The Most Controversial Watch Ever Made | Watchfinder & Co.

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 13 авг 2019
  • What should have been a momentous day for Bremont, the launch of both a watch with an actual piece of the Wright brothers’ Wright Flyer and the brand’s first in-house movement, turned sour after it was revealed that the calibre BWC/01 was not, after all, in-house. This is the story of how the Wright Flyer became the most controversial watch ever, and what that means not just for Bremont, but for the industry as well.
    Featured Watches:
    Bremont Wright Flyer WF SS
    We know you want more watches…. click here: linktr.ee/watchfinder
    Shop now for Bremont watches:
    www.watchfinder.com/Bremont/w...
    Watchfinder is the number one place to buy, sell and exchange premium pre-owned timepieces. Discover more exceptional watches at www.watchfinder.com
  • ХоббиХобби

Комментарии • 470

  • @watchfinder
    @watchfinder  8 месяцев назад

    We know you want more watches…. click here: linktr.ee/watchfinder

  • @-JohnGalt-
    @-JohnGalt- 4 года назад +207

    Not a huge Bremont fan, but I do love the rotor on this watch. The incorporation of the Wright Flyer fragment is a neat touch.

    • @udin737
      @udin737 4 года назад +4

      Agree on that.

    • @hcmvitor
      @hcmvitor 4 года назад +2

      Their rotor game is usually on great

    • @DJ_POOP_IT_OUT_FEAT_LIL_WiiWii
      @DJ_POOP_IT_OUT_FEAT_LIL_WiiWii 3 года назад

      what if it is a scam likethe movmnt?

    • @gyang333
      @gyang333 3 года назад +1

      And charging a $10k premium for that piece of cloth.

    • @broyout3586
      @broyout3586 Год назад

      @@gyang333 To be honest, that doesn't even seem too excessive. It's a nice design, classy and understated. If I'm ever in the position to extend my lowly watch collection to higher end bs marketing watches, this will surely be on the list :-)

  • @Dave062YT
    @Dave062YT 4 года назад +26

    It's mind-boggling that 66 years after the Wright brothers man was walking on the moon .20th century was a remarkable one in every way

  • @aknonnerd
    @aknonnerd 4 года назад +305

    I swear you guys could make a video about a store brand block of cheese mesmerizing.

  • @Jazzbeau
    @Jazzbeau 4 года назад +30

    "...better best not peel back too many layers...." Love it.

  • @Andreas23OK
    @Andreas23OK 4 года назад +65

    At 4:40 Watchfinder once again proves they are the best at closeups!

    • @cchristie6092
      @cchristie6092 4 года назад +4

      Andreas23OK Actually second to Horology House.
      If you watch these videos on any type of HD screen, they are not really close.

    • @brettkendrick1
      @brettkendrick1 4 года назад +3

      I like the way it blurred too.👍

    • @TucsonDude
      @TucsonDude 4 года назад +7

      That refocus thru the jewel was amazing!

  • @dagsabot5589
    @dagsabot5589 4 года назад +64

    This is obviously an Out house movement.

  • @1AlphaCrux
    @1AlphaCrux 4 года назад +3

    This must be the best watch related channel in RUclips. Thanks for the stories you bring to us!

  • @karlmadsen3179
    @karlmadsen3179 4 года назад +6

    I thought I saw one of those Bremont fellows hanging from the ceiling of the Smithsonian with a knife, taking shavings from the craft. More daring than the featured watch.

  • @davidshaw5979
    @davidshaw5979 4 года назад +7

    Awesome imagery , very well narrated and a must see every Wednesday and Friday.

  • @Tigrt6150
    @Tigrt6150 4 года назад +14

    Lovely and very informative video as always especially for an unknown brand (at least to me).
    Please review the titanium/platinum limited edition AP with blue on grey dial from 2017 🙏🏻

  • @mudpieconspiracy
    @mudpieconspiracy 4 года назад +16

    That is a beautiful watch nevertheless. I am thankful to Japanese watchmaker's to allow people like me to buy and collect automatic watches without spending an arm and a leg.

  • @dimman77
    @dimman77 4 года назад +10

    The base LaJoux Perret is also not fully original. It's based on a Valjoux and the chronograph removed. LJP puts their own bidirectional winding setup in the leftover space. The De-chronographed Valjoux is quite a popular base for other "in-house" movements. Habring2, Demasko, are two notables.
    The Valjoux 'tells' are the zig-zag jewel train, and the pair of uncentered screws on the ratchet wheel.

    • @mrfuriouser
      @mrfuriouser 4 года назад

      Great info, will be looking into this some more, thanks!

