Takumar vs Pentax-M, thorium vs non-thorium. Which 50mm f1.4 lens is better? (Radioactive lens)

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 29 сен 2024
  • A quick comparison between two fast 50mm lenses from Pentax. The SMC Takumar (1972 - 1975) contains thorium and thus is radioactive. Does this make the lens better than the later Pentax-M version? I did a quick test to see which lens performed better.
    Spoiler: performance is the same, only because of thorium the Takumar is much "warmer"

Комментарии • 14

  • @frontiergibberish
    @frontiergibberish Год назад +5

    You can also get rid of the yellowing by leaving the lens to soak up sunlight for a while (or so it's said, haven't had to try it out for myself). Just wrap the other end of the lens in some tin foil so it doesn't start a fire...
    Also, before anyone asks, no, the radioactiveness isn't enough to be dangerous. Unless you smash the glass and inhale it, but you wouldn't do that to normal glass either, so...

    • @cruzdesangre2850
      @cruzdesangre2850 10 месяцев назад +1

      I'd recommend using a UV lamp. Even the cheap 395nm ones work, but I suppose a 365nm would work even better. I cleaned mine with a 395nm one and it was almost perfect after two or three days.😊

  • @MrGibsonguy335
    @MrGibsonguy335 3 месяца назад

    I have the SMC PENTAX lens just like the lens on the right in your video. However when removed from the camera the front elements (stopped down to f 22) have a distinct blue cast while the rear elements consistently show a distinct amber cast. As I understand it, the thoriated lens usually ends up in the rear element group. I have not tested my lens with a geiger counter as of yet but plan to very soon. I also have a MC W ROKKOR-X SI 28mm f2.5 lens with a very distinct amber tone. While Pentax made a long list of lenses using thoriated glass, Minolta only made a couple including the 28mm f2.5.

  • @stes5429
    @stes5429 3 месяца назад

    All those yellowhiing should be corrected with UV lights, then the differences even out

  • @robertbirnbach2312
    @robertbirnbach2312 Год назад +3

    Interesting I have a 7-element and an 8-element version of the 1.4 and cant really tell much if any difference between those 2 lens either

  • @GrumpyTim
    @GrumpyTim Год назад +4

    Hi ohjajohh, I'm kind of surprised just how similar the results are, once you've got past the obvious colour shift. Great comparison video, and some nice shots too - love the night time shots across the sea - I could never get tired of seeing that view.

    • @ohjajohh
      @ohjajohh  Год назад +1

      Hi Tim, thanks for watching. I was also surprised to see that apart from the colour difference they really seemed to perform similar.
      I live at the Dutch coast, so seeing the sea and ships feels normal to me. :)

  • @FlashMediaStudiosTV
    @FlashMediaStudiosTV Год назад +2

    Nice. Whats the difference in the price ?

    • @ohjajohh
      @ohjajohh  Год назад +1

      I think on average the Pentax is around $75 bucks and the Takumar usually goes for around $100

  • @nanniejat3240
    @nanniejat3240 Год назад +1

    Pentax-M more beautiful

  • @InterkosmosStudios
    @InterkosmosStudios 11 месяцев назад

    Very interesting video. Thanks for sharing. Congrats! I subscribed to the channel!

  • @damiendehorn6350
    @damiendehorn6350 Год назад +1

    Quick question, what camera and settings did you use? Thanks.

    • @ohjajohh
      @ohjajohh  Год назад +1

      Sony A7iii and color temperature at 5500. Iso is always at 100 when I'm outdoor. Shutter time varied per scene, but for both lenses I used the exact same shutter speed.

    • @damiendehorn6350
      @damiendehorn6350 Год назад

      @@ohjajohh Thank you for the prompt reply.