@@Cameron_FNot saying you are wrong but, it could be because the mother proved to the court that she could take better care of the child financially, stability, day care (or stay at home mom), etc. I wish that we knew 100% because my ex wife kidnapped my son for 6 years before I saw him again and he never went back to her...and Social Services was involved and and allowed her to get him back, without even having a place to stay....DSS actually had to meet her while she was trucking with her new boyfriend. They were in an 18 wheeler lol. So, I know how the system can be one-sided and most of the time it's the father that gets "railroaded".
That exchange between Attorney White and Judge Simpson was amazing. I geek out on lawyers (a judge is an advanced/expert lawyer, before anyone tries to correct me on that) arguing the law with such decorum and integrity. It's the stuff our system is built on. Much respect to both parties!
I have much respect for Mr Washington taking full responsibility for the dirty test and not trying to deny it and not complaining about the out come. Judge Simpson is very fair.
Why in the world do you do cocaine if you know you are dropping weekly????? But he did own it, giving him that, and he did show up to test knowing he’d drop dirty. Seems so smart that way, so why did he do the cocaine????
Judge Simpson is the man. Genuinely, I love that guy. I would love to have dinner with him and hear all the stories he has to tell. I bet it would be legendary.
Intern Zenda is a great lawyer in the making. Her skills have grown each time we see her. Ms Zenda taking the lead in a motion hearing says a lot about Ms Kirby’s confidence in her. Can’t wait to see how far she goes in her career.
Just seeing the possible deportation case and man I am impressed with the attorney taking responsibility for the misinformation given to the client. WOW I am amazed. Judge Simpson is in a tough place in regard to accepting the plea or not to. He's so intelligent when it comes to the law. He is my favorite Judge, I think. There are many I like but for so many different reasons and approaches. This was a great vid!!!
Hi Squishy. The answer is No way could I be a police officer, attorney, or judge. The stress and BS would cause me to be in jail or fired or both. The patience for ignorance and stupidity they must have is very much higher than I have.
I hope we get an update on that last case. I know it might be boring for some people but I haven't seen an ineffective counsel hearing in the American court system and I think it would be educational. - especially regarding the 2 sides of that particular issue. As an immigrant myself I'm not unsympathetic, but I also see the court's hesitation in setting a slippery precedent. Thanks OSG. Stay safe.
Oh, there are lots of *bad* "ineffective counsel" claims that come up, especially from SovCits. Kim Blandino pulled it at least once, after his final court-appointed lawyer somehow didn't manage to pull his well-roasted nuts out of the fire. I've seen a few cases in which lawyers screwed up really badly and failed to do right by their clients, arrogantly insisting to the end that they were in the right. I don't think I've seen a case in which a lawyer voluntarily admitted that they had failed their client and that the client deserved better.
We I do not see that all because when someone plea to a deal it is required they understand the full legal consequences and he was not told what all those consequences are especially the one that he could be deported over what many would call a spat. It really take nothing to be arrest for domestic abuse. A tiny scratch anywhere will do it.
OSG, you're always amazing with your clips. Some of these people are truly shocking. Judge Simpson is always fair but you must NEVER lie to him. Thanks for your hard work.
I luv the way that judge Simpson simply stated that there was cocaine found in the defendant's system then waited silently as the defendant set their dumbfounded and seemingly not understanding it was his time to speak.
Staying silent is an old psychological tactic and still used today. Humans can’t stand the silence and then try to fill the void by talking. Try it at a party or a gathering of people and watch what happens. Of course it may get you branded as a “weirdo “ 😊
@OldWomanfromtheMountains I like to do that. Especially when I know or suspect someone is lying to me. Unfortunately, a person I love has been lying to me for quite a while. It took a family tragedy for me to realize what this person was/is doing. I have had to put this person on Trust But Verify. And all I have discovered were more lies. The thing is, these are lies that don't need to be told. The truth would be much better. When I confront this person, more lies trying to convince me the other lies were the truth. And if I do the silent part, more lies are added until even this person can't keep track of any excuse they may give. I have known this person since the day I was born. So far, I don't need to expose the lies. I really don't want to have to expose this person. There are other people who have caught on and others like I was for so very long, that believe everything this person states. I don't want them to be hurt by the lies, however this is going into legal matters. I will not lie for her in front of a Judge. Because the truth is more than enough to suit her purposes. I've tried to talk to her about it only to have her lie again. So I do use the silent approach. In Court, I won't.
I enjoy seeing behind the curtain what goes on. I watch the arrest videos when I can find them. I understand the need for plea bargains but, I think sometimes they are a little too lenient.
