Never trust a ticket scalper, especially when they’re holding a handful of tickets. That right there is a huge red flag because what kind of a person can afford to buy that many tickets to resell cheaper.
@harpert579 the fact that they tried to have this guy pay for their trip was ridiculous and should've lost them the case. Greedy. The gambled on tickets and lost. The Defendant explained how his business works. The agent holding his tickets for in person sales was stealing from him & he remedied that and even offered to reimburse. The Plaintiff should've lost.
plaintiffs are aa bunch of idiots... I see ppl outsideconcerts trying to sell tickets and they ALWAYS look sketchy .... they shouldnt of got the $200... Judge also needs to chill with the hormones... she was bias from the begining
The plaintiffs say they went there to watch the game, but if that were their main objective they should have bought tickets in advance instead of risking that they’d get some illegally.
@@teacupmagick7030 That’s how I feel. It’s his fault for not following up with the company He hired. So then he tries to make it right and offers them they’re $200 back but They said No and demanded another $400 dollars. They told the Judge they asked him for $600 and he said no. So they emailed Yankee Company and asked for him to be punished or fired! So now he’s Pissed. Then they take him to court for $3000! 😮 I would be SO F 🤬 ing mad! The defendant bringing the attitude to court though….didn’t help him how he looks on National tv but at least he just says to pay the original $200 and unfortunately the court costs. Which I don’t agree with that one but 🤷🏾♀️
@@asherialeeyeah, that blew my mind too. The plaintiffs filed this lawsuit knowing the fact that the ticket guy tried to make it right and they refused. I could understand if the ticket guy changed his mind after he made the initial offer and they filed the lawsuit to force him to adhere, but the plaintiffs were the ones who refused. They should not have gotten their court costs covered in this case.
He sounded like a weirdo. "I want him to be punished," bro chill 😂 get your $200 back and go about your business. That entitlement stuff is off-putting. You gambled and lost.
A few years ago I went to the UGA vs Notre Dame football game and scalped a ticket. Before I paid for the ticket I asked the guy to call me on the phone while I stood next to him, he did. Then I said, I want a picture of you and me holding the ticket, he did. Tickets turned out to be good. With scalpers you never know. I now used electronic tickets that are guaranteed.
@@alyssahamlett I made him show me his ID after all that but didn't take a pic. Like I said, he he had of flinched at all I was out, but I was just making sure he was real. But I don't buy scalped tickets anymore, do it online through legit companies. That was old school.
Seems like the ticket guy was the one scammed. Lost $200 for someone he leased work to. Don’t even see why they tried to paint him in a bad light when he offered the money back before ever getting sued. They really thought they were going to get a free trip. Even when the victim people still have to be dishonest
because he shouldn't be giving hardy copy tickets to someone to sell and sell online. At no point should too lots of tickets be in circulation at the same time. Regardless is once he sells online he tells them to shred them, what if legitimately they get sold by the time they well online. The ticket seller out selling the real ones, isn't going to ring him and say hey, I sold ticket xyz just now after every ticket. His excuse is bogus. Its fraud
Everybody knows when you're buying tickets on the street is a possibility that you're going to be scammed and they're not real you try to be greedy to get more money out of the man and it's call karma
Yeah...I think those two are giant pieces of shit. They had no problems buying the tickets from a scalper. It was only when it hurt them they felt this urge for "justice". Furthermore they felt real good about talking all kinds of trash about this man, and trying to destroy his business...they felt real bad about not profiting from this whole situation....cause that would have been justice somehow? Big Babies.
So plaintiff broke the law by buying the tickets on the street from a scalper and then wants all of his costs back. Judge should have noticed this and given him zero dollars.
I agree, I hgappen to think those two are giant pieces of shit. They had no problems buying the tickets from a scalper. It was only when it hurt them they felt this strong urge for "justice". They felt real good about talking all kinds of trash about this man, and trying to destroy his business...they felt real bad about not profiting from this whole situation....cause that would have been justice somehow? Giant pieces of excrement
Honestly, I dont think the Plaintiffs should have gotten anything. I mean who travels to a different state for a ballgame like that and chooses to buy their tickets on the street instead of online or directly from an authorized broker? Buying tickets off the street is like buying a watch off the street. Its a massive risk...and if it doesn't work out, I don't think you can just sue.
Defendant is annoying, but he did offer the money back for the tickets and the plaintiffs should have taken it. If they didn't come with the tickets beforehand, they were already expecting to spend money on food and a hotel. They weren't mislead down to NY.
