@@cryalot378 people should only use AI to solve problems creatively. Not to replace things. But companies focus on money. They can earn more money by replacing people.
@@TheKing-bq4ez Brother...this movie came out in 2007. CGI was used in Star Wars: A New Hope which came out in the '60's. CGI has been around way longer than you think.
I love it too. Looked more comic accurated to his first appereances where he wasn't giant like Venom these days. Originally Venom didn't gain any size but was just size of Eddie Brock.
This movie is my favorite movie cuz of the villains only and the reunion of Harry and Peter. Venom looks more like a horror villian than an ordinary villian
Don’t care what anyone saids this is the most creative venom outfit of all time. This venom would freak a lot of people with this day in age technology
@@powergamingyt2662 personally I prefer this one over the current one, mainly cause I grew up with these movies BUT I would like to see that “comic book venom” without a host more, cause that thing was like 20 feet tall and sound the monster from The Thing 1982
A lot people don't know 2:41 Avi Arad is to blame hate he interfered Sam vision put Venom in because if he wanted fans to like Spider-Man 3 even more put in our favorite character Venom but Sam doesn't know Venom and he said something like he tried to make it work it didn't go well Sam was unhappy how he made Spider-Man 3 and he decided not to make Spider-Man 4 2011 If Sam just had creative control with Spider-Man like he did with the first and second it would have been awesome then Sam would have made Spider-Man 4 2011 In Spider-Man 3 Sam wanted Sandman and Harry Osborne is the new Goblin as a villain
this venom is actually more scary looking than the Tom Hardy version.. more dark and I will begging for more from this 2007 version.. Tom hardy version is quite funny and ridiculous at the same time, will be a good partner with Deadpool
@@TheBatman667Exactly, bro. Topher may not be the greatest in everyone’s opinion, but he is way better than that annoying Venom played by Tom Hardy. Tom Hardy’s Venom is a joke. I dislike him because he lacks being scary, terrifying or serious which is a very important part of his character, and overall he is too goofy which is very annoying. Ugh!
I get that Venom was a studio inclusion because of Avi Arad and with Sam already doing Sandman mostly, it was hard to put him in the original story Sam had planned. So with rewrites and reworks, Venom was included. But that of course came with problems of its own with the reception of the movie, Topher and just Venom all together. Spider-Man 3 has a weird place in my heart. Back then I loved it because I was a lil kid enjoying my favorite hero on the big screen, but as the years progressed I became so much more critical of it. Now though, I’ve grown to appreciate it and what it brought. This Venom actually scared me more than any adaptation we’ve gotten so far. I remember having nightmares for like two nights after watching this movie because of the design and sounds of Venom which were done fantastically to make him really Alien. It’s a shame we’ll never see the REAL Venom Sam Raimi wanted for this movie that included a Venom LITERALLY tearing at Eddie Brock, ripping his skin and flesh off as he became more parasitic and alien as well as the original ending with there being a venom skull after he and Eddie died
This film has a lot of potential, but the big problem is that everything was "optimized", and so they ended up cutting out interesting things. When Sony re-released the Spider-Man films, I thought they would add scenes that were cut at the time, but no, they missed an opportunity to improve the film
Some people hate Spider-Man 3 but they don't know Avi Arad is to blame hate he should have left Sam's script alone and let Sam do his original plans with Sandman and Harry Osborne Side Story finally being completed with his death because of the Venom in it caused Harry to be sidelined
"The person I really want to please is me, because I read these comic books." Oh Topher 😭💔💔 Tbh all this time, he doesn't talk about it much, and has said that he probably won't come back in the past, and I've always kinda felt like it was because of this. Like, he LOVED this character and it was a passion, and it was chewed up and spit out, and I can't imagine how devastating that would be.
I love how much of a clash that is with Andrew. When Andrew was cast to play spider-man he said "you realize the suit isn't yours, you're just wearing it. The character still belongs to the fans".
This Venom deserve to be a main Villian like the Green Goblin or Doc Ock was. I mean this Venom would be a real menace to Peter and all People of NYC. Peter's spidersenses didn't work against Venom. What pissed me off back in the day is that Venom only appear at the end of the and then he died...
i always felt like the sam raimi spider man movies really felt like a comic coming to life! it was so amazing watching them in theaters the hype was real!!
