Unreal Engine free assets January 2025 Part 1 - One asset is very suspicious

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 14 янв 2025

Комментарии • 47

  • @coondog7934
    @coondog7934 20 часов назад +10

    Thank you!
    Appreciated that you go into details with the blueprints, explaining roughly how it works and what the pros and cons of this particular approach are and revealing things like that dumb dirscord fake verification rating. It helps to determine if the asset (or any other assets of this creator) is worth getting.

    • @LeafBranchGames
      @LeafBranchGames  20 часов назад +1

      I appreciate the feedback. I am happy that I am able to be candid and give as accurate information as I can.

  • @ايليأادونيس
    @ايليأادونيس 4 часа назад +2

    very brutal with the blueprint assets hhaha no you always on point great job

  • @mwwoggy
    @mwwoggy 20 часов назад +4

    Thanks for the video. Appreciate your candidness regarding he Blueprint Asset - wholeheartedly agree!

    • @LeafBranchGames
      @LeafBranchGames  20 часов назад +1

      Thank you, I believe it is important to be transparent and honest. Also, it is part of my job to be on the side of consumers to make sure they are given all the information.

  • @dav1dparker
    @dav1dparker 19 часов назад +4

    Wow, this apartment asset is EXACTLY what I need now.
    I'd like to see more modern assets. I have too much sci-fi and fantasy stuff already.

  • @paluxyl.8682
    @paluxyl.8682 9 часов назад +3

    I think your character was at 4:11 too far from the enemy to play the correct finishing animation (grab from behind and slice).
    Does this parry pack come with any animation ?

    • @LeafBranchGames
      @LeafBranchGames  7 часов назад +1

      It wasn't too far. If it was too far, then the player would not attack. Do keep in mind the player does not have an attack, it is a "finishing blow".
      The pack have a couple of animations.

    • @paluxyl.8682
      @paluxyl.8682 6 часов назад +1

      @@LeafBranchGames Thanks, I was just wondering because in the demo video of the creator is an grab animation from behind.

    • @LeafBranchGames
      @LeafBranchGames  Час назад +1

      @@paluxyl.8682 I doubt that animation is in this asset.

  • @dwain.d
    @dwain.d 12 часов назад +2

    I think I got that bakery in a Humble Bundle a while ago. It looks really familiar. I don't mind taking things that I can modify/flip props from for prototyping and also to save time. It's not fair to compare free to paid but if anyone is serious about this hobby then it's more worthwhile to periodically check Humble for collections of great assets and packs for very cheap prices. With this new model I'm not expecting much from the free collection anymore. Unless they include some more cathedrals and then I can finally make a cathedral from cathedrals.

    • @LeafBranchGames
      @LeafBranchGames  6 часов назад +1

      Humble bundle is for sure a resource that gives good offers from time to time. Which is why I used to cover it in the past. Maybe I should do it again.

  • @blenderahoi-jb5ol
    @blenderahoi-jb5ol 17 часов назад +1

    Thanks for the video!
    For me it's like always: Take everything with you first. Since I didn't notice what it used to be like in the old and better days, I'm happy about what's there. I'll probably only actually use a fraction, but it increases the choice I have. If I ever want something specific, I'll have to buy it anyway. Anyway, I wish everyone a few nice winter days!

    • @LeafBranchGames
      @LeafBranchGames  6 часов назад +1

      It is of course smart to take what you can, because you never know what you may have use of in the future.

  • @ryanjdev87
    @ryanjdev87 14 часов назад +3

    The dev for the parry system is friends with gorka, clydie and threepeat. they did a podcast recently together talking about combat fury. I'm sure he would correct this if he knows. But yes I agree with you leaf

    • @LeafBranchGames
      @LeafBranchGames  6 часов назад

      Somehow, it makes a lot of sense that Gorkas name would popup in conjunction with something like this.

    • @EmeraldStudioSweden
      @EmeraldStudioSweden 5 часов назад +1

      @@LeafBranchGames Haha varför så savage? 😂

    • @LeafBranchGames
      @LeafBranchGames  Час назад

      @ Just disappointed in peoples dishonesty I guess. Sometiems it overflows.

  • @Rusty0621
    @Rusty0621 20 часов назад +1

    This is actually the second bunch of free assets for January. There were the Pirate Stilt Village Island, the Skeleton Guard (Modular), and the Comicbook cutscene available earlier this month. But these being released during the holidays (and not particularly amazing packs, on par with the new trend) it's understandable they were missed.

    • @LeafBranchGames
      @LeafBranchGames  20 часов назад +1

      Unfortunately no, what you are referring to is a December asset give away.
      Which you can see as I released a video on it the day it was released, the 31:st of December.
      ruclips.net/video/TRIwtAgasjo/видео.html

    • @Rusty0621
      @Rusty0621 19 часов назад

      @@LeafBranchGames Right, so they're going on a strict 14 days period for each asset releases rather than being just twice a month (it's a bit of a nitpick on my part here because it will balance out eventually, but we can expect 3 releases for July and December)

    • @LeafBranchGames
      @LeafBranchGames  19 часов назад +1

      @@Rusty0621 Yes, exactly. Bi weekly, which will lead to irregular patterns from time to time. Might feel a bit pecualiar because we had the regularity per month before. Keep track of every other week is more difficult.

