Flysimware C414AW for MSFS - FULL RELEASE VERSION! | In-Depth Review with Two Commercial Pilots
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 23 июл 2024
- It's finally time to test out the other Cessna twin offering for MSFS, following the full release a couple of weeks ago. Does it stack up to the Milviz C310 which we enjoyed so much last time out?
TIMESTAMPS
0:00 Introduction
4:50 The real aircraft
10:40 Graphical model and liveries
21:55 Walk around
31:50 Start up and setup
44:30 Taxi and runup
1:00:31 Takeoff and climb performance check
1:22:10 Emergency descent
1:28:10 General Handling
1:31:22 SPEEEEN
1:32:15 Stall attempt 2
1:37:30 Short nav leg
1:46:21 Circuits
1:52:14 Engine Failure
2:01:35 Nathan's Conclusion
2:03:12 Kitty's Conclusion
Third party free liveries
flightsim.to/file/31235/cessn...
flightsim.to/file/31696/cessn...
flightsim.to/file/31487/flysi...
=================================================================================
Intro music by Infraction! - • Podcast Upbeat Corpora...
Crashing soundtrack - • [FREE] Infraction x Ai...
Outro music by MrMcNoggin - • Mr. McNoggin - Airwolf...
=================================================================================
Join us on Discord! / discord
Facebook - / flyfromhome
=================================================================================
DISCLAIMER
This footage was created by a real world commercial pilot and current commercial flight instructor. Although you may use this for learning purposes, it is recommended as guidance only and should not substitute any training from your ATO. It is intended to merely provide an insight into real world commercial training operations at a school we are familiar with and to enhance your desktop simulator experience. We are in no position to share or copy any company-specific data. If you are a trainee Private or Commercial Pilot, please refer to your approved training/company documentation ONLY.
=================================================================================
Software used:
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 
Игры
Great stuff. I'm the lead tech advisor for FSW, and also the owner of the real world airplane used for development. If you'd ever like to do a follow-up video on the FSW 414AW, I'd be happy to join you for another installment!
Oh wow, that would be fantastic! I’d absolutely be up for that!
Very late to this thread but this has to be the best way I've spent my money in the sim. The aircraft is absolutely perfect. Sounds, textures, systems depth are all fantastic. I don't know how you did it but the flight model is incredible, it is a true joy to hand fly.
Thank you so much
I just want to say how much I appreciate the long more or less unedited in-depth reviews you make. Planes like this really deserves it if you want to show the depth of the simulation.
I’m glad to hear that! It took me the whole weekend to upload this video on my terrible internet connection so I’m happy to hear my efforts weren’t wasted 😂
Thank you for all the great in-depth content!
Glad you’re enjoying it!
What a fantastic review. Appreciate the time and effort you put in to make a review of this depth.
Thanks! Glad you enjoyed it.
Really like having 2 people going through the checklist. Would like to see more videos like this. You should try and trick each other by either leaving out a step in the checklist to see if the other one picks it up or "forgetting" to implement a step and seeing if this gets picked up.
I forget to do stuff all the time, without it being intentional 😅
Glad you enjoyed the video!
A great work! Thanks for that complex review.
You’re welcome!
Really enjoyed the review. Appreciated the depth you went to. Great to hear feedback from a 414 pilot. Thanks.
Glad you enjoyed it!
You did an amazing review!!!!!!!! Thanks so much i really appreciate your efforts!! 👏👏👏
Thanks! Glad you enjoyed it.
I do love these in depth reviews, especially the stall tests :), and the contrast between your and Nathan's accents is catnip to these New Zealand ears :)
Yeah the stall was a bit too exciting this time 😂 Glad you’re enjoying our funny accents!
I really like this C414AW too, 10/10
🛩️
Thank you for a really in-depth analysis of the plane...
You’re welcome ☺️
You both are just super good. Loved this
Thank you!
Many thanks for this in depth video !
I already own the Milviz C 310R and have had a lot of fun with it.
But after watching your video I guess I can't resist getting this beautiful bird.
Hopefully it's not too complex for my siming skills 😅
Keep up your great reviews
You’re welcome! There’s some great documentation which comes with the 414 - read that and use the in game checklist and you should be fine 👍🏻
Good work mate, enjoyed watching ! I've have had this aircraft for months :)
Glad to hear! Yep, it’s been out a while but I wanted to wait for the full release to do it justice before I made a review.