I found out Sam doesn't know Venom and he never wanted in his movie but he said something like he tried to make it work it didn't go well but I found out 2:41 Avi Arad interfered Sam vision put Venom in because if he wanted fans to like Spider-Man 3 even more put in our favorite character Venom and sell toys but Sam doesn't know Venom he was unhappy how he made Spider-Man 3 and he decided not to make Spider-Man 4 2011 If Sam just had creative control with Spider-Man 3 like he did with the first and second it would have been awesome then Sam would have made Spider-Man 4 2011 In Spider-Man 3 Sam originally wanted Sandman and Harry Osborne is the new Goblin as a villain
@@robertrodriguez1287you’re right. Spider man 3 was originally supposed to be sandman and harry osborne as the villains. But they forced Sam to add venom when the film was already done
I think topher grace should be from Spiderman 1 to build his personality as Eddie Brock, like animated series and then if was supposed to be in that movie he'll have his traumatic experience character
It’s funny when they say Spider-Man 3 and venom was the worst. Hell no this movie was the best all 3 of them were awesome. If your a true fan you know 👍
I cant help but think of ' The Mask ' (1994). Venom is essentially playing the same role as the mask. We also see in that film what happens when power gets in the wrong hands. Peter Parker = Stanley Ipkiss & Eddie Brock = Dorian Tyrell.
Since I was little he's my favorite Venom I like his design his build as athletic but more muscular than Spiderman I remember when I was little, my brother and I called him the evil Spider-Man.
I really love this venom design. It got 3 things missing that could make him perfect, a few inches of height, big muscles and a deeper voice like the one used on marvel’s Spider-Man 2
I really loved the face of venom 2007 and the attitude the aggression… the only thing that made me disappointed is the screen time and that he is like the same size as Peter. But still better than Tom Hardy’s comedian clown venom. This one was just a monster 👹
Originally Venom wasn't 8 foot monster like modern versions. Originally he was just size of Eddie Brock. Sure Eddie Brock was bigger and more buff than Peter but he wasn't 8 foot giant like Venom is these days.
This movie is a masterpiece, curse all the haters for taking spiderman 4 away. Even with raimi not wanting to do venom, you could see he was still putting his all into the character. As well as Topher grace being super excited for the role, he must've been heartbroken to see all the lashback from fans in 2007. He's not the comic accurate build, but he's the perfect yin-yang to parker in the raimi movies.
Truly the most underrated and most unappreciated villain in Marvel cinematic history. There's no way you can convince that Tom Hardy's adaptation was better in capturing the essence of Venom. You can't have a Venom w/o any tides to Peter Parker. Sony dropped the ball again and Hardy is a heck of a talent, just was just doomed from the start unfortunately due to terrible storytelling. Topher's Venom was robbed due to lack of screen time, just like Leto's Joker. This Venom was an absolute masterclass and would thrive nowadays if it was brought back somehow.
I prefer the symbiote animations in Spider-Man 3 to the venom movies. The ones in the venom movies aren’t bad but they look too much like black water and here it actually looks like living sludge.
For it being the first on screen venom you couldn’t do it better this was a building block for the venom we have now Sam raimi and his staff really did there homework
Topher was great bc he and Toby share similar traits. Both kinda of nerdy, goofy, but topher brought some swagger and cockiness to his character while also believing that this Eddie also got bullied and picked on in highschool.
Ahh yes 12 year old me watching this in theater and had the shit scared out of me with this venom. The squeals and screams of venom and that jump scare where venom drops down above Peter and picks him up by his head terrified me 😂 just wish his voice was a little bit deeper and maybe a little more muscular and it would have been perfect. And more screen time. Venom is in my top 3 Spider-Man villain list. Along side goblin and doc ock
Suddenly, he doesn’t seem so bad after they turn Tom Hardy’s version into a joke. You hear that folks? Eric Foreman is actually the more serious and terrifying Venom.
As a kid I liked it, but I also liked SW Attack of the Clones too. It wasnt until I grew up and noticed how *flawed* it all was. Sometimes nostalgia can really blind you from that.
I literally just watched the whole trilogy last night and then this comes on my feed. World works in mysterious ways😂 but definitely my favorite venom interaction 🔥🔥
So much work involved and attention to the Venom design details, I love it. That being said, there are a few details missing with this Venom. Obviously the size difference compared to Spider-Man, the menacing deep voice, and the way he talks(we instead of I). The size difference I could look past that for this version, but as for the other two I don’t know why they chose to ignore them.
