Bill Gates Talks About the Future of Energy

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 24 мар 2012
  • Bill Gates talks about the future of energy usage and his investments in alternatives to fossil fuels. He speaks with WSJ's Alan Murray at the 2012 ECO:nomics conference.
    Don’t miss a WSJ video, subscribe here: bit.ly/14Q81Xy
    More from the Wall Street Journal:
    Visit WSJ.com: www.wsj.com
    Visit the WSJ Video Center: wsj.com/video
    On Facebook: / videos
    On Twitter: / wsj
    On Snapchat: on.wsj.com/2ratjSM

Комментарии • 508

  • @hrthrhs
    @hrthrhs 4 года назад +17

    This was 8 years ago. If we all just starting constructing nuclear plants back then, by now most of that first wave of plants would have been finished, and most countries would now be generating mostly co2 free, cheap power like France is.

    • @yengsabio5315
      @yengsabio5315 Год назад +1

      It's 10 years ago at this point.
      Here in the Philippines, I've been saying more than a decade back that my country must start investing in nuclear energy. Up to now, I'm still saying it!

  • @jb678901
    @jb678901 10 лет назад +5

    The sad truth is that we already had a GENERATION IV reactor design prototyped at ORNL back in the 1960's and it successfully ran for about 7 years. Too bad Bill doesn't invest in the LFTR, because it avoids the transuranic waste and proliferation issues associated with Uranium/Plutonium Fast Breeders, avoids solid fuel designs (expensive, in efficient), and uses a base fuel (Th-232) which is much more available and can be applied in a low cost, passively safe, lower pressure (near atm) design.

  • @susanrobinson9670
    @susanrobinson9670 Год назад +20

    | CAME HERE TO LEARN HOW TO INVEST AFTER
    LISTENING TO A GUY ON RADIO TALK ABOUT THE
    IMPORTANCE OF INVESTING AND HOW HE MADE
    $460,000 IN 4 MONTHS FROM $160k, SOMEHOW
    THIS VIDEO HAS HELPED SHED LIGHT ON SOME
    THINGS, BUT I'M STILL CONFUSED, I'M A NEWBIE AND
    I'M OPEN TO IDEAS...

    • @ethanmartin7904
      @ethanmartin7904 Год назад

      Investing in stocks or crypto is a good
      idea, a good trading system would put
      you through many days of success.

    • @sebastianrichardson5631
      @sebastianrichardson5631 Год назад

      Most people are scared because of the
      chance of loss incurred while trading

    • @laurenpelletier5379
      @laurenpelletier5379 Год назад

      I'm thinking of investing in the crypto
      market, but I'm taking my time to
      understand how it really works

    • @liambrown2909
      @liambrown2909 Год назад

      It is possible to produce superior
      performance provided you do
      something different from the majority.
      However most of us tend to pay more
      attention to the shiniest position in the
      market to the cost of proper
      diversification.

    • @carlosrobertovega8200
      @carlosrobertovega8200 Год назад

      @@liambrown2909 Exactly, the trick is
      to diversify your investment, don't panic
      when everyone else is and invest
      consistently.

  • @sergioleoz5998
    @sergioleoz5998 3 года назад

    alguien sabe como se llama el título del libro que mencionó sobre autos y casas?

  • @douglasforeman8627
    @douglasforeman8627 Год назад

    Maybe easy code loop estimate # of evergreen pine needles time configuration. Useful BTU return s.

  • @Jim54_
    @Jim54_ 2 года назад +4

    Society’s rejection of Nuclear power was a massive mistake, and the environment has payed dearly for it as we continue to rely on fossil fuels for our electricity

    • @keithfullmer1058
      @keithfullmer1058 Год назад

      Having worked in nuclear industry, in R&D, I have a different opinion. There were problems with the plant designs which small modifications could not address. My opinion is, the US politics and industry momentum, following TMI and even today, would/will not allow the development of new/Gen 4 reactors - reactors that are walk-away safe, address waste storage, and other benefits was/is not happening in the US. Also, even if we had the design it is unlikely it could profitably be licensed and built in the US. For example, the CEO of chevron recently said that it is unlikely we will ever build another oil refinery in the US. Again, my opinion, but I believe that there some possible real benefits to our current condition. It doesn't look like the US will, but other nations are working much harder to design Gen 4 reactors - the US is doing better, but there's still great resistance. The fact that this was years ago but limited progress is significant. I'm hopeful for Gates in Wyoming, but... I'm hopeful we'll see some 'real change'. There are a lot of people working to make it happen.

