8 Element VS 7 Element - TAKUMAR 50mm F/1.4
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 8 июл 2024
- #PlanarKiller#SuperTakumar50mm#withme
In this video I take a look at the Pentax Super Takumar 50mm F/1.4 8 element "Planar Killer" and compare it to the "HOTTER" younger sibling, the SUPER Multi-Coated Takumar 50mm F1.4 to see what ALL the fuss is about.
**BUY THE 8 ELEMENT 50mm HERE: ebay.to/2WQASAZ
**BUY THE 7 ELEMENT SMC 50 HERE: ebay.to/3dHIlYU
DL Link to RAW Files for Review:
7 Element "Radioactive" SMC Takumar: geni.us/BM2gY
8 Element "Non Radioactive" SM Takumar: geni.us/VbydTq6
MUSIC FOR YOUR VIDEOS [FREE TRIAL]: share.epidemicsound.com/markho...
VINTAGE LENS KIT: bit.ly/2MxdD8d
VINTAGE LENS ADAPTERS
FOTODIOX M42 - E (Sony): geni.us/SonyM42
FOTODIOX PRO M42-EOS (Canon): geni.us/M42Canon
FOTODIOX PRO M42 - F (Nikon): geni.us/M42Nikon
FOTODIOX PRO M42-Micro 4/3: geni.us/M42MFT
MY PRODUCTION GEAR
Lumix S1H: geni.us/LumixS1HCamera
Sony A7SII: geni.us/M42MFT
Wandrd Prvke Backpack: geni.us/WANDRDPRVK21L
Sony 16-35 F4: geni.us/SonyZeiss1635F4
ROV PRO Everyday Slider: geni.us/ROVPRO
Aperture 120DII: geni.us/Aputure120DII
Aperture Lightdome II: geni.us/LiteDome2
Hoodman Lens Hood: geni.us/LensHood
LitraTorch: geni.us/LitraT
Litra Pro: geni.us/LitraP
BEST Tripod: geni.us/BestPod
Microphone: geni.us/MarkMic
TOO Expensive Battery Grip: geni.us/A7Grip
Hobby Matt: geni.us/hobbymatt
FIND ME ONLINE:
IG: / mholtze
TWITTER: / markholtze
DISCLAIMERS:
Some of these links have an affiliate code, if you purchase gear with these links I will receive a small commission at no additional cost to you. Thank you!
0:00 - Introduction
0:29 - Super Takumar Physical Lens Details
1:00 - 8 Elements and 7 Element Physical Differences
3:15 - Image Samples
I can't pick which one I like more, the 7 element is better "value", but the 8 being the collector piece bumps it up in an unfair way that doesn't really resonate in the photo's. What do you guys think? Full RAW files linked in the description, check them out for a closer look at the images.
Mark Holtze
My infra red focus mark is on the left but it’s written A and M so now I’m confused whether it’s 8 elements or 7 😩
I've always heard the 7 element tak is sharper, specially the SMC one, but I gotta say that in this test, the 8 element looks a tiny bit sharper. However, I do feel the CA is worst with the older version too, so....I'd call it a tie
@@shinzychan5117 I think it's just a 7 element one. However, a "hybrid" version does exist, is has the infra red focus mark to the right, the A and M marks are there too, but the rear element doesn't protrude as it does in the 8 element version.
OH and I like the 7 element more. creamier background, less aberration and slightly more fine detail. At least to my eyes.
I had once the 7 el SMC version, but was disappointed. Between f1,4 and f2,8 the sharpness was unacceptable for my taste. Even at f5,6-8, was outperformed by my Sup. Tak 35mm f3,5. Probably was a defective one.
I remember watching this during the "dark times" and really enjoying it. Nice to come back to it in better days, decided to treat myself to a 7 element version! I clearly didn't listen to your no more takumars mantra at the end ha.
😆 ya you can’t really go wrong with any of the Tak 50’s…auto to SMC ;) enjoy the lens mate!
Great Job! My favourite video you've done so far. I think a lot of people appreciate this brief overview/comparison.
Loved this episode! Your interior test / comparison shots are super creative so this was just as good as any other video if not better in some ways due to the controlled environment throughout!
Thanks mate, was running around with the Re-Housed Helios 44-2 for those shots. Such a graet lens.
Beautiful content as always. ❤️ It's awesome watching how your self presentation evolves throughout these videos
Thanks Johny, it's an evolution I think. I learn a lot in every video and try to cut out what doesn't work and include what does.
