Actually, there are probably billions of earth-sized planets in the habitable zone to be discovered in our own galaxy. There are at least tens of billions of galaxies.
Well, they're astronomers, not videomakers. The purpose of videos like this is simply to give the raw materials to medias and said videomakers so they can make their own decent videos.
Anyone who thinks this is fake is stupid or hardcore religous. This is an animation, but the discovery is real. Yes, you may think that the whole thing is fake, but the Kepler telescope is a deep space telescope that is solar powered. It has been traveling for quite a while now. It can also take pictures from so far away you would be looking at a star planet etc about 10 million years ago, heck, even billions of years ago. Yes, these planets spotted may be gone at this exact moment, but dosn't mean new ones can't be made. And maybe even life will evolve when he can finally visit, so stop the hate and gove NASA and SETTI some respect!
This video was so boring and and lacking some emotional substance, I feel like it was made by Sheldon, which is one of the reasons why this video is so very awesome. Great job, Kepler team! Keep it up
Does it concern anyone that while we're looking for Earth-like planets, we might "accidentally" find activity on one of them? If that happens, then what do we do?
For a planet to have a sufficient magnetosphere it would have to have convection currents in it's mantle to generate a dynamo effect and create a magnetic field. For this, first of all for this to happen the planet has to be big enough to generate enough heat, and needs to have oceans to allow tectonic plates to subduct and keep convection going. Mars lost it's magnetic field likely because it is so small so that all the radioactive elements in it's core decayed and there wasn't enough compression in the mantle from it's mass meaning it cooled down and convection stopped. For Venus, what happened was likely that it experienced a runaway greenhouse effect due to it being close to it's star, the run away greenhouse effect boiled off all the water into water vapor (which is a very effective greenhouse gas), solar wind then blasted all the water in the atmosphere breaking it apart into hydrogen and oxygen, the hydrogen was blown away by the solar wind, while the oxygen sunk down and underwent a chemical reaction with the rocks under a high pressure. Since the oceans press down on certain plates allowing them to subduct under other plates, without oceans there would be no subduction and the tectonic movement would lock up and stop. Without tectonic movement there would be very little heat release from the interior of the planet, so the heat would be distributed evenly throughout the mantle stopping convection and the magnetic field would cease to exist.
All of you saying we'll never have the technology to find life, or to know how old the Earth is or whatever... think about it....if you brought an iPhone to people just 150 years ago (a very small amount of time), it would amaze them and be as unbelievable as time travel or any comparable technology would be for us. They obviously didn't think iPhones would ever be possible. OPEN YOUR MINDS PEOPLE
The planet is two times closer to its sun but the sun itself is twice smaller than our sun , so it's perfect match to our system , now the only thing we need to know before living there is wither there is water or not !
what we see now is an after image of the planet 492 years ago, and it was destroyed for almost 30 years due to natural disaster. the last survivor is living somewhere in Kansas.
Nasa dudes... It's most likely that all of you are some sort of super geniuses... Watch some video editing tutorials before you post again a video... Great work on Kepler 186 though! Thumbs up!
Funny how this is the "first" when you've reported several "firsts" before this. And where are the actual photos and videos of the findings and not just graphics?
They don't have photos. That's not how they calculate the size, mass and distance from it's parent star. Also, of course they've reported several firsts. The first exoplanet they discovered. The first exoplanet inside a habitable zone, the size of the Earth etc. This is the first exoplanet who's size is similar to Earth AND is within it's habitable zone.
The previous ones were unconfirmed, or too large to be really called "earth size". And we can't take pictures of such small and distant objects with our current telescopes. We have to detect them through several indirect methods. (lookup "astronomical transit" (what Kepler uses) and "radial velocity method" to get an example of such techniques).
I wanna know if life exists on 186f...Do we have to land there to find out or is there a minute chance future telescope modifications would allow us to get radar images such as those on googleearth? lol...all joking aside
How the hell are they getting zoomed in photos of the planet's geography!? It's just mind blowing to me that these telescopes are really that powerful.
I think those shots are a computer animation of what they think it looks like. The actual shots are mostly scrambled pixels that only professionals would be able to interpret.
