North By Northwest (1959) 4K Ultra HD VS Buray COMPARISON SIDE BY SIDE

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 28 янв 2025

Комментарии • 30

  • @trueCinemaniac
    @trueCinemaniac 13 дней назад +4

    Oh yeah, this 4K UHD is a stunner. Outshines the blu-ray in every comparison frame (not that the blu-ray wasn't excellent but 4K is magnificent). Thanks for yet another terrific comparison video!

    • @ricogomez4020
      @ricogomez4020 11 дней назад

      It may be a stunner compared to the bluray but not a stunner compared to other 1950s' 4k movies like 10 COMMANDMENTS, RIO BRAVO, THE SEACHERS which have no flaws.

    • @trueCinemaniac
      @trueCinemaniac 11 дней назад

      @@ricogomez4020 Can't wait to watch my Searchers 4K. I'm not a fan of 10 Commandments, but have Rio Bravo on order.

  • @doublebillmovies
    @doublebillmovies 11 дней назад +1

    As a first time watch of the film, the image on my 106" projector screen looked stunning. A very good restoration in deed.
    I watch the mono audio. I'll check the atmos out next time.
    I do wish people would stop asking for Atmos audio on everything. It drives the cost up for the studios and labels, which then get passed on to us.
    Most of the time, it barley make a difference anyway.
    Trevor

  • @travislogel8628
    @travislogel8628 13 дней назад +1

    Its a stunner of a disc. One of the best out there.

  • @stevedullum6777
    @stevedullum6777 11 дней назад +2

    I'm sure the detail is much better. Would expect that in 4K. But to me the color looks more natural on the blu-ray. Like the 4K color/contrast is too high. But I'm sure on an actual TV it looks great.

  • @MikeyMoNL
    @MikeyMoNL 13 дней назад +2

    So the main difference is a bit more saturation? 4K isn't as big an upgrade from Blu-ray as Blu-ray was from DVD

    • @TwinFlicks
      @TwinFlicks  13 дней назад +3

      Did you watch the video. I explained the differences. It much more then better Saturation

    • @LordHeath1972
      @LordHeath1972 13 дней назад

      Totally agree with you. Glad somebody else can see/say it.

    • @nacthenud
      @nacthenud 13 дней назад

      Very much not the case.

  • @tommorrissey4726
    @tommorrissey4726 10 дней назад

    Great review. The disc is almost worth buying exclusively for the audio track. Hermann's score sounds incredible.

  • @NicholasNathaniel7
    @NicholasNathaniel7 13 дней назад

    Excited to pick this one up, thank you for the review as always!

  • @georgeharris9873
    @georgeharris9873 13 дней назад +1

    I have this and yeah. A COMPLETE 5/5 for this Super High Definition version.

  • @NarcissismSurvivor
    @NarcissismSurvivor 12 дней назад +1

    I own both. The 4K transfer is certainly the weakest of the two.

  • @williamkirkham7357
    @williamkirkham7357 7 дней назад

    All the writing on the screen like signs and license plates looks sharper on then UHD.

  • @jonathanparle8429
    @jonathanparle8429 13 дней назад +2

    It seems to me that this is more about how it was processed - either the bluray colour grading is wrong and the 4K correct, the 4K correct and the bluray wrong, or both are wrong. Or to put it another way, there is absolutely no reason why the bluray couldn't have looked almost as good as the 4K from the start if they came from the same scan. The bluray looks quite washed out by comparison however I actually wonder whether it might have reflected the reality in front of the cameras at the time a little better than the 4K does. The 4K looks overdone to me.

  • @laurasands8322
    @laurasands8322 12 дней назад

    Will you be doing a video on To catch a thief, i was going to get the 4k as the bluray is very grainy, im in the UK and its on the HMV premium label I haven't seen a video yet on whether its worth buying.

  • @jim_wiley
    @jim_wiley 10 дней назад

    I have the 4k disk, a great upgrade from the Blu-ray. As for the hum, I did not experience it, maybe you had a defective disc or Atmos calibration is bit off in your av system

  • @Jimmie_Rudolfsson
    @Jimmie_Rudolfsson 13 дней назад

    Gotta watch it this weekend. Got my 4K release last week.

  • @gazog1
    @gazog1 11 дней назад

    My favourite Hitchcock film,,,,

  • @ricogomez4020
    @ricogomez4020 13 дней назад +2

    It's not perfect and the scene I have a problem with is the crop duster scene where the road looks brown instead of what a road should look like. You can see on the bluray it looks dark gray but on 4k it looks too brown. Other 1950s' 4k look flawless like RIO BRAVO, THE SEARCHERS, 10 COMMANDMENTS.

  • @LordHeath1972
    @LordHeath1972 13 дней назад +3

    The difference between DVD > Blu Ray is very significant in most cases, but I honestly think the difference between Blu Ray > 4K is quite minimal. Just my opinion. Recently bought Psycho on 4K and it looks maybe 5% better than the Blu Ray?

    • @nacthenud
      @nacthenud 13 дней назад

      A lot of it depends on a) how well your TV handles HDR and b) how big the screen is. On a 55” TV that doesn’t really make the most of HDR, the 4K disc won’t make much of a difference. On a 77” OLED, the differences can be transformative.

    • @paulconway384
      @paulconway384 12 дней назад +1

      Psycho looks better on BluRay. It looks brighter 😁

    • @PowerfulLeadahYas-Yas
      @PowerfulLeadahYas-Yas 18 часов назад

      4k TVs have built in "4k upscaler" processors which artificially enhance 1080 images into 4k images (by multiplying and interpolating pixels). While upscaled 1080 is not real 4k, it still looks really good. Some upscalers are better than others - obviously more expensive TVs have better upscaling processors. To truly compare 4k to 1080 you'd need to watch the film on both large screen 4k TV and large screen 1080 TV. You will see the difference in sharpness between the 4k TV and the 1080 TV.
      4k blu rays are best appreciated on large top of line screens (OLED) with Dolbyvision and 7.1 surround audio system. Otherwise, yeah, upscaled 1080 blu rays are fine for most viewing conditions.

  • @tubinonyou
    @tubinonyou 8 дней назад

    Based on your comparison screenshots, the Blu-ray looks far more natural to me. The UHD does look quite oversaturated to me. I'm watching your RUclips video on my LG OLED for reference.

  • @tinderbox218
    @tinderbox218 12 дней назад +1

    Warner Bros adds sound effects??? Ugh
    Where do they get off making content changes to a Hitchcock film?

    • @TwinFlicks
      @TwinFlicks  12 дней назад

      Its WB. They do it constantly with their remixed Atmos tracks

  • @notsorandumusername
    @notsorandumusername 11 дней назад +1

    Thank god Hitchcock filmed in VistaVision for this one. It looks stunning and probably better today than it did back then in the cinema. And it's such a great movie, a big inspiration for the James Bond movies that started just three years later. Hitchcock really was as his zenith back then, directing Vertigo the year previous and Psycho the year afterwards. Three very different movies, all masterpieces, all highly influential, all bona fide classics nowadays. And that's not even including Rear Window, The Birds, Rebecca, Foreign Correspondent, The Lady Vanishes, Rope, or Frenzy.

  • @notthisguyagain8557
    @notthisguyagain8557 13 дней назад

    Watched this over the snowy weekend and i gotta say this movie looks absolutely fantastic! Technicolor in 4k🤤... with hdr and the sound was awesome.
    I'd give the picture a 10/10
    Sound 8/10
    Story 7/10