There were 4 variants of these lenses. There were two "Super Takumar" versions, early with 8 elements, later with 7 elements, both labeled as "Super Takumar". The older, 8-element version was non-radioactive, while all the later versions used thoriated (radioactive) glass. The lens on the left here is the third version, Super-Multi-Coated Takumar, released after the 7-element "Super Takumar". The Super-Multi-Coated Takumar was then replaced by SMC Takumar. Aside from the first 8-element version, they were all radioactive.
Michael M. They seemed to have kept the radiated design through to the Pentax K lenses. They turn a different color than yellow though, so it’s tricky to spot color shift with multi-coating.
VeloRydr, all SMC Tak’s have a blue green coating.
Art Tafil yes, and the thoriated rear element will show a different type of discoloration because of the difference in multi-coating. My point, is that all the 50mm 1.4 lenses remained radiated through to the SMC Pentax-K design.
@@JP1050x but were the early 8 super taks 1.4 radioactive with thorium or not?.
@@dzava 8 element version was not known to be thoriated, so it should not be prone to color change, unlike all other Takumar 50/1.4 lenses.
I’ve got the 7, picked it up for $45 USD on EBay + $5 shipping. Absolutely fantastic on my Fuji XE2. So compact, so easy to shoot. My go-to lens for kid photos and daily walkabouts. You first made a video about them a while back, which inspired me to get it. Thanks!
That 50 I think was one of my first lens reviews ehehe. I remember at the time thinking how am I going to top Jamaica for a lens review?
The comparison that I've been wainting for a long time!
Just had to move it to 3:00pm :( hope you can still make it!)
@@MarkHoltze I've waited some years for this, waiting a few more hours is not a problem. Thanks in advance for this video!
Your lens videos are butter smooth Mark. You did well being confined to the house.
Man I can’t get enough of this channel!!
Glad you're enjoying it mate! Nice to share a space with those who love this stuff as well!
I have the 7-element Super Tak, and I love it! Incredible lens for the price and history! Great video as always Mark!
Thanks mate! Ya the 7 is sitll one of the best value lenses out there. Such a nice feeling and looking lens. I had heard so much about the 8 element I figured after so long i should just get one when an opportunity presented itself. Hope you're keeping safe during these times mate.
Second time watching. It’s crazy how I love how you incorporate visuals, music and your commentary together. Watching your videos like it’s my online class. Hope you don’t mind☺️
Not at all, going to do a video on that process I think shortly I think!
Mark Holtze great
Brilliant vid, I love your style so natural and knowledgeable.
Thanks mate! Appreciate you hanging out!
Another banger!!!!!!! Thank you for the awesome comparison!!!!! Have a great weekend!!!!
Thanks Kyle! You too mate!
Fantastic comparison video! I just bought an EBay 7 element and can't wait to use it. I will however keep my eye open for the 8 element versions at the markets.
Thank you for your reviews. Glad I found your channel.
Thanks for being here Richard :)
Got the 8 elements, have not tested soo much yet but I will soon. Love your videos, great work man!
Thanks Thomas! I want to get more use out of this lens as well, recently got it and definitely need to use it a bunch more.
Can't wait to see this!
Another good one! Thanks Mark!
Thanks James!
Mark, I freaking love your content. I recently bought a Helios 44-2 and am in LOVE. All because of your videos. I have been eyeing the Super Takumar for awhile now. After watching this video for the 3rd time, I think I'm ready to commit. Keep kicking butt!
Lol! It won’t disappoint! I’m apologize to your wallet! ✊
@@MarkHoltze it already resents you my friend 😭
Lol mine too
I've had the 7 element lens for about 40+ years, and relatively recently decided to fix the colour degradation. Exposure to UV light does it, if you use sunlight you need to keep the lens cool - it will also take several weeks.
You did it once again, terrific video! I recently bought the 8 element version so cheap that I still can't believe it, now I want the 7 element SMC because...well, I have issues lol. The thing that strikes me the most is that everyone says the 8 element is not radioactive, however if you look at it, the glass definitely has a yellow tint to it. I'm barely starting my Takumar journey, I've always been a Nikkor guy, but I gotta say, this is addictive. Take care Mark!
Thanks mate, ya I saw some mention that the older 8 elements will yellow a bit, but was mentioned that it wasn't due to thorium...again it's tough to get a verifiable source on this and annotating sources is also super tricky...it's always a guy who's heard it who read it who knows a guy who knows lol.
One of the best video you made, i love when you make informative video
I try to make all my videos informative...either by telling directly or by showing to help educate your understanding.
Thanks for the support mate
@@MarkHoltze BTW i find that the S1 is the perfect fit for the takumar. 👍👍👍👍
You made a cinematic lens review without the use of 120 or 60p, I love those out of focus foreground shots you do! I would love a video on that! Well done!
120 makes me sleepy ;) good for some things, but not my style generally.