Guys Spider-Man 3 was meant Sandman and Harry Osborne is the new Goblin as a villain but 2:41Stupid Avi Arad ruined it he interfered Sam vision put Venom in because if he wanted fans to like Spider-Man 3 even more put in our favorite character Venom and sell toys but Sam doesn't know Venom he said something like he tried to make it work it didn't go well Sam was unhappy how he made Spider-Man 3 with Venom to the story and Sam decided not to make Spider-Man 4 2011 If Sam just had creative control with Spider-Man 3 like he did with the first and second it would have been awesome then Sam would have made Spider-Man 4 2011
@@robertrodriguez1287 Avi Arad saved Spider-Man 3, he understands venom more than Song itself does that’s why he put him in the 3rd spider-man film because he’s been reading comic books since before you were born
The movie was always going to have three villains. Vulture was the original one but Sam didn't like how he felt so disconnected, they threw the idea of Venom in and after the draft was written he liked it and was on board. Stop spreading false information.
Vulture was supposed to be third antagonist in the movie. If I'm not mistaken, the whole "Peter let Spider-Man popularity get in his head" was always part of the plot, same with making Flint the man responsible for Ben's death. Avi Arad pushed for Venom because of his popularity and Raimi didn't want Venom because at the time, and yes, I know he "clarified" it, but he was adamant about how he hated the character. Anyway, aside from being forced to include Venom, any misstep the movie had was on Raimi as he did the script. I like the movie, by the way, but there are things that could've been better. As for Spider-Man 4, Sony wanted for May 2011, but the scripts weren't good enough, so Raimi walked away from the project because he knew he couldn't make the movie on time and Sony went with plan B that ended up being The Amazing Spider-Man
Not to hate on Hardy’s venom, it was fun. But this venom was in my opinion, more realistic. It could have some improvements for sure but I think it looked the best. That being said a perfect mix of both would be awesome. Topher Grace as Eddie I think is way better (also actually like the comics) the deep voice in Hardy’s venom, the size of Hardy’s venom, but everything else from this venom and I think it would be perfect
The way the movie should have ended was Venom screaming and doing into the camera. Then set that up for Spiderman 4. The studio screwed that movie up big time. But that is what you get when you have people who only know business, only care about business, and profit margins.
The only reason this design works is because this Eddie Brock is meant to act as a foil to Peter, all around an excellent interpretation of the character when you examine the context of the film he appears in.
yeah bozo! hardy's venom is comic accurate because he has personality, because venom is not just cold hearted monster and he never teams up to kill spider-man
Find a video that saids The untold story of Sam Raimi canceled Spider-Man 4 Cutshort (and watch it) There was a line that said Sam wanted Sandman and Harry no Venom in the movie 2:41 Avi Arad forced Sam put Venom in but Sam doesn't know Venom
Sacrifices made old movies better than today.
Now you just put dots on yourself and the computer does everything
Now you just write words and the AI does things for you (it's bad obviously).
@@cryalot378 people should only use AI to solve problems creatively. Not to replace things. But companies focus on money. They can earn more money by replacing people.
@@timestamplease yeah :/ it sucks
Just laziness
Hearing Venom’s screech for the first time after Peter pulls Eddie out left shivers down my spine as a kid
Follow the cold shivers down your spine
@@Latinspidey98👹
I agree
@@Latinspidey98IM RIGHT HERE!
@@JIMANGRYFOOTCOMICSdid you think it was coincidence?
The fact that, this cgi in this movie still hold up until this days 🔥
It's Still don't make up for Spider-Man 3 Shit story!
@@StanvilleBrown Facts.
@@StanvilleBrown I personally love the story of Spider-Man 3.
this was before cgi
@@TheKing-bq4ez Brother...this movie came out in 2007. CGI was used in Star Wars: A New Hope which came out in the '60's. CGI has been around way longer than you think.
i dont care what people say, i love that venom design
1:14 me too
Same
I love it too. Looked more comic accurated to his first appereances where he wasn't giant like Venom these days. Originally Venom didn't gain any size but was just size of Eddie Brock.
fr. loved it way more than the curent one ngl.
Same. Topher's venom is over hated a lot.
looks a million times better than i remember, especially the body horror of the alien
I really enjoyed this version of venom, I just wish he had his own movie as the main villain.
