@@Zerioku true, but at the same time you’d thing with all these technological advancements, sim games would atleast look photorealistic. Sad reality is the issue of optimization which is getting worse each generation, causing mediocre graphics to tax a lot of gpu and cpu resources
Maybe because now they rather target high competitive 200+fps while having good looking enough graphics, instead having a photorealistic rt graphics but only60+-fps
GT7 literally has the most detailed car scans in the business. Only thing close is sport because that's when they started their new scanning tech. The reason it takes months for new cars to be rendered.
@@kedwyd6535Need for Speed Unbound looks hella realistic when you turn off the cartoon effects. Really astonishing. Gran Turismo looks also nuts in Ray Tracing mode, but you will only experience that in replay mode.
AC EVO still in early access, so they still have quite a room for improvement. But then, GT has large budget in their development, which makes sense for better fidelity and quality in visual department.
Thinking about it, GT7 looks great and all but on the flip side is so nice they are still developing games and supporting games for the xbox 360 platform 😂
Glad to read this comment I thought I was going crazy. Listen to the stock s2000 it seems way off, I know people will say it’ll improve but AC doesn’t have a history of great sounding games from what I’m aware
EVO is in it's first days of early access so I'm certain that almost every aspect of the game including graphics is gonna change for the better by the time it releases
Strasznie biednie wygląda ta Asseto Corsa Evo w porównaniu do Gran Turismo 7 🙈 Wycieraczki w AC, to chyba po jakimś dopalaczu są 🤣 Ruchy kierownicą tez jak z ADHD 🥴
last comparison Assetto actually looked pretty good, here it looks terrible, cars look like they are floating/glowing, they need to use RTGI or something
absolute oof for AC EVO. Early access should not be looking like a "pre-alpha test build 0.0001a" textures are fucking flat there are no fucking shading disgrace.
Mole poligonale complessiva molto maggiore su Evo, sistema di illuminazione molto più complesso e rifinito su GT7, gli abitacoli di Evo sembrano da PS3, senza co siderale le animazioni volante, inguardabile.
@andrewsqual They closed them down for severely dropping the ball. Apocalypse did bad and then they botched the release of DC when they based the entire premise of the game on the online component and then you couldn't successfully connect for 6 months.
This is stupid. A comparison between a fully completed game and one in an Alfa state. Very commendable! On top of that GT7 is not a PC title. There are far better choices mate.
To me it it sounds like ace has way too much gain and it has a kinda clipping sound to it, gt7 does seem a bit tame for a v8 though. Also watch some onboard footage from a rainy race, the rain is very loud and seems absent from ace
Toi ta jamais vue en réel une course sur une piste trempé, désolé pour toi GT7 et dans le vrai . La pluie sur Forza et complètement bidon c'est juste une pluie artificiel rien de plus .
@@JesappelleFREDO Aproveitei para assistir os comparativos, e de fato, os efeitos de chuva do novo Forza são MUITO MELHORES dos que o do GT7. É impossível brigar com as imagens. Podem não representar a realidade de forma perfeita, mas ambos os jogos não são simuladores para início de conversa.
@fernandoxsp3431 even in gameplay, forza just doesn't match the real tracks, so many liberties taken and like Assetto here can look terrible in certain conditions besides the typical dusk ones, yes gt7 looks better during replay than gameplay but they also compared it normally and when they compared replay moments the same is done for forza too so still even
@fernandoxsp3431 it has it's moments u can cherry pick, which can be done with gt7 as well or just as Assetto here the comparison video just before this one it looked better, that's normal, but overall gt7 still holds the crown for getting more right, from car materials interior to matching the real life track counterparts to most weather conditions looking nicer, etc and that's as a cross gen game picking up from sport and built with VR in mind (which btw is just amazing in VR) one can already imagine once polyphony does their next entry leaving last gen behind, it will be leaps than what forza attempted and assetto is here with EVO, Kaz Yamauchi is just goated when it comes to the passion for the racing genre
@@fernandoxsp3431 no one has compared Forza 8 graphics to real life. GT7 did it themselves with GTScapes and other's did it with track recordings and pictures even back when GTSport was released. Also GT7 has eSports meaning the game is stable and viable to be played competitively, and VR on console meaning the game is optimized to allow rendering the game twice for each eye at a high enough resolution.