We have 2 chances of surviving as a species on the long term: 1 moving onto another planet and use up its resources the way we are used to, 2 managing a way of keeping damage and resource consumption at a ratio that allows time for earth to regenerate. In my opinion number 2, even though is referred as utopia, is much more realistic and doable. Just my 2 cents, peace V
If the planet has double our gravity then they can't have any high rise buildings they'd be so over engineered it wouldn't be worth it. If the planet has no iron ores then it's basically useless, you can't building anything technological without iron. Hopefully it has an abundance or rare metals and iron, and a lot of coal!
And traveling at the speed of the Voyager Spacecraft (26,000 mph)-the fastest man made object in existence-it would take a 1.1 million years to get there.
Chad B Doesn't matter how fast our spacecraft can go, still takes 500 years only for the light to get here. I only got hopes for some kind of a loophole or something :(
***** Just travel faster than the speed of time. That way after you reach the planet you can just go back in time to the original date you started from and your travel will effectively instant.
Reaching this planet is simply impossible, but it's good discovery for scientists to try to find other earth-like planets but this time try finding ones closer than 400 light years away :-D
Why are they looking for another earth size planet??I mean if they are seeking another planet humans can survive on and go to if need be and they all say earth is becoming over populated would it not make more sense to look for a livable planet larger than earth?
Just speculations and computer models but not hardcore evidence show us the pictures we want to see the REAL videos from Kepler raw. Is this telescope really capable to see that far away? ...yes! Indeed!! Look at this animation isn't it cute?
They're not pictures, it would be almost impossible to take photos of a planet that far away. Instead the telescope detects the light that is blocked from the star as a small planet passes in front of the star. From this they can tell from the amount of light blocked out and when it is blocked out, they can tell the size of the planet and how long it takes to orbit it's star. Yes the telescope can see that far, but it can only see the stars, not the actual planets. Future telescopes might be able to analyze small amounts of light that might get reflected from a planets atmosphere to see what type of gasses might be in it's atmosphere if it has one, like oxygen or co2 or whatnot, but it can't take direct photos of the planet. Only a few photos have been directly taken of planets outside our solar system and it was only from nearby stars and of very large planets like Jupiter in size.
These are some of the only direct photos taken of extrasolar planets.. www.google.com/search?q=exoplanet+direct+photo&biw=1600&bih=743&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ei=piStVNyQOYiRyATO34CACg&ved=0CAYQ_AUoAQ
don't mean to burst any bubbles here but for life to exist anywhere else you have to have an explanation of how life got here on earth in the 1st place. You cant say life is here therefore life is elsewhere, that is sillyness. There is no explanation within origins of life science.
Really not sure what you are trying to say... Since before the big bang, everything were just a gaint mass object, after the big bang, new materials started to exist as the atoms, particles and other aspects affected each other. After a loooong time, bacteria and small organisms started to exist from basically nowhere. Why would this not be a gaint possibility on all of the other thousands of earth like candidate planets out there in space?
Pierre Bengtsson because bacteria is itself too complex to form by natural processes. It is like saying, " robots can exist on Earth why not other Earth like planets. " Uhhhhh because chemical processes do not give rise to robots, humans do. Likewise chemical processes do not give rise to humans, God did. You are just assuming what you have not proven. Look into origin of life sciences, the more we learn the more we know life did not spontaneously create itself. Furthermore there is a law, it is call the law of biogenesis. Life only comes from life, life has never once been observed to come from non life. It would be on you to show, not speculate, but to show otherwise. : ) Until you can show life can come from non life, there is no reason to believe life can be on other planets.
Oh... You believe in a world created by a God. I'm just Gonna... Eh... Walk slowly away from here... *leaves a note * - sincere reader, please ask your frictional creator about quantum physics, without it nothing can exist, but we know almost nothing about it, and because of that we have no proof that life can't just become life. Without other already existing life support. The only "God" I'd accept as a creator, is "aliens" or maybe ourselves, but in a future were we have mastered the laws of the universe. But since nothing of that can be proven in our life time, please don't waste your time believing in some tales of a drunk bearded man from ancient humankind, that barely even knew about land that existed across the sea.... I have an idea! Devote your mind to something useful, maybe you will be the one explaining quantum physics... ;)
Pierre Bengtsson Quantum mechanics proves the existence of God, since it takes conscious awareness to break down the probability wave into actuality. That means, Someone had to observe the big bang for it to be actualized. I would not go this route, quantum mechanics disproves materialism scientifically. You can't accept ourselves as the creators because we would 1st have to exist to create ourselves which is a contradiction. You can appeal to aliens but that only begs the question, how did aliens get here ?