  • @ravindertalwar553
    @ravindertalwar553 2 года назад

    Yery useful information and discussion in this event.

  • @richard-social8125
    @richard-social8125 2 года назад +2

    his thoughts are so clear

  • @vamseekotha
    @vamseekotha 3 года назад +1

    people might be ranting about how bill gates don't know about lithium batteries , but it is not economic to build batteries. lithium batteries have very limited life and building hydrogen plants is extremely difficult. He did his research and invested billions. Educate yourself people.

  • @dragon90815
    @dragon90815 8 лет назад

    The Tera-Watt Generator should install the Cabling under the Ground for safer distribution,.

  • @cerverg
    @cerverg 10 лет назад +13

    How about Thorium and LFTR ?

    • @samuelforsyth6374
      @samuelforsyth6374 4 года назад

      ruclips.net/video/_ou_xswB2b0/видео.html

    • @samuelforsyth6374
      @samuelforsyth6374 4 года назад

      closest thing to market in us..

    • @hrthrhs
      @hrthrhs 4 года назад

      No need. Uranium is just fine.

    • @cerverg
      @cerverg 4 года назад

      @@hrthrhs Uranium 235 is in very limited supply and it's expensive, creates a lot of pollution to extract. process and enrich. Thorium, on the other hand, is just a waste product of existing rare earth extraction processes and it's 100% Th232 - no need for enrichment

    • @samuelforsyth6374
      @samuelforsyth6374 4 года назад

      @@hrthrhs it is running 'spent' fuel.. the molten salt instead of solid fuel is the gen-v part

  • @Meatchop
    @Meatchop 5 лет назад

    What stops hydro storage in Japan?

  • @joshuatree9037
    @joshuatree9037 10 лет назад +3

    there are more of us than we realize, thank you.

  • @CamburCom
    @CamburCom 5 лет назад +3

    A lot has changed since 2012!

  • @jlnewsonjr
    @jlnewsonjr 8 лет назад +1

    anybody can tell me the name of the book that he mentioned

    • @sergioleoz5998
      @sergioleoz5998 3 года назад

      do yoy know right now what book it was ? i am looking for the title too jaja

  • @Juventinos
    @Juventinos 4 года назад +3

    wood chips.... killing the forest for energy YAY that's the green revolution we all want...

  • @yoice2k
    @yoice2k 11 лет назад

    3:52 teehee he said hard and long.

  • @LaidBackTechTalk
    @LaidBackTechTalk 11 лет назад

    your so right one good deed does not make up for a lifetime of wrongs

  • @ve9jonny
    @ve9jonny 9 лет назад

    He talks very knowledgeably about energy for someone who started out in computing

  • @naimulhaq9626
    @naimulhaq9626 9 лет назад +5

    Bill is honest about how difficult it is for new forms of energy that is cheap and environment friendly.
    50 or 75 years is a good estimate for the future.

    • @kevinkinney737
      @kevinkinney737 8 лет назад

      +Naimul Haq Not when it's has already been developed and ready to be designed into a working application from a portable system, to powering a refit power plant. The difficult part is trying to tell people and getting people like Bill Gates to hear about it. When did Fukushima melt down? I designed a new power system back the to re-power that island nation. I tried the .W.H., Oprah, Al Gore, and so on to interview the project, zip. Mr. Bill Gates many times. zip. They are all set on the course they want and being rich, all of them, look at to future bottom line on their investments, all part of their entertainment. To show a possible risk to investment, is not going to go over well. Hence no reply's. Crazy inventor, me? In case your wondering, no, passionate - driven to get true green abundant energy out in the world today. God Bless, Kevin Kinney

    • @naimulhaq9626
      @naimulhaq9626 8 лет назад

      Kevin Kinney
      The truth cannot be hidden, it will come out. Is it possible to outline your invention of 'abundant energy'?

    • @kevinkinney737
      @kevinkinney737 8 лет назад

      Naimul Haq It's not only possible, but it is easy to do. I could do it, to be so crystal clear, a person who knows a screw driver is a Drink, would get it, so you bet, I could. Thanks for asking.

  • @tsaigillian8838
    @tsaigillian8838 9 лет назад

    windows is long time...some ppl think his product is cheap...so...i dont know bill more..but windows with notbook is nice for media...still use windows..hope he can still give new job ...

