@@JakubRusinek I think that's a bug because of the release is Beta-Channel yet. Same problem was with the visualization in Traffic-Monitor. It simply showed nothing. But since 4.0beta9 this works fine now. Improvements are coming step-by-step 😉
This is an epic game changer. Whilst highly productive, the v3 UI was very 1990s. A refreshed UI and native Win/Mac/Linux and of course modern patterns like dark mode is highly appreciated
Did you test it or just watched the video? The UI got really worse, there is no real change, just the contrast disappeared and makes it very difficult to navigate. This is not about the UI, it's about platform compatibility, the UI part is only marketing, but it got worse than it was. Hopefully in 4-5 years we can expect something like Unify, but I'm not sure. Functionality is great, UX is crap.
Some things are very nice, some things are not. Still in beta so there's still hope :) - removal of tabs is not senseful, now you need to click twice to navigate - closing windows with Esc is not possible - the user interface no longer feels as crisp and fast as v3
@@JakubRusinek I can't copy a firewall rule anymore... It really looks like a window wrapper of the very bad WEB interface of the router i hate so much...
It looks a lot nicer. Though for the below reasons we should be striving for function over design, seems a little bit of step backwards. I realise it's a beta, I'm hoping to put forward my suggestions. :) 1. Can the padding around each line in the table be reduced? There's a lot less information on the screen. 2. Bring back Detailed View. 3. There's a small bit of padding at the bottom of any table, looks a bit odd.
1. выпадающее меню вместо вкладок? очень не удобно скорость переключения намного меньше. 2. в графиках скорости нельзя навести мышкой и увидеть скорость в моменте. 3. в списке сохранённых подключений нет групп . 4. цвета темного режима очень не удобны. нигде таких не видел. 5. дерево интерфейсов очень необходимо 6. пропали кнопки управления безопасным режимом
Excellent work Mikrotik team. WinBox 4 is surprisingly good for a beta. I am sure with the feedback provided by your passionate customer community that Mikrotik will be able to quickly turn this into a GA release.
Love it, however, need to bring back tabs... so much scrolling and expanding - multiple actions where only one was needed before - other than that a huge round of applause!
@@petervandebeek5980 I second that. No need to burden with those 2.5G when 10G is so cheap... Not only that, better to fan-out those 2.5G to a switch if people absolutely want 2.5G...
I've already downloaded it a couple of days ago, and I'm sticking with WinBox3 running under Wine. The interface in WB4 is familiar, but different enough to be holding me back at what I'm trying to do. The router stats were better at the top of the window. Also, hitting Esc won't close a window (at least on a Mac).
@@pardismobile I know, but I'm used to Esc from WinBox 3. See, this is one of the small adjustments that drive you crazy in the new version. Imagine if Microsoft would change Alt + F4 to something completely different in Windows 12.
Finally! I can't wait for the first stable release! :) There are some bugs and strange things in the linux version (cannot close inner window with esc, cannot start/stop ping with enter), but I believe these will be fixed. Great job anyway :)
off to a good start ... but still refinement and polishing way ahead on the journey great work for a first beta and eager to see the progress here one real killer point - this think is FAST!
UX is not stellar, I have quite a few issues with the new interface * Functions previously available on the toolbar and buttons on the right site are now on random places allover the window. * The scroll-down list instead of the tab bar does not help in cases you need to switch around between multiple views (like ospf/bgp). * The possibility to open multiple windows makes a mess on smaller screens. * Also the addresbook view is way less usable than in the Winbox 3. * And I miss the quick search
Damn guys! All my friends from industry always brag about You do things different from the rest of the network equipment manufacturers. For me it is ok! It is nice to have some diversity here! Keep it up! That Winbox upgrade took a while... XD
Finally, this is a very good upgrade, it looks cool! 💪 I am very happy to see that MikroTik has recently overcome its traditional conservatism in recent times.
Oh WOW, seems it's true... good work Mikrotik! I do not know how many UI changes you planned and what you planned at all for the future, But I Want To Believe that UI will be more User Friendly in the future, and will be more smarter than it was in the old version, sorry guys but it could be more better, I'm not disappointed 'couse it just a beta and (I still believe) but something says me that UI will be not as good as should be or people expect, in one year (my guess) we will see stable release but will it be with good UI? Let's see... New Winbox it's a good project (I guess) but needs a good Project Manager (in my opinion) so hire me and it will be way more better than it is now and will be after a year! (I'm just sharing my opinion)
On prettiness, v4 is better than v3. On usability, v4 is much worst than v3. It always depend of who work on it and if they prioritize form over function.