Pierre Bengtsson "organisms started to exist from basically nowhere". This is the dumbest claim I've ever heard in my life. No organism can become exist from nowhere, it's nonsense and have no explanation in science. Organisms can only be converted from another organism. And no one knows how the life did start. Until you find a logical proof (which you will never be able to do), you have to accept that a "Creator" created the first germ. Because it still is the only logical and true claim.
The real Kepler-186f might look completely different from these pics as they're fictional and made by a computer, scientists would never be able to zoom up to 400 light years xD
It's just a matter of time and I hope in my lifetime. Some people will hate me for saying but the human race is probably just an iteration of what's better.
+OVS Gaming Everything mentioned in the Koran Say, Whether ye hide that which is in your breasts or reveal it, Allah knoweth it. He knoweth that which is in the heavens and that which is in the earth, and Allah is Able to do all things sourat Al-imran 29 With Him are the keys of the unseen, the treasures that none knoweth but He. He knoweth whatever there is on the earth and in the sea. Not a leaf doth fall but with His knowledge: there is not a grain in the darkness (or depths) of the earth, nor anything fresh or dry (green or withered), but is (inscribed) in a record clear (to those who can read).sourat Al-An'aam 59
ringalibaba dziękuję, nigdy nie zrozumieć życie za wszystkie dni, aż do śmierci, jesteś z dala od tego wszystkiego, dzień umrzesz powiedzieć, że mam rację
No, magnetic field an presence of a moon are unrelated. The magnetic field is caused by phenomenons in the planet's metallic core, a moon has nothing to do with it.
Yes but the movement of the metallic core i think has to do with the moon orbit. i searched allot on the internet no one seems to have this idea. maybe i'm just stupid but why the earth magnetic filed has the same age as the moon does.
HENNI Mohamed I have no idea if there you can measure age on fields... On the other hand there is a theory that our moon was created when a Mars like object colided with Earth throwing matter to the space and eventually creating the moon. If that theory is true to some extend then both planets share the same material and logically would have the same age. I am a sound engineer not an astrophysicist so don't take my word too serious...
HENNI Mohamed We don't know how old the Earth's magnetic field is! We only know it was already here 3.45 billion years ago, and it is unlikely we'll ever be able to look further back. Also, Venus and Mercury both have a magnetic field. Yet, they have no moon.
***** Oh wow, great comeback. And soooooo original. It must have taken you days to formulate that one. For feck sake i'm debating some Minecraft kiddie. Run home little one the internet is a scary place for the unprepared and you are the most unprepared I've come across in weeks.
Ummmm, no, thats not true. Hahahahaha. You could be like, Oh theres Mars, its another planet. Why you would go outside the solar system for evidence if you were trying to make that point is sort of funny.
Unless we find some way to communicate and travel over great distances, avoiding the light speed limit, then we can make something of it. But, just because we can`t find workable way to FTL speeds at the moment, doesn`t mean there is no. Gathering knowledge of habitable planet is useful intel, but that is what will remain, an information nothing less. Impossible to communicate, impossible to reach within lifetime of a single generation... The only theorethical way are Einstein-Rosen bridges, aka Wormholes, through we can at first send and capture signals...
I'm sorry, this is extremely fascinating and interesting etc... But the editing here is terrible!! Sound glitches, video without any background sound/noise and sometimes the video starts before the sound. Call me picky or something, if you wish. But the editing is still terrible, no matter what you call me.
there are probably billions of earth size planet in habitable zone to be discovered in the universe. it was only matter of time before we find one.
Actually, there are probably billions of earth-sized planets in the habitable zone to be discovered in our own galaxy. There are at least tens of billions of galaxies.
They can locate possibly habitable planets 500 lightyears away, but they can't edit a decent video.
Well, they're astronomers, not videomakers. The purpose of videos like this is simply to give the raw materials to medias and said videomakers so they can make their own decent videos.
of course. just a little internet trolling. don't mind me ;-)
This is a B-roll for news media to use to compile their reports.
Leave the overblown sensationalism to the media, not the scientists.
what is the distance of Kepler to its sun?
