this is basically the standard story as told by any textbook on the subject. Not only that, but at the end of the talk he states his preference amongst the hypotheses as the MSSM which is precisely the most popular and conservative model that most physicists adopt on the subject (for many reasons including simplicity and plausibility, but also popular precisely because it is conservative and the opinions of one's peers still counts for something in the physics community). I'm glad you enjoyed it but it most certainly isn't the road less travelled. It is simply the story of why for most the MSSM (or CMSSM) is the currently preferred model.
Watching Nima pacing back and forwards in front of a sea of equation-stuffed blackboards while he agonizes over the limits of his knowledge is breathtaking to watch. Wonderful stuff.
This is a good lecture for all modern physicists to memorize. I'll explain why later. Seeing this lecture on supersymmetry leaves out 'imaginary ' values in quarks in protons. In the colliders these are invisible at the vanishing points. You can't see them directly . You need low energy methods to get their evidence such as protons in organic physics. Susy may be knowable then in organics only. Electrons are apparantly fractional when susy is on ie negatives in square roots. Like superconducting at low T.
Never. Scientists are some of the most dogmatic people. Plus if that’s their career, they only know how to write papers on that topic, so they continue. Approx 500 papers per year on Supersymmetry posted to arxiv since 1991 and not a shred of evidence lol.
If anyone believes gravity exists and spends there time trying to comprehend it, they're out of their freaking mind. This is voodoo science and you have to like voodoo to appreciate what this guy knows.
Tiadiad, we live in a contained environment. And as long as God keeps the motionless flat Earth pressurized, there's no more danger of floating off into space then there is of falling off the edge. But you're probably a theory believer and wouldn't know anything about reality.
Tiadiad, you're a theory/fiction believer, which allows you to not see the reality that is plainly and scientifically before you. God says the reason you've chosen this false reality, is willful ignorance. You're stupid on purppose and there's isn't anything anyone can do for you. You have to decided to think and see for yourself. If you're happy with your pseudoscience reality, then keep it.
Raymond, you've obviously never given this subject much thought. Which tells me you have no idea that your education was really an indoctrination, and you probably know very little that's true. And I'm not a doctor and don't know how to bring one of you zombie's back to reality. I can only suggest stop taking the blue pills and wake the hell up. I guess I could give you the benefit of the doubt and assume you still have some free brain cells that aren't full of theoretical nonsense. So lets see if your really alive. Do you know what equilibrium is? Now picture a can of aerosol paint. Inside the can is a pressurized atmosphere. Outside of the can would represent an unpressurized atmosphere in a ratio comparable to the theoretical vacuum of space. Now what keeps the aerosol paint from escaping into the surrounding atmosphere? If you answered the can, you might just be alive. Now what happens when you put a hole in the can? If you said the law of equilibrium would kick in and the pressure would escape into the simulated vacuum, you're showing sign's of life. Now can you find one scientific experiment that can separate a pressurized environment from a vacuum without using a physical barrier? Spoiler alert, you won't find one. Then ask yourself, how did they go to the moon if there has to be a physical barrier above us, to keep the atmosphere pressurized. How about looking for a scientific experiment that shows a spinning sphere sucking objects on the surface to the center of the mass? Or an experiment that shows the surface of water bending around a spinning sphere, that would account for our oceans on our theoretical round Earth? Spoiler alert again, there isn't any real science to back up the pagan sun worshipers 3rd Century B.C. heliocentric theory. All you will find is theories that validate theories. Paintings from space, drawings in books and Hollywood cgi to validate the Heliocentric theory. And while you were sound asleep, they've come up with a new theory to counter the motionless flat Earth. It's called the geocentric theory. And Dr. Robert Sungenis has made a movie about it called "The Principle." And has a video called "Galileo Was Wrong." So cook up some popcorn and enter the 21 Century theoretical universe, as seen on a boob tube near you.
