I bought a CX-30 in February. Each and every time I drive it, I feel like I got a tremendous bargain for what I paid. It's comfortable, fun to drive and feels so much more premium than any of the competitors that I considered. It's been a long time since I felt that I "loved" a vehicle that I purchased. However, I really love this one!
Mazdas have that effect on people for sure. Case in point: I felt the CX-30 was too small… but I’m currently driving the 3 hatch and I make excuses for it all day long. Literally the same vehicle, but I just adore the hatch (even though it costs the exact same price). 🤷🏼♂️
Great and honest review. I filled out the form but there are other things I want to share. I will be buying a cx-30 for a few reasons. NO touch screen. NO cvt. Great exterior styling. Love the red paint. Great driving dynamics. Small suv. If I needed more room I would buy a bigger Mazda. Beautiful interior. I have researched a lot and for me, nothing else can compare We all have different needs and preferences. The cx-30 meets all mine. Thanks for the review.
Of course! Thanks for watching! And you're absolutely right: for the people whose needs are met by the CX-30's combination of attributes, they'll likely love it.
Did you buy one, which model? I have an older CX-5, great car, spacious for pax and cargo. Now considering a smaller car for my wife, and myself...if I get on with the CX-30. Rear seat capacity not an issue for us, probably manage with the smaller boot/trunk. Have yet to sit in one and test drive, but expect it will 'feel' much more compact than my CX-5 (because of the shallow windows). It will probably be just right for my wife who presently has an even smaller car.
Okay. Done with my research now and there just isn't any other car that interests me as much as the CX-30. Everything I need and nothing I don't. Planning to buy at end of December 2023. Which trim will depend on what I can find or my whim at the time. Hmmm. To turbo or not to turbo.That is the question. Leaning toward a non-turbo premium at the moment.
@@delreed2906 Agree with your choice of Mazda. I don't find Honda, Hyundai, Toyota, Kia, Ford, VW or the premium German cars have attractive styling; it's good that we all have different tastes. I have a turbo diesel CX-5 (great torque) and will need convincing to go for the non turbo petrol CX-30. Colours...I am liking the Machine Grey, Midnight Blue, Soul Red. The dark colurs blend better (help hide) the disproportionate external plastic mouldings. Good luck with finding your chosen CX-30 👍.
I purchased a CX-30 2.5 Select Trim model back in February for $25K, as the dealer took off the destination charge since I was literally taking the vehicle right off of the trailer. I traded in a 2015 Chevy Sonic LS and find that the CX-30 drives like a more sophisticated version of my old car. I enjoy that it still drives like a car instead of a typical SUV and has the added utility of a hatchback design. Compared with the Sonic, it took me a while to get used to some of the updated tech. While it doesn't have a fancy touchscreen interface, the infotainment is a nice upgrade from the base radio in my Sonic (one of the last years to have a radio with real buttons and no backup camera). We don't have children so the back seat space isn't really an issue, and with the rear seat folded I find that it has a pretty decent amount of cargo space. Overall I enjoy the fact that it has excellent driving dynamics and a more luxurious interior for not a whole lot of money, so I find it to be a nice upgrade/compromise from my last car.
Reviewers really need to stop saying that COMPACT vehicles need to stop being COMPACT. If you want a bigger car, just buy a bigger car. It’s absolutely crazy that reviewers keep telling manufacturers to get rid of their smaller vehicles. I mean they ALL actually make tons of bigger cars while COMPACT cars are rapidly disappearing. It’s seriously the silliest thing that so many reviewers review COMPACT cars and critique them for being COMPACT.
Or… it could be because it’s small relative to other vehicles in the same segment that cost less money. Never said there shouldn’t be compact (COMPACT!) vehicles, but there are other brands maximizing the space in the same vehicle footprint.
@@jax1079 The GTI probably has the best use of space. You still get giant men reviewing them & being disappointed that it’s a COMPACT car - lol. Likewise with the two or 3 subcompacts that are left. Giant man reviewer: Good gosh !!!! This car is SUBCOMPACT !!!! 😉
I agree. I WANT a small suv. Keep making them!!! There is a market for them. If you don’t like it get a bigger car, there are plenty. Some of these review’s annoying me complaining about the size as if that isn’t the point!
I just bought this car today; and was pleasantly surprise for its excellent handling and comfortable ride. It drives like a luxury car, the driving experience feels very stabled and solid on the road. I don't care what anyone says but bumps and uneven road surfaces, not even the most luxury of cars, can't avoid them! I bought the base cloth upholstery model for $24,900! I don't regret buying it! the cargo area while very small; I resolved that issue by folding the back seats flat; so now I have double the space. I highly recommend the Mazda cx-30. My advice is to skip all the extra trimmings; like heated seats, leather seats, sunroofs; and you will be saving tons of money, so stick to the base models!!
I live in a city in the northeast USA and am shopping for a replacement for my 2016 VW Golf. Test-drove the CX30 and it's my ideal: near-premium quality inside and out, driver focused and snug, with a distinctive profile that's less bulky and more nimble than a Taos or a RAV4 (which drives like a bus!) and less expensive than a BMW X1. So for me the CX30 hits the sweet spot. The thing is, it seems that folks in my city are catching on because these days you can't go two blocks without seeing one. The CX30 is EVERYWHERE here and is almost as ubiquitous as the CX5, which has been around far longer. Which speaks to what I think you missed in your review, that the actual target for this vehicle is urban drivers like me in medium and larger cities seeking the smallest possible crossover package to navigate crowded streets and still have a little practicality for good measure. The CX30 has as much storage space as my very practical Golf, with a bit more ground clearance and way more luxury, comfort and tech. And at 5'11' I fit quite comfortably behind my driving position and actually enjoyed the comfort and position of the raised back seat. I'm relieved to find a crossover I can use to zip along narrow city streets with confidence and fit into tight parking spaces. I can't wait to get mine in a couple months!
I'm 27, 5'-7" and not married (no kids) and in the market for a crossover. I've been tracking the Corolla Cross for a long time and was ready to buy the hybrid that just released but it's at least 4-6 months out at a minimum, at least at dealerships where I live. But Mazda has a great offer of 0.9% APR for 3 years right now and the base trim does the job for me. That makes it considerably cheaper than the Corolla Cross hybrid base trim ($5k cheaper). The corolla cross base trim is the same price as the base CX-30 but I test-drove the 2022 models of both cars and the Mazda was so much better in terms of driving experience. Since the CX-30 has better power (191 hp vs 169 hp), almost similar mileage and it's a little cheaper on the base trims as well I think I'm going to go for the CX-30. My budget is also around $25k so I think I'm gonna go for the CX-30 since it's readily available with a great financing offer at the table right now. Thanks for your review! It helped me confirm my purchase!
Homework complete professor! I own a 2022 CX-30 in the EXACT spec you reviewed. I purchased it pre-owned in January CPO’d. for $33k with 5,000 miles on the clock. For me, as a single dude with a dog, who lives in a city it is the perfect vehicle. This marks the 6th Mazda I’ve owned since 1993 and is the first time in my life I’ve owned one vehicle. I’m looking at a clean 1971 280SL on Monday. Growing up is hard to do. 😂
Interesting… you really fall into the EXACT attributes of this vehicle, which is great for you, but I’m not sure Mazda wants the demo to be quite so narrow 😂 Still, enjoy your turbo! And thanks for watching 🙏🏻
@@jax1079 - Essentially, this vehicle is made for individuals, couples w/o kids (or with small kids) or individuals who would buy something like a Mazda 3, Corolla or Civic but want it somewhat higher. Having given away a Ford Explorer that I drove, I have actually "grown" into this vehicle's size quite well.
