VW Id.7 BATTLE - 77 kWh vs 86 kWh
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 7 окт 2024
- A better route planner:
abetterroutepl...
& Charge:
and-charge.com...
Tronity:
app.tronity.io...
Maingau Autostrom:
www.maingau-en...
matthias-lang-...
My German RUclips Channel:
/ @batterylifede
Become a member for exclusive and early content and behind the
scene info:
/ @batterylife
Merch is out as well:
batterylife.my...
If you want to support the Channel
/ batterylifeev
paypal.me/batte...
@volkswagen #volkswagen #vw #id7 #ProS #big #battery #pro #versus
#abrp #abetterrouteplanner #tronity #maingau #autostrom
My music in my videos is available at Epidemic sound
Referral link:
www.epidemicso...
Links to my spreadsheets of the cars tested:
Charge Curve Comparison
docs.google.co...
Charging Curve
docs.google.co...
EV Consumption
docs.google.co...
Take care - Авто/Мото
Are the tires the same? Brand, preassure, wear, all matters a lot. The weight should hardly make any difference at all constant speed.
Weight difference between pro and pro s is 60kg from the specs for same model id7. This would change nothing.
Tire pressure is very important!!!
2 weeks with the 77kwh tourer match pro. Easiliy getting 4.5 in town in b mode. Munching up the m/way in mixed conditions at 75 -80, 3.2 ish. Great car, stop obsessing over the range, it's a great all round car.
Wh/km?
The tourer has a different backside so the aerodynamics are different too, it's not just the weight.
Was there ever a comparison between 19” wheels and 20” non-sport tires? I like those more on ID.7 and wondering how much worse would those be 🙏
ID7 Pro S or Polestar 4 LRSM? I can't decide!
Very interesting results. How much more expensive is the S with the bigger battery?
starting price is about 2k more
Depends on the country/market.
Germany ripoff with +5000 EUR
There is one other variable in the equation that you seem to forget, the cars don't have the same colour, are we sure this doesn't have an impact on the consumption?
😇
Anyhow, nice comparison. Keep up the good work.
I hope the major lack in ID software (for me) is solved when I order this car next year (I want to be capable of adjusting charging current from app, like in my model 3 today)
DC?
While I appreciate the effort, I respectfully disagree with the conclusions in this video. If I understand correctly, you first conducted a test comparing 19-inch vs 20-inch wheels on the sedan. Then, in a follow-up video, you compared the sedan to the touring model, but since the touring had 20-inch wheels, you deducted the previously calculated percentage increase from the sedan test to estimate how much higher the consumption was for the touring. Now, in this video, you're comparing the touring with a larger battery to the sedan with the smaller battery. However, you still use previous consumption increases to calculate the impact of the larger battery.
Correct me if I’m wrong, but I think this approach involves too many indirect comparisons, making it difficult to isolate the true impact of the larger battery on consumption. Additionally, weight has minimal impact at constant cruising speeds, so the focus on the larger battery's weight may be overstated.
He says at the start of the video that both cars have 19" summer tyres.
@@earleyriser1967 i see. My bad, but my point still stands.
Yes, I find all three tests interesting but I think extrapolating the result in this way is probably not valid at the levels of precision shown. That 1.6% difference for the Tourer is probably not accurate.
I think a fair conclusion would probably be that the bigger battery, the Tourer shape and the bigger tyres will all have some influence on consumption but the first two less than 5%. The aero difference should be more significant on the motorway and the weight difference in stop start traffic.
Agree, i don't think the 1.6% difference between Cd 0.23 and 0.25 AT 130km/h is accurate.
Yeah the aerodynamic difference is going to have a magnitude greater impact than the small weight increase from a bigger battery.
fantastic comparison!