I'm on the ticket man's side on this one! Ridiculous for the plaintiffs to try to make a payday out of this, and by the way, they attacked the wrong guy.
The reason why "his industry has a bad name" is not because of a few bad apples; They make money by "buying on consignment" (which means they don't pay anything until it sells) making those tickets more expensive. Then your business makes profit off of selling tickets for events that you otherwise have nothing to do with. That's a dirty business that just drives up the cost of tickets. What value does this "industry" provide?
The defendant is part of the problem with concert tix & other tix being so expensive. He's part of the cause of 90% of the up front seats costing 5x, 10x, 20x the face value of the ticket. He's part of the cause of Ticket-Bastard's "dynamic pricing" and "platinum seating" tix.
The defendant definitely knew he was double selling those tickets. But everyone knows buying tickets on the street is going to be some sort of scam. It's like trying to sue your drug dealer
Maybe I'm naive, but why should he pay back when they brought the tickets on the street nit through a company. Judge, that decision was wrong. A game that cost $150 and they knew on the street would have been cheaper. They, too, are dishonest
The people on the street were through a third party company that the defendant contracted to sell the tickets for him, which is why the defendant is responsible.
Actually he doesn’t know that this is the case. He worked with them, however he mentioned they could be copied and the person that sold them worked for themselves. He just knows he used them. That’s why he said he will use them again because he doesn’t know how those tickets got out.
The thing that stuck the fault with him is how he admitted he sold those tickets already online and he’s the only way they still got sent physically to the stadium after. If he didn’t say that he would be off the hook
I'm surprised that the plaintiff's got any money back for the simple fact that I thought it's against the law to buy or scalp tickets. They bought the tickets off the street, and that's the risk you take when making street/ hood deals. I believe the defendant wasn't trying to scam them and wasn't even the guy they bought them from.
I'm curious what the outcome would have been if they just asked for travel and hotel and didn't stack their meals and booze on it. Seems like JM was falling that way but bailed on the idea. Weird that they would come all that way just to buy from a scalper.
@@amandastandley9403this, yes. Everything else, no. There is no proof that they went there SOLELY for the game, because if they did, then they should have secured their tickets prior to traveling. To do anything else it to take a risk.
Plaintiffs are 100% ridiculous & greedy as hell. You bought tickets on the street & then try to defame the defendant with the Yankees FOR YOUR IDIOTIC DECISION?
The defendant is full of BS. He's actively purchasing tickets for resale. At face value? He's not making a dime? He's a legal scalper, and part of the problem he says he's so angry about. He was careless and should've been punished with additional damages to the plaintiff.
@@not_thedroids871 He's obtaining tickets legally and having a broker do his dirty work. It's greasy. Bet he gets more than face value from the broker, but he's not making the sale. Technically legal, but slimy and very much part of the problem he claims to be against. So what's your point?
Happy Friday from the UK!!! I hope that you have an excellent weekend. The weather in The UK is now quite hot. I am looking forward to watching this case.
This is such a joke. The defendant is 100% right. He didn’t sell those tickets to them. They need to go after the broker. And the plaintiff asking for all their food and drinks and hotel? What am I watching?
The defendant rectified the situation by offering them $200, but they wanted to be greedy. They wasted everybody's time just for the judgment to have the same outcome.
The defendant sent those tickets to his agent in NY to be sold. Then he preceeded to sell the same tickets online. After he sold them, he did not inform his agent in NY that he had sold those tickets. His agent sold the tickets. So the tickets were sold twice because he did not inform his agent that the tickets had been sold.
In the hall one of the plaintiffs they sued because they traveled all the way down from Boston to see their team win but they never got that opportunity. Even if the tickets were good they wouldn’t have gotten that opportunity because their team lost!😂😂😂😂
So, those boogers thought he should pay for the entire trip they were taking anyway? If they wanted a guarantee they should have bought the tickets BEFORE driving down.
so the defendant sent a bunch of tickets to his agents in NY while at the same time selling the same tickets on-line. Well that sure ain't asking for trouble.
The plaintiffs were trying to be greedy, they went to the game with no tickets and might very well have not been able to buy any tickets outside the game at all, so all those initial expenses and meals were going to be on them anyway. But buying tickets from a ticket scalper is risky and they were lucky they were able to track down the defendant, but there is nothing that says the scalper was HIS worker, so they are lucky to have been awarded $200...