Thank you Mark for being a driving force and inspiration to my photography. I recently acquired the 8element f1.4, absolute dream.
Ooh yess I almost forgot, I acquired a Konica 40mm f1.8 an unusually charming pancake.
Fantastic! ✊
Loved seeing “parsec” on the b-roll but undecided in which I prefer but at a push the 8 element would be my choice.
The cleaner natural image I think is what sold me on it. The 7 you have to bump the exposure by 1/3 of a stop because the yellowing impacts the light transmission too. 7 is still fantastic value and you can reverse the yellowing with UV light exposure.
The 8 though, 1960's and it's the "planar killer" so that would be my ultimate choice.
been looking to get one, and this video (BTW... awesome job!) helps a lot to chose. leaning heavy now to 7 elements as I like the character more. Thank you
Love it!!! Great review!!! Always like your tone!
For you, it is so hard to pick one to like more.
For me, I would say the 7 element is a better choice since I only have the 7!
Stay healthy everyone!
The 7 is the smartest choice for sure.
I literally bought the lens on the right in excellent shape for $60usd with an ef adapter yesterday and then i see this video when i wake up the next day haha. can't wait to see this!
That's AMAAAAZING! You got a great deal on that mate!
Thanks mate! Just getting into vintage lenses and this was a great video. ❤
✊
I've only got the 7 element so I've no basis for comparison. Was fun to see yours.
There's a sweet spot not talked about enough. It's the SMC Takumar 50mm 1.4 with 8 blades. Mine arrived today, and typically, you're home, the light is fading, you're aiming it wide open at ISO 200 hopefully on an X-H1 with IBIS, checking out wide open sharpness along with living room bokeh. Maybe you got lucky and found the right combo. I had placed my watch on my knee to see if I could focus on it. It turned out to be my foreground bokeh while I focused on a yellow can in the background.Big beautiful soft balls floating in the foreground instead of the background. It only took me moments to realize the lens was sharper wide open than my Rollei Planar C.Z. 50mm 1.8 . (also on a converter to Fuji.) What kills me, is the lens looks brand new inside and out. Mint. $120 bucks. And it has that Multi Coating....I may need to buy a Pentax body....but first, it's dark, so I think I'll go stand in traffic! And by the way, my 8 element says Auto (in white,and Man.(In red)and the little red mark IS to the left of the 4. And it has the soft (rubber) focusing wheel. So, THIS lens needs to be talked about. By the way, I think YOU have it at 3:22. Your lens number, 63963655, is about a million higher than mine. I think I counted 8 blades in it.
last year lucky i found one 8 Element in good condition but the aputure ring lost control, but i was able to open it up found the small fault and fixed it up, very happy now.
Successful surgery! Nicely done!
Thank you very much. I enjoy your vintage lens videos. Recently I bought a Zenit Helios 44 58mm for 40 €. Such a beautiful lens. On my 5D Mark 2 it works very good beside the 50 mm Pentacon 1.8. I can enjoy photography a it is when all is manual.
Happy to hear that Julian, do you ever have issues with old lenses and your DSLR?
@@MarkHoltze Thank you, Mark. Yes, with the Pentacon. If I focus to infinity the rear lens reaches too much in the camera so the mirror can't swing up. I move the focus ring just a little bit in the opposite direction and it fits again :)
Brilliant stuff - thanks!
Great video as always 👌🏼
Thanks Jonny!
This quarantine got me so messed up I missed your video! Dude these lenses are awesome! Definitely a great combo with your S1H.
ALl good man, hopefully you're doing well mate. You back in Michigan for the time being?
@@MarkHoltze Thanks! Hope you are doing well too! I actually am. Came back to be with my family a few weeks ago before things got really bad. Not sure if you saw my latest video but I am going to be posting some more videos very soon! Im trying to turn lemons into lemonade.
Radioactive lenses are so cool, I really like the yellow tint of their front glass, dangerously charming. ☠️
The yellow one in this photo is actually the “clean” lens. When you look inside the one on the left you can see the yellow tint, how it reflects a more burgundy hue than the one on the left. The super multi coating is my guess.
Yifan Tang the thoriated elements are only found in the rear group. The front element is coated with a really cool reflective yellow tint! The yellow coating is easy to scratch though... don’t ask me how I know :(.
Like a beautiful woman with AIDS.
@@barrycohen311 21 micro-sieverts per hour on the one I tested. Carried in a pocket for a day trip would be a couple x-rays worth of gamma. That's why I prefer the 8 element.
Actually, I remembered wrong. It was 3.6 uS from the front and 15 micro-sieverts from the back. For me it's easily worth the extra for the 8 element non-rad lens.