You want to see bad plea deals? Watch @Mandoo and see the horrendous plea deals the DAs in Louisiana are handing out to child SA perpetrators & how quickly they come up before the parole board. A recent one, a guy got 4 yrs for SAing a little girl beginning when she was 4 yrs old and went on for years. He did 18 mos, & was up before the parole board. A bunch of people come up that have gotten life w/o, sometimes consecutive life w/o. They passed a new law that almost all of the life w/o have to come up before the parole board for a commutation hearing. An outside source should be going in & looking at the DAs down there handing out these deals because they don't want to take anything to trial! 🤬🤬🤬
I've seen people drink mouthwash if they couldn't get any other kind of alcohol. I can believe he drank 10 "non-alcoholic" beers in under an hour if that's what it took to appease his need for alcohol. Addiction can be a nasty animal 😢
In the last case, most people are focused on the wonderfulness of Rita White. I couldn't help but focus on how the defendant's wife is showing every cue with respect to being a DV victim.
I saw that deportation case live yesterday, man... I am very curious how this is going to play out!! Definitely keep us updated on that one if its live streamed for us. Im as confused as Judge Simpson is with it for a multitude of reasons. I mean, she is not an immigration attonery, so he would have HAD to have spoken with one prior to taking the plea, its literally required for that to happen, the judge requires that to happen, so to come in and say basically everyone told him the wrong thing is very odd to me.. It seems almost as if he just wasnt listening or assumed that, nahh ill be fime they wont deport me.. idk. Very interested in the resolution of this one. Thanks for the videos Squish!! You are the best!!
He committed DV and resisting officer (he plead guilty), there are consequences to actions. He was facing felony charges. Even if he is allowed to withdraw misdemeanor plea…the state will just refile the original felony charges. Admittedly the victim (wife) may refuse to testify. The assault/resisting will go forward. IMO - His lawyer saying ineffective assistance isn’t completely accurate. Defense attorney consulted an attorney with immigration specialty and provided that advice to client. Those seem like responsible and appropriate assistance. The defendant’s fight will be in an immigration hearing. The defendant has full right to waive any attorney/client privilege. If the communication is to his benefit…why not wave privilege.
If you plead guilty, you have to admit to the facts of the case under oath. Won’t they be able to use this against him if he’s able to withdraw the plea?
@@whitelobster1ifyif you withdraw the plea, you get to take that back, so it doesn’t count. It’s sort of like if the police start asking questions before Miranda rights- you can’t use that in court
Ain't it funny how THESE PEOPLE just LOVE their children /miss their children/crying for their children, but you know when their outa jail, THEY COULD GIVE A SH_T LESS!
It is so frustrating that these entitled, law breaking, reprobates have the gall to act so disrespectfully in front of a judge who holds their future in his hands by WEARING A HAT IN COURT! Hey paint licker....take your freakin' hat off in court.
They get their way in the streets by yelling louder than the person they are interacting with. I think it was also in part because of parents not telling their kids ( NO ) from time to time.
@@RoughThief It's a sign of respect. The same reason why it's considered rude to wear a hat at a dinner table while dining. The practice insinuates the subtle message of "I know I'm not going anywhere and you have my full attention."
Absolutely love Simpson. That lawyer in the pink definitely doesn’t get paid enough. 🤣 She knows and Judge knows the results. Simpson definitely a soldier 🙌💯
Never mind what Judge Simpson has to do every day and it must be very wearing indeed, however your clever editing provides us with much fun. I know that some of this stuff is serious/sad etc.
Wow. Ginther hearing and at the lawyer's own request! Incredible. You find the most interesting hearings! Oct 3 in person means it won't be on YT though. 😞
Those instructions are at the discretion is the court. He's not obligated to care about what other judge's care about. This is his livelihood. He chooses to live longer, not have high blood pressure and to move cases forward rather than get caught up on things that don't bother him.
6:07 middle row center Mushmouth from the Saturday morning cartoon Fat Albert makes an appearance. 14:14 middle bottom Mr. Creosote from Monty Python’s full length motion picture “The Meaning of Life”
@@lindadeeds5326Immigration law, especially in practice, is a completely different specialty than criminal law. It’s really unfair to judge Ms. White for not knowing that a guilty plea to a misdemeanor could get a green card holder deported. I worked in immigration for years, and I didn’t know that. U.S. immigration law is a big tangled mess thanks to it being run more on policy than statute for the last thirty years.
She's just trying to do the ethical thing here because she honestly believes she made a mistake that shouldn't be allowed to hurt her client. I get that Simpson needs the formal hearing, but I don't get all his annoyance and continued head-shaking. He teaches attorneys, and he should be encouraging the practice of honoring your oath, not acting like she's inconveniencing the Court with her 'petty ethical issues.' I like Simpson, but his general attitude is very pro-prosecution.
