L-Acoustics M1/P1: What can we learn from the workflow?

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 2 окт 2024

Комментарии • 9

  • @zoharpajela3988
    @zoharpajela3988 Год назад +1

    super helpful, thank you! does look like the first locations you made resemble the mesa outputs on lake and the groups are the same here and on LAKE as well. thank you for making this video

  • @MichaelCurtisAudio
    @MichaelCurtisAudio 3 года назад +1

    Do you have a link to that AES paper where L-Acoustics details those specific 8 mic positions?

    • @nathanlively
      @nathanlively  3 года назад

      Yes, it's in the description for the video above. It's a zebra pattern. My tests have also shown that you can continue these variations over height as well.

    • @MichaelCurtisAudio
      @MichaelCurtisAudio 3 года назад +1

      @@nathanlively Maybe I should get better at listening to directions : )

    • @nathanlively
      @nathanlively  3 года назад

      Ha! YT does not make the description text super obvious. :)

  • @pieterfun100
    @pieterfun100 Год назад +1

    With that kind of a "Final Eq" If you would have done it with Smaart how far off would that trace be? and did you find it time saving/ a better result then 'ordinary' tuning a pa?
    Many thanks Pieter

    • @nathanlively
      @nathanlively  Год назад +1

      Hey Pieter, I think you can get similar results in any audio analyzer. In the case of Smaart, imagine that you set up a TF pair to measure your EQ, invert it, and view it on top of your measurement. You should be able to hit the target exactly.

  • @nathanlively
    @nathanlively  3 года назад

    I just updated the description with the missing link to How to Improve Measurement Quality at Low Frequencies
    www.l-acoustics.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Measurement_quality_in_LF.pdf
    Other public L-Acoustics white papers can be found here: www.l-acoustics.com/resource/white-papers/