Tiadiad, the ratio is irrelevant in the basic scientific fact, that a vacuum can't exist next to a pressurized environment without a physical barrier. You don't even need to see the barrier to know it has to be there. And I'm not assuming there's a physical barrier. I'm merely pointing out that since you assume there's a vacuum in space, that there's no real science to back up a pressurized atmosphere existing next to it without a physical barrier. Water won't pool unless contained. You also don't need to see the barrier that surrounds the motionless flat Earth to know it's there. Theory isn't science when it can't be demonstrated. Theory would be better named, the wishful thinking of the willfully ignorant. And no wishful thinking by an educated idiot, who was dumb enough to believe theory is reality would blow my mind. NASA has never given us a real picture of the entire Earth from space. So if you've seen a picture of the Earth, it's a painting/rendering/Hollywood cgi.
Every so often in physics and cosmology there arise insoluble problems. In the Big Bang theory we have the problem of explaining dark matter, dark energy, inflation, the fine tuning problem, the non-conformance with the law of conservation of energy. At the small scale we have the QM measurement problem, renormalisation, the lack of force unification, the difficulties in the standard model. Sometimes we just have to start again and look at the physical evidence and develop a new theory from first principles. This is a very hard step to take because there is so much already invested in the Big Bang theory and the Standard Model of particle physics. I have made an attempt at this starting from the General Theory of Relativity. The main difference in the new theory is to think of all particles as wave quanta. I am not talking about wave particle duality. Think of light as a wave disturbance of spacetime and electrons, neutrons and protons as looped wave disturbances of spacetime. It is proposed that this is the true nature of these particles. When you complete the calculation based on the mass, you find that the neutron and proton have three wavelengths in the loop. The quarks defined in the standard model do not really exist and have never been directly observed. www.academia.edu/5038836/The_Unification_of_Physics The alternative to the Big Bang theory which explains dark matter, dark energy and complies with conservation of energy is presented here. www.academia.edu/5009126/The_evolution_of_the_universe It requires a huge shift in mindset to consider these ideas but it is worth approaching the problem with an open mind and trying to consider the theories as viable alternatives to the Big Bang and the Standard Model of particle physics. Richard
Fascinating, is the second part anywhere - can't see it ? ie. He breaks for lunch to then I expect come back to cover WIMPs is that lecture around please ?
Supersymmetry is dead. Nina himself has stated he doesn’t buy the theory at all because it places humans at the center of creation. He advocates for a multiverse.
The Measurement Problem situation of Physics to Mathematics is explained in the Uncertainty aspect of Infinity/Eternity, AdS/CFT real-time i-reflection containment Holographic Principle in Correspondence to precise Theoretical Calculus analysis aspects of Mathematical Physics Conjectures. This is the stalling point of Experimentalist's practical Intuitions. Situation re-normalised in Projection Drawing holographic modulation interference Positioning resonance Perspective. WYSIWYG. Mostly Quantum Chemistry. Lost in Math?
Question at 7:53 ish. Are the bottom two abstracts, gradients of commonality? Are there other ways to organize the data to get different denominators? A 4:3 ratio, of parallel process three times, of four things in each, is the first set of the next cycle. Numbers are not my thing , shapes are easier for me to see. 1/2 is wrong whenever I see it, I get a string waving back and forth between the curves of two circles touching?
Let me note 0:56:05 where a scalar and a fermion known experimentally to have the same mass and charge are named, just to dismiss it. Not even a Star-Wars joke "Those are not the scalars you are looking for".
You have not seen the properties you are looking for because they are not in new undiscovered particles but are residing inside the known particles inner structure as "hidden variables". Stop assuming and regarding the elementary particles to be dimensionless dots. They have inner energy flow manifolds in the form of closed energy loops (strings) that are spinning and revolving at relativistic speed confined in a spherical volume in space.
Supersymmetry demands that every known particle has an equal mass susy particle. None were known to exist in nature when susy was invented (which means susy is NOT an exact symmetry of nature) and now we should be surprised non are found in nature?