@@-HeyLyd- I think he's really just worried about the precedent it could set if it goes a certain way. idk the ins and outs of that but I know certain things in law can have ripple effects.
@@EbonMaster Yes, precedent is important; as I said, the hearing is necessary. But his apparent annoyance at her raising the issue is uncalled for. Set the hearing, hear the evidence, and then decide. What's the point of arguing and head-shaking once you've said you "have no problem" holding the hearing? She'll bring her evidence and it will be whatever it is.
He claimed 20-30 non-alcoholic beers. But like the Judge pointed out he'd have to drink those in the time it takes to drink 1 beer in order to keep those levels of alcohol in his system. That's friggin ridiculous. He knows he's lying his butt off. 🙄
Much respect for Atty White for owning up to her 'ineffective counsel' issue. When it comes to potentially destroying a family, she stepped up and is accepting her mistake. I hope it worked out for them.
I'm not so sure about PD Apple asking whether the second hearing will be in person at about 19:10 ... that might seem to be a simple, logical, and innocuous question, but what she was really doing [in effect, at least, if not by intention] is making sure that her client can go straight to jail, rather than getting to turn himself in.
I agree. Most defense attorneys, if needing to clarify, would have done so by specifically requesting that the hearing be virtual, to make it perhaps a little less likely that the client would be remanded. That said, she may know that Simpson doesn't really play games on that score, so if he's going to remand, nothing's stopping that.
@@-HeyLyd- Yeah. Or try this: maybe she was worried that, if Simpson were to revote on the spot, if he weren't there in person, he wouldn't have turned himself in and then her client problems would get worse. A defense atty isn't supposed to do something like that, even if she believes that it would be in the clients best interest long term, but maybe she did it anyway, because he might not turn himself in and/or he'd go out and slam 26 O'Douls in an hour again. tee hee (In other words, maybe she was trying to prevent her client from lying some more.) FYI: Simpson is entirely correct that you can't get to .06% BAC by drinking .5% ABV beers. There are studies on this.
I wonder why the defense lawyers just sit there and let their clients talk on and on and on... Those "non alcoholic " beers actually have some alcohol in them. It says it right on the can/bottle and box they come in. 20-30 beers at a time? Bull.
Mr Mote is admitting things in court that he SHOULD NOT be speaking about. Sometimes the Defendant is their own worst enemy! “Yes, Your Honor. No, Your Honor”
These frequent fliers that have been in court for years, sure seem to have trouble with the public defenders. The "if you can't afford an attorney, one will be appointed to you" lawyers. Swear it seems like if you PAY for one, you can choose who and how they represent you. If its for free, you are kind of limited.
Judge Simpson: we can provide transportation if you have a problem... I don't think you want us to do that. Lovonty : huh? Judge Simpson : Nothing 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Ms White seems to think that withdrawing the plea resolves the matter ... it doesn't if the plea is withdrawn then the felony charge is re-instated and has to go to trial if found guilty at trial not only MAY he face deportation but also prison time. Ms White you were not ineffective you were careless and should have known the plea deal would effect his immigration status.
Immigration status doesn't have anything to do with it. Defendant enters a plea and suffers the consequences. Why should an illegal wife beater get more consideration than a legal citizen wife beater?
@@tracy7612 Did you even listen to the argument??? The immigration status is very relevant the crime he plead to could mean his deportation it certainly means that he will be refused US citizenship. RE Why should an illegal wife beater get more consideration than a legal citizen wife beater? REPLY Can you tell me the difference between a legal wife beater and an illegal wife beater ?????? The non citizen resides in the US at the pleasure of the government and there is a greater onus on them to obey the laws. They are made well aware of in the green card application.
We're the system and you'll do it our way buddy. Ive never seen judge Simpson get upset at someone who has a reason to be upset and stressed but, aint a lot he can do about the public defender ignoring his calls.
This is not an excuse for Mr Shannon, but according to FDA & NLEA labeling regulations, a beverage must contain less than 0.5% ABV to be considered non-alcoholic. In general a normally healthy individual can process 1 oz of pure ethanol per hour and not have a change in bac. Assuming a 12 oz can at 0.49 % ABV, a can would have 0.06 oz ethanol/can. So to hit the 1 oz mark you would need to drink 15 - 18 NA beers. The gov’t of Southern Australia published a paper declaring 1 oz of alcohol would change a normal persons BAC by 0.01 - 0.03%. So, it is possible for NA beer to cause changes in BAC, but you really have to be dedicated to get there.
