Using the V8 formation, you may need to add a brace in the center to keep the spinning rods from bending. Otherwise you might have to use rods that are so thick they rob you of efficiency. Of course an extra set of bearings on the rods will also reduce efficiency, but I think not as much.
everytime the pole number increase so do the lock area... so if 1 doesnt work make it 8 will mean 8 new lock area even with properly balanced angle 1 lock will still be there to stop the whole system. the locking is indeed the hardest(where almost all engineer say its imposible)
You need a corresponding magnet or electromagnet at the crank to repel and attract the pistons in conjunction with the timing of the magnets at the top of the piston. It wouldn't hurt to put in a partial gear to assist the crank's rotation where the crank is weak in its rotation: This can also aid in maintaining timing mechanically. If it were me building this, I would use a hybrid magnet and electromagnet setup. I would use the electromagnet as a starter and have it reengage to assist and minimize wear at the helper gears. You can even mount a sensor on the gears to turn the electromagnetic assist into a mechanical and self-sustained timing feature.
If everything is equitative shape/orientation symmetrical, you''ll have same attraction/repulsion vectors of magnetic force. I may be wrong, but i dare to say it wont work. You need an unbalance mechanism to produce movement. I dont see it here. For instance, devices like a magneto-gravitic can takes advantage (like the rotating wheel project where a magnet constant attracts a steel ball and the ball by friction rotates the wheel... its just an example). Here, everything is symmetrical(surfaces, shapes, distances, etc)... So when you think on repulsion/attraction movement, you must think the opposite conterpart.
IT'S GOOD TO SEE SOMEBODY THINK OUTSIDE THE BOX, I'M A OLD GUY AND I HAVE TO SAY I DON'T SEE IT THAT MUCH ANYMORE. YOUR IDEA MIGHT MAKE A PERPETUAL MOTION IDEA BUT IT WON'T DO ANY WORK, BUT KEEP DREAMING
Try mixing up the magnets driving the megnetic pistons at the ends of each polarity so you have a more gradual flow from one magnetic pole to the next. This may help to reduce put back. Edit: great design!
Em seu modelo sempre faltará um pulso que anule o campo magnético cruzado e que é possível de se fazer com uma bobina que corte o primeiro campo e gere pulso para a segunda e assim por diante!
Unless you used it in a complete vacuum with zero gravity, you would need some kind of sleeves to support the pistons which will cause too much friction.
Just made one out of Lego technic in 30 mins. One problem is that the pistons had to be further away from each other so they won’t clog. The main problem is that the crankshaft doesn’t produce enough torque to turn the magnets at the end of the pistons. Doesn’t really work with all gear ratios that I used or what size piston strokes.
This is not going to work. You might get it to turn for a while under no load, until friction stops it, but as soon as you try to draw power out of this system, it will instantly stop. When you want to rotate those round magnets that push the pistons, you‘ll have to invest the energy that the piston produces, because the magnetic field of the piston will resist the rotation
I liked everything my man. I was a young boy 8 and I had this idea and the part I needed was your top 2 bars of magnets. I have a car idea and home power too. Please contact me I'm free for everyone that wants perfection
"Charging" a magnet is equivalent to producing a spring. A magnet does work afterwards if someone has invested work, for example pushing two magnets together with a common pole and then repelling them - that's the returned work from the previous investment of pushing. Likewise, a spring does work if someone pushes or stretches it. Therefore, the magnet (nor the spring) does no work from their production, but from the input work in their finished form. Over time, the magnetism decreases, just as the elasticity of the spring decreases. Production energy (energy supplied during production) is not work potential. It's the same as making a bicycle - it allows you to ride with the energy of your muscles. If the concepts are unified and the meanings are distinguished, you yourself will come to the realization that a perpetual motion machine with pistons is a completely useless waste of your time.
I have one question this reminds me of a conventional combustion engine will you need a lubricant for the “” piston “” the magnets that move up and down? Won’t it create heat and lock it up if there was not a lubricant?