    • @goldendawn7
      @goldendawn7 4 года назад +1

      Soprod does this too for certain panerais, but in that instance Panerai is at least honest about it! But theres only so many ways to make gears and springs tell time, and theres no point in reinventing the wheel. The nomos alpha is based off (and by based i mean they ape the design since the patent expired) a pesaux 7001 for instance. The argument could be made they dont really charge in house money for it, even though they manufacture it.

    • @dimman77
      @dimman77 4 года назад

      @@goldendawn7 Yeah, the 7001 is another favourite of LJP. The 90h PR ultrathins available in Arnold and Son, Baume et Mercier, and Hublot are all 7001 bases with an extra barrel. LJP also reorganized the 7001 components into a tonneau shape with offset small seconds. It's an interesting business when you cut through the marketing ... stretching... the truth.

  • @simonhellier7281
    @simonhellier7281 4 года назад +16

    I like the brand, and the aspiration, the pricing isn’t right, but it’s not a volume brand, and it’s tough to climb down to where 2nd hand prices are.
    I wear a Solo everyday as I like its simplicity, and I want an MBII and I have more time for Nick and Giles approach than Rolex’s tricks to limit supply,

  • @varunadesilva2930
    @varunadesilva2930 4 года назад +1

    Superb commentary. Interesting watch n the history warped into it, could listen to you all day.

  • @NateTrucker92
    @NateTrucker92 4 года назад +7

    I don't care what any "purist" says....that could be a Sea Gull movement as far as I'm concerned....The fact it has a piece of the Wright Flyer in the rotor is absolutely amazing and an Arnold&Son movement is beyond outstanding in my book. I don't care what company owns who or who actually put the thing together, this thing is a serious slice of HISTORY!

    • @GradyPhilpott
      @GradyPhilpott 4 года назад

      You need to do some research on where that piece of fabric came from. It is relatively safe to say that it belonged to the Wright family, but beyond that, there are a lot of questions.

    • @NateTrucker92
      @NateTrucker92 4 года назад +1

      @@GradyPhilpott all research I conducted stated it came from a bottom portion of the wing with the consent of the Wright family. I'd like to be shown otherwise.

  • @cedarcanoe
    @cedarcanoe 4 года назад +12

    A Bremont doesn’t make my heart beat faster. Certainly not at that price tag..

  • @ronjenkins4257
    @ronjenkins4257 4 года назад +23

    "In-house" seems to me an odd criterion for evaluating watches. Quality can be assessed independently of that.

    • @thegougy
      @thegougy 4 года назад +2

      Quality for sure, the Heritage not ;D

    • @alexandermarquardt597
      @alexandermarquardt597 4 года назад +1

      Its not about the quality, its about the lying.

    • @mohamedabdelhakim4785
      @mohamedabdelhakim4785 4 года назад +1

      @@alexandermarquardt597 Everybody is lying , car companies , PC companies , medicine companies ...and we don't know it , until something reveals that .
      So take it easy , It is a beautiful watch , and if that is real Wright airplane bits , then it is worth it, if true

    • @jamestouchette859
      @jamestouchette859 3 года назад +2

      I might have missed the point, but... on what basis DID Bremont make the "in-house" claim?
      In-house isn't a water tight test of quality, certainly, but for desirability, it shows a watch maker's commitment to the art and craft. There's a gentleman in my town that makes wooden pendulum clocks (hand-carved wooden gears, handmade granite weights, etc) and charges over 5,000 for each piece. The gears, on moderately close inspection, are very clearly hand carved with very inconsistent tooth profile and depth and I'm sure it's not exactly "chronometer" spec, but what it IS is a beautiful piece of art in it's own right. 5 grand is a bit much in my opinion, but I would love to buy one of his clocks because he made it all himself and I get to inspect and see the evidence of his hard work and passion in each little inaccuracy and flaw. :)

    • @gyang333
      @gyang333 3 года назад +1

      @@jamestouchette859 the press release they sent out claimed it was in-house. And had it on the website that it's in-house. They were caught cold-handed with the lie.

  • @Mububban23
    @Mububban23 4 года назад +2

    4:39 - love the timing and the camerawork on that "blurred" jewel shot :-)

  • @AudunDragland
    @AudunDragland 4 года назад +17

    Panerai PAM 318 Special Edition "Brooklyn Bridge". Is that perhaps even a bigger scandal?

    • @gyang333
      @gyang333 4 года назад +5

      Audun Dragland it's probably worse because of reach and brand damage due to Panerai being a bigger company. But one company dropped in a base movement behind a sealed caseback and the other company out-right lied about their product.

  • @mrgrey91
    @mrgrey91 4 года назад +4

    Love it as always! I‘d love to see a video covering the watches of Philippe Dufour! This man is a living legend.