I love that there is a native Linux version... But because of the UI I see so far, I won't be using it ! The Saved Address list is not very friendly to find item like it was in the previous version, and it waste a lot of screen space. Once logged in, I must say I got used to like the tabs much better than having collapsible items on a single list. I really despise the 'button' action on the right, which I think actual visual button to the right we had before is much better, as it add a level of risk as these cause actions, which some action might mean losing the connection completely, which is probably why the Disable and Enable option is not present, as it probably caused issues already. Spacing between item are too large, text box are to high. The top Status of interface feel like button that are disabled or enabled, not actual status. In the items list, there the enable and disable button at the bottom, which really doesn't feel like it should be there. I think the v3 top options felt a lot more natural position and faster to use. The rightclick also lack a lot of options that v3 provided. Also the UI is much slower than the old version. I double click on an interface on my home router and it instant open with old winbox, where the new winbox take nearly a second to display the new open window. There is a few small bug, like in a interface you cannot shift select multiple item using the arrow key, you need to click with the mouse... But those are easily fix. But most of the new UI change, which my comment won't probably do anything, is what I think it will make v4 less good than v3. Just comparing the space efficiency of v3 vs v4 make v3 my goto for now. I personally don't care if something is pretty, I want something that is usable, fast and safe to use. v4 fail to all 3 in my view so far versus v3.
I'm with you... I manage many devices and this new version looses on all things important to be fast and efficient. The new Winbox seems to be a "window wrapper" of the Router's very bad WEB interface. We loose tab, we loose "copy" function, we loose right click, etc. I have to stick to my WINE Winbox... I was hoping to get a proper Linux version for such a ong time as i use Linux exclusively for the last 15+ years... Is it still one of those "bad UI" guys who mess around and forget about the ones who actually use the software? I don't know but for me, it's a huge deception if it stays like this... I manage network devices since 1992 and for me, Winbox v3 was the best UI when i compare to all the orhers i know: Cisco, HP/HPE, Fortinet, etc. With this version, it's a regression...
I would normally bash any software vendor that takes this long to port their app to other systems but I'm so happy right now that I'll give you a pass! 😂 I can have dark mode in Linux and that's all I care!
Thanks for this update tried immediately. Design is very good and dark mode!!! Need to use it for a while to see if it convenient. Implement feedback in beta Winboxes and use AI to quickly analyze what needs to be improved.
Only reason i was ignoring MikroTik devices was no Winbox Linux version... like cmon, company that sells computer network hardware that is running Linux has management software only for windows? So i'm glad you have finally fixed this, but took you a while...
Suggestion: Maybe when you open a window inside the workspace, open it in the middle of the screen, not in the top left corner. It's a bit confusing from a contrast point of view when you try to move the workspace window
i can't see which interface the vlans belong to on the interface tab. in old winbox when we open interface tab, we can clearly see the list of vlans that correspond to its interface
Omg finally. Maybe I can actually use it in production without scratching my head and trying to figure it out where everything is again. Simplify it all!
Yes it looks nicer but is unsubale for me. No way how to choose groups of Saved MK. Tabs removed so everytime i need to do antother click to change tab. And worst thing interfaces and Vlan are not grouped in tree view so i need to switch to Vlan tab or open every Vlan to look on what interface they are. I just hope we will still have old version of winbox supported
Just a slight "meh". It's a statically linked QT binary with whoppin 50 MB size, 20x times larger than Winbox 3.x - is this "optimized" yet? And the cursor lags sometimes when quickly hovering over e.g. menu items on Windows - likely some GPU/3D accel problem (RTX3800).. a lot of optimization needed..
I really don't care for a 50M binary when it doesn't rely on any external library, on the contrary... The worst problem is not there. The wrapping of the router's very bad WEB interface in Winbox Windows, lacking, for example, copy functionality of a firewall rule, missing tabs, etc is much worst...
From all the software i was running in wine, winbox seemed to be the least problematic one (aside from some weird copypasting behaviour). But having native linux winbox is a great change!