  • @oshanerichardson
    @oshanerichardson 10 лет назад +4

    This guy is fucking smart. damn!!

    • @johnnastrom9400
      @johnnastrom9400 10 лет назад

      No.... he is an idiot (and one who got very lucky with his daddy's help). And so are you and idiot for thinking he is smart.

    • @oshanerichardson
      @oshanerichardson 10 лет назад

      It's one for disagreeing with me & giving me your opinion or critixizing mines. But there is no need to call me an idiot. Just like anyone else the foundation off my knowledge starts somewhere.

    • @TheChristianRight09
      @TheChristianRight09 10 лет назад

      John Nastrom I am the daddy,of 7 sons...

    • @johnnastrom9400
      @johnnastrom9400 10 лет назад +1

      TheChristianRight09 And your point is?

  • @keithfullmer1058
    @keithfullmer1058 Год назад

    Thanks, there's a great opportunity.

  • @alessandragomes7499
    @alessandragomes7499 3 года назад

    Qui ótimo.

  • @starsnstrife
    @starsnstrife 10 лет назад

    I think that solar energy, wind energy and tide energy should all be used as a supplement. But not as the main source of our energy.

  • @SHINNBUCKED
    @SHINNBUCKED 5 лет назад +2

    Questions from the audience give great insight into why the world is so messed up.

  • @kimteangchou87
    @kimteangchou87 6 лет назад

    Best team is the team that understand about best market that get alongside of power and respond.

  • @Bosshogg386
    @Bosshogg386 11 лет назад +1

    There hasn't been increased temperatures since 1997.

  • @zinaj9437
    @zinaj9437 6 лет назад

    Sierra Energy! Their concept is FABULOUS!!!!!!!!!

  • @douglasforeman8627
    @douglasforeman8627 Год назад

    Similar to private Doodle briefcase.

  • @dickhamilton3517
    @dickhamilton3517 8 лет назад

    'will' at end of 46th minute: doesn't come through competition, Bill, it comes about because of crisis.

  • @bobo888bobo
    @bobo888bobo 10 лет назад

    It seems to me with the prices for electricity in places like california (0.35 to 0.51 per kwh) for the top residential rates then the payback period for $2/watt solar panels you can buy from amazon is under 6000 hours of use. if you figure 200 x 10 hour days per year, that would be 3 years payback. if if you say you only get half of rated output, that is 6 years. also Solar thermal is very inexpensive for the heat energy produced. It does not seem impractical to me

    • @darwinjina
      @darwinjina 3 года назад

      how long did it take for your solar panels to pay back?

  • @jean-claudeb3235
    @jean-claudeb3235 Год назад +1

    Mr. Eugenics. He's on a mission. For himself - Turn down the sound and watch his body language..

  • @ThanosSofroniou
    @ThanosSofroniou 11 лет назад

    Btw I don't know much about the subject but wikipedia says that after the Fukushima nuclear accident, Germany and Italy will close all their nuclear reactors. The problem with solar from what I know is capturing the energy, storing it and also using it efficiently but there's actually a tremendous amount of it so it's not that solar is not good but we suck on using it. Also there is a list on wiki again on nuclear and it's pretty big...it's not an aircraft accident or something small is nuclear

  • @chris24hdez
    @chris24hdez 4 года назад

    20:09 🤣

  • @jc2k1
    @jc2k1 11 лет назад

    What makes you say that?

  • @HafizBahar
    @HafizBahar 10 лет назад

    do we have the technology to do it currently? and how much would the "lightning power plant" cost

  • @world123cc3
    @world123cc3 5 лет назад

    If anybody ask for me James.,i think you all must ready fund or money in our Faudation WSJ in THAILAND too..TQVM All in the World

  • @ThanosSofroniou
    @ThanosSofroniou 11 лет назад

    So solar, wind and wave energy are not good ways of sustainable energy?

  • @zapfanzapfan
    @zapfanzapfan 7 лет назад +2

    In the spring of 2012 there was about 100 GW installed solar, now it is over 300 GW, so triple in 5 years. Installed wind power in the past 5 years have gone from about 250 GW to 500 GW, so double. CO2 emissions world wide seems to not have grown for the past 3 years. Changes can come faster than we think, I'm cautiously optimistic.