Me too
Same
Mcu
I GOT YOUUUUUUUUUUUUU
Yeah
@@Garfield_knowswhereyouliveMcu hasn’t got anything they let down everyone.
Old Raimi Trilogy CGI and Devs Team>>>>>>Today Marvel
Makes modern CGI look like a video game
That's the thing, Raimi was using the least amount of CGI. He preferred real-life acting. Ofc it wasn't always possible to apply.
This movie is my favorite movie cuz of the villains only and the reunion of Harry and Peter. Venom looks more like a horror villian than an ordinary villian
Don’t care what anyone saids this is the most creative venom outfit of all time. This venom would freak a lot of people with this day in age technology
@@powergamingyt2662 personally I prefer this one over the current one, mainly cause I grew up with these movies BUT I would like to see that “comic book venom” without a host more, cause that thing was like 20 feet tall and sound the monster from The Thing 1982
A lot people don't know 2:41 Avi Arad is to blame hate he interfered Sam vision put Venom in because if he wanted fans to like Spider-Man 3 even more put in our favorite character Venom but Sam doesn't know Venom and he said something like he tried to make it work it didn't go well Sam was unhappy how he made Spider-Man 3 and he decided not to make Spider-Man 4 2011 If Sam just had creative control with Spider-Man like he did with the first and second it would have been awesome then Sam would have made Spider-Man 4 2011 In Spider-Man 3 Sam wanted Sandman and Harry Osborne is the new Goblin as a villain
this venom is actually more scary looking than the Tom Hardy version.. more dark and I will begging for more from this 2007 version.. Tom hardy version is quite funny and ridiculous at the same time, will be a good partner with Deadpool
its kinda sad that this is closer to the comics version than the tom hardy movies were hes supposed to main character
Topher grace venom was edgy and serious. Meanwhile Tom Hardy venom was goofy,funny and childish
@@TheBatman667 Kind of like Ruffalo's Hulk
@@TheBatman667Exactly, bro. Topher may not be the greatest in everyone’s opinion, but he is way better than that annoying Venom played by Tom Hardy. Tom Hardy’s Venom is a joke. I dislike him because he lacks being scary, terrifying or serious which is a very important part of his character, and overall he is too goofy which is very annoying. Ugh!
People can say what they want about Spider-Man 3, it’s my favorite installment in terms of storyline and action.
This version of venom was so amazing
I agree
This one and Tom Hardy😭
6:55 and we are VERY happy indeed for giving us Venom, Bully Maguire, Sandman, etc
I get that Venom was a studio inclusion because of Avi Arad and with Sam already doing Sandman mostly, it was hard to put him in the original story Sam had planned. So with rewrites and reworks, Venom was included. But that of course came with problems of its own with the reception of the movie, Topher and just Venom all together.
Spider-Man 3 has a weird place in my heart. Back then I loved it because I was a lil kid enjoying my favorite hero on the big screen, but as the years progressed I became so much more critical of it. Now though, I’ve grown to appreciate it and what it brought.
This Venom actually scared me more than any adaptation we’ve gotten so far. I remember having nightmares for like two nights after watching this movie because of the design and sounds of Venom which were done fantastically to make him really Alien. It’s a shame we’ll never see the REAL Venom Sam Raimi wanted for this movie that included a Venom LITERALLY tearing at Eddie Brock, ripping his skin and flesh off as he became more parasitic and alien as well as the original ending with there being a venom skull after he and Eddie died
This film has a lot of potential, but the big problem is that everything was "optimized", and so they ended up cutting out interesting things. When Sony re-released the Spider-Man films, I thought they would add scenes that were cut at the time, but no, they missed an opportunity to improve the film
Some people hate Spider-Man 3 but they don't know Avi Arad is to blame hate he should have left Sam's script alone and let Sam do his original plans with Sandman and Harry Osborne Side Story finally being completed with his death because of the Venom in it caused Harry to be sidelined
"The person I really want to please is me, because I read these comic books." Oh Topher 😭💔💔
Tbh all this time, he doesn't talk about it much, and has said that he probably won't come back in the past, and I've always kinda felt like it was because of this. Like, he LOVED this character and it was a passion, and it was chewed up and spit out, and I can't imagine how devastating that would be.
