Diamond Aircraft DA50RG. Part 1: Exterior, Interior, Avionics.

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 11 дек 2024

Комментарии • 32

  • @mariabatryn5540
    @mariabatryn5540 Год назад +5

    Oleksandr's attention to detail is insane! I'm pretty sure Diamond may notice an increase in sales thanks to reviews like this :)

  • @jmconsultingoffice5348
    @jmconsultingoffice5348 Год назад +3

    One of the best and complete aircraft reviews I've seen here.
    Congratulations. Keep up the good work.

  • @nikkarpenko3736
    @nikkarpenko3736 Год назад +5

    best review on Diamond😎

  • @George-oz8jk
    @George-oz8jk Год назад +1

    I've shared this video with my friends and we look forward to the sequel! Awesome!

  • @juliusouma4474
    @juliusouma4474 Год назад +6

    you have done the impossible. You have given the details i have ever wanted. What a beautiful review. Waiting for the remaining Episodes on flight and, Fuel burn Characteristics. Nice Video and keep it coming.

    • @egmontaviation
      @egmontaviation  Год назад

      Thanks a lot 🙌🏼 New videos are on the way 🚀

    • @ramezqubain8177
      @ramezqubain8177 Год назад

      @@egmontaviationplease hurry up, can’t wait to see them

  • @ЕгорГрисюк-ч1ф
    @ЕгорГрисюк-ч1ф Год назад +3

    Great job

  • @Jamesxyz234
    @Jamesxyz234 Год назад +2

    the most stylish and dreamy single-engine airplane

  • @LeandroAragon
    @LeandroAragon Год назад +3

    Amazing review guys!! really showing details for the first time and showing how amazing this plane is!!! Congrats!!!

  • @maksymki
    @maksymki Год назад +1

    Thank you very much for this review 👍 Can’t wait to see the flying part ✈️

  • @william_ochieng
    @william_ochieng Год назад +1

    Awesome video, can't wait for part 2.

  • @faridokimo7562
    @faridokimo7562 Год назад +1

    We need this beauty in MSFS..

  • @ukflyer11
    @ukflyer11 Год назад +1

    Great video. If you guys keep having aircraft reviews like this I’m a subscriber for sure.

  • @ramezqubain8177
    @ramezqubain8177 Год назад +3

    Can you explain who is this airplane is good for, ie mission etc, compared to DA40NG, DA42 and DA62?

  • @mojah1
    @mojah1 Год назад +1

    New subscriber to your channel
    Thanks for sharing, I really enjoyed the detailed information you have relayed
    Very well done very organized ✅

  • @flightinsider
    @flightinsider Год назад +1

    This one is so much better than our DA40… JET A1 fuel is the best ❤✈️
    We are planning to come to you one day and fly a DA50RG if you let us to 😊

  • @planespeaking
    @planespeaking 8 месяцев назад +1

    I think this is a fantastic aircraft that is actually in the modern age vs many of its competitors. It's aerodynamic, has a crash cell, and wing design that makes stall difficult. It is finished to a high standard and is straightforward to fly. People seem to have a real downer on diamond aircraft but I think they set the standard

  • @RobustO8
    @RobustO8 Год назад +1

    🔥

  • @ramezqubain8177
    @ramezqubain8177 Год назад +1

    Wow this guy is a great sales rep/consultant/expert. He should go to North America and do some selling

  • @3204clivesinclair
    @3204clivesinclair Год назад

    Nice aircraft, but not for my family. I once had an engine failure in a Arrow 2 immediately after gear up. Luckily it was on a 6000ft runway.
    A few years later doing my type rating on a KA350, my instructor and I were discussing single vs twin pros/cons.
    Later that day while holding at the line, we watched a C172 start his take off roll. My instructor said "if his engine quits around our V2 speed, he is in trouble, that's another advantage of a twin".
    I then mentioned my Arrow incident, he looked across, smiled and said "exactly".
    DA62 for me.

  • @supersavagegodgaming6888
    @supersavagegodgaming6888 5 месяцев назад

    But isnt FADEC system very expensive? i dont see this being everywhere in GA and im not even a pilot yet im studying now for the written test

  • @openbabel
    @openbabel 6 месяцев назад

    Why can't they have a Beach Bonanza club seating arrangement in this aircraft?

  • @HighCountryRambler
    @HighCountryRambler Год назад

    The "burning question" I've always had, if this Continental engine is a diesel, can it be ran on diesel fuel? Isn't a oil burner, a oil burner?

  • @davebergie
    @davebergie Год назад

    Uh... I seem to remember a recent video of a glider in cloud near the hills: "SPIN! SPIN!"
    I'd have been shitting myself in your glider, Tim.

  • @galactictomato1434
    @galactictomato1434 Год назад

    Definitely a sweet airplane but that tiny 49 gallon fuel tank is a deal killer. Range just can't compete with similar airplanes. I understand it for the European market, but in the US, diamonds biggest market, its a huge mistake

  • @herbbates4713
    @herbbates4713 Год назад

    That you make millions a year is the big factor

  • @Arturo-lapaz
    @Arturo-lapaz Год назад

    A T tailed horizontal stabilizer is waiting to flutter off at a high TAS speed at high altitude below Vne.
    This fact is always suppressed by salesmen.

  • @habibi750
    @habibi750 Год назад

    750 nm? Terrible

    • @planespeaking
      @planespeaking 8 месяцев назад +1

      As compared to what? These sort of aircraft are not doing long journeys. You have to fit the use case best.

  • @ОлегКо-э9к
    @ОлегКо-э9к Год назад

    Вся линейка даймонда неудачная и проигрывает по всем характеристикам конкурентам . Начиная от профиля крыла и геометрии и заканчивая фюзеляжем . Центр давления на фюзеляже имеет ярко выраженную А стойчивость , что приводит к колабсам на различных режимах . Весьма некомпетентное внешнее проектирование . Технологи попали в кабалу непрофессиональной команды аэродинамиков . Возьмите РЛЭ трех конкурентов и сравните сухие параметры .

  • @edmar5401
    @edmar5401 Год назад

    Hope you do the same for da62