I think I've tried all versions ! They are all awesome and the 55mm f1.8 is a sleeper.
After getting the Contax 50mm f1.4 I sold all the Pentax lenses. Same excellent build quality and feel, but more contrast and sharpness.
Ya the Contax lenses also have some magic pixie dust too. Been building up my set, Takumar's will always be my first love, but it's the consistent colour that has me using my Contax for my professional video work.
I've heard so many people say the 55.1.8 is great, i don't doubt it. That 55mm focal length is magic in of itself.
Would you recommend the Carl Zeiss Contax Planar 50mm 1.7 for Yashica over the Super Takumar 50mm 1.4?
Found the eight element 50mm f1.4 SUPER TAKUMAR in a second hand shed, ( attached to the ASAHI- PENTAX SPOTMATIC) four month ago. I am getting good colours and fine BOUKET .
You prob got it for a good price too didnt you? :)
great one, many thanks!
Thank you mate!
Nice review!
Thanks Richard.
"No more Takumars." Bwaa-haa-haa! They're addictive, man! Especially when you also have a Spotmatic and like to shoot film as well.
Truth!!!
Just ordered my second Takumar... Thank you so much for the inspiration. 🤣👍🏻
I've recently read a lot about the legendary skateboard and music photographer Glen Friedman, who was a true passionate Pentax user: that's probably one of the reasons I like his style so much
Glen is a legend, Pentax...while not as hip as Canon and Sony today, still produce some fantastic gear....they're just so off the radar it's kind of weird.
@@MarkHoltze true, nowadays not too many people are using Pentax cameras and lenses. It's not easy to understand why: maybe marketing, maybe Ricoh acquisition or maybe product design (think about how could be good a camera whose design reminds to a Spotmatic or a K1000)
Cannot remember the lens that was on My Asahi Pentax in the1960's but also cannot remember any disappointments. Recently picked up 50mm Super-multi-coated 1.4 /7 element in mint condition that I am using on a Nikon D850 have to admit that it is fast becoming My favoured go to lens, closeup/ macro and a bit of portrait. Price -quality comparison with My Nikkor lens there is none.
I have both these lenses and they’re both lovely bits of glass but despite all of their similarities there certainly are differences between, really looking forwards to watching this to see if your copies echo the results of mine, excellent!!!
Found it like splitting hairs really, one major difference in images is immediately apparent though ;)
@@MarkHoltze Colour? One of mine has a lot of yellow'ing unless I leave it out in the sunshine, however, I rather the like the warmth it brings :)
I know, I know... I will just have to wait and see at 3pm! :)
Hahaa, "No more Takumars.... [for now]"
FOR NOW! lol...very important ;)
Do you have SMC Takumar 15mm F/3.5 aspherical? Same as this 8 element 50 - money lost on each copy, limited production run, can distinguish from standard, 'spherical' version by markings on distance scale... another piece of Asahi Optical history.
@@MarkHoltze Last Takumar? I own the 28mm f3.5 M42, the 28mm f3.5 K-mount (better!), the 50mm f1.4, the 85mm f1.8 (my favorite!) and the 135mm f2.5 (excellent!). That 135mm f2.5 I'd strongly recommend you to trade your f3.5 for; maybe THAT could be your last Takumar then ( for a while) 😀. Too bad you brought this video just ahead of me looking for the 8-elements 50mm, now prices will go up even more 😉
My wife said that to me. Now I have 15 of them. If you do not have a Tele-Takumar 200mm preset ... that should be your next one. Incredible bokeh and super sharp.
I like these so much, I have both! They're both pretty much unbeatable, even by modern standards imo. I'm always floored by how nice the negatives look when I use these with film. Yeah, the radioactive one definitely has a more yellow tint. Actually very useful with films that have a cooler white balance, like Ektachrome. Almost a built in warming filter.
I blame your videos for my Pentax M42 mount addiction! :-)
Only need the 85mm now, and I'm done.. ish.
Built in warming filter exactly lol. The 85 is golden mate, you'll love it. It's THE PERFECT size and balance, it's just fantastic.
@@MarkHoltze Yeah, I really want that 85mm... Off to ebay!😄
I love my hot 7 element esp since I found it handed down to me unknowingly along with a 20mm/3.5 super tak and a 200mm super tak. Given the age of both I'm in favor or the 7 element, which sort of shows it's vintage age and nature with the color change. There are plenty more vintage and new lens that can accurately reproduce color.
I love that colour cast as well.
Thumbs up for funky jazz soundtrack!
🎶 🎼 🎵
nice one mate, just got my takumar 300mm this week and have started testing.
300mm? The long telephoto's are something I need to get into.