Awesome I feel like waiting for the native Mac version since forever, how nice. Overall working quite good, I just found an issue to move files into the flash folder wich is needed on some smaller devices to not loose them after power recycle or reboot. How can I do this on WinBox 4 for Mac? Drag and Drop doesn't work??
i like the dark mode i know it still in beta the problem is you can not add a winbox addresses of previous save unlike on winbox 3 you can restore your previous save winbox addresses
I waited for this Linux version for ages! I use Linux exclusively for the last 15 years so i was running Winbox with Wine. I just downloaded Winbox for Linux and apart from the new "look", it is a huge deception. I hope i'm missing something like Winbox' config or something else... The interface seems to use / wrap the very bad WEB interface (that i hate so much) of the router in the new Winbox... What i mean is, as an example, when in /firewall/filter rules/, i can't copy a rule, i don't have tabs, etc. Is it really like this or do i have to configure something to get the same level of functionality like my current v3.14 ??
On Kubuntu 24.04 Neighbors list is empty, but when type address in field "Connect to" it's connected. On Windows 10 Pro 22H2 when connecting to empty router (after reset with no configuration) and no password set - getting authentification error. Writing here because of have no rights to post on forum.
one question, what changed there that Winbox is now 52 megabytes. I understand that it's not much, but the 3rd weighs 2 megabytes and works faster, and sometimes pulling an extra megabyte through gprs is painful
Copy the old files to the new location. '/Users/YOUR_USER_NAME/Library/Application Support/MikroTik/WinBox to '~/Library/Application Support/MikroTik/WinBox
![Megan Thee Stallion - Mamushi (Remix) [feat. TWICE] [Official Audio]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/5c0_u9PsrsQ/mqdefault.jpg)
From 2017 to 2024, No need for Wine on my GUN/Linux machine to run Winbox. Thank you very much, it's gorgeous 😍
Awesome! Finally a native Mac version. Very welcome to see!
Finally a native Linux version! Looks awesome.
The removal of tabs is unfortunatly quite the downgrade in usability and overview :(
More important is adding the ability to move firewall rules in the new winbox!!!
@@JakubRusinek I think that's a bug because of the release is Beta-Channel yet. Same problem was with the visualization in Traffic-Monitor. It simply showed nothing. But since 4.0beta9 this works fine now. Improvements are coming step-by-step 😉
Finally a native TempleOS version! Looks awesome.
This is an epic game changer. Whilst highly productive, the v3 UI was very 1990s. A refreshed UI and native Win/Mac/Linux and of course modern patterns like dark mode is highly appreciated
I liked the 90s. I just wanted a native linux version :)
Did you test it or just watched the video? The UI got really worse, there is no real change, just the contrast disappeared and makes it very difficult to navigate. This is not about the UI, it's about platform compatibility, the UI part is only marketing, but it got worse than it was. Hopefully in 4-5 years we can expect something like Unify, but I'm not sure. Functionality is great, UX is crap.
On arch working properly. Thx mikrotik.
we got winbox on mac before gta 6
Thx for your hard work Mikrotik. I really appreciate it ❤.
Brilliant, well done! Can't wait to start using it. You guys are awesome!
Some things are very nice, some things are not. Still in beta so there's still hope :)
- removal of tabs is not senseful, now you need to click twice to navigate
- closing windows with Esc is not possible
- the user interface no longer feels as crisp and fast as v3
More important is adding the ability to move firewall rules in the new winbox!!!
@@JakubRusinek I can't copy a firewall rule anymore... It really looks like a window wrapper of the very bad WEB interface of the router i hate so much...
I literally installed winbox with wine on my Linux laptop like 4h before you upload this video. Damn ! I'm really happy with all the new features !
Thank you, Lord! Finally, a native Winbox for Mac has been released. And with a dark theme too! THANKS A LOT, MIKROTIK!!!
It looks a lot nicer. Though for the below reasons we should be striving for function over design, seems a little bit of step backwards. I realise it's a beta, I'm hoping to put forward my suggestions. :)
1. Can the padding around each line in the table be reduced? There's a lot less information on the screen.
2. Bring back Detailed View.
3. There's a small bit of padding at the bottom of any table, looks a bit odd.
1. выпадающее меню вместо вкладок? очень не удобно скорость переключения намного меньше.
2. в графиках скорости нельзя навести мышкой и увидеть скорость в моменте.
3. в списке сохранённых подключений нет групп .
4. цвета темного режима очень не удобны. нигде таких не видел.
5. дерево интерфейсов очень необходимо
6. пропали кнопки управления безопасным режимом
Wow! big thank to you MT. Finally can use native client on Apple Silicon Mac without 3rd party softwares.