    • @Apjooz
      @Apjooz 6 лет назад +1

      "...I'm cautiously optimistic." Me too. If the biggest wind farm in China gets its planned expansion then it will be the biggest "powerplant" in the world at 20 GW of capacity. These are impressive things. And I think that once we achieve peak fossil fuel demand then many more people will become aware and motivated by it and new goals will be laid out.

  • @ulizez89
    @ulizez89 12 лет назад +7

    When Bill Gates have something to say: you sit down and listen =)

    • @GeoLawson
      @GeoLawson 2 года назад

      everything Gates says about vaccines are LIES!

  • @paulg4621
    @paulg4621 12 лет назад

    good idea。

  • @tompalmer5986
    @tompalmer5986 10 лет назад +6

    One of the most profoundly beneficial things wealthy philanthropists could do for humanity would be to create a billion dollar prize for anyone who can find a cost effective way to desalinate sea water. (By "cost effective" I mean competitive with the watershed in temperate climates. Also, disposal of waste brine would have to be figured in.) Look at how much land would become arable if we had this. They say that water will be more precious than oil in the next century.

  • @RurickTheGreat
    @RurickTheGreat 10 лет назад

    You have to mine thorium while waste uranuim is with us now and avaliable, plus development of thorium reactors, though long-term is a great idea, short term its a money pit that no body really wants to put their money in.

  • @TheSpartanburger
    @TheSpartanburger 10 лет назад

    Jesus Christ that first question could not have gone on longer and been more confusing.

  • @tempersne
    @tempersne 5 лет назад +1

    Lol.. why do you need to reduce carbon? Carbon is plant fuel..

  • @JeremyFisher78
    @JeremyFisher78 11 лет назад

    LFTR Reactors are actually quite small. They don't have those great big cooling towers that Uranium Fast Breed Reactors have to steam cool the chamber.
    We don't have the technology to have powerful and efficient Solar Panels, but there is study into Nantenna and i do support the research into it.
    But LFTR technology exits now, is far more efficient than current Solar Power Technology and has been dismissed for far too long.

  • @bhadreshthummar1367
    @bhadreshthummar1367 4 года назад +2

    The interviewer should learn to listen

  • @antred11
    @antred11 10 лет назад

    Has anyone managed to make thorium reactors economically viable? If this is so safe and easy, why hasn't anyone done it yet?

  • @samurai1999
    @samurai1999 10 лет назад

    If you google 'thorium reactors' you can see the latest developments
    - it looks like there is growing momentum for Thorium around the world!

  • @Bosshogg386
    @Bosshogg386 11 лет назад

    Read about it

  • @Bloated_Tony_Danza
    @Bloated_Tony_Danza 9 лет назад +7

    The comments from the audience were irrelevent and uniteresting.

  • @josephsigelman6599
    @josephsigelman6599 8 лет назад

    He is great as usual!

  • @dekubaner
    @dekubaner 10 лет назад +18

    i fear the guy doing the interview has no clue, minimum background or basic knowledge about energy. gee!

  • @1692shannon
    @1692shannon 11 лет назад

    how much energy is spent on the millions of x box machines every day?

  • @TomCoook
    @TomCoook 11 лет назад

    it was nice show to watch and i think there is a lots of true

  • @bretonkyle
    @bretonkyle 11 лет назад +2

    "his ability to breed woodchucks...."
    lmao

  • @Rayquesto
    @Rayquesto 7 лет назад +4

    "In terms of the first derivative... time rate of change" haha

  • @user-mg5hu7qm2k
    @user-mg5hu7qm2k Год назад

    遇到困難 就像拳擊手出拳擊開問題見隙間走下去

  • @rachelwren-vipond6029
    @rachelwren-vipond6029 7 лет назад

    has he not heard of artificial photosynthesis.dan nocera? et all?

  • @jamesmorton7881
    @jamesmorton7881 Год назад

    50% NEVER.

  • @Nexfero
    @Nexfero 11 лет назад

    did anyone else catch the math reference at 5:40?

  • @douglasforeman8627
    @douglasforeman8627 Год назад

    Miracle. Nice quoter. Just got my work done could be millions of dear. Miracle machine bank.