Mark Holtze it’s a big lens on the m50 😂
Solid work.
Thanks Allen! Appreciate your time mate, stay safe.
I use the 55mm 1.8 lens. It is radioactive. I love the glass. I also use my 58mm Rokkor 1.4 Radioactive lens and I like it just a tad better than the Takumar because it is a fast lens. I have a 58mm Canon 1.2 but its a softie wide open. Nice but too soft to get used much. My favorite 55mm is my Sony Zeiss 1.8 I use all the time now on my Sony A7rIV. But I digress. The Takumar glass is rock solid. Can't go wrong. I do like the old radioactive glass. Excellent portrait glass. The 58mm Rokkor is the best for that.
The 58mm focal length might be my fav focal length for portraits. A bit tighter than the 50, but not as tight as the 85, it's a nice balance! Rokkor's I hear wonderful things about.
Great video!!!
I totally agree with you. It's near impossible to spot the difference between the two lenses - the the obvious exception of that colour shift. I love the warm tones created in the 7 element, but if I was looking to buy for professional purposes, I'd have to get the 8 element to save time on editing. Ace video man. Catching up on your content from the last few weeks now!
I was hoping it would be a little more apparent but, it’s like looking at the same shot twice. Only CA difference I see is in XL1 shot, wide open the purple fringing is more apparent. Could he the thorium is doing it’s trick on the 7 in that same shot, or it could just be the color shifting making it less pronounced...not sure.
I have the luxury of having no better 50 mm lens than my Super Takumar, 50 mm; f:1.4; seven elements. I adore it, the sharpness and IQ is superb. Handling is excellent, and it does not suffer from radio active matter.
Funny I’ve been listing after the 8 element design but after watching your vid I much prefer the “cheaper” version. Love that yellow tint!
Ya, much cheaper too! Enjoy, good luck in your search!
Recently found a Pentax Spotmatic with the 7 element lens while going through my dads boxed up items. Any recommendations on where I could have the lens serviced? Thanks in advance!
Your 8 element is noticeably sharper. This may be sample variation, but I was surprised you didn't mention this. The 8 doesn't have to be too painful to buy; I paid $100 for mine, and the only flaw is a slightly sticky/rough aperture ring
Ya market varies for sure. One week non available other tons. It’s literally week to week.
I read long time ago about how to turn the thorium yellow element back to white. You have to put a mirror beneath the lens whit caps taken off and place it under the sun for a day or more, depending of how neutral you want the lens to become. Apparently sunlight clears the yellow tint. It might be UV lighth and then you could use an UV lamp, but I'm not sure though...
THIS is the way!
as a word of caution, doing this under a hot sun might cause the oil on the aperture blades to ooze out onto your glass, good luck getting that off if it happens.
The difficulty is telling the Super Tak 7 and 8 element lenses apart. The Super-Multi-Coated variants (and very late Super-Tak) can be told apart by the aperture signalling arm on the rear of the lens, which the 8-element never had.
I don't use my Super Tak with colour film because I know I'll never get the tint out. On the other hand, at least one of the presets on my Pentax K-5 corrects for it well enough and minimizes the work I might have to do in post.
I can manually correct the colour balance when I shift the white balance by eye, it's very easy to do to the raw files though. Film ya, be a bit trickier.
I bought my 7 element version in 1975 along with a Spotmatic F; I still own/use both. I am curious about M42 to Fuji X lens adapters for my late model 50/1.4 which has an aperture feedback link for the Spotmatic full-aperture meter. I have a couple of M42 Fotodiox adapters but they will not work with my Tak because the aforementioned link prevents the lens from screwing all the way into the adapter. Anyone know of a Fuji X mount adapter that works with this lens?
Hi great vid. Using it with an adaptor on a digital camera wont show you much difference . I use this lens on my Pentax Spotmatic F . When used in a film camera the sharpness at F2 to Ff8 is more evident. I know the fashion now is to shoot wide open all the time for the shallow dept of field and the digital sensors can handle that . When using the 8 element at say 5.6 the extra elements really help sharpen the image which would be a concern say if you had to enlarge a 35mm negatives . Photographers had different film stocks most topped out at 800 iso for years until 3200 iso film stock appeared so the F1.4 could be used to let more light in but had its downsides. The lens was the key when shooting film . I use vintage lenses on my Fuji gear I love them . I guess what I’m saying is now everyone wants super fast lenses to shoot wide open . Back then it was looking for sharp lenses for film stocks shooting wide open had its problems a lot of work was shot at f4 or f3.5 . Great content.
May I ask what m42 to Fuji adapter you use, and if you feel comfortable recommending it?
Also, to know if you have an 8 or 7 element, hold it up against a light. You can see tiny little lens flares. Count them.