Anyone who thinks this is fake is stupid or hardcore religous. This is an animation, but the discovery is real. Yes, you may think that the whole thing is fake, but the Kepler telescope is a deep space telescope that is solar powered. It has been traveling for quite a while now. It can also take pictures from so far away you would be looking at a star planet etc about 10 million years ago, heck, even billions of years ago. Yes, these planets spotted may be gone at this exact moment, but dosn't mean new ones can't be made. And maybe even life will evolve when he can finally visit, so stop the hate and gove NASA and SETTI some respect!
my first thought goes to Carl Sagan and all the people like him. Thank you guys!
This video was so boring and and lacking some emotional substance, I feel like it was made by Sheldon, which is one of the reasons why this video is so very awesome. Great job, Kepler team! Keep it up
Does it concern anyone that while we're looking for Earth-like planets, we might "accidentally" find activity on one of them? If that happens, then what do we do?
What about having the same magnetosphere that Earth does? It would have to be protected in order to be habitable, right?
For a planet to have a sufficient magnetosphere it would have to have convection currents in it's mantle to generate a dynamo effect and create a magnetic field. For this, first of all for this to happen the planet has to be big enough to generate enough heat, and needs to have oceans to allow tectonic plates to subduct and keep convection going. Mars lost it's magnetic field likely because it is so small so that all the radioactive elements in it's core decayed and there wasn't enough compression in the mantle from it's mass meaning it cooled down and convection stopped. For Venus, what happened was likely that it experienced a runaway greenhouse effect due to it being close to it's star, the run away greenhouse effect boiled off all the water into water vapor (which is a very effective greenhouse gas), solar wind then blasted all the water in the atmosphere breaking it apart into hydrogen and oxygen, the hydrogen was blown away by the solar wind, while the oxygen sunk down and underwent a chemical reaction with the rocks under a high pressure. Since the oceans press down on certain plates allowing them to subduct under other plates, without oceans there would be no subduction and the tectonic movement would lock up and stop. Without tectonic movement there would be very little heat release from the interior of the planet, so the heat would be distributed evenly throughout the mantle stopping convection and the magnetic field would cease to exist.
I wonder if i'll get phone reception n Kepler...
All of you saying we'll never have the technology to find life, or to know how old the Earth is or whatever... think about it....if you brought an iPhone to people just 150 years ago (a very small amount of time), it would amaze them and be as unbelievable as time travel or any comparable technology would be for us. They obviously didn't think iPhones would ever be possible. OPEN YOUR MINDS PEOPLE
Does it have a Satellite (aka moon)?
Problem is, how do we get there?
The planet is two times closer to its sun but the sun itself is twice smaller than our sun , so it's perfect match to our system , now the only thing we need to know before living there is wither there is water or not !
what we see now is an after image of the planet 492 years ago, and it was destroyed for almost 30 years due to natural disaster. the last survivor is living somewhere in Kansas.
Amazing news! :-)
Been looking at this pin for three years. The planet is nice.
Confirming this is relatively easy compared to KOI-3284.01, KOI-5927.01 and KOI-5123.01.
Nasa dudes... It's most likely that all of you are some sort of super geniuses... Watch some video editing tutorials before you post again a video... Great work on Kepler 186 though! Thumbs up!
How long it takes to ride a bike on the new planet? Thank you.
We are not alone!!!!!!!!!!!
We knew that -.-
Funny how this is the "first" when you've reported several "firsts" before this. And where are the actual photos and videos of the findings and not just graphics?
They don't have photos. That's not how they calculate the size, mass and distance from it's parent star. Also, of course they've reported several firsts. The first exoplanet they discovered. The first exoplanet inside a habitable zone, the size of the Earth etc. This is the first exoplanet who's size is similar to Earth AND is within it's habitable zone.
The previous ones were unconfirmed, or too large to be really called "earth size". And we can't take pictures of such small and distant objects with our current telescopes. We have to detect them through several indirect methods. (lookup "astronomical transit" (what Kepler uses) and "radial velocity method" to get an example of such techniques).
I wanna know if life exists on 186f...Do we have to land there to find out or is there a minute chance future telescope modifications would allow us to get radar images such as those on googleearth? lol...all joking aside
Nvidia Kepler video card? I know it can do some serious data processing for science (Seti@home, Folding@home, Einstein@home, etc)
And when the plane Malaysia airlines will be found here on Earth??