  • @materialdefender2351
    @materialdefender2351 4 года назад +4

    I swear, not only is this my favorite RUclips channel, but I could listen to you read the phone book.

  • @1Aevum
    @1Aevum 4 года назад +13

    Worst then the Brooklyn Bridge debacle ?

  • @HJ-bd2rr
    @HJ-bd2rr 4 года назад

    As always, great video. Very elegantly explained!

  • @smokeybear69
    @smokeybear69 4 года назад +10

    Really like that watch. And that shot through the ruby.... bravo. 👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻

  • @737speedster
    @737speedster 4 года назад +135

    A "hair under £18,000" for a Bremont? Er, no. No Thank you.

    • @anonymousonlineuser6543
      @anonymousonlineuser6543 4 года назад +9

      but it has in-house mvmnt.....!

    • @scottishdroneservices
      @scottishdroneservices 4 года назад +28

      @@anonymousonlineuser6543 I had a movement in the house this morning - not sure it has any value 😄

    • @thegougy
      @thegougy 4 года назад +2

      @Alysandir " An in-house movement is just the latest fad for people to justify why their watch is "better."" well, your opinion, for WISs it is different and no matter if the inhouse is Seiko, Myota, ETA or Patek, it is just the fact that the manufacturer is able to produce movement.

  • @inkitatus1
    @inkitatus1 4 года назад +6

    Can't say the whole "in house" thing bothers me one way or another, quality is quality whoever makes it! Sweet watch, love the idea of a part of the Wright flyer in it. Cheers 👍👍

  • @garethwesleyevans
    @garethwesleyevans 4 года назад +16

    I find it quite distasteful to be cutting up history like that to just place a small fragment in a watch. How much canvas did they acquire? How and where from?

    • @Thankz4sharing
      @Thankz4sharing 4 года назад +2

      Indeed. If one is paying for the provenance of a bit of fabric, then it must be reliably proven.

    • @friendlychat34
      @friendlychat34 4 года назад +1

      Agreed, I think it's tacky

    • @lordilluminati5836
      @lordilluminati5836 3 года назад +3

      I know this is a year-old comment but I'm here to clarify:
      the wright brothers themselves had to repair their airplane due to it taking damage before sending it to the museum. Orville stored the original damaged parts that had to be replaced.
      eventually, those damaged parts of the flyer entered the market, and bremont bought them.
      so no, nobody 'cut up' the flyer to make these watches

  • @benweiss5862
    @benweiss5862 4 года назад +1

    The horizontal propeller on the crown when fully screwed down is a nice touch. Other brands should take note!
    Great video Watchfinder!

  • @bravececil4147
    @bravececil4147 4 года назад +11

    Cut-off numerals is instant no for me..

  • @Astragoth2
    @Astragoth2 4 года назад +2

    Exellent. Informative and entertaining.

  • @PhilipBeresford
    @PhilipBeresford 4 года назад +1

    Great vid. You could do a similar story about the Panerai 318 Brooklyn Bridge limited edition

  • @niallvbrennan6629
    @niallvbrennan6629 4 года назад

    Interesting story,wonderfully told and elabore-ated☘

  • @Stigstigster
    @Stigstigster 4 года назад +7

    "and so when the watch community at large discovered that Bremont had called it 'in house', well...They went apeshit."

  • @karlmadsen3179
    @karlmadsen3179 4 года назад +7

    My "ETA inside" watch is an accuracy monster! I don't know how much more accurate I could expect a watch to be, short of atomic accuracy.

    • @ElementsMMA
      @ElementsMMA 4 года назад +2

      Toyotas are more reliable than Bugattis. Perhaps there is more to the mechanics of a watch than just its accuracy. However I agree etas do seem to keep more accurate time over the life of the movement than any other.

    • @friendlychat34
      @friendlychat34 4 года назад +1

      Errr how about literally any quartz

  • @ganrimmonim
    @ganrimmonim 4 года назад +2

    I'm never going to be able to afford a watch like this, but I really like the styling of the hands. It's quirky without being totally out there and having an actual piece of the White Brothers plane as part of the watch is amazing. And as high end watches go. It's a good price.

  • @BvsMAcosh
    @BvsMAcosh 4 года назад +8

    When you can't add real value, bring the bling!

  • @angryagain68
    @angryagain68 4 года назад +1

    I thought it was a Vostok K-43 Classic on the thumbnail. They sell for around $110

  • @skilso
    @skilso 4 года назад +2

    The voice of breathy boy is pure affectation. It grates on my sensibilities but it seems fitting to recount the mock heroic story of those English boys. And of course it complements the monumental folly and pretence of the watch perfectly.

