super helpful, thank you! does look like the first locations you made resemble the mesa outputs on lake and the groups are the same here and on LAKE as well. thank you for making this video
I just updated the description with the missing link to How to Improve Measurement Quality at Low Frequencies www.l-acoustics.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Measurement_quality_in_LF.pdf Other public L-Acoustics white papers can be found here: www.l-acoustics.com/resource/white-papers/
Yes, it's in the description for the video above. It's a zebra pattern. My tests have also shown that you can continue these variations over height as well.
With that kind of a "Final Eq" If you would have done it with Smaart how far off would that trace be? and did you find it time saving/ a better result then 'ordinary' tuning a pa? Many thanks Pieter
Hey Pieter, I think you can get similar results in any audio analyzer. In the case of Smaart, imagine that you set up a TF pair to measure your EQ, invert it, and view it on top of your measurement. You should be able to hit the target exactly.
super helpful, thank you! does look like the first locations you made resemble the mesa outputs on lake and the groups are the same here and on LAKE as well. thank you for making this video
Glad it was helpful!
I just updated the description with the missing link to How to Improve Measurement Quality at Low Frequencies
www.l-acoustics.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Measurement_quality_in_LF.pdf
Other public L-Acoustics white papers can be found here: www.l-acoustics.com/resource/white-papers/
Do you have a link to that AES paper where L-Acoustics details those specific 8 mic positions?
Yes, it's in the description for the video above. It's a zebra pattern. My tests have also shown that you can continue these variations over height as well.
@@nathanlively Maybe I should get better at listening to directions : )
Ha! YT does not make the description text super obvious. :)
With that kind of a "Final Eq" If you would have done it with Smaart how far off would that trace be? and did you find it time saving/ a better result then 'ordinary' tuning a pa?
Many thanks Pieter
Hey Pieter, I think you can get similar results in any audio analyzer. In the case of Smaart, imagine that you set up a TF pair to measure your EQ, invert it, and view it on top of your measurement. You should be able to hit the target exactly.