This one is simple. The plaintiffs did not come to court with clean hands. They did a illegal transaction and 5 tickets from a scalper, which is illegal. Therefore, they have no legal recours. Because they did an illegal action. It's a real, simple case five seconds
This isn't scalping 😂 but regardless in 43 states anyone can sell tickets to anyone. In 7 states (NY included) the person reselling needs a license, which in this case it sounds the defendant uses a reseller company.
There is no federal law on the resell of tickets(scalping). There are only a couple of states that have made it illegal (special license needed) As of May 2022, ticket scalping is illegal in seven US states: Alabama, Georgia, Illinois, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, and Pennsylvania.
A scalper charging below face value for tickets, I would run the other way if they were selling them at half price. At 4:18 they say they paid $50 each for tickets with the face value of $110. Maybe it is just that in Australia scalpers only sell tickets for games that have already been sold out and that makes me to expect a scalper to sell at inflated prices.
No offense Judge Milan, but JJ would not have given the plaintiffs anything due to the theory of "clean hands". They bought those tickets knowingly from the black market (is what we call them in Bharat) and hence they themselves did not have clean hands. Thanks to JJ I have gotten a very good lesson on whats legal and whats not. 😊
I'm embarrassed the plaintiffs are from Boston. They certainly were not the best representation. They were super entitled and tried to score a bonanza because of poor planning and poor decision-making. I agree, the defendant should have better business practices in place to ensure this doesn't happen in the future. But he tried to resolve the mistake and only refused to reimburse them because of their greed. I also find it hilarious they only went the cheap route when it came to the tickets but were pretty extravagant when it came to every other part of their trip🙄
Wow! Ticket scalpers have always been shady... i knew that when I was a little girl going to watch the Kansas City A's... ha ha! That's a long time ago!
$3K for baseball game Bought on the streets.. holy hannah..have yet to see the video..but one thing I does know.. stupid is as stupid does! AND they paid a whopping $ 50 per ticket for a $1000 ticket scalpers scamming
I am surprised the judge was so rude to the ticket guy, who IMO was not obnoxious at all. And she is %100 wrong that the guy who sold the tickets is his "agent". Her awarding any money to these dopey plaintiffs who bought tickets from some random person is simply wrong. And why didn't they just go buy other tickets? This is stupid. The defendant didn't get the $200 and did no fraud.
Huh? Why would the plaintiffs get their court costs back? The defendant offered to give them the full amount they were owed ($200), but the plaintiffs admittingly wanted more than they were owed. This case never had to have been filed. This case was filed because the plaintiffs wanted to make a windfall. This judge is just like Judge Judy: if she likes you better, her judgment will reflect that. 😮 This should be based on the facts. AND they wanted the defendant to pay for their dinners BEFORE they even thought to buy those tickets from a scalper.
I don’t understand how the plaintiffs are unsatisfied with the verdict. They got the $200 they were out for buying the tickets. Why would they think that they are entitled to their personal expenses when they were already there for the game minus tickets. Just go to the box office next time.
because the defended had the same tickets being sold at the same time, which is fraud and they wanted him to lose out as punishment, but he really didn't lose because he had already sold the tickets.
If the sports organizations made it so that as soon as a legitimate ticket is printed it is a completed sale and can no longer be "Sold online" too. Just like a lottery ticket, the specific seat number could be logged in the main computer showing it as sold and then no further paperwork could be produced to sell the ticket on any other median. But the sports organizations don't do that because it would cut into the scalper business. It's almost like they are complacent with the scalpers whom they claim to want to stop.
You try to purchase tickets from a scalper, and you take the chance they are fake. They obviously didn't go just for the game otherwise they would have purchased proper tickets. ... Plain and simple!!!
Mail the physical tickets to your agent, then (someone legitimately) sells the soft version...then you are definitely responsible to ensure the physical tickets are destroyed and not resold. I see nothing wrong with trying to get last minute tickets. Obs if your entire trip is based on this one game you should plan ahead.
The defendant sent those tickets to his agent in NY to be sold. Then he preceeded to sell the same tickets online. After he sold them, he did not inform his agent in NY that he had sold those tickets. His agent sold the tickets. So the tickets were sold twice because he did not inform his agent that the tickets had been sold.
The defendant was 100% correct! the Plaintiffs bought the tickets ON THE STREET! not from the ticket co. They know what happens from the the street tickets... Judge was wrong.
The defendant sent those tickets to his agent in NY to be sold. Then he preceeded to sell the same tickets online. After he sold them, he did not inform his agent in NY that he had sold those tickets. His agent sold the tickets. So the tickets were sold twice because he did not inform his agent that the tickets had been sold.
