If people part ways, for the reason it may be, amicably or not, doesn't mean that someone has to be available for that past partner... if someone wants to rekindle it's fine, but thinking they will be at your disposition just because you had history with before , no, I don't agree.
Respectfully, I will have to disagree here. Not to say that two people with a past can’t grow and revisit and rekindle smoke left from the fire. This may be the case when someone is not completely done. I don’t feel that just because there is a past history there, any man from my past should have access to me. Generally when I’m done, there’s no linking up. I value my peace and my peace includes him being in my rear view, if I’m completely done.
@@vFelixBlackv I have no contact with my exes. They are my exes for a reason. I only have contact with my ex husband, because we share two kids. Had that not been the case, he would be Black History too! This applies to friendships, as well.
@@ZenoToo Ok, we all carry things different. While this isn't the case with all my exes. There is one or two that I still cordial with, just because something is in the past doesn't mean it was BAD, as I stated in the video. Thanks for your comment and sharing.
@@vFelixBlackv You’re right, it does not mean that every past situation was bad and I do speak to a few when I see them. However, the context of what I understood from your video was a man or woman is supposed to have access to an ex no matter what. That is totally different from being friends with an ex and couldn’t be the farthest from the truth.
@@ZenoToo See that's my point, you speak to a few when you seem them, that was my point in the video. I said I expect to have access not that men and women SHOULD be doing.
If people part ways, for the reason it may be, amicably or not, doesn't mean that someone has to be available for that past partner... if someone wants to rekindle it's fine, but thinking they will be at your disposition just because you had history with before , no, I don't agree.
It is ok to disagree, but I still feel that way.
De repente tomar un café o una charla amena si ambos siguen solteros y no tienen ninguna relación actual
Exactly, I do not see anything wrong with that. Glad you agree.
Respectfully, I will have to disagree here. Not to say that two people with a past can’t grow and revisit and rekindle smoke left from the fire. This may be the case when someone is not completely done. I don’t feel that just because there is a past history there, any man from my past should have access to me. Generally when I’m done, there’s no linking up. I value my peace and my peace includes him being in my rear view, if I’m completely done.
Thank you for your comment. I appreciate that. So you have no contact with any of your exes? Do you have one that you still talk to amicably?
@@vFelixBlackv I have no contact with my exes. They are my exes for a reason. I only have contact with my ex husband, because we share two kids. Had that not been the case, he would be Black History too! This applies to friendships, as well.
@@ZenoToo Ok, we all carry things different. While this isn't the case with all my exes. There is one or two that I still cordial with, just because something is in the past doesn't mean it was BAD, as I stated in the video. Thanks for your comment and sharing.
@@vFelixBlackv You’re right, it does not mean that every past situation was bad and I do speak to a few when I see them. However, the context of what I understood from your video was a man or woman is supposed to have access to an ex no matter what. That is totally different from being friends with an ex and couldn’t be the farthest from the truth.
@@ZenoToo See that's my point, you speak to a few when you seem them, that was my point in the video. I said I expect to have access not that men and women SHOULD be doing.