Ektachrome 100D filmed using a Krasnogorsk 3 converted to Ultra 16.

My friend Carlos got a new motorcycle. We use that as an excuse to shoot a roll of Ektachrome 100D using a K3. I forgot the light meter; some images are out of focus, and I noticed some weird jerking on the images. I'll talk about those details in another "behind the scenes" or commentary video soon.
Thanks for watching.
Camera: Krasnogorsk 3
Film: Ektachrome 100D
Lab: The Negative Space.

[@lougonzmart9466]

Qué belleza de imágenes.

[@TheCinematographyLab]

Gracias Lou!

[@holamoteros]

Felicitaciones 🎉

[@TheCinematographyLab]

Gracias!

[@jothlorien]

Buen trabajo! Estaría bien ver un "detras de las cámaras" en una filmación como ésta. Saludos.

[@TheCinematographyLab]

¡Gracias Joth! Hice algunas tomas con una GoPro y mi teléfono ese día. Espero tener pronto una especie de detrás de cámaras con comentarios de lo que hicimos en la filmación. Saludos.

[@stranstudio]

Very nice 👍🏻

[@TheCinematographyLab]

Thank you!

[@thousandoaksmall1995]

Really cool vibe. Good job.

[@TheCinematographyLab]

Glad you like it!

[@DethronerX]

Looks really good and good work on the post.
Although 16mm is in the middle of 8mm and 35mm, it looks close to 35, rather than to 8, really crazy how much excellent it looks

[@TheCinematographyLab]

Thanks a lot! Super 8 is the new 16. Film stocks like 50D and 100D have so much detail that they look like their old siblings now. I've seen modern Super 8 that looks better than 16mm from the 90s. 16mm, if properly shot, can compete with 35mm too. Modern scanners can capture a lot of detail, which helps a lot.

[@Jesuslovesfilm2121]

Buffalo 66 Film stock. Well…sorta same chemistry but very similar look and feel.

[@TheCinematographyLab]

Wow! That's true! I just watched the trailer and it looks similar. The highlights of reversal film stock are peculiar for sure. Thanks for sharing that info.

[@Jesuslovesfilm2121]

@@TheCinematographyLab we love film & cinema!!! Always refreshing and fun to share our knowledge!

[@cinemazeta]

Muy bueno, no hay nada como el ektachrome.

[@TheCinematographyLab]

Si, bonito el Ektachrome.
Gracias por tus comentarios en el "en vivo", Seba. Por cierto, el material no fue estabilizado para nada por cierto. La camara esta buena en ese sentido; hay que revisarla aver porque quedaron muchas imagenes fuera de foco. La exposición quedo pasada porque olvidamos el medidor de luz y tuvimos que usar una app que al parecer no es tan precisa.
Gracias por compartir tu conocimiento en temas de cine. Siempre es bueno escucharte hablar de esos temas y de tu filosofía de vida. Saludos.
Rubén.

[@cinemazeta]

@@TheCinematographyLab El original proyectado debe verse genial. Qué afortunado en poseer una K3 que funciona tan bien y no tironea. Un placer la charla.

[@I.O.M.]

Looks great!

[@TheCinematographyLab]

Thanks!

[@truefilm6991]

Looks fantastic on my cell phone! Yes a couple of shots are out of focus, happened to me with the Zenitar 16, but the rest is awesome! I will watch again on my PC tomorrow.

[@TheCinematographyLab]

Thanks Christian! Yeah, it's hard to tell what is in focus in the viewfinder of the K3. I'll shoot some tests later, to try to determine if it was my mistake or if the camera needs alignment. Thanks for watching.

[@truefilm6991]

@@TheCinematographyLab in my case it was me. It's hard working with prime lenses with the K-3. I know my mistake. I was rushing the shot and set the lens at 35meters distance, thinking it was 3.5 meters.