Already installed and it’s just great! Thank you guys! Great work!
Congratulations Mikrotik. This was a huge undertaking.👏
Excellent work Mikrotik team.
WinBox 4 is surprisingly good for a beta. I am sure with the feedback provided by your passionate customer community that Mikrotik will be able to quickly turn this into a GA release.
Yep!! It is done!! And we do not need to wait for another 15 years (c) Thanks, Mikrotik team, a lot for upgrade and native ones!!
Love it, however, need to bring back tabs... so much scrolling and expanding - multiple actions where only one was needed before - other than that a huge round of applause!
FINALLY YOU GUYS DID IT
THANKS FOR DARK MODE 🙏 ♥️♥️♥️
(But the pain from white mode all these years still remains )
We need a new RB5009 router with wifi6/7 and an all-port 2.5Gbe configuration.
For WiFi 6 we need user friendly setup for bridge mode. It’s still a big problem. 😢
WiFi 7 only please. Beyond
No, an RB5009 with two SFP+ ports. I need uplink and downlink SFP+ these days. And a few ethernet are enough.
@@petervandebeek5980 I second that. No need to burden with those 2.5G when 10G is so cheap... Not only that, better to fan-out those 2.5G to a switch if people absolutely want 2.5G...
I've already downloaded it a couple of days ago, and I'm sticking with WinBox3 running under Wine. The interface in WB4 is familiar, but different enough to be holding me back at what I'm trying to do. The router stats were better at the top of the window. Also, hitting Esc won't close a window (at least on a Mac).
CMD+W close window on mac
@@pardismobile I know, but I'm used to Esc from WinBox 3. See, this is one of the small adjustments that drive you crazy in the new version. Imagine if Microsoft would change Alt + F4 to something completely different in Windows 12.
You had me at Dark Mode
You had me at Dark Mode!
Voting for having Tabs navigation instead of (along with) Dropdowns for sections windows.
Thank you, MikroTik - tabs are back in beta 6! Voting to Have MikroTik as a Network Solution!
Finally! I can't wait for the first stable release! :) There are some bugs and strange things in the linux version (cannot close inner window with esc, cannot start/stop ping with enter), but I believe these will be fixed. Great job anyway :)
in winbox4 new shortcut is ctrl+w like any other software
@@mikrotik More important is adding the ability to move firewall rules in the new winbox!!!
Excellent!! Congrats to the team!
off to a good start ... but still refinement and polishing way ahead on the journey
great work for a first beta and eager to see the progress here
one real killer point - this think is FAST!
This is awesome
Now we need a native The Dude client for Linux and Mac
this is a BETA, we need a full functionality for winbox.Nobody wanted new interface, we want crossplatformed app
It's good, but please return tabs back!!! These drop down menus and groups are evil.
You guys read my mind, I was about to send an email asking for a Linux version. Thank you so much.
UX is not stellar, I have quite a few issues with the new interface
* Functions previously available on the toolbar and buttons on the right site are now on random places allover the window.
* The scroll-down list instead of the tab bar does not help in cases you need to switch around between multiple views (like ospf/bgp).
* The possibility to open multiple windows makes a mess on smaller screens.
* Also the addresbook view is way less usable than in the Winbox 3.
* And I miss the quick search
...and no copy function for (as an example) firewall rules
❤ it is the time to have newer version of winbox
Damn guys! All my friends from industry always brag about You do things different from the rest of the network equipment manufacturers.
For me it is ok! It is nice to have some diversity here! Keep it up! That Winbox upgrade took a while... XD
Thank you so much for the native Linux winbox, this is epic!
Finally, this is a very good upgrade, it looks cool! 💪 I am very happy to see that MikroTik has recently overcome its traditional conservatism in recent times.
Oh WOW, seems it's true... good work Mikrotik! I do not know how many UI changes you planned and what you planned at all for the future, But I Want To Believe that UI will be more User Friendly in the future, and will be more smarter than it was in the old version, sorry guys but it could be more better, I'm not disappointed 'couse it just a beta and (I still believe) but something says me that UI will be not as good as should be or people expect, in one year (my guess) we will see stable release but will it be with good UI? Let's see... New Winbox it's a good project (I guess) but needs a good Project Manager (in my opinion) so hire me and it will be way more better than it is now and will be after a year! (I'm just sharing my opinion)
On prettiness, v4 is better than v3. On usability, v4 is much worst than v3. It always depend of who work on it and if they prioritize form over function.