This comment might be a little late but in my opinion the CX-30 being the smallest of its competitors can sometimes be a good thing, I personally don't like SUV´s, I've always had cars but just started transitioning into the subcompact category and was looking for something that is not too big, still drives like a car and is sporty looking. I'm also super short so it works perfect for me, I'm glad the CX-30 exists!
I’m actually glad you bring this up. I think a lot of the pushback comments have been treating this like a black and white issue. If the size of the CX-30 works for you then it’s a very satisfying small crossover, but if you’re expecting practical packaging and cargo space, you’ll be disappointed. It’s not for everyone, but for some people it might be perfect.
Picking up a cx30 today. I was between this and an HRV. The HRV would’ve been 4 months out and this one was readily available and after driving both, I really like the non turbo cx30 more than the HRV. It has a little bit more power for highway driving than the HRV which felt really sluggish trying to get onto the highway. I’m also a single dude and I don’t have a Stanley so I think this fits my niche
This is true: the HR-V is catastrophically slow, and the base engine in the CX-30 is definitely superior. I’d say for your use case the CX-30 sounds just about perfect. Thanks for watching 🙏🏻
I'm 6'0" and was able to sit behind myself without any trouble in this vehicle. I'm looking at the base model for affordability, but I would like a turbo so I keep my 0-60 time under 6 seconds. Thanks for your insight, JAX.
No problem! More normal sized people might find the space adequate, especially depending on what stage of life you’re in. For our family of tallish freaks, it’s a no go. Thanks for watching 🙏🏻
I'm 6'1" and I fit behind myself too in my new CX-30. Now, I wouldn't want to sit in the rear for long; however, it's comfortable for relatively normal driving distances.
It's not as small as many of the reviewers make it out to be. I do wish it was a bit longer like Crosstrek but it can transport four average Europeans (5'10-6) if they are not lardasses.
If you’ve had a problematic CVT-turbo engine (a 37k vehicle reduced to scrap metal)…Mazda is the ONLY choice! What is considered “outdated” by some is SAFE for others!
This is true, but it’s not like CVTs are the ONLY alternative (more common now for sure though). Curious what brand you had before as well since that’s a great cautionary tale. Thanks for watching 🙏🏻
@@jax1079 fair, most manufacturers are moving to the CVT these days to improve horse power & fuel economy (even the mainstream heavy hitters like Honda and Toyota). I had a Hyundai, but similar problems have been reported by Nissan and KIA. Also, Hyundai refused to replace the faulty engine (even with a recall) and there were 60 vehicles in line ahead of mine, not driveable and worthless. 😞
We should thank sleepy joe for raising the gas mileage standards all the time. But i guess throwing away billion dollar tanks into the useless war in Ukraine isn't causing climate change i guess?
Enjoyed the video, and I think you make some great points. So many thoughts here. Mazda is a brand that I share your love for, and I also fear they are falling behind. Not only is their is brand identity getting a bit lost in the shift up market, but with the impending transition to EVs looming I think many brands are going to get shuffled around. Mazda prioritizing driving dynamics still helps make them distinct, but I am concerned about their ability to compete if they slip too much on the tech side. I’m optimistic that if Mazda can develop an EV that has amazing dynamics they can once again distinguish the brand in that space. Most of the new EVs have a lot of power, but you hear very little about good driving dynamics in EVs for the most part. I hear a lot of “adequate” steering and handling. So I think there is room for Mazda to let that be something that sets them apart, but they can’t let the tech fall too far behind. I think for many, driving dynamics fall into a “nice to have” tie-breaker, but too many compromises can break the deal. Very curious to hear the results of your survey. Is it getting broadcast beyond this channel? I’d assume most people that regularly watch RUclips channels about cars are enthusiasts, which would likely skew your results in favor of driving dynamics.
Thanks! I’m totally with you: I absolutely love Mazda and everything they stand for, so I want to see them win. However, the market is the market, and to stay viable they’re going to have to do a better job catering to what people actually want. That’s why I made a video a while back saying they should just make SUVs and the Miata. They’ve proven they can do it better than everyone else (CX-5), so they should double down on that for profitability. Fingers crossed the CX-90 is good… 🤞🏻
Really loving having Meghan's perspective on a regular basis! So the Mazda has 250 hp, drives great and costs $25K... sounds like a half-price base Porsche Macan? Except it's tiny! I had no idea how small they were😬 Beautiful cinematography as usual!
@@jax1079 In case you missed it, low to mid 30s is less than the average price people pay for cars in 2023. So having to go that “high” for the magnificent 250hp turbo is a good value, if not a downright bargain.
I don't know how tall you are but I am a little above average and I can sit in the front and in the back behind myself not that it would ever happen. It wouldn't be great for a long trip in the back seat at my height but it is as much room as a plane if not more so I'd say the limit would be about 2-3 hours in the back
Just spent a week in the non-turbo. The handling dynamics are there but oddly, found the transmission quite confused versus the crisp shifting experience of the 3. I think this kinda only competes with the 3 as it looks to be outselling it 2 to 1 despite not driving as well and having no extra space. The AWD system is pretty good though and the higher seating position and better ride comfort steal 3 buyers. It kinda stands alone making cross shopping it a little silly. The Crosstrek and Seltos prove you can actually have real interior space without blowing up the outside like the HR-V did. Excellent commentary! And enjoy Mrs Jax’s, I mean Meghan’s, thoughts.
Meanwhile...back at the ranch Mazda sold over 8k of these last month which was it's best month ever so...there is that. This model has only existed for 3 yrs and 4 months. It's catching on slowly as is the NEW Mazda, which rebooted its entire brand only what 8, or 9 years ago. They're trying to change a reputation they spent 75 years building. That's hard to do and won't change easily but it's happening.
Mazda doesn't have time for that. They are one of the smallest independent automakers on the planet. They need vehicles to succeed the way the CX-5 has succeeded. They need the CX-90 to be a smash (and it looks like it). Otherwise, they need to hope a giant like Toyota swallows them up and allows them to be the premium performance arm of the company.
@JAX Automotive I don't agree. Since they are small they don't have to sell a million units. They can have less profitability and survive as long as they can stay away from losing money with recalls, or class action suits. Plus, it's not like the CX30 is failing. It's increasing sales all the time. The customer they are targeting isn't a family man per se. It's someone who wants a stylish, more premium product/experience, and is willing to pay a little more to get it. They are strategically placing themselves a little above the mainstream and a little lower than the luxury class. That's their niche. Is it working? I think so but the economy has had several hiccups lately that has slowed their progress. Will electrification be their demise? Maybe, but I don't believe that will take off unless it is mandated by corrupt politicians.
Great subcompact crossover with a fairly luxe interior, great driving dynamics and willing powertrain. I like your review style. I also am bored with graphite grey metallic EVERYWHERE but Mazda does this color wonderfully. Like you though I found it just a bit too compact for my needs as my next car for a decade or so. Went with the Impreza RS and am very happy with its comfort, room and driving dynamics for my everyday needs. My first CVT (my other car is a WRX) and it drives fine. I’ve figured out its nuances- stomping it for 0-60 runs will frustrate you, but ease into it firmly after a second or two yields a respectable eagerness.
my homework submission: just got a CPO 22 turbo premium for $29k with only 1.4k miles (ex-test drive unit). I won’t consider it at its full price ($35k…) Back seats are indeed so small for a “SUV” but I don’t care lol. I am paying the car not my passengers. If they don’t like it they could go take the bus 🚌
I own a older 2007 mazda 3 and this is a great review and i have to agree this being my first car ive owned its great. Bought it used but overall its a solid car and i have to agree with this review.