Scalping tickets should be illegal imo, same with reselling new merchandise like they do with ps5s and all the other system releases. It hurts everyone except the scalpers.
Plaintiffs are annoying brats. They came to get their entire trip paid off, but tried to mask like they’re avenging all the people who gets screwed over by scalpers. Defendant was annoying too.
Plantiff should have just accepted the money and learned from the mistake. Instead wasted time in court to "make a point" Its a point that many would be already aware of and several stadiums have warnings and such to literally not do that exact thing of buying from street vendor. If you are travelling specifically for a sporting event make sure you have electronic tickets before your travel.
So these are a group of guys who went to NY, stayed at an hotel, bought food for over $800.00, spent over $300.00 in drinks...& then these 4 clowns made a conscious decision to buy tickets from a scalper off the street in New York. I mean, really? And what is amazing is that not one of these guys were smart enough to tell the others that they should buy the tickets online in advance or go to an official ticket office & but proper tickets. All they are showing is how dumb they are. Even the pigeons flying about in NY know better than to buy a ticket off scalpers. I am sure that if the defendant wasnt so annoying that this case would have been thrown out.
They were all obnoxious, but especially the plaintiffs. They could’ve just as easily gone to visit New York City, which is its own destination, rather than for the baseball game. And what would’ve happened if they couldn’t find any tickets? The same result. They would’ve spent all that money on eating and drinking and sightseeing without having gone to the game. Their claim only makes sense if they travel to some tiny little town in the Midwest or something.
Never trust a ticket scalper, especially when they’re holding a handful of tickets. That right there is a huge red flag because what kind of a person can afford to buy that many tickets to resell cheaper.
The Plaintiffs were cornballs. You buy tickets on the street, then feign surprise because they were fake. Really?
That’s exactly what I was thinking 🤷🏾♂️
And they were trying to prevent this from happening to other baseball fans. Yeah right.
@harpert579 the fact that they tried to have this guy pay for their trip was ridiculous and should've lost them the case. Greedy. The gambled on tickets and lost. The Defendant explained how his business works. The agent holding his tickets for in person sales was stealing from him & he remedied that and even offered to reimburse. The Plaintiff should've lost.
@@panamafernandez4641 Yes I agree
plaintiffs are aa bunch of idiots... I see ppl outsideconcerts trying to sell tickets and they ALWAYS look sketchy .... they shouldnt of got the $200... Judge also needs to chill with the hormones... she was bias from the begining
The plaintiffs say they went there to watch the game, but if that were their main objective they should have bought tickets in advance instead of risking that they’d get some illegally.
Watching this on my lunch break. Hello everyone.
Hi !
👋 🌞
Hope you enjoyed your lunch break!!!😊
Hey, lunch-breaker!
TGIF!!
The defendant is cocky, arrogant and VERY annoying AF!
Maybe but he shouldn't be responsible for tickets he didn't even sell.
That's what she said
@@sashaqueenieExcept he is because he is the one who employed the third party contract to sell his tickets.
@@teacupmagick7030 That’s how I feel. It’s his fault for not following up with the company He hired.
So then he tries to make it right and offers them they’re $200 back but They said No and demanded another $400 dollars. They told the Judge they asked him for $600 and he said no.
So they emailed Yankee Company and asked for him to be punished or fired!
So now he’s Pissed.
Then they take him to court for $3000! 😮
I would be SO F 🤬 ing mad!
The defendant bringing the attitude to court though….didn’t help him how he looks on National tv but at least he just says to pay the original $200 and unfortunately the court costs.
Which I don’t agree with that one but 🤷🏾♀️
@@asherialeeyeah, that blew my mind too. The plaintiffs filed this lawsuit knowing the fact that the ticket guy tried to make it right and they refused. I could understand if the ticket guy changed his mind after he made the initial offer and they filed the lawsuit to force him to adhere, but the plaintiffs were the ones who refused. They should not have gotten their court costs covered in this case.
The men got ripped off, but they showed up without tickets in hopes of getting some hot tickets.
Defendant is obnoxious but the plaintiffs were too especially in the exit interview
I enjoyed Douglas's reaction during the post interview though. LOL
He sounded like a weirdo. "I want him to be punished," bro chill 😂 get your $200 back and go about your business. That entitlement stuff is off-putting. You gambled and lost.
A few years ago I went to the UGA vs Notre Dame football game and scalped a ticket. Before I paid for the ticket I asked the guy to call me on the phone while I stood next to him, he did. Then I said, I want a picture of you and me holding the ticket, he did. Tickets turned out to be good. With scalpers you never know. I now used electronic tickets that are guaranteed.
