Thank you. Spectacular. What an honor and privilege to still be able to watch these extraordinary talents. Wouldn’t it be great if we had a rebirth? Those were the glory days. Not only the melodies, orchestrations… but the dress code. Marvelous.
That last number was so amazing and so atune to the music - BRAVO !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Огромное спасибо Вам за прекрасное видео и Танцы Шедевр очень Красивое Исполнение Танца Великолепное и Изящное в Этой прекрасной пары. Талант Послан Богом Им. Благодарю вас за Прекрасную Музыку и Видео Чудесное Вы Талант Послан Богом Нам нужен Нам Жить в мире Помогает нам всем. Счастья Любви Взаимной и Радости в жизни вам желаю всего самого наилучшего вам в жизни Успехов во всем. Берегите себя. Галина.
Чудова. дуже гармонічна компіляція відео і музики. Swing and Rock n Roll. Музика молодості! А цю композицію, майстерно зроблену, я б назвав , "Короткий курс з історії творчої діяльності видатного танцювального дієту всіх часів і народів". Велике спасибі авторам твору! Він також "Simply The Best" Георгій Нізамбаєв, Київ, Україна
Richard Chamberlain, My Husband and Lord. Hooo! La la la. Fred and Ginger so smooth. That is the way I wish to dance and sing with you, My Lord, Richard Chamberlain and Husband. Your Wife, Kia Chamberlain. 02/27/24
I love my aunt Ginger who requires her nieces and nephews. I honored her needs of me. She had by Howard McCrary Parents. She and my Granddaddy was sister and brother; non- Christian. By Kia Chamberlain
This is Michelle, his 'Muse', You've got some amazing stuff going on here & what you Subscribed to?....We have very similar 'taste' in so much...wow! Thanx 4 sharing!!
Great dancing partners ruined by attempts to update with rock and roll music. The last number wasn't so great, musically. Any 4/4 meter, up-tempo to match their footwork plays to their dance ability. For instance, turn the vol off and hum "Battle Hymn of the Republic", "Holy, Holy, Holy", or "O Come All Ye Faithful." No, best left to the original Swing-era songs that made their dance routines classics!
Meanwhile, the old stodgy attitude remains unrelatable to younger ears and the classics are bypassed by a whole new generation of discoverers that would otherwise preserve the heritage. It's arts and entertainment. Loosen up. If you don't like it, so what. Go watch your movies and clips your way... Scrooge. There is good accomplished in this work, and it doesn't need or deserve your selfish, condescending negativity.
@@kennethgoin628 So who are these "younger ears" that you presume are discoverers intent on preserving the heritage? Your comment makes no sense. Oversyncing 1950s rock and roll to affecionados of that era/heritage are 60+ years of age, hardly that "new generation" of which you speak. Certainly ANY dance sequence from movies where these 50s rock-and-roll songs is played (think of "Jail House Rock") are superior, IN THEIR OWN RIGHT, than trying to force Fred and Ginger to dance to them. If the goal is to appeal to a new generation then the music would be something a little more contemporary. I doubt whether Ginger and Fred dancing to synced "heavy metal" funk, or rap would preserve anything; certainly not such "dated" 80s music, nor costumes or style of dance as displayed in the clip. Or perhaps you think an opposite attempt; one that demonstrates syncing swing-era music to pop-lock, or any dance style one might see in a club scene is going to relate to younger ears/eyes is an art form. Certainly no need for name calling. I believe "Arts and entertainment" are in the EYES of the beholder, and if you can't appreciate, and respect the original settings then clearly yours need glasses.