As I said, he actually mentions two cases of fermion with equal mass with a boson, only to remark that they were both very confusing when discovered. Actually, one case happened before the theoretical invention of susy and the other happened later.
Why does the "Show More" Button no longer work in RUclips? Why did RUclips leave this non-functional button on the page? Does anybody at Google give a good G*ddamn? Is this the first sign of the end of Google?
Sleptons, Squarks, Gauginos, Gluinos........ I see new language has been invented since I read about quantum physics in my teens..... I understand none of this, but I can't stop watching.
If the chemistry of the Quantum Fields Mechanism is the first principle, then all phenomena are time duration phase-states with the characteristics observed. That situation would make the analysis of physical structure the same exercise as the more topical comparisons of the Cosmological spectrum, ie dynamic pictures of natural occurrences evolving across all scales, most of which is "dark". If the Anthropological version of the observable universe is mostly deducted from the the maths attached to what is comparable, then that's about all there is to use as a model, mathematical occurrence possible probability and evolution of computation. (?) It's undecidable if the universe is a psudo-random "living" event, or a recurrence of a less developed circumstance in evolution, but it's definitely pro-biological WYSIWYG, and "back engineering" the effect to find a cause reduces to QFM-Time cause-effect principle. _____ It's all about how you inflate (blow) bubbles of primes and cofactors of phase-locked multi-phase state e-Pi-i resonance. Primes are symmetric at the 0-1 Superposition node of reciprocal-modulation, so if you recognize 2 is actually a one-zero node between odd numbers 1&3, and zero-infinity positioning range is the "forbidden" reciprocal range of now in Eternity-now, (because you can't divide by zero difference.., unless you define Infinity as completeness of unity .dt->0), it changes everything perceived about the sequences of probability dominance, ..so pick primes by whole number intervals/"gaps" of harmonic liquidity in superimposed frequency,. Prime-ary connection which is implied in the "collapsed wave" (integration/calculus) line of sight to the vanishing point, ..Singularity, the distributed connection of modulated Spinfoam pulses, ..or holographic interference positioning of reciprocals. Now = reflection symmetry here, standing wave pulses in re-evolution, so all information has a half-life in the Eternity-Now reflection interval gradient 01 of superimposed probability. The duration of structures like WIMPs and SUSY may not be measurable in a similar manner to gravity waves? (A word picture of functions depends on common thought/imagination experience, ..best of luck) _____ In other words, if you can't see directly observed phenomena to account for these time duration objects, then it's because they are locked into inaccessible "darkness" that no amount of smashing open can be made to make effective methods of discovery. Perhaps gravity wave detection can get "inside" the darkness of fractal scaling. This was a "phenomenally" memorable lecture. ----- This becomes a kind of "Mathemagical" sentencing string of sequence addition, the superimposed positioning terms of the elemental constants in the e-Pi-i sync-duration Superspin In-form-ation substantiation function. More of the Navier-Stokes formatting in mass-energy-momentum Projection Drawing Conception Holographic Principle Imagery than metastable proportioning probability cause-effect stasis? Trying to hit a moving resonance targeted content in context target?
I have a idea of microspace 16 years ago who interchange energons end gons between them ie 1 and 0 in my licence thezis thats mins that whe have already teleportasion If we move but we don t realize time flow in quantum bits space ia discrete in a structure thetraedric form and every particule is something conected to a finite group
meh too easy . I was studying this when I was 16 and it was easy then and not worth my time , I have since moved on to more advanced physics than this childs play...
Ali Shehu yes I'm sorry I take issue with that comment......It happens when the brain cant cope for VERY obvious reasons......learn to be more "forgiving" and perhaps maybe, just maybe you could BE up there for others to pick fault with.
If it was zoomed in on his face you'd see the crazy blinks, too. It's just something we have to live with; I think the content more than makes up for his quirks.