I mean a pic isn't gunna stop him from scamming and he can use a burner phone..I'd ask 4 id-harder to fake
@@alyssahamlett I made him show me his ID after all that but didn't take a pic. Like I said, he he had of flinched at all I was out, but I was just making sure he was real. But I don't buy scalped tickets anymore, do it online through legit companies. That was old school.
Seems like the ticket guy was the one scammed. Lost $200 for someone he leased work to. Don’t even see why they tried to paint him in a bad light when he offered the money back before ever getting sued. They really thought they were going to get a free trip. Even when the victim people still have to be dishonest
Could be, or it could also be he is in on the scam. There is no proof except his own word and his way of speaking makes him look shady af.
because he shouldn't be giving hardy copy tickets to someone to sell and sell online. At no point should too lots of tickets be in circulation at the same time. Regardless is once he sells online he tells them to shred them, what if legitimately they get sold by the time they well online. The ticket seller out selling the real ones, isn't going to ring him and say hey, I sold ticket xyz just now after every ticket. His excuse is bogus. Its fraud
Everybody knows when you're buying tickets on the street is a possibility that you're going to be scammed and they're not real you try to be greedy to get more money out of the man and it's call karma
Yeah...I think those two are giant pieces of shit. They had no problems buying the tickets from a scalper. It was only when it hurt them they felt this urge for "justice". Furthermore they felt real good about talking all kinds of trash about this man, and trying to destroy his business...they felt real bad about not profiting from this whole situation....cause that would have been justice somehow? Big Babies.
Not when you are not used to being scalped, dude.
@@trekgirl65 😂😂😂
Plaintiffs tried to get greedy. They were scammed and got their money back. They wanted a payday tho
I agree with you
So plaintiff broke the law by buying the tickets on the street from a scalper and then wants all of his costs back. Judge should have noticed this and given him zero dollars.
I agree, I hgappen to think those two are giant pieces of shit. They had no problems buying the tickets from a scalper. It was only when it hurt them they felt this strong urge for "justice". They felt real good about talking all kinds of trash about this man, and trying to destroy his business...they felt real bad about not profiting from this whole situation....cause that would have been justice somehow? Giant pieces of excrement
It's not illegal to buy resale tickets. It's illegal to resell them for more than face value.
Honestly, I dont think the Plaintiffs should have gotten anything. I mean who travels to a different state for a ballgame like that and chooses to buy their tickets on the street instead of online or directly from an authorized broker? Buying tickets off the street is like buying a watch off the street. Its a massive risk...and if it doesn't work out, I don't think you can just sue.
but that doesn't then excuse fraud. Its a bit like saying because you forgot to lock your car, the thief who stole it did nothing wrong
Defendant is annoying, but he did offer the money back for the tickets and the plaintiffs should have taken it. If they didn't come with the tickets beforehand, they were already expecting to spend money on food and a hotel. They weren't mislead down to NY.
they did it to gt on TV to highlight these scams that go on. They stated that
I'm on the ticket man's side on this one! Ridiculous for the plaintiffs to try to make a payday out of this, and by the way, they attacked the wrong guy.
It seems like the defendant is a victim of the same scam.
They explained they did it to get on TV to highlight what is happening, particularly with him.
The reason why "his industry has a bad name" is not because of a few bad apples; They make money by "buying on consignment" (which means they don't pay anything until it sells) making those tickets more expensive. Then your business makes profit off of selling tickets for events that you otherwise have nothing to do with. That's a dirty business that just drives up the cost of tickets. What value does this "industry" provide?
I'd like to know how many tickets were "reissued online" after being mailed to NY on Thursday ...
The defendant is part of the problem with concert tix & other tix being so expensive. He's part of the cause of 90% of the up front seats costing 5x, 10x, 20x the face value of the ticket. He's part of the cause of Ticket-Bastard's "dynamic pricing" and "platinum seating" tix.
Me too at lunch. Happy Friday all
sports people amaze me on how childish they are.
Cause men do sports, kids watch it
no different from gaming fans or music fans or car fans etc. all are childish
The defendant definitely knew he was double selling those tickets. But everyone knows buying tickets on the street is going to be some sort of scam. It's like trying to sue your drug dealer
no because buying drugs and possessing drugs is illegal, buying and possessing tickets is not
Maybe I'm naive, but why should he pay back when they brought the tickets on the street nit through a company. Judge, that decision was wrong. A game that cost $150 and they knew on the street would have been cheaper. They, too, are dishonest
The people on the street were through a third party company that the defendant contracted to sell the tickets for him, which is why the defendant is responsible.