@@gg-wr4wv You're clearly short sighted. My niece, while attending college, impressed a professor for knowing who Laurel and Hardy were. The conversation led to watching "Way Out West" which was her favorite, for class. No one else there had ever heard of them and the professor thought the young adults should be shown. While my niece and the professor laughed, everyone else thought it was silly, dated, ridiculous, and had no appreciation for what a timeless comedy duo Laurel and Hardy were or what a timeless comedy the movie still is. These mash-up videos are a bridge, reaching across generation gaps, and expose material in a format that reaches those previously unexposed viewers. They enjoy the music more and that buys time, which exposes more great dancing from an era long gone. BUT... for some, they go further and want to see the original movies. They love the clothes, the cars, the dancing, the stories, and sometimes the music, but in commentary, they still like the combination of newer music with the older dance because it's what they're conditioned to. Without the music to lure their attention, they do not give the classics 2 seconds! We need younger people to develop an appreciation for nostalgia, and the way that gets done is only limited by the imagination. I'm sad that the impression I get from you is one of two things: You are either terribly out of touch with the benefit of the crossover or you're so wrapped up in your own conditioning that you have left no room for difference. Interpretation is a wide-open sky. Why would anyone insist that its representation should only be given in the original production/vision? These videos are getting millions upon millions of views. The viewing audience is not limited to only those who knew who these golden age performers. There are more people learning about Fred Astaire and Ginger Rogers now than they did between 1970 and 2000. Where it leads, is up to them, the younger ones, because we're going to be gone. Some will catch the nostalgia bug. Some of those will keep the original content alive, showing/explaining what made it great. Some will put a spin on it, combining old and new, out of respect and appreciation for the greatness that came before them. Some will take up dance because of it. None of this is mainstream anymore. It had its place, in its time, and the world has moved on. The era of the Golden Greats is far behind us, but it is not forgotten, strongly because of crossover reintroductions like this video. There is nothing insulting, degrading, or destructive about it, when in fact, the result is quite the opposite amongst the masses. Let's say, for instance, that you don't like chocolate or chocolate anything. Does that mean that ice cream is ruined by having chocolate syrup over it? No. It's not ruined. It's just a new flavor. A new flavor loved by millions! So then, what should your attitude be? Everyone who likes chocolate in or on their ice cream should be ashamed of themselves because the original vanilla bean is good enough? How dare they mix it with chocolate, a flavor you despise! Yes. I know. That would be ridiculous. And so is this idea that newer music, any music other than the original scores, ruin Fred and Ginger's performances. It's completely absurd. I also have a nephew that is growing a social group/club of Victrola enthusiasts. He started finding them and fixing them up and collecting the old records from the early 1900s. He, and other younger adults really appreciate the old stuff and they're spreading the word. Know it started? In a rock band. His love of rock music led him on a musician's journey that eventually led back to things over 100yrs old now. He still loves rock, and hears it differently now, seeing the influence of one era crossing into another.
@@kennethgoin628 What-ev-ah. Are you 12? You're mixing your (metaphors)/analogies. Unlike your "chocolate/music/vids," I stayed the course, with my original logical discourse on music/vids through the decades. But again, you are not presenting an argument based on logic. I don't know why you cannot allow me an opinion without berating my views, wishing instead to force yours onto myself and others who may prefer being "purists". You kind of blow your whole argument in your first paragraph, indicating the original 30s Laurel and Hardy were used as an example of original comedy. There is certainly sufficient entertainment/appreciation value to be found embedded within EVERY genre, to allow for a broad spectrum of appreciation in their original formats. Many composers and playwrights were considered radical at their time of introduction into society. However, it takes little talent and only an ability to count 4/4 or 3/4 tempo while throwing clips of a video together with assorted music from alternate decades. You are the one who seems very narrow, rejecting the professionality of the studio and musicians who had a hand in creating the films we have come to love. Instead, you spout the benefits of combining disparate art forms, as if "arts" in their original, creative, and distinct forms do not have an appeal to those whom you profess need a 3rd rate adaptation of same in order to become fine arts converts. If Gen X, Y, and Z'ers need updated(?) versions of "art and entertainment" -- hardly 1950s rock-and-roll synced with 1930s and 40s dance routines and costumes which ALSO do not mesh with Gen's "styles" of the 2020s -- then you may as well paint over the Old Masters with clothing more appropo to these contemporary generations. It seems you are one who would be excited to rewrite text books to create your own "mash-up" historical facts; the concept of history, unlike ice cream, an analogy perfectly befitting the subject-at-hand.
@@gg-wr4wv You're just stuck... "purist". If you feel your opinion is being berated, what do you suppose you're accomplishing with the creator of this video, or your condescending remarks over simplicity. Do you know anything about the person? This could be something of a new endeavor, developmental even. Just stay in your lane, purist. The futures have no room for you.
Fred and lovely dancing 🌹partners were 💯classy and magical‼
Fred e Ginger. Sono e saranno sempre una LEGGENDA incredibile, ballano Da. DIO 🌹🇮🇹🇺🇲👏👏👏💯
Quel talent et quelle classe ils avaient !!!
Thank you. Spectacular. What an honor and privilege to still be able to watch these extraordinary talents. Wouldn’t it be great if we had a rebirth? Those were the glory days. Not only the melodies, orchestrations… but the dress code. Marvelous.
Who are you ?
