If you're looking for more economic theories that aren't (((capitalism))) or (((communism))), I can't suggest anyone but Cultured Thug. Links: / mimirs_head_yt gab.ai/mimirs_head / discord
Another part of it is that in our current system you have the worst of society gaining access to either welfare or credit and they choose to spend this on the most shallow, frivilous garbage which they will forget about a few days after purchase (much of this is women having access to too much spending money....). This drives investment AND intellectual capital into these sorts of industries to make them cheaper/faster/slightly 'better' , etc, and this capital might otherwise go into far more beneficial industries (better health care, building methods, energy, etc, etc). Societies real wealth (in a materialistic form at least) comes from ingenuity and big breakthroughs in technology, and not pumping out cheaper plastic crap and having top minds working on the latest selfie app.
Environmental regulation is the most important restraint that must be placed on a functional market. No battery farming, no destructive irrigation practices, no logging old forests, no mines in the vicinity of fragile ecosystems etc... Set up firm boundaries along those lines, and a market economy could have its destructive potential curbed immensely.
Third position is similar to the European old style social democrats ( before the PC crap took over) but with a firm grounding in nationalist feeling, a mixed economy that serves the folk.
A social credit system is already in place in the west its called a credit rating and is still controlled by private interests and is horrific, how would any other social credit system be any different.
I disagree with the tired line about a first world lifestyle for 7 billion would require 3 Earths. Objectly nonsense. It's based a static rate of resource discovery and recovery ability and the entire of capitalism is non-static regarding that ability. Same peole said US would never Oil exporter after the 70s....oh wait. A better environmental argument is that consumerist economy based on a large degree of planned obsolescence limits the quality of life inherently and the type of goods and technology because it's based on high time preference. The results is long term mis-allocation which create feedback into vast waste production. We're not running out of stuff. We are polluting future resources thus making it look like a lacking in resources. We are burning the kindling instead using the logs.
Hey, I drop ship. Basically the markup I make is my advertising fee for selling the product. Also, lol at the Alex Becker reference. * edit was only to an auto correct mistake *
Almost all markets right now are drop shipped Things bought in bulk then sold for more All large retail stores basically work that way. I don't like it but I'm not going to not cash in until the the pipe is closed
I doubt he would tell any individual to stop - we all need to make money however we can within the rules of the current system (well there should be some moral limits obviously, maybe don't be a pornographer or be a left wing journalist ... lol)
This is the problem, you are too comfortable. "I know I'm a degenerate but I'll keep doing it until society stops" - you are a part of the feedback loop.
Mimir's Head I'm starting a permaculture farm with the profits mate. Without giving too many details me and some close friends who are aware of the current state of the world are preparing to buy up a lot of land as we develop local industry. This is a jumping off point. From making very little money to being able to fund our ideas. Its a means to an end What I can say is I don't drop ship trash. Its more like running a gas station but marketing to a niche I can contact all over north america.
[Strasser gang screeches in the distance]
Another part of it is that in our current system you have the worst of society gaining access to either welfare or credit and they choose to spend this on the most shallow, frivilous garbage which they will forget about a few days after purchase (much of this is women having access to too much spending money....). This drives investment AND intellectual capital into these sorts of industries to make them cheaper/faster/slightly 'better' , etc, and this capital might otherwise go into far more beneficial industries (better health care, building methods, energy, etc, etc). Societies real wealth (in a materialistic form at least) comes from ingenuity and big breakthroughs in technology, and not pumping out cheaper plastic crap and having top minds working on the latest selfie app.
Allowing women (naturally designed resource consumers, to no fault of their own) to engage in the economy is a huge mistake.
@@MimirsHead care to elaborate on that?
I can’t wait till your on JFs new show.
The guy that did that thing Back in 2017
Agreed
Environmental regulation is the most important restraint that must be placed on a functional market.
No battery farming, no destructive irrigation practices, no logging old forests, no mines in the vicinity of fragile ecosystems etc...
Set up firm boundaries along those lines, and a market economy could have its destructive potential curbed immensely.
One thing we need to do is simplify the regulation, and harshen the punishments. No more slaps on the wrists, we need to see heads roll.
I'm going to completely disagree with you, we need a bit more regulation.
Third position is similar to the European old style social democrats ( before the PC crap took over) but with a firm grounding in nationalist feeling, a mixed economy that serves the folk.
A social credit system is already in place in the west its called a credit rating and is still controlled by private interests and is horrific, how would any other social credit system be any different.
Greatest video I’ve seen all day.
I disagree with the tired line about a first world lifestyle for 7 billion would require 3 Earths. Objectly nonsense. It's based a static rate of resource discovery and recovery ability and the entire of capitalism is non-static regarding that ability. Same peole said US would never Oil exporter after the 70s....oh wait. A better environmental argument is that consumerist economy based on a large degree of planned obsolescence limits the quality of life inherently and the type of goods and technology because it's based on high time preference. The results is long term mis-allocation which create feedback into vast waste production. We're not running out of stuff. We are polluting future resources thus making it look like a lacking in resources. We are burning the kindling instead using the logs.
The Guardians of Scarcity.
Hey, I drop ship.
Basically the markup I make is my advertising fee for selling the product.
Also, lol at the Alex Becker reference.
* edit was only to an auto correct mistake *
Almost all markets right now are drop shipped
Things bought in bulk then sold for more
All large retail stores basically work that way.
I don't like it but I'm not going to not cash in until the the pipe is closed
I doubt he would tell any individual to stop - we all need to make money however we can within the rules of the current system (well there should be some moral limits obviously, maybe don't be a pornographer or be a left wing journalist ... lol)
This is the problem, you are too comfortable. "I know I'm a degenerate but I'll keep doing it until society stops" - you are a part of the feedback loop.
Mimir's Head
I'm starting a permaculture farm with the profits mate.
Without giving too many details me and some close friends who are aware of the current state of the world are preparing to buy up a lot of land as we develop local industry.
This is a jumping off point. From making very little money to being able to fund our ideas.
Its a means to an end
What I can say is I don't drop ship trash. Its more like running a gas station but marketing to a niche I can contact all over north america.
Almost all aspects of our economy are a joke
Our current version of money is awful.
Its all just a tool. Blood and soil are what matter most
There wasn't two positions to begin with, which is why presuming a third position is lol.
Good video, would you post a link to the picture doing the video.
The United States actually still has a huge manufacturing sector. Saying we've outsourced all of our manufacturing is wrong.
So we need national socialisism?