You are an amazing teacher. I have learned and understood more with watching an hour of your videos than in the last 12 hours of lecture with my current physics professor. I truly appreciate how you take the time to breakdown every aspect of what you're teaching. I was considering dropping my class today, but now that i know you and your videos exist i am much more hopefully that i can understand and be successful in this class.
I’ve decided to completely change what my future will look like. I was going to be a teacher because I thought it was an easy way into the world, doesn’t require too much for an incompetent being like myself. Then I realized that’s not true in the slightest. I always wanted to be a scientist, just never knew if I could do it. These videos are preparing me before I enroll in classes so I don’t fall on my ass. Thank you for putting these extremely informative lessons on here for free so people like myself can be further educated and equipped for the big classes.
I am so hooked on these videos, that even when I can view them for free on RUclips, I am still purchasing your DVD out of respect. I spent about $200 on the statistic videos.
@@MathAndScience THE ULTIMATE, TOP DOWN, AND CLEAR MATHEMATICAL PROOF REGARDING THE FACT THAT E=MC2 IS F=MA: Time dilation ultimately proves ON BALANCE that E=mc2 IS F=ma, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Time is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity ON BALANCE. Gravity is ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. Great !!!! QUANTUM GRAVITY !!!! E=MC2 IS F=ma. This NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, AND DESCRIBES what is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE. What are the EARTH/ground AND the SUN are CLEARLY E=MC2 AND F=ma IN BALANCE. Very importantly, outer "space" involves full inertia; AND it is fully invisible AND black. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. GRAVITATIONAL force/ENERGY IS proportional to (or BALANCED with/as) inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand. It does ALL CLEARLY make perfect sense. GOT IT !!!! THE SKY is BLUE, AND THE EARTH is ALSO BLUE. Great !!! Now, think about the man who IS standing on what is THE EARTH/ground. Perfect !!!! By Frank DiMeglio
These videos are saving my ass. My online physics instructor is Ethiopian and his accent makes learning even harder. Granted, I’m taking physics over the winter semester so I’ve got one month to digest the material. Supplementing his lecture with your lecture is helping so much. Thank you!!!!
I regret to catch up with you late.you are really my type of teacher.you explained every ingrediants vividly.what more can we expect from you. You give everything what you have.thank you so much Sir.looking forward for so many more videos. may God bless you Sir
Good teacher. Very clear explanations make things seem simple. You have a clear procedure also. Great my teachers at school always managed to confuse me for some reason and I would evntually lose focus trying to undertsand their jumbled explanations such problems. Some teachers seem to take a delight in mkaing simple things seem difficult. Maybe its an ego thing. I will watch some more.
in case acceleration wasn't constant ,i would able to use those equations to solve this problem?Is this problem "built" like that so it refers to only constant acceleration? thank you proffesor.
My goodness , he puts things in terms to understand this in a way that doesn't make me want to pull my hair out. Im currently in a spec program..an u NEED to pass physics to move on..an its taught by a guy who's 1st language isn't english..an every student speaks fluent english. He's up on the board..correcting himself constantly, an is jus terrible at delivering this info. Thank goodness for the Tube.
I decided to do the math as well, and I found why. When you times the numerators I get 120,000, and when I times the denominators together I get 360. Which if you divided the problem with just that you would get 333.33. However, there's one more step on which he did before dividing. He cross eliminated the zeros in the fraction "120,000/360" to get "12,000/36." Which would give you 33.33.
Sir how about deceleration? A cyclist is running her bicycle at 7.00 m/s when she spotted a cat 14.0 m/s away. What is the minimum magnitude of deceleration needed to prevent her bike from hitting the cat? How much time does she need to come to full stop if she reduces her speed with this minimum deceleration?
why cant we do speed = distance x time to find the time and then use 2nd eq of motion to calculate the acceleration. it gives different ans..why is it so
I think there is a case for video lessons for all students with the same teacher who has the cleaest explanations. Why not? We have the technology. A poor teacher is a dangerous thing. All you have to ensure is that nobody disrupts the prenetation, but it could be rewound of course and rewatched by individual students who wish to do so at home.
Sir, we know that acceleration be variable in real world. As you have worked in NASA, how would you solve a problem on motion of rocket with variable acceleration?
That is a great question. If your motion has acceleration that is changing, then you must use calculus to solve it, so it is beyond the scope of an introductory physics class. Later in engineering and science studies you will take a course called engineering mechanics dynamics. Or if pure physics it will just be called classical mechanics. In there will be a treatment of motion with variable acceleration. It is not easy to solve those problems and calculus must be used in all but the most simple cases. Thank you!
finally someone who understands students point of view and explains everything
You are an amazing teacher. I have learned and understood more with watching an hour of your videos than in the last 12 hours of lecture with my current physics professor. I truly appreciate how you take the time to breakdown every aspect of what you're teaching. I was considering dropping my class today, but now that i know you and your videos exist i am much more hopefully that i can understand and be successful in this class.
Thank you so much for the comment Amanda! Hang in there and keep at it. Good luck in your studies!
I’ve decided to completely change what my future will look like. I was going to be a teacher because I thought it was an easy way into the world, doesn’t require too much for an incompetent being like myself. Then I realized that’s not true in the slightest. I always wanted to be a scientist, just never knew if I could do it. These videos are preparing me before I enroll in classes so I don’t fall on my ass. Thank you for putting these extremely informative lessons on here for free so people like myself can be further educated and equipped for the big classes.
You are the best professor on earth !!! Just amazing !