I think they need to make the rules clear about appearing by zoom in court in a letter or via their attorney, this guy is taking the absolute P**s here. Walking around shopping and a hat and hoodie on . They should be slapped with an automatic fine for being dressed inappropriately or get a contempt charge. We have people lounging in bed , slouching in chairs, smoking god knows what sometimes, wandering around the house or outside and the attitude is unbelievable, it may be zoom but it is court
*Naltrexone does not prevent anyone from feeling the effects of alcohol** In studies, it has only shown to decrease cravings and some euphoric effects with alcohol.
Case #5 - didn't retest on bad test, another bad test, and then another, missed test, and then another bad test? Does he think the Court is ignorant? See you at 3:00 o'clock, get affairs in order.
37:20 if anything, surely its the 1st immigration lawyer who was ineffective not the lawyer requesting the hearing. The lawyer we saw went over & above trying to protect her client.
Re the Filip case: it seemed to me the judge was saying he needed more info. The info exists but is protected by attorney /client confidentiality which the attorney said she was not prepared to waive. Couldn't Mr. Filip agree to waive confidentiality in regards to the immigration advice to get past the judge's concerns?
![YoungBoy Never Broke Again - Missing Everything [Official Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/dTYeMZGzOzw/mqdefault.jpg)
'We can provide transportation if you have a problem, but I don't think you want us to do that.' Epic mic drop!
I love judge Simpsons giggle. It's hard to be upset when you can actually hear someone's happiness. He would be the most amazing neighbor lol.
Mr Mote claiming his son is being withheld from him…when he is charged with Child Abuse. That’s protecting the child not railroading the defendant.
When did they say that? Did I miss it?
@@divinemischief4655I was wondering the same thing. I even went back twice
It was at 7:30 ish. "My son was taken out of my custody..."
@@Cameron_FNot saying you are wrong but, it could be because the mother proved to the court that she could take better care of the child financially, stability, day care (or stay at home mom), etc.
I wish that we knew 100% because my ex wife kidnapped my son for 6 years before I saw him again and he never went back to her...and Social Services was involved and and allowed her to get him back, without even having a place to stay....DSS actually had to meet her while she was trucking with her new boyfriend. They were in an 18 wheeler lol. So, I know how the system can be one-sided and most of the time it's the father that gets "railroaded".
@@BlekSheep_1I am sorry this happened to you and I hope that these services are more enlightened and balanced these days.
That exchange between Attorney White and Judge Simpson was amazing. I geek out on lawyers (a judge is an advanced/expert lawyer, before anyone tries to correct me on that) arguing the law with such decorum and integrity. It's the stuff our system is built on. Much respect to both parties!
I have much respect for Mr Washington taking full responsibility for the dirty test and not trying to deny it and not complaining about the out come. Judge Simpson is very fair.
I was thinking the same thing. Judge Simpson respected it and that he didn't shy away from what would happen if he failed another test.
😑
Exactly. He was also super respectful and didn't talk any more than he had to
What's FAIR is this POS needs to be put IN JAIL, and MAYBE the animal can learn some MANNERS and how to act respectively in court.
Why in the world do you do cocaine if you know you are dropping weekly????? But he did own it, giving him that, and he did show up to test knowing he’d drop dirty. Seems so smart that way, so why did he do the cocaine????
Judge Simpson is the man. Genuinely, I love that guy. I would love to have dinner with him and hear all the stories he has to tell. I bet it would be legendary.
Same here! 👍👏👏
Agreed!
Intern Zenda is a great lawyer in the making. Her skills have grown each time we see her. Ms Zenda taking the lead in a motion hearing says a lot about Ms Kirby’s confidence in her. Can’t wait to see how far she goes in her career.
she is zelous in pursuit for her clients!
A 40 minute video? Blessed by another OSG upload🔥
Judge Simpson, should definitely have a television show
No way, OSG! A couple hours of watching and I'm yelling at my tv!
I haven’t heard “moral turpitude” in a while. 🤔
Just seeing the possible deportation case and man I am impressed with the attorney taking responsibility for the misinformation given to the client. WOW I am amazed. Judge Simpson is in a tough place in regard to accepting the plea or not to. He's so intelligent when it comes to the law. He is my favorite Judge, I think. There are many I like but for so many different reasons and approaches. This was a great vid!!!
Everything you said is great 👍
OSG you are my favorite ❤
Wow Judge is teaching us all something today! 🙏
Hi Squishy. The answer is No way could I be a police officer, attorney, or judge. The stress and BS would cause me to be in jail or fired or both. The patience for ignorance and stupidity they must have is very much higher than I have.
