Physical existence is the relatively quantifiable difference between probabalistic certainty and the gradient of timespace, one interpretation of which is the gravitational field. Ie it's the integration, "sum of histories", of the rate of change of time-objectives between the limits of zero and +/- infinity. (Standard formulation of the superimposed probability distributions interpreted as Psi)
In trying to resolve the conflict between General Relativity and Quantum theory it is important to sort out the theories at the level of the physical description. General Relativity is a theory derived from first principles and has a clear relationship between the maths and the physical nature of spacetime.
Physicists need to get their heads out of their asses. Look to the arts, biology, and nature for direction. Then maybe you wouldn’t get so bogged down. I have been writing for decades about how there is a logos echo of meaning we can clearly see and once we work out the relationships, points to where we will find answers as much as the periodic table does for elements. To come up with a theory of everything, you have to consider everything. Pretty basic. That’s the only way you can get around our naturally/evolutionary limited world views.
Physical existence is the relatively quantifiable difference between probabalistic certainty and the gradient of timespace, one interpretation of which is the gravitational field. Ie it's the integration, "sum of histories", of the rate of change of time-objectives between the limits of zero and +/- infinity. (Standard formulation of the superimposed probability distributions interpreted as Psi)
In trying to resolve the conflict between General Relativity and Quantum theory it is important to sort out the theories at the level of the physical description. General Relativity is a theory derived from first principles and has a clear relationship between the maths and the physical nature of spacetime.
Physicists need to get their heads out of their asses. Look to the arts, biology, and nature for direction. Then maybe you wouldn’t get so bogged down. I have been writing for decades about how there is a logos echo of meaning we can clearly see and once we work out the relationships, points to where we will find answers as much as the periodic table does for elements. To come up with a theory of everything, you have to consider everything. Pretty basic. That’s the only way you can get around our naturally/evolutionary limited world views.