How the hell are they getting zoomed in photos of the planet's geography!? It's just mind blowing to me that these telescopes are really that powerful.
I think those shots are a computer animation of what they think it looks like. The actual shots are mostly scrambled pixels that only professionals would be able to interpret.
ryuuproductions how and why?? i mean... wtf?
It's real they sent probs there to take pics
Xboxgamerdj
Kepler-186f is 500 light-years away from earth... They definitely did not send a probe there ;-)
***** , u joking, right?
We have 2 chances of surviving as a species on the long term: 1 moving onto another planet and use up its resources the way we are used to, 2 managing a way of keeping damage and resource consumption at a ratio that allows time for earth to regenerate. In my opinion number 2, even though is referred as utopia, is much more realistic and doable. Just my 2 cents, peace V
Imagine if there are intelligent lifeforms on Kepler! wow...but perhaps we'll never know...
no offense, but Kepler is the name of the telescope which were used to discover this exoplanet, it's name is Kepler-186f :)
92tpeter its easier to use a nickname. So Planet Kepler is just as acceptable.
we will later in the future...If dumb pricks don't ruin it
If the planet has double our gravity then they can't have any high rise buildings they'd be so over engineered it wouldn't be worth it.
If the planet has no iron ores then it's basically useless, you can't building anything technological without iron. Hopefully it has an abundance or rare metals and iron, and a lot of coal!
does it have oil? cuz america gonna invade it
Michael M Yep it's gonna take them a while to get there tho
And traveling at the speed of the Voyager Spacecraft (26,000 mph)-the fastest man made object in existence-it would take a 1.1 million years to get there.
actually it's 38,000 mph voyager 1
or we can create a faster spacecraft.
Chad B Doesn't matter how fast our spacecraft can go, still takes 500 years only for the light to get here. I only got hopes for some kind of a loophole or something :(
*****
Just travel faster than the speed of time. That way after you reach the planet you can just go back in time to the original date you started from and your travel will effectively instant.
One small step for man, one giant... oh wait.. :-)
Awesome news! :D
Reaching this planet is simply impossible, but it's good discovery for scientists to try to find other earth-like planets but this time try finding ones closer than 400 light years away :-D
Not impossible, but it still won't happen for hundreds of years.
cold hard truth you need a lot of money if you ever want to live there heck we dont even have the space craft to get us there lol
when we can go away ? can't wait to see how looks their rijana
and this planet is far, far away.
Why are they looking for another earth size planet??I mean if they are seeking another planet humans can survive on and go to if need be and they all say earth is becoming over populated would it not make more sense to look for a livable planet larger than earth?
Just speculations and computer models but not hardcore evidence show us the pictures we want to see the REAL videos from Kepler raw.
Is this telescope really capable to see that far away?
...yes! Indeed!! Look at this animation isn't it cute?
They're not pictures, it would be almost impossible to take photos of a planet that far away. Instead the telescope detects the light that is blocked from the star as a small planet passes in front of the star. From this they can tell from the amount of light blocked out and when it is blocked out, they can tell the size of the planet and how long it takes to orbit it's star. Yes the telescope can see that far, but it can only see the stars, not the actual planets. Future telescopes might be able to analyze small amounts of light that might get reflected from a planets atmosphere to see what type of gasses might be in it's atmosphere if it has one, like oxygen or co2 or whatnot, but it can't take direct photos of the planet. Only a few photos have been directly taken of planets outside our solar system and it was only from nearby stars and of very large planets like Jupiter in size.
These are some of the only direct photos taken of extrasolar planets.. www.google.com/search?q=exoplanet+direct+photo&biw=1600&bih=743&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ei=piStVNyQOYiRyATO34CACg&ved=0CAYQ_AUoAQ
don't mean to burst any bubbles here but for life to exist anywhere else you have to have an explanation of how life got here on earth in the 1st place. You cant say life is here therefore life is elsewhere, that is sillyness. There is no explanation within origins of life science.
Really not sure what you are trying to say... Since before the big bang, everything were just a gaint mass object, after the big bang, new materials started to exist as the atoms, particles and other aspects affected each other. After a loooong time, bacteria and small organisms started to exist from basically nowhere. Why would this not be a gaint possibility on all of the other thousands of earth like candidate planets out there in space?