@@FlyFromHome My favourite aircraft by far ! Momo and the other developers keep updating very frequently, hard to keep up with every new version. I’ve hardly tested one, before next one is out :)
Absolutely, I had to join the FSW discord to keep track of all the new updates because they come out so regularly 😂
@@FlyFromHome v2.8.1 out already. That’s what I love 💕 about this developer, constant improvements…teamwork with the users :)
A great review - thank you. And congratulations on having reached the 3K subscribers mark!
A while ago, I wanted a twin prop in MSFS and didn't want the Seneca for various reasons. I was intending to buy the Milviz 310 but, back in March before it was released, I received an email from TDS to say that using their GTNXi was being included as an option in the Flysimware 414. I hadn't even heard Flysimware were making one. However, seeing that it was in beta and therefore reduced in price, I decided to buy it instead of the 310 - the main reason being that the 414 is turbo-charged and has a pressurised cabin, letting me fly higher and faster than the 310 would allow. Witnessing its evolution into the aeroplane it is today has been very interesting; I've enjoyed flying it from the day I bought it and don't regret my choice one bit. Seeing how much work has gone into the 414 to date, I am sure that if the possibility exists for working CBs and maintenance elements to be included in future updates, they will be.
Congratulations Flysimware, and thank you, for having produced such a great GA aircraft for MSFS; I know it's been a labour of love but believe me - all the blood, sweat and tears have been worth it!
I’m not sure what impressed me more actually, the quality of the plane or the effort and attitude of the developers! Can’t wait for their next release 😊
@@FlyFromHome Absolutely! I'm really hoping you manage to do the follow-up video with S4 Aviator sometime - that would be fascinating to watch.
Brilliant review, thank you! My new criteria for a "study level" addon (including in X-Plane) is the Fenix A320 and the Flysimware's Cessna 414AW is very close behind. In the cockpit, I can almost smell the characteristic mixture of plastic heated by the sun and engine oil like in the C172 from my private pilot lessons and the sound of the engines is like music that I never tire of! Circuit breakers that don't work won't interest me until random outages are programmed -A subscriber to your very professional and informative channel.
I add the Milviz 310 to your list. At least for MSFS.
That’s just the feeling I get when flying it around too! I’ve heard lots of good things about the Fenix and the price is very competitive. Airliners aren’t really my ‘thing’ but I might have to bully Jimbo into trying it at some point 😂
Glad you enjoyed the review.
Simply amazing aircraft and review, a study level review video, this content is so helpful and nice to consume - really appreacite these.
This is a creature of love by the devs for sure, and top of my wish list (alas along with a new PC/GPU, flight controls, and add-ons) still waiting for that lotto win lol 👌
Thanks! Yeah the 414 is a fantastic addon, the devs really put in some effort to make a very realistic aircraft.
Series X + a hotas will run you about 600$, not too bad considering the quality of the sim on Xbox. I've been sorely missing out on some of the great mods but the console is slowly catching up, especially with wasp support.
The Xbox can produce some jaw dropping visuals on msfs, an equivalent PC would run you at least twice as much.
Cheers and see you in the skies
@@waitbalthy6342 It's great that the Xbox is bringing flight simming to so many new people 😄
Briliant test, I learnt a lot from this video
Glad you enjoyed it!
A curse on both of RUclips's houses! I can't believe I haven't had this channel come up in my recommendations before!
Still, it looks like I've got lots of great videos to catch up on now. I look forward to it. Thanks FFH! 🙂
Welcome aboard! If you can sit all the way through this one then there are a few other videos on the channel that I'm sure you'll enjoy :D
That Piper break dancing during the review really added something, lol. Great review overall!
Thanks! Yes it’s always good to see a plane practicing spinning on its head.
@@FlyFromHome Must have missed it at the start, but was this the PMS 750 or the TDS 750?
@@shinkicker404 It's the PMS
Bought that aircraft on the earlr beta phase and enjoyed every seconds of it. The devs are also super active on their discord channel. Can't wait to see what will be their next project!
Yep, the devs have a great attitude. Whatever their next aircraft is I’ll be trying it.
Hope it is a twin turboprop this time! I wanna climb at 150knots with 2000ft/min and Cruise at 250kts
Hi there.