The "eternal "couple 🔥 Ginger& Fred🤩 What elegance classy ! 🌹🌟🔥
ending with their best number ever
great music best dancers ever
One more time, Fred and Ginger, spices of DANZ-z
That last number was so amazing and so atune to the music - BRAVO !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Me encanta esta pareja bailando. 😂
Mis idolos🎉❤
Absolutely The Best!!!❤
personne personne même en..2022 ne fait mieux que lui pour dancer comme ça, et surtout avec des femmes…👠👠 aussi belles . introuvable. 🎹🎹🎹💐💐💐☀️☀️☀️🇲🇨
Огромное спасибо Вам за прекрасное видео и Танцы Шедевр очень Красивое Исполнение Танца Великолепное и Изящное в Этой прекрасной пары. Талант Послан Богом Им. Благодарю вас за Прекрасную Музыку и Видео Чудесное Вы Талант Послан Богом Нам нужен Нам Жить в мире Помогает нам всем. Счастья Любви Взаимной и Радости в жизни вам желаю всего самого наилучшего вам в жизни Успехов во всем. Берегите себя. Галина.
Beautifull Video And Music!!!! Thank You!!!
Чудова. дуже гармонічна компіляція відео і музики. Swing and Rock n Roll. Музика молодості! А цю композицію, майстерно зроблену, я б назвав , "Короткий курс з історії творчої діяльності видатного танцювального дієту всіх часів і народів". Велике спасибі авторам твору! Він також "Simply The Best"
Георгій Нізамбаєв, Київ, Україна
Best, the best, better than best: ginger Rogers!!!!!
Favolosi...mitici ❤️
Brilliant
Астер, Пушкин в танце!!!
Richard Chamberlain, My Husband and Lord. Hooo! La la la. Fred and Ginger so smooth. That is the way I wish to dance and sing with you, My Lord, Richard Chamberlain and Husband. Your Wife, Kia Chamberlain. 02/27/24
I love my aunt Ginger who requires her nieces and nephews. I honored her needs of me. She had by Howard McCrary Parents. She and my Granddaddy was sister and brother; non- Christian. By Kia Chamberlain
Estupendo la pareja perfecta para bailar
Amazing !!
I want to go back in time when America was America and Americans- Americans. Women- women and Men- men. People liked who they were.
Mitici Li ho sempre amati e per sempre li amero'.Due angeli venuti dal cielo.
This is Michelle, his 'Muse', You've got some amazing stuff going on here & what you Subscribed to?....We have very similar 'taste' in so much...wow! Thanx 4 sharing!!
ME ENCANTANNN....UNICOS, PERFECTOS !!!!
Inoubliable magnifique
Fantástica edición
Обалденно,нет ничего лучшего в танцах
Ginger Rogers, Lucille Ball, Roy Rogers, Ronald Reagan, and my mother all born same year 1911.
Спасибо.
One word one name ....Fred
❤❤❤😅😅😅
🥰
Belos pra sempre !
I heard it said that all ginger Rogers could do was copy. Yeah, right!
Son únicos.
Good. Music, lovely dancing
Such a dynamic duo. No one else came close to matching their style or grace!
Great dancing partners ruined by attempts to update with rock and roll music. The last number wasn't so great, musically. Any 4/4 meter, up-tempo to match their footwork plays to their dance ability. For instance, turn the vol off and hum "Battle Hymn of the Republic", "Holy, Holy, Holy", or "O Come All Ye Faithful." No, best left to the original Swing-era songs that made their dance routines classics!
Meanwhile, the old stodgy attitude remains unrelatable to younger ears and the classics are bypassed by a whole new generation of discoverers that would otherwise preserve the heritage.
It's arts and entertainment. Loosen up. If you don't like it, so what. Go watch your movies and clips your way... Scrooge. There is good accomplished in this work, and it doesn't need or deserve your selfish, condescending negativity.
@@kennethgoin628 So who are these "younger ears" that you presume are discoverers intent on preserving the heritage? Your comment makes no sense. Oversyncing 1950s rock and roll to affecionados of that era/heritage are 60+ years of age, hardly that "new generation" of which you speak. Certainly ANY dance sequence from movies where these 50s rock-and-roll songs is played (think of "Jail House Rock") are superior, IN THEIR OWN RIGHT, than trying to force Fred and Ginger to dance to them.
If the goal is to appeal to a new generation then the music would be something a little more contemporary. I doubt whether Ginger and Fred dancing to synced "heavy metal" funk, or rap would preserve anything; certainly not such "dated" 80s music, nor costumes or style of dance as displayed in the clip. Or perhaps you think an opposite attempt; one that demonstrates syncing swing-era music to pop-lock, or any dance style one might see in a club scene is going to relate to younger ears/eyes is an art form.
Certainly no need for name calling. I believe "Arts and entertainment" are in the EYES of the beholder, and if you can't appreciate, and respect the original settings then clearly yours need glasses.
@@gg-wr4wv You're clearly short sighted.