I can’t take when they say, “I dropped dirty” hahahahaha I don’t know why, but it makes me LOL
I hope we get an update on that last case. I know it might be boring for some people but I haven't seen an ineffective counsel hearing in the American court system and I think it would be educational. - especially regarding the 2 sides of that particular issue. As an immigrant myself I'm not unsympathetic, but I also see the court's hesitation in setting a slippery precedent.
Thanks OSG. Stay safe.
Oh, there are lots of *bad* "ineffective counsel" claims that come up, especially from SovCits. Kim Blandino pulled it at least once, after his final court-appointed lawyer somehow didn't manage to pull his well-roasted nuts out of the fire. I've seen a few cases in which lawyers screwed up really badly and failed to do right by their clients, arrogantly insisting to the end that they were in the right. I don't think I've seen a case in which a lawyer voluntarily admitted that they had failed their client and that the client deserved better.
We I do not see that all because when someone plea to a deal it is required they understand the full legal consequences and he was not told what all those consequences are especially the one that he could be deported over what many would call a spat. It really take nothing to be arrest for domestic abuse. A tiny scratch anywhere will do it.
I agree. I'd like to see where this goes also.
OSG, you're always amazing with your clips. Some of these people are truly shocking. Judge Simpson is always fair but you must NEVER lie to him. Thanks for your hard work.
Mr. Filip's victim holds him with 'the claw', just like the Duchess of Sausages grips Prince Haznoballs.
Simpson rocks!
I luv the way that judge Simpson simply stated that there was cocaine found in the defendant's system then waited silently as the defendant set their dumbfounded and seemingly not understanding it was his time to speak.
I was actually waiting for Judge Simpson to ask if he had a medical cocaine card. It seemed the way that convo was going! 😂😂😂
Was the judge there?
Staying silent is an old psychological tactic and still used today. Humans can’t stand the silence and then try to fill the void by talking. Try it at a party or a gathering of people and watch what happens. Of course it may get you branded as a “weirdo “ 😊
@OldWomanfromtheMountains I like to do that. Especially when I know or suspect someone is lying to me.
Unfortunately, a person I love has been lying to me for quite a while. It took a family tragedy for me to realize what this person was/is doing. I have had to put this person on Trust But Verify. And all I have discovered were more lies. The thing is, these are lies that don't need to be told. The truth would be much better. When I confront this person, more lies trying to convince me the other lies were the truth. And if I do the silent part, more lies are added until even this person can't keep track of any excuse they may give. I have known this person since the day I was born. So far, I don't need to expose the lies. I really don't want to have to expose this person. There are other people who have caught on and others like I was for so very long, that believe everything this person states. I don't want them to be hurt by the lies, however this is going into legal matters. I will not lie for her in front of a Judge. Because the truth is more than enough to suit her purposes. I've tried to talk to her about it only to have her lie again. So I do use the silent approach. In Court, I won't.
@@KansasCityScientologyAuditHe could have even gotten the Marijuana card while on probation.
Middleton gets all sorts of crazy. But the judges in Washington get more crazy.
waaay more!
Feigns offense - As a native Washingtonian…I resemble that remark…wait…
Some people would fight with a possum!
Damn they suck!
🤣🤣
🤣
I was urged to be a judge, by lawyers.
I was advised against it by judges.
I can see why!
Been addicted to this and love watching a few every week but I gotta say...REALLY love the rapid fire zoom meetings
I only have one thing to say:
Personal responsibility. 🤦
I enjoy seeing behind the curtain what goes on. I watch the arrest videos when I can find them. I understand the need for plea bargains but, I think sometimes they are a little too lenient.
You want to see bad plea deals? Watch @Mandoo and see the horrendous plea deals the DAs in Louisiana are handing out to child SA perpetrators & how quickly they come up before the parole board. A recent one, a guy got 4 yrs for SAing a little girl beginning when she was 4 yrs old and went on for years. He did 18 mos, & was up before the parole board. A bunch of people come up that have gotten life w/o, sometimes consecutive life w/o. They passed a new law that almost all of the life w/o have to come up before the parole board for a commutation hearing. An outside source should be going in & looking at the DAs down there handing out these deals because they don't want to take anything to trial! 🤬🤬🤬
I've seen people drink mouthwash if they couldn't get any other kind of alcohol. I can believe he drank 10 "non-alcoholic" beers in under an hour if that's what it took to appease his need for alcohol.
Addiction can be a nasty animal 😢
Robitussin and NyQuil too.
Just shows how far honesty goes.
You hit the nail on the head. Your vids are always good. This is specially appropriate.
GREAT WORK. I learn soo much from your videos 😊
Allowing people to wear their baseball caps etc, really needs to stop.
This whole day was a blessing to us court watchers..