I just wanted to state that your content is exactly what I was looking for.
I have a SEP PPL and I am a (former) Cat B1 and now Part-145 QM that simply lives for aviation.
Due to financial constraints I barely fly twice a month, usually Diamond Katanas that I utterly hate.
Your video drove me to get the 414, which I love from minute 1.
The fidelity of the model and its‘ flight modeling just takes you away.
This is -so far- the closest to real flying.
By the way, your comments on the 337 are -for me- spot on.
It really compares to flying a 210, which I am quite used to (I am a big Cessna and Piper high wing fan boy).
Pleas keep on doing those videos as they are amazing, especially for real life flyers.
I’m very happy to hear that you enjoyed the video! The 414 really is something special, it’s added a whole new dimension to flying in MSFS for me.
Looks like a natural progression from the 310, which I enjoy very much.
Yep, lots of similarities between the two but the 414 takes it up to the next level of complexity.
Great video
Thanks!
Such a great detailed video. I love learning about how and where particular aircraft are used in the world, where they're popular and why, etc.
Would be very interesting to know which GA aircraft are most common in the UK and Europe given you said this one is too inefficient for European fuel prices.
Thanks! Generally if it’s small and doesn’t burn much fuel we have lots of them. C150s and 152s are really popular, as are Pa28s. Our company operates Diamond DA42s as they run on Jet A fuel, which is much cheaper.
Thank you very much for this absolute brillant video! Such a lot of informtions brought me to buy this plane a few minutes ago✌🏼 One thing: your friend on the mic is very hatd to understand at the beginning because he is speaking so fast… Your stall manouver at 01:32 looked to me as a spin finally which you could have recovered with right rudder (against turn direction) maybe. But thanks again for your great work! Boris 🇨🇭
Yep, we’re trying some different things to improve Nathan’s audio for future videos. Yes I’m aware that we were in a spin, I had full opposite rudder and down elevator held in throughout! The 414 is very hard to recover from a spin promptly and we didn’t have much height to do it in. I also think the wing level function was inadvertently applying aileron which wasn’t helping!
Yeah, this is a plane I've been using/updating since the beginning, and I am very impressed with the level of detail and feel the designers have given it. This, to me, is the G.A. smaller twin equivalent in quality as what Fenix and Fly-By-Wire have given us regarding the A320, minus the circuit breakers. I'm not surprised that this is based on one of the designer's own C414, as an aircraft owner would attempt to meticulously model what they enjoy flying in the real world. As far as the Garmin, I use the TDS since that uses the exact Garmin trainer as the basis. The PMS model does not even though it's a good unit for the sim. But some of the features aren't modeled properly since it works in line with the MSFS 2020's FMS systems in general. I've used the 650 in a twin here in the U.S., and any addon that uses the Garmin trainer works absolutely like the real Garmin units. The TDS does that, just like Reality-XP does for other sims.
I’ll have to try the TDS at some point - the only thing that puts me off is that I think you can’t update the AIRAC cycle on it?
@@FlyFromHome Correct, though there is a 'database' button option that appears when it first boots, so I don't know if they are building an option for that later, but its primary database remains the same because it uses the Garmin trainer database that comes directly from the company. I think you can update that one if you have a Garmin subscription for the real units in the plane, though. But that database is fairly recent still - from last spring of '21, so it's fine for the vast majority of approaches and fixes (at least here in the U.S.). But for those who want to learn the real units and all of their features/behaviors, you'll want those that use the trainer; it gives you everything, and as it is. Its interaction with the autopilot is also more realistic: For example, MSFS 2020 draws a course line when you hit 'direct', and the plane flies back to that line before going direct, whereas with the TDS, you hit 'direct' and it will turn immediately toward the fix from the present location, unless you chose 'activate leg.' It can also fly fully coupled LPV approaches in the sim as well.
👍🏼Outstanding!
Thanks!
FSW did a wonderful job on the C414. I flew Cessna 404 and 421s early in my career and the 414 is very similar. I noticed your mention of lots of right rudder on takeoff. That may be a sim-ism. I do not remember the need for lots of right rudder on takeoff and climb out on the 400 series airplanes. It’s been 20 years since having flown a twin Cessna, but overall, this is a wonderfully accurate add on airplane and worth every penny.
