the R7...Oh and I said for $1500 too. The X-T4 is an overpriced $1700 lol
@@michaelbell75 If ya wanna talk cripple hammer... R7's 4k60 is either subsampled (soft n shitty) or needs a 1.81x crop on top of the 1.6x canon apsc crop. Not to mention the rolling shutter again...
Meanwhile the XT4 is oversampled and again, over two years older.
Regarding lenses... You want to count old chunky adapted DSLR glass as part of the lens mount? Alongside expensive ass full frame glass? Id happily pay fuji X prices over Canon FF RF prices...
@@ivanchao8872 Wrong, go watch Dan Watson;s review on the R7 video specs. EF lenses may not be brand new, but at least a dozen of them kill any lens Fuji has ever released.
Freaking spot on. Canon just nosediving further and further.
What other APS-C camera has 4K 60p, IBIS, dual card slots, the best AF system on the market and can shoot 15fps mechanical/30 electronic? and all of it for $1,500. I'll wait....
@@michaelbell75 No idea, don't care. I am sure there is market for this, but how many customers are there for such new limited cumbersome system? AU, UK and Europe is ripped off price wise. This is going to be $2000 camera here. Add medium set of lenses, and you are near $5000 system quick. And so it is not that tempting, despite the specsheet.
Biggest cripple hammer 🔨 is they weather sealed the R7 , because they know it’s going outdoors! And then the sensor specific RF-s lenses aren’t weather sealed? WTF 🤬
Is there gna be a zv2 coming anytime soon?
The problem is that the R7 is good for photography, but not great for video. When it comes to video, if you want decent, problem-free 4K video, Canon want you to buy into their expensive Cinema EOS line cameras and the expensive RF-mount lenses that are available for the newest Cinema EOS cameras. I'm trying to find a hybrid camera that does video as well as it does stills, and such a beast really doesn't exist - yet.
I spent the whole video waiting for his girlfriend to come home and see him bolt out the door
Damn my man Derek might not be okay after that hammer hit