Timothy Finnegan well said mate.we are not all perfect and that's a mathematical fact! I've had to bail on my Facebook account because of keyboard warriors.What a very sad world we live in AND you would think that anyone watching this video might have a shread of humanity I'm them but yet again I'm let down! Very sad indeed mate.As you put I think it's a small price to pay for a free lecture designed to enlighten.
How are cause and effect related, bothered the empiricists, 200 years ago. Since then they, failed to find the connection and settled for an answer which says 'they are independent'. For example a billiard ball discharging energy to another ball, or when you burn a piece of paper chemical energy is transformed into thermal energy, when cause is related to effect. This relation turns out not to be a physical factor, but a mathematical one. This factor is the complex number i. When the complex number z=x+iy has two variables x and y, change in y due to change in x, becomes clear when f(z) is mapped onto the w-plane.The complex number i is defined as the ratio of the rate of change with y of the image f to the rate of change with y of the image f when f is mapped onto w-plane. Explained in Visual Complex Analysis by Tristan Needham, page 217. Pythagoras at the beginning of the Greek civilization, declared 'everything in the universe are NUMBERS'. Complex numbers describe many other physical phenomenon/processes. For such an important philosophical revelation of physical reality, I have not seen any peer's review or a publication in any mathematical journal. Perhaps 'mind of god' is what he meant to say.
"Susy and the Wimps" would be a good rock band name.
I just checked and believe it or not, there's actually already an album with that name!
www.amazon.co.uk/Alien-Landing-Party-Susy-Wimps/dp/B00CHV104K
Possibly a physical based gothic cover band? Oh oh oh your city has Fallen to entropaeic decay!
Sorry scant write lyrics - city lies in dust -> becomes?
Underrated comment
Meet Susy: ruclips.net/video/UFPg-qgLiS0/видео.html
Have been a fan of Nima since watching ‘Particle Fever’ on the discovery of the Higgs. A must watch for all particle physics buffs and free on RUclips
An amazing lecturer, interesting and even humorous at times. I understand little and yet I'm fascinated.
Fkkjoj
Klhklglffl
F
A very interesting lecture. It is not often that anyone takes the time to step back and tell this story.
this is basically the standard story as told by any textbook on the subject. Not only that, but at the end of the talk he states his preference amongst the hypotheses as the MSSM which is precisely the most popular and conservative model that most physicists adopt on the subject (for many reasons including simplicity and plausibility, but also popular precisely because it is conservative and the opinions of one's peers still counts for something in the physics community). I'm glad you enjoyed it but it most certainly isn't the road less travelled. It is simply the story of why for most the MSSM (or CMSSM) is the currently preferred model.
This dude is such a rock star.
Nima is a beast.. i love his lectures.
Watching Nima pacing back and forwards in front of a sea of equation-stuffed blackboards while he agonizes over the limits of his knowledge is breathtaking to watch. Wonderful stuff.
🙄
Watch video at increased speed for additional mind-blow.
what about slow motion? it is more hilarious.
Tyler Jordan 😂😃😀
I love when Nima says "who knows this... you really should know this." ;-)
The fact that he finished talking just as the blackboard was dry is astonishing.
Saving comment here to remember to revisit :)
This is a good lecture for all modern physicists to memorize. I'll explain why later.
Seeing this lecture on supersymmetry leaves out 'imaginary ' values in quarks in protons. In the colliders these are invisible at the vanishing points. You can't see them directly . You need low energy methods to get their evidence such as protons in organic physics. Susy may be knowable then in organics only. Electrons are apparantly fractional when susy is on ie negatives in square roots. Like superconducting at low T.
Please tell me where the next lecture in this series is
amazing lecture
I want the next part of the lecture though! Why minimally split SUSY solves both of them?
2 years on and still no susy or wimps or axions.
When are we going to abandon the bloody thing?
Never. Scientists are some of the most dogmatic people. Plus if that’s their career, they only know how to write papers on that topic, so they continue. Approx 500 papers per year on Supersymmetry posted to arxiv since 1991 and not a shred of evidence lol.