  • @lordleonusa
    @lordleonusa 4 года назад

    Excellent Video

  • @udin737
    @udin737 4 года назад +21

    Please review BALL watches. I am quite intrigue by their design. They will be introducing in house movements with 80 hours power reserve and 80k anti magnet I think.

    • @vincentturner-jacobs2898
      @vincentturner-jacobs2898 4 года назад +1

      udin737 and using 904l steel like Rolex

    • @matthewhoover6154
      @matthewhoover6154 4 года назад +1

      I like their watches with the luminescent tubes

    • @vincentturner-jacobs2898
      @vincentturner-jacobs2898 4 года назад +1

      Check out the Ball Engineer Pioneer lll. 40mm, 904l steel, 100 metre water resistance, sapphire crystal, 1000 Gauss and all for £1700. Blood6 good bargain I’d say

    • @ElementsMMA
      @ElementsMMA 4 года назад

      They’re tough understated watches worth anyone’s time however I personally don’t feel Ball bring anything much to the table at their price point. I would talk some one out of buying an Oris in favour of a Ball but that’s about it.

    • @NoShame86
      @NoShame86 4 года назад

      ray h. Watchfinder has a video on Ball Engineer II Diver, can’t recall the exact title of the video

  • @bonesshed.
    @bonesshed. 4 года назад

    Is there clarification that the section of muslin in the watch is from the aircraft that flew that day ? or as I remember reading somewhere, its a piece that had been previously fitted to the AC before the first flight ?

  • @yetidh9
    @yetidh9 4 года назад +3

    They should have called it a 'town house' movement.

  • @dominicrusho
    @dominicrusho 4 года назад +2

    Watchfinder: please, what is the music in this video! I've been looking for years!

    • @gmshadowtraders
      @gmshadowtraders 4 года назад

      And you will continue looking for it for years! Lol

  • @G-Confalonieri
    @G-Confalonieri 4 года назад +2

    For £18,000 that piece of cloth must be the shroud of Turin.

  • @TruckeeDoggo
    @TruckeeDoggo 2 года назад +3

    It’s been two years since this video, and eight years since the Wright Flyer debacle, and Bremont has still not recovered. Their disasterous Hodinkee damage control interview where they feigned ignorance at what “in-house” meant, was the inspiration for Prince Andrew’s similarly disasterous “I can’t sweat” interview years later

  • @matthewscott3689
    @matthewscott3689 4 года назад +5

    That’s a beautiful watch! Overpriced definitely, but it looks great. Amazing video quality and photography too, as always :)

  • @malcolmc5964
    @malcolmc5964 4 года назад +11

    £18000, if the bought in movement cost £5000+ it maybe worth it, if more likely it cost less than a £1000 then it is a rip-off, unless the Wright flyer fragmment cost thousands.

    • @dimman77
      @dimman77 4 года назад +4

      That LJP movement is probably in the $500 USD range.

    • @przemyslawskoczylas5183
      @przemyslawskoczylas5183 4 года назад +2

      Wright flyer fragment? Bargain? It reminds me of these salesmen that try to sell u the tap water for 100s claiming it from holy place and very powerful. If economy bursts again like in 2008, this thing will be selling for 10th of its price

  • @solstar4778
    @solstar4778 4 года назад

    Where in the USA can you purchase one? And how much 💲❓

  • @MrRoyck10
    @MrRoyck10 4 года назад +3

    Bremont have a shop next door to Watchfinder at the Royal Exchange luxury shopping mall at St Paul London, is this a well executed sinister plan by Watchfinder? Personally I would not buy Bremont at such price point when there are brands with better heritage and craftsmanship.

  • @RennLeiterR34
    @RennLeiterR34 4 года назад

    Anyone know the name of the background music?

  • @mathieuvaillancourt3219
    @mathieuvaillancourt3219 4 года назад

    On the watchfinder site Bremont's watches are around 3-4 k but the one in the video is almost 13k. Is it because it's a limited edition?

  • @markstarmer3677
    @markstarmer3677 Год назад +2

    I don’t mind Bremont, they do make some outstanding watches no doubt.
    This one looks superb, especially with the fragment of the original Wright bros plane.
    This makes it a very unique piece indeed. Arguably a better buy at around £18k than a gold Omega or Brietling say ?

  • @shaverray4462
    @shaverray4462 4 года назад +6

    I really want to like Bremont, but it’s a struggle. What they’ve achieved in a relatively short time is very impressive. And it would be great to see a British watchmaker making a serious mark on the horological world stage. But somehow there seems to be something a bit too smooth, too glib, about the way they market themselves and their pieces. The brand seems a bit contrived, as do some of their watches, and the ‘in house’ movement debacle was obviously a blow to their credibility. Anyway, cracking video, as usual.