In the last case, most people are focused on the wonderfulness of Rita White. I couldn't help but focus on how the defendant's wife is showing every cue with respect to being a DV victim.
Last case very interesting. Have a great weekend.
Thanks, you too!
I saw that deportation case live yesterday, man... I am very curious how this is going to play out!! Definitely keep us updated on that one if its live streamed for us. Im as confused as Judge Simpson is with it for a multitude of reasons. I mean, she is not an immigration attonery, so he would have HAD to have spoken with one prior to taking the plea, its literally required for that to happen, the judge requires that to happen, so to come in and say basically everyone told him the wrong thing is very odd to me.. It seems almost as if he just wasnt listening or assumed that, nahh ill be fime they wont deport me.. idk. Very interested in the resolution of this one. Thanks for the videos Squish!! You are the best!!
He committed DV and resisting officer (he plead guilty), there are consequences to actions. He was facing felony charges. Even if he is allowed to withdraw misdemeanor plea…the state will just refile the original felony charges. Admittedly the victim (wife) may refuse to testify. The assault/resisting will go forward.
IMO - His lawyer saying ineffective assistance isn’t completely accurate. Defense attorney consulted an attorney with immigration specialty and provided that advice to client. Those seem like responsible and appropriate assistance.
The defendant’s fight will be in an immigration hearing.
The defendant has full right to waive any attorney/client privilege. If the communication is to his benefit…why not wave privilege.
thx F&O...i found it interesting and the reason i did the docket...will keep an eye on this!
Send him back. Non negotiable
If you plead guilty, you have to admit to the facts of the case under oath. Won’t they be able to use this against him if he’s able to withdraw the plea?
@@whitelobster1ifyif you withdraw the plea, you get to take that back, so it doesn’t count. It’s sort of like if the police start asking questions before Miranda rights- you can’t use that in court
Ain't it funny how THESE PEOPLE just LOVE their children /miss their children/crying for their children, but you know when their outa jail, THEY COULD GIVE A SH_T LESS!
It is so frustrating that these entitled, law breaking, reprobates have the gall to act so disrespectfully in front of a judge who holds their future in his hands by WEARING A HAT IN COURT! Hey paint licker....take your freakin' hat off in court.
They get their way in the streets by yelling louder than the person they are interacting with. I think it was also in part because of parents not telling their kids ( NO ) from time to time.
I don't get the American obsession with no hats in court. I'm guessing it's a remnant of the old days with big rancher hats and ridiculous tophats.
@@RoughThief It's a sign of respect. The same reason why it's considered rude to wear a hat at a dinner table while dining. The practice insinuates the subtle message of "I know I'm not going anywhere and you have my full attention."
I like how Filip is sitting With his victim 🙄.
And seriously who cares if he gets deported.
If he'd kept his hands to himself.... he wouldn't have this problem
If you are drinking zero alcohol beers, you have a drinking problem.
Especially 30 a day
"My son was tooken away from me, ya honor.." That's not even a word. (rolls eyes)
Maybe on another planet..
Absolutely love Simpson. That lawyer in the pink definitely doesn’t get paid enough. 🤣 She knows and Judge knows the results. Simpson definitely a soldier 🙌💯
Never mind what Judge Simpson has to do every day and it must be very wearing indeed, however your clever editing provides us with much fun. I know that some of this stuff is serious/sad etc.
Wow. Ginther hearing and at the lawyer's own request! Incredible. You find the most interesting hearings! Oct 3 in person means it won't be on YT though. 😞
Judge Simpson does his homework before the hearings.
Judge Simpson is definitely allowing hats and hoods, etc. which makes it awkward for other judges! 😳
He never gets formal like Judge Bryant. Not saying he has to get nuts like she does, but it would be nice if he made people act like they're in court.
Those instructions are at the discretion is the court. He's not obligated to care about what other judge's care about. This is his livelihood. He chooses to live longer, not have high blood pressure and to move cases forward rather than get caught up on things that don't bother him.
But I have seen many defense attorneys who have told people they should take off hats
😂😂😂There is no way Odules caused the positive test!!! 😂😂😂😂😂
Really interesting selection of cases, Squish. Thank you for your continued excellent output. 💖
6:07 middle row center Mushmouth from the Saturday morning cartoon Fat Albert makes an appearance. 14:14 middle bottom Mr. Creosote from Monty Python’s full length motion picture “The Meaning of Life”
😂🤣😂👍, Daylight. You've been around the block a few times, I see.
People don’t understand science and the filtration of alcohol through the liver and kidneys. The judge does as he rules on these cases.
Great compilation! Never a dull moment. ❤❤❤
Ms Apple knew....."in person, judge?"