I loved this an the only thing i understood was the title :)
Darthdrezz ppppppp
same loll
OMG, too attractive title.
Good talk from a man that really knows what the hell he's talking about.
If anyone believes gravity exists and spends there time trying to comprehend it, they're out of their freaking mind. This is voodoo science and you have to like voodoo to appreciate what this guy knows.
Tiadiad, we live in a contained environment. And as long as God keeps the motionless flat Earth pressurized, there's no more danger of floating off into space then there is of falling off the edge. But you're probably a theory believer and wouldn't know anything about reality.
Tiadiad, you're a theory/fiction believer, which allows you to not see the reality that is plainly and scientifically before you. God says the reason you've chosen this false reality, is willful ignorance. You're stupid on purppose and there's isn't anything anyone can do for you. You have to decided to think and see for yourself. If you're happy with your pseudoscience reality, then keep it.
Raymond, you've obviously never given this subject much thought. Which tells me you have no idea that your education was really an indoctrination, and you probably know very little that's true. And I'm not a doctor and don't know how to bring one of you zombie's back to reality. I can only suggest stop taking the blue pills and wake the hell up.
I guess I could give you the benefit of the doubt and assume you still have some free brain cells that aren't full of theoretical nonsense. So lets see if your really alive.
Do you know what equilibrium is? Now picture a can of aerosol paint. Inside the can is a pressurized atmosphere. Outside of the can would represent an unpressurized atmosphere in a ratio comparable to the theoretical vacuum of space.
Now what keeps the aerosol paint from escaping into the surrounding atmosphere? If you answered the can, you might just be alive.
Now what happens when you put a hole in the can? If you said the law of equilibrium would kick in and the pressure would escape into the simulated vacuum, you're showing sign's of life.
Now can you find one scientific experiment that can separate a pressurized environment from a vacuum without using a physical barrier? Spoiler alert, you won't find one.
Then ask yourself, how did they go to the moon if there has to be a physical barrier above us, to keep the atmosphere pressurized.
How about looking for a scientific experiment that shows a spinning sphere sucking objects on the surface to the center of the mass? Or an experiment that shows the surface of water bending around a spinning sphere, that would account for our oceans on our theoretical round Earth? Spoiler alert again, there isn't any real science to back up the pagan sun worshipers 3rd Century B.C. heliocentric theory.
All you will find is theories that validate theories. Paintings from space, drawings in books and Hollywood cgi to validate the Heliocentric theory.
And while you were sound asleep, they've come up with a new theory to counter the motionless flat Earth. It's called the geocentric theory. And Dr. Robert Sungenis has made a movie about it called "The Principle." And has a video called "Galileo Was Wrong." So cook up some popcorn and enter the 21 Century theoretical universe, as seen on a boob tube near you.
Tiadiad, the ratio is irrelevant in the basic scientific fact, that a vacuum can't exist next to a pressurized environment without a physical barrier. You don't even need to see the barrier to know it has to be there. And I'm not assuming there's a physical barrier. I'm merely pointing out that since you assume there's a vacuum in space, that there's no real science to back up a pressurized atmosphere existing next to it without a physical barrier.
Water won't pool unless contained. You also don't need to see the barrier that surrounds the motionless flat Earth to know it's there.
Theory isn't science when it can't be demonstrated. Theory would be better named, the wishful thinking of the willfully ignorant. And no wishful thinking by an educated idiot, who was dumb enough to believe theory is reality would blow my mind.
NASA has never given us a real picture of the entire Earth from space. So if you've seen a picture of the Earth, it's a painting/rendering/Hollywood cgi.
Every so often in physics and cosmology there arise insoluble problems. In the Big Bang theory we have the problem of explaining dark matter, dark energy, inflation, the fine tuning problem, the non-conformance with the law of conservation of energy.
At the small scale we have the QM measurement problem, renormalisation, the lack of force unification, the difficulties in the standard model.