Actually he doesn’t know that this is the case. He worked with them, however he mentioned they could be copied and the person that sold them worked for themselves.
He just knows he used them. That’s why he said he will use them again because he doesn’t know how those tickets got out.
The thing that stuck the fault with him is how he admitted he sold those tickets already online and he’s the only way they still got sent physically to the stadium after. If he didn’t say that he would be off the hook
Weird how 2 of the plaintiffs are in matching outfits!
Suits? Most all suits look alike. Us men don't have variety like women's clothes.
It seems like the defendant sold the tickets online, and then the hard copy of the tickets were sent to N.Y. to be sold.
Excuses Said he doesn't know who did,but then says " I'm not working with that company ever again " So he thinks he knows who did it.
That defendant is a jerk.. but honestly thats what those guys get for buying tickets on the street and not planning properly.
I’m with the defendant on this one.
I'm surprised that the plaintiff's got any money back for the simple fact that I thought it's against the law to buy or scalp tickets. They bought the tickets off the street, and that's the risk you take when making street/ hood deals. I believe the defendant wasn't trying to scam them and wasn't even the guy they bought them from.
NEVER buy tickets by the Fly By Your Pants...ALWAYS BUY LEGIT TICKETS. DEFENDANT KNOOOOOOWS EXACTLY WHAT HAPPENS "ON THE STREETS"😂😂😂😂
The judge made a good point .. why didn't they go out and buy from a legitimate broker. They could have still seen the game.
I'm curious what the outcome would have been if they just asked for travel and hotel and didn't stack their meals and booze on it. Seems like JM was falling that way but bailed on the idea. Weird that they would come all that way just to buy from a scalper.
Or at least their parking at the venue.
@@amandastandley9403this, yes. Everything else, no. There is no proof that they went there SOLELY for the game, because if they did, then they should have secured their tickets prior to traveling. To do anything else it to take a risk.
Plaintiffs are 100% ridiculous & greedy as hell. You bought tickets on the street & then try to defame the defendant with the Yankees FOR YOUR IDIOTIC DECISION?
The defendant is full of BS. He's actively purchasing tickets for resale. At face value? He's not making a dime? He's a legal scalper, and part of the problem he says he's so angry about. He was careless and should've been punished with additional damages to the plaintiff.
Keyword : LEGAL
@@not_thedroids871 He's obtaining tickets legally and having a broker do his dirty work. It's greasy. Bet he gets more than face value from the broker, but he's not making the sale. Technically legal, but slimy and very much part of the problem he claims to be against.
So what's your point?
If you get tickets below or above the actual price of the ticket it is scalping and is illegal.
It's only illegal in some states.
He sound ridiculous paying for his drinks, and food !! Get out of here with all that
If Steve Carell ever has a bio movie the defendant would be spot on to portray him.
Lmao 😂😂
Who goes to a game to buy tickets on the street. That's just dumb.
The guy is such a beety eyed weezel LOL
*beady
He meant beety...as in vegetable.
"He had red, vegetable eyes."
Happy Friday everyone! We made it! 😩🥳
HAPPY FRIDAY !! 🌞
😂 ikr
Happy Friday from the UK!!!
I hope that you have an excellent weekend. The weather in The UK is now quite hot.
I am looking forward to watching this case.
I work all weekend. This is my tuesday
@@TopherGrant oh no good luck !
I would never buy tickets off the streets. How do you know they’re real ?
Boston you’re my home !!! ❤
This is such a joke. The defendant is 100% right. He didn’t sell those tickets to them. They need to go after the broker. And the plaintiff asking for all their food and drinks and hotel? What am I watching?
The defendant rectified the situation by offering them $200, but they wanted to be greedy. They wasted everybody's time just for the judgment to have the same outcome.
wrong dude.
The defendant sent those tickets to his agent in NY to be sold. Then he preceeded to sell the same tickets online. After he sold them, he did not inform his agent in NY that he had sold those tickets. His agent sold the tickets. So the tickets were sold twice because he did not inform his agent that the tickets had been sold.
If defendant offered to make it right and pay, and plaintiffs refused, they should not be awarded the court cost!
So after they couldn’t get in they went and spent a lot of money on food and wanted to get paid for it? Talk about greedy
Plaintiffs are ridiculous. .....