My niece, while attending college, impressed a professor for knowing who Laurel and Hardy were. The conversation led to watching "Way Out West" which was her favorite, for class. No one else there had ever heard of them and the professor thought the young adults should be shown. While my niece and the professor laughed, everyone else thought it was silly, dated, ridiculous, and had no appreciation for what a timeless comedy duo Laurel and Hardy were or what a timeless comedy the movie still is.
These mash-up videos are a bridge, reaching across generation gaps, and expose material in a format that reaches those previously unexposed viewers. They enjoy the music more and that buys time, which exposes more great dancing from an era long gone. BUT... for some, they go further and want to see the original movies. They love the clothes, the cars, the dancing, the stories, and sometimes the music, but in commentary, they still like the combination of newer music with the older dance because it's what they're conditioned to. Without the music to lure their attention, they do not give the classics 2 seconds!
We need younger people to develop an appreciation for nostalgia, and the way that gets done is only limited by the imagination.
I'm sad that the impression I get from you is one of two things: You are either terribly out of touch with the benefit of the crossover or you're so wrapped up in your own conditioning that you have left no room for difference. Interpretation is a wide-open sky. Why would anyone insist that its representation should only be given in the original production/vision?
These videos are getting millions upon millions of views. The viewing audience is not limited to only those who knew who these golden age performers. There are more people learning about Fred Astaire and Ginger Rogers now than they did between 1970 and 2000. Where it leads, is up to them, the younger ones, because we're going to be gone. Some will catch the nostalgia bug. Some of those will keep the original content alive, showing/explaining what made it great. Some will put a spin on it, combining old and new, out of respect and appreciation for the greatness that came before them. Some will take up dance because of it.
None of this is mainstream anymore. It had its place, in its time, and the world has moved on. The era of the Golden Greats is far behind us, but it is not forgotten, strongly because of crossover reintroductions like this video. There is nothing insulting, degrading, or destructive about it, when in fact, the result is quite the opposite amongst the masses.
Let's say, for instance, that you don't like chocolate or chocolate anything. Does that mean that ice cream is ruined by having chocolate syrup over it? No. It's not ruined. It's just a new flavor. A new flavor loved by millions! So then, what should your attitude be? Everyone who likes chocolate in or on their ice cream should be ashamed of themselves because the original vanilla bean is good enough? How dare they mix it with chocolate, a flavor you despise!
Yes. I know. That would be ridiculous. And so is this idea that newer music, any music other than the original scores, ruin Fred and Ginger's performances. It's completely absurd.
I also have a nephew that is growing a social group/club of Victrola enthusiasts. He started finding them and fixing them up and collecting the old records from the early 1900s. He, and other younger adults really appreciate the old stuff and they're spreading the word. Know it started? In a rock band. His love of rock music led him on a musician's journey that eventually led back to things over 100yrs old now. He still loves rock, and hears it differently now, seeing the influence of one era crossing into another.
@@kennethgoin628 What-ev-ah. Are you 12?
You're mixing your (metaphors)/analogies. Unlike your "chocolate/music/vids," I stayed the course, with my original logical discourse on music/vids through the decades. But again, you are not presenting an argument based on logic. I don't know why you cannot allow me an opinion without berating my views, wishing instead to force yours onto myself and others who may prefer being "purists".
You kind of blow your whole argument in your first paragraph, indicating the original 30s Laurel and Hardy were used as an example of original comedy. There is certainly sufficient entertainment/appreciation value to be found embedded within EVERY genre, to allow for a broad spectrum of appreciation in their original formats. Many composers and playwrights were considered radical at their time of introduction into society. However, it takes little talent and only an ability to count 4/4 or 3/4 tempo while throwing clips of a video together with assorted music from alternate decades. You are the one who seems very narrow, rejecting the professionality of the studio and musicians who had a hand in creating the films we have come to love. Instead, you spout the benefits of combining disparate art forms, as if "arts" in their original, creative, and distinct forms do not have an appeal to those whom you profess need a 3rd rate adaptation of same in order to become fine arts converts.
If Gen X, Y, and Z'ers need updated(?) versions of "art and entertainment" -- hardly 1950s rock-and-roll synced with 1930s and 40s dance routines and costumes which ALSO do not mesh with Gen's "styles" of the 2020s -- then you may as well paint over the Old Masters with clothing more appropo to these contemporary generations.
It seems you are one who would be excited to rewrite text books to create your own "mash-up" historical facts; the concept of history, unlike ice cream, an analogy perfectly befitting the subject-at-hand.
@@gg-wr4wv You're just stuck... "purist". If you feel your opinion is being berated, what do you suppose you're accomplishing with the creator of this video, or your condescending remarks over simplicity. Do you know anything about the person? This could be something of a new endeavor, developmental even. Just stay in your lane, purist. The futures have no room for you.