That’s probably just my cheap, lightweight plastic pedals then 😂 I have to have the sensitivity turned down to avoid over controlling with them so any rudder inputs are quite exaggerated.
I agree though they’ve done an amazing job with this plane and the devs have a great attitude towards the community. Love your channel by the way!
@@FlyFromHome the rudder input is required on my PC also. The huge amount of rudder input must be a MSFS characteristic. There have been times full rudder is required to keep the airplane on the runway with just a 10 knot crosswind. The rest of the airplane makes up for it and the rudder input isn’t the fault of FSW. This is the only airplane I’ve flown in MSFS for the last three weeks. It’s great fun, it brings back memories, and flying it is like putting on an old pair of pants.
Yep, I know exactly where you’re coming from, nothing else really matches up to this right now as far as GA in MSFS is concerned. Just makes me wish I’d gotten the chance to actually fly the one I rode around in!
@@FlyFromHome I have around 500 hours between a C404 and C421. The 404 was amazingly fun to fly but lacks pressurization. The 421 is pressurized but lacked the ability to carry the weight the 404 could carry. Back then, as a 23 year old flying single pilot under part 135, I was on cloud nine.
This might be the best aircraft in MSFS. Certainly this is the best review.
It’s certainly been my favourite to fly ever since I got it. Thanks for the compliment, glad you enjoyed the video!
750 video? Yes, please!!!
We’ll get on it 🫡
very thanks!
You’re welcome ☺️
the best vid on the 414 on youtube
Thanks!
Very nice film. One thing I happened to notice. One engine down should produce a slightly off center ball as it's normal position as opposed to a "centered ball".
Great review on a wonderful job by Flysimware.
Depends if you’re flying 5 degrees angle of bank into the live engine or whether you’re aiming to fly wings level with the ball centred 😉 We usually teach the latter for instrument flying and the former for EFATO scenarios.
@@FlyFromHome Interesting. Over here we teach things a bit differently. We teach that the airplane doesn't know if it's on instruments or in CAVU conditions. :-))))))
The logic is that it’s very hard to maintain the 5 degree AoB and slip ball position on instruments in hard IMC when you’re stressed out trying to work out why your engine just stopped lol. Lots of debate to be had on the subject though I’m sure!
@@FlyFromHome : I'm afraid we'll simply have to respectfully disagree on this one. Naturally there is a LOT of stress involved when an engine goes down in IMC. This is ASSUMED in good multi-engine training. This however doesn't change the aerodynamics involved with the situation. Hard or easy, with an engine down the aircraft is either configured to handle sideslip or it isn't. A centered ball forces the aircraft to maintain sideslip and this isn't considered good practice ( over here with us argumentative colonials anyway :-)
The objective with solid training is ALWAYS to place the emphasis on what is best for the aircraft as opposed to what is "easy" for the pilot.
I would be hard pressed to discover even one solid source in our training manuals over here that advocates centering the ball with one engine out.
But with your permission I'll depart this exchange at this point in the interest of international relations and simply assume we have a friendly disagreement on this issue.
My very best to you.
And likewise to you sir 🫡
Great flight n review, sir... I fly the Chancellor also on MSFS n by far my favorite aircraft. ..but ironically I too got myself into a flat spin in the C414. Heading to St Barts from the Bahamas, I left the aircraft on auto pilot at around 10,000ft msl. And jus so happen to fall asleep n woke up to the aircraft alarms going off, n aircraft in a flat spin. Talk about startled affect lol, I was now in full panic mode n noticed I had ran out of fuel in one of the tanks and was not on xfeed Config. But long paragraph short lol...I REMEMBERED the PARE acronym and save it with 492 ft to go! 😅, I really fight to save her because I do hate crashing her lol, well hope to fly with u someday. Later
Sounds like an exciting trip! Glad you’re enjoying the plane.
Very nice plane, reasonable price. Will add to my hangar for my Air Hauler company for my personal plane for some hoc passenger flights for my company. 😊 Hope it has engine lifes imposed for the
Engine maintenance as you go like A2A.
I doubt you’ll regret it, it’s an excellent aircraft.
One of the best reviews ever! Being not native English speaker for me really difficult to understand the accent of 2nd voice. I just bought the plane after watching the review!
Thanks for the kind words. Glad you enjoyed the video!