    • @broyout3586
      @broyout3586 Год назад +1

      Agreed, I got the exact same impression (after reviewing their uberslick website). It's all a bit too perfect and too made up. What they lack in heritage, they make up for in marketing bs. However, I can appreciate a well thought out concept, and this is very well thought out. I really like their designs and execution as well. It's almost a parody of high end Swiss watch making, but the prices are a bit too meaty for it to be a joke. For now I'll keep to my seagulls and seikos, an asian parody of sorts themselves :)

  • @IvoMoAn
    @IvoMoAn 4 года назад

    What do you think of the Rolex Yacht-Master 40 with a grey dial?

  • @Ron_A._Bolton
    @Ron_A._Bolton 4 года назад +1

    Love the rotor.

  • @ARlELATOM
    @ARlELATOM 4 года назад +4

    Am I the only one who think it’s a beautiful watch? 😂

  • @Pradiip79
    @Pradiip79 4 года назад +11

    How do you as a customer know for sure that is a genuine piece of the Wright Flyer? Since they already have a poor track record with truthfulness in regard to their movement, i'm not sure i'll buy into the Real Wright Flyer gimmick

    • @dimman77
      @dimman77 4 года назад +4

      The Wright relative that gave it to them also gave a bunch to other brands. It isn't the fabric from the actual plane, but spare or left overs that never flew. Shinola also got some, and made a Wright watch before Bremont.

    • @przemyslawskoczylas5183
      @przemyslawskoczylas5183 4 года назад +1

      Exactly! For that price, if they manage to sell just a few, they will likely pay off all the line production. Worth trying. I cant go wrong, asking for 10x my salary another employer if im already employed. Chances are that someone will pay more then im worth anyway

    • @sirbuftontufton5846
      @sirbuftontufton5846 4 года назад

      @@dimman77 Not really true. The plane's fabric has been changed several times, keeping the original frame. The off-cuts supplied to Bremont are (supposedly) from the original fabric now kept in storage.

    • @dimman77
      @dimman77 4 года назад +1

      @@sirbuftontufton5846 The story is this was "found in an attic". And it makes the rounds whenever Wright relatives are trying to raise money "to preserve Orville's house", which is another part of the whole shady story. The house that they grew up in and built the plane in has been a part of the Henry Ford museum for over half a century. The relatives are talking about a house that Orville lived in way after the events but always make it sound like the original one. They didn't have access to the original plane or materials. But one of them allegedly found it in an attic? Lol. They can't even tell you how much there is because they claim to be always giving some away in exchange for donations for the house. Everything about this watch and story are scammy. I mentioned elsewhere that Shinola was given a piece of the magic cloth too, a little 2inch-ish square. They made a (heavily press release spammed) presentation to the stuff to a museum. Bremont cut it into tiny pieces and sold it for obscene prices. Kinda says something about them, don't you think?

    • @sirbuftontufton5846
      @sirbuftontufton5846 4 года назад +2

      @@dimman77 I did a fair bit of research after my original post, and nothing like your "story" came up. Still, if you'd care to provide links to source material for your version of events I'd find it interesting. I have no skin in this game - bits of history inside watches do nothing for me personally. Accusations of fraud, on the other hand, interest me greatly.

  • @itsaty7760
    @itsaty7760 4 года назад

    I must know the name for the BGM track! It’s just epic

  • @joelshalom001
    @joelshalom001 4 года назад +1

    I swear ur content is so amazing that sometimes I forget I'm watching just a video or a documentary!!!! Supa Like for ur content!!!! Big Fan for the history and facts shared!!!!

  • @jesvans
    @jesvans 6 месяцев назад

    that rotor is over the top!!! the fragment and the prop = 👍👍👍.
    would be very cool if the hands were props.

  • @commentjedi
    @commentjedi 4 года назад

    Beautiful watch! What is the price?

  • @Drakovox
    @Drakovox 4 года назад

    4:39 Master shot... well done!!!!

  • @petterfaye-wevle12
    @petterfaye-wevle12 4 года назад

    Good video!

  • @pandora8478
    @pandora8478 4 года назад +11

    £18k? I don't think so (for what you get).

    • @TechPanzer
      @TechPanzer 4 года назад +3

      The Wright Flyer fragment on its own is already worth that. I'd buy the watch just because of it.

    • @pandora8478
      @pandora8478 4 года назад +1

      Zonda you’re a wealthy man that has £18k to spend on a watch! (The average wage in the UK is about £26k).