Pierre Bengtsson because bacteria is itself too complex to form by natural processes. It is like saying, " robots can exist on Earth why not other Earth like planets. " Uhhhhh because chemical processes do not give rise to robots, humans do. Likewise chemical processes do not give rise to humans, God did.
You are just assuming what you have not proven. Look into origin of life sciences, the more we learn the more we know life did not spontaneously create itself.
Furthermore there is a law, it is call the law of biogenesis. Life only comes from life, life has never once been observed to come from non life. It would be on you to show, not speculate, but to show otherwise. : )
Until you can show life can come from non life, there is no reason to believe life can be on other planets.
Oh... You believe in a world created by a God. I'm just Gonna... Eh... Walk slowly away from here... *leaves a note * - sincere reader, please ask your frictional creator about quantum physics, without it nothing can exist, but we know almost nothing about it, and because of that we have no proof that life can't just become life. Without other already existing life support. The only "God" I'd accept as a creator, is "aliens" or maybe ourselves, but in a future were we have mastered the laws of the universe. But since nothing of that can be proven in our life time, please don't waste your time believing in some tales of a drunk bearded man from ancient humankind, that barely even knew about land that existed across the sea.... I have an idea! Devote your mind to something useful, maybe you will be the one explaining quantum physics... ;)
Pierre Bengtsson Quantum mechanics proves the existence of God, since it takes conscious awareness to break down the probability wave into actuality. That means, Someone had to observe the big bang for it to be actualized. I would not go this route, quantum mechanics disproves materialism scientifically.
You can't accept ourselves as the creators because we would 1st have to exist to create ourselves which is a contradiction. You can appeal to aliens but that only begs the question, how did aliens get here ?
Pierre Bengtsson "organisms started to exist from basically nowhere". This is the dumbest claim I've ever heard in my life. No organism can become exist from nowhere, it's nonsense and have no explanation in science. Organisms can only be converted from another organism. And no one knows how the life did start. Until you find a logical proof (which you will never be able to do), you have to accept that a "Creator" created the first germ. Because it still is the only logical and true claim.
i think we can live there..
Thats where all the dead souls are, in planet kepler lol
I dont know why but it reminds me of the planet from The Man of Steel movie
that planet looked like it's covered in ice
The real Kepler-186f might look completely different from these pics as they're fictional and made by a computer, scientists would never be able to zoom up to 400 light years xD
It's just a matter of time and I hope in my lifetime. Some people will hate me for saying but the human race is probably just an iteration of what's better.
i dont think so.
490 Anos-Luz é muito longe, mais a vontade de ir pra la é grande ahsuashauhshauhsausha
its 500 light years not 490
About 500, on a site said 490 years, but do not know if this right, sorry any error, I do not speak english very well hehehehehe
thats ok i understand. check www.nasa.gov to verify but i think it said 500 lightyears. either way its a long way :)
Another planet like ours?
Let us meet our next door neighbors.... (Please don't invade our planet)!
قُلْ إِنْ تُخْفُوا مَا فِي صُدُورِكُمْ أَوْ تُبْدُوهُ يَعْلَمْهُ اللَّهُ ۗ وَيَعْلَمُ مَا فِي السَّمَاوَاتِ وَمَا فِي الْأَرْضِ ۗ وَاللَّهُ عَلَىٰ كُلِّ شَيْءٍ قَدِيرٌ
وَعِنْدَهُ مَفَاتِحُ الْغَيْبِ لَا يَعْلَمُهَا إِلَّا هُوَ ۚ وَيَعْلَمُ مَا فِي الْبَرِّ وَالْبَحْرِ ۚ وَمَا تَسْقُطُ مِنْ وَرَقَةٍ إِلَّا يَعْلَمُهَا وَلَا حَبَّةٍ فِي ظُلُمَاتِ الْأَرْضِ وَلَا رَطْبٍ وَلَا يَابِسٍ إِلَّا فِي كِتَابٍ مُبِينٍ
صدق الله العظيم
English plz
+OVS Gaming Everything mentioned in the Koran
Say, Whether ye hide that which is in your breasts or
reveal it, Allah knoweth it. He knoweth that which is in the heavens and
that which is in the earth, and Allah is Able to do all things
sourat Al-imran 29
With Him are the keys of the unseen, the treasures that none knoweth
but He. He knoweth whatever there is on the earth and in the sea. Not a
leaf doth fall but with His knowledge: there is not a grain in the
darkness (or depths) of the earth, nor anything fresh or dry (green or
withered), but is (inscribed) in a record clear (to those who can read).sourat Al-An'aam 59
+Youssef Choukairi syn boga się odzywa, osioł
ringalibaba
dziękuję, nigdy nie zrozumieć życie za wszystkie dni, aż do śmierci, jesteś z dala od tego wszystkiego, dzień umrzesz powiedzieć, że mam rację
muito bom ! lets go find my brothers !