@@FlyFromHome Sorry I did not want to be rude, I immensely appreciate the time and experience Nathan shares with us, the more videos I see the more accustomed I'm getting to his accent.
@@annoluce71 no problem, we know he can be a little hard to understand at times. We’ve been working on ways to make his audio clearer in the future.
Nice!
😄
Couple of general flight questions for you & nathan if you don't mind: (apologies if I missed them).
- The electric fuel pumps have a sound a little like an alarm, do you fly with these on always even in normal cruise? On for takeoff and landing and not sure on postion for climb/cruise?
- The gear warning for pulliung back throttles - can it be silenced when doing manouvers or not?
- RPM Manifold for cruise are 2300 rpm? and 3000 (manifold?) little unsure of target needles for climb, cruise and decent
-The autopilot IAS selector? little confused about this plane doesn't have auto throttle does it? Is it just a pitch for speed control?
-Flaps settings 3 (take off is no flaps generally I heard, what are the speeds for flaps white arc is stage 2 or 3 flaps? and gear down was 120kts?
- Also there a WT version of aircraft which I understand stands for working title? and changes the autopilt from MSFS to another verions? Is this something much better to use as only just got aircraft and unsure on this variant?
Was going through the manual but it mostly a description of instruments but not flight settings but I enjoy doing more research and getting more familiar with aircraft.
Top stuff guys :)
- Electric fuel pumps go off in the cruise, unless you have a mechanical fuel pump failure
- Don’t believe there’s a warning horn cutout (there isn’t in the aircraft I fly irl either!)
- It depends if you want a fast cruise or something more fuel efficient. There’s a power settings table in the manual I believe.
- The IAS mode is what you use to climb and sometimes for descents too. It pitches the aircraft to maintain the selected IAS.
- White arc is always the most limiting flap speed aka the third one. The speed placards are next to the levers for the limiting speeds.
- WT version uses the WT autopilot, which is more fancy but I believe requires the PMS50 GTN750 instrument installed.
Hope this helps! I’ve got a bunch of other videos where I fly the 414 if you need any more inspiration.
@@FlyFromHome Fantastic thanks for answers, sorry to ask, I've been checking out more vids, and learnt a bit more about the gear warning and how linked to throttle settings.
I just got the plane for my birthday month a few days ago, loving it but need mroe practice, and getting back into MSFS, trying some FSE and VA stuff as well to see routes, and have some goals.
Thanks again for the content and fun videos!
Milviz 310 don´t received any update since release.
A big update Service Pack 1 is actually beta, would be very nice a new review with this update, and compare then 310 vs 414.
Also would be super cool a Tutorial Series for beginners from zero, of the plane and Garmin 750.
Congrats for the channel!
Yes, we’ll definitely have another look at the 310 when that comes out. Thanks!
the 310 did get an update or didnt ?
@@saren6538 SP1 still in beta, will be gold very soon.
It´s a huge update, a 3 month update
Why is the Pilot's windscreen outlined in a thick black border (external view), but the Co-pilot's windscreen isn't? (00:01:12 into to video is a good view) Texture error?
Beautiful plane though, and great review.
That’s actually the heating element for the windscreen! In the review we talk about how only the pilot’s side has the expensive heated glass.
I have definitely had that spin happen with the same results unexpectedly with several top rated paid aircraft in msfs 2020. Every time it happens I lmao because it’s “not how it’s supposed to work” but it’s always amusing. I think they tried to model people making the mistake of putting the plane into the hard spin a little to well. You can get it to do it intentionally as expected but sometimes it happens when it shouldn’t as well. Either way it’s always good for a laugh unless it’s the end of a long flight about 500 ft from the runway. Something else to think about, prop sync wasn’t on and this as you pointed out is an aircraft props spin in the same direction. I would expect putting it into a spin should be a little easier than one with counter roaring props. Anyway, that’s not the worst uncontrollable spin I’ve seen or had in msfs 2020. Always good for a laugh. Still watching the video but I’m wondering if engine damage is correctly modeled. Milviz apparently did well on the 310 with that regard. Great review so far thank you!
Too* since the edit button never works.
I’ve only ever had this on this one occasion personally - just so happens that we were filming it!
Looking for a twin and this seems to fits the bill. One thing, IRL when cycling the flaps, as you can't see them from i side , how does one tell if they cycled correctly ?