That Rita White lady is an awesome attorney, shes willing to completely throw herself under the bus for her client
Aside from not knowing the law, that is!
@@lindadeeds5326Immigration law, especially in practice, is a completely different specialty than criminal law. It’s really unfair to judge Ms. White for not knowing that a guilty plea to a misdemeanor could get a green card holder deported. I worked in immigration for years, and I didn’t know that. U.S. immigration law is a big tangled mess thanks to it being run more on policy than statute for the last thirty years.
She's just trying to do the ethical thing here because she honestly believes she made a mistake that shouldn't be allowed to hurt her client. I get that Simpson needs the formal hearing, but I don't get all his annoyance and continued head-shaking. He teaches attorneys, and he should be encouraging the practice of honoring your oath, not acting like she's inconveniencing the Court with her 'petty ethical issues.' I like Simpson, but his general attitude is very pro-prosecution.
@@-HeyLyd- I think he's really just worried about the precedent it could set if it goes a certain way. idk the ins and outs of that but I know certain things in law can have ripple effects.
@@EbonMaster Yes, precedent is important; as I said, the hearing is necessary. But his apparent annoyance at her raising the issue is uncalled for. Set the hearing, hear the evidence, and then decide. What's the point of arguing and head-shaking once you've said you "have no problem" holding the hearing? She'll bring her evidence and it will be whatever it is.
Wow, Judge rarely raises his voice. 😊
Attorney White would drive me nuts. Take a breather lady.
Ooooo you pissed the judge off
Great video! Please keep us posted on the Ginther Hearing case that was quite interesting.
I only drink because other people around me drink. 30 beers per day? And he has a job? Had a job?
yeah...tellin judge ya hang with heavy drinkers...freaking brilliant!!
He claimed 20-30 non-alcoholic beers. But like the Judge pointed out he'd have to drink those in the time it takes to drink 1 beer in order to keep those levels of alcohol in his system. That's friggin ridiculous. He knows he's lying his butt off. 🙄
Am I the only one that expected this clip to start with "LEEEEROY JENKIIIIIINS!!!"?
Great compilation OSG!! I got to see some that I didn’t even see live.
I'm not sure who get the worst defendants Simpson or Desanti
Probably Judge Simpson, though Judge DiSanto gets some real oddball cases as well.
I think every judge has to deal with this type of Cr@p. Judge S & D just allow us to see.
I like the 'Quickies' Squishy. Thanks
Case #5 (con't) - Judge Simpson is so informed on many subjects! Treatment didn't work. 6:00 pm TODAY! Judge doesn't listen to excuses.
WOW !! Oct. 5th is going to be interesting !
I feel like im waiting for Dave Chappelle to just bust out as Judge Simpson!
Much respect for Atty White for owning up to her 'ineffective counsel' issue. When it comes to potentially destroying a family, she stepped up and is accepting her mistake. I hope it worked out for them.
Case #6 - Deportation? Great PD, tells the Judge how to decide. Judge needs ALL info to make a decision. Be careful, defendant may run.
Some really interesting cases OSG❤❤, as always, and sime really satisfying ones too!
Another good one OSG. Very interesting without fireworks. 😁
I did this when I was a mayor of a city of 37,000 LOL
I'm not so sure about PD Apple asking whether the second hearing will be in person at about 19:10 ... that might seem to be a simple, logical, and innocuous question, but what she was really doing [in effect, at least, if not by intention] is making sure that her client can go straight to jail, rather than getting to turn himself in.
I agree. Most defense attorneys, if needing to clarify, would have done so by specifically requesting that the hearing be virtual, to make it perhaps a little less likely that the client would be remanded. That said, she may know that Simpson doesn't really play games on that score, so if he's going to remand, nothing's stopping that.
@@-HeyLyd- Yeah. Or try this: maybe she was worried that, if Simpson were to revote on the spot, if he weren't there in person, he wouldn't have turned himself in and then her client problems would get worse. A defense atty isn't supposed to do something like that, even if she believes that it would be in the clients best interest long term, but maybe she did it anyway, because he might not turn himself in and/or he'd go out and slam 26 O'Douls in an hour again. tee hee (In other words, maybe she was trying to prevent her client from lying some more.)
FYI: Simpson is entirely correct that you can't get to .06% BAC by drinking .5% ABV beers. There are studies on this.
I wonder why the defense lawyers just sit there and let their clients talk on and on and on...
Those "non alcoholic " beers actually have some alcohol in them. It says it right on the can/bottle and box they come in.
20-30 beers at a time? Bull.
I appreciate Attornry Rita White's integrity.
No hats in court people
When I was a teen, I wanted to be a lawyer. A pretend court exercise in social studies cured me of that. Bullet dodged.