That's cool! ! Thanks
You make it hard for me to want to do more on my RUclips channel cause.......your videos are so good!!! Fun to see what you have kicking around. My God, the Canon XL1 was my first 'real camera'. 3CCD don't you know! Nespresso too! My sister showed me that magic! Anyway, I think a good review video would be to compare different aperture designs. To be honest, I fail to see why any lens manufacturer makes anything less than 9 blades or more. I really don't care for hexagon bokeh. I just love smooth creamy backgrounds from round apertures. I really don't like oval bokeh. Don't see the fuss over that. I almost don't even watch reviews when I see 8 blades or less. Yes, that's how ill I have become with yummy goodness like the Jupiter and Meyers that have 13 or 15 blade apertures. Anywho.......doesn't matter what I think. Just thought it would make a great review video.
DO MORE! I need to do more too, was nice banging off two this week, locked in and on a hiatus week on the show so...had to stay busy and keep sane for sure.
Oval Bokeh I don't mind so much from anamorphs, I like it much better than those flares that's for sure. But like any of this stuff, it's all a matter of opinion.
That was a fun video.
Glad you liked it mate.
0:30 Nothing is centered on the table! D:
Just kidding, amazing video as always! :)
you're right! Man I need to fix that! Next time, expect things to be centered ;)
I have a pristine copy of the 8 element version. I got it with it's original leather case, caps and hood. I use it both on my Sony bodies as well as on a Pentax Spotmatic. I believe this lens really shines with Black & White as well as low light photography. I also found for video work the 8 element is easier to color grade. I honestly prefer the 8 element hands down over the 7.
The 8 wasy easier to grade, especially when using other lenses (which I always do)...just make sure white balance is good and copy and paste my grade.
Wicked you got all the goodies with it, I'd love to see the box it came in....all long gone i suspect.
I'm using my 8-element version on a Canon body modified to shoot deep b&w infrared. It really shines and there is no central hot spot like with some of my Canon L glass. I bought this lens and Spotmatic in Vietnam in 1965. Lots of memories!
Quick update on my 50mm 7 element.
It was quite yellow, very dusty on the inside with spots that looked like mold.
Opened it up, cleaned it.
Put it in the sun for 5 days straight. It's now completely clear. The white balance adjustment between the before and after was more than 1000. So you can imagine what a difference in f-stop that would be.
I'm now doing the same with my 35mm, which looked fine before. But now, compared to my 50mm, I can see the orange difference. I put it in the sun today the white balance adjustment came in at 3650.
It will be interesting to see the difference of one day.
Ya, all you need to do! How was the open heart surgery as I like to put it ?
@@MarkHoltze opening this lens was super easy. All you need is a lens tool. Hard for even me to screw it up.
The 7 elements that you have is the SMC version so it will have 8 blades, the “super” version will have 6 blades like the 8 elements
I think about buying 7 element version for my fuji and about radiation a little bit too...but i love images from it)
Thanks for your vids, thay are so inpspiring)))
Radiation always makes people feel weird, i get it.
Vladimir Fominykh I’ve got the 7 version and it is excellent on my Fuji xe2. Fits fine on my xt2, but it is more natural on the xe2.
Hey I was thinking about picking up the Takumar SMC f/4 300mm for a video project. Have you used it?
When I did a direct comparison, I've noticed that the 7-element is much sharper in the corners +it has less vignetting and less purple fringing. The sharpness in the center was about the same. The biggest difference is the color rendition.
I took a photo of my grid lines from my hobby matt but didn't notice the difference in sharpness at the corners wide open. It's the main reason I cut that part out of the video as it was like looking at the same image, only one with different colour balance.
Definitely noticed more CA wide open on the 8 in the XL1 camera shot you can see it halo the eye piece of the camera in a more direct way than the 7. Stopping down to F/4 both lenses were pretty clean of CA.
Mark Holtze Maybe it was my copy, but my 8-element takumar was much less sharp in the corners. I made shots at different apertures through the window and there was a tree in the corner of the frame. The brunches were all blurred.
Mark Holtze I really don’t know why the 8 element version has that superior reputation. It is a good lens, but the 7-element versions are better to my opinion. Such a gorgeous mechanical piece of art! It was clearly made with love and attention. Very pleasant to use. Still regret selling it. By the way, I don’t recommend cleaning the yellow-brown tint with UV light. It does the job, but it kills some magic. The rear element turns back to magenta from brown and becomes more clear, but the bokeh looses that magic artistic plasticity. The colors become more natural, but the brownish tint turns to light yellowish. I liked the brownish tint with magical plasticity more:)
Great video.. Like always 👏
I have this 2 versions.. But want wider angle
20/24/28 or 35....good options.