FM has plastic toy cars with inaccurate details and inaccurate car sounds. FM also has inaccurate track details, as well as many tracks having oversized curbs. Some curbs being too smooth compared to the real track. FM has extremely exaggerated rain effects that don't not represent real life. Water doesn't form over time in FM but it does in GT7. The track doesn't gradually dry over time with the driving line being more dry as the outside line staying wet after the rain stops, but it does this in GT7. FM adds a bunch of light poles that don't exist in real life which ruins the night time driving. FM grass looks smooth like it is made from an N64 while GT7 has a high 3D grass density which also blows in the wind, and blows as each car passes bybat high speeds. Even the majority of the tracks in FM have smooth looking asphalt while GT7 has higher textures. With the grass looking smooth and asphalt looking smooth together, it gives an overall flat/smooth look to the game. I can go on about more things FM does wrong with its exaggerated unrealistic effects. It's just unreal effects to create a pretty game without being realistic.
![Seungmin "그렇게, 천천히, 우리(As we are)" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/kAzmhLHePqU/mqdefault.jpg)
racing / driving games used to be the pinnacle of graphic evolution, now it seems there hasn't been any improvement in at least 10 years.
Maybe because physics matter more on sim.
@@Zerioku true, but at the same time you’d thing with all these technological advancements, sim games would atleast look photorealistic. Sad reality is the issue of optimization which is getting worse each generation, causing mediocre graphics to tax a lot of gpu and cpu resources
Maybe because now they rather target high competitive 200+fps while having good looking enough graphics, instead having a photorealistic rt graphics but only60+-fps
GT7 literally has the most detailed car scans in the business. Only thing close is sport because that's when they started their new scanning tech. The reason it takes months for new cars to be rendered.
@@kedwyd6535Need for Speed Unbound looks hella realistic when you turn off the cartoon effects. Really astonishing. Gran Turismo looks also nuts in Ray Tracing mode, but you will only experience that in replay mode.
AC EVO still in early access, so they still have quite a room for improvement. But then, GT has large budget in their development, which makes sense for better fidelity and quality in visual department.
Irrelevant. Is it an early access game from 2011 lol?
@@andrewsqual I guess you're getting it confused with the original Assetto Corsa, this one just got in Early Access on the 16th
PS5 vs PS3 lol
Come on bro it's clearly PS5 vs PS2 in the wet weather. LoL 😂
Thinking about it, GT7 looks great and all but on the flip side is so nice they are still developing games and supporting games for the xbox 360 platform 😂
Y pensar que GT7 cuando salio segun muchos salio desfasado,le cayeron a palos etc y a dia de hoy nadie lo supera
gran turismo is better so far in my opinion
AC Evo looks straight out of PS3 lol
AC looks terrible ..
What’s with this cap about ACE sounding good?
On YT ACE sound like a vacuum cleaner with fart noises mixed into in😂
Glad to read this comment I thought I was going crazy. Listen to the stock s2000 it seems way off, I know people will say it’ll improve but AC doesn’t have a history of great sounding games from what I’m aware
EVO is in it's first days of early access so I'm certain that almost every aspect of the game including graphics is gonna change for the better by the time it releases
Gt7 👍 - Assetto Corsa 😂😂😂😂
Ain't rain conditions from the previous ACC supposed to looks better?Maybe because it is still an early access
yikes. i say just leave rain out of the game until you can get it right
Strasznie biednie wygląda ta Asseto Corsa Evo w porównaniu do Gran Turismo 7 🙈
Wycieraczki w AC, to chyba po jakimś dopalaczu są 🤣 Ruchy kierownicą tez jak z ADHD 🥴
AC EVO is currently 4% of 100% finished !!
Something is wrong with ACC here. I've seen videos where it looks much better, but here it looks like crap.
Que feo se ve ACE
last comparison Assetto actually looked pretty good, here it looks terrible, cars look like they are floating/glowing, they need to use RTGI or something
as evo better than gt7
Perfect games vs EARLY access games😅
absolute oof for AC EVO. Early access should not be looking like a "pre-alpha test build 0.0001a"
textures are fucking flat
there are no fucking shading
disgrace.
5090 will fix this
@@isandlaurius the 4090 handles the game fine.
@@isandlauriusno. Is the game. Is not about gpu. Game looks not so great.
Full game with lots of updates vs version 0.1
But GT7 launched with its Graphics...so wtf are you talking about. There's been no graphic updates to GT7.
Mole poligonale complessiva molto maggiore su Evo, sistema di illuminazione molto più complesso e rifinito su GT7, gli abitacoli di Evo sembrano da PS3, senza co siderale le animazioni volante, inguardabile.