Does a planet need a moon to have a strong magnetic field that protects it from cosmic rays ?
No, magnetic field an presence of a moon are unrelated. The magnetic field is caused by phenomenons in the planet's metallic core, a moon has nothing to do with it.
Piranha's correct, there is no relation between a planets magnetic field and its moon.
Yes but the movement of the metallic core i think has to do with the moon orbit.
i searched allot on the internet no one seems to have this idea. maybe i'm just stupid but why the earth magnetic filed has the same age as the moon does.
HENNI Mohamed I have no idea if there you can measure age on fields... On the other hand there is a theory that our moon was created when a Mars like object colided with Earth throwing matter to the space and eventually creating the moon. If that theory is true to some extend then both planets share the same material and logically would have the same age. I am a sound engineer not an astrophysicist so don't take my word too serious...
HENNI Mohamed
We don't know how old the Earth's magnetic field is! We only know it was already here 3.45 billion years ago, and it is unlikely we'll ever be able to look further back.
Also, Venus and Mercury both have a magnetic field. Yet, they have no moon.
Oh goodie so man has found another planet to destroy.
***** Who you calling whiny boxhead?
***** Oh wow, great comeback. And soooooo original. It must have taken you days to formulate that one. For feck sake i'm debating some Minecraft kiddie. Run home little one the internet is a scary place for the unprepared and you are the most unprepared I've come across in weeks.
Thats the best you got?? Seriously???
***** I wouldn't even want to know you.
***** You sure you meant rooting "FOR"
well~~ ET use to live in there~
is there a possible way to send a robot there to collect a soil and water sample??
yep. it's called a Warp Drive that would take weeks or months to travel to other planets
Véi... Na bôa... Dá vontade de chorar...
450 million years to get there. sign me up.
oh gee 500 light years goody might as well be 1 million no one will ever thouch that rock within the next 57.83 million years
Take that Christianity
Not sure how this disproves Christianity, but ok.
Christianity believes that their is only one planet, Earth. supposedly created by "God"
Ummmm, no, thats not true. Hahahahaha.
You could be like, Oh theres Mars, its another planet. Why you would go outside the solar system for evidence if you were trying to make that point is sort of funny.
Jacob Wurzer one habitable planet
Christians don't believe that there is only one habitable planet either.....
Atmosphere?
Other life in the Universe...DUHHHHHH.,..
axax concurs ,, ..
Unless we find some way to communicate and travel over great distances, avoiding the light speed limit, then we can make something of it. But, just because we can`t find workable way to FTL speeds at the moment, doesn`t mean there is no. Gathering knowledge of habitable planet is useful intel, but that is what will remain, an information nothing less. Impossible to communicate, impossible to reach within lifetime of a single generation... The only theorethical way are Einstein-Rosen bridges, aka Wormholes, through we can at first send and capture signals...
it doesn't have a moon, must wobble no tides
Maybe, this planet doen't exist right now, we know that each thing we seen is died.
Andres Hesse R possibly .. still there are billion upon billions of stars out there........... so what does it matter..
ahaha, yeah, why not, maybe, we are already died. Who knows.?
carry on until we realise... hell is this planet
mars is in the habitable zone of our solar system, just saying..
Yeah all of that liquid water on mars would sustain lots of life... good on...
ocdoman except that mars was too small to retain its magnetic field, Kepler-186f is 10% larger than earth, so it "will" have a magnetic field.
I'm sorry, this is extremely fascinating and interesting etc...
But the editing here is terrible!! Sound glitches, video without any background sound/noise and sometimes the video starts before the sound. Call me picky or something, if you wish. But the editing is still terrible, no matter what you call me.
Fake
Fake