    • @kildareman051
      @kildareman051 4 года назад

      @@pandora8478 As of February 2019 the average wage is a shade over £35,000

  • @shafiqshafiq5110
    @shafiqshafiq5110 4 года назад

    Hi..would love if you can review Akrivia; maybe AK-06 or Chronometre Contemporain.😄

  • @shareurtube
    @shareurtube 4 года назад +106

    For the money I would prefer to own a Grand Seiko with a superior pedigree.

    • @raioni1059
      @raioni1059 4 года назад +19

      There's a "I would get a GS instead" in every single comment section of this channel.

    • @MrAhuraMazda
      @MrAhuraMazda 4 года назад +11

      It seems like all the comments are "Id rather own a Grand Seiko" and not "I own a Grand Seiko." If you dont actually own a Grand Seiko, shut up. Theyre $3000. Easily accessible for any adult watch fan.

    • @MrAhuraMazda
      @MrAhuraMazda 4 года назад +9

      @jake then shut up. No one wants to hear about how great Grand Seiko is and how bad Hublot is from a bunch of trolls who have no skin in the game. Walking around with their $200 Orient Bambinos and shit snotty opinions on matters they dont have ANY real life experience with. It's one thing to be a pretentious snot. It's another to be a pretentious snot and not even own the brands they're championing.
      If you're not prepared to save up a measly $3000 for an entry level luxury watch, then stop commenting. Stop talking about Grand Seiko, Rolex, Hublot, IWC. You're not a real watch fan and your shit, condescending opinions dont matter. Im tired of broke losers being the loudest, most obnoxious on these forums.

    • @MrAhuraMazda
      @MrAhuraMazda 4 года назад +3

      @jake and btw, just to be clear, the classless ones are these window shopper douchebags praising Grand Seiko and Rolex on social media and shitting on other watches theyll never even see in real life let alone ever own. They're the tasteless, classless, broke losers, who have ZERO authority to speak.

    • @MrAhuraMazda
      @MrAhuraMazda 4 года назад +7

      @jake you need to go back to school and learn to read. Im not an elitist. I am CRITICIZING pretentious Grand Seiko elitist, 99% of whom dont even own a Grand Seiko. But still go around watch forums knocking on anything with an ETA base regardless craftsmanship of the watch as a whole. Why?? Cause theyve never held a Hublot. They never held an IWC. They never held a Breitling or a Tag Monaco. Or a Cartier. They don't fucking know. They don't know a fucking thing. They dont own any of these things, they've never even seen them in real life, only on their pathetic Instagram accounts. Theyve never dealt with Seiko's shit Service Center either, the worst watch servicing in the market.
      But they stand on their high horse, probably wearing a dog shit Orient or some 3rd hand Speedmaster that's 20 years overdo on a real service, extolling the virtues of watches they dont dream of owning. Like trashing the $18,000 one in this video. THAT is elitist. They're not even watch snobs. They're FAKE watch snobs, the bottom of barrel.

  • @amcluesent
    @amcluesent 4 года назад +8

    Bremont Belle End is an overlooked timepiece

  • @fbkensarhd5279
    @fbkensarhd5279 4 года назад +1

    Seiko ❤️
    In house.
    Affordable.
    The same went for hmt until they died. :(

  • @DanyboyS7
    @DanyboyS7 4 года назад +3

    Amazing watch... however the price is just too too much

  • @tianqi0324
    @tianqi0324 4 года назад +1

    4:40 just WOW!!

  • @alext2933
    @alext2933 4 года назад +11

    You would have to be MAD to pay this much for this watch, totally off the wall nuts.

  • @menaseven9093
    @menaseven9093 4 года назад

    Beautiful Bremont pilot watch, I like the dial and the second at the 9 position, I like the big crown and like the display case back showing the movement with a plane propeller. I don't understand why developing a three hands watch movement cost $1 million when a watch movement made of gears and spring is less complicated then a car engine.

  • @ahmedsallam1179
    @ahmedsallam1179 4 года назад +5

    I saw that watch with Concord pieces into the movement and the price ? 18k !! They need to tone it down

    • @ashleyj4827
      @ashleyj4827 4 года назад

      Raymond Redington I’m guessing you looked at the white gold version?

    • @ahmedsallam1179
      @ahmedsallam1179 4 года назад

      @@ashleyj4827 yeah it was , still 18 k?

  • @Trex100
    @Trex100 4 года назад +1

    Awesome looking watch.

  • @CJ-rb3do
    @CJ-rb3do 4 года назад +30

    Everything about the English brothers seems fishy. From their landing in Mr. Bremont field to deals with the Military seems dodgy at best. Instead of selling themselves as a watchlover’s watch, they have their marketing strategy completely wrong. The English brothers need to take a step back and let watch men run the company... oh, and it I mention their prices are massively too high?