I am so hooked on these videos, that even when I can view them for free on RUclips, I am still purchasing your DVD out of respect. I spent about $200 on the statistic videos.
Thank you so much! Good luck in your studies!
same here except for physics, this man is godlike
@@MathAndScience THE ULTIMATE, TOP DOWN, AND CLEAR MATHEMATICAL PROOF REGARDING THE FACT THAT E=MC2 IS F=MA:
Time dilation ultimately proves ON BALANCE that E=mc2 IS F=ma, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Time is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity ON BALANCE. Gravity is ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy.
Great !!!! QUANTUM GRAVITY !!!! E=MC2 IS F=ma. This NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, AND DESCRIBES what is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE. What are the EARTH/ground AND the SUN are CLEARLY E=MC2 AND F=ma IN BALANCE. Very importantly, outer "space" involves full inertia; AND it is fully invisible AND black. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. GRAVITATIONAL force/ENERGY IS proportional to (or BALANCED with/as) inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand. It does ALL CLEARLY make perfect sense. GOT IT !!!! THE SKY is BLUE, AND THE EARTH is ALSO BLUE. Great !!! Now, think about the man who IS standing on what is THE EARTH/ground. Perfect !!!!
By Frank DiMeglio
I really appreciate your teaching style it's refreshing
These videos are saving my ass. My online physics instructor is Ethiopian and his accent makes learning even harder. Granted, I’m taking physics over the winter semester so I’ve got one month to digest the material. Supplementing his lecture with your lecture is helping so much.
Thank you!!!!
seriously the only teacher i was able to understand. THANK YOU!!!!!
I regret to catch up with you late.you are really my type of teacher.you explained every ingrediants vividly.what more can we expect from you. You give everything what you have.thank you so much Sir.looking forward for so many more videos. may God bless you Sir
Good teacher. Very clear explanations make things seem simple. You have a clear procedure also. Great my teachers at school always managed to confuse me for some reason and I would evntually lose focus trying to undertsand their jumbled explanations such problems. Some teachers seem to take a delight in mkaing simple things seem difficult. Maybe its an ego thing. I will watch some more.
in case acceleration wasn't constant ,i would able to use those equations to solve this problem?Is this problem "built" like that so it refers to only constant acceleration? thank you proffesor.
I'm watching this in 2020 and still, it's much easier to understand than what my online lecturer is teaching me XD
Awesome!
Your videos are amazing, thank you
Thank you very much. its very useful and it helped me a lot!!
thanks!!
Do you cover physics using Calculus on your website?
really amazing !! thank you very much.
Nice learning from you sir.
sir i really appreciate your teachin💙💙 Just Love u💕💕💕
My goodness , he puts things in terms to understand this in a way that doesn't make me want to pull my hair out. Im currently in a spec program..an u NEED to pass physics to move on..an its taught by a guy who's 1st language isn't english..an every student speaks fluent english. He's up on the board..correcting himself constantly, an is jus terrible at delivering this info. Thank goodness for the Tube.
what about deltax=(vi+v/2).t
isnt it a motion with constant accel equation, bcuz we've. got 4 equations and there are 3 in the video
like really thank u for everything but i have question its kinda silly how did we get 33,3mls please answer soon as possible thank u
I decided to do the math as well, and I found why. When you times the numerators I get 120,000, and when I times the denominators together I get 360. Which if you divided the problem with just that you would get 333.33. However, there's one more step on which he did before dividing. He cross eliminated the zeros in the fraction "120,000/360" to get "12,000/36." Which would give you 33.33.
@@amye.9824 60x60 is 3600
120,000/3600=33.33
Sir how about deceleration? A cyclist is running her bicycle at 7.00 m/s when she spotted a cat 14.0 m/s away. What is the minimum magnitude of deceleration needed to prevent her bike from hitting the cat? How much time does she need to come to full stop if she reduces her speed with this minimum deceleration?
why cant we do speed = distance x time to find the time and then use 2nd eq of motion to calculate the acceleration. it gives different ans..why is it so
THANK YOU ONCE AGAIN !
excellent..thank you!
love this video!!!
THANK YOU... SIR...!!!
No advertisement ....that's great
How did you get 207.79? isnt 206.90?
Thanks so much
thanks dude im probably not gonna do too well butyou seem chill
i did good 36/40
thanks professor
I think there is a case for video lessons for all students with the same teacher who has the cleaest explanations. Why not? We have the technology. A poor teacher is a dangerous thing. All you have to ensure is that nobody disrupts the prenetation, but it could be rewound of course and rewatched by individual students who wish to do so at home.
good job
I love You dude ❤
Sir, we know that acceleration be variable in real world. As you have worked in NASA, how would you solve a problem on motion of rocket with variable acceleration?
That is a great question. If your motion has acceleration that is changing, then you must use calculus to solve it, so it is beyond the scope of an introductory physics class. Later in engineering and science studies you will take a course called engineering mechanics dynamics. Or if pure physics it will just be called classical mechanics. In there will be a treatment of motion with variable acceleration. It is not easy to solve those problems and calculus must be used in all but the most simple cases. Thank you!
@@MathAndScience Can you give me a link where I can find solutions to such question. I am a college student undergrad in EE. Thanks for replying Sir.
You only needed the first 2 equations in fact, for the given problem, answer being straight a = 0.5 * (v^2/x)
There are many ways to solve a problem!
thanks sir
ok sir
Thanks!
This dude.....is a GOOD fucking teacher🙏
better then my physics teacher
in india, we did it in 7th grade
👳🏿
ily
could you not have written small and gotten everything on one board; following the tracking camera was a detraction. thank you
❤❤❤