I have the carbon edition and I love it. My wife and I don't have children but we do have small dogs. Rear space is not an issue for us for this reason. Compared to our 2012 mazda3 1.8 liter 155 hp, the cx 30 base engine is a turbo so it didn't make sense to add more money to the price. Handling is still great even with the torsion beam. I have had a Mazda since 1989 amd they keep getting better and better. Would like better gas mileage so will eventually get a PHEV.
Nice! Sounds like you’re the perfect customer for the CX-30! I’m a big Mazda fan, myself, but I’d love to see the CX-30 become ever so slightly more usable in its next iteration. Then again, I’m in a gorgeous red Mazda3 this week and I don’t care about the space at all. 😂
@JAX Automotive I agree. I would love a larger gas tank also. Not sure why they didn't make it a tad larger. Still has more pros than cons though. It is our inexpensive premium/luxury vehicle.
Definitely try to highlight it in pretty much every vehicle we have to test. Tall people have to look out for one another! Well, that and my girls are 6'1" and 5'11", so it's relevant to my family for sure!
I want to be nice here, but I have to say this review didn't make a lot of sense. This is a Japanese designed subcompact SUV. No, it doesn't have enough space for every conceivable situation. It is the smallest SUV in their lineup. If you need something bigger, then there are alternatives within the Mazda lineup or elsewhere. Horses for courses. Not only that, but you picked the most expensive model and implied that this is what most people would really want or need. Not true. The standard engine is more than adequate and has better acceleration than the base engines of most of its competitors. The Mazda 6-speed transmission is one of its best attributes. Why? Because it is a proven unit and one of the best bets for long-term reliability in the entire automotive industry. There are a lot of transmissions, especially CVT''s, that are known to be problematic or have a big question mark when it comes to reliability. If long-term reliability doesn't concern you, then lease whatever you like best and return it while the drivetrain is still under warranty. I have a 2023 Mazda 3 with a manual transmission and the standard engine. It has plenty of power for road use and I can sit in the back seat in perfect comfort. If you are 6' 6" and you want to haul a basketball team or go on a vacation to Wally World with a three teenaged children, then get something bigger. That's why they make more than one model.
I get what you’re saying. My thought is this: there are a number of compelling alternatives that offer more space and practicality in the same exterior footprint for less money. That’s not great from a competition standpoint, and as a fan of Mazda, I want to see them succeed. I’m not sure design and dynamics is enough to trump value for a lot of non enthusiast buyers. The CX-5 succeeds because it’s priced in line with the competition and only slightly smaller, but the CX-30 is priced way above the competition in loaded trim despite lacking cooled seats, wireless CarPlay, and a pano roof… all “luxury” features that would help justify the price. And it’s SIGNIFICANTLY smaller, not just a little smaller. That being said, I’m perfectly happy being an irrational and hypocritical idiot: I’m currently driving a Mazda3 Turbo hatch that costs $37k and I don’t care because it’s freaking gorgeous.
I'll be replacing my 2012 Mazda3 hatchback later this year. I drive 70 miles of freeway and one mile of crummy dirt road every day. (This winter's storms beat the shit out of the road and my car.) I haven't had anybody in the backseat since 2014 and keep the seats folded down all the time. I've been looking at prospects and even the Mazda CX5 looks too big. The CX30 looks perfect, except for the lack of a Manual Transmission.
Mazda offers something different to buyers. They are betting their strategy catches on. Consider the alternative they face. They could make a more spacious subcompact that looks and drives like everything else but then why would anyone choose a Mazda? The fact is Honda, Toyota, and Subaru already occupy that space and have a head start of about 30-40 years in good reputation and brand desireability. Their strategy is wise because they have their own niche. Now they have to just stay consistent and eventually they'll break through...they hope. I think they will. Their cars are different but the road to failure would be to do what their competitors are doing. You seem to be suggesting they do that, but that's not really an option.
No, I'm suggesting they inject their substantial Mazda DNA and identity into a more usable package. If driving dynamics was enough to entice buyers, then companies like BMW would still be shouting "ultimate driving machine" and offering manual transmissions across the board. There's a reason BMW has moved away from that and is now making hideous, tech-laden, SUVs and EVs: it's what the market wants, it's what sells, it's what brings in the profits. Mazda should always be Mazda, but it's a problem when their primary competitors are all offering substantially more usable space at a far more affordable price. If the CX-30 was only slightly smaller than the HR-V and Corolla Cross, it would be understandable, but it's quite a bit smaller. Even optioned in a lower trim with the prices being more even, the usability will a compromise that most small families won't want to make. With car prices skyrocketing, a young family might need a vehicle like this because a larger SUV is out of the question. Trust me, they need space more than they need dynamics.
@@jax1079 I don't think Mazda is trying to compete with Toyota, Honda, Subaru or Koreans in sales. They are trying to be more premium, all around quality, great driving dynamics brand. All they need is convert 5-10% of other brands customers combined with their own loyal customer and they'll be ok. Not everyone cares for hybrids or EVs yet they definitely have carefully mapped out their hybrid/EV timeline for next 5 - 7 years. They may be a little late with hybrid and EVs but if they can retain the same high quality and driving dynamics with decent practicality they will gradually continue to ascend towards the top. Their Rwd inline 6 architecture could be a game changer for them if they execute on it well.
I disagree about the CX-30 needing to "grow up", as going larger would mean losing much of it's appeal. As an owner of a 2021 Mazda 3 turbo hatch I consider the CX-30 as a Mazda 3 variant, nothing more than that. If car buyers would simply ignore Mazda marketing this thing as a crossover and take it for what it really is, (Mazda 3 with a lift kit, slightly different body/interior) then I think it would not only sell much better, people wouldn't expect it to be something it isn't. The next gen CX-30 needs Mazda's new 8 speed trans (already exists on the CX-70/90) and an available hybrid drivetrain, better infotainment...that's pretty much it, and same goes for the next Mazda 3. I hope Mazda doesn't try to compete with everything else in the segment by making it larger and boxy...that's not what Mazda is about.
Well, the 2012 RAV4 is listed at over 36 cubic feet of cargo space while this is only 20 cubic feet. That's a MASSIVE difference in vehicles of this size. The RAV4 also has significantly more rear seat room compared to this, especially if anyone involved is tall. Hope that helps!
No. That is what the CX-50, CX-90 and coming soon CX-70 are for. The CX-30 is about the size of the Crosstrek. If you are only interested in practical, buy the Corolla Cross or HR-V. The best value CX-30 is Preferred or Carbon Edition. Even the base engine is more powerful than the competition.
Somewhat agree. There is a LOT to love about the CX-30, but… it still needs to at least pretend to be practical, which it doesn’t. That’s why I just reviewed the Mazda3 and said I loved it way more: as a car, it’s great! The CX-5 is already small for the class, and the CX-30 is significantly smaller still.
@@jax1079 I think it is practical for single or couple that enjoy driving. The CX-5 isn't really fun to drive. My wife has a 2019 Mazda CX-3 and it is even smaller. Sold our POS 2013 Crosstrek. We looked at everything in the compact and sub-compact SUV class and she liked it the best. It is great for running around town. Great handling and easy to park. probably going to replace my 2017 Civic EX-T with the CX-30.