Positive comments give energy and criticizing and opposing comments are informative. I am not looking for positive opinion, all opinions are respected, we learn together. And we gain experience
No motor can work without an energy supply. Every movement has to be compensated for in order for it to be repeated. Experimenters trying to achieve 'perpetual motion' come to realise that. Whether movement is achieved by magnets or gravity or something else you get only one movement as it uses up energy stored in it. Then you have to replace the stored energy to get further movement. Simple! Movement of anything is caused by energy so there can be no motion without energy being applied or stored energy used up. Sorry, no perpetual machines.
I have recently built a different design magnetic engine using a real throttle and an automatic transmission in a pickup truck. Total completion due in about a month of this posting
I had a rotational one using a bicycle wheel that worked, but only for a couple minutes then would slow down and stop. I think this was due to magnetic flux expanding and I gave up before finding a way to disperse or reuse the excess magnetic flux. I had no way of measuring the flux to verify this though. I am wondering if you experience the same thing?
@@andreasschmitt2307 No, because it accelerated on it's own. I had discovered a different reaction with magnets when you use the side of it next to a pole on the other magnet, it will push it sideways. Try it. It's pretty cool.
@@danielfeyerabend904 I only tried Ferrite material. It did not help. LOL What I did was this. Take 2 magnets and hold them beside each other. Then rotate 1 90 degrees. You'll feel the magnet want to slide, or push sideways the other one. Line them up along the edge of a bicycle wheel in the same orientation. Then mount the actuating magnet close to the wheel. You will see what I mean. I tried to make the actuating magnet spin like a cam. Pull-slide-push for 180 degree rotation for each magnet on the wheel. For this, every other magnet must be 180 degrees rotated on the wheel. I got a linear plastic gear and mounted it around the wheel and had a pinion gear to spin the actuating gear. That did not do as well as the slide method though. I may revisit it some day. I still have the wheel, but it is stored in the garage and the foam board I used to mount the linear gear is all warped after spending a full day on getting it true round to keep the air gap consistent. LOL UGH!!!!! I could use that as a template still though.
هذا النمزذج سوف يحقق توازن بين القطبين الشمالي والجنوبي مما يؤدي الى توقف الدوران .لا يمكن تحقيق محرك مغناطيسي دائم الحركة الا بأبتكار مادة عازلة .ابتكار مادة عازلة للمغناطيس سيجعل الطاقة مجانية في العالم واظن ان وجود هكذا مادة منافي لقانون الطبيعة
It wouldn't work. The bottom of the magnets would repel each other and bind up, not allowing a full stroke, which would seize the motion of the stroke.
I'm wondering if an inline 6 configuration might work..? Reason why is all the big diesel engine makers like this configuration due to its efficiency and reliability.
The configuration is irrelevant. Never mind what configuration is chosen, this design does not work. Permanent magnets are not a source of energy and can't drive a motor. In contrast, burning diesel does deliver energy.
So for a second, let’s imagine you spin the crank shaft and it continued on its own. Let’s imagine you’ve solved the issue of friction. How much work could possibly be harvested before it stops? How long could it possibly sustain just its own rotation? You can forget about harvesting work from it. Now realize you can’t solve the friction problem. Remember not low friction, zero friction !! And harvest energy from it. You’re animation is a nice design study. But it’s an exercise in CAD, not physics.
It cant work because the energi is equil 4 magnets push and 4 mag. pulls = no movement Thy to design it so avery time 6magnet will be pushing the system, and 2 pulling , this must produce some motion.
Question: how much energy is used to produce/ charge the magnets? Is the energy produced by the device more or less of the energy neede to charge the magnets?
"Charging" a magnet is equivalent to producing a spring. A magnet does work afterwards if someone has invested work, for example pushing two magnets together with a common pole and then repelling them - that's the returned work from the previous investment of pushing. Likewise, a spring does work if someone pushes or stretches it. Therefore, the magnet (nor the spring) does no work from their production, but from the input work in their finished form. Over time, the magnetism decreases, just as the elasticity of the spring decreases. Production energy (energy supplied during production) is not work potential. It's the same as making a bicycle - it allows you to ride with the energy of your muscles. If the concepts are unified and the meanings are distinguished, you yourself will come to the realization that a perpetual motion machine with pistons is a completely useless waste of your time.