    • @user-wi9nn6dz8w
      @user-wi9nn6dz8w 4 года назад +8

      I am just waiting now until it turns out that the brothers aren't even English 😂

    • @Bignewshound60
      @Bignewshound60 4 года назад +7

      The real story is far more tragic and worthy of note. Nick and his father were involved in a plane crash. Nick was seriously injured and his father was killed. Do you homework before you defame

    • @CJ-rb3do
      @CJ-rb3do 4 года назад +2

      Easy Simon. We are just saying, there’s something phony about the brothers. That’s my only point. I’m not sure they are in it for the love.

    • @Bignewshound60
      @Bignewshound60 4 года назад

      André apple copied - and even lifted code - from Microsoft. Go figure

    • @Bignewshound60
      @Bignewshound60 4 года назад

      C J did you actually read my response.

  • @Bignewshound60
    @Bignewshound60 4 года назад +2

    As always, great video. The story about the formation of Bremont is not quite as you tell it. It’s beginnings are born out of a real tragedy. Possibly a slight disservice to Nick and Giles to glibly tell a story about them being forced to land a biplane in a French field. Look it up.

  • @theloneprobe843
    @theloneprobe843 2 года назад

    I tease myself asking if, like in coins collectionism where a flaw, due to a printing error for istance, enhance its value, also watches can be valued as more rare and perhaps unique for something as deplorable as an invalid "inhouse movement" declaration. I may be naive, but as someone whose not that fan of Bremont, I'd love to hear the story of how this collection piece has originally the feature of "inhouse movement", and after looking better it received reproaches and almost made scandal, but that in the end it became a singular story capable of enriching its value. It has a very good looking style and I love the rotor in its back. Let's forget this unlucky event.

  • @santrade10
    @santrade10 4 года назад +1

    Just wondering if the same goes for Tudor's "in house movement" seeing as it was developed by Breitling .

    • @deltropico7
      @deltropico7 4 года назад

      Since one can get a B01 for a fraction of a Breitling, i don't think anybody cares 😂

    • @koolpep
      @koolpep 4 года назад

      santrade10 Developed and produced by Breitling ready for casing. And vice versa for the Tudor movement Breitling uses in the Suoerocean Heritage II - produces by Tudor for Breitling ready to case. I think in the future we see more of that after Kenissi starts producing Chanel, Tudor, Breitling and more movements.

  • @user-wi9nn6dz8w
    @user-wi9nn6dz8w 4 года назад +18

    While the movement is in-house from Arnold & Son, the dial design was ripped off in-house by Bremont from A. Lange & Söhne 😂

    • @ingra888
      @ingra888 4 года назад

      What about Hublots original Big Bang, with the ETA 7750 calibre selling for £££££

    • @MrAhuraMazda
      @MrAhuraMazda 4 года назад

      No cares you're "getting annoyed", if you dont like it dont buy it (which you obviously cant even afford to anyhow). The 7750 is a perfectly good movement and no, your shit $700 microbrand that has a 7750 is not the same total package. But anyhow, no one cares you're "annoyed." Youre not even a participant in any of this just another dumb spectator.

    • @michaelbishop9157
      @michaelbishop9157 4 года назад +3

      @@MrAhuraMazda I think at least 15 people do

    • @goldendawn7
      @goldendawn7 4 года назад +1

      @@ingra888 or Hublots sellita based watches selling for $7k!

    • @goldendawn7
      @goldendawn7 4 года назад +1

      If IWC is so proud of how they modify 2892s and 7750s why aren't they more transparent about what exactly they do to modify them? An IWC branded rotor is not enough for the premium.

  • @miropribanic5581
    @miropribanic5581 4 года назад

    I love your voice, I also think you did some training...the skillful way in which you present all those stories and anecdotes....I could listen for ages

  • @PrimeMatt
    @PrimeMatt 4 года назад +5

    Love the video, not keen on the watch, or the brand, even more so after watching this.

  • @NLJamba
    @NLJamba 4 года назад +22

    If they lie about the origins of the movement, how do we know they don’t lie about this piece of material?

    • @SuperAkr1
      @SuperAkr1 4 года назад

      See my reply above.

    • @cedarcanoe
      @cedarcanoe 4 года назад

      Nick P. Exactly what I was thinking

    • @artyom-ei2mf
      @artyom-ei2mf 4 года назад +1

      @Spartan Nation yes and I am an alien from the sun. The Soviets them selves tracked the missions with their technology and confirmed that. If anyone in the world would be the first to prove the us the liar it would be the Soviet union. Not to mention the many mission of other countries such as japan , India and *china* the country that would also love to prove the us wrong proved in their missions that the landing indeed happen. Notice how I never gave information taken from the us but from other countries and there are more these are just few examples. The next thing you tell me is the earth is flat.

