That's a fine talk. I'm hoping some folks at Cornell can consider this point: The year is 2122 and you're a scientist reading about a 2.2 kiloyear event, that's 2,200 years BP (before present). First you have to look up when that report was written. What narcissistic navel-gazing terminology by climate scientists as if now is the only thing that really matters when writing the report. For you, in 2122, it's the 2.316 kiloyear event because that one was written in 2006, hypothetically. Not a very smart method of dating things. We need to change that. Just state years plainly, not deltas.
기후학과 기후변화 듣는 사람 나와라
That's a fine talk. I'm hoping some folks at Cornell can consider this point: The year is 2122 and you're a scientist reading about a 2.2 kiloyear event, that's 2,200 years BP (before present). First you have to look up when that report was written. What narcissistic navel-gazing terminology by climate scientists as if now is the only thing that really matters when writing the report. For you, in 2122, it's the 2.316 kiloyear event because that one was written in 2006, hypothetically. Not a very smart method of dating things. We need to change that. Just state years plainly, not deltas.
You have to find the source date and do the math to find out it was simply ~194 BC