I don't entirely agree. The comparison between a magnet and a bicycle can only hold true as regards the materials used, the assembly of the rare earths. In order to work, the magnet must be subjected to an enormous electric discharge and it is this that gives it its characteristics, which are not unlimited. A magnet is not like a spring, it is instead more like filling a fuel tank of a device that generates a force, under certain conditions and which is therefore subject to the laws of physics. Of course, I agree with the conclusion.
@@teresadepizzol9076 The production of the magnet (input production energy) is not a source of potential (the magnet does no work even when it is stuck on the fridge door dW=F*ds = 0. More is evident from the integral...). The potential (gradient) is visible only after putting in (mechanical) work, for example by pressing two magnets with corresponding poles, which is manifested by a noticeable resistance in the fingers of the hand. A spring behaves in the same way, or a bicycle, which can be set with diamonds, a frame made of rare earths, etc., but the movement is provided only by the mechanical work of the cyclist. It doesn't matter how much we invested in production. These are two things - a tool (magnet, spring, bicycle...), which must be produced with the contribution of some energy (according to the sophistication of the tool), and the use of the tool itself after applying additional force, for example muscle power. No sophisticated tool (not even a magnet) will start by itself. It is still one and the same principle, which many confuse with each other and the ideas of perpetuum mobile arise. It is possible to popularize this principle on other examples - the result will still be the same. The fatigue of the material, or the weakening of the magnetic field, is not about the potential in the gradient, but about the quality of using additional power, for example muscles.
It will not works...You should put a revo exciter to maintain a rotation of the cycle....a starter which is the exciter should properly aligned each rotation.... You only need a minimum waste of energy for exciter to run that engine continuously....Thanks to GOD the source of ENERGY and to me that give you the IDEA on how the free energy works without faking it...FROM PHILIPPINES HERE...Thanks me later.
a basic course in physics is what you need. This "engine" can't work. Magnets in this case are working as springs. you need to push them together before they repell each other, you see the energy that you use to push them together is the energy that you get minus losses. You need not dispise physics, it may actually make you a true inventor
muốn có một nguồn năng lượng vĩnh cửu và kích thước nhỏ gọn trừ khi có thể tạo ra nam châm vĩnh cửu có cực từ bất ổn định cực từ thay đổi chiều liên tục , khi đó ta chỉ cần đặt cuộn dây trông phạm vi từ trường của nam châm vĩnh cửu đó là dòng điện sẽ được sinh ra vĩnh viễn tổng kích thước của nó có thể cải thiện thành những viên pin nhỏ gọn và có năng lượng vĩnh cửu
not can work , for produce electricity , because Felm=Mass*Acceleration , explain me when permanent magnet accellerate ?? decrease or increase magnet forces???....i know ...never therfore also if go not produce power , think idroelectric have water mass and Gravitational accelleration F=M*A , nuclear station have little Mass but big accelleration (when atom start scission very fast reaction you have) F=M*A , permanent magnet not have accelleration
this wont work. you are showing attraction only from one side while the magnets will attract from every side. and one thing when you will transfer that energy there should create a lack of energy on the other side. which will tend to follow the third law of thermodynamics. but you have to show mathematical practical prof and evidence. otherwise, worthless. only works in imagination
L'unica energia che hai creato e quella di sprecare guardare i suoi video. Mi auguro che almeno abbia incrementato il suo conto corrente. Perche se stai cercando di creare energia libera e perpetua, sei ancora lontano e non ha niente a che fare con i magneti. Fai un favore a te stesso , cambia mestiere. Per quanto ti potrebbe portare dei profitti, publicare video simili sarai ricordato come il pagliaccio del circo che non faceva ridere. Se vuoi veramente trovare il modo di sfruttare energia libera studia prima le leggi della gravità. Sarebbe un buon inizio per te
Magnets are used in motors, they don't lose their field. Or just very gradually over centuries, it doesn't matter here. Such magnetic contraptions don't work, this has nothing to do with degradation of the magnets.
10/10 for the graphics! 👍
0/10 for the physics 👎
Totally animation Sir. We and world need original prototype.
I am making a prototype.. I'm working on it. wait
But don't hold your breath ;-)
@@Energygraphy 5 years back i also thought same 👍👍
@@Energygraphy I'm working on the same thing!!!!! I would love to show you my ideas and see if we can make our motors work!!