The defendant's voice makes my skin crawl and head hurt....
why does almost everyone who sues for defamation either not understand what it is AT ALL, or always be suing for "possible future defamation" 😂
How about don't buy tickets on the streets
In the hall one of the plaintiffs they sued because they traveled all the way down from Boston to see their team win but they never got that opportunity. Even if the tickets were good they wouldn’t have gotten that opportunity because their team lost!😂😂😂😂
So, those boogers thought he should pay for the entire trip they were taking anyway? If they wanted a guarantee they should have bought the tickets BEFORE driving down.
so the defendant sent a bunch of tickets to his agents in NY while at the same time selling the same tickets on-line.
Well that sure ain't asking for trouble.
All involved wasted the courts time
This one made my headache.
They shouldn't get court costs because they acknowledged the defendant offered to pay them. They just wanted to be greedy.
Take a photo of the ID of the guy selling you the tickets. How hard would that have been?
The plaintiffs were trying to be greedy, they went to the game with no tickets and might very well have not been able to buy any tickets outside the game at all, so all those initial expenses and meals were going to be on them anyway. But buying tickets from a ticket scalper is risky and they were lucky they were able to track down the defendant, but there is nothing that says the scalper was HIS worker, so they are lucky to have been awarded $200...
Plaintiffs shouldn’t have gotten court costs. They were offered the refund and rejected it. They went to court for nothing.
You can't give a ticket to someone to sell and then void and resell it to someone via email. That's fraud.
This one is simple. The plaintiffs did not come to court with clean hands. They did a illegal transaction and 5 tickets from a scalper, which is illegal. Therefore, they have no legal recours. Because they did an illegal action. It's a real, simple case five seconds
Was it? 😂
If you buy tickets under face value, is it actually scalping?
Agreed. The Plaintiffs hands are dirty as well Judge Judy...smile
This isn't scalping 😂 but regardless in 43 states anyone can sell tickets to anyone. In 7 states (NY included) the person reselling needs a license, which in this case it sounds the defendant uses a reseller company.
How can you claim they had no legal recourse when they were awarded a refund of the tickets? I call that a legal recourse...
The agent is on the hook.
I love NY… never been there
There is no federal law on the resell of tickets(scalping). There are only a couple of states that have made it illegal (special license needed)
As of May 2022, ticket scalping is illegal in seven US states:
Alabama, Georgia, Illinois, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, and Pennsylvania.
A scalper charging below face value for tickets, I would run the other way if they were selling them at half price. At 4:18 they say they paid $50 each for tickets with the face value of $110. Maybe it is just that in Australia scalpers only sell tickets for games that have already been sold out and that makes me to expect a scalper to sell at inflated prices.
It's the case of "Inserto lawsuit here". 😂
No offense Judge Milan, but JJ would not have given the plaintiffs anything due to the theory of "clean hands". They bought those tickets knowingly from the black market (is what we call them in Bharat) and hence they themselves did not have clean hands. Thanks to JJ I have gotten a very good lesson on whats legal and whats not. 😊
I'm embarrassed the plaintiffs are from Boston. They certainly were not the best representation. They were super entitled and tried to score a bonanza because of poor planning and poor decision-making. I agree, the defendant should have better business practices in place to ensure this doesn't happen in the future. But he tried to resolve the mistake and only refused to reimburse them because of their greed. I also find it hilarious they only went the cheap route when it came to the tickets but were pretty extravagant when it came to every other part of their trip🙄
What is the Defendant writing down?
Wow! Ticket scalpers have always been shady... i knew that when I was a little girl going to watch the Kansas City A's... ha ha!
That's a long time ago!
$3K for baseball game Bought on the streets.. holy hannah..have yet to see the video..but one thing I does know.. stupid is as stupid does! AND they paid a whopping $ 50 per ticket for a $1000 ticket scalpers scamming
I am surprised the judge was so rude to the ticket guy, who IMO was not obnoxious at all. And she is %100 wrong that the guy who sold the tickets is his "agent". Her awarding any money to these dopey plaintiffs who bought tickets from some random person is simply wrong. And why didn't they just go buy other tickets? This is stupid. The defendant didn't get the $200 and did no fraud.
Flim-flam goes the defenant man.
Huh? Why would the plaintiffs get their court costs back? The defendant offered to give them the full amount they were owed ($200), but the plaintiffs admittingly wanted more than they were owed. This case never had to have been filed. This case was filed because the plaintiffs wanted to make a windfall. This judge is just like Judge Judy: if she likes you better, her judgment will reflect that. 😮 This should be based on the facts. AND they wanted the defendant to pay for their dinners BEFORE they even thought to buy those tickets from a scalper.