I love how much of a clash that is with Andrew. When Andrew was cast to play spider-man he said "you realize the suit isn't yours, you're just wearing it. The character still belongs to the fans".
That wasn't Topher, that was Eric Foreman
He looked at the script and agreed to play a short one-off Venom though.
@@basedsalvy Eric Foreman?
@@ElyonGibbor from that 70's show
Venom should be good if you guys add the animatronic design and the alternate death of eddie brock
The anamatronic is in the movie for a couple of scenes.
That death should have been in the film, but I understand why they didn't put it in.
@@vitormachado4877 I'm glad they didn't simply because more Venom.
I won't forgot to fix or rewrite his lines and the personality to make more accurate, like this
⬇️⬇️
“And I think the fans will be happy”
Oh boy
better than tom hardy imo
oh boy yeah
@@viewaskew7741 u tripping brotha😂
He only needed to be hulk sized and then he truly would have been perfect.
Love Topher as venom he nailed it. But some people think venom should have been bigger but I think it perfect venom
5:06 if he returns he needs to look like that where cgi is not required that much.
I like this version of Venom, I prefer him being a villain than an anti-hero.
07 was sure a good year for action movies.
This Venom deserve to be a main Villian like the Green Goblin or Doc Ock was. I mean this Venom would be a real menace to Peter and all People of NYC. Peter's spidersenses didn't work against Venom.
What pissed me off back in the day is that Venom only appear at the end of the and then he died...
i always felt like the sam raimi spider man movies really felt like a comic coming to life! it was so amazing watching them in theaters the hype was real!!
I think the fans will be happy. Most would disagree on the venom in Spiderman 3. I didn't mind us much.
I found out Sam doesn't know Venom and he never wanted in his movie but he said something like he tried to make it work it didn't go well but I found out 2:41 Avi Arad interfered Sam vision put Venom in because if he wanted fans to like Spider-Man 3 even more put in our favorite character Venom and sell toys but Sam doesn't know Venom he was unhappy how he made Spider-Man 3 and he decided not to make Spider-Man 4 2011 If Sam just had creative control with Spider-Man 3 like he did with the first and second it would have been awesome then Sam would have made Spider-Man 4 2011 In Spider-Man 3 Sam originally wanted Sandman and Harry Osborne is the new Goblin as a villain
@@robertrodriguez1287you’re right. Spider man 3 was originally supposed to be sandman and harry osborne as the villains. But they forced Sam to add venom when the film was already done
I think topher grace should be from Spiderman 1 to build his personality as Eddie Brock, like animated series and then if was supposed to be in that movie he'll have his traumatic experience character
It’s funny when they say Spider-Man 3 and venom was the worst. Hell no this movie was the best all 3 of them were awesome. If your a true fan you know 👍
Yeah
I really don't understand why people hated it. It was a really good movie
@@ProfessionalMnce I know lol I loved it if your a true fan you love it all❤️🙏
Spider-Man 2 is better. The third one isn't bad, it's a film with potential, but it was very messy, that's why many don't like it.
@@vitormachado4877 yeah I agree ☝️ but at least we got a trilogy. Still great movies.
This is still one of the most underrated scenes of all time
At least he's a threat not a clown.
No recent Marvel film has come close to this level of cgi
I think Topher was an underrated Venom. RIP is gums.
We need the theatrical cut and deleted scenes released
I cant help but think of ' The Mask ' (1994). Venom is essentially playing the same role as the mask. We also see in that film what happens when power gets in the wrong hands. Peter Parker = Stanley Ipkiss & Eddie Brock = Dorian Tyrell.
the best live action version of venom.
This venom had a lot of potential then hardy's
Spiderman 3 was the best spider man movie i ever watch
CGI done on CRT monitors = Legendary Work
Since I was little he's my favorite Venom I like his design his build as athletic but more muscular than Spiderman I remember when I was little, my brother and I called him the evil Spider-Man.
I really love this venom design. It got 3 things missing that could make him perfect, a few inches of height, big muscles and a deeper voice like the one used on marvel’s Spider-Man 2
The CGI with practical effects are what make this version of venom outstanding
I really loved the face of venom 2007 and the attitude the aggression… the only thing that made me disappointed is the screen time and that he is like the same size as Peter. But still better than Tom Hardy’s comedian clown venom. This one was just a monster 👹
Originally Venom wasn't 8 foot monster like modern versions. Originally he was just size of Eddie Brock. Sure Eddie Brock was bigger and more buff than Peter but he wasn't 8 foot giant like Venom is these days.