Driveclub is still King
Yep. Still the dumbest thing Sony ever did closing Evolution. They were SO talented.
@@andrewsqual
GT7 simulates more variables for the weather. But DC did have a great visual effect.
@andrewsqual
They closed them down for severely dropping the ball. Apocalypse did bad and then they botched the release of DC when they based the entire premise of the game on the online component and then you couldn't successfully connect for 6 months.
Yep such a shame. But Motorstorm 1,2,3 like resistance needs to be remade for PS5.@@aaronsmith7143
This is stupid. A comparison between a fully completed game and one in an Alfa state. Very commendable!
On top of that GT7 is not a PC title. There are far better choices mate.
trash
Comparing the 0.1 version of the game with other games is so smart
they released it, so it will be compared. GTSport was compared during beta, so why not.
This is the peak on what it would look like, and would require bloated mods to make it look half as good as what Japanese artists do.
GT7 have muche higher budget. Evo will never beat gt7 in graphics.
yeah yeah 2025 game look worse than 2022 game
GT7 better graphics but Evo way better sound.
To me it it sounds like ace has way too much gain and it has a kinda clipping sound to it, gt7 does seem a bit tame for a v8 though. Also watch some onboard footage from a rainy race, the rain is very loud and seems absent from ace
both of games look like games from ps2
One with almost no rain effect and other with horrible rain effect. Probably Forza Motorsport is better than the two games of the comparison.
Toi ta jamais vue en réel une course sur une piste trempé, désolé pour toi GT7 et dans le vrai . La pluie sur Forza et complètement bidon c'est juste une pluie artificiel rien de plus .
@@JesappelleFREDO Aproveitei para assistir os comparativos, e de fato, os efeitos de chuva do novo Forza são MUITO MELHORES dos que o do GT7. É impossível brigar com as imagens. Podem não representar a realidade de forma perfeita, mas ambos os jogos não são simuladores para início de conversa.
it isn't forza already lost to GT digital foundry showed this already
@ That DF video is out of reality when you compare both gameplay footage instead of replay vs gameplay.
@fernandoxsp3431 even in gameplay, forza just doesn't match the real tracks, so many liberties taken and like Assetto here can look terrible in certain conditions besides the typical dusk ones, yes gt7 looks better during replay than gameplay but they also compared it normally and when they compared replay moments the same is done for forza too so still even
Forza is much better
it's not, digital foundry already showd it lose to GT7 in many ways
@ you can watch dozens of comparison videos here on yt showing the opposite.
@fernandoxsp3431 it has it's moments u can cherry pick, which can be done with gt7 as well or just as Assetto here the comparison video just before this one it looked better, that's normal, but overall gt7 still holds the crown for getting more right, from car materials interior to matching the real life track counterparts to most weather conditions looking nicer, etc and that's as a cross gen game picking up from sport and built with VR in mind (which btw is just amazing in VR)
one can already imagine once polyphony does their next entry leaving last gen behind, it will be leaps than what forza attempted and assetto is here with EVO, Kaz Yamauchi is just goated when it comes to the passion for the racing genre
@@fernandoxsp3431 no one has compared Forza 8 graphics to real life. GT7 did it themselves with GTScapes and other's did it with track recordings and pictures even back when GTSport was released. Also GT7 has eSports meaning the game is stable and viable to be played competitively, and VR on console meaning the game is optimized to allow rendering the game twice for each eye at a high enough resolution.
FM has plastic toy cars with inaccurate details and inaccurate car sounds. FM also has inaccurate track details, as well as many tracks having oversized curbs. Some curbs being too smooth compared to the real track.
FM has extremely exaggerated rain effects that don't not represent real life.
Water doesn't form over time in FM but it does in GT7.
The track doesn't gradually dry over time with the driving line being more dry as the outside line staying wet after the rain stops, but it does this in GT7.
FM adds a bunch of light poles that don't exist in real life which ruins the night time driving.
FM grass looks smooth like it is made from an N64 while GT7 has a high 3D grass density which also blows in the wind, and blows as each car passes bybat high speeds.
Even the majority of the tracks in FM have smooth looking asphalt while GT7 has higher textures. With the grass looking smooth and asphalt looking smooth together, it gives an overall flat/smooth look to the game.
I can go on about more things FM does wrong with its exaggerated unrealistic effects. It's just unreal effects to create a pretty game without being realistic.