Sometimes we just have to start again and look at the physical evidence and develop a new theory from first principles. This is a very hard step to take because there is so much already invested in the Big Bang theory and the Standard Model of particle physics.
I have made an attempt at this starting from the General Theory of Relativity. The main difference in the new theory is to think of all particles as wave quanta. I am not talking about wave particle duality. Think of light as a wave disturbance of spacetime and electrons, neutrons and protons as looped wave disturbances of spacetime. It is proposed that this is the true nature of these particles.
When you complete the calculation based on the mass, you find that the neutron and proton have three wavelengths in the loop. The quarks defined in the standard model do not really exist and have never been directly observed.
www.academia.edu/5038836/The_Unification_of_Physics
The alternative to the Big Bang theory which explains dark matter, dark energy and complies with conservation of energy is presented here.
www.academia.edu/5009126/The_evolution_of_the_universe
It requires a huge shift in mindset to consider these ideas but it is worth approaching the problem with an open mind and trying to consider the theories as viable alternatives to the Big Bang and the Standard Model of particle physics.
Richard
@Ron Maimon What? Why? We're clearly missing something, and he made an attempt to think outside the box. It's just a theory. You're stupid.
unsolvable not insoluble..
Fascinating, is the second part anywhere - can't see it ?
ie. He breaks for lunch to then I expect come back to cover WIMPs is that lecture around please ?
WIMPs are aired at around 33 minutes.
You are The Man, sorry I don't mention you in my book but I only had room for 3 physicists
Susy?! AMOGUS Susy bakaaaa
Nima dresses like me on a Sunday.
This guy has been teached by Susskind?
What a beautiful minds and they try to keep it simple...
Why haven’t we seen Susy and Wimps. Do we need a higher collider to find them.
Supersymmetry is dead. Nina himself has stated he doesn’t buy the theory at all because it places humans at the center of creation.
He advocates for a multiverse.
hes not wearing that cargo shorts
SUSY will never be found. Time to acknowledge that.
True but SUSY might
@@oliverquinonez3919 you got me 😁
😂
where is the following day lecture ?
ruclips.net/video/mRMF4b0GcCw/видео.html
The WIMPs wimped-out. Bada Boom Bada Bing.
Back to the drawing board. Literally.
Thanks for the info!!!
we are more like to find suzy than susy.
The Measurement Problem situation of Physics to Mathematics is explained in the Uncertainty aspect of Infinity/Eternity, AdS/CFT real-time i-reflection containment Holographic Principle in Correspondence to precise Theoretical Calculus analysis aspects of Mathematical Physics Conjectures. This is the stalling point of Experimentalist's practical Intuitions. Situation re-normalised in Projection Drawing holographic modulation interference Positioning resonance Perspective. WYSIWYG. Mostly Quantum Chemistry. Lost in Math?
Somebody needs to invent an audio filter than removes AH and UM. This guy is maddening.
"any questions about this so far?" :D
I do believe that it’s a nonsense to go on with spending so much money trying to find out the not existing DM particles.
NIMA!!! That skullet has got to go!
Time to let people dream about these concepts on their own time using their own money. It has little to do with physics which is an empirical science.
Watching him makes me remember my first beer too!
Question at 7:53 ish. Are the bottom two abstracts, gradients of commonality? Are there other ways to organize the data to get different denominators? A 4:3 ratio, of parallel process three times, of four things in each, is the first set of the next cycle. Numbers are not my thing , shapes are easier for me to see. 1/2 is wrong whenever I see it, I get a string waving back and forth between the curves of two circles touching?
Comment at 23:00 , RGB : ( v/p : t/b) : RYB Mechanical and fluid in contrast.
Let me note 0:56:05 where a scalar and a fermion known experimentally to have the same mass and charge are named, just to dismiss it. Not even a Star-Wars joke "Those are not the scalars you are looking for".
Is the next day's lecture available somewhere?
yes, go to the Institute of Advanced Study website, and you will see the the list of lectures from this summer program..