I love that there is a native Linux version... But because of the UI I see so far, I won't be using it ! The Saved Address list is not very friendly to find item like it was in the previous version, and it waste a lot of screen space. Once logged in, I must say I got used to like the tabs much better than having collapsible items on a single list. I really despise the 'button' action on the right, which I think actual visual button to the right we had before is much better, as it add a level of risk as these cause actions, which some action might mean losing the connection completely, which is probably why the Disable and Enable option is not present, as it probably caused issues already. Spacing between item are too large, text box are to high. The top Status of interface feel like button that are disabled or enabled, not actual status. In the items list, there the enable and disable button at the bottom, which really doesn't feel like it should be there. I think the v3 top options felt a lot more natural position and faster to use. The rightclick also lack a lot of options that v3 provided.
Also the UI is much slower than the old version. I double click on an interface on my home router and it instant open with old winbox, where the new winbox take nearly a second to display the new open window.
There is a few small bug, like in a interface you cannot shift select multiple item using the arrow key, you need to click with the mouse... But those are easily fix. But most of the new UI change, which my comment won't probably do anything, is what I think it will make v4 less good than v3. Just comparing the space efficiency of v3 vs v4 make v3 my goto for now. I personally don't care if something is pretty, I want something that is usable, fast and safe to use. v4 fail to all 3 in my view so far versus v3.
I'm with you... I manage many devices and this new version looses on all things important to be fast and efficient. The new Winbox seems to be a "window wrapper" of the Router's very bad WEB interface. We loose tab, we loose "copy" function, we loose right click, etc. I have to stick to my WINE Winbox... I was hoping to get a proper Linux version for such a ong time as i use Linux exclusively for the last 15+ years... Is it still one of those "bad UI" guys who mess around and forget about the ones who actually use the software? I don't know but for me, it's a huge deception if it stays like this... I manage network devices since 1992 and for me, Winbox v3 was the best UI when i compare to all the orhers i know: Cisco, HP/HPE, Fortinet, etc. With this version, it's a regression...
I would normally bash any software vendor that takes this long to port their app to other systems but I'm so happy right now that I'll give you a pass! 😂 I can have dark mode in Linux and that's all I care!
Looks better. Usability is significantly worsen by several bad interface decisions.
Sweeeet!! Native Linux version! Looks great!!
Finally. Looks quite pleasing.
Yey! My Linux Mint laptop is running winbox4 nicely. What a lovely day!
i test it's very good but where is safe mode button and undo/redo button???
Finally! Amazing news. Thank you!
Thanks for this update tried immediately. Design is very good and dark mode!!! Need to use it for a while to see if it convenient. Implement feedback in beta Winboxes and use AI to quickly analyze what needs to be improved.
Only reason i was ignoring MikroTik devices was no Winbox Linux version... like cmon, company that sells computer network hardware that is running Linux has management software only for windows? So i'm glad you have finally fixed this, but took you a while...
Great! Now please add tab'd instead of drop-down menu's, please. 👍🏻
just tried it ! love it!!! :)
Suggestion: Maybe when you open a window inside the workspace, open it in the middle of the screen, not in the top left corner. It's a bit confusing from a contrast point of view when you try to move the workspace window
Linux users: thank you.
Finally I can run LinBox!
The macOS version is missing a link to the ~/Applications location.
Currently there is a lot missing but they have confirmed they will start adding the missing features soon!
i can't see which interface the vlans belong to on the interface tab. in old winbox when we open interface tab, we can clearly see the list of vlans that correspond to its interface
True, we need the tree view back in interfaces so we can identify vlans easily. Also in Queues, it is hard to see the parents
Thank you MikroTik!
Omg finally.
Maybe I can actually use it in production without scratching my head and trying to figure it out where everything is again. Simplify it all!
Good for compatibility with Linux and Mac, but there is much less information on the screen and removing tabs is a degradation of usability.
Also the colors are pale and not very visible.
Yes it looks nicer but is unsubale for me. No way how to choose groups of Saved MK. Tabs removed so everytime i need to do antother click to change tab. And worst thing interfaces and Vlan are not grouped in tree view so i need to switch to Vlan tab or open every Vlan to look on what interface they are. I just hope we will still have old version of winbox supported
Looks fresh! And scaleable interface is a kille feature for me ))).