@@joshuastewart3716 why bother it won't work hello anybody home hello mcfly
Attraction tends to hold or pull both magnets center to center while repulsion tends to resist entry of the other like pole hence. This will not work!
Свойства магнитов говорят об обратном, потери при повороте ------это есть сдвиг ----ровны16% от силы сцепления
Unfortunately, will not work, because The attraction and repulsion force will find a balance position and the system will stop
How long it'll work? More over based on properties of magnetism Coggin and changing of polarity may occur, and stop working.
Maybe I zero gravity and a vacuum 😉
Will flywheel help this out?
This is wrong, the machanical arangements make a balanced position impossible
Using the V8 formation, you may need to add a brace in the center to keep the spinning rods from bending. Otherwise you might have to use rods that are so thick they rob you of efficiency. Of course an extra set of bearings on the rods will also reduce efficiency, but I think not as much.
everytime the pole number increase so do the lock area... so if 1 doesnt work make it 8 will mean 8 new lock area even with properly balanced angle 1 lock will still be there to stop the whole system. the locking is indeed the hardest(where almost all engineer say its imposible)
You need a corresponding magnet or electromagnet at the crank to repel and attract the pistons in conjunction with the timing of the magnets at the top of the piston. It wouldn't hurt to put in a partial gear to assist the crank's rotation where the crank is weak in its rotation: This can also aid in maintaining timing mechanically. If it were me building this, I would use a hybrid magnet and electromagnet setup. I would use the electromagnet as a starter and have it reengage to assist and minimize wear at the helper gears. You can even mount a sensor on the gears to turn the electromagnetic assist into a mechanical and self-sustained timing feature.
There are other designs on RUclips doing precisely as you describe and still producing do additional energy
Estaría bien que usted pudiera montar uno!
Brilliant! This might just be your best design.
Tremendous.
These discoveries are the need of an hour.
If everything is equitative shape/orientation symmetrical, you''ll have same attraction/repulsion vectors of magnetic force. I may be wrong, but i dare to say it wont work. You need an unbalance mechanism to produce movement. I dont see it here. For instance, devices like a magneto-gravitic can takes advantage (like the rotating wheel project where a magnet constant attracts a steel ball and the ball by friction rotates the wheel... its just an example). Here, everything is symmetrical(surfaces, shapes, distances, etc)... So when you think on repulsion/attraction movement, you must think the opposite conterpart.
IT'S GOOD TO SEE SOMEBODY THINK OUTSIDE THE BOX, I'M A OLD GUY
AND I HAVE TO SAY I DON'T SEE IT THAT MUCH ANYMORE.
YOUR IDEA MIGHT MAKE A PERPETUAL MOTION IDEA BUT IT WON'T DO
ANY WORK, BUT KEEP DREAMING
I have same idea of opposite poles. It could be free energy producer. But Great work by you
Try mixing up the magnets driving the megnetic pistons at the ends of each polarity so you have a more gradual flow from one magnetic pole to the next. This may help to reduce put back.
Edit: great design!
Good idea . Is the magnets the same polarity at the bottom stroke? Could you use repelling force at bottom stroke to increase power?
I want one like that for Christmas 👍😉
Em seu modelo sempre faltará um pulso que anule o campo magnético cruzado e que é possível de se fazer com uma bobina que corte o primeiro campo e gere pulso para a segunda e assim por diante!
Si fuera verdad ya se estaría usando hacé 100 años.
Sólo ilusiones.
Free energy is only on animation
Goodbye Gas Engine . Welcome magnetic Motor..
Unless you used it in a complete vacuum with zero gravity, you would need some kind of sleeves to support the pistons which will cause too much friction.
Just made one out of Lego technic in 30 mins. One problem is that the pistons had to be further away from each other so they won’t clog. The main problem is that the crankshaft doesn’t produce enough torque to turn the magnets at the end of the pistons. Doesn’t really work with all gear ratios that I used or what size piston strokes.
Vaya abra cometido usted algún error?