You have not seen the properties you are looking for because they are not in new undiscovered particles but are residing inside the known particles inner structure as "hidden variables". Stop assuming and regarding the elementary particles to be dimensionless dots. They have inner energy flow manifolds in the form of closed energy loops (strings) that are spinning and revolving at relativistic speed confined in a spherical volume in space.
Supersymmetry demands that every known particle has an equal mass susy particle. None were known to exist in nature when susy was invented (which means susy is NOT an exact symmetry of nature) and now we should be surprised non are found in nature?
As I said, he actually mentions two cases of fermion with equal mass with a boson, only to remark that they were both very confusing when discovered. Actually, one case happened before the theoretical invention of susy and the other happened later.
sum BTC ......hold on, none is found so far with available energy.
Not equal mass. The symmetry doesn't relate to all properties. They are partners, not identical copies.
Why does the "Show More" Button no longer work in RUclips? Why did RUclips leave this non-functional button on the page? Does anybody at Google give a good G*ddamn? Is this the first sign of the end of Google?
Conclusion: reality is more complex than we thought... but tuning this flawed mathematical model maybe we can get a real result...
Sleptons, Squarks, Gauginos, Gluinos........ I see new language has been invented since I read about quantum physics in my teens..... I understand none of this, but I can't stop watching.
I didn't know the ripper is so dope on quantum physics....
checking your watch... where you got to be that I don’t? I’m here to learn... oops lunch! Gotcha!
This guy really should get a hair cut.
Keep it short when you start to Bald
Bruh, teach is wearing socks with sandals. He doesn’t care.
@@bay4west he should
When the wimps are sussy‼️😳
when imposta is SUS
1:28:27 LOL
If the chemistry of the Quantum Fields Mechanism is the first principle, then all phenomena are time duration phase-states with the characteristics observed. That situation would make the analysis of physical structure the same exercise as the more topical comparisons of the Cosmological spectrum, ie dynamic pictures of natural occurrences evolving across all scales, most of which is "dark".
If the Anthropological version of the observable universe is mostly deducted from the the maths attached to what is comparable, then that's about all there is to use as a model, mathematical occurrence possible probability and evolution of computation. (?)
It's undecidable if the universe is a psudo-random "living" event, or a recurrence of a less developed circumstance in evolution, but it's definitely pro-biological WYSIWYG, and "back engineering" the effect to find a cause reduces to QFM-Time cause-effect principle.
_____
It's all about how you inflate (blow) bubbles of primes and cofactors of phase-locked multi-phase state e-Pi-i resonance.
Primes are symmetric at the 0-1 Superposition node of reciprocal-modulation, so if you recognize 2 is actually a one-zero node between odd numbers 1&3, and zero-infinity positioning range is the "forbidden" reciprocal range of now in Eternity-now, (because you can't divide by zero difference.., unless you define Infinity as completeness of unity .dt->0), it changes everything perceived about the sequences of probability dominance, ..so pick primes by whole number intervals/"gaps" of harmonic liquidity in superimposed frequency,. Prime-ary connection which is implied in the "collapsed wave" (integration/calculus) line of sight to the vanishing point, ..Singularity, the distributed connection of modulated Spinfoam pulses, ..or holographic interference positioning of reciprocals.
Now = reflection symmetry here, standing wave pulses in re-evolution, so all information has a half-life in the Eternity-Now reflection interval gradient 01 of superimposed probability. The duration of structures like WIMPs and SUSY may not be measurable in a similar manner to gravity waves?
(A word picture of functions depends on common thought/imagination experience, ..best of luck)
_____
In other words, if you can't see directly observed phenomena to account for these time duration objects, then it's because they are locked into inaccessible "darkness" that no amount of smashing open can be made to make effective methods of discovery. Perhaps gravity wave detection can get "inside" the darkness of fractal scaling.
This was a "phenomenally" memorable lecture.