  • @THISISMYHANDLETODAY
    @THISISMYHANDLETODAY 20 часов назад +8

    RIP good free assets... last year was the golden year of free from epic lol

  • @Cody-th6gw
    @Cody-th6gw 20 часов назад +3

    I purchased the parry attack system for a project some time ago and was always curious about why they implemented that ridiculous verification system. Thanks for clearing that up, pretty scummy system they've set up.

    • @LeafBranchGames
      @LeafBranchGames  20 часов назад

      Indeed. Bad actors exist everywhere. Too seldom do they get a spotlight on their behavior. :/

  • @ABentPaperclip
    @ABentPaperclip 20 часов назад +6

    this might be the first time in years that I'm just not even gonna bother getting the free assets. i don't need this crap junking up my asset library. I'd rather Epic give away a single asset per month that was actually useful and high quality than 6 pieces of garbage that aren't worth anyone's time

    • @LeafBranchGames
      @LeafBranchGames  20 часов назад +3

      I can understand the sentiment for sure. But it might be worth getting simply because you never know what you will have use of in the future. But of course, that is an individual choice.

  • @DavidGWilliams1981
    @DavidGWilliams1981 14 часов назад

    You are correct, requiring 5 star review to be "verified" is total shit.

  • @CCGS
    @CCGS 14 часов назад +1

    Woooow what scumbag behavior. Release a product and the only way they'll actually give customers the support they need to get it working they basically extort them? Disgusting... thanks for highlighting that.

  • @kellowattentertainment
    @kellowattentertainment 2 часа назад +1

    The current implementation of the parry system is inherently flawed because a parry system cannot be isolated from the combat system it is meant to complement. It makes little sense to treat the parry system as a standalone feature, as every combat system varies significantly in design, mechanics, and flow.
    Rather than attempting to retrofit parts of a generic parry system into different combat systems, it would be far more effective to design a complete combat system where the parry mechanics are integrated seamlessly from the outset. This approach ensures that the parry system aligns with the unique requirements and dynamics of the combat system, leading to a more cohesive and effective gameplay experience.
    That being said, I have a suggestion for a tutorial. A melee combat system, including parry mechanics.

    • @LeafBranchGames
      @LeafBranchGames  Час назад

      This is true, a parry system is usually a way too intricate part of a larger combat system, so for many it would not be usuable unless they had this at the start and built around it.
      Thanks for the suggestion!

  • @microbprod
    @microbprod 5 часов назад +2

    This is sad that Epic Games forgets about UE4, giving for us free garbage for UE5 only last time... This is very rare when they drop asset, that supports UE4, but even in that case it is garbage with 99% chance.

    • @LeafBranchGames
      @LeafBranchGames  Час назад

      It is true, many people who create assets may focus on UE5 instead of having many different versions up to date, which may have to function quite differently. Which version are you on? 4.26? 4.27?

    • @microbprod
      @microbprod Час назад

      ​@@LeafBranchGames I'm using 4.27 as most stable version of the engine.

    • @LeafBranchGames
      @LeafBranchGames  Час назад

      @@microbprod Be assured, if I ever make an asset and release on the store, I will make sure to include a few 4.X versions. :)

  • @andreww4751
    @andreww4751 20 часов назад +2

    Does the parry pack have animations that are new/not present in available anim packs like ALS, Paragon etc. ? If so it could be valuable just for that, animations are always valuable imo.

    • @LeafBranchGames
      @LeafBranchGames  20 часов назад

      The amount of animations are very few. So not really much on that side unfortunately.

  • @bpsystems
    @bpsystems 27 минут назад

    Hey, criticizing the asset is fair, to not like it is also fair. But to claim I asked users to give me good rating to get verified and access support is not true and not fair at all. I always asked users to use the questions section for verification, and everyone in my Discord knows it. Please investigate collect facts and correct this false claim.

    • @bpsystems
      @bpsystems 18 минут назад

      you can clearly see that there was a typo, I missed typing (DO NOT). my phrase ( you can simply post your Discord in the questions section instead) valid that. also this reply was because the user gave it a 5 star.

  • @kellowattentertainment
    @kellowattentertainment 17 часов назад +2

    More garbage especially the blueprint assets. It's like they don't check the quality of the assets they give for free. Zero Animations...

    • @LeafBranchGames
      @LeafBranchGames  6 часов назад

      I hope it is that they are aloppy in their checking, rather than very few people actually applying to have their assets in the giveaway events.

    • @kellowattentertainment
      @kellowattentertainment 2 часа назад

      @@LeafBranchGames It seems that the primary issue lies in the fact that the creators Epic aims to attract for the giveaway events are not applying. This is perplexing, especially considering that participation comes with monetary compensation.
      The lack of applications from talented creators may indicate a general disinterest or a lack of awareness about the opportunity. In contrast, those who do apply often submit subpar assets, seemingly using the giveaway as a way to offload content that lacks quality.
      To address this challenge, I propose the establishment of a dedicated outreach team. This team would proactively engage with skilled creators, informing them of the benefits of participating in the event, including the opportunity to be compensated for each "purchase" of their assets. By doing so, Epic can ensure higher-quality submissions and a more successful event overall.

    • @LeafBranchGames
      @LeafBranchGames  Час назад

      @@kellowattentertainment Some sort of effort along those lines is highly needed for sure.
      I do believe the monetary incentive is too weak, which will allow these lower end assets to appear. I don't think Epic will change that aspect.
      The only other appealing aspect would be exposure. To have an asset of high quality be used in a give away for the spotlight of the quality, which can make the creator an appealing source of future purchases.
      But who knows, maybe they are doing just fine and the extra spotlight is not worthwhile.