Don't wotk! Any elecromotor is this think :D
This is not going to work. You might get it to turn for a while under no load, until friction stops it, but as soon as you try to draw power out of this system, it will instantly stop. When you want to rotate those round magnets that push the pistons, you‘ll have to invest the energy that the piston produces, because the magnetic field of the piston will resist the rotation
I liked everything my man. I was a young boy 8 and I had this idea and the part I needed was your top 2 bars of magnets. I have a car idea and home power too. Please contact me I'm free for everyone that wants perfection
"Charging" a magnet is equivalent to producing a spring. A magnet does work afterwards if someone has invested work, for example pushing two magnets together with a common pole and then repelling them - that's the returned work from the previous investment of pushing. Likewise, a spring does work if someone pushes or stretches it. Therefore, the magnet (nor the spring) does no work from their production, but from the input work in their finished form. Over time, the magnetism decreases, just as the elasticity of the spring decreases. Production energy (energy supplied during production) is not work potential. It's the same as making a bicycle - it allows you to ride with the energy of your muscles. If the concepts are unified and the meanings are distinguished, you yourself will come to the realization that a perpetual motion machine with pistons is a completely useless waste of your time.
I believe a straight six would be better for what you want straight cylinder engines have less problem then v 8 type motors
Bullshit
This is just a direct power transfer device from the "camshamft" to the "crankshaft".
This mechanism, even if it works, should not be interpreted as a generator...
I have one question this reminds me of a conventional combustion engine will you need a lubricant for the “” piston “” the magnets that move up and down? Won’t it create heat and lock it up if there was not a lubricant?
Cuantos caballos te da este V8.
Genial idea, gracias!
عالی موفقیت های روز افزونت رو آرزومندم
Positive comments give energy and criticizing and opposing comments are informative.
I am not looking for positive opinion, all opinions are respected, we learn together. And we gain experience
I see a huge friction issue here, hence magnetic force is much weaker than an explosion.
Everyone scientists seems to be on free energy, I just need a CNC machine or an EDM
Good effort...
Magnetic repulsion, (between two like poles) to drive a piston, is an idea I would like to see become reality...
LOL the cam is doing a 360 every time piston is at TDC.
I like this idea, and thanks for sharing.
Looks great! Elegant! 🤗
An idea I've thought about for a long time
when small prototype ready or have PDF plans so we can rebuilt it test at home
No motor can work without an energy supply. Every movement has to be compensated for in order for it to be repeated. Experimenters trying to achieve 'perpetual motion' come to realise that. Whether movement is achieved by magnets or gravity or something else you get only one movement as it uses up energy stored in it. Then you have to replace the stored energy to get further movement. Simple!
Movement of anything is caused by energy so there can be no motion without energy being applied or stored energy used up. Sorry, no perpetual machines.
nice computer presentation, but I don't believe it would work in real life
Doesnt work.. driving your own polarity switch is like hanging a swing on your own shoulders and sit on it..
I have recently built a different design magnetic engine using a real throttle and an automatic transmission in a pickup truck. Total completion due in about a month of this posting
عزیزی ... لحجه و قیافه ایرانی داد میزنه
nice concept.....1year make miniscale prototype
Ballaballa... 😂😂😂
I had a rotational one using a bicycle wheel that worked, but only for a couple minutes then would slow down and stop. I think this was due to magnetic flux expanding and I gave up before finding a way to disperse or reuse the excess magnetic flux. I had no way of measuring the flux to verify this though. I am wondering if you experience the same thing?
Nah, it's called friction.
measure flux with iron filings
@@andreasschmitt2307 No, because it accelerated on it's own. I had discovered a different reaction with magnets when you use the side of it next to a pole on the other magnet, it will push it sideways. Try it. It's pretty cool.
Hello Gary,
Do you have a video of it? Is it possible to use magnetic shielding to dissipate the buildup of Flux?
@@danielfeyerabend904 I only tried Ferrite material. It did not help. LOL What I did was this. Take 2 magnets and hold them beside each other. Then rotate 1 90 degrees. You'll feel the magnet want to slide, or push sideways the other one. Line them up along the edge of a bicycle wheel in the same orientation. Then mount the actuating magnet close to the wheel. You will see what I mean. I tried to make the actuating magnet spin like a cam. Pull-slide-push for 180 degree rotation for each magnet on the wheel. For this, every other magnet must be 180 degrees rotated on the wheel. I got a linear plastic gear and mounted it around the wheel and had a pinion gear to spin the actuating gear. That did not do as well as the slide method though. I may revisit it some day. I still have the wheel, but it is stored in the garage and the foam board I used to mount the linear gear is all warped after spending a full day on getting it true round to keep the air gap consistent. LOL UGH!!!!! I could use that as a template still though.
brilliant, hope you succeed...