Mazda literally has 4 other vehicles that grow in size.... with marginal price increases by size......what was the point of this video? The CX-30 is small for people that want a smaller car. If you wanted a bigger one get the CX-50 or CX-5. Not hard....
It looks nice. Feels like Mazda wants to compete with Acura. I think Mazda has a identity crisis. Small and premium don’t go hand in hand. In a way I don’t think they can compete with Toyota or Honda or Koreans, so their schtick is to claim they are premium. Premium front wheel drive tiny. Lol. I take a RAV-4 over any Mazda.
I agree. I freaking LOVE Mazda, but the “zoom zoom” branding just isn’t the move anymore. With companies like BMW distancing themselves from their ultimate driving machine image to focus more on tech and the future, being a brand known for performance isn’t going to make up for some of the shortcomings like it used to. It sucks for sure, but we’ve seen Honda moving away from this as well, and sadly, I think it’s going to be a good move for them (since Toyota had a bit of a head start in the practicality image).
@@jax1079 Mazda is more comparable to Alfa Romeo than to BMW. They have said it themselves quite openly that they want to be Japanese Alfa. Alfa Romeo's do not have all the modern gadgets and fads current german cars have but when it comes to driving and looks they beat everything in their respective class. I'd take Alfa Romeo over any of the germans without a blink of an eye. And this is what sets CX30 apart from the competition. Great design, no fugly ipad sticking out of the dash, great interior, and what's most important, driving. After driving most of the competition recently went back to CX30 for a second look, and bought it immediately afterwards. The driving experience is just so relaxing and natural in this car. Great linear feedback, the car is predictable, everything is driver focused, no annoying gadgets, and quiet cabin. Yes, it's not the biggest in class and Mazda has obviously sacrificed a lot of practicality for design and driving dynamics but in the end for me it won out because I do have to take quite long drives, often on curvy country roads and this thing is just so much more fun to drive. My wife has a same class KIA and there's just no comparison.
Jaxx, you were being unduly harsh and negative towards the Mazda CX-30. First of all, you have to admit that you're extremely tall. Even the example you used of 6 foot is too tall. The average adult American male is 5'9-5'10. Average adult American female is 5'4. Your wife is 5 inches taller than the average American woman. No wonder both of you found the backseats to be useless and the interior to be cramped! Most Americans will find the backseats useful and sufficient, especially for a sub-compact crossover. The majority of Americans are much shorter than you and your wife. Please realize that & review cars accordingly. You also kept mentioning how expensive the turbo model is in comparison to the Honda HRV but even the base 191 hp Mazda CX-30 engine is a lot more powerful than the 158 hp and CVT in the HRV. TheTopher said it took him almost 13 seconds to do zero to 60 in the 2023 HRV and that's with him alone in the car! Horrible! The HRV loaded down with family and cargo would take over 15 seconds! CX-30 with base engine has a zero to 60 of 8 seconds. Mazda CX-30 in the lower trims is also very price competitive with the HRV and Taos and arguably more luxurious than both of them. In fact, Mazda dealers are much more likely to sell you a new Mazda for MSRP or below MSRP as compared to Honda dealers. Honda dealers are notorious for making you pay for pro-pack and market adjustment. Taos has a turbocharged engine which is not good for long term reliability.
I get where you're coming from, but I worry that Mazda's focus on driving dynamics starts to become irrelevant in many consumers' eyes when you get down into the same price bracket as the HR-V and Corolla Cross. Topher is right: the HR-V is slow as balls, but... I wasn't the least bit bothered by it in day to day driving when I had it. People will choose practicality over zest if they have ANY practical needs (such as children). And you're right about the Taos having a turbo engine, which is concerning for long term reliability... but the cool CX-30 is cool BECAUSE it has a turbo. (I would still lean Mazda, though because German reliability is an oxymoron of the highest degree) As for height... well, you're not wrong, but we generally fit in most mainstream vehicles just fine, and I point out if the seat adjustment specifically renders the rear seat useless. Megan actually likes to drive with her legs more extended than me, so she usually leaves the seat where it is. At 5'9" she's the same height as an average dude, so I would argue that the CX-30 is still on the small side even for average people. Thanks for watching!
@@jax1079 Thanks for the detailed response! I do agree that the other options are more practical than the CX-30 and that could indeed lead to declining sales. And yes, the CX-30 is cozy even for average people unfortunately.
5'9" w/29" inseam. I test drove and also tried that back seat. The back seat wasn't happening for my legs or head. It was comical looking at the salesman crammed back there during the test drive. Fun car to drive for two max. Useless back seats. Another dislike, the rear is one big blindspot. Poor vis out of the little slits/windows. I liked driving the CX30 and the perceived reliability of the NA 2.5 with automatic trans. The back seat was the deal breaker.
New BMWs look downright ugly inside and outside with their new horrible design language. Only brands that have a decent design comparable to new Mazdas are Alfa Romeo and Jaguar. Also what other car has interior quality equal or better to Mazda in this class? Recently drove most of them and there's no competition. Crosstrek is only one that isn't fucking ugly and horrible inside. It's not great but relatively bearable compared to others like Toyota, KIA, WV or Honda.
Quality and design/materials are two different things: the Honda HR-V’s interior quality and materials are as good as the CX-30, and the design isn’t much worse at all. In fact, I’d argue that the HR-V’s interior is equal to if not superior to the CX-30’s interior, but the HR-V’s exterior design is fugly. But if you’re after USABLE space and practicality, the HR-V is much, much better.
@@jax1079 I do agree that Mazda has sacrificed some practicality to design for driving dynamics. In this regard I wish it was a bit longer and higher like Crosstrek. But Honda is not competitive, imho. They do not even have back seat vents and they have been saving money by cutting out the back seat center arm rest!
I bought a CX-30 in February. Each and every time I drive it, I feel like I got a tremendous bargain for what I paid. It's comfortable, fun to drive and feels so much more premium than any of the competitors that I considered. It's been a long time since I felt that I "loved" a vehicle that I purchased. However, I really love this one!
Mazdas have that effect on people for sure. Case in point: I felt the CX-30 was too small… but I’m currently driving the 3 hatch and I make excuses for it all day long. Literally the same vehicle, but I just adore the hatch (even though it costs the exact same price). 🤷🏼♂️
Great and honest review. I filled out the form but there are other things I want to share. I will be buying a cx-30 for a few reasons. NO touch screen. NO cvt. Great exterior styling. Love the red paint. Great driving dynamics. Small suv. If I needed more room I would buy a bigger Mazda. Beautiful interior. I have researched a lot and for me, nothing else can compare
We all have different needs and preferences. The cx-30 meets all mine. Thanks for the review.
Of course! Thanks for watching! And you're absolutely right: for the people whose needs are met by the CX-30's combination of attributes, they'll likely love it.
Exactly, we purchased our CX30 for the same reasons.
Did you buy one, which model? I have an older CX-5, great car, spacious for pax and cargo. Now considering a smaller car for my wife, and myself...if I get on with the CX-30. Rear seat capacity not an issue for us, probably manage with the smaller boot/trunk.
Have yet to sit in one and test drive, but expect it will 'feel' much more compact than my CX-5 (because of the shallow windows). It will probably be just right for my wife who presently has an even smaller car.
Okay. Done with my research now and there just isn't any other car that interests me as much as the CX-30. Everything I need and nothing I don't. Planning to buy at end of December 2023. Which trim will depend on what I can find or my whim at the time. Hmmm. To turbo or not to turbo.That is the question. Leaning toward a non-turbo premium at the moment.