I don’t understand how the plaintiffs are unsatisfied with the verdict. They got the $200 they were out for buying the tickets. Why would they think that they are entitled to their personal expenses when they were already there for the game minus tickets. Just go to the box office next time.
because the defended had the same tickets being sold at the same time, which is fraud and they wanted him to lose out as punishment, but he really didn't lose because he had already sold the tickets.
If the sports organizations made it so that as soon as a legitimate ticket is printed it is a completed sale and can no longer be "Sold online" too. Just like a lottery ticket, the specific seat number could be logged in the main computer showing it as sold and then no further paperwork could be produced to sell the ticket on any other median. But the sports organizations don't do that because it would cut into the scalper business. It's almost like they are complacent with the scalpers whom they claim to want to stop.
In the ticketing industry at most you'll only get back the ticket cost if anything
I bet the defendant was someone that got picked on in school
The defendant may have his bases covered ha ha but he's slippery for sure
New Laws are being considered to make it illegal to resell a ticket
abvoe the face value. European Countries are already doing this.
You try to purchase tickets from a scalper, and you take the chance they are fake.
They obviously didn't go just for the game otherwise they would have purchased proper tickets. ...
Plain and simple!!!
The defendant is sleazy.
I don’t think I would have awarded the plaintiffs their court cost when the defendant tried to pay them their $200 and they wouldn’t take it.
I think they should have gotten travel costs too.
Mail the physical tickets to your agent, then (someone legitimately) sells the soft version...then you are definitely responsible to ensure the physical tickets are destroyed and not resold. I see nothing wrong with trying to get last minute tickets. Obs if your entire trip is based on this one game you should plan ahead.
This judge is crazy!!!! Scammers are at work!
She doesn’t have the ⚾️⚾️reply to comments!
Plaintiffs dd NOT buy the tickets from an authorised dealer. They didn't deserve no compensation.
The defendant sent those tickets to his agent in NY to be sold. Then he preceeded to sell the same tickets online. After he sold them, he did not inform his agent in NY that he had sold those tickets. His agent sold the tickets. So the tickets were sold twice because he did not inform his agent that the tickets had been sold.
The defendant was 100% correct! the Plaintiffs bought the tickets ON THE STREET! not from the ticket co. They know what happens from the the street tickets... Judge was wrong.
The defendant sent those tickets to his agent in NY to be sold. Then he preceeded to sell the same tickets online. After he sold them, he did not inform his agent in NY that he had sold those tickets. His agent sold the tickets. So the tickets were sold twice because he did not inform his agent that the tickets had been sold.
Scalping tickets should be illegal imo, same with reselling new merchandise like they do with ps5s and all the other system releases. It hurts everyone except the scalpers.
Wonder if Doug walked the defendant to his car afterwards.
Plaintiffs are annoying brats. They came to get their entire trip paid off, but tried to mask like they’re avenging all the people who gets screwed over by scalpers. Defendant was annoying too.
Plantiff should have just accepted the money and learned from the mistake. Instead wasted time in court to "make a point" Its a point that many would be already aware of and several stadiums have warnings and such to literally not do that exact thing of buying from street vendor.
If you are travelling specifically for a sporting event make sure you have electronic tickets before your travel.
Obnoxious sports fans, especially NY/Boston baseball. Shocking 😂
Dear plaintiffs: whaaaat?????
lol read the title and thought this was about a dodgy haircut 😅
Mistake one - pay even a penny to watch sportsball.
The defendant is annoying as heck.
So these are a group of guys who went to NY, stayed at an hotel, bought food for over $800.00, spent over $300.00 in drinks...& then these 4 clowns made a conscious decision to buy tickets from a scalper off the street in New York. I mean, really?
And what is amazing is that not one of these guys were smart enough to tell the others that they should buy the tickets online in advance or go to an official ticket office & but proper tickets.
All they are showing is how dumb they are. Even the pigeons flying about in NY know better than to buy a ticket off scalpers. I am sure that if the defendant wasnt so annoying that this case would have been thrown out.
Oh come on he should’ve got more than $200 I think you should get at least $600 for his trouble
The ticket guy is a jerk !!
They were all obnoxious, but especially the plaintiffs.
They could’ve just as easily gone to visit New York City, which is its own destination, rather than for the baseball game.
And what would’ve happened if they couldn’t find any tickets? The same result. They would’ve spent all that money on eating and drinking and sightseeing without having gone to the game.
Their claim only makes sense if they travel to some tiny little town in the Midwest or something.
Defendant is a SCAMMER‼️
They didn't buy it from him