The Filip couple need to drop that lawyer ASAP
Yay first to like!! Love your channel OSG!! TY for all your uploads x 🇬🇧
luv it...osg tv!!
Mr Mote is admitting things in court that he SHOULD NOT be speaking about. Sometimes the Defendant is their own worst enemy! “Yes, Your Honor. No, Your Honor”
These frequent fliers that have been in court for years, sure seem to have trouble with the public defenders. The "if you can't afford an attorney, one will be appointed to you" lawyers. Swear it seems like if you PAY for one, you can choose who and how they represent you. If its for free, you are kind of limited.
Yes. As with many things that cost money in our society, that's how it works.
Pay the price when you break the law
Case #3 - DCS does not remove or keep a child from a family unless ordered to protect the child.
Ginther hearings are rough!!
Judge Simpson: we can provide transportation if you have a problem... I don't think you want us to do that.
Lovonty : huh?
Judge Simpson : Nothing 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
He wants to turn himself in later so he can have one last bender
Ms White seems to think that withdrawing the plea resolves the matter ... it doesn't if the plea is withdrawn then the felony charge is re-instated and has to go to trial if found guilty at trial not only MAY he face deportation but also prison time.
Ms White you were not ineffective you were careless and should have known the plea deal would effect his immigration status.
and thats what the judge was trying to tell her but i really couldn't say it out right
Immigration status doesn't have anything to do with it. Defendant enters a plea and suffers the consequences. Why should an illegal wife beater get more consideration than a legal citizen wife beater?
@@tracy7612 Did you even listen to the argument???
The immigration status is very relevant the crime he plead to could mean his deportation it certainly means that he will be refused US citizenship.
RE Why should an illegal wife beater get more consideration than a legal citizen wife beater?
REPLY Can you tell me the difference between a legal wife beater and an illegal wife beater ??????
The non citizen resides in the US at the pleasure of the government and there is a greater onus on them to obey the laws.
They are made well aware of in the green card application.
Nobody gets deported.
1:33 the look on her face when he said "public fender lawfirm"!!!
We're the system and you'll do it our way buddy.
Ive never seen judge Simpson get upset at someone who has a reason to be upset and stressed but, aint a lot he can do about the public defender ignoring his calls.
Drinking O’Douls has O.4% alcohol content.
This is not an excuse for Mr Shannon, but according to FDA & NLEA labeling regulations, a beverage must contain less than 0.5% ABV to be considered non-alcoholic. In general a normally healthy individual can process 1 oz of pure ethanol per hour and not have a change in bac. Assuming a 12 oz can at 0.49 % ABV, a can would have 0.06 oz ethanol/can. So to hit the 1 oz mark you would need to drink 15 - 18 NA beers. The gov’t of Southern Australia published a paper declaring 1 oz of alcohol would change a normal persons BAC by 0.01 - 0.03%. So, it is possible for NA beer to cause changes in BAC, but you really have to be dedicated to get there.
I think they need to make the rules clear about appearing by zoom in court in a letter or via their attorney, this guy is taking the absolute P**s here. Walking around shopping and a hat and hoodie on . They should be slapped with an automatic fine for being dressed inappropriately or get a contempt charge. We have people lounging in bed , slouching in chairs, smoking god knows what sometimes, wandering around the house or outside and the attitude is unbelievable, it may be zoom but it is court
*Naltrexone does not prevent anyone from feeling the effects of alcohol** In studies, it has only shown to decrease cravings and some euphoric effects with alcohol.
But zero and Heineken zero doesn't have alcohol. O' douls has a little but it wouldn't cause a bac that high.
Short answer: No. Longer answer: Hellllllllllllll Noooooooo
Very interesting. OSG making us learn.
Case #5 - didn't retest on bad test, another bad test, and then another, missed test, and then another bad test? Does he think the Court is ignorant? See you at 3:00 o'clock, get affairs in order.
37:20 if anything, surely its the 1st immigration lawyer who was ineffective not the lawyer requesting the hearing. The lawyer we saw went over & above trying to protect her client.
I know they are in trouble and in court, but i do feel bad for defendants that have yet to see their PD. Just my opinion
Mr. Shannon just admit you got a big drinking problem
Nobody ever takes their hats off unless specifically asked to do so. Zoom court is treated way too casually.
Mr. Shannon 100% was butt-chugging bud zero. Just needed more time again.
Re the Filip case: it seemed to me the judge was saying he needed more info. The info exists but is protected by attorney /client confidentiality which the attorney said she was not prepared to waive. Couldn't Mr. Filip agree to waive confidentiality in regards to the immigration advice to get past the judge's concerns?