IMPORTANT! Please add the ability to move firewall rules in the new winbox!!!
I dont understand. I can move the rules up and down like always. What do you mean?
Just a slight "meh". It's a statically linked QT binary with whoppin 50 MB size, 20x times larger than Winbox 3.x - is this "optimized" yet? And the cursor lags sometimes when quickly hovering over e.g. menu items on Windows - likely some GPU/3D accel problem (RTX3800).. a lot of optimization needed..
We should thank that this is not a popular "electron" JS monster, eating 1 gig of ram. Application is very small for 2024 :)
I really don't care for a 50M binary when it doesn't rely on any external library, on the contrary... The worst problem is not there. The wrapping of the router's very bad WEB interface in Winbox Windows, lacking, for example, copy functionality of a firewall rule, missing tabs, etc is much worst...
Game changer, thank you!
Better late than never! But it sure took its time!
From all the software i was running in wine, winbox seemed to be the least problematic one (aside from some weird copypasting behaviour). But having native linux winbox is a great change!
Have to proof if its not the first of April.... now i had to upgrade!
Time to add tab organizer, stacked, mosaic, maximized, horizontal, vertical... there are so many options...
I like new winbox, native Mac app is very comfy
Once more the Sith will rule the galaxy!
beta5 with return tab based interace is the best beta till release! ^^
It's alredy released and has tabs
Awesome I feel like waiting for the native Mac version since forever, how nice. Overall working quite good, I just found an issue to move files into the flash folder wich is needed on some smaller devices to not loose them after power recycle or reboot. How can I do this on WinBox 4 for Mac? Drag and Drop doesn't work??
de lujo.... muchas gracias... ahora probarlo en Mac M1😎
i like the dark mode i know it still in beta the problem is you can not add a winbox addresses of previous save unlike on winbox 3 you can restore your previous save winbox addresses
Great for Ubuntu desktop. This is what we wait for long ....
export-import of existing saved items and master password for protect bookmarks still missing, it would be great to see in version 4
Native Linux?! LETS GO!!!
edit* ALSO DARK MODE!!!
Problem with Cyrillic alphabet in DHCP Leases comments
Good work guys!
I waited for this Linux version for ages! I use Linux exclusively for the last 15 years so i was running Winbox with Wine. I just downloaded Winbox for Linux and apart from the new "look", it is a huge deception. I hope i'm missing something like Winbox' config or something else... The interface seems to use / wrap the very bad WEB interface (that i hate so much) of the router in the new Winbox... What i mean is, as an example, when in /firewall/filter rules/, i can't copy a rule, i don't have tabs, etc. Is it really like this or do i have to configure something to get the same level of functionality like my current v3.14 ??
Yes！！！！！！！！！！！！！！ finally！！ the new gen Winbox is coming
Thanks Mikrotik Team
YOOOOOOOOOOOO I am really excited to try winbox version 4 !!!
Cross-platform tool - it's cool. May be you should change the name, because mac_winbox and linux_winbox sound weird:)
Thank you!
We need tree-like view in interfaces and queues, its is hard to identify what belongs to what
Oh thank Christ I can get rid of wine.
Ok, but do you have something similar to UniFi manage software? It look really cool. When something similar will be available for Mikrotik?
nice! thx for your work!
Native Linux build? Awesome 👍
On Kubuntu 24.04 Neighbors list is empty, but when type address in field "Connect to" it's connected. On Windows 10 Pro 22H2 when connecting to empty router (after reset with no configuration) and no password set - getting authentification error. Writing here because of have no rights to post on forum.
no more Groups in Winbox???
Thank you for the Linux version.
Awesome! It's crazy!
Should be called LinBox now :D
Or MacBox, as you want
Alhamdulilha that's good for all users.
I love it!
I love your video humor, but remember to create a a 48x10GbEthernet switch with stacking,
Please add support multiple ping tool window.
Implement natural sorting on dropdowns so 11 will not got first than 2.
Thanks
one question, what changed there that Winbox is now 52 megabytes. I understand that it's not much, but the 3rd weighs 2 megabytes and works faster, and sometimes pulling an extra megabyte through gprs is painful
Can't import address book frome 3.x
Copy the old files to the new location.
'/Users/YOUR_USER_NAME/Library/Application Support/MikroTik/WinBox
to
'~/Library/Application Support/MikroTik/WinBox
@@mikrotik That's an unacceptable "solution" to backing-up/restoring addresses.