There’s a flap position indicator next to the lever!
@@FlyFromHome DOH ! Of course it is. I am so used to flying pipers 3’s and small GA where you look outside to see the state of the flaps.
Early on in the video you say you could not find the engine model in the documentation. In the manual it says they are 2 x Continental TS IOL-550A 325hp engines. As you say :)
Oh well done! My reading comprehension clearly isn’t up to scratch 😂
Hello. Ive got a question about PMS50- do you think it’s still worth to get it after AAU1update? Also, thanks for the review, bought my first payware GA plane because of it. Until now I’ve only bought airliners
The GTN750 is still a much more capable instrument than the 530, so it still comes with plenty of advantages compared to the default, even with the WT upgrades. However, it’s by no means a necessary purchase to have a realistic experience in the sim.
@@FlyFromHome I just saw their trial program so definitely gonna give it a try. Thank you very much!
Trying to decide between this and the C414. What does everyone think? Has anything been added to this since release, or anything been broken in MSFS upadtes since this review?
working fuses are in the works and will be in the next update - and this will be the last added functionality to this aircraft
Yep I saw that on the FSW discord!
FFH Q: what aircraft do your fly mostly in IRL atm then?
Love the Airwolf theme at the end - that takes me back a bit. 👍❤
Nathan flies the King Air 200 series and I mostly fly the DA42 these days along with the Piper Arrow.
@@FlyFromHome That great - I miss my flying days but only got to fly the PA28 - but enjoyed it very much, but get to experience more through MSFS. Safe flying 🛩️
I've purchased and downloaded the aircraft through msfs marketplace and upon loading into a flight the sim freezes and becomes unresponsive. I've wiped my com folder clean and redownload the aircraft but the problem persists. Any ideas?
Try the Flysimware discord, the dev is always on there answering questions!
I bought this Cessna 310 from Milviz and I want to point out one thing people should know. All those systems make it very difficult for my CPU (AMD 5800x) to keep up, normally my RTX 3080 graphics card is around 99% utilization, but with the Cessna 310 it's down to 58% and inputs from my TrackHat are a little bit delayed which clearly indicates that the CPU is a little behind with all my inputs, which makes the feeling of flying less realistic. I get about 80 fps so it's kind of fun 🧐. So if you are unhappy with the performance of the standard planes you will definitely regret buying the more advanced ones.
I’ve honestly not noticed a difference on my system, but thanks for the info!
since all the instruments in MSFS run through their framework, what's stopping developers from making instruments completely modular ? would be cool to reconfigure your plane with instrumentation as you like it.
Yep this is definitely possible, the Milviz C310 can swap the analogue attitude indicator and HSI for a couple of Garmin G5s.
@@FlyFromHome tbh I've had trouble with the 310 G5, it doesn't seem to display glideslope on GPS approaches, but the normal HSI works fine.
I wish there was a better GTN750 option. The PMs is expensive and missing features and the GTN750nxi can't update the nav files :( stock GNS530 for me
I need to book a 1h40m lesson with you one day ;)
You know where to find us 😜
3 days later I finally finished watching ...
Well: my own conclusion on this is I wish the team had done the 310! ground handling on this feels much better and I agree generally it's got the edge - some bits of the 310 just aren't quite right from the POV of someone who's job was amongst other things to analyse behaviour/kinematics - but... it's a very wierd aircraft to have in a sim. The 310 is a GT car, a bit heavy, not too big, fairly maneuverable, and this is like ... a 7 series BMW or something, a bizjet for people who can't afford to run a jet - so it's a cumbersome beast that either feels underpowered for travelling, or unwieldy. It's not the fault of the model at all, it's just the plane itself. Maybe it'll grow on me, it might be something I'd like flying in a group. Also, I will try and do a bare metal retro paint...
The A2A Comanche is going to be interesting.
It's an amazing review. This quality of flight test doesn't really exist anywhere else... Thanks a lot for this great work !!
Any chance to share a link to the poh of the RAM IV version ? As you said, the documentation online is only for the A model.
Sadly I don’t have a full PoH either, just the documents I was able to gather from the Ram website. Glad you enjoyed the review though!
Do you have a link for the premium GTN750?
Just search for ‘PMS 50’ - that’s their website.