A very nice comparison. However, you have to keep in mind that the 8-element has 6 aperture blades, the third and fourth versions have 8 aperture blades. The "Super Takumar" 7-element has 6 aperture blades just like the "Super Takumar" 8-element Super Takumar. Anyway they are great lenses.
Good point! I should have made clear I'm comparing the version I have vs ones that exist. Good to know though mate, thanks for that additional info!
🍿
Have you ever mounted these lenses to a canon dslr like canon 5d or 6d? I've heard that there are issues with these lenses hitting the mirror of a canon fullf frame camera. Most of my cameras are full frame canon and I have mix feelings on getting this lens.
6:15...I'm just getting started bro!
Awesome!
Interesting. I think I prefer the 7 element version. Much warmer colours for the reasons you mentioned. I guess this shows that sometimes internet hype isn’t always warranted
I get it if you feel uncomfortable with (harmless) radiation levels on the 7, or just want the actual "planar killer"...but optically.........not much of a difference to warrant the price difference. Reputation and scarcity goes a long way in the collectors field though.
Only issue i don't love is the lack of light that comes through the thoriated glass that's aged. It was about 1/3 of a stop difference with same shooting settings, I always had to bump up the shutter a bit to compensated with same lighting levels.
Mark Holtze yeah man, I have a helio’s 44-2 which apparently it radioactive, but in such small amounts it’s fine.
I hadn’t realised that the thoriated aging had affected it that much. 1/3 of a stop is quite a bit
I love my 7 element Tak.
No more Takumar's! - (for now)😂. Wait till you wake up at night, wet and shaking, let me tell you, its NO FUN😂😂. That's why I had to get the (Missing Link) Asahi Eltro Zeiss Takumar 500mm f4.5. The best and biggest fix I will ever have🤪
Looking forward for the comparison 👍
Stay safe.
The ADDICTION IS REAL!!!!!! lol Would love a 500mm, completely different photo game at that focal length.
Love it. However I've always been concerned about taking 7 element on vacation because I'm worried airport security may pick up on the radioactivity lol
I've taken this one a few times, I reviewed it in Jamaica back in 2018 and they swabbed it no issues.
David Desjardins I’ve taken this and my radioactive Nikon AIS 85 2.0 and no big deal.
What do you think about fuji xt3 to use manual lens? I got a lot of old vintage lens and I really like shooting with takumar 85 1.8
I had the X-T30 for a little while over the summer and I LOVED it with vintage lenses. The XT3 is an outstanding camera so I think that camera with ANY Takumar will be great!
"No more takumar.."
I know you lie Mark LOL
.
just found this gem channel and iam the big fans of vintage lenses. Love this channel really really love.
subscribe instantly +1
I'm such a bad liar too lol. Thanks for being here mate!
Mine is the 7 one. I know that. I have to use it more often. I just don't find the time to shoot with it at motorsport events as for grid walks its "too slow" (i am focusing) and later on never did tried. But have to find a way to use it.
You'd be surprised how good you can get shooting from the hip with it after some practice. Muscle memory helps a lot, obviously 1.4 is tough, but at 2.8 I can almost eye ball shots based on that depth of field scales for stuff that's relatively close to me.
Try it with some night time/ low light stuff, might be fun!
Curious what other Super Takumar lenses you own in your set. I have the 50mm 8 element and 35mm f2. Lumix S1H.
I have a whole bunch of Takumar reviews up. 50 macro, 85 1.8, 135 2.5, 35 F2, 135 3.5 and 300 F4
Hey Mark my second watch of this videos as I also decided to purchase the 8 elements. May I respectfully suggest watching Simon’s Utak video on the matter? He makes a masterful demonstration of the dreamy look that is unique to the 8 elements and that has generated such a following
I'll have a look when I can. I think at the time of producing this video i had only had it a little while and was more interested in comparing shots. I actually hate doing that because it makes what is a creative venture very technical and in the end I really don't care...do I like it or not. For me the limited edition run of it is really the power behind it, the "cult status" makes it more intriguing. Remove radioactivity and that only makes it more appealing I think. I do love hearing people articulate what they love about a lens, I'm not the best at that, my forte is in video/film production where the shots are built as sequences and other elements like blocking etc are more to think about than the optical details of the lens.
Thanks for the suggestion!
@@MarkHoltze - Analog Insights did a nice homage to the 8-Element tak too.
I just got the 7 element version. Need to clean it a bit first before I can use. Plan on shooting a micro-wedding with it in the spring. Interested to see what it's like on my APS-C camera with a speedbooster too as I think it could make for a great low-light lens.