@@delreed2906 Agree with your choice of Mazda. I don't find Honda, Hyundai, Toyota, Kia, Ford, VW or the premium German cars have attractive styling; it's good that we all have different tastes. I have a turbo diesel CX-5 (great torque) and will need convincing to go for the non turbo petrol CX-30. Colours...I am liking the Machine Grey, Midnight Blue, Soul Red. The dark colurs blend better (help hide) the disproportionate external plastic mouldings. Good luck with finding your chosen CX-30 👍.
I purchased a CX-30 2.5 Select Trim model back in February for $25K, as the dealer took off the destination charge since I was literally taking the vehicle right off of the trailer. I traded in a 2015 Chevy Sonic LS and find that the CX-30 drives like a more sophisticated version of my old car. I enjoy that it still drives like a car instead of a typical SUV and has the added utility of a hatchback design. Compared with the Sonic, it took me a while to get used to some of the updated tech. While it doesn't have a fancy touchscreen interface, the infotainment is a nice upgrade from the base radio in my Sonic (one of the last years to have a radio with real buttons and no backup camera). We don't have children so the back seat space isn't really an issue, and with the rear seat folded I find that it has a pretty decent amount of cargo space. Overall I enjoy the fact that it has excellent driving dynamics and a more luxurious interior for not a whole lot of money, so I find it to be a nice upgrade/compromise from my last car.
Reviewers really need to stop saying that COMPACT vehicles need to stop being COMPACT. If you want a bigger car, just buy a bigger car.
It’s absolutely crazy that reviewers keep telling manufacturers to get rid of their smaller vehicles.
I mean they ALL actually make tons of bigger cars while COMPACT cars are rapidly disappearing.
It’s seriously the silliest thing that so many reviewers review COMPACT cars and critique them for being COMPACT.
Or… it could be because it’s small relative to other vehicles in the same segment that cost less money. Never said there shouldn’t be compact (COMPACT!) vehicles, but there are other brands maximizing the space in the same vehicle footprint.
@@jax1079 The GTI probably has the best use of space. You still get giant men reviewing them & being disappointed that it’s a COMPACT car - lol.
Likewise with the two or 3 subcompacts that are left. Giant man reviewer: Good gosh !!!! This car is SUBCOMPACT !!!! 😉
@@katiecannon8186 I didn't even eat my vegetables growing up...
I agree. I WANT a small suv. Keep making them!!! There is a market for them. If you don’t like it get a bigger car, there are plenty. Some of these review’s annoying me complaining about the size as if that isn’t the point!
@@jax1079 It's not. It's quite in the middle of the class.
I just bought this car today; and was pleasantly surprise for its excellent handling and comfortable ride. It drives like a luxury car, the driving experience feels very stabled and solid on the road. I don't care what anyone says but bumps and uneven road surfaces, not even the most luxury of cars, can't avoid them! I bought the base cloth upholstery model for $24,900! I don't regret buying it! the cargo area while very small; I resolved that issue by folding the back seats flat; so now I have double the space. I highly recommend the Mazda cx-30. My advice is to skip all the extra trimmings; like heated seats, leather seats, sunroofs; and you will be saving tons of money, so stick to the base models!!
I live in a city in the northeast USA and am shopping for a replacement for my 2016 VW Golf. Test-drove the CX30 and it's my ideal: near-premium quality inside and out, driver focused and snug, with a distinctive profile that's less bulky and more nimble than a Taos or a RAV4 (which drives like a bus!) and less expensive than a BMW X1. So for me the CX30 hits the sweet spot. The thing is, it seems that folks in my city are catching on because these days you can't go two blocks without seeing one. The CX30 is EVERYWHERE here and is almost as ubiquitous as the CX5, which has been around far longer. Which speaks to what I think you missed in your review, that the actual target for this vehicle is urban drivers like me in medium and larger cities seeking the smallest possible crossover package to navigate crowded streets and still have a little practicality for good measure. The CX30 has as much storage space as my very practical Golf, with a bit more ground clearance and way more luxury, comfort and tech. And at 5'11' I fit quite comfortably behind my driving position and actually enjoyed the comfort and position of the raised back seat. I'm relieved to find a crossover I can use to zip along narrow city streets with confidence and fit into tight parking spaces. I can't wait to get mine in a couple months!
Sounds like the CX-30 might be perfect for you
I'm 27, 5'-7" and not married (no kids) and in the market for a crossover. I've been tracking the Corolla Cross for a long time and was ready to buy the hybrid that just released but it's at least 4-6 months out at a minimum, at least at dealerships where I live. But Mazda has a great offer of 0.9% APR for 3 years right now and the base trim does the job for me. That makes it considerably cheaper than the Corolla Cross hybrid base trim ($5k cheaper). The corolla cross base trim is the same price as the base CX-30 but I test-drove the 2022 models of both cars and the Mazda was so much better in terms of driving experience. Since the CX-30 has better power (191 hp vs 169 hp), almost similar mileage and it's a little cheaper on the base trims as well I think I'm going to go for the CX-30. My budget is also around $25k so I think I'm gonna go for the CX-30 since it's readily available with a great financing offer at the table right now. Thanks for your review! It helped me confirm my purchase!
Thanks for watching! 🙏🏻 Sounds like it’ll be perfect for you!
Homework complete professor! I own a 2022 CX-30 in the EXACT spec you reviewed. I purchased it pre-owned in January CPO’d. for $33k with 5,000 miles on the clock. For me, as a single dude with a dog, who lives in a city it is the perfect vehicle. This marks the 6th Mazda I’ve owned since 1993 and is the first time in my life I’ve owned one vehicle. I’m looking at a clean 1971 280SL on Monday. Growing up is hard to do. 😂
Interesting… you really fall into the EXACT attributes of this vehicle, which is great for you, but I’m not sure Mazda wants the demo to be quite so narrow 😂 Still, enjoy your turbo! And thanks for watching 🙏🏻
@@jax1079 - Essentially, this vehicle is made for individuals, couples w/o kids (or with small kids) or individuals who would buy something like a Mazda 3, Corolla or Civic but want it somewhat higher. Having given away a Ford Explorer that I drove, I have actually "grown" into this vehicle's size quite well.
@@ccchhhrrriiisss100 That’s a good way of putting it!
This comment might be a little late but in my opinion the CX-30 being the smallest of its competitors can sometimes be a good thing, I personally don't like SUV´s, I've always had cars but just started transitioning into the subcompact category and was looking for something that is not too big, still drives like a car and is sporty looking. I'm also super short so it works perfect for me, I'm glad the CX-30 exists!
I’m actually glad you bring this up. I think a lot of the pushback comments have been treating this like a black and white issue. If the size of the CX-30 works for you then it’s a very satisfying small crossover, but if you’re expecting practical packaging and cargo space, you’ll be disappointed. It’s not for everyone, but for some people it might be perfect.
Picking up a cx30 today. I was between this and an HRV. The HRV would’ve been 4 months out and this one was readily available and after driving both, I really like the non turbo cx30 more than the HRV. It has a little bit more power for highway driving than the HRV which felt really sluggish trying to get onto the highway. I’m also a single dude and I don’t have a Stanley so I think this fits my niche
This is true: the HR-V is catastrophically slow, and the base engine in the CX-30 is definitely superior. I’d say for your use case the CX-30 sounds just about perfect. Thanks for watching 🙏🏻
I'm 6'0" and was able to sit behind myself without any trouble in this vehicle. I'm looking at the base model for affordability, but I would like a turbo so I keep my 0-60 time under 6 seconds. Thanks for your insight, JAX.