هذا النمزذج سوف يحقق توازن بين القطبين الشمالي والجنوبي مما يؤدي الى توقف الدوران .لا يمكن تحقيق محرك مغناطيسي دائم الحركة الا بأبتكار مادة عازلة .ابتكار مادة عازلة للمغناطيس سيجعل الطاقة مجانية في العالم واظن ان وجود هكذا مادة منافي لقانون الطبيعة
It wouldn't work. The bottom of the magnets would repel each other and bind up, not allowing a full stroke, which would seize the motion of the stroke.
I'm wondering if an inline 6 configuration might work..? Reason why is all the big diesel engine makers like this configuration due to its efficiency and reliability.
The configuration is irrelevant. Never mind what configuration is chosen, this design does not work. Permanent magnets are not a source of energy and can't drive a motor. In contrast, burning diesel does deliver energy.
Sehr schö, super
Step to step pistion satting
Flywheel to extra satting megnet
So for a second, let’s imagine you spin the crank shaft and it continued on its own. Let’s imagine you’ve solved the issue of friction. How much work could possibly be harvested before it stops?
How long could it possibly sustain just its own rotation? You can forget about harvesting work from it.
Now realize you can’t solve the friction problem. Remember not low friction, zero friction !! And harvest energy from it. You’re animation is a nice design study. But it’s an exercise in CAD, not physics.
Why can’t these be used to create stored energy for a home?
It cant work because the energi is equil 4 magnets push and 4 mag. pulls = no movement
Thy to design it so avery time 6magnet will be pushing the system, and 2 pulling , this must produce some motion.
why then build ITER and so on, if that's the case? I didn't understand anything, but it's very interesting)
try using a bitorroid transformer :): Thane Heins patent.. very unique and promising..
I want to see it in reality
Question: how much energy is used to produce/ charge the magnets? Is the energy produced by the device more or less of the energy neede to charge the magnets?
"Charging" a magnet is equivalent to producing a spring. A magnet does work afterwards if someone has invested work, for example pushing two magnets together with a common pole and then repelling them - that's the returned work from the previous investment of pushing. Likewise, a spring does work if someone pushes or stretches it. Therefore, the magnet (nor the spring) does no work from their production, but from the input work in their finished form. Over time, the magnetism decreases, just as the elasticity of the spring decreases. Production energy (energy supplied during production) is not work potential. It's the same as making a bicycle - it allows you to ride with the energy of your muscles. If the concepts are unified and the meanings are distinguished, you yourself will come to the realization that a perpetual motion machine with pistons is a completely useless waste of your time.
I don't entirely agree. The comparison between a magnet and a bicycle can only hold true as regards the materials used, the assembly of the rare earths. In order to work, the magnet must be subjected to an enormous electric discharge and it is this that gives it its characteristics, which are not unlimited. A magnet is not like a spring, it is instead more like filling a fuel tank of a device that generates a force, under certain conditions and which is therefore subject to the laws of physics. Of course, I agree with the conclusion.
@@teresadepizzol9076 The production of the magnet (input production energy) is not a source of potential (the magnet does no work even when it is stuck on the fridge door dW=F*ds = 0. More is evident from the integral...). The potential (gradient) is visible only after putting in (mechanical) work, for example by pressing two magnets with corresponding poles, which is manifested by a noticeable resistance in the fingers of the hand. A spring behaves in the same way, or a bicycle, which can be set with diamonds, a frame made of rare earths, etc., but the movement is provided only by the mechanical work of the cyclist. It doesn't matter how much we invested in production. These are two things - a tool (magnet, spring, bicycle...), which must be produced with the contribution of some energy (according to the sophistication of the tool), and the use of the tool itself after applying additional force, for example muscle power. No sophisticated tool (not even a magnet) will start by itself. It is still one and the same principle, which many confuse with each other and the ideas of perpetuum mobile arise. It is possible to popularize this principle on other examples - the result will still be the same. The fatigue of the material, or the weakening of the magnetic field, is not about the potential in the gradient, but about the quality of using additional power, for example muscles.