  • @13publictelevision25
    @13publictelevision25 8 лет назад +1

    Bill gates is a great humanistic person-we need more national leaders like him

  • @artpixie4467
    @artpixie4467 4 года назад +8

    this guy has an answer for everything, energy, vaccines, technology(5g) tesla had put together the use of free energy and we/re following these muppets dc

    • @dr.mimibee2895
      @dr.mimibee2895 3 года назад +3

      Ikr.... they're hanging on to every word like he is god... not. This guy bill gates has a nefarious agenda.

    • @Mrbfgray
      @Mrbfgray 2 года назад

      A lot of what he says is laughable, literally funny.

  • @jcauc1464
    @jcauc1464 7 лет назад +8

    Extremely successful and intelligent man who has a good grip on the impossibility of "farmed energy" versus "intense energy production" that is needed. I can not see the propagation of his vision for nuclear energy (plutonium "bomb" producing reactors) into the 3rd world (Somalia, Iran, Iraq, Syria, North Korea as just a few, all need electricity) as being successful. Has he even heard any arguments for a Thorium reactor that produces no bomb material, and in actual fact destroys those materials? Come on Bill, let someone spend 5 minutes with you to explain the process where your vast wealth would be better used!

    • @Brainbuster
      @Brainbuster 7 лет назад +5

      In the _decades_ of of using "bomb" producing reactors, as you rudely mocked them, has there been even one instance of using the plutonium to make a bomb?
      No.
      I agree that thorium reactors are better than old-fashioned reactors,
      but Gates here was referring to 3rd generation breeder reactors, which are FAR better and far safer than the reactors that caused upset.
      As Gates rightly stated in the video, many more people die from coal and wind than from nuclear, per energy unit produced; yet the public still has a phobia around nuclear energy.

    • @robertweekes5783
      @robertweekes5783 7 лет назад +2

      Totally agree !! How does Bill G not understand the amazing potential of thorium molten salt reactors ?? He knows about them, how would he not take a day to immerse himself in the research? Drip info to Bill (and other influential people) on Twitter ;)

    • @chapter4travels
      @chapter4travels 7 лет назад +2

      He must have been reading your comment because he has started investing in MSR's as well. Also to be clear thorium is just one type of fuel for a molten salt reactor, the reactor design is the important part, not necessarily the fuel.

    • @chwest31
      @chwest31 7 лет назад +1

      THANK YOU for making this statement. I agree totally. I also want to thank you for allowing me to not have to watch bill gates blather on about something he doesn't know enough about but we listen because he was on the computer wave at the right time. He's just as smart as most of us.

  • @myztic123
    @myztic123 10 лет назад

    wow the questions at the end are absolutely awful.

  • @douglasforeman8627
    @douglasforeman8627 Год назад

    What is possible. Steady pace preface numbers. Original reinventing fire. Return on BTU s. The father here might imagine. Terrawatts. Connasuor not quite the word.
    What happening others not so aware creation also participants.

  • @mrme8795
    @mrme8795 7 лет назад

    is he talking about thorium riacter

  • @arthurzettel6618
    @arthurzettel6618 2 года назад

    One day there will be Wireless electricity. When this happens there will be no more electricity bills.

  • @SeijuroRen
    @SeijuroRen 5 лет назад

    We should rename high pressure nuclear contained nuclear.

  • @MrKorrazonCold
    @MrKorrazonCold 11 лет назад

    "Bill, we have a hugh energy problem!
    The work for energy compression or contraction. Electrical potential comes from light+waves from surrounding masses (Faradays Law) compressing the wave+amplitude the shorter the oscillating wave-lengths the greater the mass or energy!
    From surrounding masses compressing gas and oil to atoms from active cores of galaxies because Mach's Principle "All inertial ref-frames determind by the composite matter of the universe is the Basis of Einsteins relativity."

  • @daydreamer5580
    @daydreamer5580 4 года назад

    I like this but he says 'the entire history of the planet'. Problem is we DON'T KNOW what the 'entire history' of the planet is. We just have emotional people and need more rational team players.

  • @alisonmez6713
    @alisonmez6713 2 года назад +1

    Awesome amazing beautiful people amazing beautiful places ❤

  • @jacknisen
    @jacknisen 4 года назад

    Carbon capture is a total waste of time.

  • @CalebMcFarland
    @CalebMcFarland 5 лет назад

    Hey, not too far from that 2022 timeline.

  • @physicsimpossible73
    @physicsimpossible73 10 лет назад +1

    How on earth did Bill actually understand half them questions?!?!