No problem! More normal sized people might find the space adequate, especially depending on what stage of life you’re in. For our family of tallish freaks, it’s a no go. Thanks for watching 🙏🏻
This has to be a lie lol. I’m 6’2 and I can’t sit properly behind the mazda cx-5 let alone a 6’0 sitting behind a cx-30
@@alb0zfinest I also have a 32" waist, so I can fit in smaller spaces.
I'm 6'1" and I fit behind myself too in my new CX-30. Now, I wouldn't want to sit in the rear for long; however, it's comfortable for relatively normal driving distances.
It's not as small as many of the reviewers make it out to be. I do wish it was a bit longer like Crosstrek but it can transport four average Europeans (5'10-6) if they are not lardasses.
If you’ve had a problematic CVT-turbo engine (a 37k vehicle reduced to scrap metal)…Mazda is the ONLY choice! What is considered “outdated” by some is SAFE for others!
This is true, but it’s not like CVTs are the ONLY alternative (more common now for sure though). Curious what brand you had before as well since that’s a great cautionary tale. Thanks for watching 🙏🏻
@@jax1079 fair, most manufacturers are moving to the CVT these days to improve horse power & fuel economy (even the mainstream heavy hitters like Honda and Toyota). I had a Hyundai, but similar problems have been reported by Nissan and KIA. Also, Hyundai refused to replace the faulty engine (even with a recall) and there were 60 vehicles in line ahead of mine, not driveable and worthless. 😞
@@Lisa-wu1ld What model Hyundai? There aren’t many that have CVTs. Most have dual clutches if they don’t have a traditional auto.
We should thank sleepy joe for raising the gas mileage standards all the time. But i guess throwing away billion dollar tanks into the useless war in Ukraine isn't causing climate change i guess?
The Stanley drink can fit in the doors well. I use standard 20oz bottles and cans in the center cup holders.
Enjoyed the video, and I think you make some great points. So many thoughts here. Mazda is a brand that I share your love for, and I also fear they are falling behind. Not only is their is brand identity getting a bit lost in the shift up market, but with the impending transition to EVs looming I think many brands are going to get shuffled around. Mazda prioritizing driving dynamics still helps make them distinct, but I am concerned about their ability to compete if they slip too much on the tech side. I’m optimistic that if Mazda can develop an EV that has amazing dynamics they can once again distinguish the brand in that space. Most of the new EVs have a lot of power, but you hear very little about good driving dynamics in EVs for the most part. I hear a lot of “adequate” steering and handling. So I think there is room for Mazda to let that be something that sets them apart, but they can’t let the tech fall too far behind. I think for many, driving dynamics fall into a “nice to have” tie-breaker, but too many compromises can break the deal.
Very curious to hear the results of your survey. Is it getting broadcast beyond this channel? I’d assume most people that regularly watch RUclips channels about cars are enthusiasts, which would likely skew your results in favor of driving dynamics.
Thanks! I’m totally with you: I absolutely love Mazda and everything they stand for, so I want to see them win. However, the market is the market, and to stay viable they’re going to have to do a better job catering to what people actually want. That’s why I made a video a while back saying they should just make SUVs and the Miata. They’ve proven they can do it better than everyone else (CX-5), so they should double down on that for profitability. Fingers crossed the CX-90 is good… 🤞🏻
Really loving having Meghan's perspective on a regular basis!
So the Mazda has 250 hp, drives great and costs $25K... sounds like a half-price base Porsche Macan? Except it's tiny! I had no idea how small they were😬 Beautiful cinematography as usual!
You can’t get the killer engine until you step up into the $30k range quite a bit, which is a shame. A stripped turbo might be a hot seller 😂
@@jax1079 In case you missed it, low to mid 30s is less than the average price people pay for cars in 2023. So having to go that “high” for the magnificent 250hp turbo is a good value, if not a downright bargain.
@@sandsmarc You’re not wrong, but that’s nuts. The fact that we live in this world is bonkers.
I don't know how tall you are but I am a little above average and I can sit in the front and in the back behind myself not that it would ever happen. It wouldn't be great for a long trip in the back seat at my height but it is as much room as a plane if not more so I'd say the limit would be about 2-3 hours in the back
Just spent a week in the non-turbo. The handling dynamics are there but oddly, found the transmission quite confused versus the crisp shifting experience of the 3. I think this kinda only competes with the 3 as it looks to be outselling it 2 to 1 despite not driving as well and having no extra space. The AWD system is pretty good though and the higher seating position and better ride comfort steal 3 buyers. It kinda stands alone making cross shopping it a little silly. The Crosstrek and Seltos prove you can actually have real interior space without blowing up the outside like the HR-V did. Excellent commentary! And enjoy Mrs Jax’s, I mean Meghan’s, thoughts.
Meanwhile...back at the ranch Mazda sold over 8k of these last month which was it's best month ever so...there is that. This model has only existed for 3 yrs and 4 months. It's catching on slowly as is the NEW Mazda, which rebooted its entire brand only what 8, or 9 years ago. They're trying to change a reputation they spent 75 years building. That's hard to do and won't change easily but it's happening.
Mazda doesn't have time for that. They are one of the smallest independent automakers on the planet. They need vehicles to succeed the way the CX-5 has succeeded. They need the CX-90 to be a smash (and it looks like it). Otherwise, they need to hope a giant like Toyota swallows them up and allows them to be the premium performance arm of the company.
@JAX Automotive I don't agree. Since they are small they don't have to sell a million units. They can have less profitability and survive as long as they can stay away from losing money with recalls, or class action suits. Plus, it's not like the CX30 is failing. It's increasing sales all the time. The customer they are targeting isn't a family man per se. It's someone who wants a stylish, more premium product/experience, and is willing to pay a little more to get it. They are strategically placing themselves a little above the mainstream and a little lower than the luxury class. That's their niche. Is it working? I think so but the economy has had several hiccups lately that has slowed their progress. Will electrification be their demise? Maybe, but I don't believe that will take off unless it is mandated by corrupt politicians.
Great subcompact crossover with a fairly luxe interior, great driving dynamics and willing powertrain. I like your review style. I also am bored with graphite grey metallic EVERYWHERE but Mazda does this color wonderfully. Like you though I found it just a bit too compact for my needs as my next car for a decade or so. Went with the Impreza RS and am very happy with its comfort, room and driving dynamics for my everyday needs. My first CVT (my other car is a WRX) and it drives fine. I’ve figured out its nuances- stomping it for 0-60 runs will frustrate you, but ease into it firmly after a second or two yields a respectable eagerness.
Solid choice, and awd to boot. Glad to hear you like it. Thanks for watching 🙏🏻
my homework submission: just got a CPO 22 turbo premium for $29k with only 1.4k miles (ex-test drive unit). I won’t consider it at its full price ($35k…)
Back seats are indeed so small for a “SUV” but I don’t care lol. I am paying the car not my passengers. If they don’t like it they could go take the bus 🚌
Nice! I like the way you think!
I own a older 2007 mazda 3 and this is a great review and i have to agree this being my first car ive owned its great. Bought it used but overall its a solid car and i have to agree with this review.
Thanks for watching 🙏🏻
I like the look of the cx30. Front and side. But they do need to come with the tech.
Oh and Megan Automotive has a nice ring to it
And fast. Thanks for watching 🙏🏻
I have the carbon edition and I love it. My wife and I don't have children but we do have small dogs. Rear space is not an issue for us for this reason. Compared to our 2012 mazda3 1.8 liter 155 hp, the cx 30 base engine is a turbo so it didn't make sense to add more money to the price. Handling is still great even with the torsion beam. I have had a Mazda since 1989 amd they keep getting better and better. Would like better gas mileage so will eventually get a PHEV.