Unpopular opinion: This Venom was truly creepy
I think is popular 🔥 love this venom❤
Yeah especially with those inhuman shrieks and growls that venom makes when he’s just a symbiote and not with a host.
@@xresonance9072 yeah
Topher Grace feels the same way about Sam Raimi as Eddie Brock feels about Jameson😆
See their computers back then, and what they created out it was masterpiece. 😮
This movie is a masterpiece, curse all the haters for taking spiderman 4 away. Even with raimi not wanting to do venom, you could see he was still putting his all into the character. As well as Topher grace being super excited for the role, he must've been heartbroken to see all the lashback from fans in 2007. He's not the comic accurate build, but he's the perfect yin-yang to parker in the raimi movies.
Its been 17 years since spider man 3 came out
Time really flies…
As much of a letdown this venom was, this was admittedly pretty cool
4:38 MJ flirting with Eddie Brock.
I LOVE SPIDER-MAN 3 and That venom Design ❤️🔥
Tobey Meguir Best Spider Man’s Actor Hands Down!
Truly the most underrated and most unappreciated villain in Marvel cinematic history. There's no way you can convince that Tom Hardy's adaptation was better in capturing the essence of Venom. You can't have a Venom w/o any tides to Peter Parker. Sony dropped the ball again and Hardy is a heck of a talent, just was just doomed from the start unfortunately due to terrible storytelling. Topher's Venom was robbed due to lack of screen time, just like Leto's Joker. This Venom was an absolute masterclass and would thrive nowadays if it was brought back somehow.
Damn! Real Muscle!!!
I prefer the symbiote animations in Spider-Man 3 to the venom movies. The ones in the venom movies aren’t bad but they look too much like black water and here it actually looks like living sludge.
Bro fr, the trilogy looks so fake
anybody else thinks the way the symbiote looks and moves here is heaps better than in the venom movies?
For it being the first on screen venom you couldn’t do it better this was a building block for the venom we have now Sam raimi and his staff really did there homework
creating Bully Maguire😂👍
Topher was great bc he and Toby share similar traits. Both kinda of nerdy, goofy, but topher brought some swagger and cockiness to his character while also believing that this Eddie also got bullied and picked on in highschool.
Ahh yes 12 year old me watching this in theater and had the shit scared out of me with this venom. The squeals and screams of venom and that jump scare where venom drops down above Peter and picks him up by his head terrified me 😂 just wish his voice was a little bit deeper and maybe a little more muscular and it would have been perfect. And more screen time. Venom is in my top 3 Spider-Man villain list. Along side goblin and doc ock
Suddenly, he doesn’t seem so bad after they turn Tom Hardy’s version into a joke. You hear that folks? Eric Foreman is actually the more serious and terrifying Venom.
This is amazing, love it. 😊
I love director Sam raimi.who make spider man and action
As a kid I liked it, but I also liked SW Attack of the Clones too. It wasnt until I grew up and noticed how *flawed* it all was. Sometimes nostalgia can really blind you from that.
This Eddie looked like Eminem 😅
I don't know what you guys think in the comments all those negativity sh**T. But this movie & the characters ate.
I literally just watched the whole trilogy last night and then this comes on my feed. World works in mysterious ways😂 but definitely my favorite venom interaction 🔥🔥
The fact that they did this on those tiny monitors is crazy! its amazing 👏
So much work involved and attention to the Venom design details, I love it. That being said, there are a few details missing with this Venom. Obviously the size difference compared to Spider-Man, the menacing deep voice, and the way he talks(we instead of I). The size difference I could look past that for this version, but as for the other two I don’t know why they chose to ignore them.
0:30 Oh Damn!! 😮
and I think the fans will b e happy 🤣, man is that lady eating her words.
spiderman 3 actually is my fav spiderman movie
If Venom was a little Beefier, and had that long tongue, i would’ve liked Venom's design in this movie more
6:20 sounds like a possessed cat
Cool Spider man movie 💀
This was a great venom design the symbiote tendrils were moving on his face as he talks
I really enjoyed every bit of computer work how you made venom into a a great villain. I did not know he wore wires down at Eddie Brock.