    • @ganymede242
      @ganymede242 10 лет назад +11

      He is incredibly clever. When you consider that this isn't even his main area of interest and he is involved in so many other projects - his depth of knowledge is incredibly impressive.

    • @jawelNeezeker
      @jawelNeezeker 5 лет назад

      He has alot of knowledge. He said in an interview that he reads a few books a months and always takes notes of what he's reading.

  • @navylaks2
    @navylaks2 10 лет назад

    electrolyses when producing power thus storing oxygen and hydrogen and fuelcells when you need it, way better than batteries

  • @douglasforeman8627
    @douglasforeman8627 Год назад

    Good luck Landshark Boss. shares.?

  • @paulwarren796
    @paulwarren796 4 года назад

    IS THERE ROOM FOR THE CALIBUR OF FRIENDSHIP ?

  • @ferencdurczi6425
    @ferencdurczi6425 4 года назад

    Gazember!

  • @highwaykill98
    @highwaykill98 10 лет назад

    in my thoughts nuclear energy has one flaw where will you get the uranium 235 once it runs out , uranium 235 by itself is already toxic to bio material. so my idea wich is safer and less expensive is too harness the power of the atmosphere by taking the power from lighting and recycle it in a reactor using atoms to keep the energy in a flux in my theory. okay now your A's and Q's
    Question 1: How would you get the lighting into a proper containment
    Answer 1 ; All lighting is attracted to

  • @user-ii2wm7lg8b
    @user-ii2wm7lg8b 2 месяца назад

    ❤❤❤❤

  • @ThrallsBoys
    @ThrallsBoys 11 лет назад

    He's to honest

  • @nonchalantd
    @nonchalantd 11 лет назад

    Why can't the plants just be put in some deserted place?

  • @aldosalthren
    @aldosalthren 11 лет назад

    this video is clearly above your level of comprehension

  • @douglasforeman8627
    @douglasforeman8627 Год назад

    Maybe advice too moderator of discussion. Do you have you work done existing have good and problematic. What are we talking about from existing.

  • @juancarlossande1360
    @juancarlossande1360 3 года назад

    Quiero hablar con usted de economía xD

  • @buckeye200175
    @buckeye200175 3 года назад

    No energy no development

  • @jacknisen
    @jacknisen 4 года назад

    Gates is wrong about the 10,000 year life of carbon thing. Atmospheric atomic tests have shown that the lifetime of excess atmospheric carbon is about 20 years.

  • @tylerfinkable
    @tylerfinkable 10 лет назад

    Look at organic produce. If its not in demand then its not a commodity obviously... And the land that is required for natural resources is far less then the land that is required by the industrial agricultural ind. Nuclear is safe and efficient but what does our future generations do with the waste (i.e. 1000 years later, if we haven't killed our environment past living conditions by then.)
    It is not practical to your comforts but that is all based off the "social norms" which you follow

  • @NegateYourMind
    @NegateYourMind 11 лет назад

    Buddy I have read about it. Ofcourse there has been increased temperatures. I live in california and this weekend it was 110 degrees. What the hell are you talking about lol.

  • @user-mg5hu7qm2k
    @user-mg5hu7qm2k Год назад

    果南韓中和和電廠十分之一大小造價約二十五億 大量生產造價十六億是可能 如配合法令如接到五千座 那是八千億的單

  • @etbadaboum
    @etbadaboum 12 лет назад +2

    Forget Amory Lovins and other fairy tall tellers, read Vaclav Smil!

  • @erikm9768
    @erikm9768 9 лет назад

    Hes adamant , as he was when he proposed that no one will ever need more than 10kb memory.

  • @joshuatree9037
    @joshuatree9037 10 лет назад

    your not doing your research on solar and storage cells as well as wind power and hydro power. The whole earth is solar powered, if you use the same amount of space to put solar panels rather than a nuclear plant but would power a fairly large city.

  • @billgates7361
    @billgates7361 12 лет назад

    ITS TRUE!

  • @samurai1999
    @samurai1999 11 лет назад

    What about Thorium, Bill?

  • @stephencurry5728
    @stephencurry5728 10 лет назад

    The output may be at Tesla cars.Nobody wants to live in a world similar to the Planet Venus. Very good reply Friend.

  • @ClarksonsinUSA
    @ClarksonsinUSA 12 лет назад

    What does one do with nuclear waste that is deadly for longer than mankind has recorded history...????