Nice! Sounds like you’re the perfect customer for the CX-30! I’m a big Mazda fan, myself, but I’d love to see the CX-30 become ever so slightly more usable in its next iteration. Then again, I’m in a gorgeous red Mazda3 this week and I don’t care about the space at all. 😂
@JAX Automotive I agree. I would love a larger gas tank also. Not sure why they didn't make it a tad larger. Still has more pros than cons though. It is our inexpensive premium/luxury vehicle.
We're a short family, tallest is 5'9 3/4 inches. Not worried about legroom in the back.
Should be all good 👍🏻
As a tall-ish guy (6'2") with a 35" inseam, I'm curious to see more videos of you fitting yourself into cars so I know which ones will fit me.
Definitely try to highlight it in pretty much every vehicle we have to test. Tall people have to look out for one another! Well, that and my girls are 6'1" and 5'11", so it's relevant to my family for sure!
@@jax1079 well I have liked and subscribed so keep em coming!
Great review! You nailed everything I consider important right away good and bad. It’s not a CVT but only a six speed, etc.
And a bit on the small side, haha!
I want to be nice here, but I have to say this review didn't make a lot of sense. This is a Japanese designed subcompact SUV. No, it doesn't have enough space for every conceivable situation. It is the smallest SUV in their lineup. If you need something bigger, then there are alternatives within the Mazda lineup or elsewhere. Horses for courses. Not only that, but you picked the most expensive model and implied that this is what most people would really want or need. Not true. The standard engine is more than adequate and has better acceleration than the base engines of most of its competitors. The Mazda 6-speed transmission is one of its best attributes. Why? Because it is a proven unit and one of the best bets for long-term reliability in the entire automotive industry. There are a lot of transmissions, especially CVT''s, that are known to be problematic or have a big question mark when it comes to reliability. If long-term reliability doesn't concern you, then lease whatever you like best and return it while the drivetrain is still under warranty.
I have a 2023 Mazda 3 with a manual transmission and the standard engine. It has plenty of power for road use and I can sit in the back seat in perfect comfort. If you are 6' 6" and you want to haul a basketball team or go on a vacation to Wally World with a three teenaged children, then get something bigger. That's why they make more than one model.
I get what you’re saying. My thought is this: there are a number of compelling alternatives that offer more space and practicality in the same exterior footprint for less money. That’s not great from a competition standpoint, and as a fan of Mazda, I want to see them succeed. I’m not sure design and dynamics is enough to trump value for a lot of non enthusiast buyers. The CX-5 succeeds because it’s priced in line with the competition and only slightly smaller, but the CX-30 is priced way above the competition in loaded trim despite lacking cooled seats, wireless CarPlay, and a pano roof… all “luxury” features that would help justify the price. And it’s SIGNIFICANTLY smaller, not just a little smaller.
That being said, I’m perfectly happy being an irrational and hypocritical idiot: I’m currently driving a Mazda3 Turbo hatch that costs $37k and I don’t care because it’s freaking gorgeous.
I enjoy you wife's very straight forward honest comments.
She has no filter 😂
I'll be replacing my 2012 Mazda3 hatchback later this year. I drive 70 miles of freeway and one mile of crummy dirt road every day. (This winter's storms beat the shit out of the road and my car.) I haven't had anybody in the backseat since 2014 and keep the seats folded down all the time. I've been looking at prospects and even the Mazda CX5 looks too big. The CX30 looks perfect, except for the lack of a Manual Transmission.
You’re literally the EXACT customer for this car, and you’ll probably love it. Thanks for watching 🙏🏻
Mazda offers something different to buyers. They are betting their strategy catches on. Consider the alternative they face. They could make a more spacious subcompact that looks and drives like everything else but then why would anyone choose a Mazda? The fact is Honda, Toyota, and Subaru already occupy that space and have a head start of about 30-40 years in good reputation and brand desireability. Their strategy is wise because they have their own niche. Now they have to just stay consistent and eventually they'll break through...they hope. I think they will. Their cars are different but the road to failure would be to do what their competitors are doing. You seem to be suggesting they do that, but that's not really an option.
No, I'm suggesting they inject their substantial Mazda DNA and identity into a more usable package. If driving dynamics was enough to entice buyers, then companies like BMW would still be shouting "ultimate driving machine" and offering manual transmissions across the board. There's a reason BMW has moved away from that and is now making hideous, tech-laden, SUVs and EVs: it's what the market wants, it's what sells, it's what brings in the profits. Mazda should always be Mazda, but it's a problem when their primary competitors are all offering substantially more usable space at a far more affordable price. If the CX-30 was only slightly smaller than the HR-V and Corolla Cross, it would be understandable, but it's quite a bit smaller. Even optioned in a lower trim with the prices being more even, the usability will a compromise that most small families won't want to make. With car prices skyrocketing, a young family might need a vehicle like this because a larger SUV is out of the question. Trust me, they need space more than they need dynamics.
@@jax1079 I don't think Mazda is trying to compete with Toyota, Honda, Subaru or Koreans in sales. They are trying to be more premium, all around quality, great driving dynamics brand. All they need is convert 5-10% of other brands customers combined with their own loyal customer and they'll be ok. Not everyone cares for hybrids or EVs yet they definitely have carefully mapped out their hybrid/EV timeline for next 5 - 7 years. They may be a little late with hybrid and EVs but if they can retain the same high quality and driving dynamics with decent practicality they will gradually continue to ascend towards the top. Their Rwd inline 6 architecture could be a game changer for them if they execute on it well.
I disagree about the CX-30 needing to "grow up", as going larger would mean losing much of it's appeal. As an owner of a 2021 Mazda 3 turbo hatch I consider the CX-30 as a Mazda 3 variant, nothing more than that. If car buyers would simply ignore Mazda marketing this thing as a crossover and take it for what it really is, (Mazda 3 with a lift kit, slightly different body/interior) then I think it would not only sell much better, people wouldn't expect it to be something it isn't. The next gen CX-30 needs Mazda's new 8 speed trans (already exists on the CX-70/90) and an available hybrid drivetrain, better infotainment...that's pretty much it, and same goes for the next Mazda 3. I hope Mazda doesn't try to compete with everything else in the segment by making it larger and boxy...that's not what Mazda is about.
Homework done.! Hello Meghan!
Thanks!
This video was sponsored by HONDA!! you forgot to say this..
The check hasn’t cleared yet… just wait
Go back to California where people cry when someone glares at them. The CX-30 is perfect in any form for normal people.
I kicked out of Cali for my testosterone being too high.
CVT's suck.... My Wife's Toyota CHR CVT started making noise at 67K miles, Toyota quoted $10,500 to replace.... Dumped it on Carmax.
That’s unfortunate but somewhat unusual and not typical of most Toyota CVT transmissions
Toyota Corolla Cros cvt issues?
This is a super weird comparison, but what do you think the size difference is between this and a toyota rav4 2012?
Well, the 2012 RAV4 is listed at over 36 cubic feet of cargo space while this is only 20 cubic feet. That's a MASSIVE difference in vehicles of this size. The RAV4 also has significantly more rear seat room compared to this, especially if anyone involved is tall. Hope that helps!
I was considering the CX-30, but ... the VINs all start with 3 now, not J. No way, Jose.
