I hate how people can just “own” wrecks like Lucy’s. It’s not only a gravesite for many people but also a war crime by both sides and therefore should be a protected site like titanic is and not something owner like a piece of property.
Lusitania was indeed carrying munitions on her final voyage, as we have documentation as well as physical evidence that she was. In fact, at the end of the section where I discuss the munitions theory, you can see some of the 4,200 cases of Remington .303 rifle rounds that was documented in the cargo manifest for her final crossing. The conspiracy lies in the belief that these munitions detonating are the cause of the secondary explosion, which can be easily disproven based on events that occurred during the sinking and also information obtained from expeditions to the wreck.
I’m glad I was able to help out with this. As always, you’ve nailed it, mang.
I think the second explosion was a steam pipeline that exploded.
I hate how people can just “own” wrecks like Lucy’s. It’s not only a gravesite for many people but also a war crime by both sides and therefore should be a protected site like titanic is and not something owner like a piece of property.
from what Ive heard/read I think there is quite a bit of evidence or at least acceptance she was carrying war supplies
Lusitania was indeed carrying munitions on her final voyage, as we have documentation as well as physical evidence that she was. In fact, at the end of the section where I discuss the munitions theory, you can see some of the 4,200 cases of Remington .303 rifle rounds that was documented in the cargo manifest for her final crossing. The conspiracy lies in the belief that these munitions detonating are the cause of the secondary explosion, which can be easily disproven based on events that occurred during the sinking and also information obtained from expeditions to the wreck.
*promosm*