Definitely!
hi Mark. I have a nerdy question for you...
witch adapter are you using for the SMC?
the one I have (for Sony Alpha) doesn't allow the lens to focus past 2 meters: it too narrow.
it has no problem with the Helios, but doesn't work the SMC Takumar.
A workaround would be to use M42 to Leica M, then Leica M to Sony, but maybe you know better?
thank you for any answer you might have :)
cheers form Berlin
Roberto
Fotodiox M42 to NEX my go to. No issues
@@MarkHoltze thanke you :)
Congrats on 20 k subs - just noticed. Not the best idea when your “rear element” is protruding (drafty😁). Prefer color rendition of 7 element. Great how you picked up on the subtle lens marking differences. How often do you really use the vintage lenses compared with contemporaries?
Thanks Paul. I think the lens markings are what really inspired this video, how to tell the difference between the 8 and 7. I've only been shooting with these old lenses for awhile now, sold off most of my EF glass and my 16-35 Sony E remains largely unused ;)
Nice video! Talk about super takumar 85 f1.9
The 1.9!!! I have the 1.8! The 1.9 is intersting....why 1.9 I wonder.
I've got a good question: regarding the outer-most lens element closes to the lettering "super- takumar, are they interchangeable between the 8 element and the 7 element? I need to replace the outer lens and was curious if I could swap between the two. Might be a dumb question, but I have no clue the answer, and or if it would effect the image quality, being they might not be the same outer glass... anyone? Would the only difference be the yellowing of the radio active 7 element?
Mate I wish I could answer this, but I'm a goon when it comes to the modification process of these optics. SOMEONE must KNOW something. I'm hoping you can find your answer and apologize for not being that guy.
Mark, you should really try the radioactive Canon FD 35mm f2 concave version Thorium lens. It has character and not to mention that its extremely sharp!
You had me at concave version lol! Will keep an eye out!
Nice video. At 4:46 ... the projector image side by side...it seems the 8 element pushes a bit more blur. I'd clean up a radioactive lens personally. After all, I am paying for that f/1.4 aperture. Why lose a stop.
Ive got an 8 element. Earlyish number. It defo has that radioactive yellowing.
My Super-Takumar 8-element has a yellow wash across the front element but it is not a thoriated lens, that was just the coating they used then. The 8 element super Takumar was not thoriated at least that’s what many sources are saying. Are the images it renders yellowish or are you going by the look of the glass.
@@MarkHoltze I'm going by the ook of the glass and also multiple sources that have tested. Many say that some 8 elements aren't and some are. Some say the earlier serials lower than 150000 are non radioactive but mine is just over 100000 and it has the yellowing very similar to my old 7 element just not as strong. I may get it tested for radiation or I may just sell on. Personally I'd prefer to limit my radiation exposure.
Short and sweet
Have to keep this stuff moving ;)
@@MarkHoltze ....
I feel a little optical bench analysis on the 7 element design would be better...
I am trying to locate the Popular Photography magazine in my collection, that has the test bench results.. The old style... Not SQF... subjective quality factor.... I will locate the magazine....
I'm using the Pentax-A 50mm SMC f1.4 and I always thought it to be the second generation Takumar. Apparently it isn't so. Is the Takumar optically better in your opinion? I have used the Pentax quite a bit on my Fuji where it produces results that I can't reproduce with my far more expensive Fuji lenses. The pictures this little gem makes are less sharp but the bokeh is far more pronounced (it's prone to flares though) and it gives more of a dreamy/out of this world look.
Hey not sure if you'll see this but one review that I think would be interesting is a few vintage wide angles. Wides are hard to find in vintage because they are hard to make and get right back then. But every vintage guy or gal is always looking for a wide that has that lovely vintage purity. I know I don't have one and am still struggling to decide on one. Just a thought!
I’ve got a 20, 24 and 29, the 17 fisheye is super wide, well, it’s a fisheye. Good idea though mate! Will pencil it in!
Mark Holtze yeah, if it fits your channel. What brands do you like for your wides?
What is your line-up for the Tak kit or collection I just started purchasing vintage glass and have quite the Tak lineup my self
No particular order: 17mm Fisheye (Super multi-coated) 20 F4.5, 35 F2, 50 F1.4 7 and 8 element 85mm F1.8, 50mm Macro F4, 100MM Macro F4, 135 F2.5 (super multi coated and super takumar).
That's it :) .... (for now)
I know it takes a pretty significant lens to get you to purchase one and then review one especially outside of the takumar realm, but I hope someday you find a deal on a Carl Zeiss Ultron 50 mm 1.8. I just found one for one for a steal, and I need you to make an amazing video to validate my purchase lol