@@FlyFromHome Thank you. 🙂
I'm 40 minutes in to the video so far and really enjoying your unparalleled level of detail. Also got a kick out of the break dancing airplanes parked next to you. I'd been assuming that was an Xbox bug but apparently that's a bit of universal entertainment.
Now the following is not a complaint, just something I thought you guys might find humorous. While your friend's voice has been recorded with much better volume and clarity than last time, nothing can be done about the fact that he's from a certain part of the UK that us 'Mericans can't quite follow. I'm understanding 30 to 40% of what he's saying which is significantly more than the closed captioning which just threw up it's hands in defeat when I tried it.
Hopefully you guys get a kick out of this and take it in the good-natured way I mean it.
Thanks and here's hoping they bring the 414 to the Series X for me soon.
All feedback is appreciated! And yes, we had to cut the recording there because we were crying laughing at the spinning planes 😂
To be fair, I'm British & have to concentrate too ;) Nathan's mic is clipping somewhat in this one ( good old discord audio ) which doesn't really help.
Any hint whee to get performance tables?
Ram’s own website had the perf tables that we used!
@@FlyFromHome Yeah I found those early on as well but I think you would agree they are paper thin if you want to fly at any other altitude then 20.000ft
this is now broke, with the latest beta release, my game crashes every time i try and load this 414, every other plane is working in latest beta, just the 414 seems broke, hope they update ASAP
When they claim its a final release version, do they mean if a bug is detected nothing will be done about it?
Absolutely not the case! Something I didn’t mention in the review is that the developer is absolutely amazing at rolling out constant updates and bug fixes. We filmed this video about a week ago and already the version we used here is two update cycles behind the current one!
No, that means they've fixed all the bugs they know about - not that they'll never fix any more.
This thing is so loud and I can't figure out a way to adjust
In the cockpit? Try using the ‘headphone simulation’ mode in the audio options.
"Usually you're stuck with a fixed card compass or something Rubbish like that" truer words have not been spoken 🤣
Sounds like you’ve been there a few times too 😂
@@FlyFromHome a few too many 😂
What is the critical altitude?
Believe it’s 21,000ft pressure altitude for these upgraded engines.
🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟
Another great review, but these prices are just too high. $40 is more than a third of what I paid for the entire game.
Yeah I agree, as someone who doesn’t exactly have a huge amount of disposable income it would be lovely if these fantastic aircraft could be made cheaper. But to put it into perspective it’s still less than half the price PMDG used to charge for their airliner addons for P3D…
Guys I love this plane but its got me pulling my hair out at the moment. I can't see the pushback tug anymore. It can still pushback with shift p but no little truck :(... I have tried uninstalling clearing community folders etc everything short of a complete re-install which on my connection is a 12 hour job... Long shot I know but anyone experienced this and knows a fix :)
You might be better off asking on the Flysimware Discord server if you have an account. The devs are very active on there.
@@FlyFromHome Ty for the reply :)
Thanks for the vid. Beats the 310 for me. Flight model over maintenance any day.
Yep, have to agree with you there!
2nd voice pretty garbled at times but good video. Very in depth.
Thanks! We’re still working on that audio quality for Nathan, we’ll get it right one day 😂
Wow these big girls are slow ... looks like 200 mph. Really love the short rounded nose 401. A beauty but also slow.
Depends how high you fly ofc, but imo 220+ knots on a piston light twin is pretty impressive!
You really shouldn’t turn into a dead engine especially at lower speed.
At critically low speed, no. But then again you shouldn’t be turning at all if you’re that slow. The 414AW has plenty of reserve performance, as does the aircraft I fly on a regular basis, so we have no limitations regarding turning into the dead engine.
@@FlyFromHome yeah, then again I guess Bob Hoover proved that don’t turn in too a dead engine thing wrong.
I'm pretty sure he could pull off almost anything in a plane 😂
The best!!!
Us or the plane? Either way I agree 😜
@@FlyFromHome yes I like it the most powerful: 640 horsepower in twin engine and on the other hand I don't know how to activate and adjust the altitude climb of the autopilot? Can you tell me?
@@jeremiel22 Select IAS mode and add some power with you desired altitude in the selection window.
Are you guys using shared cockpit? And if so, what program are you using for it?
No, Nathan was just watching a stream on discord.