Ok
No. That is what the CX-50, CX-90 and coming soon CX-70 are for. The CX-30 is about the size of the Crosstrek. If you are only interested in practical, buy the Corolla Cross or HR-V. The best value CX-30 is Preferred or Carbon Edition. Even the base engine is more powerful than the competition.
Somewhat agree. There is a LOT to love about the CX-30, but… it still needs to at least pretend to be practical, which it doesn’t. That’s why I just reviewed the Mazda3 and said I loved it way more: as a car, it’s great! The CX-5 is already small for the class, and the CX-30 is significantly smaller still.
@@jax1079 I think it is practical for single or couple that enjoy driving. The CX-5 isn't really fun to drive. My wife has a 2019 Mazda CX-3 and it is even smaller. Sold our POS 2013 Crosstrek. We looked at everything in the compact and sub-compact SUV class and she liked it the best. It is great for running around town. Great handling and easy to park. probably going to replace my 2017 Civic EX-T with the CX-30.
Mazda literally has 4 other vehicles that grow in size.... with marginal price increases by size......what was the point of this video? The CX-30 is small for people that want a smaller car. If you wanted a bigger one get the CX-50 or CX-5. Not hard....
It’s small when compared to vehicles in the same class. Thought that was obvious….
It looks nice. Feels like Mazda wants to compete with Acura. I think Mazda has a identity crisis. Small and premium don’t go hand in hand. In a way I don’t think they can compete with Toyota or Honda or Koreans, so their schtick is to claim they are premium. Premium front wheel drive tiny. Lol. I take a RAV-4 over any Mazda.
I agree. I freaking LOVE Mazda, but the “zoom zoom” branding just isn’t the move anymore. With companies like BMW distancing themselves from their ultimate driving machine image to focus more on tech and the future, being a brand known for performance isn’t going to make up for some of the shortcomings like it used to. It sucks for sure, but we’ve seen Honda moving away from this as well, and sadly, I think it’s going to be a good move for them (since Toyota had a bit of a head start in the practicality image).
@@jax1079 Mazda is more comparable to Alfa Romeo than to BMW. They have said it themselves quite openly that they want to be Japanese Alfa.
Alfa Romeo's do not have all the modern gadgets and fads current german cars have but when it comes to driving and looks they beat everything in their respective class. I'd take Alfa Romeo over any of the germans without a blink of an eye.
And this is what sets CX30 apart from the competition. Great design, no fugly ipad sticking out of the dash, great interior, and what's most important, driving. After driving most of the competition recently went back to CX30 for a second look, and bought it immediately afterwards. The driving experience is just so relaxing and natural in this car. Great linear feedback, the car is predictable, everything is driver focused, no annoying gadgets, and quiet cabin. Yes, it's not the biggest in class and Mazda has obviously sacrificed a lot of practicality for design and driving dynamics but in the end for me it won out because I do have to take quite long drives, often on curvy country roads and this thing is just so much more fun to drive. My wife has a same class KIA and there's just no comparison.
Where in the world are you getting $6k difference with an HRV?
The window sticker
@@jax1079 Base Mazda $23k, AWD, Keyless Entry, Alloy Wheels. Base Corolla Cross $23.7k. Front Wheel drive, no keyless entry, steel wheels.
Jaxx, you were being unduly harsh and negative towards the Mazda CX-30. First of all, you have to admit that you're extremely tall. Even the example you used of 6 foot is too tall. The average adult American male is 5'9-5'10. Average adult American female is 5'4. Your wife is 5 inches taller than the average American woman. No wonder both of you found the backseats to be useless and the interior to be cramped! Most Americans will find the backseats useful and sufficient, especially for a sub-compact crossover. The majority of Americans are much shorter than you and your wife. Please realize that & review cars accordingly.
You also kept mentioning how expensive the turbo model is in comparison to the Honda HRV but even the base 191 hp Mazda CX-30 engine is a lot more powerful than the 158 hp and CVT in the HRV. TheTopher said it took him almost 13 seconds to do zero to 60 in the 2023 HRV and that's with him alone in the car! Horrible! The HRV loaded down with family and cargo would take over 15 seconds! CX-30 with base engine has a zero to 60 of 8 seconds. Mazda CX-30 in the lower trims is also very price competitive with the HRV and Taos and arguably more luxurious than both of them. In fact, Mazda dealers are much more likely to sell you a new Mazda for MSRP or below MSRP as compared to Honda dealers. Honda dealers are notorious for making you pay for pro-pack and market adjustment. Taos has a turbocharged engine which is not good for long term reliability.
I get where you're coming from, but I worry that Mazda's focus on driving dynamics starts to become irrelevant in many consumers' eyes when you get down into the same price bracket as the HR-V and Corolla Cross. Topher is right: the HR-V is slow as balls, but... I wasn't the least bit bothered by it in day to day driving when I had it. People will choose practicality over zest if they have ANY practical needs (such as children). And you're right about the Taos having a turbo engine, which is concerning for long term reliability... but the cool CX-30 is cool BECAUSE it has a turbo. (I would still lean Mazda, though because German reliability is an oxymoron of the highest degree)
As for height... well, you're not wrong, but we generally fit in most mainstream vehicles just fine, and I point out if the seat adjustment specifically renders the rear seat useless. Megan actually likes to drive with her legs more extended than me, so she usually leaves the seat where it is. At 5'9" she's the same height as an average dude, so I would argue that the CX-30 is still on the small side even for average people. Thanks for watching!
@@jax1079 Thanks for the detailed response! I do agree that the other options are more practical than the CX-30 and that could indeed lead to declining sales. And yes, the CX-30 is cozy even for average people unfortunately.
5'9" w/29" inseam. I test drove and also tried that back seat. The back seat wasn't happening for my legs or head. It was comical looking at the salesman crammed back there during the test drive. Fun car to drive for two max. Useless back seats. Another dislike, the rear is one big blindspot. Poor vis out of the little slits/windows.
I liked driving the CX30 and the perceived reliability of the NA 2.5 with automatic trans. The back seat was the deal breaker.
New BMWs look downright ugly inside and outside with their new horrible design language. Only brands that have a decent design comparable to new Mazdas are Alfa Romeo and Jaguar.
Also what other car has interior quality equal or better to Mazda in this class? Recently drove most of them and there's no competition. Crosstrek is only one that isn't fucking ugly and horrible inside. It's not great but relatively bearable compared to others like Toyota, KIA, WV or Honda.
Quality and design/materials are two different things: the Honda HR-V’s interior quality and materials are as good as the CX-30, and the design isn’t much worse at all. In fact, I’d argue that the HR-V’s interior is equal to if not superior to the CX-30’s interior, but the HR-V’s exterior design is fugly. But if you’re after USABLE space and practicality, the HR-V is much, much better.
@@jax1079 I do agree that Mazda has sacrificed some practicality to design for driving dynamics. In this regard I wish it was a bit longer and higher like Crosstrek. But Honda is not competitive, imho. They do not even have back seat vents and they have been saving money by cutting out the back seat center arm rest!
I ❤ Megan 😂
Started out good but went south once she started speaking. Edit JAX, edit.
I bet you're a hit with the ladies.
idk how ur wife has the seat that far back, im 511 and i can easily fit behind where i have my seat lol
She likes to drive with her toes, and she’s made up of mostly legs. 😂
Lol I sincerely don’t think your wife is target audience for this vehicle. Most wives like much bigger SUVs. This is more for poor youngish men.
She didn’t mind the Lexus NX (review on Sunday) but she just felt like the Mazda FEELS really small (which is true).