-----
This becomes a kind of "Mathemagical" sentencing string of sequence addition, the superimposed positioning terms of the elemental constants in the e-Pi-i sync-duration Superspin In-form-ation substantiation function. More of the Navier-Stokes formatting in mass-energy-momentum Projection Drawing Conception Holographic Principle Imagery than metastable proportioning probability cause-effect stasis?
Trying to hit a moving resonance targeted content in context target?
Woof?
Woof!
Why are we alive? Because...
Because we are
I have a idea of microspace 16 years ago who interchange energons end gons between them ie 1 and 0 in my licence thezis thats mins that whe have already teleportasion If we move but we don t realize time flow in quantum bits space ia discrete in a structure thetraedric form and every particule is something conected to a finite group
i like nima lecture
Too technical for me.
Susy's serving in the bar, and the wimps dare not order.
amogus
physics should finally get over string theory and supersymetry
6:55 listen at 0.25 speed... that's the sound my grandfather's old creaky rocking chair makes
He dropped a twenty
Sussy
Sounds like BS to me - particle physics are lost - up & down; backwards & forwards; left & right; ba k & forth just like M. Arkani Hamed's lectures..
Why would you say that?
Anyone else watching this in their wimp suit?
Sorry to say, but this guy is just another victim of the Standard Model. What a terrible waste.
"There is a general expectation that coloured particles are heaviest"
Just like with coloured people (in the US, at least)!
Grow the hell up.
nima came from saudi royal family, he was and still is a prince.
He is Canadian of Iranian descent.
Can this man not just stand in one place just for a minute ? SOmeone needs to tell him that his strolling is horribly distracting.
Perypatein was how Aristotle conducted his lectures.
meh too easy . I was studying this when I was 16 and it was easy then and not worth my time , I have since moved on to more advanced physics than this childs play...
Kal Jabrane - I think he was joking, you know? Making a joke?
stop dissing Trump or go back to Mexico!
The "a" "a" "a" pauses are killing me; it is literally making it impossible to listen to. Please Nima, learn to cut those off. Apologies, if offended.
Ali Shehu ....how do you dare be so petty! L suggest you absent yourself from other of his lectures.
Funny, did not bother me one bit.
Ali Shehu yes I'm sorry I take issue with that comment......It happens when the brain cant cope for VERY obvious reasons......learn to be more "forgiving" and perhaps maybe, just maybe you could BE up there for others to pick fault with.
If it was zoomed in on his face you'd see the crazy blinks, too. It's just something we have to live with; I think the content more than makes up for his quirks.
Timothy Finnegan well said mate.we are not all perfect and that's a mathematical fact!
I've had to bail on my Facebook account because of keyboard warriors.What a very sad world we live in AND you would think that anyone watching this video might have a shread of humanity I'm them but yet again I'm let down!
Very sad indeed mate.As you put I think it's a small price to pay for a free lecture designed to enlighten.
How are cause and effect related, bothered the empiricists, 200 years ago. Since then they, failed to find the connection and settled for an answer which says 'they are independent'. For example a billiard ball discharging energy to another ball, or when you burn a piece of paper chemical energy is transformed into thermal energy, when cause is related to effect. This relation turns out not to be a physical factor, but a mathematical one. This factor is the complex number i.
When the complex number z=x+iy has two variables x and y, change in y due to change in x, becomes clear when f(z) is mapped onto the w-plane.The complex number i is defined as the ratio of the rate of change with y of the image f to the rate of change with y of the image f when f is mapped onto w-plane.
Explained in Visual Complex Analysis by Tristan Needham, page 217.
Pythagoras at the beginning of the Greek civilization, declared 'everything in the universe are NUMBERS'. Complex numbers describe many other physical phenomenon/processes.
For such an important philosophical revelation of physical reality, I have not seen any peer's review or a publication in any mathematical journal.
Perhaps 'mind of god' is what he meant to say.
Ian Mangham - a pencil must be lead .
Perhaps there are no peer reviewed articles because it's gibberish?
So he is basically proposing en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Split_supersymmetry as "solution".