How much watt energy it produces
A nice design and animation. But does not worinkg in real.
Why does it have a piston?
I think it is not useful ..... That magnets can not generate a lot of electricity
Great !
Is it really working
It will not works...You should put a revo exciter to maintain a rotation of the cycle....a starter which is the exciter should properly aligned each rotation.... You only need a minimum waste of energy for exciter to run that engine continuously....Thanks to GOD the source of ENERGY and to me that give you the IDEA on how the free energy works without faking it...FROM PHILIPPINES HERE...Thanks me later.
You've been arrested for violating the law of Conservation of Energy. Better hire a physicist to prove your innocence.
What is the torque?
Do these actually work do you have any functional models
This will not work
but how do you speed it up?
a basic course in physics is what you need. This "engine" can't work. Magnets in this case are working as springs. you need to push them together before they repell each other, you see the energy that you use to push them together is the energy that you get minus losses. You need not dispise physics, it may actually make you a true inventor
muốn có một nguồn năng lượng vĩnh cửu và kích thước nhỏ gọn trừ khi có thể tạo ra nam châm vĩnh cửu có cực từ bất ổn định cực từ thay đổi chiều liên tục , khi đó ta chỉ cần đặt cuộn dây trông phạm vi từ trường của nam châm vĩnh cửu đó là dòng điện sẽ được sinh ra vĩnh viễn tổng kích thước của nó có thể cải thiện thành những viên pin nhỏ gọn và có năng lượng vĩnh cửu
Nice concept. But, this will never work!
Wy only Grafik and no real working engine ?
The best 💙👌
How to get free energy from magnet
good dear
hello , is this modle manufactured ? Or it is a computer movement ?
is magic movement , this violates almost all physics
not can work , for produce electricity , because Felm=Mass*Acceleration , explain me when permanent magnet accellerate ?? decrease or increase magnet forces???....i know ...never therfore also if go not produce power , think idroelectric have water mass and Gravitational accelleration F=M*A , nuclear station have little Mass but big accelleration (when atom start scission very fast reaction you have) F=M*A , permanent magnet not have accelleration
how you stop engine???
he stop alone once get equilibrium , this do not work
this wont work. you are showing attraction only from one side while the magnets will attract from every side. and one thing when you will transfer that energy there should create a lack of energy on the other side. which will tend to follow the third law of thermodynamics. but you have to show mathematical practical prof and evidence. otherwise, worthless. only works in imagination
Very nice idea... new friend...you know what i mean...
Das gibt es schon und wurde auch schon gebaut habe ich schon auf RUclips irgendwo gesehen
If the computer model works then why not build it? ...because it won;t work.
8기통
자력의 원리 ㅎ
What the flux?
Wow
hola, todos tus aportes son sólo teorías? Por qué no haces algo práctico para demostrar lo que piensas?
Vai a studiare la fisica elementare
L'unica energia che hai creato e quella di sprecare guardare i suoi video. Mi auguro che almeno abbia incrementato il suo conto corrente. Perche se stai cercando di creare energia libera e perpetua, sei ancora lontano e non ha niente a che fare con i magneti. Fai un favore a te stesso , cambia mestiere. Per quanto ti potrebbe portare dei profitti, publicare video simili sarai ricordato come il pagliaccio del circo che non faceva ridere. Se vuoi veramente trovare il modo di sfruttare energia libera studia prima le leggi della gravità. Sarebbe un buon inizio per te
👍
Hello
خسته نباشید
Hi there is a very simple way I invited like no ever you have seen
Save your times and ours.
Magnet lose its power gradually by time.
Especially if exposed to opposite magnetic field.
Magnets are used in motors, they don't lose their field. Or just very gradually over centuries, it doesn't matter here. Such magnetic contraptions don't work, this has nothing to do with degradation of the magnets.
Yeah, these magnets will lose their power in 1000 years. Hopefully you'd still around to complain.
Was für ein müll😂
X
How about you come scoop me up and I'll work for free for you.