Guys Spider-Man 3 was meant Sandman and Harry Osborne is the new Goblin as a villain but 2:41Stupid Avi Arad ruined it he interfered Sam vision put Venom in because if he wanted fans to like Spider-Man 3 even more put in our favorite character Venom and sell toys but Sam doesn't know Venom he said something like he tried to make it work it didn't go well Sam was unhappy how he made Spider-Man 3 with Venom to the story and Sam decided not to make Spider-Man 4 2011 If Sam just had creative control with Spider-Man 3 like he did with the first and second it would have been awesome then Sam would have made Spider-Man 4 2011
That last part is untrue. Sam DID want to make Spider-Man 4 but Sony wouldn't let him do it his own way so it never made it past storyboards
Avi Arad saved spider-man 3. Don’t raise your tongue at us boy
@@robertrodriguez1287
Avi Arad saved Spider-Man 3, he understands venom more than Song itself does that’s why he put him in the 3rd spider-man film because he’s been reading comic books since before you were born
The movie was always going to have three villains. Vulture was the original one but Sam didn't like how he felt so disconnected, they threw the idea of Venom in and after the draft was written he liked it and was on board. Stop spreading false information.
Vulture was supposed to be third antagonist in the movie. If I'm not mistaken, the whole "Peter let Spider-Man popularity get in his head" was always part of the plot, same with making Flint the man responsible for Ben's death. Avi Arad pushed for Venom because of his popularity and Raimi didn't want Venom because at the time, and yes, I know he "clarified" it, but he was adamant about how he hated the character. Anyway, aside from being forced to include Venom, any misstep the movie had was on Raimi as he did the script. I like the movie, by the way, but there are things that could've been better. As for Spider-Man 4, Sony wanted for May 2011, but the scripts weren't good enough, so Raimi walked away from the project because he knew he couldn't make the movie on time and Sony went with plan B that ended up being The Amazing Spider-Man
They were stretching Tobey's face 💀
Not to hate on Hardy’s venom, it was fun. But this venom was in my opinion, more realistic. It could have some improvements for sure but I think it looked the best. That being said a perfect mix of both would be awesome. Topher Grace as Eddie I think is way better (also actually like the comics) the deep voice in Hardy’s venom, the size of Hardy’s venom, but everything else from this venom and I think it would be perfect
Main thing I took from this scene as a kid when I first seen it was Peter had to swing butt naked home after that lol
Imagine being an actor it would be so awkward 💀
I am going have to Watch this Movie again
how much I love Tom Hardy but prefer Topher’s version of Venom
Amo esta version de venom, sin duda es mejor este venom que el actual
I feel like this should’ve been one of the first times they made a 2 part movie.
This movies critics were so weird. I mean the movie wasn’t the best, but it was still awesome.
The way the movie should have ended was Venom screaming and doing into the camera. Then set that up for Spiderman 4. The studio screwed that movie up big time. But that is what you get when you have people who only know business, only care about business, and profit margins.
4:19 so at one point he had no webbing on the suit?! How many suit revisions were there?!!
The only reason this design works is because this Eddie Brock is meant to act as a foil to Peter, all around an excellent interpretation of the character when you examine the context of the film he appears in.
the only problem of this venom is .. screen time.
i can't imagine a venom with like 10 minutes of a screen time.
This venom actually looks realistic
wish they used vulture and mysterio in this movie instead of venom
Best Venom. much better than Hardy's clown
yeah bozo! hardy's venom is comic accurate because he has personality, because venom is not just cold hearted monster and he never teams up to kill spider-man
@@b_04_akshatchoudhary67 ну да ну да. Харди это клоун жижа с турыми шутками и ужасным сюжетом
"I think the fans will be happy" oh boy. 😬
Grace would have been a better Spider-Man
Like cartoon spider-man animated series
Raimi's Venom ; Skinny Guy
MCU's Venom ; Muscle Guy
Granted this Venom is too skinny compared to the comic book, but the CGI and make-up still hole up very nicely to this day.
This venom is very disappointed
The third one was not good enough but a world wide to everyone who loved the first two films And the comics
Find a video that saids
The untold story of Sam Raimi canceled Spider-Man 4 Cutshort (and watch it)
There was a line that said Sam wanted Sandman and Harry no Venom in the movie 2:41 Avi Arad forced Sam put Venom in but Sam doesn't know Venom
At least with live in a world where there’s a Spider-Man movie where Venom is a practical suit