    • @Bignewshound60
      @Bignewshound60 4 года назад +1

      Nick P. Because they didn’t. Do your homework.

    • @NLJamba
      @NLJamba 4 года назад

      Simon Howson-Green I am not interested enough in this watch (nor financially capable of buying it) to spend more of my time on it.

  • @chefpetey
    @chefpetey 4 года назад

    Am I just a silly novice for loving my Concords so much? I have 2 Impresarios...one the manual power reserve, the other the Monster with Zenith engine. My daily is a gen 2 Saratoga and also have the newest Saratoga plus a gen1 Saratoga Diver in Yellow. Never see reviews on these pieces. Your take?

  • @TokyoChopSquad
    @TokyoChopSquad 4 года назад

    Hold up... That shot through the jewel was god damn amazing.

  • @ingra888
    @ingra888 4 года назад

    What is the significance of the still camera.
    My eyes all ways lean towards it for a few seconds before I stare at the fabulous watch on show!

  • @ListerMotorsports
    @ListerMotorsports 4 года назад

    Very interesting !

  • @jf9669
    @jf9669 4 года назад

    Amazing history and watch.

  • @bcbliss5147
    @bcbliss5147 4 года назад

    I should also add hands down the best watch videos anywhere! Fantastic

  • @benjamindebell2502
    @benjamindebell2502 4 года назад

    Rolex explorer 214270. Can see the explorer 2 but would be good to have your video/commentary on it!

  • @Oozywolf
    @Oozywolf 4 года назад

    They do have a fantastic logo. It's a very pretty watch. Who knows, might be a collectors item with this story

  • @kevinyap1757
    @kevinyap1757 4 года назад +1

    This guy could sell me a heater in the dead of summer in the tropics of the Philippines.....

  • @Greeneyes3005
    @Greeneyes3005 Год назад

    I’m glad it happened… Because it’s caused them to move forward in their plans and produce the new 80/90 % in house movements they have for 2022/23 and get even closer to grail of manufacturing a fully ‘in house’ and cost affective British movement for the first time in 60 years in this country… very exciting times!

  • @paulsteele6120
    @paulsteele6120 Год назад

    I attended a jeweller/watch seller were this watch was on show. It is a nice watch, however I informed the sales assistant what had happened with the watch on debut, however she took umbrage and went away to get the stores owner. When he arrived I explained to him that I wasn't taking fault with it saying I'd rather have a watches "engine room" made by a recognised movement maker than what can only be described as an experiment timepiece which may or may not be a success! I also asked him how are the sales going? He admitted the sales girl was not really experienced with high end watches and after the story came out amongst watch aficionados sales fell off and where still slow. Asked did the public know how good LaJou.Perret movement are...he replied in the negative. I did make him an offer for it which he refused. Last time I went past the shop the watch is still on show.

  • @antcif
    @antcif 4 года назад +1

    For £18,000 I think my personal favorite would be a JLC. This is a pretty watch, but it’s just priced too highly.

  • @petes5152
    @petes5152 4 года назад +1

    There's no chance in hell that's actually a piece of THE Wright Flyer. Maybe a Wright plane but not the one they made their first flight with. I'm pretty sure the Smithsonian would have noticed if someone had cut a chunk of fabric off the wing.

  • @L.M1792
    @L.M1792 4 года назад

    Good story and a wonderful achievement in workmanship.

  • @MrShott13
    @MrShott13 4 года назад +1

    I would really like to see a video about watches as an investment.
    Which brands and models should we look for, and which are the ones to avoid?

    • @MrShott13
      @MrShott13 4 года назад

      @@robinarman7300 Audemars Piquet probably as well then?

  • @khismarsaupi9662
    @khismarsaupi9662 4 года назад +4

    I'd like to see a enicar watch reviewed plssss🙏🙏🙏

    • @khismarsaupi9662
      @khismarsaupi9662 4 года назад

      @ray h. Yes because i just bought one here in saudi arabia i just want to know if it worth the buy ☺️☺️☺️

  • @davedore6021
    @davedore6021 3 года назад +1

    Two things irk me about Bremont, firstly although the watches are undoubtably of a good quality, there is far too much emphasis placed on selling them ‘as a piece of British history’...putting a bit of Concord/Spitfire/Wright into the watch infers the watch is both historical and British which which clearly isn’t true, further to that the factory in its new incarnation is placed in one of the most expensive areas in England, if it were to be re-located up North and the prices dropped accordingly then they would be more competitive against stiffJapanese/Swiss competition.